Judgment of Princeton

Last updated

The Judgment of Princeton was a wine tasting (or blind tasting) event held on 8 June 2012 during a conference of the American Association of Wine Economists held at Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. The purpose of this event was to compare, by a blind tasting, of several French wines against wines produced in New Jersey in order to gauge the quality and development of the New Jersey wine industry. Because New Jersey's wine industry is relatively young and small, it has received little attention in the world wine market. The state's wine production has experienced growth in recent years largely as a result of state legislators offering new opportunities for winery licensing and repealing Prohibition-era laws that have constrained the industry's development in past years. This event was modeled after a 1976 blind tasting event dubbed the "Judgment of Paris" in which French wines were compared to several wines produced in California when that state's wine industry was similarly young and developing. The New Jersey wine industry heralded the results and asserted that the rating of New Jersey wines by the blind tasting's judges was a victory for the state's wine industry. [1]

Contents

Details

The Judgment of Princeton, held at Princeton University on Friday, June 8, 2012, was a structured blind tasting of top New Jersey wines against top French wines from Bordeaux and Burgundy. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] The event was based on the famous 1976 Judgment of Paris (wine), in which California wines famously beat French wines in a blind tasting. The Judgment of Princeton was spearheaded by George M. Taber, who had been in Paris for the original Judgment of Paris and later written a book on the subject. [8] Along with Taber, the tasting was organized and carried out by economists Orley Ashenfelter, Richard E. Quandt, Karl Storchmann, and Mark Censits, owner of CoolVines, a local wine and spirits shop, who acted in the role of merchant Steven Spurrier, gathering the competition wines from the NJ winemakers and selecting and sourcing the French wines against which they were to be pitted. The French wines were sourced from the same estates as the original wines of the Paris tasting. The event also included other members of the American Association of Wine Economists, who then posted the data set from the tastings online as an open invitation to further analysis. [9] [10]

The judges

Of the nine judges in Princeton, six were American, two French, and one Belgian. They are listed here in alphabetical order.

NameAffiliationNationality
Jean-Marie CardebatUniversité de BordeauxFlag of France.svg France
Tyler Colman DrVino.comFlag of the United States.svg USA
John Foy The Star-Ledger, thewineodyssey.comFlag of the United States.svg USA
Olivier Gergaud BEM Management School Flag of France.svg France
Robert HodgsonFieldbrook WineryFlag of the United States.svg USA
Danièle Meulders Université Libre de Bruxelles Flag of Belgium (civil).svg Belgium
Linda Murphy Decanter (magazine), American WineFlag of the United States.svg USA
Jamal RayyisGilbert & Gaillard Wine MagazineFlag of the United States.svg USA
Francis SchottStage Left Restaurant, RestaurantGuysRadio.comFlag of the United States.svg USA

Controversy

The judges were told, in advance, similar to the set up in the Judgment of Paris, that six wines in each flight of ten were from New Jersey. Subsequently, several of the judges complained about the revelation of their judgments, as also occurred in the Judgment of Paris.

Interpretation of results

In 1999, Quandt and Ashenfelter published a paper in the journal "Chance" that questioned the statistical interpretation of the results of the 1976 Judgment of Paris. The authors noted that a "side-by-side chart of best-to-worst rankings of 18 wines by a roster of experienced tasters showed about as much consistency as a table of random numbers," and reinterpreted the data, altering the results slightly, using a formula that they argued was more statistically valid (and less conclusive). [11] Quandt’s later paper "On Wine Bullshit" poked fun at the seemingly random strings of adjectives that often accompanied experts' published wine ratings. [12] More recent work by Robin Goldstein, Hilke Plassmann, Robert Hodgson, and other economists and behavioral scientists has shown high variability and inconsistency both within and between blind tasters; and little correlation has been found between price and preference, even among wine experts, in tasting settings in which labels and prices have been concealed. [13] [14]

Methodology

The blind tasting panel was made up of nine expert judges, with each wine graded out of 20 points. The tasting was performed behind closed doors at Princeton University, and results were kept secret from the judges until they were analyzed by Quandt and announced later that day. According to an algorithm devised by Quandt, each judge's set of ratings was converted to a set of personal rankings, which were in turn tabulated cumulatively by “votes against," with a lower score better (representing higher cumulative rankings) and a higher score worse (representing lower cumulative rankings). The data were then tested by Quandt for statistically significant differences between tasters and wines using the same software he had previously employed to re-analyze the Judgment of Paris results. [15]

The reveal

Shortly after the tasting was completed and the results tabulated, Taber, Quandt, and Ashenfelter announced the results to an audience of media, New Jersey winemakers, wine economists, and the judges themselves. The event took place in an auditorium at Princeton’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs as part of the American Association of Wine Economists’ annual meeting. Due to the technical limitations of Quandt's custom-built, floppy-disk-powered FORTRAN system, it was necessary for Goldstein to scrawl the results onto a giant chalkboard, eliciting murmurs of disapproval from the audience over his poor handwriting. [16]

Results

White wines

“Votes against” in the Ashenfelter-Quandt methodology are indicated here. (The maximum possible score in this tasting would have been 9, and the minimum 90.) Only one wine was significantly better, statistically, than the other wines: the Beaune 1er Cru Clos de Mouches 2010, the cheapest of the four white Burgundies in the lot. The rest of the wines were statistically indistinguishable from each other based on the data, meaning that no conclusions can be drawn from the rankings of wines #2 to #10. [16]

Significantly better than the other wines:

RankVotes AgainstWineryWineVintageOrigin
1.33.5 Joseph Drouhin Beaune Clos des Mouches 2009Flag of France.svg France

Not statistically distinguishable from each other:

RankVotes AgainstWineryWineVintageOrigin
2.38 Unionville Vineyards Pheasant Hill Chardonnay2010Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
3.45.5 Heritage Vineyards Chardonnay 2010Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
4.47.5 Silver Decoy Winery Black Feather Chardonnay2010Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
5.52 Domaine Leflaive Puligny-Montrachet 2009Flag of France.svg France
6. (tie)53 Bellview Winery Chardonnay2010Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
6. (tie)53 Marc-Antonin Blain Bâtard-Montrachet Grand Cru 2009Flag of France.svg France
8.54.5 Amalthea Cellars Chardonnay2008Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
9.57.5 Ventimiglia Vineyard Chardonnay2010Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
10.60.5 Jean Latour-Labille Meursault-Charmes Premier Cru 2008Flag of France.svg France

Red wines

“Votes against” in the Ashenfelter-Quandt methodology are indicated. (The maximum possible score in this tasting would have been 9, and the minimum 90.) The only wine that was significantly worse, statistically, than the other wines was #10, the Four JG’s Cabernet Franc 2008, from New Jersey. The rest of the wines were statistically indistinguishable from each other based on the data, meaning that no conclusions can be drawn from the rankings of wines #1 to #9. [16]

Not statistically distinguishable from each other:

RankVotes AgainstWineryWineVintageOrigin
1.35 Château Mouton-Rothschild Pauillac 2004Flag of France.svg France
2.40 Château Haut-Brion Pessac-Léognan 2004Flag of France.svg France
3.40.5Heritage VineyardsBDX (Bordeaux-style)2010Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
4.46 Château Montrose Saint-Estèphe 2004Flag of France.svg France
5.49 Tomasello Winery Cabernet Sauvignon Oak Reserve2007Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
6.50.5 Château Léoville-Las Cases Saint-Julien 2004Flag of France.svg France
7.52Bellview WineryLumière (Bordeaux-style)2010Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
8.54Silver Decoy Winery Cabernet Franc 2008Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey
9.55Amalthea CellarsEuropa VI (Bordeaux-style)2008Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey

Significantly worse than the other wines:

RankVotes AgainstWineryWineVintageOrigin
10.73 Four JG's Orchards & Vineyards Cabernet Franc2008Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Parker (wine critic)</span> American wine critic

Robert McDowell Parker Jr. is a retired U.S. wine critic. His wine ratings on a 100-point scale and his newsletter The Wine Advocate are influential in American wine buying and are therefore a major factor in setting the prices for newly released Bordeaux wines. This made him the most widely known and influential wine critic in the world.

<i>Wine Spectator</i> American wine magazine

Wine Spectator is an American lifestyle magazine that focuses on wine and wine culture, and gives out ratings to certain types of wine. It publishes 15 issues per year with content that includes news, articles, profiles, and general entertainment pieces. Each issue also includes from 400 to more than 1,000 wine reviews, which consist of wine ratings and tasting notes. The publication also awards its 100 chosen top wineries each year with the Winery of the Year Awards.

The Paris Wine Tasting of 1976, also known as the Judgment of Paris, was a wine competition organized in Paris on 24 May 1976 by Steven Spurrier, a British wine merchant and his colleague, Patricia Gallagher, in which French judges carried out two blind tasting comparisons: one of top-quality Chardonnays and another of red wines. A Napa wine rated best in each category, which caused surprise as France was generally regarded as being the foremost producer of the world's best wines. Spurrier sold only French wine and believed that the California wines would not win.

Blinded wine tasting is wine tasting undertaken in circumstances in which the tasters are kept unaware of the wines' identities. The blind approach is routine for wine professionals who wish to ensure impartiality in the judgment of the quality of wine during wine competitions or in the evaluation of a sommelier for professional certification. More recently wine scientists have used blinded tastings to explore the objective parameters of the human olfactory system as they apply to the ability of wine drinkers to identify and characterize the extraordinary variety of compounds that contribute to a wine’s aroma. Similarly, economists testing hypotheses relating to the wine market have used the technique in their research. Some blinded trials among wine consumers have indicated that people can find nothing in a wine's aroma or taste to distinguish between ordinary and pricey brands. Academic research on blinded wine tastings have also cast doubt on the ability of professional tasters to judge wines consistently.

Pierre Brejoux was Inspector General of the Appellation d'Origine Controlee Board, which controls the production of top French wines. he served as an expert wine taster in the Paris Wine Tasting of 1976. In the blind tasting, California wines won both the red and white wine categories. After the tasting, there were many calls for him to resign his position as Inspector General because so many people and groups were highly displeased with the results. He later revealed to George Taber that he traveled to California in 1974 and 'learned a lot - to my surprise...'. Brejoux also authored several books on French wine.

Christian Vannequé was a French sommelier and restaurateur.

A wine competition is an organized event in which trained judges or consumers competitively rate different vintages, categories, and/or brands of wine. Wine competitions generally use blind tasting of wine to prevent bias by the judges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Chardonnay Showdown</span>

The Great Chardonnay Showdown, held in the spring of 1980, was organized by Craig Goldwyn, the wine columnist for the Chicago Tribune and the founder of the Beverage Testing Institute, with help from three Chicago wine stores. A total of 221 Chardonnays from around the world were selected for the blind wine competition. France and California were heavily represented, but entries from many countries around the world were included.

George McCaffrey Taber is a journalist and entrepreneur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Jersey wine</span>

The production of wine in New Jersey has increased significantly in the last thirty years with the opening of new wineries. Beginning in 1981, the state legislature relaxed Prohibition-era restrictions and crafted new laws to facilitate the growth of the industry and provide new opportunities for winery licenses. Today, New Jersey wineries are crafting wines that have earned recognition for their quality from critics, industry leaders, and in national and international competitions. As of 2019, New Jersey currently has 51 licensed and operating wineries with several more prospective wineries in various stages of development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orley Ashenfelter</span> American economist

Orley Clark Ashenfelter is an American economist and the Joseph Douglas Green 1895 Professor of Economics at Princeton University. His areas of specialization include labor economics, econometrics, and law and economics. He was influential in contributing to the applied turn in economics.

Richard Emeric Quandt is a Guggenheim Fellowship-winning economist who analyzed the results of the Judgment of Paris wine tasting event with Orley Ashenfelter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wine tasting</span> Method of judging wine

Wine tasting is the sensory examination and evaluation of wine. While the practice of wine tasting is as ancient as its production, a more formalized methodology has slowly become established from the 14th century onward. Modern, professional wine tasters use a constantly evolving specialized terminology which is used to describe the range of perceived flavors, aromas and general characteristics of a wine. More informal, recreational tasting may use similar terminology, usually involving a much less analytical process for a more general, personal appreciation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amalthea Cellars</span> Winery in Camden County, New Jersey

Amalthea Cellars is a winery in the West Atco section of Winslow in Camden County, New Jersey. The vineyard was first planted in 1976, and opened to the public in 1981. Amalthea has 10 acres of grapes under cultivation, and produces 5,000 cases of wine per year. The winery is named after Amalthea, a moon of Jupiter, reflecting the owner's scientific background and love of mythology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bellview Winery</span>

Bellview Winery is a winery in the Landisville section of Buena in Atlantic County, New Jersey. A family produce farm since 1914, the vineyard was first planted in 2000, and opened to the public in 2001. Bellview has 40 acres of grapes under cultivation, and produces 8,000 cases of wine per year. The farm was named by the great-grandfather of the current owner, and is of Italian origin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old York Cellars</span>

Old York Cellars is a winery in the Ringoes section of East Amwell in Hunterdon County, New Jersey. Originally owned and established by the Fishers of Ringoes, the winery was purchased by David Wolin in 2008 and opened to the public in 2010. Old York Cellars has 12 acres of grapes under cultivation, and produces an estimated 3,600 cases of wine per year. The winery is named for the road where it is located.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ventimiglia Vineyard</span>

Ventimiglia Vineyard is a winery in Wantage Township in Sussex County, New Jersey. The vineyard was first planted in 2002, and opened to the public in 2008. Ventimiglia has 5 acres of grapes under cultivation, and produces 1,000 cases of wine per year. The winery is named after the family that owns it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unionville Vineyards</span>

Unionville Vineyard is a winery in the Unionville section of East Amwell in Hunterdon County, New Jersey. Originally part of the largest peach orchard in the United States, the vineyard was first planted in 1988, and opened to the public in 1993. Unionville has 41 acres of grapes under cultivation, and produces 4,500 cases of wine per year. The winery is named for a former village near where the farm is located.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tomasello Winery</span>

Tomasello Winery is a winery located in Hammonton in Atlantic County, New Jersey. Tomasello is the second-oldest active winery in the state, after Renault Winery. The vineyard was first planted in 1888, and opened to the public in 1933 after the end of Prohibition. Tomasello is one of the largest winegrowers in New Jersey, having 70 acres of grapes under cultivation, and producing 65,000 cases of wine per year. Although the winery is in Hammonton, most of the grapes are grown on three vineyards in the neighboring Winslow Township in Camden County. The winery is named after the family that owns it.

The American Association of Wine Economists (AAWE) is a non-profit, educational organization based in New York City.

References

  1. "GSWGA - News". Garden State Winegrower's Association. Archived from the original on 11 April 2013. Retrieved 18 February 2013.
  2. Brill, Emily. "Hey, France, Jerseyans can make wine, too" in The Times of Trenton (10 June 2012). Retrieved 5 September 2013
  3. "Blind test finds NJ wines hold their own with French competitors. New Jersey Today, June 12, 2012". Archived from the original on June 18, 2012. Retrieved June 13, 2012.
  4. In Princeton, it’s Judgment Day for NJ Wine Industry, NJTV.
  5. "Murphy, Linda. Judgment of Princeton Puts NJ on the map. JancisRobinson.com". Archived from the original on 2012-06-15. Retrieved 2012-06-13.
  6. "Judgment of Princeton could be turning point for NJ wine. PBS New Jersey". Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2012-06-13.
  7. Judgment of Princeton to pit Bordeaux and Burgundy against New Jersey. Bucks County Courier Times. Archived 2012-09-11 at the Wayback Machine
  8. Taber, George M Judgment of Paris: California vs France and the Historic Paris Tasting that Revolutionized Wine. NY: Simon & Schuster, 2005. ISBN   0-7432-9732-6
  9. AAWE: Tasting results Archived 2012-06-16 at the Wayback Machine
  10. Cowen, Tyler. Karl Storchmann reports from the front. Marginal Revolution, June 13, 2012.
  11. Ashenfelter, Orley; Richard Quandt (1999). "Analyzing a Wine Tasting Statistically". Chance. 12 (3): 16–20. doi:10.1080/09332480.1999.10542152.
  12. Quandt, Richard E (2007). "On Wine Bullshit" (PDF). Journal of Wine Economics. 2 (2). doi:10.1017/S1931436100000389. S2CID   170562491. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2013-04-09.
  13. Goldstein, Robin (2008). "Do More Expensive Wines Taste Better? Evidence from a large sample of blind tastings". Journal of Wine Economics. 3 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1017/S1931436100000523. S2CID   2491510.
  14. Goldstein, Robin (2011) [2008]. The Wine Trials: 175 wines under $15 that beat $50-150 bottles in blind taste tests . New York: Workman. ISBN   978-1-6081-6007-5.
  15. Quandt, Richard. "Liquid Assets": algorithm
  16. 1 2 3 "AAWE: The Judgment of Princeton". Archived from the original on 2012-06-18. Retrieved 2012-06-13.