M-learning

Last updated

M-learning, or mobile learning, is a form of distance education where learners use portable devices such as mobile phones to learn anywhere and anytime. The portability that mobile devices provide allows for learning anywhere, hence the term "mobile" in "mobile learning." [1] M-learning devices include computers, MP3 players, mobile phones, and tablets. M-learning can be an important part of informal learning. [2]

Contents

M-learning is convenient in that it is accessible virtually anywhere. It allows for the instant sharing of feedback and tips since mobile devices are often connected to the internet. M-learning also offers strong portability by replacing books and notes with small devices filled with tailored learning content. Moreover, it has the added benefit of being cost-effective, as the price of digital content on tablets is falling sharply compared to traditional media such as books, CDs, DVDs, etc. For example, a digital textbook costs one-third to half the price of a paper textbook, with zero marginal cost. [3]

According to Fombona, Pascual-Sevillana, and González-Videgaray, this methodology offers various possibilities, including greater and different access to information. It also introduces significant innovations, such as the increase in informal and playful activities, iconic virtual membership, and networks of friendly interaction within new scales of values. [4]

Background

Mobile learning is the delivery of learning, education, or learning support on mobile phones, PDAs, or tablets. New mobile technology, such as hand-held-based devices, is playing a large role in redefining how people receive information. [5]

History of M-learning

Concepts of m-learning were introduced by Alan Kay in the 1970s when he joined Xerox Corporation's Palo Alto Research Center and formed a group to develop the "Dynabook," a portable and hands-on personal computer. The aim was to provide children with access to the digital world. [6] However, this project eventually failed due to a lack of technological support at that time. In 1994, Mitsubishi Electric Corp. created the first smartphone called IBM Simon, which was defined as a handheld personal communicator. [7] Following this, various technological companies began designing what we now know as "smartphones." The creation of smartphones laid the foundation for mobile learning, and subsequent innovations in mobile devices propelled mobile learning into the realm of projects and research.

Chronologically, m-learning research has been characterized into three phases: the first phase is the focus on devices; the second is the focus on learning outside the classroom; the third phase is the focus on the mobility of the learner. [8] In its second phase, around 2005, a tremendous number of projects have been completed, four major projects are "The Leonardo da Vinci project From e-learning to m-learning led by Ericsson Education Dublin", "The Leonardo da Vinci project Mobile learning: the next generation of learning led by Ericsson Education Dublin", "The IST project M-Learning led by the United Kingdom government Learning and Skills Development Agency (LSDA)" and "The IST project MOBILearn led by Giunti Ricerca of Genoa, Italy". These projects are mainly targeted on the effects of m-learning, like motivation to learn, engagement in learning activities, and focus on special needs people; [9] they set the tone for mobile learning, and m-learning is prepared to transfer from project status to mainstream education and training. [10]

Chronologically, m-learning research can be divided into three phases: the first phase focused on devices, the second phase emphasised learning outside the classroom, and the third phase emphasised the mobility of learners. [8] During the second phase, around 2005, a significant number of projects were completed. Four notable projects were "The Leonardo da Vinci project: From e-learning to m-learning," led by Ericsson Education Dublin; "The Leonardo da Vinci project: Mobile learning - the next generation of learning," also led by Ericsson Education Dublin; "The IST project: M-Learning," led by the United Kingdom government Learning and Skills Development Agency (LSDA); and "The IST project: MOBILearn," led by Giunti Ricerca of Genoa, Italy. These projects primarily focused on the effects of m-learning, such as motivation to learn, engagement in learning activities, and catering to the needs of special needs individuals. [11] They set the stage for mobile learning, preparing it to transition from project status to mainstream education and training. [12]

Currently, m-learning research has become globalised, with Africa, Asia, North America, Europe, Scandinavia, Australia, and New Zealand all making remarkable achievements in this field. [8]

Approaches

The use of mobile learning in the military is becoming increasingly common due to low cost and high portability. Military Mobile Learning.jpg
The use of mobile learning in the military is becoming increasingly common due to low cost and high portability.

Classroom

Parts of Group Collaboration Group Collaboration.png
Parts of Group Collaboration

Applications in classrooms and other learning spaces combine the use of handheld computers, PDAs, smartphones, or handheld voting systems (such as clickers) with traditional resources. [13]

Class management

Mobile devices in brick-and-mortar classrooms can be used to enhance student-centered learning and group collaboration among students through communication applications, interactive displays, quick response codes, [14] and video features. [15]

In a literature review conducted by FutureLab, researchers found that increased communication, collaboration, and understanding of concepts were a result of mobile technology applications. [17]

Distance Learning

Mobile devices can be used in online settings to enhance learning experiences. [18]

Podcasting

Podcasting consists of listening to audio recordings of lectures. It can be used to review live lectures [20] and to provide opportunities for students to rehearse oral presentations. Podcasts may also provide supplemental information to enhance traditional lectures. [21]

Psychological research suggests that university students who download podcast lectures achieve substantially higher exam results than those who attend the lecture in person (only in cases in which students take notes). [22]

Podcasts may be delivered using syndication, although this method of delivery is not always easily adopted. [23]

Work

M-learning in the context of work can encompass various forms of learning. It has been defined as the "processes of coming to know, and of being able to operate successfully in, and across, new and ever-changing contexts, including learning for, at and through work, by utilising mobile devices". [24]

Learning for work, also known as 'just-in-case' learning, involves traditional and formal educational activities, such as training courses, that prepare learners for future work-related tasks. A typical corporate application is the delivery of mobile compliance training, which can effectively reach geographically mobile employees like consultants [25] or staff in logistics and transport systems. [26] Another application is mobile simulations that prepare learners for future situations, such as real-time SMS-based simulations for disaster response training. [27]

Learning at and through work, labeled as "just-in-time" mobile learning, [28] occurs in informal educational settings within the workplace. Employees can use mobile phones and handheld devices to solve problems on the spot, for example, by accessing informational resources like checklists and reference guides before customer visits [29] or mobile decision support systems. The latter is particularly popular in clinical settings, where they assist highly mobile medical staff in making decisions regarding complex patient cases using rule-based algorithms. Their application has been associated with learning and, specifically, with improving the practice of medical staff. [30] Learning through work also occurs through interaction with distant peers via phone. "People tagging" is an approach where individuals assign topics to their co-workers. The aggregation of interests and experiences serves as a means to raise awareness and locate competent experts when needed, particularly with context-sensitive expert location systems. [31]

Cross-contextual learning, which bridges the gap between work settings and formal education formats, holds significant potential for work-based mobile learning, [24] especially within tertiary education systems. This involves approaches where learning in the workplace is facilitated and supported (e.g., through formative assessments, [32] reflective questions, [33] or the documentation of personal achievements in multimedia learning diaries or portfolios [34] ) The materials created in this process are later utilised in more formal educational formats, such as classrooms or discussions with tutors. The value of these mobile phone-mediated learning practices lies in the integration and harmonisation of work-based learning and formal education experiences, which otherwise tend to remain separate.

Lifelong learning and self-learning

Mobile technologies and approaches, i.e. mobile-assisted language learning (MALL), are also used to assist in language learning. For instance handheld computers, cell phones, and podcasting [35] have been used to help people acquire and develop language skills.

Other

Mobile learning for refugees

Refugees are confronted several individual challenges that can negatively impact their learning and teaching opportunities, as well as their lives beyond the learning environment. Mobile solutions play a key role in enhancing refugees' informal learning. Technology provides support for refugees' informal learning in the following challenges: [37]

Around the world

Spain

The mSchools programme is a comprehensive mobile education initiative led by a public–private partnership between the Generalitat de Catalunya (Government of Catalonia), Barcelona City Hall and the GSMA. The objective of mSchools is to empower students and teachers to integrate mobile technologies into the classroom, opening up new ways of teaching and learning that improve learner engagement, achievement and employability. mSchools develops curricular materials, tools and methodologies designed to help teachers to change their pedagogy and methodology, and students to become lifelong learners. It has a special focus on digital competencies, advocacy for career paths in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM), and fostering gender equality (UNESCO, 2013). The mSchools programme brings together private and public institutions to help students build paramount new skills and prepare them for today's digital world. The mSchools programme comprises many initiatives, including online platforms, curricular materials, events, challenges and methodologies. [38]

Finland

The Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education was renewed in 2014. Considering the increasing significance of technology as both an objective and a means of learning, ICT and mobile learning were integrated into the new National Core Curriculum as a transversal competence that is present in all learning and teaching.

PaikkaOppi (which roughly means ’learning of places’) is a Finnish educational innovation supporting open science and the information society. It is an open web-based learning environment for Geographic Information System (GIS) usage in schools. Moreover, it is a potential spearhead in national policy for the development of skills and education by integrating disciplines and promoting the use of mobile learning. Students are able to view, analyze and share their data collaboratively or individually with browser-based map applications. Mobile applications for Android and iOS devices are for saving personal data in the field trips or at home. Being accessible to all users free of charge, PaikkaOppi is very widely used at schools, home and on free time as well. The service supports teaching the core curricula: competences for spatial citizenship, multi-literacy skills, logical thinking, and problem solving skills. The service is being used all over the country as a project platform for several school subjects and multidisciplinary learning modules from primary schools to upper secondary. [39]

Pakistan

In Pakistan, the Rehan School was one of the first initiatives to offer remote courses that could be accessed from a basic mobile phone. The application offers short educational sequences, showing how to write common names and words and conveying mathematical and scientific concepts. Sometimes featuring television personalities, the teaching sketches are intended for viewing on small telephone screens. The films are sold for a few cents in the telecoms boutiques and can then be exchanged by Bluetooth. The Rehan School estimates that over 40,000 individuals follow its lessons, but the real number is certainly higher. [3]

Papua New Guinea

In Papua New Guinea, the SMS Story project has improved teachers' classroom practices in teaching children to read by using short messages and sent by SMS. [3]

Sub-Saharan Africa

Since the 1960s, various information and communication technologies have aroused strong interest in Sub-Saharan Africa as a way of increasing access to education, and enhancing its quality and fairness. In Sub-Saharan Africa, teachers and students are faced with an extreme shortage of teaching materials. The number of textbooks available are limited, so few students have individual access to textbooks in class or at home. Given the shortage of textbooks in many African schools, tablets and mobile phones are being viewed by governments and international organizations as a solution to provide access to learning materials. In one example, the Tangerine mobile assessment and coaching system, deployed in Kenya, aims to help teachers in their assessment activities. With Tangerine, a student's reading level can be evaluated by recording the student's answers on a mobile phone or a tablet. The data gathered by the application also allows comparisons of the learning levels of students according to their age, geographical area and gender. [3]

Analysis

Effectiveness

A recent study on health professions education combined evidence from 29 studies, which included 3175 learners, and concluded that mLearning is as effective as traditional learning in terms of improving learners' knowledge and skill. The study highlights that mLearning is a novel educational strategy that is rapidly developing in the field of health professions education, "21 of the 29 included studies (72%) published between 2014 and 2017, it’s clear that mLearning is an emerging educational strategy. The remaining 8 studies were published between 2006 and 2013, with no studies published before 2006, further highlighting the modern nature of this approach to health professions education and its relevance" [40]

Value

The value of mobile learning [41]

Tutors who have used m-learning programs and techniques have made the following value statements in favor of m-learning.

Benefits [1] [43] [44]

Characterization

Characterization of M-learning

Aspects

Aspects of M-learning

Along with the development of m-learning, many theories about mobile educations are raised by researchers, major aspects are listed.

Challenges

Technical challenges
Social and educational challenges [50]

Growth

Mobile learning is widely used in schools, workplaces, museums, cities and rural areas around the world. [57] In comparison to traditional classroom pedagogical approaches, mobile learning allows widened opportunities for timing, location, accessibility and context of learning. [5] [58]

Current areas of growth include:

See also

Sources

Definition of Free Cultural Works logo notext.svg  This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0( license statement/permission ). Text taken from Digital Services for Education in Africa , UNESCO, UNESCO. UNESCO.

Definition of Free Cultural Works logo notext.svg  This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO. Text taken from A Lifeline to learning: leveraging mobile technology to support education for refugees , UNESCO, UNESCO. UNESCO.

Related Research Articles

Distance education, also known as distance learning, is the education of students who may not always be physically present at school, or where the learner and the teacher are separated in both time and distance. Traditionally, this usually involved correspondence courses wherein the student corresponded with the school via mail. Distance education is a technology-mediated modality and has evolved with the evolution of technologies such as video conferencing, TV, and the Internet. Today, it usually involves online education and the learning is usually mediated by some form of technology. A distance learning program can either be completely a remote learning, or a combination of both online learning and traditional offline classroom instruction. Other modalities include distance learning with complementary virtual environment or teaching in virtual environment (e-learning).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adult education</span> Any form of learning adults engage in beyond traditional schooling

Adult education, distinct from child education, is a practice in which adults engage in systematic and sustained self-educating activities in order to gain new forms of knowledge, skills, attitudes, or values. It can mean any form of learning adults engage in beyond traditional schooling, encompassing basic literacy to personal fulfillment as a lifelong learner, and to ensure the fulfillment of an individual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Problem-based learning</span> Learner centric pedagogy

Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered pedagogy in which students learn about a subject through the experience of solving an open-ended problem found in trigger material. The PBL process does not focus on problem solving with a defined solution, but it allows for the development of other desirable skills and attributes. This includes knowledge acquisition, enhanced group collaboration and communication.

Information and communications technology (ICT) is an extensional term for information technology (IT) that stresses the role of unified communications and the integration of telecommunications and computers, as well as necessary enterprise software, middleware, storage and audiovisual, that enable users to access, store, transmit, understand and manipulate information.

Educational technology is the combined use of computer hardware, software, and educational theory and practice to facilitate learning. When referred to with its abbreviation, "EdTech," it often refers to the industry of companies that create educational technology. In EdTech Inc.: Selling, Automating and Globalizing Higher Education in the Digital Age, Tanner Mirrlees and Shahid Alvi (2019) argue "EdTech is no exception to industry ownership and market rules" and "define the EdTech industries as all the privately owned companies currently involved in the financing, production and distribution of commercial hardware, software, cultural goods, services and platforms for the educational market with the goal of turning a profit. Many of these companies are US-based and rapidly expanding into educational markets across North America, and increasingly growing all over the world."

Technology integration is defined as the use of technology to enhance and support the educational environment. Technology integration in the classroom can also support classroom instruction by creating opportunities for students to complete assignments on the computer rather than with normal pencil and paper. In a larger sense, technology integration can also refer to the use of an integration platform and application programming interface (API) in the management of a school, to integrate disparate SaaS applications, databases, and programs used by an educational institution so that their data can be shared in real-time across all systems on campus, thus supporting students' education by improving data quality and access for faculty and staff.

"Curriculum integration with the use of technology involves the infusion of technology as a tool to enhance the learning in a content area or multidisciplinary setting... Effective technology integration is achieved when students can select technology tools to help them obtain information on time, analyze and synthesize it, and present it professionally to an authentic audience. Technology should become an integral part of how the classroom functions—as accessible as all other classroom tools. The focus in each lesson or unit is the curriculum outcome, not the technology."

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is an educational framework based on research in the learning sciences, including cognitive neuroscience, that guides the development of flexible learning environments and learning spaces that can accommodate individual learning differences.

Audience Response is a type of interaction associated with the use of Audience Response systems to create interactivity between a presenter and their audience.

Podcasting refers to the creation and regular distribution of podcasts through the Internet. Podcasts, which can include audio, video, PDF, and ePub files, are subscribed to and downloaded through web syndication or streamed online to a computer or mobile device. Subscribers are then able to view, listen to, and transfer the episodes to a variety of media players, or podcatchers. Though similar to radio, there is no larger regulatory group or oversight with podcasts. Instead, podcasts simply consist of the creators and their listeners. As the technology gained popularity in the early 2000s, the uses of podcasting grew from simply the delivery of content to also creative and responsive purposes.

In the context of education, one-to-one computing refers to academic institutions, such as schools or colleges, that allow each enrolled student to use an electronic device in order to access the Internet, digital course materials, and digital textbooks. The concept has been actively explored and sporadically implemented since the late 1990s. One-to-one computing used to be contrasted with a policy of "bring your own device" (BYOD), which encourages or requires students to use their own laptops, smartphones or other electronic devices in class. The distinction between BYOD and school-issued devices became blurred when many schools started recommending devices for parents to buy. The term 1:1 computing in education is now redefined to a situation where students have access to a device per individual that is used in the teaching as a tool for learning. Historically, the programs have centered around the following devices:

An edublog is a blog created for educational purposes. Edublogs archive and support student and teacher learning by facilitating reflection, questioning by self and others, collaboration and by providing contexts for engaging in higher-order thinking. Edublogs proliferated when blogging architecture became more simplified and teachers perceived the instructional potential of blogs as an online resource. The use of blogs has become popular in education institutions including public schools and colleges. Blogs can be useful tools for sharing information and tips among co-workers, providing information for students, or keeping in contact with parents. Common examples include blogs written by or for teachers, blogs maintained for the purpose of classroom instruction, or blogs written about educational policy. Educators who blog are sometimes called edubloggers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital native</span> Person who has grown up in the digital age

The term digital native describes a person who has grown up in the information age. The term "digital native" was coined by Marc Prensky, an American writer, speaker and technologist who wrote several articles referencing this subject. This term specifically applied to the generation that grew up in the "digital age," predominantly regarding individuals born after the year 1980, namely Millennials, Generation Z, and Generation Alpha. Individuals from these demographic cohorts can consume digital information quickly and comfortably through electronic devices and platforms such as computers, mobile phones, and social media.

Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) is language learning that is assisted or enhanced through the use of a handheld mobile device.

Mobile translation is any electronic device or software application that provides audio translation. The concept includes any handheld electronic device that is specifically designed for audio translation. It also includes any machine translation service or software application for hand-held devices, including mobile telephones, Pocket PCs, and PDAs. Mobile translation provides hand-held device users with the advantage of instantaneous and non-mediated translation from one human language to another, usually against a service fee that is, nevertheless, significantly smaller than a human translator charges.

Augmented learning is an on-demand learning technique where the environment adapts to the learner. By providing remediation on-demand, learners can gain greater understanding of a topic while stimulating discovery and learning. Technologies incorporating rich media and interaction have demonstrated the educational potential that scholars, teachers and students are embracing. Instead of focusing on memorization, the learner experiences an adaptive learning experience based upon the current context. The augmented content can be dynamically tailored to the learner's natural environment by displaying text, images, video or even playing audio. This additional information is commonly shown in a pop-up window for computer-based environments.

Social learning tools are tools used for pedagogical and andragogical purposes that utilize social software and/or social media in order to facilitate learning through interactions between individuals and systems. The idea of setting up "social learning tools" is to make education more convenient and widespread. It also allows an interaction between users and/or the software which can bring a different aspect to learning. People can acquire knowledge by distance learning tools, for instance, Facebook, Twitter, Khan Academy and so on. Social learning tools may mediate in formal or informal learning environments to help create connections between learners, instructors and information. These connections form dynamic knowledge networks. Social learning tools are used in schools for teaching/learning and in businesses for training. Within a school environment, the use of social learning tools can affect not only the user (student) but his/her caretaker as well as his/her instructor. It brings a different approach to the traditional way of learning which affects the student and his/her support circle. Companies also use social learning tools. They used them to improve knowledge transfer within departments and across teams. Businesses use a variety of these tools to create a social learning environment. They are also used in company settings to help improve team work, problem solving, and performance in stressful situations.

Mobile computer-supported collaborative learning may have different meanings depending on the context in which it is applied. Mobile CSCL includes any in-class and out-of-class use of handheld mobile devices such as cell phones, smart phones, and personal digital assistants (PDAs) to enable collaborative learning.

Social media in education is the use of social media to enhance education. Social media is "a group of Internet-based applications...that allow the creation and exchange of user-generated content". It is also known as the read/write web. As time went on and technology evolved, social media has been an integral part of people's lives, including students, scholars, and teachers in the form of social media. However, social media is controversial because in addition to providing new means of connection, critics claim that it damages self-esteem, shortens attention spans, and increases mental health issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning environment</span> Term in education

The term learning environment can refer to an educational approach, cultural context, or physical setting in which teaching and learning occur. The term is commonly used as a more definitive alternative to "classroom", but it typically refers to the context of educational philosophy or knowledge experienced by the student and may also encompass a variety of learning cultures—its presiding ethos and characteristics, how individuals interact, governing structures, and philosophy. In a societal sense, learning environment may refer to the culture of the population it serves and of their location. Learning environments are highly diverse in use, learning styles, organization, and educational institution. The culture and context of a place or organization includes such factors as a way of thinking, behaving, or working, also known as organizational culture. For a learning environment such as an educational institution, it also includes such factors as operational characteristics of the instructors, instructional group, or institution; the philosophy or knowledge experienced by the student and may also encompass a variety of learning cultures—its presiding ethos and characteristics, how individuals interact, governing structures, and philosophy in learning styles and pedagogies used; and the societal culture of where the learning is occurring. Although physical environments do not determine educational activities, there is evidence of a relationship between school settings and the activities that take place there.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital media in education</span>

Digital Media in education is measured by a person's ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and produce media content and communication in a variety of forms. These media may involve incorporating multiple digital softwares, devices, and platforms as a tool for learning. The use of digital media in education is growing rapidly in today's age, competing with books for the leading form of communication. This form of education is slowly combating the traditional forms of education that have been around for a long time. With the introduction of virtual education, there has been a need for more incorporation of new digital platforms in online classrooms.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Crescente, Mary Louise; Lee, Doris (March 2011). "Critical issues of m-learning: design models, adoption processes, and future trends". Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers. 28 (2): 111–123. doi:10.1080/10170669.2010.548856. S2CID   62712900.
  2. Trentin G. & Repetto M. (Eds) (2013). Using Network and Mobile Technology to Bridge Formal and Informal Learning, Woodhead/Chandos Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, ISBN   978-1-84334-699-9.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Agence Française de Développement, Agence universitaire de la Francophonie, Orange, & UNESCO. (2015). Digital Services for Education in Africa. Savoirs communs, 17.
  4. Fombona, Javier; Pascual-Sevillano, María-de-los-Ángeles; González-Videgaray, MariCarmen (1 July 2017). "M-learning and augmented reality: A review of the scientific literature on the WoS repository". Comunicar. 25 (52): 63–72. doi: 10.3916/c52-2017-06 . hdl: 10272/14088 .
  5. 1 2 Oller, Rick. The Future of Mobile Learning (research bulletin). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, May 1, 2012.
  6. Maxwell, John (2006). Tracing the Dynabook: A Study of Technocultural Transformations.
  7. Koblentz, Evan. Abacus to Smartphone: The evolution of mobile and portable computing.
  8. 1 2 3 Cochrane, Thomas (2013). A Summary and Critique of M-Learning Research and Practice. ISBN   9780415503693.
  9. Swan, Karen (2005). "Teaching and Learning with Mobile Computing Devices: Closing the Gap". pp. 25–28. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.508.5837 .
  10. Keegan, Desmond (2005). THE INCORPORATION OF MOBILE LEARNING INTO MAINSTREAM EDUCATION AND TRAINING.
  11. Swan, Karen (2005). "Teaching and Learning with Mobile Computing Devices: Closing the Gap". pp. 25–28. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.508.5837 .
  12. Keegan, Desmond (2005). THE INCORPORATION OF MOBILE LEARNING INTO MAINSTREAM EDUCATION AND TRAINING.
  13. Tremblay, Remi (2010). "Mobile Learning Panel" (PDF). Mobile Learning Panel. Advanced Decision Learning (ADL). Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  14. Yfantis, Vasileios (2012). Quick response codes in E-learning. International Conference on Education and e-Learning Innovations (ICEELI). IEEE.
  15. Murray, Orrin; Nicole Olcese (November–December 2011). "Teaching and Learning with iPads, Ready or Not?". TechTrends. 55 (6): 42–48. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.471.6382 . doi:10.1007/s11528-011-0540-6. S2CID   17347164.
  16. 1 2 "7 THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT MOBILE APPS FOR LEARNING". EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. 4 May 2010.
  17. 1 2 Naismith, Laura; Lonsdale, Peter; Vavoula, Giasemi; Sharples, Mike (2004). "Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning". FutureLab Series (11).
  18. Robinson, R. & Reinhart, J. (2014). Digital Thinking and Mobile Teaching: Communicating, Collaborating, and Constructing in an Access Age. Denmark: Bookboon.
  19. French Development Agency; UNESCO (2015). Digital services for education in Africa. Paris: French Development Agency & UNESCO. p. 113. Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  20. Clark, Steve; Taylor, Lucy; Westcott, Mark (2007). "Using short podcasts to reinforce lectures". UniServe Science Teaching and Learning Research Proceedings (Proceedings of the Science Teaching and Learning Research Including Threshold Concepts Symposium). Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  21. McGarr, Oliver (2009). "A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture". Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 25 (3). doi: 10.14742/ajet.1136 . Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  22. McGarr, Oliver (2009). "A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture". Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 25 (3). doi: 10.14742/ajet.1136 . Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  23. Lee, Mark J.W.; Miller, Charlynn; Newnham, Leon (2009). "Podcasting syndication services and university students: Why don't they subscribe?". The Internet and Higher Education. 12 (1): 53-59. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.001. hdl:1959.17/59910. S2CID   61098062 . Retrieved 8 June 2023.
  24. 1 2 Pachler, N., Pimmer, C., & Seipold, J. (Eds.). (2011). Work-Based Mobile Learning. Concepts and Cases. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter-Lang, drawing on Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile Learning: Structures, Agency, Practices (Vol. 1). New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer.
  25. Swanson, K. (2008). "Merrill Lynch: Bullish on Mobile Learning (case study)". Chief Learning Officer. Retrieved from
  26. Stead, G., & Good, M. (2011). "Mobile learning in vocational settings: lessons from the E-Ten BLOOM project". In N. Pachler, C. Pimmer, & J. Seipold (Eds.), Work-based mobile learning: concepts and cases. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter-Lang
  27. Cornelius, S., & Marston, P. (2011). "Work-based simulations: using text messaging and the role of the virtual context". In N. Pachler, C. Pimmer, & J. Seipold (Eds.), Work-based mobile learning: concepts and cases. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter-Lang
  28. Pimmer, C., & Gröhbiel, U. (2008). Mobile Learning in corporate settings. Results from an Expert Survey. Paper presented at the mLearn2008. The Bridge From Text To Context, Telford.
  29. "Smartphones Make IBM Smarter, But Not As Expected". TD.
  30. Grad, Roland M.; Pluye, Pierre; Meng, Yuejing; Segal, Bernard; Tamblyn, Robyn (December 2005). "Assessing the impact of clinical information-retrieval technology in a family practice residency". Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 11 (6): 576–586. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00594.x. PMID   16364111.
  31. Cook, John; Pachler, Norbert (September 2012). "Online people tagging: Social (mobile) network(ing) services and work-based learning: For special issue social networking and mobile learning". British Journal of Educational Technology. 43 (5): 711–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01346.x .
  32. Coulby, Ceridwen; Hennessey, Scott; Davies, Nancy; Fuller, Richard (March 2011). "The use of mobile technology for work-based assessment: the student experience: Mobile technology for students". British Journal of Educational Technology. 42 (2): 251–265. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01022.x.
  33. Pirttiaho, P., Holm, J.-M., Paalanen, H., & Thorström, T. (2007). Etaitava - Mobile Tool for On-the-Job Learning Paper presented at the Iadis, International Conference Mobile Learning, Lisbon, Portugal
  34. Chan, S. (2011). "Becoming a baker: using mobile phones to compile e-portfolios". In N. Pachler, C. Pimmer & J. Seipold (Eds.), Work-based mobile learning:Concepts and cases (pp. 91-117). Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter-Lang.
  35. Kenning, Marie-Madeleine, ed. (2007). Language Learning by iPod: An Emerging Model (1st ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   978-1349354900.
  36. Raftree, Linda; Martin, Nick (26 February 2013). "Youth unemployment: can mobile technology improve employability?". The Guardian.
  37. 1 2 UNESCO (2018). A Lifeline to learning: leveraging mobile technology to support education for refugees. UNESCO. ISBN   978-92-3-100262-5.
  38. "mSchools: Transforming the education landscape in Catalonia (Spain) through a systemic and inclusive mobile learning programme". unesdoc.unesco.org. Retrieved 15 June 2022.
  39. "Transforming Finnish schools to mobile learning environments with a competence-based core curriculum". unesdoc.unesco.org. Retrieved 15 June 2022.
  40. Dunleavy, Gerard; Nikolaou, Charoula Konstantia; Nifakos, Sokratis; Atun, Rifat; Law, Gloria Chun Yi; Tudor Car, Lorainne (12 February 2019). "Mobile Digital Education for Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21 (2): e12937. doi: 10.2196/12937 . PMC   6390189 . PMID   30747711.
  41. Mobile learning in Practice: Piloting a Mobile Learning Teachers’ Toolkit in Further Education Colleges. C. Savil-Smith et al. (2006), p. 8
  42. Gebbe, Marcel; Teine, Matthias; Beutner, Marc (2016). "A Holistic Approach to Scoring in Complex Mobile Learning Scenarios". In Miguel Baptista Nunes; Maggie McPherson (eds.). MCCSIS 2016. Madeira: IADIS Press. pp. 19–27. ISBN   9789898533517. OCLC   958149790.
  43. 1 2 Elias, Tanya (February 2011). "Universal Instructional Design Principles for Mobile Learning". The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 12 (2): 143–156. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.965 .
  44. Using Mobile Devices to Integrate Economics Simulations in Teaching Approaches Based on Direct Instruction Archived 2014-07-28 at the Wayback Machine on: International Teacher Education Conference 2014 01.10.2014.
  45. Rudestam, K., & Schoenholtz-Read (2009). Handbook of online learning, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
  46. Ozdamli, Fezile; Cavus, Nadire (December 2011). "Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 28: 937–942. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.173 .
  47. Maniar, N.; Bennett, E.; Hand, S.; Allan, G (2008). "The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning". Journal of Software. 3 (4): 51–61. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.460.9863 . doi:10.4304/jsw.3.4.51-61.
  48. Elias, Tanya (February 2011). "Universal Instructional Design Principles for Mobile Learning". The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 12 (2): 143. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.965 .
  49. Cordock, Richard Parkes (November 2010). "The future of mobile learning". Training Journal: 63–67. ProQuest   763160208.
  50. Masters, Ken; Ellaway, Rachel H.; Topps, David; Archibald, Douglas; Hogue, Rebecca J. (2016). "Mobile technologies in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 105". Medical Teacher. 38 (6): 537–549. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2016.1141190. PMID   27010681. S2CID   207432875.
  51. "What's Holding Back Mobile Phones for Education?". Stanford Social Innovation Review Blog. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 11 February 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2013.
  52. Sharples, M. (2000). "The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning". Computers & Education. 34 (3–4): 177–193. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.359.8991 . doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00044-5.
  53. Moore, J. (2009). "A portable document search engine to support off-line mobile learning". Proceedings of IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning. Barcelona, Spain.
  54. Masters, K.; Ng'ambi D. (2007). "After the broadcast: disrupting health sciences' students' lives with SMS". Proceedings of IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning. Lisbon, Portugal. pp. 171–175. ISBN   978-972-8924-36-2.
  55. Masters, K. (2005). "Low-key m-learning: a realistic introduction of m-learning to developing countries". Seeing, Understanding, Learning in the Mobile Age. Budapest, Hungary, April 2005.{{cite conference}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  56. Ko, Eddie H. T.; Chiu, Dickson K. W.; Lo, Patrick; Ho, Kevin K. W. (1 September 2015). "Comparative Study on m-Learning Usage Among LIS Students from Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan". The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 41 (5): 567–577. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.005. hdl: 10722/214676 .
  57. 1 2 Singh, Mandeep (2010). "M-learning: A New Approach to Learn Better". International Journal of Education and Allied Sciences. 2 (2): 65–72.
  58. Feser, J. (2010, April). mLearning is not eLearning on a Mobile Device