Military build-up in Southeast Asia

Last updated

Military build-up in Southeast Asia has been a noticeable trend, as shown by force modernization, although there is not necessarily political will to improve military effectiveness. The phenomenon has been attributed to various factors, including protecting economic interest, self-reliance in the reduction of US commitment in the region, domestic and foreign tensions, and the need to replace colonial era material, but also some non-military related factors such as national prestige, political corruption, etc.

Contents

Almost all Southeast Asian nations modernized their militaries since 1975, the ending year of the Vietnam War, and continued since then, even though the process was slowed after the 1997 Asian financial crisis. During this period, military personnel, tanks, armored personnel carriers (APCs), medium-range howitzers, missile-armed naval vessels, combat helicopters and combat aircraft increased and modernized. However, experts pointed out that this still did not fit the definition of an arms race.

Southeast Asia had seen an increase in absolute defense spending, the biggest increase compared to other regions of the world, even though they are relatively unchanged in proportion to the country's GDP. The South China Sea dispute was cited by some analysts as the motive, but others pointed to steady military expenditure per capita and relatively small in change of military inventory compared to old equipment replaced.

Statistics

FlagCountryActive militaryReserve militaryParamilitaryTotalPer 1,000 capita
(total)
Per 1,000 capita
(active)
Flag of Brunei.svg Brunei [1] 7,2007005008,40018.616
Flag of Cambodia.svg Cambodia [2] 124,300067,000191,30011.67.6
Flag of Indonesia.svg Indonesia [3] 395,500400,000280,0001,075,5004.11.5
Flag of Laos.svg Laos [4] 29,1000100,000129,10017.84
Flag of Malaysia.svg Malaysia [5] [lower-alpha 1] 113,00051,600267,200431,80013.63.6
Flag of Myanmar.svg Myanmar [6] 406,0000107,000513,0009.27.3
Flag of the Philippines.svg Philippines [7] 142,350131,00061,100334,4503.21.3
Flag of Singapore.svg Singapore [8] 72,500312,5008,400393,40065.612.1
Flag of Thailand.svg Thailand [9] 360,850200,000138,700699,55010.25.3
Flag of Vietnam.svg Vietnam [10] 482,00005,040,0005,522,00056.95
Countries [lower-alpha 2]
Military budget
(US$ bn) [lower-alpha 3]
AWS
Sources
Flag of Brunei.svg  Brunei 0
.5730000004000000 [13]
Flag of Cambodia.svg  Cambodia 0
.4462000000000051400 [14]
Flag of Indonesia.svg  Indonesia 7
.093780500111805974500 [15]
Flag of Laos.svg  Laos 0
.024250000000001200 [16]
Flag of Malaysia 23px.svg  Malaysia 5
.034800002402673200 [17]
Flag of Myanmar.svg  Myanmar 2
.431850000420215527 TC 0 [18]
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines 2
.09000001000222700 [19]
Flag of Singapore.svg  Singapore 10
.0163040066061262509 [20]
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand 5
.692881100107001434700 [21]
Flag of East Timor.svg  Timor-Leste 0
.0720000000000000 [22]
Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam 6
.2180000004606974700 [23]

Regional overview

Noticeable modernization trends in Southeast Asia are acquiring of technological sophistication, such as guided munitions, and investment in command, control, communications and computer processing, as well as intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance systems (C4ISR). Multi-role fighter aircraft, maritime reconnaissance aircraft, modern missiles (including anti-ship missiles, beyond visual range air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground missiles, tactical ground-to-ground missiles), modern artillery systems, submarines and warships equipped with the new electronics and anti-ship missiles, including Scud missiles, late-model MiG 29, F16, F18 and Su-27 jet fighters, MRLS systems, and modern frigates armed with Harpoon and Exocet missiles became more widespread. However, any regional nation seem not to be able to adopt Revolution in military affairs (RMA) due to lack of military resource, technology and armed force specialist. Almost every military increased its conventional capabilities, while archipelago nations adopted rapid deployment. Navies tend to cover its lack of mine counter-measures, maritime surveillance, offshore patrol and anti-submarine capabilities. Another notable trend is to acquire advanced fighters, with Singapore being the first to introduce fourth-generation jet fighters. [24] :24–8

Southeast Asia was the fastest-growing military spending region in the world between 2009 and 2018. [25] :ix Between 2009 and 2018, total regional spending was increased by 33 percent from $30.8 billion to $41.0 billion (constant 2017 US dollars). The region's share of global arms import increased from 5.8 percent in 1999–2007 to 8.1 percent in the period 1999–2018. [25] :10 China's rising to a regional military power and aggression in the South China Sea was cited as the motive for this period, and countries that are parties to the conflict saw the largest increase. Even though the proportion of military spending to each country's GDP remained constant and still did not fit the definition of arms race, the action-reaction pattern and low trust among the nations with lack of regional dispute resolution mechanisms meaning that there could be a risk of misunderstanding in the future. [25] :ix–x

In official defense policy documents often cited terrorist, armed rebels, pirates, smugglers and organized crime, including humanitarian assistance and disaster relief as the reasons of arms acquisition. However, the acquisition of tanker aircraft, combat aircraft, anti-submarine warfare aircraft, air-to-ground missiles, air defense systems, coastal defense systems, submarines, and surface combat ships, as well as amphibious assault landing ships, were the evidence that the nations perceived foreign threats. The equipment can engage with foreign threat far from home country, and could be seen by neighbors as "aggressive". [25] :7–8

There is also a number of factors, even unreasonable, to arms acquisition, as in the countries with strong military influence in politics. Myanmar's military spending has been decreased after 2015 political reform, but the opposite is true for Thailand after the 2014 coup. [25] :8–9

Military spending of Southeast Asian nations, 2009–18 [25] :11
Country%ChangeNumbers of years increased vs. decreased
SEA33.133.1
 
Increase2.svg 7, Decrease2.svg 3
Flag of Brunei.svg  Brunei -7.9
 
Increase2.svg 2, Decrease2.svg 8
Flag of Cambodia.svg  Cambodia 190.6190.6
 
Increase2.svg 10, Decrease2.svg 0
Flag of Indonesia.svg  Indonesia 99.599.5
 
Increase2.svg 7, Decrease2.svg 3
Flag of Laos.svg  Laos N/AIncrease2.svg 4, Decrease2.svg 1 (incomplete data)
Flag of Malaysia 23px.svg  Malaysia -18.5
 
Increase2.svg 4, Decrease2.svg 6
Flag of Myanmar.svg  Myanmar N/AIncrease2.svg 3, Decrease2.svg 3 (incomplete data)
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines 50.350.3
 
Increase2.svg 6, Decrease2.svg 4
Flag of Singapore.svg  Singapore 14.314.3
 
Increase2.svg 6, Decrease2.svg 4
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand 15.615.6
 
Increase2.svg 8, Decrease2.svg 2
Flag of East Timor.svg  Timor-Leste -63.4
 
Increase2.svg 3, Decrease2.svg 7
Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam 75.575.5
 
Increase2.svg 8, Decrease2.svg 2

By country

Brunei

The country has its share of military spending relative to its GDP higher than most SEA nations, but fluctuation of oil price means that it had to scale down its spending. Most of its imports were ships and naval weapons. [25] :20

Cambodia

Between 2009 and 2018, Cambodia increased its military spending every year. Amount to $525.1 million in 2018, the spending accounted for an average of 2.1 percent in 2015–18. A border issue with Thailand in 2008 and 2011 is the motive. Moreover, increased political influence of the military since 2017 may likely also played a role. The country's military inventory did not change much during the period, only to replace decommissioned weapons. By 2018, the country had shifted more to land weapons, although it is subjected to change in the future. [25] :21–3

Indonesia

Indonesia saw the necessity to modernize its armed forces from Communist takeover of Vietnam in 1975 and the poor performance in its invasion of East Timor in 1976. After the declaration of EEZ in the 1980s, the modernization process has concentrated on improving maritime security by developing its naval, air force, and rapid deployment capabilities, considering its geographical features as a large archipelago, sea lanes and waterways. Even though it would not to want to lag behind Singapore, but it appeared relaxed for its proportion of defense spending. The average annual spending in the 1990s was about 1.5% of its GDP, the lowest compared to its neighbors, showing its priority on economic development and declining status of the military in the post-Suharto era. The emphasis on modern modernization efforts was on its marine corps and navy, with construction of a major naval base in Teluk Rate. [24] :15–8

The country increased its spending sharply in 2009–13, accounting to 109 percent increase. However, since then the share of military spending to the country's GDP was decreased in order to balance its budget. Its priority is to replace older systems, mostly acquiring new combat aircraft and warships, and one goal of its defense policy is to expand domestic arms production with deals include licensed production and some level of technological transfer. [25] :23–5 Its long-term plans include up to 230 new combat aircraft, several dozen frigates and up to 12 submarines by 2030, even though it seems not possible given the current spending rate. [25] :26–7

In 2016, the country is the strongest military in SEA, its inventory include some of the most modern weapons from the West and Russia, including Russian Sukhoi-27/30 jets, American F-16s, German Type 209 submarines, Leopard II RI main battle tanks, and Ukrainian BTR-4M amphibious armored personnel carriers. [26]

Laos

The military spending data of Laos was kept secret, but the amount is the second lowest in the region. The number is likely to increase when, threatened by Cambodia, it ordered new aircraft and tanks in 2017 and 2018. [26] :27–8

Malaysia

The Malaysian Armed Force was experienced in counter-insurgency and jungle warfare from multi-decade long Communist insurgency. Recognizing its vulnerabilities from its long coastlines and offshore oil and gas fields as well as regional situations, the country began military build-up program PERISTA in 1979. Analysts commented on its will to catch up with its neighbor on conventional capabilities. Apart from being halted in 1997 economic crisis and its aftermath, the modernization was continuous and show determination of develop all-round capabilities and counter Singaporean build-up. The result would be an armed force with enhanced maritime security and power projection capabilities. [24] :8–12

Malaysia allocated military budget according to its economy which fluctuated in the recent years. It remained focus on naval buildups, and it published a long-term plan for improving air force capabilities. [25] :28–32

Myanmar

The military of Myanmar was neglected until 1988 coup. The military junta then underwent a modernization program aimed at covering its obsolete weapons and increase the manpower. However, the program had been a quantitative expansion. Even though it managed to subdue various ethnic insurgencies, its military is still considered weak compared to its neighbors. Its priority was given to buying of cheap weapon systems. But its investment on local arms industry resulted in ability to produce light weapons, light armored vehicles, land mines, mortars and ammunition. It increasingly focused outwardly to Thailand's growing military capabilities and China's influence over the country. [24] :18–9

Myanmar's spending data was incomplete as the case of Laos'. Its spending is likely to have decreased after civilian government since 2015, and Western countries enforced arms embargo is gradually lifted in practice. Its main security problems are still ongoing internal conflict, but recent maritime conflict with Bangladesh drive naval spending. It also expressed interest in developing its own arms industry and technological transfer. [25] :31–2

Philippines

The Philippines was preoccupied with internal insurgencies and factionalism, coupled with a military alliance with the US and continued presence of naval and air bases meant that there was no pressure of military modernization. After the decreased US aid and conflict in the Spratly Islands, Military Modernization Bill was signed into law in 1995, but the actual program was launched in 1999, partly due to the economic crisis. [24] :23–4

Its military spending increased by 50.3 percent between 2009 and 2018 in real terms, however, its economic burden remained stable. The increase was in part due to higher salary of servicemen. President Duterte's priority was on territorial defense. Due to criticism of Duterte's policies, some Western countries refused to export weapons to the country. It then shifted attention to make deals with Russia, China and Israel. Its inventory is one of the most outdated in the region, and the Revised AFP Modernization Act of 2013 outlined its effort to modernize its armed force by 2027. Eighty-seven percent of arms imports were aircraft or ships. [25] :32–5

Singapore

Singapore has developed its military continuously, not being halted by 1997 crisis. Its leadership considered the armed forces necessary to act as a deterrent, given the country's status as a city-state in a volatile region. It embraced the idea of RMA and enhanced its military technologies. Singapore was the most powerful military in Southeast Asia as of 2004, and there is a continuous political will and funds to do modernize its military. Apart from importing new vehicles into its army, navy and air force, its army also introduced locally built infantry fighting vehicles. [24] :5–8

During the period of 2009 to 2018, the country allocated a percentage of its GDP to military spending unchanged. It had been the region's largest arms importer, and was ranked top four in Global Militarization Index by Bonn International Center for Conversion since 2007. The country has a well-developed arms industry with the ability to produce locally-made armoured vehicles, artillery and ships, some of which also exported. Singaporean air force is the most capable of long distance action. Singapore has been a participant in the US F-35 programme since 2003. [25] :37–8

Thailand

Thailand had received much military aid from the US in the Vietnam War era. The Communist victory in 1975 and subsequent US withdrawal from the country boosted its military modernization efforts. Domestic factors also played a role: it faced multi-decade long Communist insurgency and infighting in and among its uniformed units vying for more resources. Since the 1990s, the country focused on improving the navy to protect the interest in its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The purchase of an aircraft carrier Chakri Naruebet indicated its ambition of developing a blue-water capabilities, even though prestige was also a contributing factor. Reform efforts were underway, where all the services were downsized and better-trained. Purchase of artillery, IFVs, tanks, submarines, fighter aircraft and frigates seemed to be its priority. The country often opted for buying second-hand weapon systems or upgrading its existing equipment. The effort was in part due to its worry of losing pace to Malaysia. [24] :12–5

Military corruption is well documented in Thailand. An average of 15–20% of commissions on arms sales was reported. [24] :34 Domestic political factors also played a role in the allocation of budget when the civilian government repay the navy who did not join the military junta of 1991. [24] :33 Defense ministers often cited lagging behind in number of submarines as the reason for it to have ones of its own. [25] :8

Between 2009 and 2018, Thailand's military spending increased by 16 percent in real terms, but the share to its GDP was decreased. However, after the 2014 coup, military spending was increased at a greater pace, and is likely to continue by its 20-year national strategy roadmap. Western reluctance to export its arms to Thailand brought the country to accept deals from China, though there was no formal arms embargo. Its largest investment of major weapons since 2010 was the three planned S-26T submarines from China. The volume of its military inventory only marginally increase, as older weapons were decommissioned. [25] :39–41 Its modern equipment include F-16s and Saab JAS 39 Gripen multi-role aircraft, T-84 Oplot-M main battle tank, Knox-class and Type 025T and Type 053HT missile frigates. [26]

Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste set its military budget to below 1 percent of GDP, and sharply fall in 2018. The only known major arms deliveries to the countries was patrol craft from China and South Korea in 2010–11. [25] :41–2

Vietnam

In the aftermath of Vietnam War, Vietnam has increased military capabilities following of captured US materiel. However, when the Soviet Union who long supplied it with ammunition and equipment cut off its support, and the stalemate of Cambodian Civil War prompted its leadership to demobilize and shift away from forward deployment. In the 1990s, the country did not undergo same scale of modernization as Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Myanmar. [24] :19–22

The figure of military spending was a state secret, but estimated to be increased steadily, amounting to 75 percent increase in real terms during 2009 and 2018. However, there were also reports of off-budget spending. Vietnam has military cooperation with India and bought many of its new weapons. Its personnel are being trained by Australia and Japan. The local arms industry received foreign support and currently is available to produce foreign design warships. The China threat remains the focus of the country's effort. It has modernized and expanded its navy, which effectively acquire a whole new navy. The new submarines and modern frigates gave the navy with blue-water capabilities. [25] :42–5

Notes

  1. The paramilitary forces of Malaysia includes 240,000 reservists from the People's Volunteer Corps.
  2. All data apart from the number of nuclear weapons is taken from The Military Balance (2017 ). [11]
  3. Budget is annual
  4. Fixed-wing aircraft with combat capability
  5. Includes helicopters that have some attacking capabilities i.e. 'multi-role helicopters'

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hellenic Armed Forces</span> Military forces of Greece

The Hellenic Armed Forces are the military forces of Greece. They consist of the Hellenic Army, the Hellenic Navy, and the Hellenic Air Force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korean People's Army</span> Combined military forces of North Korea

The Korean People's Army encompasses the combined military forces of North Korea and the armed wing of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK). The KPA consists of five branches: the Ground Force, the Naval Force, the Air Force, Strategic Force, and the Special Operation Force. It is commanded by the WPK Central Military Commission, which is chaired by the WPK general secretary, and the president of the State Affairs; both posts are currently headed by Kim Jong Un.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">People's Liberation Army Navy</span> Maritime service branch of the Chinese Peoples Liberation Army

The People's Liberation Army Navy is the maritime service branch of the People's Liberation Army, and the largest navy per number of ships in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian Armed Forces</span> Military forces of the Russian Federation

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, commonly referred to as the Russian Armed Forces, are the military of Russia. In terms of active-duty personnel, they are the world's fifth-largest military force, with 1.15 million and at least two million reserve personnel. According to the United States' Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), "Russia plans to expand its active personnel force to 1.5 million by 2026, which will make it the third largest in the world, after China and India." The country has three primary branches of service: the Ground Forces, the Navy, and the Aerospace Forces, as well as two independent arms of service: the Strategic Rocket Forces and Airborne Forces. In addition, the Special Operations Forces Command was established in 2013, with an estimated strength in 2022 of 1,000, possibly with additional supporting staff.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armed Forces of Saudi Arabia</span> Combined military forces of Saudi Arabia

The Saudi Arabian Armed Forces (SAAF), also known as the Royal Saudi Armed Forces, is part of the military forces of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It consists of the Royal Saudi Army, the Royal Saudi Navy, the Royal Saudi Air Force, the Royal Saudi Air Defense, and the Royal Saudi Strategic Missile Force. The King of Saudi Arabia is the Supreme commander-in-chief of all the Military Forces and forms military policy with the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior. The five Armed Forces are among eight military forces of Saudi Arabia, with the others including the Royal Saudi National Guard, the Royal Saudi Guard Regiment and the Royal Saudi Border Guards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republic of China Armed Forces</span> Combined armed forces of the Republic of China

The Republic of China Armed Forces are the armed forces of the Republic of China (ROC) that once ruled Mainland China and now currently restricted to its territorial jurisdictions of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu Islands. They consist of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Military Police Force. The military is under the civilian control of the Ministry of National Defense, a cabinet-level agency overseen by the Legislative Yuan.

The United States Armed Forces are the military forces of the United States. The armed forces consist of six service branches: the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard. All six armed services are among the eight uniformed services of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Bolivarian Armed Forces of Venezuela</span> Combined military forces of Venezuela

The National Bolivarian Armed Forces of Venezuela are controlled by the Commander-in-Chief and the Minister of Defense. In addition to the army, navy, and air force there is also a national guard and national militia primarily focused on internal security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">People's Liberation Army</span> Combined military forces of the Peoples Republic of China

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) is the armed wing of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the principal military force of the People's Republic of China. The PLA consists of four services — Ground Force, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force — and four arms — Aerospace Force, Cyberspace Force, Information Support Force, and Joint Logistics Support Force. It is led by the Central Military Commission (CMC) with its chairman as commander-in-chief.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">People's Liberation Army Air Force</span> Aerial service branch of the Chinese Peoples Liberation Army

The People's Liberation Army Air Force, also referred to as the Chinese Air Force (中国空军) or the People's Air Force (人民空军), is an aerial service branch of the People's Liberation Army. The Air Force is composed of five sub-branches: aviation, ground-based air defense, radar, Airborne Corps, and other support elements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Islamic Republic of Iran Navy</span> Maritime service branch of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army

The Islamic Republic of Iran Navy or Iranian Navy, officially abbreviated NEDAJA, is the naval warfare service branch of Iran's regular military, the Islamic Republic of Iran Army (Artesh). It is one of Iran's two maritime military branches, alongside the Navy of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear triad</span> Set of three types of nuclear-strike weapons

A nuclear triad is a three-pronged military force structure of land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and strategic bombers with nuclear bombs and missiles. Countries build nuclear triads to eliminate an enemy's ability to destroy a nation's nuclear forces in a first-strike attack, which preserves their own ability to launch a second strike and therefore increases their nuclear deterrence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian Armed Forces</span> Combined military forces of India

The Indian Armed Forces are the military forces of the Republic of India. It consists of three professional uniformed services: the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force. Additionally, the Indian Armed Forces are supported by the Central Armed Police Forces, Indian Coast Guard and Special Frontier Force and various inter-service commands and institutions such as the Strategic Forces Command, the Andaman and Nicobar Command and the Integrated Defence Staff. The President of India is the Supreme Commander of the Indian Armed Forces but the executive authority and responsibility for national security is vested in the Prime Minister of India and their chosen Cabinet Ministers. The Indian Armed Forces are under the management of the Ministry of Defence of the Government of India. With strength of over 1.4 million active personnel, it is the world's second-largest military force and has the world's largest volunteer army. It also has the third-largest defence budget in the world. The Global Firepower Index report lists it as the fourth most-powerful military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">People's Liberation Army Navy Submarine Force</span> Submarine service of the Peoples Liberation Army Navy

The People's Liberation Army Navy Submarine Force (PLANSF) is the submarine service of the People's Liberation Army Navy. It consists of all types of submarines in operational service organized into three fleets: the North Sea Fleet, the East Sea Fleet, and the South Sea Fleet. Submarines have long been one of the three focuses of the People's Liberation Army Navy, and when the decision was made in late 2006 to concentrate on building other principal surface combatants to strengthen the air defense and to further delay the construction of aircraft carriers due to insufficient air cover, submarines will continue to play the lead dominant role in the assault force for the PLAN. Currently, PLANSF operates a fleet of 66 submarines which include nuclear as well as conventional submarines.

The arms industry of Russia, also known as the defense industry of Russia is a strategically important sector and a large employer in the Russian Federation. As of 2024, it employs approximately 3.5 million people nationwide and accounts for 20% of all manufacturing jobs in Russia.

The military modernization program of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) which began in the late 1970s had three major focuses. First, under the political leadership of 3rd paramount leader Deng Xiaoping, the military became disengaged from civilian politics and, for the most part, resumed the political quiescence that characterized its pre-Cultural Revolution role. Deng reestablished civilian control over the military by appointing his supporters to key military leadership positions, by reducing the scope of the PLA's domestic non-military role, and by revitalizing the party political structure and ideological control system within the PLA.

The national security of China is the coordination of a variety of organizations, including law enforcement, military, paramilitary, governmental, and intelligence agencies that aim to ensure China's national security. China considers three factors in its national security: national sovereignty, security, and development interests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polish Armed Forces</span> Combined military forces of Poland

The Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland, Also called the Polish Armed Forces And popularly called Wojsko Polskie in Poland are the national armed forces of the Republic of Poland. The name has been used since the early 19th century, but can also be applied to earlier periods. The Polish Legions and the Blue Army, composed of Polish volunteers from America and those who switched sides from the Central Powers, were formed during World War I. In the war's aftermath, the Polish Army was reformed from the remnants of the partitioning powers' forces and expanded significantly during the Polish–Soviet War of 1920.

The National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015 was published by the British government during the second Cameron ministry on 23 November 2015 to outline the United Kingdom's defence strategy up to 2025. It identified key threats to the UK and the capabilities it required to address them.

The defense industry of South Korea is the main supplier of armaments to the Republic of Korea's Armed Forces. Originally reliant on the United States to supply weapons to its armed forces, South Korea started to manufacture its own weapons through the country's modernization and military reforms. Today, South Korea enjoys a robust defense industry and is the world's 8th largest weapons exporter.

References

  1. IISS 2019, p. 253
  2. IISS 2019, pp. 254
  3. IISS 2019, pp. 272
  4. IISS 2019, pp. 287
  5. IISS 2019, pp. 288
  6. IISS 2019, pp. 292
  7. IISS 2019, pp. 300
  8. IISS 2019, pp. 303
  9. IISS 2019, pp. 310
  10. IISS 2019, pp. 314
  11. The Military Balance. Vol. 115. Routledge. 10 February 2016. ISSN   0459-7222.
  12. "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance". Arms Control Association. July 2019. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  13. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 234–235.
  14. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 235–237.
  15. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 253–257.
  16. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 267–268.
  17. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 268–271.
  18. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 272–274.
  19. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 280–282.
  20. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 282–285.
  21. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 290–293.
  22. Complex crises call for adaptable and durable capabilities (2015), pp. 5–8.
  23. Chapter Six: Asia (2015), pp. 293–296.
  24. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Tan, Andrew (January 2004). "Force Modernisation Trends in Southeast Asia" (PDF). RSIS Working Papers (59). Retrieved 2020-08-25.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Wezeman, Siemon T. (December 2019). ARMS FLOWS TO SOUTH EAST ASIA (PDF). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved 26 August 2020.
  26. 1 2 3 "Which Military Ranks Southeast Asia's Strongest? | Seasia.co". Good News from Southeast Asia. Retrieved 26 August 2020.

Bibliography