Mirror matter

Last updated

In physics, mirror matter, also called shadow matter or Alice matter, is a hypothetical counterpart to ordinary matter. [1]

Contents

Overview

Modern physics deals with three basic types of spatial symmetry: reflection, rotation, and translation. The known elementary particles respect rotation and translation symmetry but do not respect mirror reflection symmetry (also called P-symmetry or parity). Of the four fundamental interactionselectromagnetism, the strong interaction, the weak interaction, and gravity—only the weak interaction breaks parity.

Parity violation in weak interactions was first postulated by Tsung Dao Lee and Chen Ning Yang [2] in 1956 as a solution to the τ-θ puzzle. In consultation with the experimental physicist Chien-Shiung Wu a number of possibilities were proposed to test whether the weak interaction was in fact invariant under parity. One of the group's suggestions involved monitoring the decay of Cobalt-60,

to determine whether the electrons it emitted were radiated isotropically, like the two gamma rays. Wu performed this experiment at the National Bureau of Standards in Washington, D.C. after nine months of work. Contrary to most expectations, in December 1956 she and her team observed anisotropic electron radiation, proving that the weak interactions of the known particles violate parity. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

However, parity symmetry can be restored as a fundamental symmetry of nature if the particle content is enlarged so that every particle has a mirror partner. The theory in its modern form was described in 1991, [9] although the basic idea dates back further. [2] [10] [11] Mirror particles interact amongst themselves in the same way as ordinary particles, except where ordinary particles have left-handed interactions, mirror particles have right-handed interactions. In this way, it turns out that mirror reflection symmetry can exist as an exact symmetry of nature, provided that a "mirror" particle exists for every ordinary particle. Parity can also be spontaneously broken depending on the Higgs potential. [12] [13] While in the case of unbroken parity symmetry the masses of particles are the same as their mirror partners, in case of broken parity symmetry the mirror partners are lighter or heavier.

Mirror matter, if it exists, would interact weakly in strength with ordinary matter. This is because the forces between mirror particles are mediated by mirror bosons. With the exception of the graviton, none of the known bosons can be identical to their mirror partners. The only way mirror matter can interact with ordinary matter via forces other than gravity is via kinetic mixing of mirror bosons with ordinary bosons. These interactions can only be very weak. Mirror particles have therefore been suggested as candidates for the inferred dark matter in the universe. [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]

In another context, [19] mirror matter has been proposed to give rise to an effective Higgs mechanism responsible for the electroweak symmetry breaking. In such a scenario, mirror fermions acquire masses on the order of 1 TeV since they interact with an additional gauge interaction not only becoming strong around the characteristic energy scale of the electroweak interactions but also being theoretically unified with Standard Model interactions under a larger gauge symmetry near the Planck energy scale. In order to emphasize the distinction of this model from the ones above, [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] these mirror particles are usually called katoptrons [19] [20] [21] within the context of the Katoptron Model and they are expected to decay to Standard Model particles shortly after their creation.

Observational effects

Abundance

Mirror matter could have been diluted to unobservably low densities during the inflation epoch. Sheldon Glashow has shown that if at some high energy scale particles exist which interact strongly with both ordinary and mirror particles, radiative corrections will lead to a mixing between photons and mirror photons. [22] This mixing has the effect of giving mirror electric charges a very small ordinary electric charge. Another effect of photon–mirror photon mixing is that it induces oscillations between positronium and mirror positronium. Positronium could then turn into mirror positronium and then decay into mirror photons.

The mixing between photons and mirror photons could be present in tree-level Feynman diagrams or arise as a consequence of quantum corrections due to the presence of particles that carry both ordinary and mirror charges. In the latter case, the quantum corrections have to vanish at the one and two loop-level Feynman diagrams, otherwise the predicted value of the kinetic mixing parameter would be larger than experimentally allowed. [22]

An experiment to measure this effect was being planned in November 2003. [23]

Dark matter

If mirror matter does exist in large abundances in the universe and if it interacts with ordinary matter via photon—mirror photon mixing, then this could be detected in dark matter direct detection experiments such as DAMA/NaI and its successor DAMA/LIBRA. In fact, it is one of the few dark matter candidates which can explain the positive DAMA/NaI dark matter signal whilst still being consistent with the null results of other dark matter experiments. [24] [25]

Electromagnetic effects

Mirror matter may also be detected in electromagnetic field penetration experiments [26] and there would also be consequences for planetary science [27] [28] and astrophysics. [29]

GZK puzzle

Mirror matter could also be responsible for the GZK puzzle. Topological defects in the mirror sector could produce mirror neutrinos which can oscillate to ordinary neutrinos. [30] Another possible way to evade the GZK bound is via neutron–mirror neutron oscillations. [31] [32] [33] [34]

Gravitational effects

If mirror matter is present in the universe with sufficient abundance then its gravitational effects can be detected. Because mirror matter is analogous to ordinary matter, it is then to be expected that a fraction of the mirror matter exists in the form of mirror galaxies, mirror stars, mirror planets etc. These objects can be detected using gravitational microlensing. [35] One would also expect that some fraction of stars have mirror objects as their companion. In such cases one should be able to detect periodic Doppler shifts in the spectrum of the star. [17] There are some hints that such effects may already have been observed. [36]

Neutron to mirror-neutron oscillations

Neutrons which are electrically neutral particles of ordinary matter could oscillate into its mirror partner, the mirror neutron. [37] Recently experiments looked for neutrons vanishing into the mirror world. Most experiments found no signal and hence gave limits on transition rates to the mirror state, [38] [39] [40] [41] one paper claimed signals. [42] Current research looks for signals where an applied magnetic field adjust the energy level of the neutron to the mirror world. [43] [44] This energy difference can be interpreted due to a mirror magnetic field present in the mirror world or a mass difference of the neutron and its mirror partner. Such a transition to the mirror world could also solve the neutron lifetime puzzle. [45] Experiments searching for mirror neutron oscillation are ongoing at the Paul Scherrer Institute's UCN source, Switzerland, Institut Laue-Langevin, France and Spallation Neutron Source, USA.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proton decay</span> Hypothetical particle decay process of a proton

In particle physics, proton decay is a hypothetical form of particle decay in which the proton decays into lighter subatomic particles, such as a neutral pion and a positron. The proton decay hypothesis was first formulated by Andrei Sakharov in 1967. Despite significant experimental effort, proton decay has never been observed. If it does decay via a positron, the proton's half-life is constrained to be at least 1.67×1034 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Standard Model</span> Theory of forces and subatomic particles

The Standard Model of particle physics is the theory describing three of the four known fundamental forces in the universe and classifying all known elementary particles. It was developed in stages throughout the latter half of the 20th century, through the work of many scientists worldwide, with the current formulation being finalized in the mid-1970s upon experimental confirmation of the existence of quarks. Since then, proof of the top quark (1995), the tau neutrino (2000), and the Higgs boson (2012) have added further credence to the Standard Model. In addition, the Standard Model has predicted various properties of weak neutral currents and the W and Z bosons with great accuracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Technicolor (physics)</span> Hypothetical model through which W and Z bosons acquire mass

Technicolor theories are models of physics beyond the Standard Model that address electroweak gauge symmetry breaking, the mechanism through which W and Z bosons acquire masses. Early technicolor theories were modelled on quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the "color" theory of the strong nuclear force, which inspired their name.

An axion is a hypothetical elementary particle originally postulated by the Peccei–Quinn theory in 1977 to resolve the strong CP problem in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). If axions exist and have low mass within a specific range, they are of interest as a possible component of cold dark matter.

R-parity is a concept in particle physics. In the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, baryon number and lepton number are no longer conserved by all of the renormalizable couplings in the theory. Since baryon number and lepton number conservation have been tested very precisely, these couplings need to be very small in order not to be in conflict with experimental data. R-parity is a symmetry acting on the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) fields that forbids these couplings and can be defined as

In particle physics, majorons are a hypothetical type of Goldstone boson that are conjectured to mediate the neutrino mass violation of lepton number or BL in certain high energy collisions such as

In supergravity theories combining general relativity and supersymmetry, the gravitino is the gauge fermion supersymmetric partner of the hypothesized graviton. It has been suggested as a candidate for dark matter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baryon asymmetry</span> Imbalance of matter and antimatter in the observable universe

In physical cosmology, the baryon asymmetry problem, also known as the matter asymmetry problem or the matter–antimatter asymmetry problem, is the observed imbalance in baryonic matter and antibaryonic matter in the observable universe. Neither the standard model of particle physics nor the theory of general relativity provides a known explanation for why this should be so, and it is a natural assumption that the universe is neutral with all conserved charges. The Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Since this does not seem to have been the case, it is likely some physical laws must have acted differently or did not exist for matter and/or antimatter. Several competing hypotheses exist to explain the imbalance of matter and antimatter that resulted in baryogenesis. However, there is as of yet no consensus theory to explain the phenomenon, which has been described as "one of the great mysteries in physics".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christopher T. Hill</span> American theoretical physicist

Christopher T. Hill is an American theoretical physicist at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory who did undergraduate work in physics at M.I.T., and graduate work at Caltech. Hill's Ph.D. thesis, "Higgs Scalars and the Nonleptonic Weak Interactions" (1977) contains one of the first detailed discussions of the two-Higgs-doublet model and its impact upon weak interactions. His work mainly focuses on new physics that can be probed in laboratory experiments or cosmology.

In theoretical physics, unparticle physics is a speculative theory that conjectures a form of matter that cannot be explained in terms of particles using the Standard Model of particle physics, because its components are scale invariant.

In particle physics, hexaquarks, alternatively known as sexaquarks, are a large family of hypothetical particles, each particle consisting of six quarks or antiquarks of any flavours. Six constituent quarks in any of several combinations could yield a colour charge of zero; for example a hexaquark might contain either six quarks, resembling two baryons bound together, or three quarks and three antiquarks. Once formed, dibaryons are predicted to be fairly stable by the standards of particle physics.

A strangelet is a hypothetical particle consisting of a bound state of roughly equal numbers of up, down, and strange quarks. An equivalent description is that a strangelet is a small fragment of strange matter, small enough to be considered a particle. The size of an object composed of strange matter could, theoretically, range from a few femtometers across to arbitrarily large. Once the size becomes macroscopic, such an object is usually called a strange star. The term "strangelet" originates with Edward Farhi and Robert Jaffe in 1984. Strangelets can convert matter to strange matter on contact. Strangelets have been suggested as a dark matter candidate.

Thomas Carlos Mehen is an American physicist. His research has consisted of primarily Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and the application of effective field theory to problems in hadronic physics. He has also worked on effective field theory for non-relativistic particles whose short range interactions are characterized by a large scattering length, as well as novel field theories which arise from unusual limits of string theory.

In particle physics, W′ and Z′ bosons refer to hypothetical gauge bosons that arise from extensions of the electroweak symmetry of the Standard Model. They are named in analogy with the Standard Model W and Z bosons.

High-precision experiments could reveal small previously unseen differences between the behavior of matter and antimatter. This prospect is appealing to physicists because it may show that nature is not Lorentz symmetric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hughes–Drever experiment</span>

Hughes–Drever experiments are spectroscopic tests of the isotropy of mass and space. Although originally conceived of as a test of Mach's principle, they are now understood to be an important test of Lorentz invariance. As in Michelson–Morley experiments, the existence of a preferred frame of reference or other deviations from Lorentz invariance can be tested, which also affects the validity of the equivalence principle. Thus these experiments concern fundamental aspects of both special and general relativity. Unlike Michelson–Morley type experiments, Hughes–Drever experiments test the isotropy of the interactions of matter itself, that is, of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The accuracy achieved makes this kind of experiment one of the most accurate confirmations of relativity .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern searches for Lorentz violation</span> Overview about the modern searches for Lorentz violation

Modern searches for Lorentz violation are scientific studies that look for deviations from Lorentz invariance or symmetry, a set of fundamental frameworks that underpin modern science and fundamental physics in particular. These studies try to determine whether violations or exceptions might exist for well-known physical laws such as special relativity and CPT symmetry, as predicted by some variations of quantum gravity, string theory, and some alternatives to general relativity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dark photon</span> Hypothetical force carrier particle connected to dark matter

The dark photon is a hypothetical hidden sector particle, proposed as a force carrier similar to the photon of electromagnetism but potentially connected to dark matter. In a minimal scenario, this new force can be introduced by extending the gauge group of the Standard Model of Particle Physics with a new abelian U(1) gauge symmetry. The corresponding new spin-1 gauge boson can then couple very weakly to electrically charged particles through kinetic mixing with the ordinary photon and could thus be detected. The dark photon can also interact with the Standard Model if some of the fermions are charged under the new abelian group. The possible charging arrangements are restricted by a number of consistency requirements such as anomaly cancellation and constraints coming from Yukawa matrices.

Eric George Adelberger is an American experimental nuclear physicist and gravitational metrologist.

Blayne Ryan Heckel is an American experimental physicist, known for his research involving precision measurements in atomic physics and gravitational physics. He is now a professor emeritus at the University of Washington in Seattle.

References

  1. Zyga, Lisa (2010-04-27). "Signs of dark matter may point to mirror matter candidate". Phys.org. Archived from the original on 2015-10-11. Retrieved 2023-11-24.
  2. 1 2 Lee, T. D.; Yang, C. N. (1956). "Question of Parity Conservation in Weak Interactions". Physical Review. 104 (1): 254–258. Bibcode:1956PhRv..104..254L. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.104.254 . (Erratum:  Bibcode:1957PhRv..106.1371L, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.106.1371)
  3. Wu, C. S.; Ambler, E.; Hayward, R. W.; Hoppes, D. D.; Hudson, R. P. (1957). "Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay". Physical Review. 105 (4): 1413–1415. Bibcode:1957PhRv..105.1413W. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.105.1413 .
  4. Garwin, Richard L.; Lederman, Leon M.; Weinrich, Marcel (1957). "Observations of the Failure of Conservation of Parity and Charge Conjugation in Meson Decays: The Magnetic Moment of the Free Muon". Physical Review. 105 (4): 1415–1417. Bibcode:1957PhRv..105.1415G. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.105.1415 .
  5. Friedman, Jerome I.; Telegdi, V. L. (1957). "Nuclear Emulsion Evidence for Parity Nonconservation in the Decay Chain π+→μ+→e+". Physical Review. 106 (6): 1290–1293. Bibcode:1957PhRv..106.1290F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.106.1290.
  6. Chiang, Tsai-Chien (2014). Madame Chien-Shiung Wu: The First Lady of Physics Research. World Scientific. pp. 136–137. ISBN   978-981-4374-84-2.
  7. Wu, C. S. (1973). Maglich, B. (ed.). Adventures in Experimental Physics: Gamma Volume. Princeton: World Science Communications. pp. 101–123. ASIN   B000ITLM9Q.
  8. Lee, T. D. (2006). "New Insights to Old Problems". arXiv: hep-ph/0605017 .
  9. Foot, R.; Lew, H.; Volkas, R.R. (1991). "A model with fundamental improper spacetime symmetries". Physics Letters B. 272 (1–2): 67–70. Bibcode:1991PhLB..272...67F. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91013-L.
  10. Kobzarev, I.; Okun, L.; Pomeranchuk, I. (1966). "On the possibility of observing mirror particles". Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics. 3: 837.
  11. Pavšič, Matej (1974). "External inversion, internal inversion, and reflection invariance". International Journal of Theoretical Physics. 9 (4): 229–244. arXiv: hep-ph/0105344 . Bibcode:1974IJTP....9..229P. doi:10.1007/BF01810695. S2CID   15736872.
  12. Berezhiani, Zurab G.; Mohapatra, Rabindra N. (1995). "Reconciling present neutrino puzzles: Sterile neutrinos as mirror neutrinos". Physical Review D. 52 (11): 6607–6611. arXiv: hep-ph/9505385 . Bibcode:1995PhRvD..52.6607B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6607. PMID   10019200. S2CID   11306189.
  13. Foot, Robert; Lew, Henry; Volkas, Raymond Robert (2000). "Unbroken versus broken mirror world: A tale of two vacua". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2000 (7): 032. arXiv: hep-ph/0006027 . Bibcode:2000JHEP...07..032F. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/07/032. S2CID   11013856.
  14. 1 2 Blinnikov, S. I.; Khlopov, M. Yu. (1982). "On possible effects of 'mirror' particles". Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics. 36: 472.
  15. 1 2 Blinnikov, S. I.; Khlopov, M. Yu. (1983). "Possible astronomical effects of mirror particles". Sov. Astron. 27: 371–375. Bibcode:1983SvA....27..371B.
  16. 1 2 Kolb E. W., Seckel M., Turner M. S. (1985). "The shadow world of superstring theories". Nature. 314 (6010): 415–419. Bibcode:1985Natur.314..415K. doi:10.1038/314415a0. S2CID   4353658.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. 1 2 3 Khlopov, M. Yu.; Beskin, G. M.; Bochkarev, N. E.; Pushtilnik, L. A.; Pushtilnik, S. A. (1991). "Observational physics of mirror world" (PDF). Astron. Zh. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 68: 42–57. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-06-05.
  18. 1 2 Hodges H. M. (1993). "Mirror baryons as the dark matter". Physical Review D. 47 (2): 456–459. Bibcode:1993PhRvD..47..456H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.456. PMID   10015599.
  19. 1 2 Triantaphyllou G (2001). "Mass generation and the dynamical role of the Katoptron group". Modern Physics Letters A. 16 (2): 53–62. arXiv: hep-ph/0010147 . Bibcode:2001MPLA...16...53T. doi:10.1142/S0217732301002274. S2CID   15689479.
  20. Triantaphyllou G., Zoupanos G. (2000). "Strongly interacting fermions from a higher dimensional unified gauge theory". Physics Letters B. 489 (3–4): 420–426. arXiv: hep-ph/0006262 . Bibcode:2000PhLB..489..420T. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.347.9373 . doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00942-4. S2CID   17505679.
  21. Triantaphyllou, G. (2016), "Mirror mesons at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)", Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 13, no. 35, pp. 115–144, arXiv: 1609.03404 , retrieved 2024-02-07
  22. 1 2 Glashow, S.L. (1986). "Positronium versus the mirror universe". Physics Letters B. 167 (1): 35–36. Bibcode:1986PhLB..167...35G. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90540-X.
  23. Gninenko, S. N. (2004). "An Apparatus to Search for Mirror Dark Matter". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 19 (23): 3833–3847. arXiv: hep-ex/0311031 . Bibcode:2004IJMPA..19.3833G. doi:10.1142/S0217751X04020105. S2CID   17721669.
  24. Foot, R. (2004). "Implications of the DAMA and CRESST experiments for mirror matter-type dark matter". Physical Review D. 69 (3): 036001. arXiv: hep-ph/0308254 . Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69c6001F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.036001. S2CID   14580403.
  25. Foot, R. (2004). "Reconciling the Positive Dama Annual Modulation Signal with the Negative Results of the CDSM II Experiment". Modern Physics Letters A. 19 (24): 1841–1846. arXiv: astro-ph/0405362 . Bibcode:2004MPLA...19.1841F. doi:10.1142/S0217732304015051. S2CID   18243354.
  26. Mitra, Saibal (2006). "Detecting dark matter in electromagnetic field penetration experiments". Physical Review D. 74 (4): 043532. arXiv: astro-ph/0605369 . Bibcode:2006PhRvD..74d3532M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043532. S2CID   119497509.
  27. Foot, R.; Mitra, S. (2003). "Mirror matter in the solar system: New evidence for mirror matter from Eros". Astroparticle Physics. 19 (6): 739–753. arXiv: astro-ph/0211067 . Bibcode:2003APh....19..739F. doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(03)00119-1. S2CID   17578958.
  28. Foot, R.; Silagadze, Z. K. (2001). "Do mirror planets exist in our solar system?". Acta Physica Polonica B. 32 (7): 2271. arXiv: astro-ph/0104251 . Bibcode:2001AcPPB..32.2271F.
  29. De Angelis, Alessandro; Pain, Reynald (2002). "Improved Limits on Photon Velocity Oscillations". Modern Physics Letters A. 17 (38): 2491–2496. arXiv: astro-ph/0205059 . Bibcode:2002MPLA...17.2491D. doi:10.1142/S021773230200926X. S2CID   3042840.
  30. Berezinsky, V.; Vilenkin, A. (2000). "Ultrahigh energy neutrinos from hidden-sector topological defects". Physical Review D. 62 (8): 083512. arXiv: hep-ph/9908257 . Bibcode:2000PhRvD..62h3512B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.083512. S2CID   204936092.
  31. Berezhiani, Zurab; Bento, Luís (2006). "Neutron–Mirror-Neutron Oscillations: How Fast Might They Be?". Physical Review Letters. 96 (8): 081801. arXiv: hep-ph/0507031 . Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96h1801B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.081801. PMID   16606167. S2CID   2171296.
  32. Berezhiani, Zurab; Bento, Luís (2006). "Fast neutron–mirror neutron oscillation and ultra high energy cosmic rays". Physics Letters B. 635 (5–6): 253–259. arXiv: hep-ph/0602227 . Bibcode:2006PhLB..635..253B. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.03.008. S2CID   119481860.
  33. Mohapatra, R.N.; Nasri, S.; Nussinov, S. (2005). "Some implications of neutron mirror neutron oscillation". Physics Letters B. 627 (1–4): 124–130. arXiv: hep-ph/0508109 . doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.101. S2CID   119028382.
  34. Pokotilovski, Yu.N. (2006). "On the experimental search for neutron → mirror neutron oscillations". Physics Letters B. 639 (3–4): 214–217. arXiv: nucl-ex/0601017 . Bibcode:2006PhLB..639..214P. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.06.005. S2CID   16896749.
  35. Mohapatra, R. N.; Teplitz, Vigdor L. (1999). "Mirror matter MACHOs". Physics Letters B. 462 (3–4): 302–309. arXiv: astro-ph/9902085 . Bibcode:1999PhLB..462..302M. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00789-3. S2CID   119427850.
  36. Foot, R. (1999). "Have mirror stars been observed?". Physics Letters B. 452 (1–2): 83–86. arXiv: astro-ph/9902065 . Bibcode:1999PhLB..452...83F. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00230-0. S2CID   11374130.
  37. Berezhiani, Zurab; Bento, Luis (2006-02-27). "Neutron - Mirror Neutron Oscillations: How Fast Might They Be?". Physical Review Letters. 96 (8): 081801. arXiv: hep-ph/0507031 . Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96h1801B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.081801. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   16606167. S2CID   2171296.
  38. Ban, G.; Bodek, K.; Daum, M.; Henneck, R.; Heule, S.; Kasprzak, M.; Khomutov, N.; Kirch, K.; Kistryn, S.; Knecht, A.; Knowles, P. (2007-10-19). "A direct experimental limit on neutron -- mirror neutron oscillations". Physical Review Letters. 99 (16): 161603. arXiv: 0705.2336 . Bibcode:2007PhRvL..99p1603B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.161603. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   17995237. S2CID   20503448.
  39. Abel, C.; Ayres, N. J.; Ban, G.; Bison, G.; Bodek, K.; Bondar, V.; Chanel, E.; Chiu, P.-J.; Crawford, C.; Daum, M.; Dinani, R. T. (January 2021). "A search for neutron to mirror-neutron oscillations". Physics Letters B. 812: 135993. arXiv: 2009.11046 . doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135993. S2CID   228076358.
  40. Serebrov, A. P.; Aleksandrov, E. B.; Dovator, N. A.; Dmitriev, S. P.; Fomin, A. K.; Geltenbort, P.; Kharitonov, A. G.; Krasnoschekova, I. A.; Lasakov, M. S.; Murashkin, A. N.; Shmelev, G. E. (May 2008). "Experimental search for neutron - mirror neutron oscillations using storage of ultracold neutrons". Physics Letters B. 663 (3): 181–185. arXiv: 0706.3600 . Bibcode:2008PhLB..663..181S. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.04.014. S2CID   119132581.
  41. Altarev, I.; Baker, C. A.; Ban, G.; Bodek, K.; Daum, M.; Fierlinger, P.; Geltenbort, P.; Green, K.; van der Grinten, M. G. D.; Gutsmiedl, E.; Harris, P. G. (2009-08-17). "Neutron to Mirror-Neutron Oscillations in the Presence of Mirror Magnetic Fields". Physical Review D. 80 (3): 032003. arXiv: 0905.4208 . Bibcode:2009PhRvD..80c2003A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.032003. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   7423799.
  42. Berezhiani, Z.; Biondi, R.; Geltenbort, P.; Krasnoshchekova, I. A.; Varlamov, V. E.; Vassiljev, A. V.; Zherebtsov, O. M. (2018-09-01). "New experimental limits on neutron – mirror neutron oscillations in the presence of mirror magnetic field". The European Physical Journal C. 78 (9): 717. arXiv: 1712.05761 . Bibcode:2018EPJC...78..717B. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6189-y. ISSN   1434-6044. S2CID   119250376.
  43. Ayres, N. J.; Berezhiani, Z.; Biondi, R.; Bison, G.; Bodek, K.; Bondar, V.; Chiu, P.-J.; Daum, M.; Dinani, R. T.; Doorenbos, C. B.; Emmenegger, S. (2021-10-31). "Improved search for neutron to mirror-neutron oscillations in the presence of mirror magnetic fields with a dedicated apparatus at the PSI UCN source". Symmetry. 14 (3): 503. arXiv: 2111.02794 . Bibcode:2022Symm...14..503A. doi: 10.3390/sym14030503 .
  44. Broussard, L. J.; Bailey, K. M.; Bailey, W. B.; Barrow, J. L.; Berry, K.; Blose, A.; Crawford, C.; Debeer-Schmitt, L.; Frost, M.; Galindo-Uribarri, A.; Gallmeier, F. X. (2019). "New search for mirror neutron regeneration". EPJ Web of Conferences. 219: 07002. arXiv: 1912.08264 . Bibcode:2019EPJWC.21907002B. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921907002. ISSN   2100-014X. S2CID   209405136.
  45. Berezhiani, Zurab (2019-06-10). "Neutron lifetime puzzle and neutron–mirror neutron oscillation". The European Physical Journal C. 79 (6): 484. arXiv: 1807.07906 . Bibcode:2019EPJC...79..484B. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6995-x. ISSN   1434-6052. S2CID   119232602.