Nascom

Last updated
Nascom
Nascom 2 Computer 1981.jpg
Nascom 3 Computer, September 1981
DeveloperChris Shelton [1]
Type single-board computer
Release dateNascom 1: 1977 (1977)
Nascom 2: 1979 (1979)
Nascom 3: 1981 (1981)

The Nascom 1 and 2 were single-board computer kits issued in the United Kingdom in 1977 and 1979, respectively, based on the Zilog Z80 and including a keyboard and video interface, a serial port that could be used to store data on a tape cassette using the Kansas City standard, and two 8-bit parallel ports. At that time, including a full keyboard and video display interface was uncommon, as most microcomputer kits were then delivered with only a hexadecimal keypad and seven-segment display. To minimize cost, the buyer had to assemble a Nascom by hand-soldering about 3,000 joints on the single circuit board. Later on, a pre-built, cased machine named Nascom 3 was available; this used the Nascom 2 board.

Contents

ModelNascom 1Nascom 2
IntroducedDecember 1977December 1979
MSRP (price) £197.50£225
CPU (μP) Zilog Z80 Zilog Z80A
CPU speed2 MHz 2 or 4 MHz (switch on main board)
Monitor/OS*NAS-BUG 1 (1 KB EPROM)NAS-SYS 1, most were shipped with NAS-SYS 3 (2 KB ROM)
RAM2 KB (1 KB used for display), exp. to 64 KB8 KB, exp. to 1 MB
Dimensions8" x 10" (main board)8" x 12" (main board)
Discontinued19791983
* A debug monitor and simple operating system (OS) was included with the devices. CP/M versions 1.4, 2.2 and 3.0 were also available later.

History

The history of Nascom starts with the history of John A. Marshall. Marshall was the "& Son" of "A Marshall & Son (London) Ltd", [2] an electronic component retailer whose adverts were a regular feature in hobby electronics magazines from as early as 1967. [3]

Marshall was a director of a company called Nasco Sales Ltd; a UK distributor of US semiconductors. He was also connected with a company called Lynx Electronics (London) Ltd. which had been a regular advertiser in the hobby electronics press since 1976. [4]

During a business trip to California in the Autumn of 1976, Marshall attended an amateur computer club meeting at Stanford University. On the flight home, he started to wonder whether there was a market in the UK for a kit computer. Marshall used the price of an SLR camera (about £200) as a reference point for the amount someone might be prepared to spend on a "hobby" purchase. [2]

At the end of 1976, Marshall attended a microprocessor seminar at Imperial College and met Phil Pitman. Pitman was the marketing manager for Mostek, which had recently become a second source for Zilog's Z80 processor. [2] Pitman put Marshall in touch with a design consultant named Chris Shelton and, in the spring of 1977, Marshall commissioned Shelton Instruments to design the Nascom 1. [1]

Most of the details of the Nascom design were described in a series of articles by Pitman that appeared in Wireless World between November 1977 and January 1979. [5]

By July 1977, monthly magazine adverts by Lynx Electronics were starting to hint about a microprocessor seminar in the autumn and a forthcoming computer product. [6]

On Saturday, 26 November 1977, Lynx Electronics launched the Nascom 1 at their "Home Microcomputer Symposium" at Wembley Conference Centre, London. [7] Tickets cost £3.50 and hosting the event on a Saturday pitched it at an amateur/hobbyist rather than a professional audience. The event included a raffle for a Nascom 1 computer kit. About 550 people attended the symposium and over 300 kits were sold in the two weeks following the launch. [8]

The symposium was covered in detail in Issue 1 of PCW magazine and the Nascom 1 was the cover photograph for that issue (though not with the final keyboard). An article in that issue [9] by K. S. Borland (another director of Nasco Sales Ltd) described the origins and history of the Nascom 1 design.

In January 1978, the Lynx Electronics advert in Practical Electronics listed the Nascom 1 in addition to their traditional list of electronic components. By February 1978 and thereafter the whole of their advert was devoted to the Nascom 1. [10]

After the success of their seminar in Wembley, Lynx electronics held a similar event in Manchester (Saturday, 1 April 1978. Tickets cost £5.50). [11]

The launch price for the Nascom 1 was £197.50 plus 8% VAT, [10] in kit form. The kit included keyboard and sockets for some (but not all) of the ICs. The purchaser needed to supply a TV, a cassette recorder and a power supply. Over its lifetime, the price was reduced to £165 + VAT (March 1979) then £125 + VAT or £140 + VAT assembled (January 1980).

By July 1978, The Micronics Company was advertising a cased, built and tested Nascom 1 (with power supply) for £399 + VAT. [12] The advert does not name the machine as a Nascom 1 but the specification is identical.

By January 1979, Lynx Electronics had appointed multiple dealers in the UK and were advertising as Nascom Microcomputers, with the "nm" logo. [13]

In September 1979, PCW reported that Grovewood Securities had invested £500,000 in Nascom. [14] The same article reported that PAL full-colour support would arrive for the Nascom by "the new year".

In September 1979, the Nascom 2 (kit) was announced with a list price of £295 + VAT. [15]

Then, Nascom were hit by a shortage of Mostek MK4118 1Kx8 RAM devices. 10 devices were required per Nascom 2 (1 each for video RAM and workspace RAM respectively, 8 for user RAM) but Nascom were only able to source 5,000 parts. [16] By November 1979 Nascom had decided to relaunch the product with a 16Kbyte DRAM board and NASBUS interconnect but to keep the price at £295 + VAT. [17] This arrangement only required 2 MK4118 devices, allowing Nascom to ship 2,500 systems. By December 1979, PCW reported that the first deliveries of the Nascom 2 were going out. [16]

On 23 May 1980, Nascom reported [18] that it had asked Grovewood Securities Ltd to appoint a receiver after it had been unable to secure further investment. Grovewood appointed Messrs Cork Gully, and Marshall resigned from the company to start a new business, Gemini Computers. [2]

Nascom continued to trade in receivership. In July 1981, PCW reported [19] that Nascom had been bought by Lucas Industries; the same issue contained a full-page advert under the name "Nascom Microcomputers. Division of Lucas Logic Ltd". [20]

In December 1981, the Nascom 3 was launched. [21] This was basically a cased Nascom 2 with some expansion boards.

In June 1984, the final issue of the Nascom Newsletter was published. [22]

In January 1985, PCW published a letter from Lucas Nascom stating that, while the Nascom 1 had been discontinued, the Nascom 2 and Nascom 3 were still in production. [23]

Unit Sales

A Nascom advert in January 1980 [24] claimed "over 15,000 systems in operation world-wide".

In a retrospective published in May 1989, [2] Marshall claimed that, by May 1980, Nascom had shipped over 35,000 Nascom 1 and Nascom 2 systems, all in kit form.

Nascom reported sales of £250,000 in April 1980 [25]

Documentation

The Nascom 1 and Nascom 2 were supplied with full documentation including circuit schematics, construction guide, datasheets for some components and assembly listing for the ROM monitor. An annotated disassembly listing of the Nascom 2 Microsoft ROM BASIC was published [26] and the code was subsequently re-purposed in retrocomputing projects such as Grant Searle's Multicomp and Spencer Owen's RC2014. The source code can now be found on GitHub. [27]

Hardware

Assembled Nascom 1 computer Nascom1.jpg
Assembled Nascom 1 computer

The Nascom 1 [28] and Nascom 2 [29] hardware designs had these features in common:

The I/O address map was common between the Nascom 1 and Nascom 2 designs, and the memory address map of the Nascom 2 was a superset of the Nascom 1 memory address map; this allowed a high degree of software compatibility between the two machines.

The Nascom 1 was implemented entirely using off-the-shelf integrated-circuits and other electronic components. The Nascom 2 used 4, 16-pin bipolar PROMs which acted as glue logic for decode functions ("N2MD" for memory decode, "N2IO" for I/O decode, "N2V" for video decode and N2DB" for data bus buffer control).

The Nascom 2 had these additional features that were not present on the Nascom 1:

The Nascom 1 used DIL sockets for making external connections. The photo shows 4 sockets, used for keyboard, serial (cassette and/or teletype/printer), PIO port A, PIO port B. The small "daughterboard" is a home-made implementation of the "snow plough" circuit referred to below.

The I/O address map was decoded as follows:

I/O Port addressFunction
0x0 (read)Read keyboard state
0x0 (write)Control keyboard, control single-step (NMI) logic, control "DRIVE" LED
0x1UART Data
0x2UART Control/Status
0x3Unused
0x4Z80-PIO Data Port A
0x5Z80-PIO Data Port B
0x6Z80-PIO Control Port A
0x7Z80-PIO Control Port B

On an unexpanded system, these 8 ports were repeated through the whole of the I/O address space. On an expanded system, the bus signal /NASIO allowed control of the I/O address space.

The memory address map was decoded as follows:

AddressNascom 1Nascom 2
0x0000-0x07FFMonitor (NASBUG, T4, NAS-SYS1, NAS-SYS3)

1 or 2 1Kbyte 2708 EPROM

Monitor (NAS-SYS1 or NAS-SYS3)

2Kbyte ROM or 2716 EPROM

0x0800-0x0BFFVideo RAMVideo RAM
0x0C00-0x0FFFWorkspace RAMWorkspace RAM
0x1000-0x1FFFDecoded on board. Usually used for RAM (4, 1Kbyte devices)
0x2000-0x2FFFDecoded on board. Usually used for RAM (4, 1Kbyte devices)
0xB000-0xBFFFDecoded on board. Usually used for EPROM (4, 1Kbyte 2708 devices)
0xC000-0xCFFFDecoded on board. Usually used for EPROM (4, 1Kbyte 2708 devices)
0xD000-0xDFFFDecoded on board. Usually used for EPROM (4, 1Kbyte 2708 devices)
0xE000-0xFFFFMicrosoft 8Kbyte ROM BASIC

Keyboard

Nascom 2 (top) and Nascom 1 (bottom) keyboards Nascom computer keyboards front.jpg
Nascom 2 (top) and Nascom 1 (bottom) keyboards
Nascom 2 (top) had angled key-tops and Nascom 1 (bottom) did not Nascom computer keyboards side.jpg
Nascom 2 (top) had angled key-tops and Nascom 1 (bottom) did not

The Nascom keyboards used Licon solid-state (induction transformer) key switches in a matrix arrangement which was scanned under software control. The keys were mounted in a metal frame that was riveted to a single-sided fibreglass PCB. The frame improves reliability by preventing the force of repeated keystrokes from being transmitted to the solder joints that connect the key switches to the PCB. A separate, conventional, key switch was provided on the keyboard for hardware reset.

The Nascom 1 had 47 keys. The Nascom 2 had 10 additional keys (GRAPH, which toggled bit 7, CTRL, a second SHIFT key, 4 cursor direction keys, LF/CH and keys for [ and ]).

The Nascom 2 keyboard was designed to be mounted at an angle; it had angled key-caps which were horizontal when the keyboard itself was mounted at an angle. The key-caps on the Nascom 1 were not angled (see photo).

The keyboard was always supplied assembled, even when the rest of the Nascom was supplied as a kit.

The Nascom 1 used a 16-pin IC-style DIL socket at each end of the connection from the keyboard to the computer main board. The Nascom 2 used a 0.1" 2x8 male header (16 pins total) at each end. In each case, the connectors use the same physical ordering of signals but the pin numbers do not correspond (because DIL sockets and IDC headers use different numbering conventions). The Nascom 2 keyboard has an additional "sense" output.

Both Nascom 1 and Nascom 2 main boards had connections to the keyboard connectors that were unused on the keyboard. On the Nascom 2, this included a connection to the /NMI (non-maskable interrupt) signal.

Video Display

Nascom character set, characters 0-127, displayed on a Nascom 2 and photographed on a monochrome non-interlaced CRT monitor Nascom vdu charset 0 127.jpg
Nascom character set, characters 0–127, displayed on a Nascom 2 and photographed on a monochrome non-interlaced CRT monitor
Character cell on Nascom 2: 8 pixels by 14 rows. Photographed on a monochrome non-interlaced CRT monitor Nascom vdu character cell.jpg
Character cell on Nascom 2: 8 pixels by 14 rows. Photographed on a monochrome non-interlaced CRT monitor

The display of the Nascom 1 and 2 was memory-mapped and consisted of 16 rows of 48 characters. Each row of characters used 64 consecutive memory locations; the extra 16 characters in each line were "hidden" by the video blanking circuitry.

Scrolling was implemented under software control. Due to an idiosyncrasy of the video memory decoding on the Nascom 1 (which was then retained on the Nascom 2), the lines were decoded discontiguously, with the top line of the display being the 16th region of memory. The top line was not scrolled, except by the Nascom CP/M implementation.

The Nascom 1 used a MCM6576P character generator to display 128 characters (bit 7 of the memory was ignored). The Nascom 2 used an identical character set but implemented it in a ROM that was footprint compatible with a 2716 2Kbyte device. The Nascom 2 allowed a second 2Kbyte character generator ROM (or EPROM) to be fitted (approximate price £20 in 1980) . The so-called NAS-GRA ROM was used to display characters with the byte codes 0x80–0xFF. The built-in Microsoft BASIC (8K ROM) interpreter could use these graphics to create a crude, blocky 96×48 graphics display.

Each character was 8 pixels wide and 16 pixels high, allowing display of true descenders. Therefore, a character occupied 16 bytes in the ROM (so that 256 characters required a total of 256*16=4Kbytes of character generator storage). Characters were abutted vertically and horizontally on the display and so the design of the characters within the character generator included vertical and horizontal inter-character spacing. On the Nascom 1, all 16 rows of the character were displayed, so that the whole image occupied 16*16=256 rows. On the Nascom 2, the top 12 or 14 rows of the character were displayed (controlled by the setting of a switch/jumper on the main board). The 12-row setting was intended for 525 line displays in 60 Hz geographies and the 14-row setting was intended for 625-line displays in 50 Hz geographies.

The design of the video display required that the CPU and the video circuitry shared access to the video RAM (the CPU had read/write access and the video circuitry had read-only access). If the CPU and the video circuitry accesses the video RAM simultaneously, the CPU was given priority and the video circuitry would read incorrect data. On the Nascom 1 this gave rise to white flicker on the screen that was termed "snow". The International Nascom Microcomputer Club (INMC) published a "snow plough" design that reduced the effect by blanking the video when simultaneous access occurred. [30] The Nascom 2 used a slightly different design but still allowed contention to occur, this time giving rise to black flicker (blanking) on the screen.

Software

Mask-programmed 2Kx8 ROMs containing the NAS-SYS 1 debug monitor Nas sys1 ROMs.jpg
Mask-programmed 2Kx8 ROMs containing the NAS-SYS 1 debug monitor

Initially, users were expected to write their own software. On the earliest machines with limited memory this meant writing Z80 assembly language on paper, assembling it by hand and then using the monitor program to enter it in hexadecimal format.

The Nascom 1 provided two 24-pin 0.6"-pitch DIL sockets for ROM memory, each wired to accept a 2708 1 KB device. The first monitor program on the Nascom 1 was named NAS-BUG and was supplied as a single 1 KB 2708 EPROM. This was superseded by NAS-BUG T2. All later versions of the monitor were 2 KB in size and so occupied both ROM sockets. The 2 KB monitors were BBUG (a 1 KB extension that co-existed with T2), T4, NAS-SYS 1 and NAS-SYS 3.

The Nascom 2 provided one 24-pin 0.6"-pitch DIL socket for ROM memory (other sockets on the Nascom 2 board could also be configured to accommodate ROMs), wired to accept a 5V 2716 2 KB device. Nascom 2 kits were initially provided with NAS-SYS 1 in masked ROM (the photo shows that at least two date-codes exist for these ROMs). NAS-SYS 1 was the only Nascom monitor ROM to be supplied as masked ROM; all other versions were supplied as EPROMs.

All of the debug monitors provided similar capabilities, with different levels of sophistication:

As the user-base grew, user-group magazines published type-in programs either in assembly language or as hexadecimal dumps or (later) in BASIC. Computing magazines such as Personal Computer World, Practical Computing and Computing Today published articles and software specifically for the Nascom computers.

Later, commercial software was made available either on cassette tape or programmed into one or more EPROMs (usually 1 KB 2708 devices).

When disk drives became available, various disk operating systems became available, including PolyDos (developed by Anders Hejlsberg and inspired by the software of the PolyMorphic Systems Poly-88), NAS-DOS and CP/M.

The predecessor of Borland's very successful Turbo Pascal compiler and integrated development environment (IDE) for CP/M and DOS was developed by Anders Hejlsberg of Blue Label Software for the Nascom 2, under the name Blue Label Software Pascal, or BLS Pascal.

In 1979 the Nascom 2 came with an onboard ROM with early Microsoft Basic 8 KB interpreter.

Expansion

Nascom defined an expansion bus, named NAS-BUS, allowing many other cards to be added to the Nascom. The Nascom 1 required a buffer board to generate the NAS-BUS; the buffer board was connected to a 43-way (42-way plus polarising slot) 0.1" pitch tinned edge connector on its PCB. The Nascom 2 generated the NAS-BUS directly on an 80-way (79-way plus polarising slot) 0.1" pitch gold-plated edge connector on its PCB.

NAS-BUS was initially proprietary but quickly superseded by the 80-bus. The standard size for these cards was 8"x8" in order to fit in a "standard" 8" rack. However, some boards were produced in other sizes. Other manufacturers (including Gemini and MAP80 Systems) produced their own 80-bus CPU boards, which allowed an entire non-Nascom system to be built. Gemini 80-bus systems were, for a while, used as an industrial process controller. British Cellophane used several to continuously monitor thickness gauges attached to plastic sheet production lines. An 80-bus compatible network card enabled both Nascom and Gemini computers to be used in office environments.

Miscellaneous

In the early 1980s, one of the first generation of computer retailers, Kenilworth Computers, released a version of the Nascom microcomputer with the selling point that it was robust enough to be used by agriculture.

Movement Computer Systems used the Nascom 2 as the controller for their MCDU1 and MCDU2 drum machines. [31] [32]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jupiter Ace</span> British home computer of the early 1980s

The Jupiter Ace by Jupiter Cantab was a British home computer released in 1982. The Ace differed from other microcomputers of the time in that its programming environment used Forth instead of the more popular BASIC. This difference, along with limited available software and poor character based graphic display, limited sales and the machine was not a success.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ZX80</span> Cheap home computer by Sinclair, 1980

The Sinclair ZX80 is a home computer launched on 29 January 1980 by Science of Cambridge Ltd.. It is notable for being one of the first computers available in the United Kingdom for less than a hundred pounds. It was available in kit form for £79.95, where purchasers had to assemble and solder it together, and as a ready-built version at £99.95.

In computer architecture, 8-bit integers or other data units are those that are 8 bits wide. Also, 8-bit central processing unit (CPU) and arithmetic logic unit (ALU) architectures are those that are based on registers or data buses of that size. Memory addresses for 8-bit CPUs are generally larger than 8-bit, usually 16-bit. 8-bit microcomputers are microcomputers that use 8-bit microprocessors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commodore 128</span> Home computer released in 1985

The Commodore 128, also known as the C128, C-128, or C= 128, is the last 8-bit home computer that was commercially released by Commodore Business Machines (CBM). Introduced in January 1985 at the CES in Las Vegas, it appeared three years after its predecessor, the Commodore 64, the bestselling computer of the 1980s. Approximately 2.5 million C128s were sold during its four year production run.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">KIM-1</span> Single-board computer produced by MOS Technology

The KIM-1, short for Keyboard Input Monitor, is a small 6502-based single-board computer developed and produced by MOS Technology, Inc. and launched in 1976. It was very successful in that period, due to its low price and easy-access expandability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ferguson Big Board</span> Z80-based single-board computer

The Big Board (1980) and Big Board II (1982) were Z80 based single-board computers designed by Jim Ferguson. They provided a complete CP/M compatible computer system on a single printed circuit board, including CPU, memory, disk drive interface, keyboard and video monitor interface. The printed circuit board was sized to match the Shugart 801 or 851 floppy drive. This allowed attachment to up to two 8 inch or 5 1/4 inch floppy disk drives. The Big Board II added a SASI interface for hard disk drives, enhancements to system speed and enhancements to the terminal interface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SWTPC</span> Defunct US electronic kit and computer producer

Southwest Technical Products Corporation, or SWTPC, was an American producer of electronic kits, and later complete computer systems. It was incorporated in 1967 in San Antonio, Texas, succeeding the Daniel E. Meyer Company. In 1990, SWTPC became Point Systems, before ceasing a few years later.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Micro-Professor MPF-I</span> Microcomputer released by Multitech in 1981

The Micro-Professor MPF-I is a microcomputer released by Multitech in 1981. The company's first branded product, it was marketed as a training system to learn machine code and assembly language for the Zilog Z80 microprocessor. After releasing several iterations of the product, Acer sold the product line to Flite Electronics in 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MicroBee</span> Series of networkable home computers

MicroBee was a series of networkable home computers by Applied Technology, which became publicly listed company MicroBee Systems Limited soon after its release. The original Microbee computer was designed in Australia by a team including Owen Hill and Matthew Starr.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compukit UK101</span> Clone of the Ohio Scientific Superboard II single-board computer

The Compukit UK101 microcomputer (1979) is a kit clone of the Ohio Scientific Superboard II single-board computer, with a few enhancements for the UK market - notably replacing the 24×24 screen display with a more useful 48×16 layout working at UK video frequencies. The video output is black and white with 256 semigraphic characters generated by a two kilobyte ROM. It has no bit-mapped graphics capability. The video is output through a UHF modulator, designed to connect to a TV set.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acorn System 1</span> Early 8-bit microcomputer

The Acorn System 1, initially called the Acorn Microcomputer (Micro-Computer), was an early 8-bit microcomputer for hobbyists, based on the MOS 6502 CPU, and produced by British company Acorn Computers from 1979.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tangerine Microtan 65</span>

The Tangerine Microtan 65 was a 6502-based single board microcomputer, first sold in 1979, that could be expanded into, what was for its day, a comprehensive and powerful system. The design became the basis for what later became the Oric Atmos and later computers. Those later machines have similar keyboard addressing and tape I/O as the Microtan 65. The Microtan 65 has a hardware single step function that can be used for debugging software in both ROM and RAM. The computer was available as ready-built boards or as kits consisting of board and components requiring soldering together.

In the BBC Microcomputer System, the Tube is the expansion interface and architecture which allows the BBC Micro to communicate with a second processor, or coprocessor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dick Smith Super-80 Computer</span>

The Dick Smith Super-80 was a Zilog Z80 based kit computer developed as a joint venture between Electronics Australia magazine and Dick Smith Electronics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BBC Micro</span> Series of British microcomputers by Acorn

The British Broadcasting Corporation Microcomputer System, or BBC Micro, is a series of microcomputer designed and built by Acorn Computers Limited in the 1980s for the Computer Literacy Project of the BBC. Designed with an emphasis on education, it was notable for its ruggedness, expandability, and the quality of its operating system. The machine was the focus of a number of educational BBC TV programmes on computer literacy, starting with The Computer Programme in 1982, followed by Making the Most of the Micro, Computers in Control in 1983, and finally Micro Live in 1985.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heathkit H8</span> 1970s microcomputer

Heathkit's H8 is an Intel 8080A-based microcomputer sold in kit form starting in 1977. The H8 is similar to the S-100 bus computers of the era, and like those machines is often used with the CP/M operating system on floppy disk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robotron Z1013</span> Single-board home computer made in East Germany from 1985 until 1990.

The MRB Z 1013 was an East German single-board computer produced by VEB Robotron Riesa, which was primarily intended for private use and educational institutions. It was powered by a U880 processor and sold together with a membrane keyboard. Initially, the kit was equipped with 16 kilobytes of DRAM, which was later replaced by a 64 KB version.

Each time Intel launched a new microprocessor, they simultaneously provided a system development kit (SDK) allowing engineers, university students, and others to familiarise themselves with the new processor's concepts and features. The SDK single-board computers allowed the user to enter object code from a keyboard or upload it through a communication port, and then test run the code. The SDK boards provided a system monitor ROM to operate the keyboard and other interfaces. Kits varied in their specific features but generally offered optional memory and interface configurations, a serial terminal link, audio cassette storage, and EPROM program memory. Intel's Intellec development system could download code to the SDK boards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gigatron TTL</span>

The Gigatron TTL is a retro-style 8-bit computer, where the CPU is implemented by a set of TTL chips instead of a single microprocessor, imitating the hardware present in early arcades. Its target is the computing enthusiasts, for studying or hobby purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transam Triton</span> Computer History

The Transam Triton was an early British 8-bit microcomputer announced in 1978 as a partnership between Transam Components and Electronics Today International (ETI) magazine. It appeared in the context of accelerating interest in home computing through the 1970s. The emerging wide availability of single chip microprocessors enabled computing to become affordable to individuals, rather than the preserve of businesses and universities. Several similar home computers arrived around this time such as the Nascom and Newbear 77-68 just prior to the launch of the more well known low cost machines such as the Sinclair ZX80 and ZX81 that helped establish the mainstream market.

References

  1. 1 2 UK micro pioneer Chris Shelton: The mind behind the Nascom 1
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Marshall, John (May 1989). "From The Horse's Mouth" (PDF). Scorpio News: 25. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-05-24. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  3. A Marshall & Son (November 1967). "Advert" (PDF). Practical Electronics: 858. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-31. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  4. Lynx Electronics (London) Ltd (August 1976). "Advert" (PDF). Practical Electronics: 668. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-24. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  5. "Wireless World". The Nascom Homepage. November 1977.
  6. Lynx Electronics (London) Ltd (July 1977). "Watch This Space" (PDF). Practical Electronics. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-31. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  7. Lynx Electronics (London) Ltd (November 1977). "The Home Computer Forum" (PDF). Practical Electronics: 212. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-24.
  8. "News Briefs" (PDF). Practical Electronics: 417. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  9. Borland, Kerr. "Yours To Command" (PDF). Personal Computer World (1): 20. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  10. 1 2 Lynx Electronics (London) Ltd (February 1978). "Advert" (PDF). Practical Electronics: 416. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  11. Lynx Electronics (London) Ltd (April 1978). "Advert: Manchester seminar" (PDF). Practical Electronics: 614. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-31. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  12. The Micronics Company (July 1978). "Advert" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 45. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  13. Nascom Microcomputers (January 1979). "Advert" (PDF). Electronics Today International: 46. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  14. Kewney, Guy (September 1979). "Newsprint" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 30. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  15. Turpin, Alan; Shortland, David (September 1979). "Market Place" (PDF). Practical Electronics: 27. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-08-31. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  16. 1 2 Kewney, Guy (December 1979). "Newsprint" (PDF). Personal Computer Work. p. 32. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  17. Nascom Microcomputers (November 1979). "Advert" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 21. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-08.
  18. "Nascom in danger -- or is it?" (PDF). Wireless World: 54. August 1980. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  19. Kewney, Guy (July 1981). "Newsprint: Lucas buys Nascom" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 50. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  20. Nascom Computers (July 1981). "Advert" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 52. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  21. Nascom Microcomputers (December 1981). "Advert" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 100. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-03-08. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  22. Clemmett, Ian J. (June 1984). "Editorial" (PDF). Nascom Newsletter. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-05-24.
  23. Seddon, Peter (January 1985). "The Nascom Lives!" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 131. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-05-22. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  24. "Advert" (PDF). Personal Computer World: 17. January 1980. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-07-08. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  25. "News Of The Month" (PDF). Wireless World: 54. August 1980.
  26. Lloyd-Parker, Carl (1983). "The workings of Nascom ROM BASIC v4.7" (PDF). 80-Bus News. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-04-19. Retrieved 28 May 2018.
  27. "Nascom ROM BASIC". Github. 8 August 2022.
  28. "Nascom 1 Schematics" (PDF). The Nascom Home Page. April 1978. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2002-06-22.
  29. "Nascom 2 schematics" (PDF). The Nascom Home Page. 16 June 1979. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2003-08-01.
  30. Hunt, Dave (1979). "INMC News issue 2" (PDF). Nascom Magazines. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-06.
  31. "Movement MCDU1 In The Garden" . Retrieved 23 May 2022.
  32. Waveterm MCDU1 Album (5 May 2010). "Showing the Nascom 2 computer inside MCDU1". Flikr. Retrieved 23 May 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)