Philip Morris v. Uruguay

Last updated

Philip Morris v. Uruguay
World Bank building at Washington.jpg
Office ICSID in 2006
Court ICSID
Full case nameARB/10/7. Philip Morris Brand Sàrl (Switzerland), Philip Morris Products S.A. (Switzerland) v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay
Decided8 July 2016 (6 years old)
Transcript(s) Sentence links
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Gary Born, James Crawford, Piero Bernardini
Keywords
Cigarettes, intellectual property, health

The Philip Morris v. Uruguay case (Spanish : Caso Philip Morris contra Uruguay) was an investor-state dispute settlement case initiated on 19 February 2010 and concluded on 8 July 2016, in which the multinational tobacco company Philip Morris International (PMI), whose head office is located in Lausanne, [1] lodged a complaint against Uruguay that was resolved by international arbitration under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). [2]

Contents

The reference to the process is Case ICSID N° ARB/10/7,and the case name is: FTR Holdings S.A. (Switzerland) and others against Oriental Republic of Uruguay.

PMI's complaint alleged that Uruguay's anti-smoking legislation devalued its cigarette trademarks and investments in the country and sought compensation of twenty-five million dollars for engaging in anticompetitive practices in violation of the bilateral investment treaty between Switzerland, where Philip Morris International is headquartered, and Uruguay. [3] [4]

The treaty provides that disputes may be settled by binding arbitration under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). [5]

Uruguay had received accolades from the World Health Organization and from anti-smoking activists for its anti-smoking campaign. [6]

On 8 July 2016, after 6 years, the ICSID ruled in favor of Uruguay, forcing PMI to pay the expenses of the defendants and the court. [7] [8] [9]

Context

On 19 June 2003, when the Uruguayan President was Jorge Batlle, the General Assembly of Uruguay approved the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, an international treaty that requires signatories to enact various anti-smoking policies recommended by the World Health Organization.

In 2006, Uruguay under President Tabaré Vázquez, an oncologist by profession, began to enact comprehensive anti-smoking legislation. On 1 March 2006, Uruguay became the first country in Latin America to prohibit smoking in enclosed public spaces. [10] In March 2008 the legislature approved Law 18.256 [11] which includes six strategies of anti-smoking policy.

Some of the measures by the government were the ban on selling different types of presentations of the same brand of cigarettes, the dissemination of images warning about the risks of smoking and covering at least 80% of the cigarette pack, raising of taxes, banning cigarette advertising in the media, and banning sponsorship of sports events. In addition, smoking was banned in public places such as offices, student centers, bars, restaurants, dances and public places, among others.

The smokefree campaign "Libre de Humo de Tabaco" was gradually implemented by the "Ministerio de Salud Pública del Uruguay" (Ministry of Public Health of Uruguay). [12]

Complaint

Philip Morris International is a multinational company, a leading producer of cigarettes, of which it owns seven out of twenty global brands.

The tobacco company initiated a claim in the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), a part of the World Bank seeking $25 million in compensation from Uruguay. [13] In that forum, an arbitration tribunal was formed with one arbitrator appointed by each party and a third arbitrator elected by the arbitrators appointed by the parties. The plaintiffs are FTR Holding SA (Switzerland), Philip Morris Products SA (Switzerland) and Abal Hermanos SA (PMI representative in Uruguay) against Uruguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7). [14]

"We have no choice but to litigate" said Rees. The company said it has sought to dialogue with the government without success. [3]

— Morgan Rees, Director Communications Regulatory Philip Morris International, in 2010.

"Philip Morris (which sued Uruguay for its anti smoking measures) wants to make an example to Uruguay and intimidate other countries." [15]

—  Tabaré Vázquez, November 2010.

Philip Morris has filed similar cases against Norway and Australia.

Decision

On 2 July 2013, the tribunal decided it had jurisdiction. [16]

The resolution of the case, which affected international  jurisprudence, took 6 years; the case ended on 8 July 2016. The arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of Uruguay, forcing the demandant to pay the costs of the defendants and the court. The final report established that Philip Morris had to pay 7 million dollars to the country for judicial expenses, in addition to paying different amounts for the fees and administrative expenses of the three arbitrators and the CADI. [17] Gary Born emitted a discordant decision in two of the points of the judicial failure.

After its victory in the case, the government declared that from 2017 cigarettes in Uruguay will be sold in generic packaging. [18] [19] [20]

Reactions

Carissa Etienne in 2015 Carissa Etienne 2015.jpg
Carissa Etienne in 2015

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) supported Uruguay. [21] Uruguay's anti-smoking efforts also received support from past New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, [22] and from Bernard Borel, Swiss deputy from the Canton of Vaud. [23]

PAHO made a statement praising the decision:

"This decision is an acknowledgment of Uruguay's continued efforts to protect its population from tobacco use and tobacco smoke from others." [24]

—  Carissa Etienne, Director of the Pan American Health Organization, August 2016.

Effects

According to Enrico Bonadio, Senior Lecturer in Law at City University London, the ruling in the case "may make it more difficult for tobacco companies to use lawsuits to produce a “chilling effect” and so discourage countries from introducing tobacco control policies." [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament (cigarette)</span> American brand of cigarettes

Parliament is an American brand of cigarettes, currently owned and manufactured by Philip Morris USA in the United States and Philip Morris International outside of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rothmans, Benson & Hedges</span> Canadian manufacturer and distributor of tobacco products

Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. (RBH) is a Canadian manufacturer and distributor of tobacco products. It was formed by the merger of the Canadian units of Rothmans International and the Benson & Hedges brand – owned by Philip Morris.

The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is an international arbitration institution established in 1966 for legal dispute resolution and conciliation between international investors and States. ICSID is part of and funded by the World Bank Group, headquartered in Washington, D.C., in the United States. It is an autonomous, multilateral specialized institution to encourage international flow of investment and mitigate non-commercial risks by a treaty drafted by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development's executive directors and signed by member countries. As of May 2016, 153 contracting member states agreed to enforce and uphold arbitral awards in accordance with the ICSID Convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&M</span> American cigarette brand

L&M is an American brand of cigarettes, currently owned and manufactured by Altria and Philip Morris International. The name comes from the tobacco company founded in 1873 called Liggett & Myers, predecessor of today's Liggett Group, in which L&M was originally produced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Basic (cigarette)</span> American cigarette brand

Basic is a U.S. brand of cigarettes, currently owned by Philip Morris International. Cigarettes are manufactured by Philip Morris USA in the U.S. and by PMI in the rest of the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip Morris International</span> Multinational tobacco company

Philip Morris International Inc. (PMI) is an American multinational tobacco company, with products sold in over 180 countries. The most recognized and best selling product of the company is Marlboro. Philip Morris International is often referred to as one of the companies comprising Big Tobacco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Next (cigarette)</span> Brand of cigarettes

Next is a brand of cigarettes, currently owned and manufactured by Philip Morris International. The original acronym for Next was a reference to "nicotine extracted".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smoking in Uruguay</span>

Smoking in Uruguay in enclosed public spaces became illegal on 1 March 2006. On that date, bars, restaurants or offices where people are caught smoking began facing fines of more than $1,100 or a three-day closure. Uruguay was the first country in Latin America to ban smoking in enclosed public spaces.

PMFTC, Inc. is the Philippine affiliate of Philip Morris International (PMI). Owned 50-50 by PMI and local conglomerate LT Group, PMFTC is the leading cigarette manufacturer in the Philippines, controlling over 90% of the local market, commercialising the brands Hope Luxury, Marlboro, and More, among others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tobacco politics</span> Politics surrounding the use and distribution of tobacco

Tobacco politics refers to the politics surrounding the use and distribution of tobacco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tobacco control</span> Field of health science

Tobacco control is a field of international public health science, policy and practice dedicated to addressing tobacco use and thereby reducing the morbidity and mortality it causes. Since most cigarettes and cigars and hookahs contain/use tobacco, tobacco control also concerns these. E-cigarettes do not contain tobacco itself, but (often) do contain nicotine. Tobacco control is a priority area for the World Health Organization (WHO), through the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. References to a tobacco control movement may have either positive or negative connotations, depending upon the commentator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act</span>

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, is a federal statute in the United States that was signed into law by President Barack Obama on June 22, 2009. The Act gives the Food and Drug Administration the power to regulate the tobacco industry. A signature element of the law imposes new warnings and labels on tobacco packaging and their advertisements, with the goal of discouraging minors and young adults from smoking. The Act also bans flavored cigarettes, places limits on the advertising of tobacco products to minors and requires tobacco companies to seek FDA approval for new tobacco products.

Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) or investment court system (ICS) is a system through which countries can be sued by foreign investors for certain state actions affecting foreign direct investment (FDI). This system most often takes the form of international arbitration between a foreign investor and the nation receiving the FDI.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plain tobacco packaging</span> Legally mandated packaging of tobacco products without any brand imagery

Plain tobacco packaging, also known as generic, neutral, standardised or homogeneous packaging, is packaging of tobacco products, typically cigarettes, without any branding, including only the brand name in a mandated size, font and place on the pack, in addition to the health warnings and any other legally mandated information such as toxic constituents and tax-paid stamps. The appearance of all tobacco packs is standardised, including the colour of the pack.

"Tobacco" is a segment of the HBO news satire television series Last Week Tonight with John Oliver about the tobacco industry. It first aired on February 15, 2015, as part of the second episode of the series' second season. During the eighteen-minute segment, comedian John Oliver discusses tobacco industry trends and practices.

Codentify is the name of a product serialization system developed and patented back in 2005 by Philip Morris International (PMI) for tobacco product authenticity, production volume verification and supply chain control. In the production process, each cigarette package is marked with a unique visible code, that allows authenticating the code against a central server.

A heated tobacco product (HTP) is a tobacco product that heats the tobacco at a lower temperature than conventional cigarettes. These products contain nicotine, which is a highly addictive chemical. The heat generates an aerosol or smoke to be inhaled from the tobacco, which contains nicotine and other chemicals. HTPs may also contain additives not found in tobacco, including flavoring chemicals. HTPs generally heat tobacco to temperatures under 600 °C (1100 °F), a lower temperature than conventional cigarettes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Belmont (cigarette)</span> Canadian cigarette brand

Belmont is a Canadian brand of cigarettes, currently owned and manufactured by Philip Morris International (PMI) in most parts of the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iqos</span> Heated tobacco products by Philip Morris International

Iqos is a line of heated tobacco and electronic cigarette products manufactured by Philip Morris International (PMI). It was first introduced in November 2014 in Japan and Italy. Most of the IQOS products are devices that heat tobacco without burning it.

The Foundation for a Smoke-Free World is an organization focused on smoking harm reduction founded in 2017. It is funded by Philip Morris International (PMI), which had initial plans for $80 million in annual funding. The current pledge agreement from PMI to the Foundation, modified in September 2020, promises $35 million in funding to the Foundation from 2022 through 2029.

References

  1. ↑ PMI. "Philip Morris Internacional Management SA Suiza, Centro de Operaciones" . Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  2. ↑ El Espectador (9 March 2010). "Philip Morris versus Uruguay" (in Spanish). Uruguay. Archived from the original on 14 March 2010. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  3. 1 2 BBC (12 March 2010). "Tabacalera Philip Morris demanda a Uruguay" (in Spanish). Reino Unido. Archived from the original on 23 December 2022. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  4. ↑ PMI. "Philip Morris International Management SA - Switzerland Operations Centre" . Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  5. ↑ ABC News (8 July 2016). "Uruguay Wins Dispute With Tobacco Giant Philip Morris". Archived from the original on 9 July 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2016.
  6. ↑ El Observador (6 September 2011). "Cigarrillos mentolados aumentan la adicción" (in Spanish). Uruguay. Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
  7. ↑ El País. "Philip Morris deberá pagar a Uruguay US$ 7 millones por gastos judiciales" (in Spanish). Uruguay.
  8. ↑ BCC (8 July 2016). "Histórico fallo a favor de Uruguay en el juicio contra la tabacalera Philip Morris". BBC News Mundo (in Spanish).
  9. ↑ elfinanciero. "Esta es la historia de Uruguay (David) contra Philip Morris (Goliath)" (in Spanish). México.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  10. ↑ LR21 (9 July 2011). "Uruguay cree que Philip Morris incumplió pasos previos a la demanda" (in Spanish). Uruguay. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  11. ↑ Uruguay Legislature (6 March 2008). "Ley Nº 18.256 Control del Tabaquismo" (in Spanish). Uruguay. Archived from the original on 16 April 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2009.
  12. ↑ MSP. "Campaña "Libre de Humo de Tabaco"" (in Spanish). Uruguay. Archived from the original on 15 June 2010. Retrieved 15 November 2010.
  13. ↑ Alfred-Maurice de Zayas (16 November 2015). "How can Philip Morris sue Uruguay over its tobacco laws?". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
  14. ↑ ICSID (26 March 2010). "ICSID - Case Details" . Retrieved 17 November 2010.
  15. ↑ AFP (15 November 2010). "Philip Morris quiere dar un "escarmiento" a Uruguay, acusa ex presidente" (in Spanish). Retrieved 10 March 2009.
  16. ↑ "Decision on Jurisdiction" (PDF). 4 July 2013. Retrieved 22 August 2014.
  17. ↑ El País (8 July 2016). "Philip Morris deberá pagar a Uruguay US$ 7 millones por gastos judiciales" (in Spanish). Uruguay.
  18. ↑ El Observador. "A partir de 2017 los cigarrillos se venderán en empaquetado genérico" (in Spanish). Uruguay.
  19. ↑ Canal 12. "Vázquez anunció en cadena nacional que Uruguay ganó juicio a Philips Morris" (in Spanish). Uruguay.
  20. ↑ LR21 (29 August 2016). "Drogas" (in Spanish). Uruguay.
  21. ↑ "PAHO WHO PAHO supports Uruguay in litigation filed by industry against tobacco control measures". PAHO supports Uruguay in litigation filed by industry against tobacco control measures. Pan American Health Organization. 22 July 2016. Retrieved 1 September 2016.
  22. ↑ El Espectador (15 November 2010). "Alcalde de Nueva York apoyó a Mujica en caso Philip Morris" (in Spanish). Uruguay. Archived from the original on 17 April 2011. Retrieved 16 November 2010.
  23. ↑ La República (19 March 2010). "Suiza apoya a Uruguay" (in Spanish). Uruguay. Retrieved 21 April 2011.
  24. ↑ OPS (9 July 2016). "OMS y OPS felicitan a Uruguay por su victoria ante Philip Morris" (in Spanish).
  25. ↑ theconversation. "Uruguay's victory against Big Tobacco is more than just a local triumph" . Retrieved 31 July 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.