Platform Work Directive

Last updated

The Platform Work Directive is a proposed European Union Directive on the regulation of platform work in EU law.

Contents

Contents

Article 1 sets out the Directive's purpose to improve work, ensure "correct determination of [platform workers'] employment status" and promote fairness, transparency and accountability in algorithmic management in platform work, and support sustainable growth in digital labour platforms. Under (2) the Directive applies to everyone with an employment contract or relationship, and article 10 also applies to those who do not, and (3) it applies wherever the platform is established.

Article 2 sets out definitions of (1) 'digital labour platform' as a commercial service at a distance by electronic means at the request of a recipient, with an essential component of organising work, but does not include share asset platforms (2) platform work means work organised by contract (3) person performing platform work is irrespective of the contract (4) platform worker is someone with an employment contract or relationship, (5) representatives are worker representatives and (6) micro, or small or medium size enterprises follows the Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, [1] namely employing under 250 persons, turnover under €50 million, or balance sheet totalling under €43 million.

Article 3 requires member states to have procedures to correctly determine employment status of someone on a platform, "guided primarily by facts relating to the actual performance of work, taking into account the use of algorithms in the organisation of platform work, irrespective of how the relationship is classified in any contractual arrangement that may have been agreed between the parties involved."

Article 4(1) sets a legal presumption that a contractual relationship between a platform controlling performance of work and a person performing work is an employment relationship. Then (2) control of work is defined as fulfilling at least two of:

Member states should implement the presumption taking account of impact on startups, avoid capturing the genuine self-employed and supporting the sustainable growth of digital labour platforms with (a) clear information on the legal presumption (b) guidance for platforms (c) guidance for enforcement, and (d) inspections. Under (4) the legal presumption would begin when the Directive enters into force, not retrospectively.

Article 5 enables the presumption to be rebutted, but it has the burden of proof and this does not suspend the legal presumption, and has a duty to assist the court with relevant information.

Chapter III Algorithmic management

Article 6 requires (1) platforms to inform workers of (a) automated monitoring systems and (b) automated decision-making systems that significantly affect work conditions. (2) Information must be detailed (3) in a document (4) available for worker representatives and government authorities. Also (5) platforms must not process data not strictly necessary for performance of the contract, such as personal, emotional or psychological data, health data, private conversations including with worker representatives, or collect data while the platform worker is not working.

Article 7 requires human monitoring of automated systems, including the impact on health and safety.

Article 8 requires human review of significant decisions, including a right to an explanation of any decision from an automated system, and reasons for restricting access to an account. There is a right to review decisions.

Article 9 requires information and consultation in accordance with the Information and Consultation of Employees Directive 2002, and platforms with over 500 workers must pay for an expert to assist workers.

Article 10 requires that articles 6, 7(1) and (3) and 8 also apply to non-employees of platforms.

Chapter IV Transparency

Article 11 requires platforms to make declarations that they are platforms to relevant authorities.

Article 12 requires platforms inform authorities of the number of people on platforms and conditions of work, including contracts, each 6 months.

Chapter V Enforcement

Article 13 requires everyone on a platform has adequate redress and dispute resolution for violation of rights.

Article 14 requires procedures to support people doing platform work, including those with "a legitimate interest in defending the rights of persons performing platform work", such as trade unions.

Article 15 requires that member states ensure people doing platform work can contact and communicate with each other, while complying with the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679, and the platform must refrain from accessing or monitoring these contacts or communications.

Article 16 requires people doing platform work can make a platform release evidence under their control, if needed by court order.

Articles 17 to 18 protect people from any adverse treatment or dismissal for exercising rights under the Directive, that they can request reasons for dismissal, and the burden of proof lies on the platform.

Article 19 requires supervision and penalties for breach.

Articles 20 to 24 are final provisions on the Directive setting minimum standards, being implemented, and reviewed.

See also

Notes

Related Research Articles

Labour laws are those that mediate the relationship between workers, employing entities, trade unions, and the government. Collective labour law relates to the tripartite relationship between employee, employer, and union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union law</span> Laws of the European Union for social and economic progress

European Union law is a system of rules operating within the member states of the European Union (EU). Since the founding of the European Coal and Steel Community following World War II, the EU has developed the aim to "promote peace, its values and the well-being of its peoples". The EU has political institutions, social and economic policies, which transcend nation states for the purpose of cooperation and human development. According to its Court of Justice the EU represents "a new legal order of international law".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overtime</span> Time someone works beyond normal working hours

Overtime is the amount of time someone works beyond normal working hours. The term is also used for the pay received for this time. Normal hours may be determined in several ways:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom labour law</span> Labour rights in the UK

United Kingdom labour law regulates the relations between workers, employers and trade unions. People at work in the UK can rely upon a minimum set of employment rights, which are found in Acts of Parliament, Regulations, common law and equity. This includes the right to a minimum wage of £9.50 for over-23-year-olds from April 2022 under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Working Time Regulations 1998 give the right to 28 days paid holidays, breaks from work, and attempt to limit long working hours. The Employment Rights Act 1996 gives the right to leave for child care, and the right to request flexible working patterns. The Pensions Act 2008 gives the right to be automatically enrolled in a basic occupational pension, whose funds must be protected according to the Pensions Act 1995.

An employment contract or contract of employment is a kind of contract used in labour law to attribute rights and responsibilities between parties to a bargain. The contract is between an "employee" and an "employer". It has arisen out of the old master-servant law, used before the 20th century. Employment contracts relies on the concept of authority, in which the employee agrees to accept the authority of the employer and in exchange, the employer agrees to pay the employee a stated wage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Employment Relations Act 2000</span> Statute of the Parliament of New Zealand

The New Zealand Employment Relations Act 2000 is a statute of the Parliament of New Zealand. It was substantially amended by the Employment Relations Amendment Act 2001 and by the ERAA 2004.

United Kingdom agency worker law refers to the law which regulates people's work through employment agencies in the United Kingdom. Though statistics are disputed, there are currently between half a million and one and a half million agency workers in the UK, and probably over 17,000 agencies. As a result of judge made law and absence of statutory protection, agency workers have more flexible pay and working conditions than permanent staff covered under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Workplace privacy is related with various ways of accessing, controlling, and monitoring employees' information in a working environment. Employees typically must relinquish some of their privacy while in the workplace, but how much they must do can be a contentious issue. The debate rages on as to whether it is moral, ethical and legal for employers to monitor the actions of their employees. Employers believe that monitoring is necessary both to discourage illicit activity and to limit liability. With this problem of monitoring employees, many are experiencing a negative effect on emotional and physical stress including fatigue, lowered employee morale and lack of motivation within the workplace. Employers might choose to monitor employee activities using surveillance cameras, or may wish to record employees activities while using company-owned computers or telephones. Courts are finding that disputes between workplace privacy and freedom are being complicated with the advancement of technology as traditional rules that govern areas of privacy law are debatable and becoming less important.

The Posted Workers Directive96/71/EC is an EU directive concerned with the free movement of workers within the European Union. It makes an exception to the Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 1980, which ordinarily requires that workers are protected by the law of the member state in which they work.

European labour law regulates basic transnational standards of employment and partnership at work in the European Union and countries adhering to the European Convention on Human Rights. In setting regulatory floors to competition for job-creating investment within the Union, and in promoting a degree of employee consultation in the workplace, European labour law is viewed as a pillar of the "European social model". Despite wide variation in employment protection and related welfare provision between member states, a contrast is typically drawn with conditions in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rome I Regulation</span>

The Rome I Regulation is a regulation which governs the choice of law in the European Union. It is based upon and replaces the Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 1980. The Rome I Regulation can be distinguished from the Brussels Regime which determines which court can hear a given dispute, as opposed to which law it should apply. The regulation applies to all EU member states except Denmark, which has an opt-out from implementing regulations under the area of freedom, security and justice. The Danish government planned to join the regulation if a referendum on 3 December 2015 approved converting its opt-out into an opt-in, but the proposal was rejected. While the United Kingdom originally opted-out of the regulation, it subsequently decided to opt in.

Robinson-Steele v RD Retail Services Ltd (2006) C-131/04 is a European labour law and UK labour law case concerning the Working Time Directive, which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998.

The German Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG) is a federal data protection act, that together with the data protection acts of the German federated states and other area-specific regulations, governs the exposure of personal data, which are manually processed or stored in IT systems.

South African labour law regulates the relationship between employers, employees and trade unions in the Republic of South Africa.

Vatsouras and Koupatantze v ARGE is a case decided by the European Court of Justice which deals with the concepts of 'worker' and 'social assistance' under European Union law.

The Free Movement of Workers Regulation No. 492/2011 is a European Union law, which specifies the right of workers of any European Union Member State to move to and access employment in another Member State without unjustified discrimination.

Akavan Erityisalojen Keskusliitto AEK ry v Fujitsu Siemens Computers Oy (2009) C-44/08 is a European labour law case, concerning the information and consultation in the European Union.

In the regulation of algorithms, particularly artificial intelligence and its subfield of machine learning, a right to explanation is a right to be given an explanation for an output of the algorithm. Such rights primarily refer to individual rights to be given an explanation for decisions that significantly affect an individual, particularly legally or financially. For example, a person who applies for a loan and is denied may ask for an explanation, which could be "Credit bureau X reports that you declared bankruptcy last year; this is the main factor in considering you too likely to default, and thus we will not give you the loan you applied for."

<i>Uber BV v Aslam</i> British labour law case

Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5 is a landmark case in UK labour law and company law on employment rights. The UK Supreme Court held the transport corporation, Uber, must pay its drivers the national living wage, and at least 28 days paid holidays, from the time that drivers log onto the Uber app, and are willing and able to work. The Supreme Court decision was unanimous, and upheld the Court of Appeal, Employment Appeal Tribunal, and Employment Tribunal. The Supreme Court, and all courts below, left open whether the drivers are also employees but indicated that the criteria for employment status was fulfilled, given Uber's control over drivers.

Labour hire is a form of employment in which an employer directs their de jure employees to perform work at an external workplace, belonging to a client of the legal employer.