Pride at Work

Last updated
PAW
Pride at Work
Founded1994
Headquarters Washington, D.C.
Location
Key people
Brittany Anderson (IAMAW) and Brittani Murray (USW), co-presidents
Affiliations AFL-CIO
Website www.prideatwork.org

Pride at Work (P@W) is an American lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender group (LGBTQ+) of labor union activists affiliated with the AFL-CIO.

Contents

Gay Rights and the Labor Movement

The openness, visibility and participation of LGBT people in the American labor movement is closely linked to that of the American Gay Rights Movement. But gay activism flourished in a limited way in some sectors of the "house of labor." The National Union of Marine Cooks and Stewards (NUMCS), which represented workers on luxury liners, [1] included among its leaders the openly gay Stephen R. Blair. NUMCS was derided as "red, black and queer" for its leftist politics, racial integration and the large number of gay members. [2] A sign in the union hall proclaimed, "Race-baiting, Red-baiting, and Queer-Baiting is Anti-Union." [3] Blair's life-partner, Frank McCormick, was a vice president of the California Congress of Industrial Organizations and an important leader in the 1934 West Coast longshore strike. [1] [4] [5] Harry Hay was an organizer for the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union in New York City. [1] [4] Attending the Southern California Labor School, he met many of the men who would later become some of the first members of the Mattachine Society, [6] whose initial five members were all union activists. [1]

Bayard Rustin, an openly gay man and a principal organizer of the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, [7] [8] [9] later became the first executive secretary of the A. Philip Randolph Institute. [7] [10] Another openly gay man, Tom Kahn wrote speeches for and served as assistant to AFL-CIO presidents George Meany and Lane Kirkland, as well as head of the AFL-CIO's International Affairs Department from 1986 until his death in 1992. [7] [11] Openly gay Bill Olwell became an international vice president of the Retail Clerks International Union (RCIU) in 1972, and was later elected to a similar position with the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) in 1986 after the RCIU merged with the Amalgamated Meat Cutters to form the UFCW. [7] [12]

The first public endorsement of LGBT rights by an American labor union, however, did not occur until 1970, after the Stonewall Rebellion. [7] In that year, the executive council of the American Federation of Teachers passed a resolution which denounced discrimination against teachers solely because the individual was a homosexual. [13] [14] A second step forward for LGBT labor activists came with the Coors strike and boycott. As part of its anti-union efforts, the company administered lie-detector tests to prospective employees asking about their union views. [13] [15] Among the questions also asked was whether the job applicant was a homosexual. [13] [16] In 1974, the Teamsters were attempting to organize workers at Coors. Two straight Teamster organizers approached San Francisco gay community leaders Howard Wallace, a teamster union activist, and Harvey Milk, then an emerging political activist, about supporting the boycott. [17] Wallace and Milk agreed, if the Teamsters would agree to promote the hiring of openly gay truck drivers. [17] [18] The Teamsters consented. [17] [18] [19] The Coors boycott took off in San Francisco, and spread nationally. In California, the market share of Coors dropped from 40 percent to 14 percent. Facing this boycott, Coors stopped asking its applicants about their sexuality. [18]

The gay rights and labor movements joined forced again in 1978. Proposition Six, known as the Briggs amendment, would have banned gays from teaching in California public schools. A coalition of gay and union activists was formed and defeated the amendment. [18] [20]

In 1979, the quadrennial convention of the AFL-CIO unanimously adopted a resolution calling for the enactment of federal legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation. [21] [22]

Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, a number of LGBT union members had formed caucuses within their respective unions. Organizations with large numbers of members which became politically active, even electorally important, included those within the Service Employees International Union, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the Communications Workers of America and UFCW. [23]

Origins

In June 1994, LGBT union activists gathered in New York City as part of the 25th anniversary of the Stonewall riots. Wallace and others associated with the Gay and Lesbian Labor Activists Network (GALLAN), an organization of LGBT labor union activists in San Francisco, pushed for the formation of national organization out of frustration with the labor movement's silence during the debate over the Defense of Marriage Act. [24] Taking a cue from a 1990 booklet titled Pride at Work: Organizing for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Unions, the group decided to adopt the title as its name. [25]

In 1997, PAW affiliated as a constituency group of the AFL-CIO. Affiliation did not come easily. Several members of the AFL-CIO's executive council argued that the group was too small to affiliate. Affiliation was also opposed on the basis that members of the group were not historically discriminated against in collective bargaining, and that the members should work through their local and international unions. This claim led to accusations by some members of the executive council and the LGBT union community that those opposing affiliation were homophobic. But AFL-CIO president John Sweeney pushed hard for the affiliation. When a final vote was taken, opponents of affiliation abstained rather than vote no.

PAW's relationship to the AFL-CIO proved rocky at first. Unlike other AFL-CIO constituent organizations, Pride at Work was not given a budget to help fund its operations until 1999. [26] In 2006, funding was still minimal. From the outset, however, PAW was given full access to AFL-CIO state and local labor councils and international member unions, enhancing its research and mobilization efforts substantially. [27] [28]

Structure

Pride at Work is a non-profit organization. It has seven executive officers: male-identified and female-identified co-presidents, male-identified and female-identified vice co-presidents, an organizing vice president, a treasurer and a secretary. The co-presidents co-chair the National Executive Board and the Executive Committee of the organization. Each officer has a three-year term, with elections held at the organization's convention.

PAW's policy-making body is the National Executive Board (NEB). The NEB is composed of the seven executive officers; chapter representatives elected from the chapters; a member appointed by the president of the AFL-CIO; members from each recognized international union's LGBT union caucus (with a maximum one member per international); and a maximum of six 'diversity representatives' appointed by the aforementioned members of the NEB. PAW's National Executive Board meets at least once a year.

Representation on the NEB is proportionate to membership. A chapter which represents 10 percent or more of the organization's membership is entitled to two representatives on the NEB. Chapters which represent at least 5 percent but no more than 10 percent of the organization's membership are entitled to one representative on the NEB. Each June 30 in a non-convention year, smaller chapters may seek recognition from the organization to determine whether they meet the 5 percent cut-off mark. Small chapters not meeting the rule may elect two board members, who then represent all small chapters. Board members serve for three-year terms.

Diversity representatives are important to PAW's work as a new organization. Categories covered under diversity include but are not limited to race, industrial sector, rank and file status, gender identity, union representation, gender, age and geographic area (especially those targeted for new chapter organizing). Diversity representatives are charged with advocating for their diversity group under PAW's constitution.

An executive committee governs the organization in the absence of the National Executive Board. The executive committee is composed of the seven officers as well as however many other members the NEB sees fit to elect to it. The executive committee meets at least twice a year, but often more frequently.

The PAW staff is small. Constitutionally, there must be at least one Executive Director. The Executive Director is appointed by a majority vote of the executive committee. There is currently a National Program and Membership Coordinator who works under the direction of the Executive Director.

PAW's members, assembled in membership meetings, are the highest decision-making body within the organization. Members may be at-large or members of local chapters. Chapters are largely autonomous. As of 2023, PAW has 31 established chapters. PAW holds a quadrennial convention, usually in August or September. The most recent convention was held in Minneapolis in 2022.

Goals and program

Pride at Work members distribute literature and educate the public about union organizing campaigns affecting LGBTQ workers at the Capital Pride street festival in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2009. PrideatWork DCCapitalPride 2009.JPG
Pride at Work members distribute literature and educate the public about union organizing campaigns affecting LGBTQ workers at the Capital Pride street festival in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2009.

Pride at Work exists to build tolerance and support for LGBTQ+ members in the workplace and in labor unions.

The organization educates LGBTQ+ people about their rights as workers, the organized labor movement and the principles of trade union solidarity; encourages and assists LGBTQ+ workers to organize and to become active participants in the trade union movement; opposes discrimination on the job and in unions based on sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, race, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, religion or political views; encourages LGBTQ+ workers to register and vote to exercise their full rights and responsibilities of citizenship at the local, state and national levels; and educates the union movement and the public about the economic and social needs and interests of LGBTQ+ workers.

PAW also helps educate union members on larger political questions of importance to the LGBTQ+ community, such as gender identity-anti-discrimination protections and marriage equality.

Nationally, PAW led the struggle for domestic partnership benefits, an issue important to LGBTQ+ couples and non-married heterosexuals. PAW has also recently undertaken an initiative to advocate for health care benefits for the special needs of transgender workers. [29]

Staff

Jerame Davis, Executive Director; Elizabeth Rockett, National Program and Membership Director

Pride at Work v. Granholm

Pride at Work is the lead plaintiff in National Pride at Work v. Granholm, No. 05-368-CZ (55th Dist. Ct. September 27, 2005). In 2004, the state of Michigan amended its constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. After enactment of the amendment (known as Proposal 2), Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm questioned the legality of providing state-funded domestic partnership benefits. In May 2005, Pride at Work, on behalf of its members at Michigan State University and other state agencies, filed a complaint seeking to establish that the amendment does not bar public employers from providing benefits to domestic partners. Pride at Work argued in its brief that domestic partnership benefits are a contractual relationship unrelated to marital status and are not preempted by the amendment. On September 27, 2005, district court judge Joyce Draganchuk agreed, and issued summary judgment for the plaintiffs.

The state of Michigan appealed. On October 31, 2005, the Michigan Court of Appeals granted the state attorney general's motion to stay the decision and accelerate the appeal. On April 11, 2006, a panel of three Michigan Court of Appeals judges heard oral arguments on the amendment prohibiting public employers from offering domestic partner benefits.

On February 2, 2007, a unanimous three-judge panel of the state Court of Appeals ruled that the amendment bans domestic partner benefit plans. The ruling dismissed Pride at Work's claim that the amendment deprives same-sex couples of the equal protection of the law. "Consistent with the state's long public policy tradition of favoring the institution of marriage," the court wrote, "the marriage amendment's purpose, 'to secure and preserve the benefits of marriage for our society and for future generations of children...' is neither arbitrary nor invidious on its face." [30] Pride at Work immediately appealed the ruling.

Pride at Work v. Governor of Michigan

In Pride at Work v. Governor of Michigan, 481 Mich. 56 (2008), the Supreme Court of Michigan interpreted the state's 2004 constitutional amendment providing that only different-sex unions may be "recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose." The court ruled that the statute prohibited public employers from offering health insurance benefits to employees' same-sex domestic partners because domestic partnerships are "similar unions" to marriage. [31]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 Santora (2001 , p. 99)
  2. Bain, "A Short History of Lesbian and Gay Labor Activism in the United States," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 59.
  3. Wolf, Sexuality and Socialism: History, Politics, and Theory of LGBT Liberation, 2009, p. 15.
  4. 1 2 Bain, "A Short History of Lesbian and Gay Labor Activism in the United States," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 60.
  5. NUMCS also had a number of openly gay African-American men serving in leadership positions.
  6. Starr, Golden Dreams: California in an Age of Abundance, 1950-1963, 2009, p. 470; Bullough, Before Stonewall: Activists for Gay and Lesbian Rights in Historical Context, 2002, p. 84.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Santora (2001 , p. 100)
  8. National Archives and Records Administration Our Documents: 100 Milestone Documents From the National Archives, 2003, p. 232; Persons, The Expanding Boundaries of Black Politics, 2007, p. 51; O'Brien, George G. Higgins and the Quest for Worker Justice: The Evolution of Catholic Social Thought in America, 2004, p. 338; Harris, "A. Phillip Randolph, Black Workers, and the Labor Movement," in Labor Leaders in America, 1987, p. 276.
  9. Rustin's homosexuality became public knowledge in 1953, when he was arrested in Los Angeles, California, for gay behavior. D'Emilio (2003 , pp. 191–193).
  10. Levine, Bayard Rustin and the Civil Rights Movement, 1999, p. 175-176.
  11. Tom Kahn's life motivated several discussions:
    • Horowitz, Rachelle (2007). "Tom Kahn and the fight for democracy: A political portrait and personal recollection" (PDF). Democratiya (Merged with Dissent in 2009). 11: 204–251. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-10-12.
    • Kastor, Elizabeth (12 August 1992). "A Death in the Office: AIDS took Tom Kahn. For his co-workers, the pain goes on". The Washington Post (Final ed.). Washington, D.C. p. C1. Payment required. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
    • Phelps, Christopher (January 2007). "A neglected document on socialism and sex (Appendix reprinting: H. L. Small, "Socialism and sex", Young Socialist (Winter 1952) p. 21)". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1353/sex.2007.0042. JSTOR   30114199. PMID   19241620. S2CID   41935808. Reprinted in New Politics. Summer 2008 Vol:XII, 1; Issue 45.
  12. Bain, "A Short History of Lesbian and Gay Labor Activism in the United States," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 61, 68.
  13. 1 2 3 Santora (2001 , p. 101)
  14. Fairchild and Hayward, Now That You Know: A Parents' Guide to Understanding Their Gay and Lesbian Children, 1998, p. 98.
  15. Heath and Palenchar, Strategic Issues Management: Organizations and Public Policy Challenges, 2009, p. 371.
  16. Friedman, Consumer Boycotts: Effecting Change Through the Marketplace and the Media, 1999, p. 126; Russ Bellant, The Coors Connection: How Coors Family Philanthropy Undermines Democratic Pluralism, 1991, p. 66; Kates, Twenty Million New Customers!: Understanding Gay Men's Consumer Behavior, 1998, p. 157; Badgett, Money, Myths, and Change: The Economic Lives of Lesbians and Gay Men, 2001, p. 124.
  17. 1 2 3 Wolf, Sexuality and Socialism: History, Politics, and Theory of LGBT Liberation, 2009, p. 246.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Santora (2001 , p. 102)
  19. Miller, Out of the Past: Gay and Lesbian History From 1869 to the Present, 2006, p. 369.
  20. Rimmerman, From Identity to Politics: The Lesbian and Gay Movements in the United States, 2002, p. 130; Harbeck, Gay and Lesbian Educators: Personal Freedoms, Public Constraints, 1997, p. 243.
  21. Santora (2001 , pp. 102–103)
  22. Bain, "A Short History of Lesbian and Gay Labor Activism in the United States," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 69.
  23. Frank, "Lesbian and Gay Caucuses in the U.S. Labor Movement," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 87-100.
  24. Bain, "A Short History of Lesbian and Gay Labor Activism in the United States," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 74-78.
  25. Bain, "A Short History of Lesbian and Gay Labor Activism in the United States," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 73.
  26. Bain, "A Short History of Lesbian and Gay Labor Activism in the United States," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 81.
  27. Noyes, "Coming Out for Union Democracy: AUD at Pride at Work," Union Democracy Review, August/September 2001.
  28. Hunt, "What Can Be Done? Sexual Diversity and Labor Unions in Perspective," in Laboring for Rights: Unions and Sexual Diversity Across Nations, 1999, p. 2.
  29. Cartwright, "Protecting Lesbian, Gay, and Transgender Members," Labor Notes, May 29, 2008.
  30. Leonard, "Partner Benefits Barred in Michigan," Gay City News, February 8, 2007.
  31. HRC Michigan Decisions Archived 2009-08-17 at the Wayback Machine

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT movements</span> Social movements

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) movements are social movements that advocate for LGBT people in society. Although there is not a primary or an overarching central organization that represents all LGBT people and their interests, numerous LGBT rights organizations are active worldwide. The first organization to promote LGBT rights was the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee, founded in 1897 in Berlin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AFL-CIO</span> Federation of American trade unions

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) is a national trade union center that is the largest federation of unions in the United States. It is made up of 60 national and international unions, together representing more than 12 million active and retired workers. The AFL-CIO engages in substantial political spending and activism, typically in support of progressive and pro-labor policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coors Brewing Company</span> American brewery and beer company

The Coors Brewing Company is an American brewery and beer company based in Golden, Colorado that was founded in 1873. In 2005, Adolph Coors Company, the holding company that owned Coors Brewing, merged with Molson, Inc. to become Molson Coors. The first Coors brewery location in Golden, Colorado is the largest single brewing facility operating in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urvashi Vaid</span> Indian-American LGBT rights activist, lawyer and writer (1958–2022)

Urvashi Vaid was an Indian-born American LGBT rights activist, lawyer, and writer. An expert in gender and sexuality law, she was a consultant in attaining specific goals of social justice. She held a series of roles at the National LGBTQ Task Force, serving as executive director from 1989-1992 — the first woman of color to lead a national gay-and-lesbian organization. She is the author of Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation (1995) and Irresistible Revolution: Confronting Race, Class and the Assumptions of LGBT Politics (2012).

The origin of the LGBT student movement can be linked to other activist movements from the mid-20th century in the United States. The Civil Rights Movement and Second-wave feminist movement were working towards equal rights for other minority groups in the United States. Though the student movement began a few years before the Stonewall riots, the riots helped to spur the student movement to take more action in the US. Despite this, the overall view of these gay liberation student organizations received minimal attention from contemporary LGBT historians. This oversight stems from the idea that the organizations were founded with haste as a result of the riots. Others historians argue that this group gives too much credit to groups that disagree with some of the basic principles of activist LGBT organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ruth Simpson (activist)</span>

Ruth Simpson was the founder of the United States' first lesbian community center, an author, and former president of Daughters of Bilitis, New York.

Gary William Kinsman is a Canadian sociologist. Born in Toronto, he is one of Canada's leading academics on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender issues. In 1987, he wrote one of the key Canadian texts on LGBT social history, Regulation of Desire, reprinted in 1995. In 2000, he edited and co-authored a second work, on Canadian federal government surveillance of marginal and dissident political and social groups, Whose National Security? In 2010, Kinsman's newest book, The Canadian War on Queers: National Security as Sexual Regulation, co-written with Patrizia Gentile, was published by University of British Columbia Press and released on 1 March.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance</span> U.S. AFL–CIO constituency group

The Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance (APALA) is a nonprofit organization of Asian-Pacific American trade union members affiliated with the AFL–CIO. It was the "first and only national organization for Asian Pacific American union members".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coalition of Labor Union Women</span> U.S. nonprofit organization

The Coalition of Labor Union Women (CLUW) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization of trade union women affiliated with the AFL–CIO. The CLUW is a bridging organization that seeks to create connections between the feminist movement and the labor movement in the United States. The organization works towards overcoming past constraints and conflicts in pursuance of relationship improvement between those movements, and thus enabling broad coalitions. The CLUW is the only national organization solely for women union members and is one of six constituency groups within the AFL–CIO. It is based in the headquarters of the AFL–CIO in Washington, D.C. CLUW pursues by four goals: to bring women into union leadership, to organize unorganized women workers, to bring women's issues onto the labor agenda, and to involve women into political action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT pride</span> Positive stance toward LGBT people

LGBT pride is the promotion of the self-affirmation, dignity, equality, and increased visibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people as a social group. Pride, as opposed to shame and social stigma, is the predominant outlook that bolsters most LGBT rights movements. Pride has lent its name to LGBT-themed organizations, institutes, foundations, book titles, periodicals, a cable TV channel, and the Pride Library.

Gloria Johnson was an important figure within the LGBT community in San Diego, California.

The California Immigrant Workers Association(CIWA) was an AFL–CIO associate membership organization from 1989–1994. Initiated by AFL–CIO regional director David Sicker with support from labor unions in California, CIWA helped undocumented immigrants to regularized their immigration status under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, and supported organizing campaigns among immigrant workers into the labor movement.

The Gay and Lesbian Labor Activists Network (GALLAN) is a non-profit organization of trade unionists founded in 1987 by Tess Ewing, Harneen Chernow, Susan Moir, Cheryl Schaffer, Nancy Marks, Gerry Thomas, Tom Barbara and Diane Fry and a few other members of Boston's LGBTQ community. GALLAN's main purpose was to support LGBTQ rights and oppose homophobia in the workforce, as well as push its unions to campaign for anti-discriminatory measures and benefits packages. GALLAN started as a series of potluck dinners and discussions, and later hosted events for the community in partnership with labor unions to campaign for LGBTQ rights in Massachusetts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rainbow capitalism</span> Capitalist appropriation and assimilation of sexual diversity

Rainbow capitalism is the involvement of capitalism, corporatism, and consumerism in appropriating and profiting from the LGBT movement. It developed in the 20th and 21st centuries as the LGBT community became more accepted in society and developed sufficient purchasing power, known as pink money. Early rainbow capitalism was limited to gay bars and gay bathhouses, though it expanded to most industries by the early-21st century.

Pat Norman was an American activist for women's rights, as well as the rights of the African American and LGBT communities.

The National LGBTQ Wall of Honor is an American memorial wall in Greenwich Village, Lower Manhattan, New York City, dedicated to LGBTQ "pioneers, trailblazers, and heroes". Located inside the Stonewall Inn, the wall is part of the Stonewall National Monument, the first U.S. National Monument dedicated to LGBTQ rights and history. The first fifty nominees were announced in June 2019, with the wall unveiled on June 27, 2019, as a part of Stonewall 50 – WorldPride NYC 2019 events. Five honorees will be added annually.

Nancy Wohlforth is an American union leader and activist who has advocated for a variety of civil, labor, and LGBTQ causes throughout her career including single-payer healthcare, domestic partner worker benefits, and non-discrimination protections for LGBTQ workers. She was the first out member of the LGBTQ community to be elected to the AFL–CIO Executive Council in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coors strike and boycott</span> 20th century labor action against Coors Brewing Company

The Coors strike and boycott was a series of boycotts and strike action against the Coors Brewing Company, based in Golden, Colorado, United States. Initially local, the boycott started in the late 1960s and continued through the 1970s, coinciding with a labor strike at the company's brewery in 1977. The strike ended the following year in failure for the union, which Coors forced to dissolve. The boycott, however, lasted until the mid-1980s, when it was more or less ended.

References

Bibliography

Further reading