Public value

Last updated

Public value describes the value that an organization or activity contributes to society. The term was originally coined by Harvard professor Mark H. Moore who saw it as the equivalent of shareholder value in public management. Public value is supposed to provide managers with a notion of how entrepreneurial activity can contribute to the common good. Nowadays, public value is no longer limited to the public sector, but is used by all types of organization, including non-governmental organizations and private sector firms. Therefore, the public value researcher Timo Meynhardt from the University of St. Gallen and HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management uses the term to generally raise the question about organizations' contribution to the common good. He believes that current management concepts, such as shareholder value, stakeholder value, customer value, sustainability or corporate social responsibility, should legitimize themselves in regard to their impact on the common good. [1] In his (social-)psychological-based concept, public value emerges for individuals from the experiences made in social structures and relationships. Hence, it can be seen as a prerequisite and a resource for successful living. [2]

Contents

Definitions

Public value is value for the public. It equates managerial success in the public sector with initiating and reshaping public sector enterprises in ways that increase their value to the public in both the short and the long run. Moore, 1995 [3] According to a recent systematic review of empirical public value research, public value has four key dimensions: outcome achievement (i.e. the extent to which a public body is improving publicly valued outcomes across a wide variety of areas), trust and legitimacy (i.e. the extent to which an organisation and its activities are trusted and perceived to be legitimate by the public and by key stakeholders), service delivery quality (i.e the extent to which services are experienced as being delivered in high‐quality manner that is considerate of users' needs), and efficiency (i.e. the extent to which an organisation is achieving maximal benefits with minimal resources). [4]

Public values are those providing normative consensus about (1) the rights, benefits, and prerogatives to which citizens should (and should not) be entitled; (2) the obligations of citizens to society, the state and one another; and (3) the principles on which governments and policies should be based. [5] Public Value is the combined view of the public about what they regard as valuable. Talbot, 2006. [6] Value for the public is therefore situated in relationships between the individual and society, founded in individuals, constituted by subjective evaluations against basic needs, activated by and realized in emotional-motivational states, and produced and reproduced in experience-intense practices. Meynhardt, 2009 [2]

In the public sector

The research program on public value was kicked off by Professor Mark H. Moore of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, who published a book on the subject, Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government, in 1995. In this sense, public value can be instituted as an organising principle in a public sector organisation, providing a focus in the context of which individual employees are free to pursue and propose new ideas about how to improve the working of the organisation, in terms of efficiency or services. Public organisations seeking to use public value as a principle need to create a corporate culture in which the pursuit of public values by employees is rewarded just as pursuing shareholder value is rewarded in private corporations.

The concept has been taken up initially by academics, think tanks and NGOs, and later by a number of public sector organisations in the United Kingdom and other countries.

In 2004 it was used by the BBC as the cornerstone of its manifesto for the renewal of its charter. [7] [8]

In 2006 Accenture launched the Institute for Public Service Value (IPSV), to explore how public value is created in government organizations. [9] Greg Parston, co-founder and former Chief Executive of the Office for Public Management, and a collaborator with Professor Moore, was appointed Director. Among many other studies, IPSV conducted the Global Cities Forum in 2007-2009, which facilitated citizens' deliberations on their experiences and expectations of public value in 17 cities around the world.

In 2006, the Center for Technology in Government (CTG) in partnership with SAP AG, conducted research on the topic of public value in the context of governments' investments in information technology (IT). [10] The results of this research found that governments' ability to realize the full value of IT investments is not completely measurable in terms of financial results. More specifically, the five U.S. and international governments studied, looked for the full value of government IT investments in both the internal value to government operations and the broader political and social returns to the public at large. [11]

From this point of view, there are two sources of public value:

  1. value that results from improving the government itself as an asset to society and
  2. value that results from the delivery of specific benefits directly to persons or groups. [12]

In November 2006, UK-based The Work Foundation [13] published a report on their project, titled Deliberative democracy and the role of public managers [14] , followed in October 2008 by Public Value: The Next Steps in Public Service Reform [15]

The German Federal Employment Agency uses the public value concept to better understand its contribution to society that goes beyond simple task fulfillment and make it a yardstick for management decisions. An empirical study has shown that a particular value of this organization is seen in its contribution to social peace in Germany. [16]

In the private sector

Public value is also taken up by private sector companies that want to maintain a license to operate and understand what implications new strategies and projects might have in terms of public value creation/ destruction. Such analyses can be done using a Public Value Scorecard as proposed by Timo Meynhardt and Peter Gomez. [17] Public value acknowledges that established business paradigms such as customer value or stakeholder value risk overemphasizing certain aspects of business' value contribution to society at the expense of other important dimensions. It pledges for a redefinition of the entire notion of value creation as it takes utilitarian and hedonistic as well as political and moral aspects of value creation into account. [18]

A number of firms use public value to obtain management information helping to take strategic decisions. [19] Examples include:

The Strategic Triangle

When further developing his thinking on public value, Moore focused his book Recognizing Public Value (2013) on how to assist public managers to focus on creating public value within the environment they work within, rather than as a theoretical framework. [22] Moore created the strategic triangle as an analytical framework to help turn abstract possibilities into the concrete circumstances managers are facing. [23] The strategic triangle is used by many public managers across the world, to understand and measure the public value they create and what kind of capability and capacity is required to create it. [23]

The framework asks three critical questions about the outcome being sought:

  1. Does it create public value?
  2. Is there legitimacy and support for the conception of public value?
  3. Is there operational capacity to get it done?

These three questions create the points of the strategic triangle. [22] The challenge for public managers is to ensure that all three of these points are in alignment and mutually reinforcing. [23]

Public Value

Within the strategic triangle public value is also referred to as the ‘task environment’. [23] This is because when a public manager assesses what social conditions can be improved by the government, they must look at individuals needs and the valued social conditions they live within. [23] When government assets are used to change that task environment, public value is created. [23]

Legitimacy and Support

A key determining factor on whether a public manager is able to achieve public value is the amount of legitimacy and support they can generate within their authorising environment. [22] This authorising environment is made up of all the people who can call the organisation to account, to evaluate its performance and value, and has control over the resources it needs to deliver. [22] The authorising environment often includes individual citizens (i.e. voters and taxpayers), advocates (e.g. unions), the press, government agencies and non-governmental watchdog agencies. [23]

Operational Capacity

Operational capacity refers to whether the public manager has enough people and time to use government assets along a value chain to create the desired outcomes. [23] The value chain can be described as the ability to create the desired outcome through the flow of inputs to outputs. [23] The key characteristics of the value chain lie in how inputs flow through to outputs. These include the activities, processes, procedures, and programs of an organisation. [23] What nearly all public managers will face is low operational capacity to be able to deliver, so it is often only possible to achieve the outcome through partnership with other co-producers. [23]

The Strategic Triangle as an Analytical Framework

The strategic triangle can also be used as an analytical framework to assess empirical materials in research. [24] In a study by Höglund et al. (2021) of the Swedish public sector it was used to analyse the strategic management and management control practices at Region Stockholm and in particular, the Culture Unit. [25] It is challenging to find alignment among the three points of the strategic triangle when it comes to strategic management and public value creation. [25] Therefore, the study attempted to answer the question “How do management control practices enable and/or constrain strategic alignment”. [25]

The study was conducted through 34 interviews with 31 people between June 2017 and November 2019. [25] A range of documents were also collected as a part of the data collection. The researchers result findings were presented under three propositions. [25]

The first was that “strategic alignment is vulnerable to management control practices that have a strong focus on performance measurements”. [25] As the approach to creating public value was focused on using visionary objectives, performance measures and report systems, the results were that the focus on performance measurements created a misalignment among the three points in the strategic triangle. [25]

The second was that “strategic alignment is vulnerable to standardized management control practices”. [25] The study found that through standardising management control practices, there was a misalignment between the authorising environment and operational capacity, as it increased the administrative burden. [25]

The final was that “strategic alignment is vulnerable to politically driven management control practices”. [25] It was shown through the study that the interaction with politicians meant there was a greater focus on short-term goals and measurable outputs and that there were issues with political micromanagement. [25] This resulted in a lack of operational capacity and misalignment with the point of public value creation in the strategic triangle. [25]

The strength of the strategic triangle as an analytical framework is that it recognises the specifics and contextual issues of the public sector. [24] [26]

Related Research Articles

Strategic planning is an organization's process of defining its strategy or direction, and making decisions on allocating its resources to attain strategic goals.

In the field of management, strategic management involves the formulation and implementation of the major goals and initiatives taken by an organization's managers on behalf of stakeholders, based on consideration of resources and an assessment of the internal and external environments in which the organization operates. Strategic management provides overall direction to an enterprise and involves specifying the organization's objectives, developing policies and plans to achieve those objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the plans. Academics and practicing managers have developed numerous models and frameworks to assist in strategic decision-making in the context of complex environments and competitive dynamics. Strategic management is not static in nature; the models can include a feedback loop to monitor execution and to inform the next round of planning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Information management</span> Organisational activity concerning information lifecycle

Information management (IM) is the appropriate and optimized capture, storage, retrieval, and use of information. It may be personal information management or organizational. IM for organizations concerns a cycle of organizational activity: the acquisition of information from one or more sources, the custodianship and the distribution of that information to those who need it, and its ultimate disposal through archiving or deletion.

Information technology (IT)governance is a subset discipline of corporate governance, focused on information technology (IT) and its performance and risk management. The interest in IT governance is due to the ongoing need within organizations to focus value creation efforts on an organization's strategic objectives and to better manage the performance of those responsible for creating this value in the best interest of all stakeholders. It has evolved from The Principles of Scientific Management, Total Quality Management and ISO 9001 Quality management system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental resource management</span> Type of resource management

Environmental resource management is the management of the interaction and impact of human societies on the environment. It is not, as the phrase might suggest, the management of the environment itself. Environmental resources management aims to ensure that ecosystem services are protected and maintained for future human generations, and also maintain ecosystem integrity through considering ethical, economic, and scientific (ecological) variables. Environmental resource management tries to identify factors affected by conflicts that rise between meeting needs and protecting resources. It is thus linked to environmental protection, sustainability, integrated landscape management, natural resource management, fisheries management, forest management, and wildlife management, and others.

Sumantra Ghoshal was an Indian scholar and educator. He served as a Professor of Strategic and International Management at the London Business School, and was the founding Dean of the Indian School of Business in Hyderabad.

A federal enterprise architecture framework (FEAF) is the U.S. reference enterprise architecture of a federal government. It provides a common approach for the integration of strategic, business and technology management as part of organization design and performance improvement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Design management</span> Field of inquiry in business

Design management is a field of inquiry that uses design, strategy, project management and supply chain techniques to control a creative process, support a culture of creativity, and build a structure and organization for design. The objective of design management is to develop and maintain an efficient business environment in which an organization can achieve its strategic and mission goals through design. Design management is a comprehensive activity at all levels of business, from the discovery phase to the execution phase. "Simply put, design management is the business side of design. Design management encompasses the ongoing processes, business decisions, and strategies that enable innovation and create effectively-designed products, services, communications, environments, and brands that enhance our quality of life and provide organizational success." The discipline of design management overlaps with marketing management, operations management, and strategic management.

Organizational effectiveness is a concept organizations use to gauge how effective they are at reaching intended outcomes. Organizational effectiveness is both a powerful and problematic term. The strength of it is that it may be used to critically evaluate and improve organisational activities. It's problematic since it means various things to different individuals. And there are other alternative methods for measuring organizational performance. Organizational effectiveness embodies the degree to which firms achieve the goals they have decided upon, a question that draws on several different factors. Among those are talent management, leadership development, organization design and structure, design of measurements and scorecards, implementation of change and transformation, deploying smart processes and smart technology to manage the firm's human capital and the formulation of the broader Human Resources agenda.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to business management:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hybrid organization</span>

A hybrid organization is an organization that mixes elements, value systems and action logics of various sectors of society, i.e. the public sector, the private sector and the voluntary sector. A more general notion of hybridity can be found in Hybrid institutions and governance.

Business–IT alignment is a process in which a business organization uses information technology (IT) to achieve business objectives, such as improved financial performance or marketplace competitiveness. Some definitions focus more on outcomes that means ; for example,

Alignment is the capacity to demonstrate a positive relationship between information technologies and the accepted financial measures of performance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainability accounting</span>

Sustainability accounting was originated about 20 years ago and is considered a subcategory of financial accounting that focuses on the disclosure of non-financial information about a firm's performance to external stakeholders, such as capital holders, creditors, and other authorities. Sustainability accounting represents the activities that have a direct impact on society, environment, and economic performance of an organisation. Sustainability accounting in managerial accounting contrasts with financial accounting in that managerial accounting is used for internal decision making and the creation of new policies that will have an effect on the organisation's performance at economic, ecological, and social level. Sustainability accounting is often used to generate value creation within an organisation.

Creating shared value (CSV) is a business concept first introduced in a 2006 Harvard Business Review article, Strategy & Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. The concept was further expanded in the January 2011 follow-up piece entitled Creating Shared Value: Redefining Capitalism and the Role of the Corporation in Society. Written by Michael E. Porter, a leading authority on competitive strategy and head of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness at Harvard Business School, and Mark R. Kramer, of the Kennedy School at Harvard University and co-founder of FSG, the article provides insights and relevant examples of companies that have developed deep links between their business strategies and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Porter and Kramer define shared value as "the policies and practices that enhance the competitiveness of a company while simultaneously advancing social and economic conditions in the communities in which it operates", while a review published in 2021 defines the concept as "a strategic process through which corporations can turn social problems into business opportunities".

Co-production is an approach in the development and delivery of public services and technology in which citizens and other key stakeholders and concepts in human society are implicitly involved in the process. In co-productive approaches, citizens are not only consulted, but are part of the conception, design, steering, and ongoing management of services. The concept has a long history, arising out of radical theories of knowledge in the 1970s, and can be applied in a range of sectors across society including health research, and science more broadly.

Benefits Realization Management (BRM) is one of the many ways of managing how time and resources are invested into making desirable changes.

In organizational theory, organizational analysis or industrial analysis is the process of reviewing the development, work environment, personnel, and operation of a business or another type of association. This review is often performed in response to crisis, but may also be carried out as part of a demonstration project, in the process of taking a program to scale, or in the course of regular operations. Conducting a periodic detailed organizational analysis can be a useful way for management to identify problems or inefficiencies that have arisen in the organization but have yet to be addressed, and develop strategies for resolving them.

Traditionally, market orientation (MO) focuses on microenvironment and the functional management of an organisation. However, contemporary organisations have widened their focus to incorporate more roles, functions and emphasis on the macro environment. Firms have been concerned with short run success and often not taken into account the long-run ecological, social and economic effects from their activities. Despite growth in the MO concept, there is still a need to reconceptualise the concept with a greater emphasis on external factors that influence a firm.

Information culture is closely linked with information technology, information systems, and the digital world. It is difficult to give one definition of information culture, and many approaches exist.

The Integrated Management Concept, or IMC is an approach to structure management challenges by applying a "system-theoretical perspective that sees organisations as complex systems consisting of sub-systems, interrelations, and functions". The most characteristic aspect of the IMC is its distinction between three particular management dimensions: normative, strategic, and operational management, which are held together by different integration mechanisms. The normative management dimension determines the general aim of the organization, the strategic dimension directs the plans, basic structures, systems, and the problem-solving behaviour of the staff for achieving it, and the operative level translates the normative missions and strategic programs into day-to-day organizational processes.

References

  1. ↑ Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public Value: Organisationen machen Gesellschaft. In: OrganisationsEntwicklung. Zeitschrift für Unternehmensentwicklung und Change Management 2013, Nr. 4, S. 4-7.
  2. 1 2 Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public Value Inside: What is Public Value Creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32 (3-4), 192-219.
  3. ↑ Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value – Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  4. ↑ Faulkner, N., & Kaufman, S. (2018). Avoiding theoretical stagnation: a systematic review and framework for measuring public value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(1), 69-86.
  5. ↑ Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  6. ↑ Talbot, C. (2006). Paradoxes and prospects of 'Public Value. Paper presented at Tenth International research Symposium on Public Management, Glasgow
  7. ↑ Building public value: Renewing the BBC for a digital world (PDF). BBC. 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2016.
  8. ↑ Crabtree, James (27 September 2004). "The revolution that started in a library". New Statesman. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  9. ↑ "Accenture Launches Institute for Public Service Value to Identify and Promote Leading Practices in Government Service Delivery | Accenture Newsroom". newsroom.accenture.com. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  10. ↑ Chohan, U.W. (2021). Public Value and the Digital Economy. Routledge, UK.
  11. ↑ Advancing Return on Investment Analysis for Government IT: A Public Value Framework (PDF). Center for Technology in Government, The Research Foundation of State University of New York. 2006.
  12. ↑ Benington, J. (2009). Creating the public in order to create public value?. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 232-249.
  13. ↑ "The Work Foundation". Work Foundation. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  14. ↑ Horner, Louise; Lehki, Rohit; Blaug, Ricardo (November 2006). "Deliberative democracy and the role of public managers: Final report of The Work Foundation's public value consortium". CiteSeerX   10.1.1.501.7274 .
  15. ↑ Coats, David; Passmore, Eleanor (September 2008). "Public value: The next steps in public service reform". CiteSeerX   10.1.1.549.8241 .
  16. ↑ Meynhardt, T. und Bartholomes, S. (2011). (De)Composing Public Value: In Search of Basic Dimensions and Common Ground. International Public Management Journal, 14 (3), 284–308.
  17. ↑ Meynhardt, T. and Gomez, P. (2013). Organisationen schöpfen Wert für die Gesellschaft. In: Heuser, J. et al. DIE ZEIT erklärt die Wirtschaft (199–207). Hamburg: Murmann.
  18. ↑ Meynhardt, T., Gomez, P. and Schweizer, M. (2014). The Public Value Scorecard: what makes an organization valuable to society? Performance, 6 (1), 2–9.
  19. ↑ Public Value: Common Good and the Society. Movie by the University of St. Gallen.
  20. ↑ Armsen, W.; Lampe, R.; Moeller, S. and Gatti, E. (2013); Gesundheitsdienstleistungen in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung: Die Messung des gesellschaftlichen Nutzens privatisierter Gesundheitsdienstleistungen. OrganisationsEntwicklung, 2013 (4), 20-26
  21. ↑ Beringer, L. and Bernard, S. (2013); Stern des Südens- Fußballverein oder weltweites Entertainment?: Der Public Value des FC Bayern München, OrganisationsEntwicklung, 2013 (4), 13-19
  22. 1 2 3 4 Moore, Mark (2013). Recognizing Public Value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Moore, Mark (21 August 2017). "Public Value: Of, By, and For the People" (PDF).
  24. 1 2 Alford, John; Carsten, Greve (2017). "Strategy in the public and private sectors: similarities, differences and changes". Administrative sciences. 7 (4): 171–191.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Höglund, Linda; Mårtensson, Maria; Kerstin, Thomson (2021). "Strategic management, management control practices and public value creation: the strategic triangle in the Swedish public sector". Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 34 (7): 1608–1634.
  26. ↑ Alford, John; O'Flynn, Janine (2009). "Making sense of public value: concepts, critiques and emergent meanings". International Journal of Public Administration. 32 (3–4): 171–191.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.