Resultative

Last updated

In linguistics, a resultative (abbreviated RES) is a form that expresses that something or someone has undergone a change in state as the result of the completion of an event. Resultatives appear as predicates of sentences, and are generally composed of a verb (denoting the event), a post-verbal noun phrase (denoting the entity that has undergone a change) and a so-called resultative phrase (denoting the state achieved as the result of the action named by the verb [1] ) which may be represented by an adjective, a prepositional phrase, or a particle, among others. [2] For example, in the English sentence The man wiped the table clean, the adjective clean denotes the state achieved by the table as a result of the event described as the man wiped.

Contents

Resultative constructions

Resultative constructions are set syntactic patterns used to express resultativeness. Within these structures, the object NP is viewed as having undergone some change of state, and the change is viewed as a result achieved through the action expressed by the combination of the verb and the result phrase. The word order of the elements is said to be constant and crucial in conveying the resultative meaning; under this analysis, the output in its entirety is regarded as having a more complex meaning than the sum of its components' individual meanings. This constructional approach has been proposed in order to account for the semantic differences between standalone verbs that have no intrinsic resultative meaning and their resultative counterparts (e.g. hammer versus hammer ... flat). [3]

Systems of differentiation

Syntactic trees showing the difference in structure between non-resultative and resultative phrases. Syntactic Trees Resultative.png
Syntactic trees showing the difference in structure between non-resultative and resultative phrases.

Resultative constructions can be described in the framework of a sign-oriented approach: morphological signals and word order signals (based on the ordering of lexical items) interact in order to create meaning. This interaction generates a system of oppositions based on two types of differentiation: differentiation of the referent from other referents in the lexicon and differentiation of the referent from itself. [4]

Differentiation from OtherDifferentiation from Self
He painted the red barn.He painted the barn red.
She wore her long hair.She wore her hair long.
He found the guilty man.He found the man guilty.
He made the sacred porridge.He made the porridge sacred.

Classes of resultative constructions

Semantically, resultative constructions can be part of one of four major classes, defined by two attributes: causative vs. non-causative, and property vs. path. (See table below.) These classes are distinguished by the relation between the noun phrase undergoing the change expressed by the resultative (referred to as the host) and the resultative construction itself. [2]

In causative resultatives.the host is the direct object of the resultative construction; the subject causes the host to undergo a change. In noncausative resultatives, the host is the subject of the resultative construction; the sentence states a change of state or position.

In property resultatives, the host comes to have the property expressed by the resultative construction. In path resultatives, the resultative construction describes a path that is traversed by the host.

CausativeNoncausative
PropertyThe gardener watered the tulipsflatThe lake froze solid
PathBill rolled the balldown the hillThe ball rolled down the hill

Traditional view

Defining the role and category of resultatives has inspired numerous approaches from linguists. Traditionally, certain tenses and aspects have been attributed to resultatives. Namely, the present perfect aspect is pointed to in explaining resultative constructions like I have written them a letter. [5] There is a stress on the sense of completeness inherent in resultatives: A: Have you cleaned the windows? B: No, I haven't finished them yet. B: Yes, but I haven't finished them yet

In this example, answering negatively entails that either some or none of the windows have been cleaned, but you cannot answer positively unless the entire task is completed. The task does not require successful completion as found in the example He has not passed his exam.

It has been demonstrated, however, that resultatives exist independently of the perfect in sentences like I turned this offer down, creating the need to reexamine the role of resultatives. [3] To address this, it has been claimed that the resultative expresses both a state and the preceding action it has resulted from. [6] This emphasizes that the resultative describes how a state was acted upon. Therefore, it must use the passive form. However, this analysis does not account for phrases such as I turned this offer down, which uses the active rather than the passive voice.

Sign-oriented analysis

Sign-oriented analyses present an aspectual contrast, in which the approach is based on the boundaries of predication within a time-field. [4] [7] An action is perceived as a whole within a predication or it could be perceived as the predication within the boundaries. [3] A markedness relationship is one between the perfective and imperfective. [8] This analysis argues against the view that the resultative meaning is identical to the perfect. Below are sentences where the verbs in the perfect do not have the ‘element of result’ in their meaning:

I’ve seen it before.It’s only been three or four times that we’ve come face to face.

In the sentences above ‘the element of result’ does not seem apparent. It is argued that the concrete result and the result phase should be distinguished from each other. [8]

The Guillaumean approach

This aspectual approach shows the relation between an action and its result. The Guillaumean approach posits that the English verb has two moments, one where any duration, any developments, or any actualizations take place with the event's duration. [9]

The Guillaumean Chart of notational chronology
beforeafter
causeeffect
conditionconsequence
operationresult

The resultative as a feature of English

Yet another approach to resultativeness views it as “a fundamental semantic distinctive feature which cuts across almost all traditional categories: verb, noun, adjective, infinitive, gerund, participle, particle, auxiliary”. [10] It is claimed that the resultative should be a distinctive feature in language instead of being a subcategory within the verbal aspect realm.

As a system of oppositions

Result-based oppositions in the lexicon Result-based oppositions.png
Result-based oppositions in the lexicon

This approach suggests the idea of viewing resultativeness as a system of oppositions. It hypothesizes that the resultative is not restricted to a tense or an aspect form. [3] It suggests that the resultativeness is expressed by oppositions of marked/unmarked forms throughout all language levels and subsystems. [3] Markedness is a system that contrasts two language forms as distinguished based on simplicity and frequency of usage.(For example, irregular verbs will be marked, whereas regular verbs will be unmarked)

These subsystems includes: morpheme, auxiliaries, lexical pairs, compounds, verb complements, tense aspect and voice forms, syntactic patters, types of sentences, word order, stress, and intonation. [3]

Gorlach, in her book, proposes that resultativeness happens depending whether the subsystem is marked or not. For example, in the sentence "I am wiping the table" the affix -ing is marked and expresses neutral state instead of resultative state. -ed, on the other hand, is unmarked form of affix, thus making the following sentence express resultativeness: "I wiped the table". [3]

Extended list of marked/unmarked form of all language subsystems can be found in the table.

Distribution

A resultative is either an adjectival phrase indicating the state of a noun resulting from the completion of the event denoted by the verb, or a verbal construction denoting the result state of an event. This verbal construction type of resultative is usually considered part of the field of aspect.

Adjectival resultatives

This type of resultative is a phrase that indicates the state of a noun resulting from the completion of the verb. In the English examples below, the affected noun is shown in bold and the resulting predicate is in italics:

Subjects of passive and unaccusative verbs may participate in resultative constructions:

Subjects of unergative verbs may also participate in resultative constructions, but a "dummy object", that is, an otherwise absent reflexive pronoun must be inserted:

Resultatives are distinct from depictive constructions, though often both a resultative and a depictive reading is possible from the same sentence. For example, in "John fried the fish dry", a resultative reading suggests that as a result of John's frying, the fish became dry. On the other hand, also possible is a depictive reading in which John is already dry, and that is the state in which he is frying the fish (because e.g. he had been back from the beach for long enough to be dry). Both depictives and resultatives are important in the understanding of small clauses because their exact properties seem to vary considerably from language to language.

Resultatives in German

In German, some verbs can occur in adjectival resultative sentences while others cannot. In the example below, an argument can be made that the noun phrase after the verb can be interpreted as a verb argument. [11]

Der

'The

Schmied

smith

hämmert

hammers

das

the

Metall

metal

flach.

flat.'

Der Schmied hämmert das Metall flach.

'The smith hammers the metal flat.'

Verbal resultatives

This sort of resultative is a grammatical aspect construction that indicates the result state of the event denoted by the verb. English does not have a productive resultative construction. It is widely accepted that the be-perfects of various European languages (e.g. French, Italian, German, and Dutch) began as resultative constructions. [12]

Resultatives in Mandarin

Mandarin places the resultative within an verb aspect construction.

张三擦干净了桌子。

Zhāngsān

Zhangsan

cā-gānjìng-le

wipe-clean-PFV

zhuōzi.

table

Zhāngsān cā-gānjìng-le zhuōzi.

Zhangsan wipe-clean-PFV table

'Zhangsan wiped the table clean.'

In this example, the resultative gānjìng is situated within the verb aspect construction. The verb cā- takes the theta roles of agent and experiencer. Resultative phrases may also take multiple theta-roles. The linguist Fengqi Li calls these “composite roles”. [13]

斧子砍钝了。

Fǔzi

Axe

kǎn-dùn-le

cut-dull-PFV

Fǔzi kǎn-dùn-le

Axe cut-dull-PFV

'The axe became dull because of overuse.'

Here, the theta-roles are agent, experiencer and instrument. The experiencer and instrument are both the ax, but they take composite roles. The verb cut is transitive and therefore requires a direct object. The composite role allows the knife to undergo its own action.

Resultatives in Japanese

The resultative construction in English might be represented as SVO AP.

a. John shot Mary dead.
b. John painted the wall blue.

The Japanese translation of the sentences a. and b. in the above table would have two distinct constructions. The first construction has a complex verb strategy, where V2 is the causative change of state verb, or result state corresponding to the AP in English construction. V1 is a verb of simple activity, which corresponds to V in the English construction. [14]

ジョンがメアリーを撃ち殺した。

Jon-ga

John-NOM

Mearī-o

Mary-ACC

uchi-koroshi-ta.

shoot-kill-PAST

Jon-ga Mearī-o uchi-koroshi-ta.

John-NOM Mary-ACC shoot-kill-PAST

'John shot Mary dead.'

Related Research Articles

In linguistics, a copula is a word or phrase that links the subject of a sentence to a subject complement, such as the word is in the sentence "The sky is blue" or the phrase was not being in the sentence "It was not being co-operative." The word copula derives from the Latin noun for a "link" or "tie" that connects two different things.

In grammar, tense is a category that expresses time reference. Tenses are usually manifested by the use of specific forms of verbs, particularly in their conjugation patterns.

A verb is a word that in syntax generally conveys an action, an occurrence, or a state of being. In the usual description of English, the basic form, with or without the particle to, is the infinitive. In many languages, verbs are inflected to encode tense, aspect, mood, and voice. A verb may also agree with the person, gender or number of some of its arguments, such as its subject, or object. Verbs have tenses: present, to indicate that an action is being carried out; past, to indicate that an action has been done; future, to indicate that an action will be done.

In linguistics, a participle is a nonfinite verb form that has some of the characteristics and functions of both verbs and adjectives. More narrowly, participle has been defined as "a word derived from a verb and used as an adjective, as in a laughing face".

In general linguistics, a labile verb is a verb that undergoes causative alternation; that is, it can be used both transitively and intransitively, with the requirement that the direct object of its transitive use corresponds to the subject of its intransitive use, as in "I ring the bell" and "The bell rings." Labile verbs are a prominent feature of English, but they also occur in many other languages. When causatively alternating verbs are used transitively they are called causatives since, in the transitive use of the verb, the subject is causing the action denoted by the intransitive version. When causatively alternating verbs are used intransitively, they are referred to as anticausatives or inchoatives because the intransitive variant describes a situation in which the theme participant undergoes a change of state, becoming, for example, "opened".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese grammar</span> Grammar of the Standard Chinese language

The grammar of Standard Chinese shares many features with other varieties of Chinese. The language almost entirely lacks inflection; words typically have only one grammatical form. Categories such as number and verb tense are often not expressed by grammatical means, but there are several particles that serve to express verbal aspect and, to some extent, mood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tzeltal language</span> Mayan language of Mexico

Tzeltal or Tseltal is a Mayan language spoken in the Mexican state of Chiapas, mostly in the municipalities of Ocosingo, Altamirano, Huixtán, Tenejapa, Yajalón, Chanal, Sitalá, Amatenango del Valle, Socoltenango, Las Rosas, Chilón, San Juan Cancuc, San Cristóbal de las Casas and Oxchuc. Tzeltal is one of many Mayan languages spoken near this eastern region of Chiapas, including Tzotzil, Chʼol, and Tojolabʼal, among others. There is also a small Tzeltal diaspora in other parts of Mexico and the United States, primarily as a result of unfavorable economic conditions in Chiapas.

Zero copula is a linguistic phenomenon whereby the subject is joined to the predicate without overt marking of this relationship. One can distinguish languages that simply do not have a copula and languages that have a copula that is optional in some contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bengali grammar</span> Grammar of the Bengali language

Bengali grammar is the study of the morphology and syntax of Bengali, an Indo-European language spoken in the Indian subcontinent. Given that Bengali has two forms, চলিত ভাষা and সাধু ভাষা, it is important to note that the grammar discussed below applies fully only to the চলিত (cholito) form. Shadhu bhasha is generally considered outdated and no longer used either in writing or in normal conversation. Although Bengali is typically written in the Bengali script, a romanization scheme is also used here to suggest the pronunciation.

The Elgeyo language, or Kalenjin proper, are a dialect cluster of the Kalenjin branch of the Nilotic language family.

A nonfinite verb, in contrast to a finite verb, is a derivative form of a verb that lacks inflection (conjugation) for number or person. In the English language, the nonfinite verb cannot perform action as the main verb of an independent clause, while in French, the first verb is typically the only finite one. In English, nonfinite verbs include infinitives, participles and gerunds. Nonfinite verb forms in some other languages include converbs, gerundives and supines. The categories of mood, tense, and or voice may be absent from non-finite verb forms in some languages.

Traditional grammar is a framework for the description of the structure of a language. The roots of traditional grammar are in the work of classical Greek and Latin philologists. The formal study of grammar based on these models became popular during the Renaissance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Farasan Islands</span>

The Farasan Islands are a small group of coral islands approximately 40 km off the coast of Jizan in the Red Sea, belonging to Saudi Arabia.

While other word categories in Ilocano are not as diverse in forms, verbs are morphologically complex inflecting chiefly for aspect. Ilocano verbs can also be cast in any one of five foci or triggers. In turn, these foci can inflect for different grammatical moods.

This article describes the grammar of the Khmer (Cambodian) language, focusing on the standard dialect.

This article summarizes grammar in the Hawaiian language.

Nominal sentence is a linguistic term that refers to a nonverbal sentence. As a nominal sentence does not have a verbal predicate, it may contain a nominal predicate, an adjectival predicate, in Semitic languages also an adverbial predicate or even a prepositional predicate. In Egyptian-Coptic, however, as in the majority of African languages, sentences with adverbial or prepositional predicate show a distinctly different structure. The relation of nominal sentences to verbal sentences is a question of tense marking. In most languages with nominal sentences such as Russian, Arabic and Hebrew, the copular verb does not surface in indicatival present tense sentences. Conversely, these languages allow the copular verb in non-present sentences.

This article deals with the grammar of the Udmurt language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uses of English verb forms</span> Conjugation, finiteness and verb conversion in English grammar

This article describes the uses of various verb forms in modern standard English language. This includes:

Saliba is an Oceanic language spoken on the islets off the southeastern tip of Papua New Guinea. There are approximately 2,500 speakers of Saliba. Significant documentation of the language was undertaken by the Saliba-Logea documentation project, and hundreds of audio-video resources can be found in the project archive.

References

  1. ↑ Levin, Beth. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. 1 2 Goldberg, A. E. & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions. Language, 80, 532-568.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gorlach, Marina (2004). Phrasal constructions and resultativeness in English : a sign-oriented analysis . Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. p.  54. ISBN   9027215618.
  4. 1 2 Diver, W. (1986). The Grammar of Modern English. ms: Columbia University.
  5. ↑ Depraetere, Ilse (1998). On the resultative character of present perfect sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 29, 5 (1998) 608.
  6. ↑ Nedjalkov, Vladimir (1988). Typology of Resultative Constructions. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (English translation edited by Bernard Comrie.).
  7. ↑ Huffman, A. "Teaching the English tenses". Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics. 10, i–iv, 1–153, xvi–xxi.
  8. 1 2 Allen, R. L. (1966). The Verb System of Present-Day English. Mouton: The Hague.
  9. ↑ Hirtle, W (1975). Time, Aspect and the Verb. Quebec: Les Presses de l'Universite Laval.
  10. ↑ Tobin, Y. (1993). Aspect in the English Verb: Process and Result in Language. London: Longman.
  11. ↑ Richter, Michael; van Hout, Roeland (August 2010). "Why some verbs can form a resultative construction while others cannot: Decomposing semantic binding". Lingua. 120 (8): 2006–2021. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.007.
  12. ↑ Bybee, J., Perkins, R & Pagliuca, W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
  13. ↑ Li, Fengqi. (2011). "Theta-Structures of Mandarin Resultative Verb Compounds". Linguistik Online.
  14. ↑ Washio, Ryuichi (1997). "Resultatives, Compositionality and Language Variation". Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 1. 6 (1): 1–49. doi:10.1023/A:1008257704110. JSTOR   20100710. S2CID   115305827.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.