Reynato Puno y Serrano,KGCR (Filipino:Reynato Serrano Puno;born May 17,1940) is a Filipino jurist. He served as the 22nd chief justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines from December 8,2007,by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo until his mandatory retirement on May 17,2010. Puno had initially been appointed to the Supreme Court as an associate justice on June 28,1993.
Puno was appointed on January 23,2018,as the chairperson of the Consultative Committee to Review the 1987 Constitution by virtue of Executive Order No. 10.
Puno is also the chairman of the solar energy company named "GenWATT".[1][2][3][4]
Puno began his legal career in private practice. In 1969,he joined the law practice of his elder brother Isaac,a future judge whose murder at age 42 remains unsolved to date. In 1971,he joined the Office of the Solicitor General,where he would serve for the next nine years. In 1980,Puno was appointed by PresidentFerdinand Marcos as a Justice of the Court of Appeals. He rejoined the executive department in 1984,this time as a Deputy Minister of Justice. Upon the assumption into office of President Corazon Aquino in 1986,Puno was reappointed to the Court of Appeals.
Puno has been praised for his erudite and literary writing style. His predecessor as Chief Justice,Artemio Panganiban,once lauded Puno's writing in the following manner:"Like a trained surgeon,he uses his pen with razor-like precision to separate the excise fabrication from truth and pretension from reality. In the process,he gives life to populist causes and libertarian ideals. Darting,gutsy and erudite,he often wages lonely battles against conventional wisdom with his stirring dissents and insightful opinion." (Panganiban,Justice and Faith,p.142)
Freemason
Puno is a freemason and Past Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of the Philippines.[5][6] MW Reynato S. Puno PGM is from Hiram Lodge No. 88,and also a charter member of Jacques DeMolay Memorial Lodge No.305,and also a dual member of Dagohoy Lodge No. 84.[7]
Supreme Court term
Official Portraits of CJ Artemio Panganiban and Reynato S. Puno in the new SC building.
On June 28,1993,PresidentFidel V. Ramos appointed Puno as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court at the age of 53. He would serve in that capacity for the next 13 years. Upon the retirement of Justice Josue Bellosillo in 2003,Puno became the Senior Associate Justice.
Traditionally,the most senior Associate Justice was appointed to fill any permanent vacancy to the seat of the Chief Justice,though this tradition was not always observed. Upon the retirement of Chief Justice Hilario Davide Jr. in 2005,Puno,as the senior Associate Justice,was a leading candidate for appointment as the next Chief Justice. However,President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo instead appointed Associate Justice Artemio Panganiban as Chief Justice,marking the first time in 20 years that the senior Associate Justice was bypassed.
Justice Puno remained as the most senior Associate Justice for the twelve months of the term of Chief Justice Panganiban. Despite some speculation that President Arroyo would again bypass Puno and appoint either Associate Justice Leonardo Quisumbing or SenatorMiriam Defensor Santiago as Chief Justice,Puno was appointed to the post within hours from the retirement of Panganiban. Puno denied speculations that he will retire from the position of Chief Justice before May 17,2010.[8]
Performance rating
On January 7,2008,the Social Weather Stations (November 30 to December 3,2007) survey released the performance rating of Chief Justice Reynato Puno - 32% satisfied and 34% dissatisfied,or net –2,having been in single digit since March 2007.[9]
The World Peace Prize Awarding Council (WPPAC) Chief Judge and Co-Founder Lester Wolff and WPPAC Executive Judge and Co-Founder Dr. Han Min Su,WPPAC Sec. Gen. Judge Dr. Asher Naim,and WPPAC Judge Dr. Mohammad A. Cholkamy,on October,recognized Puno as 2008 Human Cultural Asset International.[14]
Puno was married to Luzviminda T. Delgado-Puno (1940–2006),a lawyer who had been the Clerk of Court of the Supreme Court from 1993 to 2005. She died at 5:10 am,April 12,2006,at the St. Luke's Medical Hospital,Quezon City due to complications from heart surgery.[15] On April 25,2007,Narcisa "Sisang" Serrano Puno,92,mother of Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno,died at the Philippine Heart Center in Quezon City.[16][17]
Year one
Extrajudicial killings summit
The 22nd Puno Supreme Court held a National Consultative Summit on extrajudicial killings on July 16 and 17,2007 at the Manila Hotel. Invited representatives from the three branches of the government participated (including the AFP,the PNP,CHR,media,academe,civil society and other stakeholders). Puno gave the keynote speech and closing remarks. Puno searches for major solutions to solve forced disappearances. During the first day of the summit,the speakers presented their respective papers comprising significant inputs from their respective sectors,while on the second day,the participants were broken up into 12 groups (chaired by a Justice) and take part in a workshop. Local and international observers (the diplomatic corps and representatives from various international organizations) were accredited. Puno informed that "the summit highlight will be a plenary session where each of the 12 groups shall report to the body their recommended resolutions. The reports and proposals were synthesized and then transmitted to the concerned government agencies for appropriate action". On the other hand,the earlier slated Malacañang-sponsored Mindanao Peace and Security Summit (July 8–10,2007 at Cagayan de Oro City),would focus on how to make the anti-terror law,or the Human Security Act (HSA) of 2007,more acceptable to the public. It would probably steal the thunder from Puno's own summit on extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances.[18][19]
On July 16,2007,Justices,activists,militant leaders,police officials,politicians and prelates attended the Supreme Court's two-day summit at the Manila Hotel in Manila City to map out ways to put an end to the string of extrajudicial killings in the country. Bayan was set to launch their "silent protest",but expressed support for the high court's initiative. Director Geary Barias,chief of the police's anti-killings Task Force Usig,Sen. Panfilo Lacson,Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim,Caloocan Bishop Deogracias Yñiguez,reelected party-list Representatives Satur Ocampo (Bayan Muna) and Crispin Beltran (Anakpawis) graced the affair. SC Chief Justice Reynato Puno said that the "National Consultative Summit on Extrajudicial Killings and Forced Disappearances:Searching for Solutions," would help stop the murders. Delegates were given 12 to 15 minutes each to share their insights and knowledge about the matter. Yniguez scored the government for failing to actively pursue investigations on the hundreds of killings,and the Catholic Church was alarmed that victims have been deprived of their "fundamental right" to live. Based on Yniguez-church's count,the number of victims of extrajudicial killings reached 778,while survivors of "political assassinations," was pegged at 370. He also noted 203 "massacre" victims,186 people who involuntarily disappeared,502 tortured,and others who were illegally arrested. Yniguez similarly criticized the government's alleged insistence to implement its Oplan Bantay Laya I and II,the military's counter-insurgency operation-plans which militants have said consider legal people's organizations as targets. Meanwhile,Bayan urged the Supreme Court to "check serious threats to civil liberties and basic freedoms" including the anti-terror law or the Human Security Act of 2007,which took effect on July 15 despite protests from leftist groups. Vice President Teofisto Guingona Jr. joined Bayan and other leftist groups as petitioners in their formal pleading before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the law. Human rights lawyer Edre Olalia of the International Association of People's Lawyers (IAPL) served as lead counsel. Bayan chair Carol Araullo said the respondents included members of the Anti-Terrorism Council headed by Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita and Raul Gonzalez. Earlier,CBCP president Angel Lagdameo pointed out at least 5 provisions of the law that may threaten civil liberties:Sec. 19 allows detentions of mere suspects for more than three days in the event of an actual or terrorist attack,while Section 26 allows house arrest despite the posting of bail,and prohibits the right to travel and to communicate with others;Sec. 39 allows seizure of assets while Sec. 7 allows surveillance or wiretapping of suspects;Sec. 26 allows the investigation of bank deposits and other assets.[20]
Puno SC summit called for truce,talks with insurgents,as the two-day summit ended:"Let us rather engage in the conspiracy of hope...and hope for peace." Puno said he would forward the summit's recommendation to President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo,the Senate and House of Representatives. "In the clash of arms,the laws are silent. We need to reduce violence,create conditions conducive to less violence based on the rule of law",Associate Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales said in the report. One group recommended that Republic Act 9372 or the Human Security Act be declared unconstitutional. All the groups agreed that insurgency is not only a military but also a political problem and said a ceasefire would be a sign of the government's goodwill and sincerity in forging genuine peace agreements with all rebel groups. They also recommended the use of the third-party approach to peace negotiations. Among the other recommendations of the summit are:-- for the Supreme Court to reexamine the case of Umil v. Ramos,which said rebellion and related crimes are continuing offenses,thus allowing the warrantless arrest of suspects;to carefully study the possibility of creating a new offense for the killings and assaults on journalists,judges and activities,akin to the law penalizing violence against woman and children;the establishment of sanctuaries where victims and witnesses can take refuge;for the President to certify and the Senate to ratify the Rome Statute,which established the International Criminal Court,and Protocol 1 of the Geneva Convention,which addresses the issue of making civilian populations or individual civilians the object of attacks;the enactment of a law addressing and accurately defining extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances;a study on the use of the writ of Amparo for greater protection of Constitutional rights,and a more creative and resourceful application of the writ of habeas corpus;suspending the presumption of regularity in the performance of official duty in cases of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearance;studying whether the government can continue invoking its immunity from suspension in cases of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances;allowing petitioners for the writ of habeas corpus to seek court orders to search the premises of police and military camps and stations in the presence of a representative from the Commission on Human Rights;requiring the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) to take DNA samples of unidentified cadavers for preservation in the Philippine National Police laboratory;the adoption of international standards of command responsibility;the enhancement of moral,ethical and constitutional values that put a premium on tolerance and the rule of law.
The CPP,however said that the abuses will continue "so long as the mastermind remains in power." "Extra-judicial killings and enforced disappearances will continue as long as the mastermind remains in power and enforces a deliberate state terrorist policy that sets the stage for gross violations of human rights." CPP spokesman Gregorio "Ka Roger" Rosal said that the New People's Army (NPA) and people's courts are conducting their own investigations and are intensifying efforts to investigate and resolve particular cases of extrajudicial killings and abductions. Rosal cited the case of Capt. Patrick Baesa,an intelligence officer under the notorious 901st Infantry Battalion,who was meted out revolutionary punishment last November 2006. Baesa,who was based in Irosin,Albay,was responsible for organizing the death squads which carried out the killings of Max Frivaldo,Ding Uy,Rei Mon Guran and Barangay Chairman Neal Futalan."But ultimately it is the Arroyo regime and its top security and military officials who should be punished for these heinous crimes",he said. Further,former vice president Teofisto Guingona and BAYAN petitioned the Court to declare the Human Security Act (HSA) unconstitutional. The 89-page petition for certiorari and prohibition with a prayer for temporary restraining order against the implementation of the anti-terror law. Other petitioners were Gabriela,Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas,Movement of Concerned Citizens for Civil Liberties,state workers' group COURAGE,Kadamay,Solidarity of Cavite Workers,League of Filipino Students,HEAD,Anakbayan,Pamalakaya,Alliance of Concerned Teachers,Migrante and AGHAM.[21][22][23]
Twin horrible deaths happened on / circa the same day last year,January 15,2007,that the Supreme Court of the Philippines' (logo or seal) was mysteriously burned into halves by an almost one-hour afternoon fire.[24][25] Despite different appeals by local and international groups,the spate of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines continued. On January 15,2008,Reynato Puno condemned the murder of Judge Roberto Navidad,Regional Trial Court,Branch 32,Calbayog,Samar,the 15th judge to be ambushed since July 20,1999,the 14th under the Arroyo government. Just starting his engine,black Nissan Patrol SUV,Natividad was shot in the face / left eye,at 7:10p.m. Monday,by a lone gunman,5'4" tall and medium-built,wearing black jacket,using a 45 caliber pistol.[26] On Tuesday,Catholicmissionary Rey Roda,Oblates of Marry Immaculate (OMI),54,was shot dead at 8:30p.m.,when he resisted abduction attempt by unidentified 10 armed men in a chapel at ikud Tabawan village,South Ubian,Tawi-Tawi,South Ubian. In February 1997,another OMI leader,Bishop Benjamin de Jesus was shot dead in front of the Jolocathedral.[27] In 2006,the Asian Human Rights Commission stated that there had been 26 priests,pastors,and churchmen who were liquidate or were victims of violence under the Gloria Macapagal Arroyo administration since 2001.[28] This includes 3 priests who were reported killed just in 2007:Basilio Bautista of the Iglesia Filipina Reform Group,in Surigao del Sur,Indonesian priest Fransiskus Madhu,in Kalinga province,and Catholic priest Florante Rigonan,in Ilocos Norte.[29]
On August 17,2007,Puno said that the writ of amparo (Spanish for protection),would strip the military of the defense of denial (Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption's 9th anniversary celebration at Camp Crame). Under the writ,families of victims would have the right to access information on their cases—a constitutional right called the "habeas data" common in several Latin America countries. The final version of the rule,which was made retroactive,would come out by next month. Puno stated that "In other words,if you have this right,it would be very,very difficult for State agents,State authorities to be able to escape from their culpability."[30][31]
On September 15,2007,lawyer Neri Javier Colmenares (National Union of People's Lawyers) announced that the Supreme Court of the Philippines committee on the revision of rules drafted the writ of amparo rules,which were promulgated in October. The writ of amparo (Spanish for protection) is a defense to prevent extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances. As supplement,recourse to "habeas data," to grant the right of access information on desaparecidos,was also provided.[32]
Historical promulgation of Writ of Amparo
On September 25,2007,Chief Justice Reynato Puno officially announced the Supreme Court of the Philippines' approval or promulgation of the Writ of Amparo:"Today,the Supreme Court promulgated the rule that will place the constitutional right to life,liberty and security above violation and threats of violation. This rule will provide the victims of extralegal killings and enforced disappearances the protection they need and the promise of vindication for their rights. This rule empowers our courts to issue reliefs that may be granted through judicial orders of protection,production,inspection and other relief to safeguard one's life and liberty The writ of amparo shall hold public authorities,those who took their oath to defend the constitution and enforce our laws,to a high standard of official conduct and hold them accountable to our people. The sovereign Filipino people should be assured that if their right to life and liberty is threatened or violated,they will find vindication in our courts of justice."[33]
A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC,The Rule on Writ of Amparo
The Resolution and the Rule on the Writ of Amparo gave legal birth to Puno's brainchild.[34][35][36] No filing or legal fees are required for Amparo which took effect on October 24 in time for the 62nd anniversary of the United Nations. Puno also stated that the court would soon issue rules on the writ of habeas data and the implementing guidelines for habeas corpus. The petition for the writ of amparo may be filed "on any day and at any time" with the Regional Trial Court,or with the Sandiganbayan,the Court of Appeals,and the Supreme Court. The interim reliefs under amparo are:temporary protection order (TPO),inspection order (IO),production order (PO),and witness protection order (WPO,RA 6981).[37]
International criticism
On September 28,2007,the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) criticized the Writ of Amparo and Habeas Data (Philippines) for being insufficient:"Though it responds to practical areas it is still necessary that further action must be taken in addition to this. The legislative bodies,House of Representatives and Senate,should also initiate its own actions promptly and without delay. They must enact laws which ensure protection of rights—laws against torture and enforced disappearance and laws to afford adequate legal remedies to victims." AHRC objected since the writ failed to protect non-witnesses,even if they too face threats or risk to their lives.[38]
Year two
The Puno court held its first multisectoral meeting in 2007 to address the issue of extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances in the Philippines. Puno announced that his Court would hold the 2nd summit,dubbed as "Forum on Increasing Access to Justice:Bridging Gaps and Removing Roadblocks," which were held simultaneously in 3 venues in Luzon,the Visayas and Mindanao from June 30 to July 1,2008,via videoconferencing.[39] The "Access to Justice for the Poor Project" was implemented on June 30,2008,in 36 municipalities in the 15 poorest provinces,with the assistance of the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD),Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG),the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Alternative Law Groups Inc. The forum "Increasing Access to Justice" found that aside from poverty,exorbitant legal fees and the infrequent use of Tagalog during court hearings also affected judicial access.[40]
Justice on Wheels (JOW) project
Puno and Alfredo Lim,on July 9,2008,re-launched the Supreme Court's Justice on Wheels (JOW) Project,to improve access of justice to the poor,specifically,those who are above 70 years,and detainees whose cases had dragged for longer periods than prescribed by law. The justice-on-wheels program,borrowed from Guatemala justice system,was first launched in the Philippines on 2004 with World Bank and Asian Development Bank funds. 4 buses were converted into mobile courtrooms,to have served Manila and other regions. The Manila City Jail was built for only 1,000 inmates but was crammed with 4,602.[41][42][43]
Case Management Information System (CMIS)
The United States donated 50 computer units and other related equipment to the High Tribunal during the July 23,2008,launching of the Case Management Information System (CMIS) by Reynato Puno and Kristie Kenney,to reduce the judiciary's case backlog and congested dockets. The computers are part of the US $650,000 US Agency for International Development (Usaid) grant for the CMIS,"to develop the software,build the information structure,for technical assistance and training of the justices and court personnel (of the SC,Court of Tax Appeals,Court of Appeals and the Sandiganbayan)."[44]
Puno said:"We have our zero backlog program;we continue to review,revise and simplify the Rules of Court;we have established special courts,etc."[45] Rule of Law Effectiveness (RoLE) Project of CMIS aims "to (1) reduce delay and prevent case congestion,as well as to generally speed up the pace of litigation,(2) strengthen judicial accountability and its integrity infrastructure,(3) enhance the capacity of Justices to manage caseload more efficiently and in a more convenient manner,(4) improve access to justice and public access to relevant information on cases,and (5) improve capacities for sound oversight planning,monitoring,and evaluation of court operations and performance and support better supervision of court operations."[46]
Small Claims Court Pilot Project
On September 30,2008,Puno officially launched the Small Claims Court Pilot Project,the "Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases" (AM No. 08-8-7-SC),effective in 22 pilot courts,per A.M. No. 141-2008.[47] 70% of Metro Manila Metropolitan Trial Courts' case loads consist of small claims cases,filed by indigents. The new Rule now provides for "an inexpensive and expeditious means to settle actions before first-level courts,excluding Sharia (Arabic:شريعة Circuit Courts,for money claims not exceeding Ph P100,000.00. No attorneys are allowed and user-friendly forms are provided. Decisions are also required to be rendered on the first day of hearing. The decision in a small claims case shall be final and unappealable,except extra-ordinary appeals through certiorari." The Rule was promulgated by the Supreme Court of the Philippines pursuant to its "Increasing Access to Justice Program" with support funds from the United States Agency for International Development and the American Bar Association–Rule of Law Initiative.[48][49][50]
Puno was re-appointed to his second term as a member of the University of the Philippines Board of Regents and received sums of money until September 30,2014.[51]
Related Research Articles
The Supreme Court (Filipino:Kataas-taasang Hukuman;colloquially referred to as the Korte Suprema,is the highest court in the Philippines. The Supreme Court was established by the Second Philippine Commission on June 11,1901 through the enactment of its Act No. 136,an Act which abolished the Real Audiencia de Manila,the predecessor of the Supreme Court.
Artemio Villaseñor Panganiban Jr. is a Filipino jurist. He served as the 21st Supreme Court Chief Justice of the Philippines from 2005 to 2007.
The Hultman–Chapman murder case was a murder case that gained wide publicity in the Philippines during the early 1990s because Claudio Teehankee Jr.,the perpetrator of the crime,was the son of the late former Chief Justice Claudio Teehankee and the brother of former Justice Undersecretary Manuel Teehankee. The case helped sway the public view and lawmakers on crime and restore the death penalty in the Philippines.
Habeas data is a writ and constitutional remedy available in certain nations. The literal translation from Latin of habeas data is "[we command] you have the data," or "you [the data subject] have the data." The remedy varies from country to country,but in general,it is designed to protect,by means of an individual complaint presented to a constitutional court,the data,image,privacy,honour,information self-determination and freedom of information of a person.
Renato Tereso Antonio Coronado Corona was a Filipino judge who was the 23rd chief justice of the Philippines from 2010 to 2012. He served as an associate justice after being appointed by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo on April 9,2002,and later as Chief Justice on May 12,2010,upon the retirement of Chief Justice Reynato Puno.
Maria Alicia Austria-Martinez is a Filipino jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines from 2002 to 2009. She was appointed to the Court by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo on April 12,2002.
Arturo Dizon Brion is a former associate justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. He took his oath as a member of the Supreme Court on March 17,2008. From 2006 until his appointment to the Supreme Court,Brion served in the cabinet of President Macapagal-Arroyo as the Secretary of the Department of Labor and Employment.
Florentino Velasquez Floro Jr. is a Filipino former judge who achieved notoriety after being suspended from the Philippine judiciary in 2006 due to mental illness. Floro made several statements that he was psychic and claimed to frequently communicate with invisible duendes,a type of dwarf common in Filipino and Latin American mythology.
Teresita Leonardo-De Castro is a Filipina who served as the 24th chief justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines;she was appointed by President Rodrigo Duterte on August 28,2018. She assumed the vacated position once her predecessor,Maria Lourdes Sereno,was removed via a quo warranto petition;making De Castro the de jure 24th chief justice,and the first female chief justice of the Supreme Court.
Ruben T. Reyes was a Filipino jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines from 2007 to 2009.
In the Philippines,amparo and habeas data are prerogative writs to supplement the inefficacy of the writ of habeas corpus. Amparo means 'protection,' while habeas data is 'access to information.' Both writs were conceived to solve the extensive Philippine extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances since 1999.
Agnes Vicenta Salayo Torres-Devanadera,also known as Agnes VST Devanadera,is a Filipina lawyer and politician who is currently the president and CEO of Clark Development Corporation since her appointment by Bongbong Marcos in 2022. She previously served as the chairperson of the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) from 2017 to 2022 during the Duterte administration. During the Arroyo administration,she served as the Solicitor General of the Philippines,the first woman to hold the post. She was also the acting Secretary of Justice on two short stints.
Extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances in the Philippines are illegal executions –unlawful or felonious killings –and forced disappearances in the Philippines. These are forms of extrajudicial punishment,and include extrajudicial executions,summary executions,arbitrary arrest and detentions,and failed prosecutions due to political activities of leading political,trade union members,dissident or social figures,left-wing political parties,non-governmental organizations,political journalists,outspoken clergy,anti-mining activists,agricultural reform activists,members of organizations that are alleged as allied or legal fronts of the communist movement or claimed supporters of the NPA and its political wing,the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP). Other frequent targets are ancestral land rights defenders,Indigenous rights activists,environmentalists,and human rights workers.
In most legal systems of the Spanish-speaking world,the writ of amparo is a remedy for the protection of constitutional rights,found in certain jurisdictions. The amparo remedy or action is an effective and inexpensive instrument for the protection of individual rights.
The Judicial Executive Legislative Advisory and Consultative Council (JELACC) of the Philippines is a body created by a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed on May 13,2008,which serves as "the forum and venue for the representatives of the 3 branches of the government to undertake measures on matters affecting the primacy of the rule of law,specifically tastked to identify the problems and issues,formulate solutions,and to implement them." The historical move which was aimed "to strengthen the consultation and coordination among the three branches of government in upholding the rule of law." Jelacc was the brainchild of Kiko Pangilinan,first proposed on the July 16–17,2007 Manila Hotel Summit on Extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances in the Philippines.
The GSIS–Meralco bribery case was a landmark case heard by the Supreme Court of the Philippines. This complex case began with a complaint filed by the Philippines' Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Philippines (SEC) questioning the unvalidated proxy votes used by the Lopez family in a board election of the Manila Electric Company (Meralco). The SEC issued a cease and desist order (CDO) against Meralco,which was ignored by the latter. A show cause order (SCO) was then issued by the SEC,whereupon Meralco petitioned the Court of Appeals,questioning the jurisdiction of the SEC. The Court of Appeals issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) to the SEC while the Special 9th Division composed of Associate Justices Vicente Q. Roxas,Jose L. Sabio Jr. and Myrna Dimaranan Vidal heard the case. Roxas was assigned as the ponente while Sabio was the acting chairman.
Neri Javier Colmenares is a Filipino legislator,human rights lawyer and activist. He was an associate of the Asian Law Centre at Melbourne Law School when he was completing his Ph.D. in law on "The Writ of Amparo and the International Criminal Court." He also lectured at the University of Melbourne on International Human Rights Law and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
A Writ of Kalikasan is a legal remedy under Philippine law that provides protection of one's constitutional right to a healthy environment,as outlined in Section 16,Article II of the Philippine Constitution,which states that the "state shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature." Kalikasan is a Filipino word for "nature".
The Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG) is a nationwide organization of human rights lawyers in the Philippines. It was founded in 1974 by Sen. Jose W. Diokno,Lorenzo Tañada,J.B.L. Reyes,and Joker Arroyo during the martial law era under former President Ferdinand Marcos. It is the first and largest group of human rights lawyers established in the nation. They work on countering varied abuses against human rights and civil liberties. Its current chairman since 2003 is human rights attorney Chel Diokno,the founding dean of the De La Salle University Tañada-Diokno School of Law.
The judiciary of the Philippines consists of the Supreme Court,which is established in the Constitution,and three levels of lower courts,which are established through law by the Congress of the Philippines. The Supreme Court has expansive powers,able to overrule political and administrative decisions,and with the ability to craft rules and law without precedent. It further determines the rules of procedure for lower courts,and its members sit on electoral tribunals.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
