Siege of Tournai (1709)

Last updated
Siege of Tournai
Part of the War of the Spanish Succession
Marlborough at Tournai 1709.jpg
John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough at the Siege of Tournai, 1709 by John Wootton
Date28 June – 3 September 1709
Location
Tournai, France
50°36′20″N03°23′17″E / 50.60556°N 3.38806°E / 50.60556; 3.38806
Result Grand Alliance victory
Belligerents
Royal Standard of the King of France.svg  France
Commanders and leaders
 Marquis de Surville
Strength
~50,000 7,700
Casualties and losses
5,300 1,729 dead
1,482 wounded
Belgium relief location map.jpg
Red pog.svg
Tournai
class=notpageimage|
Location of Tournai in modern day Belgium

The siege of Tournai was a siege of the city of Tournai, then part of the Kingdom of France, between 28 June and 3 September 1709. [1] A Grand Alliance army under the British Duke of Marlborough successfully forced the surrender of the French garrison during the War of the Spanish Succession. [2]

Contents

The siege was the first significant engagement of the 1709 campaign. Marlborough intended to take the city quickly, thereby enabling an Allied advance into northern France. The garrison however, under the Marquis de Surville, held out for considerably longer than had been expected and the siege consumed much of the fighting season. It saw extensive use of mining and countermining as the Allies sought to break through strong French fortifications, particularly Tournai's citadel. [3] The British historian, David G. Chandler, described the siege as "one of the hardest fought and least pleasant of modern history". [4]

Background

At the beginning of the 1709 campaign, the Allies were eager to maintain the pressure on Louis XIV by breaking through the line of border fortresses, known as the "Pré carré", and advancing into northern France. However, the Allied commander, Marlborough, considered the positions held by the French Duke of Villars too strong for a frontal assault. [5]

The Allied leaders had now little other choice then to initiate a siege. This played into France's hands as it had an interest in slowing down the campaign. Marlborough's preferred option was attacking Ypres. The capture of this city close to the coast would be popular in England and the city was less strongly defended than Tournai. In addition, the artillery train was already near that city and its surrounding fertile regions could well sustain a large army. [6] The Dutch opposed this plan. [5] A siege of Ypres would expose Brabant to a French attack and might also allow her to control the important Scheldt river. A siege of Tournai, on the other hand, would better secure Ghent and Oudenaarde, neither of which were strong cities, and strengthen the Allied supply lines. In addition, it was known that Tournai, although a very strong city, possessed a relatively weak garrison. [6] As a result, the Allies [lower-alpha 1] agreed to make the strategic city of Tournai the main objective for 1709. [5]

Following the 1667 siege of Tournai, Louis XIV had ordered the construction of significant defences around Tournai, including a citadel, between 1667 and 1674. The director of the works was Guillaume Deshouillères, occasionally supervised by the great military engineer Vauban. [2] The work had the shape of a pentagon with five bastions connected by curtain walls, and a so-called Royal door, an emergency exit. The whole fortification was surrounded by an enclosure made up of ditches and ramparts whose glacis, facing towards the city, ended in a vast esplanade. [7]

Owing to its impressive fortifications and garrison, Tournai was one of the strongest French fortresses by 1709. Lieutenant-General Louis-Charles de Hautefort de Surville was given command of the city. The garrison consisted of 13½ battalions (9 of them regular line infantry), 5 free corps, 2 artillery companies and 2 Irish brigades, for a total of approximately 7,700 men. [8] This was, however, too few soldiers to man the city's extensive network of fortifications. Tournai had enough provisions and ammunition to sustain a siege of four months. [9]

Siege

28 June to 29 July

On 24 June 1709, the Allied force feigned an attack on Ypres and successfully forced Villars to re-manoeuvre his army. The allies then turned towards Tournai. By noon of 27 June, most of Marlborough's British and Dutch soldiers were in position outside the city. [10] Prince Eugène's force arrived at Tournai that evening and the following morning. On the night of 28 to 29 June, Prince Eugène ordered the construction of bridges over the swampy ground surrounding the city to enable communication between Allied positions on both banks of the Scheldt river. It was decided that Marlborough would conduct the siege while Eugène commanded the covering force. [4]

The Allied soldiers started to dig trenches around Tournai on 30 June. [11] The siege corps, under the chief in situ Marlborough, consisted of 60 infantry battalions and 70 cavalry squadrons. [3] [12] The Allied force was mainly made up of British, Austrian, Prussian and Dutch soldiers, with smaller numbers of Danish, Hessian and Hanoverian troops. In response to the Allied arrival outside the city, Surville had all of the water locks blocked, causing the river to accumulate in such a way that made getting between the two banks of the Scheldt nearly impossible. Nonetheless, by 4–6 July the Allied forces had surrounded the city with trenches and the garrison of Tournai was denied any communication with the outside. [9]

The Duke of Marlborough, allied commander during the siege of Tournai John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough, Captain-General of the English forces and Master-General of the Ordnance, 1702 (c), attributed to Michael Dahl 91996.jpg
The Duke of Marlborough, allied commander during the siege of Tournai

Marlborough was eager to end the siege as quickly as possible. On the night of 8 to 9 July, the Allies conducted simultaneous attacks on three sections of the fortifications. [13] The first and largest was commanded by Lieutenant-General Lottum, the second by Lieutenant-General Fagel and the third by General Schulenburg. [14] The besieging troops made it to within 200-300 paces of the counterscarp, but heavy rain delayed further work. On 10 July, elements of Lieutenant-General Bettendorf's Allied siege artillery finally reached Tournai. The French sallied out with 500 men, but the Spanish regiment in the vanguard deserted and the remainder of the force returned to the city. [9]

By 11 July, the remainder of the siege artillery had arrived at Tournai. Overall, 100 heavy guns and 60 mortars had been transported by ship from Ghent. However, due to the heavy rain, the Allied trenches were filled with water and the artillery pieces could not be put in position. [15] The shelling of Tournai finally began on 13 July and within a week the besiegers managed to drive the French out of their entrenchments in front of the citadel. On the night of 20 to 21 July, the French attempted a sortie near the Valenciennes Gate. [16] The effort was repulsed, but the French succeeded in disrupting Allied siege works. [9] The following night, a similar French sally was repulsed. [16]

On the night of 26 July, Allied troops captured the sluice and important outer-works on all three approaches. [16] [17] On 28 July, Eugène and Marlborough inspected the siege works, while a French sortie employing 200 men was repulsed. Surville held a council of war where it was decided to surrender the city and to retreat to the citadel with what was left of the garrison (approximately 4–5,000 out of 7,700 French soldiers). [17] On 29 July, Surville surrendered the city of Tournai. [13]

30 July to 3 September

A plan of the city and citadel of Tournai as besieged by the Allies in 1709 Plan de Tournai 1709.jpg
A plan of the city and citadel of Tournai as besieged by the Allies in 1709

On 30 July, Surville retired to the citadel with his remaining 4–5,000 men on the condition that, if he was not relieved by 5 September, the citadel would be handed over to the Allies. The Allies entered the city through the Lille Gate and occupied it with 10 battalions. In the meantime a temporary armistice was agreed between the parties, while Surville sent the Marquis de Ravignan to Versailles to obtain orders from Louis XIV. On the advice of Surville, the French king refused to consider the capitulation of the citadel and ordered the French garrison to continue to resist. Instead, Louis offered a ceasefire on the Flanders front. [18] This was rejected by Marlborough.

Shortly after the surrender of the city, Marlborough relocated his camp to Orchies, 19km south-west of Tournai, so that he could better monitor the movements of Villars' army. He left command of the siege to his Prussian and Dutch officers. [19] On 1 August, Prussian Lieutenant-General Lottum proceeded with the siege of the citadel. [13] The citadel was described by the British soldier John Marshall Deane as "an invincible strong place for mines". [20]

Schulenburg, one the Prussian commanders during the siege Ca' Rezzonico - Ritratto di Johann Matthias von der Schulenburg - Antonio Guardi.jpg
Schulenburg, one the Prussian commanders during the siege

On 8 August, Lieutenant-General von Schulenburg opened a second front of attack, but the coordination between Lottum and Schulenburg was poor. [17] Allied casualties were high, even in the final days of the siege. [21] Mining and countermining became a particular feature of the fight for the citadel, often involving subterranean engagements in terrible conditions. On 26 August, the French blew up a mine which killed more than 400 men. On 27 August, a French attempt to sally from the citadel was betrayed by deserters and repelled by German infantry. [9]

With food supplies running low, on 31 August, Surville offered to surrender to Marlborough, but the Allied commanders rejected his proposals. On 1 September, the Allies resumed the shelling of the citadel. In response, Surville threatened that if the garrison had to surrender as prisoners of war, he would blow up the bastions.

On 3 September, the Duke of Marlborough finally accepted Surville's conditions of surrender. [22] The siege had lasted 69 days. The French garrison, now numbering no more than 2,400 men, left the citadel with the honours of war and returned to France as part of a prisoner exchange. [23]

Aftermath

Villars was furious at the loss of Tournai and it ended his hopes that the siege would keep Marlborough occupied for the rest of the campaign season. Villars blamed Surville for the defeat, branding him an "idiot" for not ensuring the city had enough supplies. [24] He labelled the surrender of Tournai the "most shameful thing in the world". Despite the vigorous French defence resulting in over 5,000 Allied casualties, Surville quickly lost Louis XIV's confidence and he was dismissed from service. [24]

Following the surrender of Tournai, Marlborough immediately marched his forces to lay siege to Mons. [22] Having assumed Tournai would hold out until at least October and thus consume the entire 1709 campaign season, Louis now ordered Villars to prevent the loss of Mons "at all costs... the salvation of France is at stake". Churchill wrote that "the fall of Tournai was followed by an explosion of war-fury strangely out of keeping with the policy and temper in which the campaign had hitherto been conducted". [25]

The main Allied army arrived east of Mons on 7 September, awaiting the arrival of their siege artillery from Tournai. [26] Villars took up positions to the southwest on 9 September, leaving the two forces facing each other across the gap of Malplaquet. [27] The Battle of Malplaquet took place two days later, one of the most costly battles of the entire war. [28] Tournai's badly damaged defences were only partially repaired over the following decades, something which would be exploited by Maurice de Saxe during the siege of Tournai in 1745 during the War of the Austrian Succession.

Notes

  1. ↑ The Allied council of war which made the decision included Marlbourough, Eugene of Savoy, Count Tilly, the Earl of Cadogan, Daniël van Dopff and the Dutch field deputies. [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough</span> British soldier and statesman (1650–1722)

General John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough, 1st Prince of Mindelheim, 1st Count of Nellenburg, Prince of the Holy Roman Empire, was an English soldier and statesman. From a gentry family, he served first as a page at the court of the House of Stuart under James, Duke of York, through the 1670s and early 1680s, earning military and political advancement through his courage and diplomatic skill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Denain</span> 1712 battle

The Battle of Denain was fought on 24 July 1712 as part of the War of the Spanish Succession. It resulted in a French victory, under Marshal Villars, against Dutch and Austrian forces, under Prince Eugene of Savoy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Malplaquet</span> 1709 Spanish Succession War battle

The Battle of Malplaquet took place on 11 September 1709 during the War of the Spanish Succession, near Taisnières-sur-Hon in modern France, then part of the Spanish Netherlands. A French army of around 75,000 men, commanded by the Duke of Villars, engaged a Grand Alliance force of 86,000 under the Duke of Marlborough. In one of the bloodiest battles of the 18th century, the Allies won a narrow victory, but suffered heavy casualties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Namur (1695)</span> 1695 battle of the Nine Years War

The 1695 Siege of Namur or Second Siege of Namur took place during the Nine Years' War between 2 July and 4 September 1695. Its capture by the French in the 1692 and recapture by the Grand Alliance in 1695 are often viewed as the defining events of the war; the second siege is considered to be William III's most significant military success during the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Bouchain (1711)</span>

The siege of Bouchain, following the Passage of the Lines of Ne Plus Ultra, was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession, and the last major victory of John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough. Marlborough and François Nicolas Fagel broke through the French defensive lines and took Bouchain after a siege of 34 days. Its capture left Cambrai the only French-held fortress between the allied army and Paris.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Lille (1708)</span>

The siege of Lille was the salient operation of the 1708 campaign season during the War of the Spanish Succession. After an obstinate defence of 120 days, the French garrison surrendered the city and citadel of Lille, commanded by Marshal Boufflers, to the forces of the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Wijnendale</span> Battle in the war of the Spanish succession in 1708

The Battle of Wijnendale was a battle in the War of the Spanish Succession fought on 28 September 1708 near Wijnendale, Flanders, between an allied force protecting a convoy carrying ammunition for the Siege of Lille (1708) and forces of Bourbon France and Spain. It ended in a victory for the allies, leading to the taking of Lille.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">François Nicolas Fagel</span> Dutch general

François Nicolas Baron Fagel was an infantry general serving the Dutch Republic. He was a nephew of Gaspar Fagel and took part in many battles during his career. He played an important role in battles such as the Siege of Bonn, the Battle of Malplaquet and the Siege of Bouchain. He was the son of Nicolaas Fagel, mayor of Nijmegen, and Elisabeth Robbé.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhine campaign of 1713</span>

The Rhine campaign of 1713 was a successful French military campaign against the Holy Roman Empire, the sole remaining member of the once-formidable Grand Alliance which had refused to make peace with France. The campaign, which did not result in any pitched battles, ended with French forces besieging and capturing the fortified cities of Landau and Freiburg im Breisgau, which exposed the Palatinate, Württemberg and Swabia to French occupation and compelled the Emperor to sue for peace.

Having been forced to sue for peace with Sweden in 1700, the Danish army was much larger than the kingdom could support. The King decided to put almost half of the army under Allied command during the War of the Spanish Succession. Twelve thousand soldiers were in 1701 made available to the Allied powers in Flanders through a treaty with the Dutch Republic and England. The Danish corps fought under Marlborough at the battles of Blenheim, Ramillies, Oudenarde, and Malplaquet suffering heavy losses. It returned to Denmark in 1713 and 1714.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Bouchain (1712)</span>

The siege of Bouchain, was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession, and a victory for the French troops of the Duc de Villars. A French army of 20,000 men besieged and captured the Allied-controlled fortifications after an 18-day siege, with the 2,000-strong Dutch-Imperial garrison under Major-General Frederik Sirtema van Grovestins capitulating on 19 October.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Zoutleeuw</span> 1705 siege at Zoutleeuw during the War of the Spanish Succession

The siege of Zoutleeuw or the siege of Léau was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession. Allied troops with 16 artillery pieces under the command of the English Captain general the Duke of Marlborough, besieged and captured the small French-held Flemish fortified town of Zoutleeuw in the Spanish Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Haguenau (1705)</span> Conflict in War of the Spanish Succession

The siege of Haguenau was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession. An Imperial army under the command of Field Marshal Johann Karl von Thüngen, besieged and captured the French fortified city of Haguenau on the banks of the Rhine river in Alsace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Claude Frédéric t'Serclaes, Count of Tilly</span> Dutch General

Claude Frederic t'Serclaes, Count of Tilly, was a soldier and later general in the Dutch States Army. In the Dutch army he took part in the Franco-Dutch War, Nine Years' War and the War of the Spanish Succession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assault on Nijmegen (1702)</span> 1702 battle of the War of the Spanish Succession

The assault on Nijmegen occurred during the War of the Spanish Succession, on 10 and 11 June 1702 involving French troops under the Duc de Boufflers against the small garrison and some citizens of the city of Nijmegen and an Anglo-Dutch army under the Earl of Athlone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bombardment of Arras</span> 1712 bombardment of the War of the Spanish Succession

The Bombardment of Arras took place during the War of the Spanish Succession on 2 and 3 March 1712. An Allied army under Arnold van Keppel, Earl of Albemarle closed in on Arras with the aim of destroying the supplies held there. In this way, they hoped that the French would not be able to prevent the sieges of Arras and Cambrai. Although the action succeeded, the advantage had to go entirely unused because the Emperor's troops arrived too late to the Allied army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Tournai (1745)</span> Siege during the War of the Austrian Succession

The siege of Tournai was a two-month siege of the city and citadel of Tournai, then part of the Austrian Netherlands, in 1745 during the War of the Austrian Succession. The allied Pragmatic Army's attempt to relieve the siege resulted in the decisive French victory at the Battle of Fontenoy on 11 May. The largely Dutch garrison of the city subsequently surrendered to French forces on 22 May, while the garrison of the citadel surrendered on 19 June 1745. It was one of the longest sieges of the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Mons (1709)</span> Siege during the War of the Spanish Succession

The siege of Mons took place between 19 September and 23 October 1709 during the War of the Spanish Succession. It saw a Franco-Spanish garrison in the fortified town of Mons, then in the Spanish Netherlands, besieged by a force of the Duke of Marlborough's Grand Alliance army under the command of the Prince of Orange.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniël van Dopff</span>

Daniël Wolf baron van Dopff was a prominent soldier in the Dutch Republic. He was, among other things, general of the cavalry of the Dutch States Army in the War of the Spanish Succession, Quartermaster general of that army, and later commander and governor of the fortress of Maastricht.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Douai (1710)</span>

The Siege of Douai, which lasted from 22 April 1710 until the capitulation of the garrison under lieutenant-general François Zénobe Philippe Albergotti on 25 June 1710 was part of the Allied Campaign of 1710 in the War of the Spanish Succession. The siege was conducted under the joint command of the Princ of Orange and Leopold I, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau and successfully concluded despite the fact that halfway through the French army under marshal Claude Louis Hector de Villars, 1st Duke of Villars made an attempt to relieve the fortress city, which led to an indecisive stand-off for four days with the Allied Army under John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Savoy. After Douai the Allies went on to besiege Béthune.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Atkinson 1934, p. 203.
  2. 1 2 National Army Museum.
  3. 1 2 Atkinson 1946, p. 84.
  4. 1 2 Chandler 1989, p. 249.
  5. 1 2 3 Holmes 2008, pp. 417–418.
  6. 1 2 3 Wijn 1959, p. 479.
  7. ↑ Ville de Tournai.
  8. ↑ Hattendorf 2012, p. 139.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 The history of the campaign in Flanders, 1709.
  10. ↑ MacDowall 2020, p. 36.
  11. ↑ Deane 1984, p. 81.
  12. ↑ Churchill 1938, pp. 113–114.
  13. 1 2 3 George III's Military Map Collection.
  14. ↑ Wijn 1959, p. 491.
  15. ↑ Atkinson 1934, p. 198.
  16. 1 2 3 Deane 1984, p. 83.
  17. 1 2 3 MacDowall 2020, p. 37.
  18. ↑ Churchill 1938, p. 119.
  19. ↑ Deane 1984, p. 85.
  20. ↑ Deane 1984, p. 84.
  21. ↑ Deane 1984, p. 87.
  22. 1 2 Holmes 2008, p. 422.
  23. ↑ Snyder 1975, p. 1351.
  24. 1 2 MacDowall 2020, p. 38.
  25. ↑ Churchill 1938, p. 127.
  26. ↑ Atkinson 1946, p. 85.
  27. ↑ Holmes 2008, p. 423.
  28. ↑ MacDowall 2020, p. 5.

Sources

  • Atkinson, C.T. (1934). "Marlborough's Sieges". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 13 (52): 195–205. JSTOR   44226096 . Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  • Atkinson, C.T. (1946). "Marlborough's Sieges: Further Evidence". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 24 (98): 83–87. JSTOR   44220043 . Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  • Chandler, D.G. (1989). Marlborough as Military Commander. The commanders. Spellmount. ISBN   978-0-946771-12-7.
  • Churchill, Winston S. (1938). Marlborough: His Life and Times, Volume IV. London: George G. Harrap & Co., Ltd.
  • Deane, John Marshall (1984). A Journal of Marlborough's Campaigns during the War of the Spanish Succession, 1704-1711. Society for Army Historical Research.
  • Holmes, Richard (2008). Marlborough: England's Fragile Genius. Harper. ISBN   978-0-00-722572-9.
  • "Siege of Tournai, 1709". George III's Military Map Collection. Royal Collection Trust. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  • Hattendorf, John B. (2012). Marlborough: Soldier and Diplomat. Rotterdam: Karwansaray BV.
  • MacDowall, Simon (2020). Malplaquet 1709: Marlborough's Bloodiest Battle. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN   9781472841216.
  • "John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough at the Siege of Tournai, 1709". National Army Museum. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  • Snyder, Henry L. (1975). The Marlborough-Godolphin Correspondence, Volume III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • The history of the campaign in Flanders, 1709. London. 1710.
  • "Citadelle de Tournai". Ville de Tournai. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  • Wijn, J.W. (1959). Het Staatsche Leger: Deel VIII-2 Het tijdperk van de Spaanse Successieoorlog 1706–1710 (The Dutch States Army: Part VIII-2 The era of the War of the Spanish Succession 1706–1710) (in Dutch). Martinus Nijhoff.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.