Special Provisions

Last updated

The Special Provisions were a series of articles introduced in the Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation. Adopted during the Kulturkampf at the end of the 19th century, they were mainly intended to limit the influence of the Roman Catholic Church to the benefit of the Protestant radicalism then practiced by the majority of the population and cantons, but also took aim at Judaism. The articles unilaterally restricted freedom of faith and conscience by explicitly denying certain rights to certain religions.

Contents

Most articles were repelled during the second half of the 20th century via popular vote (1973, 2001) and the new Federal Constitution of 1999.

Background

The Special Provisions had their origins in the cultural struggle of the 19th century. At that time, liberal forces were fighting with the Catholic-conservative forces over state power. This initially led to the Sonderbund War, which resulted in the first Swiss Federal Constitution of 1848. The Consistution contained an article banning the Jesuits and their "affiliated societies" from all activities in the State and church. [1]

This Kulturkampf did not end in 1848, however, but broke out again in the 1870s when the Federal Council and the Church fought over the division of the Swiss dioceses and the Catholic Church's claims to power.

The Society of Jesus had already been banned in Germany in 1872 (Jesuit Law), as well as in various other European countries. The Constitution introduced four new provisions with broader dispositions against religious orders.

The Federal Constitution of 1874

The second Swiss Federal Constitution, which was introduced by referendum in 1874, granted religious freedom to a greater extent for the first time. It also included, however, several articles that were culturally militant, i.e. directed against the Catholic Church. The supporters of these articles saw them as measures to protect religious peace, while the majority of Swiss Catholics saw them as discrimination. [1]

Article 50

Article 50, introduced in 1874, was a direct consequence of the preceding conflict between the Swiss Federal Council and the Pope and several influential clergymen. Paragraph 4 prohibited the establishment of dioceses on the territory of the Swiss Confederation without the express approval of the Federal Government. [2]

The free exercise of acts of worship is guaranteed within the bounds of morality and public order.

The cantons and the Confederation reserve the right to take appropriate measures to maintain order and public peace among the members of the various religious communities and to prevent encroachments by ecclesiastical authorities on the rights of citizens and the state.

Disputes arising from public or private law concerning the formation or separation of religious communities may be submitted to the decision of the competent federal authorities by way of appeal.

The establishment of dioceses on Swiss territory is subject to the approval of the Confederation

In 1964, National Councillor Alfred Ackermann submitted a motion calling for the article on bishoprics to be deleted, but to no avail. [3] The provision was also included in the new Federal Constitution in 1999 as Article 72 paragraph 3, against the opposition of the Catholic Church. It was only in the referendum of June 10, 2001 (approved by 64 percent of the population and all cantons [4] ) that the paragraph was deleted without replacement as the last of the remaining Special Provisions.

Articles 51 and 52

Articles 51 specifically prohibited the presence of the Society of Jesus on the territory of the Confederation, going further than the 1848 provisions that merely prevented Jesuits from holding State or Church charges. Article 52 prohibited the establishment or re-establishment of monasteries in general. These two provisions were also referred to as the Jesuit Articles. [5]

The Jesuit Order and its affiliated societies shall not be admitted to any part of Switzerland, and their members shall be prohibited from any activity in the church or schools. This prohibition may also be extended by federal decree to other religious orders whose activity is dangerous to the State or disturbs the peace of the denominations.

Article 51

The establishment of new and the restoration of dissolved monasteries or religious orders is not permitted.

Article 52

As early as 1919, the Catholic-conservative National Councillor Jean-Marie Musy had demanded the repeal of these articles. This was delayed until 1947 and finally written off. After 1950, however, a rethink began, with non-Catholic constitutional lawyers such as Werner Kägi and François Aubert now also judging the articles to be "untenable" and "discriminatory". In practice, the articles were also interpreted more and more liberally, so that priories, for example, were tolerated.

Ludwig von Moos submitted a motion in 1954 calling for these two articles to be deleted without replacement. [6] In the referendum of May 20, 1973, the federal decree on the repeal of the Jesuit and monastery articles of the Federal Constitution was adopted, thereby removing these articles from the constitution. 54.9 percent of voters were in favor of repeal, 45.1 percent against. The majority of the cantons was achieved with 16 1/2 in favor and 5 1/2 against. [4]

Article 75

This article excluded that clergymen from all churches, including the Reformed Church, were excluded from election to the National Council.

Any Swiss citizen of secular standing who is entitled to vote is eligible to vote as a member of the National Council.

Article 75

As Article 96 stipulated that only those who have the right to stand for election to the National Council were eligible for election to the Federal Council, no clergyman could be elected to the national government. Election to the Council of States was possible in principle, as the right to vote for the Council of States is a matter for the respective cantons.

Article 75 was no longer included in the 1999 revision of the Federal Constitution and was tacitly abolished.

Article 25 bis

The article was passed by popular vote in 1893 and, although presented as an animal protection measure by its initiators, the campaign leading up to the vote reflected the anti-Semitism of the time.

it is expressly forbidden to bleed slaughter animals without first stunning them; this provision applies to all methods of slaughter and to all types of livestock.

Article 25 bis

In this case, the government actually opposed this initiative on the grounds that it restricted the freedom of conscience and worship of Jews. Blamed for the economic crisis of 1873, Jews were increasingly used as scapegoats in Europe. The arguments used in the 1893 campaign had strong antisemitic components, and were louder in the German-speaking part of the country (Saxony had banned ritual slaughter in 1892): the majority was clearest in Aargau (90.1 percent in support) or Zurich (85.9%), while in French-speaking Switzerland and Ticino, where anti-Semitism and animal protection were less resonant, the initiative was clearly rejected (3.1% in Valais, 12.2% in Ticino). [7]

The article was removed from the Constitution during the 1973 referendum, to be replaced by a dedicated law on animal welfare. [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popular initiative</span> Popular voter petition systems

A popular initiative is a form of direct democracy by which a petition meeting certain hurdles can force a legal procedure on a proposition. The hurdles the petition has to meet vary between countries, typically signatures by a certain number of registered voters. In direct initiative, the proposition is put directly to a plebiscite or referendum, also called a Popular initiated Referendum or citizen-initiated referendum. In an indirect initiative, the proposed measure is first referred to the legislature, and then if the proposed law is rejected by the legislature, the government may be forced to put the proposition to a referendum. The proposition may be on federal level law, statute, constitutional amendment, charter amendment, local ordinance, obligate the executive or legislature to consider the subject by submitting it to the order of the day. In contrast, a popular referendum that allows voters only to repeal existing legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canton of Schwyz</span> Canton of Switzerland

The canton of Schwyz is a canton in central Switzerland between the Alps in the south, Lake Lucerne to the west and Lake Zürich in the north, centred on and named after the town of Schwyz.

A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization or other type of entity. Amendments are often interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, directly altering the text. Conversely, they can be appended to the constitution as supplemental additions, thus changing the frame of government without altering the existing text of the document.

An entrenched clause or entrenchment clause of a constitution is a provision that makes certain amendments either more difficult or impossible to pass. Overriding an entrenched clause may require a supermajority, a referendum, or the consent of the minority party. The term eternity clause is used in a similar manner in the constitutions of Brazil, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, India, Iran, Italy, Morocco, Norway, and Turkey, but specifically applies to an entrenched clause that can never be overridden. However, if a constitution provides for a mechanism of its own abolition or replacement, like the German Basic Law does in Article 146, this by necessity provides a "back door" for getting rid of the "eternity clause", too.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blaine Amendment</span> Failed amendment to the United States Constitution

The Blaine Amendment was a failed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would have prohibited direct government aid to educational institutions that have a religious affiliation. Most state constitutions already had such provisions, and thirty-eight of the fifty states have clauses that prohibit taxpayer funding of religious entities in their state constitutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Switzerland as a federal state</span> Aspect of modern Swiss history

The rise of Switzerland as a federal state began on 12 September 1848, with the creation of a federal constitution in response to a 27-day civil war, the Sonderbundskrieg. The constitution, which was heavily influenced by the United States Constitution and the ideas of the French Revolution, was modified several times during the following decades and wholly replaced in 1999. The 1848 constitution represented the first time, other than when the short-lived Helvetic Republic had been imposed, that the Swiss had a central government instead of being simply a collection of autonomous cantons bound by treaties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern history of Switzerland</span> History of Switzerland since 1848

This article deals with the history of Switzerland since 1848.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swiss Federal Constitution</span> Constitution of the Swiss Confederation

The Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation of 18 April 1999 is the third and current federal constitution of Switzerland. It establishes the Swiss Confederation as a federal republic of 26 cantons (states). The document contains a catalogue of individual and popular rights, delineates the responsibilities of the cantons and the Confederation and establishes the federal authorities of government.

Voting in Switzerland is the process by which Swiss citizens make decisions about governance and elect officials. The history of voting rights in Switzerland mirrors the complexity of the nation itself. The polling stations are opened on Saturdays and Sunday mornings but most people vote by post in advance. At noon on Sunday, voting ends and the results are usually known during the afternoon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Restoration and Regeneration in Switzerland</span> Aspect of history

The periods of Restoration and Regeneration in Swiss history lasted from 1814 to 1847. "Restoration" is the period of 1814 to 1830, the restoration of the Ancien Régime (federalism), reverting the changes imposed by Napoleon Bonaparte on the centralist Helvetic Republic from 1798 and the partial reversion to the old system with the Act of Mediation of 1803. "Regeneration" is the period of 1830 to 1848, when in the wake of the July Revolution the "restored" Ancien Régime was countered by the liberal movement. In the Protestant cantons, the rural population enforced liberal cantonal constitutions, partly in armed marches on the cities. This resulted in a conservative backlash in the Catholic cantons in the 1830s, raising the conflict to the point of civil war by 1847.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Switzerland</span> Overview of the observance of human rights in Switzerland

Human rights are largely respected in Switzerland, one of Europe's oldest democracies. Switzerland is often at or near the top in international rankings of civil liberties and political rights observance. Switzerland places human rights at the core of the nation's value system, as represented in its Federal Constitution. As described in its FDFA's Foreign Policy Strategy 2016-2019, the promotion of peace, mutual respect, equality and non-discrimination are central to the country's foreign relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Religion in Switzerland</span>

Religion in Switzerland is predominantly Christianity. According to the national survey of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office, in 2020, Christians accounted for 61.2% of the resident population, of whom 33.8% were Catholics, 21.8% were Swiss Protestants, and 5.6% were followers of other Christian denominations. The proportion of Christians has declined significantly since 1980, when they constituted about 94% of the population; during the same timespan, unaffiliated Swiss residents have grown from about 4% to 31% of the population, and people professing non-Christian religions have grown from about 1% to 7% of the population. In 2020, according to church registers, 35.2% of the resident population were registered members of the country's Catholic Church, while 23.3% were registered members of the Protestant Church of Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Swiss minaret referendum</span> Successful popular initiative in Switzerland

The federal popular initiative "against the construction of minarets" was a successful popular initiative in Switzerland to prevent the construction of minarets on mosques. In a November 2009 referendum, a constitutional amendment banning the construction of new minarets was approved by 57.5% of the participating voters. Only three of the twenty Swiss cantons and one half canton, mostly in the French-speaking part of Switzerland, opposed the initiative.

Taxes in Switzerland are levied by the Swiss Confederation, the cantons and the municipalities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Liberia</span> Supreme law of the Republic of Liberia

The Constitution of Liberia is the supreme law of the Republic of Liberia. The current constitution, which came into force on 6 January 1986, replaced the Liberian Constitution of 1847, which had been in force since the independence of Liberia. Much like the 1847 Constitution, the Constitution creates a system of government heavily modeled on the Federal Government of the United States.

Women in Switzerland gained the right to vote in federal elections after a referendum in February 1971. The first federal vote in which women were able to participate was the 31 October 1971 election of the Federal Assembly. However it was not until a 1990 decision by the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland that women gained full voting rights in the final Swiss canton of Appenzell Innerrhoden.

Five referendums were held in Switzerland during 1931. The first was held on 8 February on a federal resolution on a petition for a referendum on article 12 of the constitution concerning bans on religious orders, and was approved by a majority of voters and cantons. The second and third were held on 15 March on revising article 72 of the constitution concerning the election of the National Council and on revising article 76, 96 and 105 on the legislative term. Both were approved. The fourth and fifth were held on 6 December on a federal law on aged and bereavement insurance and a federal law on tobacco taxation. Both were rejected.

Eleven national referendums were held in Switzerland during 2013. Voters approved six proposals related to spatial planning, executive pay, family policy, amendments to the laws on asylum and epidemics and an increase in the length of petrol station shop opening hours. The other five proposals on directly electing the Federal Council, abolishing compulsory military service, limiting salaries in a company to 12 times the lowest paid worker, tax credits for stay-at-home parents and an increase in road tax were rejected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 93 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada relating to education. It gives the provinces a broad legislative jurisdiction over education. Section 93 also contains guarantees of publicly funded denominational and separate schools for Catholic or Protestant minorities in some provinces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jesuit clause</span> Clause of the Constitution of Norway from 1814 to 1956

The Jesuit clause was a provision in the Constitution of Norway, paragraph 2, in force from 1814 to 1956, that denied Jesuits entry into the country. Until 1897, this provision was combined with a ban on monastic orders, and until 1851 a ban on Jews, the so-called Jew clause.

References

  1. 1 2 Jorio, Marco (28 July 2008). "Articles d'exception". Historical Dictionary of Switzerland .
  2. "Konfessionelle Ausnahmeartikel der Schweizerischen Bundesverfassung von 1874". quellen.geschichte-schweiz.ch. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
  3. "Pour l'abrogation d'une disposition confessionnelle". www.letempsarchives.ch. Journal de Genève. 29 September 1964. p. 2. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
  4. 1 2 Nohlen, Dieter; Stöver, Philip, eds. (2010). Elections in Europe: a data handbook (1st ed.). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verl.-Ges. ISBN   978-3-8329-5609-7.
  5. Guggisberg, Kurt (1956). Der Jesuitenartikel. Warum erhielt Art. 51 in der heute nocht geltenden 74er Verfassung eine verschärfte Form?. Zollikon-Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag.
  6. Reverdin, Olivier (24 June 1955). "Vers l'abrogation des articles confessionnels?". www.letempsarchives.ch. Journal de Genève . Retrieved 2023-12-20.
  7. Külling, Friedrich (11 January 2012). "Abattage rituel". Historical Dictionary of Switzerland .
  8. Lüthi, Ruth (18 December 2015). "Protection des animaux". Historical Dictionary of Switzerland .