The Society I Live in Is Mine

Last updated

The Society I Live in Is Mine
The Society I Live in Is Mine hardcover cover.jpg
Author Paul Goodman
Subject Social commentary
Publisher Horizon Press
Publication date
April 4, 1963 (April 4, 1963)
Pages180
OCLC 419522

The Society I Live in Is Mine is a 1963 book of Paul Goodman's social commentary ephemera. In letters to the editor, essays, speeches, reviews, and other clippings, Goodman addresses the general public on a range of civic problems, both to influence their thinking and to model the type of alert and intervening citizen he believes is necessary for societal change. His proposals span from urban renewal to school administration, with a particular focus on education and youth, and reflect his community anarchist position in wanting to spur individual initiative, oppose supreme power, and experiment with social alternatives.

Contents

Goodman wrote to a variety of officials and New York publications and includes his commentary on these letters, such as whether they were printed. He also includes a number of book reviews and reprinted essays from Dissent and Liberation magazines. Horizon Press published the book. Critics were heartened by Goodman's approach to civics but differed on whether Goodman's method was egotistical or entertaining.

Contents and themes

"The society in which I live is mine, open to my voice and action, or I do not live there at all. The government, the school board, the church, the university, the world of publishing and communications, are my agencies as a citizen. To the extent that they are not my agencies, at least open to my voice and action, I am entirely in revolutionary opposition to them and I think they should be wiped off the slate."

Paul Goodman [1] [2]

The Society I Live in Is Mine is a collection of social commentary ephemera by Paul Goodman, including letters to the editor, essays, and speeches both published and unpublished in newspapers and magazines. Much of the content is written to address the general public [3] with the intent to urge others to become more alert and intervening citizens by his own example. [4] Goodman describes the collection as "angry letters on public morals and politics" [5] written to "influence the general consensus". [4] He is appalled by how few people self-regard as citizens and instead view society as machinery of authorities in which they participate. Goodman intends to prove that by becoming heard, people can more fully participate in and enjoy their society. [6] A multitude of authentic, concerned citizens is Goodman's panacea for a society dulled by standardization, neglect, and injustice. [1]

The book includes many letters to publications and public officials, and some speeches and reviews. [4] Goodman considered "occasional letters" such as these to be the sharpest articulation of an author's style and thought. [2] He wrote to a range of New York publications including public newspapers, alt weeklies, academic faculty and student publications, and counter-cultural periodicals. [7] His public letters tend towards larger societal problems: to a university on advertising, to the New York State Commissioner of Education on good teachers blamed for the bad decisions of administrators, and to the United Nations Secretary General on citizen demonstrations. [6] His proposals are not always pleasing; the text contains notes disclosing where his recipients did not print or acknowledge his letters. [6] The book includes commentary on the general effect of the letters. [4] Where his letters went unpublished, Goodman blames the editor's judgment or courage. [2]

His reviews include republications of commentary on books by James Baldwin ( Another Country ), [9] James B. Conant (Slums and Suburbs), Benjamin Spock (Problems of Parents), Maurice R. Stein (The Eclipse of Community), Vincent Riccio and Bill Slocum (All the Way Down: The Violent Underworld of Street Gangs), and Robert Penn Warren (Segregation: The Inner Conflict in the South). [10] Goodman's reprinted essays from Dissent and Liberation include "Reflections on Literature as a Minor Art", "A Tour of South Africa", and "Format and Anxiety". [11]

The range of topics covered in his correspondence has no strict categorization [6] but reflects the range of civic problems that interest him. [6] Goodman's general position is that of a "community anarchist": He believes in reducing supreme power (sovereignty), increasing individual initiative, and experimenting in topics such as education and disarmament. [4] Though he writes mostly from a liberal perspective, Goodman makes some arch-conservative points in the name of diminishing sovereignty, [6] notably his position against nation-states and for "personal liberty and local initiative". [2] As one reviewer put it, the collection's only unifying theme is "the mind of Paul Goodman", reflecting his positions as an anarchist and pacifist, and his advocacy for sexual freedom, libertarian education, and face-to-face communication in small communities. His range of positions include: abolishing suburbs, [2] abolishing advertising, [12] rallying civil disobedience and peace marches in response to war, [2] dividing cities into village neighborhoods, offering informal apprenticeships for adolescents, encouraging sex, [12] reducing school administration, and experimenting with small classes and amateur teachers. [13] [15]

He focuses particularly on education [5] and what he calls "the waste of the young". [16] Goodman advocates for greater teacher and student liberties despite his era's opposition to progressive schooling. [5] He argues against school standardization as a path to student achievement and believes that American society will become wiser and more capable of distributing authority to explore personal initiative and make mistakes. In this way, he argues against minimizing dropouts in institutions like schools and would rather provide them with another way to live decently. [16] Goodman argues against literacy, which he sees as having "no practical importance" in societal decision-making, used mainly to advertise and campaign to individuals. [5]

Publication

The author, around the time of publication Paul Goodman, 1964.jpg
The author, around the time of publication

Horizon Press published the book in hardcover on April 4, 1963. [17] The press was known for publishing early books by unknown authors and unknown books by familiar authors. [18] Horizon had published Goodman's earlier short story collection Our Visit to Niagara (1960) and would also publish his Compulsory Mis-education the next year (1964). [19] By the time of the book's publication, Goodman's social criticism already had a considerable following among American youth. [4]

Reception and legacy

Reviewers commented on Goodman's role as a social gadfly: "strident, denunciatory, sometimes simplistic" [5] but "always earnest" [12] and fitting into no neat pigeonhole. [5] Raymond Price Jr. and August Derleth were heartened by Goodman’s articulate opinions, approach to civics as a “right and responsibility” to act in one’s own society, [2] and willingness to take part in the affairs of others. [1] Goodman's appeal for more public letterwriting made more sense for Goodman himself, wrote the Santa Maria Times , than for the general public lacking his panache. [6] Critics differed on whether Goodman’s chiding approach was benevolent: While Nat Hentoff found this technique stimulating, [16] it appeared to The San Francisco Examiner as crankiness [5] and to Price as intellectual vanity. [2] Price called the book an "exercise in ego fulfillment" in which Goodman postures extravagantly, dismisses his detractors, and stifles debate, wearing down the reader. [2] Hentoff, however, felt that Goodman’s hectoring insistence is what made him one of American society’s most thoroughly independent minds. [16]

Thinkers like Goodman who break out of traditional patterns of thought, wrote the Washington Evening Star , are "destined to perpetrate one outrage after another". [20] The critic found Goodman's positions to be sensible yet extreme, such that he could appreciate the proposals but struggled to agree fully. [20] Goodman's solutions, to Hentoff, were debatable or impossible, requiring "a prior social revolution that he does not know how to instigate". [16]

As a book of ephemera, Price considered the book to be unfocused and did not think Goodman's old letters needed republication. The reviewer figured that The Society I Live in Is Mine appealed best to those already endeared to Goodman's style. [2] The Santa Maria Times similarly did not think Goodman’s letters would pass the test of time, like those of Thomas Babington Macaulay or Benjamin Franklin, though Goodman's book of letters to editors was itself a rare concept and interesting experiment. [6] For Hentoff, the book was most valuable for its distillation of Goodman's central ideas, but it also appealed as entertainment, to witness Goodman's "indignant, sardonic, and often devastatingly accurate assaults", [4] for example, his commentary on cultural absurdities like a preschool television program lacking the spontaneity of childhood, or a school of science running a shelter drill that provided no actual shelter to children in event of a bombing. [16] The New Yorker agreed that Goodman was funnier than he realized. [12] Goodman is readable, said Hentoff, because all his years of fervent opposition have not turned him "chronically self-righteous or humorless". [16]

Related Research Articles

<i>Compulsory Miseducation</i> 1964 book by Paul Goodman

Compulsory Miseducation is a critique of American public schools written by Paul Goodman and published by Horizon Press in 1964. Already established as a social critic of American society and the role of its youth in his previous book Growing Up Absurd (1960), Goodman argues in Compulsory Miseducation against the necessity of schools for the socialization of youth and recommends their abolition. He suggests that formal education lasts too long, teaches the wrong social class values, and increasingly damages students over time. Goodman writes that the school reflects the misguided and insincere values of its society and thus school reformers should focus on these values before schools. He proposes a variety of alternatives to school including no school, the city or farm as school, apprenticeships, guided travel, and youth organizations. Reviewers complimented Goodman's style and noted his deliberate contrarianism, but were split on the feasibility of his proposals. Goodman's book was a precursor to the work of deschooling advocate Ivan Illich.

<i>Growing Up Absurd</i> 1960 book by Paul Goodman

Growing Up Absurd is a 1960 book by Paul Goodman on the relationship between American juvenile delinquency and societal opportunities to fulfill natural needs. Contrary to the then-popular view that juvenile delinquents should be led to respect societal norms, Goodman argued that young American men were justified in their disaffection because their society lacked the preconditions for growing up, such as meaningful work, honorable community, sexual freedom, and spiritual sustenance.

<i>Communitas</i> (book) 1947 book by Percival and Paul Goodman

Communitas: Means of Livelihood and Ways of Life is a 1947 book on community and city planning by Percival and Paul Goodman. Presented as an illustrated primer on how city planning affects socioeconomic order and citizens' empowerment to better their communities, the book reviews historical and modern approaches to urban planning before proposing three of the Goodmans' own provocative community paradigms.

<i>The Community of Scholars</i> 1962 book about higher education by Paul Goodman

The Community of Scholars is a 1962 book about higher education by Paul Goodman with his observations on its function and proposals for its future.

<i>New Reformation</i> 1970 book by Paul Goodman

New Reformation: Notes of a Neolithic Conservative is a 1970 book of social commentary by Paul Goodman best known as his apologia pro vita sua before his death two years later.

<i>Kafkas Prayer</i> 1947 book by Paul Goodman

Kafka's Prayer is a 1947 book-length analysis of the novelist Franz Kafka and his works by Paul Goodman. Using Freudian and Reichian psychoanalysis, Goodman assesses the philosophical and religious significance of Kafka's aphoristic statements and three novels. He levels an anarchist societal critique against social institutions borne from neuroticism. Goodman used the book, published by Vanguard Press, to grapple with the religious implications of psychoanalysis and transition from a career writing on Jewish concerns to a period that would culminate in his collaboration on the founding work of the gestalt therapy movement.

<i>The May Pamphlet</i> 1945 anarchist essays by Paul Goodman

The May Pamphlet is a collection of six anarchist essays written and published by Paul Goodman in 1945. Goodman discusses the problems of living in a society that represses individual instinct through coercion. He suggests that individuals resist such conditions by reclaiming their natural instincts and initiative, and by "drawing the line", an ideological delineation beyond which an individual should refuse to conform or cooperate with social convention. While themes from The May Pamphlet—decentralization, peace, social psychology, youth liberation—would recur throughout his works, Goodman's later social criticism focused on practical applications rather than theoretical concerns.

<i>People or Personnel</i>

People or Personnel is a critique of centralized power written by Paul Goodman and published by Random House in 1965.

<i>Speaking and Language</i> 1972 book by Paul Goodman

Speaking and Language: Defence of Poetry is a book of criticism by Paul Goodman that blames academic, structured approaches to linguistics for diminishing the role of creativity and spontaneity in speaking and human nature.

<i>Little Prayers and Finite Experience</i> Book by Paul Goodman

Little Prayers and Finite Experience is a book of prose and poetry by Paul Goodman.

<i>Making Do</i> 1963 novel by Paul Goodman

Making Do is a 1963 novel written by Paul Goodman and published by Macmillan.

<i>The Structure of Literature</i> 1954 book by Paul Goodman

The Structure of Literature is a 1954 book of literary criticism by Paul Goodman. The published version of Goodman's doctoral dissertation in the humanities, the book proposes a mode of formal literary analysis that digests a literary work into structural elements based on the reader's experience and recombines those parts to explain the work as a whole. The book analyzes several literary works as examples with close analysis and genre discussion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poetry of Paul Goodman</span> Poetry of Paul Goodman

Paul Goodman described himself as a man of letters but foremost a poet. He published several poetry collections in his life, including The Lordly Hudson (1962), Hawkweed (1967), North Percy (1968), and Homespun of Oatmeal Gray (1970). His Collected Poems (1973) were published posthumously.

Taylor Stoehr (1931–2013) was an American professor and author. He edited several volumes of Paul Goodman's work as his literary executor.

This is a list of works by Murray Bookchin (1921–2006). For a more complete list, please see the Bookchin bibliography compiled by Janet Biehl.

<i>The Lordly Hudson</i> Poem and 1962 poetry collection by Paul Goodman

The Lordly Hudson is a poem and 1962 book of collected poetry by Paul Goodman.

"The Politics of Being Queer" is a 1969 essay by Paul Goodman on the connection between his bisexuality and his personal politics. It is noteworthy for its role in reclaiming the word "queer". Originally published as "Memoirs of an Ancient Activist", Goodman revised the essay, which was retitled and published posthumously.

Parents' Day is a 1951 novel by Paul Goodman. Written as autobiographical fiction based on the author's experiences teaching at the upstate New York progressive boarding school Manumit during the 1943–1944 year, the book's narrator grapples with his homosexuality and explores a series of sexual attractions and relationships that culminates in his being fired by the school. Goodman wrote the novel as part of a Reichian self-analysis begun in 1946 to better understand his own life. He struggled to find a publisher and ultimately self-published through a friend's small press. Reviewers remarked on unease in Goodman's sexual revelations, lack of self-awareness, and lack of coherence in the text. Parents' Day sold poorly and has been largely forgotten, save for some recognition as an early gay American novel.

Prior to his career in social criticism, the American writer Paul Goodman had a prolific career in avant-garde literature, including some 16 works for the stage. His plays, mostly written in the 1940s, were typically experimental. Their professional productions were either unsuccessful or flopped, including the three productions staged with The Living Theatre in the 1950s and one with The American Place Theatre in 1966. His lack of recognition as a litterateur in the 1950s helped drive him to his successful career in social criticism in the 1960s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Goodman</span> American writer and public intellectual (1911–1972)

Paul Goodman was an American writer and public intellectual best known for his 1960s works of social criticism. Goodman was prolific across numerous literary genres and non-fiction topics, including the arts, civil rights, decentralization, democracy, education, media, politics, psychology, technology, urban planning, and war. As a humanist and self-styled man of letters, his works often addressed a common theme of the individual citizen's duties in the larger society, and the responsibility to exercise autonomy, act creatively, and realize one's own human nature.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Derleth 1963.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Price 1963.
  3. ↑ Price 1963; The New Yorker 1963.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hentoff 1963, p. 54.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Stanley 1963.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hogan 1963.
  7. ↑ Nicely 1979, pp. 75–84.
  8. ↑ Pearre 1963.
  9. ↑ The Nashville Banner described Goodman's Baldwin review as "famous". [8]
  10. ↑ Nicely 1979, pp. 61, 70, 79, 82, 83.
  11. ↑ Nicely 1979, pp. 64, 77, 82.
  12. 1 2 3 4 The New Yorker 1963.
  13. ↑ Widmer 1980, p. 83.
  14. ↑ Widmer 1980, p. 163.
  15. ↑ These positions recur in his proposals as a member of Manhattan local school boards in the early 1960s. [14] [4]
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Hentoff 1963, p. 55.
  17. ↑ Nicely 1979, p. 87.
  18. ↑ Johnston, David Cay (April 23, 1997). "Ben Raeburn, 86, Publisher of the Known and the Aspiring". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 25, 2023. Retrieved February 25, 2023.
  19. ↑ Nicely 1979, pp. 73, 96.
  20. 1 2 Mintz 1963.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.