Vuestar Technologies

Last updated

Vuestar Technologies Pte Ltd is a Singapore-incorporated subsidiary owned by Australian parent Goldspirit Investments Pty Ltd. The owner of both companies, Ronald Neville Langford, [1] applied for a number of patents around the world relating to search techniques using hyperlinked images to other websites or web pages. [2]

Contents

In May 2008, Vuestar sent invoices to owners of several Singaporean websites demanding licensing fees if the websites wished to continue using "visual images" to link to other web pages. [3] [4] [5] A Singapore law firm advised people to carefully analyse the wide claims being made by Vuestar as to the intellectual property covered by their patent. [4] [6]

Company claims

Vuestar's website states that it has obtained granted patents for "a method of locating web-sites using visual images" in Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and the United States. [7] It says that website owners who "use visual images which hyperlink to other web-pages or web-sites in accordance with the patent ... whether on the first page or subsequent pages of a web-site" require a license from them to continue doing so legally. [8] User licenses are issued for one year and restricted to Singapore. [9] Annual licensing fees depend on web traffic as well as the extent of image hyperlinking [9] and range from nothing for governments, charities and non commercial enterprises to "millions". [10]

In May 2008, in a move which has sparked criticism among online communities, Vuestar sent invoices to owners of several Singaporean websites demanding licensing fees if the websites wished to continue using visual images to link to other web pages. [3] [4] Vuestar has stated that it also intends to enforce its rights in Australia and the United States. [3] [10]

Response

Owners of Arowana community site Arofanatics.com were sent an invoice for S$5,350, but they have said that they do not intend to pay. [10]

The actions of Vuestar have been called patent trolling by some. [11] [12] Ronald Langford, the inventor and a major shareholder of Vuestar Technologies, has stated that "there has been no law broken" and that his company is seeking payment for the use of its technology "because the company has been 'damaged financially to the tune of millions of dollars'" [13]

Eileen Yu, on the ZDNet Asia blog, suggested that Vuestar's patent was the result of a flawed patent-approval system. [14] However, she did also point out that Vuestar's claims might not be true or that they might have misinterpreted their patent. [14] Singapore law firm, Keystone Law, also advised people to carefully analyse Vuestar's wide claims on the intellectual property covered by their patent. [4] [6]

Vuestar's Singapore Headquarters VuestarSG.JPG
Vuestar's Singapore Headquarters

Patents

The patents owned by the parent company GoldSpirit Investment Pty Ltd and Vuestar Technology Pte Ltd were all registered under the name of inventor Ronald Langford, including US 7065520  , AU 755035   and Singaporean patent 95940. The Australian patent has ceased through failure to pay a renewal fee due in October 2007, according to the IPAustralian patent database. EPapplication 1327207   was also filed but lapsed through failure to pay a renewal fee before the European Patent Office had conducted their own prior art search.

All of these patents originated from WOapplication 0229623   which was searched and examined by IP Australia who were unable to identify any particularly relevant prior art. The patents in Australia and Singapore were therefore granted without significant limitations to the claims. The US patent was granted only after further examination by the US Patent and Trademark Office resulting in additional limitations being added to all of the independent claims as granted including that: "the visual content comprises a plurality of mini-images in the form of a conveyor belt slide show". Further US prosecution details are available via the USPTO Public PAIR system.

See also

Related Research Articles

Patent Type of legal protection for an invention

A patent is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the legal right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention for a limited period of time in exchange for publishing an enabling disclosure of the invention. In most countries, patent rights fall under private law and the patent holder must sue someone infringing the patent in order to enforce their rights. In some industries patents are an essential form of competitive advantage; in others they are irrelevant.

Hyperlink Method of referencing visual computer data

In computing, a hyperlink, or simply a link, is a reference to data that the user can follow by clicking or tapping. A hyperlink points to a whole document or to a specific element within a document. Hypertext is text with hyperlinks. The text that is linked from is called anchor text. A software system that is used for viewing and creating hypertext is a hypertext system, and to create a hyperlink is to hyperlink. A user following hyperlinks is said to navigate or browse the hypertext.

A software patent is a patent on a piece of software, such as a computer program, libraries, user interface, or algorithm.

The software patent debate is the argument about the extent to which, as a matter of public policy, it should be possible to patent software and computer-implemented inventions. Policy debate on software patents has been active for years. The opponents to software patents have gained more visibility with fewer resources through the years than their pro-patent opponents. Arguments and critiques have been focused mostly on the economic consequences of software patents.

Intellectual Ventures is an American private equity company that centers on the development and licensing of intellectual property. Intellectual Ventures is one of the top-five owners of U.S. patents, as of 2011. Its business model focuses on buying patents and aggregating those patents into a large patent portfolio and licensing these patents to third parties. The company has been described as the country's largest and most notorious patent trolling company, the ultimate patent troll, and the most hated company in tech.

M1 (Singaporean company) Telecommunication company in Singapore

M1 Limited is a Singaporean telecommunications company and one of the major telcos operating in the country. M1 was founded in 1994 and traded on the Singapore Exchange from 2002 to 2019. M1 is a subsidiary of the Keppel Corporation and Singapore Press Holdings through their joint venture, Konnectivity.

GNOME Foundation is a non-profit organization based in Orinda, California, United States, coordinating the efforts in the GNOME project.

Christian Copyright Licensing International (CCLI) is a privately owned company that was founded in the US in 1988 by Howard Rachinski. CCLI was launched after being developed by Rachinski for 3½ years while he was a music minister at a large church in Portland, Oregon. This prototype, called Starpraise Ministries, began in May 1985. CCLI offers copyright licensing of songs and other resource materials for use in Christian worship.

In international law and business, patent trolling or patent hoarding is a categorical or pejorative term applied to a person or company that attempts to enforce patent rights against accused infringers far beyond the patent's actual value or contribution to the prior art, often through hardball legal tactics. Patent trolls often do not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question. However, some entities which do not practice their asserted patent may not be considered "patent trolls" when they license their patented technologies on reasonable terms in advance.

Open Invention Network (OIN) is a company that acquires patents and licenses them royalty-free to its community members who, in turn, agree not to assert their own patents against Linux and Linux-related systems and applications.

This is a list of legal terms relating to patents. A patent is not a right to practice or use the invention, but a territorial right to exclude others from commercially exploiting the invention, granted to an inventor or his successor in rights in exchange to a public disclosure of the invention.

MPEG LA is an American company based in Denver, Colorado that licenses patent pools covering essential patents required for use of the MPEG-2, MPEG-4, IEEE 1394, VC-1, ATSC, MVC, MPEG-2 Systems, AVC/H.264 and HEVC standards.

Trademark Trade identifier of products or services

A trademark is a type of intellectual property consisting of a recognizable sign, design, or expression that identifies products or services from a particular source and distinguishes them from others. The trademark owner can be an individual, business organization, or any legal entity. A trademark may be located on a package, a label, a voucher, or on the product itself. Trademarks used to identify services are sometimes called service marks.

In copyright law, the legal status of hyperlinking and that of framing concern how courts address two different but related Web technologies. In large part, the legal issues concern use of these technologies to create or facilitate public access to proprietary media content — such as portions of commercial Web sites. When hyperlinking and framing have the effect of distributing, and creating routes for the distribution of content (information) that does not come from the proprietors of the Web pages affected by these practices, the proprietors often seek the aid of courts to suppress the conduct, particularly when the effect of the conduct is to disrupt or circumvent the proprietors' mechanisms for receiving financial compensation.

Defensive patent aggregation (DPA) is the practice of purchasing patents or patent rights to keep such patents out of the hands of entities that would assert them against operating companies. The opposite is offensive patent aggregation (OPA) which is the purchasing of patents in order to assert them against companies that would use the inventions protected by such patents and to grant licenses to these operating companies in return for licensing fees or royalties. OPA can be practiced by operating companies or Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)

Copyright troll Party that enforces copyrights for purposes of making money through litigation

A copyright troll is a party that enforces copyrights it owns for purposes of making money through strategic litigation, in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic, sometimes while without producing or licensing the works it owns for paid distribution. Critics object to the activity because they believe it does not encourage the production of creative works, but instead makes money through the inequities and unintended consequences of high statutory damages provisions in copyright laws intended to encourage creation of such works.

IPCom GmbH & Co. KG is a German intellectual property rights licensing and technology R&D company. Its R&D team actively contributes to communication standard setting bodies, focusing on 3GPP, while managing IPCom's global patent portfolio. IPCom has been described as a patent troll for its litigation practices.

<i>British Telecommunications plc v. Prodigy</i>

British Telecommunications plc v. Prodigy Communications Corp. was a patent infringement case which determined whether a patent related to communications between central computers and their clients was infringed by Internet service providers through hyperlinks. Judge Colleen McMahon of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Prodigy Communications Corporation had not infringed the patent held by British Telecommunications plc through its use of hyperlinks. On summary judgment, McMahon held that there were substantial differences between British Telecommunications' patent and the method of operation of the Internet. The decision limited patent protection for Internet service providers' use of hyperlinks, protecting the providers from licensing fees related to this integral part of Internet technology.

The LOTNetwork is a nonprofit organization that was formed to combat patent assertion entities (PAEs), also known as patent trolls, by cross-licensing patents that fall into the hands of PAEs.

InstantTV is a cloud software digital video recorder (DVR) operated by RecordTV Pte Ltd based in Singapore. The company was founded by Carlos Nicholas Fernandes in 2007 and previously offered services as RecordTV.com.

References

  1. TelecomTV – TelecomTV One – News Archived 23 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  2. All your Interwibble is belong to us, Silvie Barak, The Inquirer, 28 May 2008
  3. 1 2 3 Singapore Firm Claims Patent Breach By Virtually All Websites, Slashdot, 27 May 2008
  4. 1 2 3 4 S'pore firm claims patent to image search, Eileen Yu, ZDNet Asia, 27 May 2008
  5. VueStar.biz Archived 22 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine Frequently Asked Questions: Why do I need a User Licence?
  6. 1 2 Keystone Law Alert Archived 28 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine , Visual Images Search Patent
  7. Vuestar Technologies (2008). "Services". Archived from the original on 27 May 2008. Retrieved 28 May 2008.
  8. 1 2 Vuestar Technologies (2008). "Frequently asked questions". Archived from the original on 26 May 2008. Retrieved 28 May 2008.
  9. 1 2 3 Chua, Hian Hou (27 May 2008). "Patent breach by 'virtually all websites'? Pay up, firm demands". The Straits Times. pp. H5.
  10. Patent troll sending out invoices for image hyperlinks, Jacqui Cheng, Ars Technica, 28 May 2008
  11. Today in Patent Trolling: VueStar, John Biggs, The Washington Post (TechCrunch), 29 May 2008
  12. Man who sparked patent uproar says..., Liew Hanqing, The New Paper, 29 May 2008, quoted by refutevuestarpatent.biz Archived 6 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  13. 1 2 Is the law still not catching up?, Eileen Yo, ZDNet Asia BTW Blog