Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation

Last updated

The Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation was a nonprofit organization started by Daniel Snyder, controlling owner of the Washington Redskins football team. It was formed in 2014 under a climate of controversy around the name of the team, which Native American organizations such as the National Congress of American Indians consider offensive. According to a letter [1] from Snyder, it "will address the urgent challenges plaguing Indian country based on what tribal leaders tell us they need most." [2] In the letter to season ticket holders, announcing the Foundation, Snyder stated that he and other team representatives had visited 26 reservations in twenty states to "listen and learn first-hand about the views, attitudes, and experiences of the Tribes". The letter quotes Pueblo of Zuni Governor Arlen Quetawki, saying "I appreciated your sincerity to learn about our culture and the real life issues we face on a daily basis". Torrez-Martinez of Desert Cahuilla was quoted in the letter as saying, "There are Native Americans everywhere that 100 percent support the Redskins". [2] Snyder also used his letter to cite instances of support for the team name by other Native Americans during his visits. [3]

Contents

After decades of defending the name, amidst the removal of many names and images as part of the George Floyd protests, and pressure from investors and sponsors, the Redskins began the process of changing their name. [4] [5] On July 23, 2020 the team announced that, given that a rebranding will take 12 to 18 months, they will be called the Washington Football Team with a block "W" logo for the 2020 season. [6] In September 2020 the foundation was renamed Washington Football Team Original Americans Foundation, but in November 2020 the team announced that it would no longer have any connection to the foundation. [7] On February 2, 2022, the new team name, Washington Commanders, was announced.

Background

Prior to the official announcement of the foundation, there had been news reports of meetings by Snyder with tribal leaders in Alabama and New Mexico to discuss charitable donations and economic development; which received mixed responses from Native Americans. Some welcome any assistance with poverty and the other problems poverty creates; while others see it as purely public relations. Robert McGhee, treasurer of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians in Atmore, AL said: "I thought the whole meeting was odd." [8] [9] On his visit to the A:shiwi A:wan Museum and Heritage Center in New Mexico, Snyder was given a guided tour by the director, Jim Enote. When Enote told Snyder he was not pleased with the Redskins mascot and team name Snyder snapped back with, "We are a football team." [10] [11]

Gary L. Edwards (Cherokee), the chief executive of the National Native American Law Enforcement Association (NNALEA) was named director of OAF. As CEO of NNALEA, Edwards serves or has served on the following advisory committees and task forces: the National Incident Management System; the National Response Plan; the Funding of First Responders; Preparedness and Information Sharing; Pilot Capabilities Assessment Project; SAFECOM Advisory Group; the Department of Homeland Security's National Preparedness Goal State, Tribal and Local Working Group; as well as the Department of Justice's Counter-Terrorism Training Coordination Working Group, Intelligence Training Coordination Working Group and Officer Safety and Wellness Task Force. The NNALEA was cited in a US Dept. of Interior Inspector General's (IG) report for failing to produce any usable work to fulfill a contract with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, leading to cancellation of that contract. Edwards was not mentioned by name. [12] The IG report was most critical of the BIA for allowing language in the contract that resulted in the NNALEA being paid almost $1 million without requiring results. [13] A number of female employees accused Edwards of sexual harassment, and said that they received expensive gifts from him purchased with foundation funds. [14]

Reception and criticism

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell stated that he takes the creation of the foundation as an indication that Snyder is "doing his due diligence when it comes to listening to the public about the franchise's controversial name, and he continues to stand behind the name due to strong public support." [15]

The National Congress of American Indians issued a statement saying it is glad that Snyder is dedicating time and resources to Native American issues. "However, this Foundation will only contribute to the problems in Indian Country if it does not also address the very real issue of how Native people are consistently stereotyped, caricatured, and denigrated by mascot imagery and the use of the R-word slur," the statement read. "For Mr. Snyder and the Foundation to truly support and partner with Indian Country, they must first change the name of the D.C. team and prove that the creation of this organization isn't just a publicity stunt." [16] In an editorial in the Washington Post, Brian Cladoosby, the president of the NCAI wrote: "Snyder, his team and the NFL are welcome to join Indian country as allies and partners but only when they make their most significant contribution up front: Retire the name of this team. Only then will we truly know Snyder's commitment to Indian country, to Native youth and to a future where tribal nations and our people are treated as equal to all other Americans." [17] The initial critical responses to the foundation from some Native American advocates was almost overshadowed in the media by the response to Stephen Colbert's attempt at satire. [18]

In response to the foundation, ESPN commentator Keith Olbermann asked why, if "Redskin" is not insulting, Snyder never uses the term to refer to Native Americans? [19] Senator Harry Reid called the foundation "a phony deal" and predicted that the name will change within three years. [20] In a letter posted on her website, Congresswoman Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) calls the foundation an "attempt to buy the silence of Native Americans with a foundation that is equal parts public relations scheme and tax deduction." [21] In The New York Times, author David Treuer (Ojibwe) places the creation of the foundation in the context of the long history of Native American being given gifts rather than real change that would make a difference. [22]

In an editorial Rick Cohen, a former executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP) notes that there are signs that any assistance given to Native Americans will be contingent on silence, if not support of the team name by the recipients. Also, the creation of a new foundation, by joining the team name with Native Americans, is an obvious public relations tactic, since both Snyder and the team have existing charitable foundations which could have made contributions to existing Native American organizations. [23] Diana Aviv, president and CEO of Independent Sector, a leadership organization representing nonprofits, foundations and corporate grant makers, criticized the Washington NFL team's Original Americans Foundation stating: "Creating a new foundation using the language found in the Washington NFL team's name is offensive not only to Native communities, but to all people of goodwill who believe it is important to treat others with respect and dignity". [24] The Joint Affinity Groups and Native Americans in Philanthropy have issued a statement that the OAF's "laudable philanthropic goals are undermined by the continued use of a racist slur in the name of the foundation and the franchise that founded it", and asks "Is it exploitive to offer funds or other financial benefits to under-served tribal communities in exchange for tacit permission to continue using that identifiably racist/stereotypic mascot term?" [25]

Redskins general manager Bruce Allen responded to the criticism by saying the foundation is not intended to buy support. [26]

Funded projects and results

For recipients of one of the initial donations, the Lame Deer, Montana public schools on the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, there is a range of opinion regarding the name of the Washington team, but the tribe's Economic development administrator Steve Small, said "We had to weigh need against principle." The publisher of the reservation newspaper called the foundation "...a slick PR move to gain support from poor Native Americans to keep the Redskins mascot. It's cheaper than changing the brand name and commerce associated with the current mascot and logo." [27]

Upon learning that the OAF would be the title sponsor of a celebrity golf tournament in Arizona, two of the other sponsors withdrew their participation in protest. First was the National Indian Gaming Association, whose chairman, Ernest Stevens, said his organization finds the NFL team's name to be offensive and is skeptical about the motives of the foundation". [28] Next was the Notah Begay III Foundation, its executive director Crystal Echo Hawk stating: "I find it underhanded and despicable that the Washington football team would co-opt this event. As soon as we found out about their involvement we withdrew our support." [29] Later, an additional sponsor, the Navajo Nation Gaming Enterprise, stated that they would have declined sponsorship had they known in advance of the Redsk*ns involvement. [30] After the event, the Navajo Nation President Ben Shelly thanked the sponsors and expressed disappointment at those who had withdrawn support. [31]

Members of the Fort Yuma Quechan Tribe say they refused a "bribe" from the Washington Redskins organization, which tribal members say offered a blank check to fund a skatepark in their community. [32] The Quechan Memorial Skatepark is an existing project intended to provide an activity for young people, while serving as a memorial to those lost to suicide. [33]

The Chippewa Cree Tribe of Montana accepted money from the foundation to build a playground, leaders stating that they do not care about the controversy. [34]

The Zuni Pueblo tribe sent notice to Native artists that representatives of the OAF would be visiting on August 11, 2014 to buy artwork, in particular anything that incorporated the team logo or colors. [35] The director of the Zuni Museum and Heritage Center characterized the event as part of a "spin doctoring" campaign, and wondered why the purchases would not be made through the existing markets for Zuni artworks. [10]

According to a report filed with the IRS, the OAF donated $3.7 million to 20 tribes during 2014, its first year of operation. [36] The amount dropped to 1.6 million in the second year, with no explanation being given. [37] However, the team has spent at least a half a million dollars lobbying Congress regarding the foundation since 2014. [38]

Current status

It has been noted that there has been no reports of activity by the foundation in the first months of 2015, and references to the OAF have disappeared from the main website of the team. [39] The chairwoman of the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah , Gari Pikyavit Lafferty, has been removed from office by a majority vote of the tribal council for accepting personal gifts in exchange for her support of the OAF and the Redskins team name. [40] Lafferty's subsequent appeal of her impeachment has been denied. [41] Phil Gover, a member of the Paiute tribe and one of the petitioners in the case that cancelled the Redskins trademarks, states that the foundation is having a corrupting influence. [42] In August, 2015, the Cheyenne River Sioux Council in South Dakota voted to return a $25,000 check issued to the Cheyenne River Rodeo Association on July 10, and decline any further donations from the Original Americans Foundation. [43] After accepting a $200,000 donation for the prior year, the Indian National Finals Rodeo (INFR), which says it is the U.S.' and Canada's largest rodeo organization for Native Americans, sent a letter refusing any further donations. INFR Vice President Michael Bo Vocu stated "After much soul searching, we have decided that we cannot in good conscience accept resources from you on the terms you have offered, no matter how desperately we need it ... because, as you know, the resources you are offering are not truly philanthropic – they come with the expectation that we will support the racial slur that continues to promote your associated professional football team's name." Last year the Redskins primary logo appeared at many Native rodeo events, creating a backlash from those offended by it. [44]

With the announcement in July, 2020 that the Redskins management is doing a review of the team name, Sports Illustrated investigated the foundation and found that funding was cut back after the resolution of the trademark cases in 2017. In addition, some of the funds that were spent went not to Native Americans, but to schools that also used Redskins as their sport team name, such as St. Johns High School in Arizona and McLoud High School in Oklahoma were Native Americans are only a minority of students, 7% and 13% respectively. [45]

Soon after the team dropped the Redskins name, the foundation's charitable activity dwindled, and its corporate existence lapsed due to the failure to file reports to the Virginia State Corporation Commission. In September, 2020 the foundation was reinstated and the name was changed to Washington Football Team Original Americans Foundation. When a prior recipient of donations requested aid from the foundation to pay for COVID-19 testing, the request was denied. In October, the team said it had decided to no longer sponsor the foundation. [14]

Comedy Central aired a segment of The Colbert Report that attempted to satirize the establishment of the Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation by proposing a foundation called the "Ching-Chong Ding-Dong Foundation for Sensitivity to Orientals or Whatever". [46] The resulting campaign to "CancelColbert" by Asian Americans overshadowed the initial response from Native Americans opposed to the Redskins foundation. [47]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Washington Commanders</span> American football team based in the Washington, D.C. area

The Washington Commanders are a professional American football team based in the Washington metropolitan area. The Commanders compete in the National Football League (NFL) as a member club of the league's National Football Conference (NFC) East division. The team plays its home games at FedExField in Landover, Maryland; its headquarters and training facility are in Ashburn, Virginia. The team has played more than 1,000 games and is one of only five in the NFL with more than 600 total wins. Washington was among the first NFL franchises with a fight song, "Hail to the Commanders", which is played by their marching band after every touchdown scored by the team at home. The franchise is valued by Forbes at US$5.6 billion, making them the league's sixth-most valuable team as of 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Preston Marshall</span> American businessman and founder of the NFLs Washington Commanders (1896–1969)

George Preston Marshall was an American businessman best known for founding the Washington Redskins, an American football franchise belonging to the National Football League (NFL). He founded the team as the Boston Braves in 1932 and was its controlling owner until his death in 1969. Marshall, a supporter of racial segregation, was the last NFL owner to integrate African Americans onto a roster, only doing so in 1962 under pressure from the federal government, which threatened to block the use of D.C. Stadium, which they owned, unless he did.

"Hail to the Commanders" (HTTC) is the fight song of the Washington Commanders, an American football team belonging to the National Football League (NFL). At home games, the song is performed by the Washington Commanders Marching Band when the team scores a touchdown. Composed in 1937, the song was performed as "Hail to the Redskins" until 2019, when the team retired the controversial Redskins name.

Redskin is a slang term for Native Americans in the United States and First Nations in Canada. The term redskin underwent pejoration through the 19th to early 20th centuries and in contemporary dictionaries of American English it is labeled as offensive, disparaging, or insulting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Snyder</span> Owner of the Washington Commanders

Daniel Marc Snyder is an American businessman and owner of the Washington Commanders, an American football team belonging to the National Football League (NFL). He bought the team, then known as the Washington Redskins, from Jack Kent Cooke's estate in 1999. Snyder's ownership of the team has been controversial, with accusations of a toxic workplace culture leading to a Congressional investigation, as well as the lack of success sustained by the team.

<i>Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo</i> U.S. trademark law case

Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo, 415 F.3d 44, is a case in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia considered the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to cancel the registration of the Washington Redskins football team, based on the claim that the name was disparaging to Native Americans. The Court of Appeals did not actually reach the merits of the TTAB's decision; it sent the case back to the trial court for consideration of a procedural issue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Suzan Shown Harjo</span> Cheyenne-Holdulgee Muscogee activist

Suzan Shown Harjo is an advocate for Native American rights. She is a poet, writer, lecturer, curator, and policy advocate who has helped Native peoples recover more than one million acres (4,000 km²) of tribal lands. After co-producing the first American Indian news show in the nation for WBAI radio while living in New York City, and producing other shows and theater, in 1974 she moved to Washington, D.C., to work on national policy issues. She served as Congressional liaison for Indian affairs in the President Jimmy Carter administration and later as president of the National Council of American Indians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native American mascot controversy</span>

Since the 1960s, the issue of Native American and First Nations names and images being used by sports teams as mascots has been the subject of increasing public controversy in the United States and Canada. This has been a period of rising Indigenous civil rights movements, and Native Americans and their supporters object to the use of images and names in a manner and context they consider derogatory. They have conducted numerous protests and tried to educate the public on this issue.

The Washington Redhawks was a culture jam created by a group of Native Americans to draw attention to the Washington Redskins name controversy. In 2020, the team retired the Redskins branding amidst the removal of many names and images as part of the George Floyd protests. The football team was later renamed the Washington Commanders in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Raymond Halbritter</span>

Arthur Raymond (Ray) Halbritter is an American businessman who is the current Nation Representative and CEO of Oneida Nation Enterprises, a major casino and tobacco conglomerate in Upstate New York. He is a member of the Oneida Indian Nation's Wolf Clan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Washington Redskins name controversy</span> Controversy involving the name and logo of the Washington Redskins NFL team

The Washington Redskins name controversy involved the name and logo previously used by the Washington Commanders, a National Football League (NFL) franchise located in the Washington metropolitan area. In the 1960s, the team's longtime name—the Redskins—and the associated logo began to draw criticism from Native American groups and individuals. The topic, part of the larger Native American mascot controversy, began receiving widespread public attention in the 1990s. In 2020, the team responded to economic pressure in the wake of widespread recognition of systemic racism by retiring the name and logo. The team called itself the "Washington Football Team" before rebranding as the Commanders in 2022.

Amanda Blackhorse is a social worker and member of the Navajo people who is known for her work as an activist on the Washington Redskins name controversy. She is the lead plaintiff in Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc.

The Washington Redskins trademark dispute was a legal effort by Native Americans to define the term "redskin" to be an offensive and pejorative racial slur to deprive the owners of the NFL's Washington Redskins of the ability to maintain federal trademark protection for the name. These efforts had primarily been carried forward in two cases brought before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While prevailing in the most recent case in which the trademarks were cancelled, petitioners withdrew for further litigation now that the legal issue has become moot due to a decision in another case which found the relevant portion of the trademark law to be an unconstitutional infringement on freedom of speech.

Sports teams named Redskins are part of the larger controversy regarding the use of Native American names, images and symbols by non-native sports teams. Teams of this name have received particular public attention because the term redskin is now generally regarded as disparaging and offensive.

During the years of increasing awareness of the Washington Redskins name controversy, public opinion polls were part of the discussion about whether Native Americans found the term redskin insulting. Other polls gauged how the general public viewed the controversy.

The use of terms and images referring to Native Americans/First Nations as the name or mascot for a sports team is a topic of public controversy in the United States and in Canada, arising as part of the Native American/First Nations civil rights movements. Since the 1960s, there have been a number of protests and other actions by Native Americans and others targeting the more prominent use of such names and images by professional franchises such as the Cleveland Indians and the Washington Redskins. However, discourse surrounding mascot usage by elementary, middle, and high schools has been prominent, as these entities are subject to public legislation and community input.

First Nations Development Institute is a nonprofit organization that assists Native American tribes, their communities, and Native nonprofits in economic development by providing technical assistance, training, policy, and the awarding of grants. Public education is another area of focus. It is based in Longmont, Colorado. Charity Navigator gave First Nations Development Institute a four-star rating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chicago Blackhawks name and logo controversy</span>

The Chicago Blackhawks name and logo controversy refers to the controversy surrounding the name and logo of the Chicago Blackhawks, a National Hockey League (NHL) ice hockey team based in Chicago, Illinois. The use of terms and images referring to Native Americans/First Nations as the name or mascot for a sports team without permissions from or consultations with local Indigenous communities, is a topic of public controversy in the United States and Canada. Since the 1960s, as part of the indigenous civil rights movements, there have been a number of protests and other actions by Native Americans and their supporters targeting the more prominent use of such names and images by professional franchises such as the Cleveland Guardians formerly known as the "Indians" of Major League Baseball (MLB) that was officially discontinued in 2016; the Washington Commanders formerly known as the "Redskins" of the National Football League (NFL), the NFL's Kansas City Chiefs and MLB's Atlanta Braves, the latter two attracting criticism of "the tomahawk chop" often performed by their fans. Like other teams with tribal mascots, there are calls from Indigenous activists and organizations to change the Blackhawks' name and logo and eliminate tribal mascots and imagery throughout sports. In contrast to generic names used by other teams, Blackhawks refers to a World War I-era U.S. Army battalion which was named for prominent Illinois-based Native American chief Black Hawk.

The Kansas City Chiefs were the last professional team in the United States to adopt a name or logo referencing Native Americans, although indirectly. When the Dallas Texans (AFL) relocated in 1963 they became the Chiefs in honor of Kansas City mayor Harold Roe Bartle who was instrumental in bringing the Texans to Kansas City, Missouri. Bartle earned his nickname as founder of a Boy Scouts honor camping society, Tribe of Mic-O-Say, in which he was "Chief" Lone Bear.

References

  1. "Redskins' Dan Snyder launches Original Americans Foundation". NFL.
  2. 1 2 Mike Jones (March 24, 2014). "Daniel Snyder starting Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation". The Washington Post.
  3. Alex Fitzpatrick (March 24, 2014). "Redskins Owner Announces Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation". Time, Inc.
  4. McDonald, Scott (July 1, 2020). "Washington Redskins Urged to Lose Name, or Millions in Sponsorships". Newsweek . Retrieved July 3, 2020.
  5. Clarke, Liz (July 2, 2020). "FedEx calls on Redskins to change name following investors' demands on sponsors". The Washington Post .
  6. Carpenter, Les; Maske, Mark (July 23, 2020). "NFL franchise to go by 'Washington Football Team' this season, delaying permanent name change". The Washington Post.
  7. Schad, Tom (November 18, 2020). "Washington Football Team ends relationship with Daniel Snyder's charitable foundation for Native Americans". USA Today.
  8. Erik Brady (November 6, 2013). "Redskins' Daniel Snyder meets with Alabama tribe". USA Today.
  9. Theresa Vargas; Liz Clarke (December 21, 2013). "Redskins owner Dan Snyder makes visits to Indian Country amid name-change pressure". The Washington Post.
  10. 1 2 Jim Enote (August 11, 2014). "We Are Not Redskins". Indian Country Today.
  11. Erik Brady (August 11, 2014). "Tribal member says Dan Snyder dismissed name complaint". USA TODAY Sports.
  12. Theresa Vargas; Tom Jackman (March 28, 2014). "CEO of new Washington Redskins foundation connected to 'defective' federal contract". The Washington Post.
  13. Matt Connolly (March 28, 2014). "Washington NFL Team's New Native American Foundation Is Already Off to a Great Start". Mother Jones.
  14. 1 2 Will Hobson (November 18, 2020). "Harassment claims and dwindling donations: The fall of Daniel Snyder's nonprofit for Native Americans". The Washington Post.
  15. Tim Daniels (March 26, 2014). "Roger Goodell Stands by Washington Redskins Keeping Controversial Name". Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
  16. Theresa Vargas; Mike Jones (March 25, 2014). "New Redskins foundation is helping tribes, but it won't quell name controversy". The Washington Post.
  17. Brian Cladoosby (April 4, 2014). "The first project for Snyder's foundation: Changing a name". The Washington Post.
  18. "Snyder Wins: How 'CancelColbert' Drowned Out the Native Voice". April 1, 2014.
  19. Noah Rothman (March 26, 2014). "Olbermann: If Redskins Isn't 'Racist,' Why Doesn't Dan Snyder Call Native Americans That?".
  20. John Keim (March 27, 2014). "Senator: Foundation won't fix issue". ESPN.com.
  21. "McCollum Responds to Continued Use of Racist Native American Mascot By NFL Owner Dan Snyder". March 25, 2014.
  22. David Treuer (April 2, 2014). "The Price of a Slur". The New York Times.
  23. Rick Cohen (March 26, 2014). "3 Objections to Dan Snyder's Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation". Nonprofit Quartlerly. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
  24. Erik Brady (August 5, 2014). "Nonprofit group criticizes Washington NFL team name". USA TODAY Sports.
  25. "Joint Affinity Groups Stand in Unity to Address Racism in Philanthropy" (PDF). August 14, 2014.
  26. "Washington Redskins not trying to buy Native American support with foundation, GM Bruce Allen says". ESPN. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
  27. Clara Caufield (April 3, 2014). "Guest opinion: Needs of impoverished neighbors test journalist's principles".
  28. Brent Schrotenboer (April 12, 2014). "Redskins foundation golf event loses sponsor in protest". USA TODAY Sports.
  29. Erik Brady (April 13, 2014). "Washington Redskins foundation loses another event sponsor". USA TODAY Sports.
  30. Nicholet Deschine (April 15, 2014). "Snyder's Redsk*ns Hush Money and KTNN's Questionable Behavior".
  31. "Navajo President slams the National Indian Gaming Association". The Navajo Post. April 17, 2014.
  32. Matthew Hendley (July 17, 2014). "Yuma-Area Native Americans Blast Offer From Washington Redskins to Fund New Skate Park". Phoenix New Times.
  33. "Quechan Memorial Skatepark" . Retrieved July 19, 2014.
  34. Erik Brady (July 31, 2014). "Montana Indian tribe happy to take Redskins' money". USA TODAY Sports.
  35. Erik Brady (August 8, 2014). "Redskins foundation seeks Native artwork with team logo". USA TODAY Sports.
  36. John Woodrow Cox (January 15, 2016). "Redskins foundation gave $3.7 million to more than 20 tribes, the team says". The Washington Post.
  37. John Woodrow Cox (April 15, 2017). "Donations to tribes by Daniel Snyder's Redskins foundation plummet in second year, records show". The Washington Post.
  38. Zielonka, Adam; Sinn, Dylan (December 19, 2017). "More than a Mascot: Redskins High Schools". Philip Merrill College of Journalism. Capital News Service. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  39. Ronald Guy (March 28, 2015). "Washington Redskins: The Original Americans Foundation Falls Silent". football.com.
  40. Lindsay Whitehurst (April 3, 2015). "Utah tribe's leader removed from office over Redskins gifts". Associated Press.
  41. Kevin Jenkins (May 12, 2015). "Paiutes deny ex-chairwoman's appeal of her impeachment". The Spectrum.
  42. Phil Gover (2015-04-07). "Daniel Snyder's 'Gifts' to Natives Undermine and Corrupt" (Text). Indian Country Today Media Network. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
  43. John Woodrow Cox (August 5, 2015). "Native American tribe votes to reject $25,000 offered by Washington Redskins foundation". The Washington Post.
  44. Travis Waldron (September 4, 2015). "Native American Rodeo Breaks With DC Football Team's Charity Over 'Racial Slur' Name". The Huffington Post.
  45. Vrentas, Jenny; Rosenberg, Michael (July 8, 2020). "Dan Snyder Started a Foundation to Support Native Americans. Has It Abandoned Its Mission?". Sports Illustrated.
  46. Jay Caspian Kang (March 30, 2014). "The Campaign to "Cancel" Colbert". The New Yorker.
  47. "Snyder Wins: How 'CancelColbert' Drowned Out the Native Voice". Indian Country Today. April 1, 2014.