Dissipative particle dynamics

Last updated

Dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) is an off-lattice mesoscopic simulation technique [1] which involves a set of particles moving in continuous space and discrete time. Particles represent whole molecules or fluid regions, rather than single atoms, and atomistic details are not considered relevant to the processes addressed. The particles' internal degrees of freedom are integrated out and replaced by simplified pairwise dissipative and random forces, so as to conserve momentum locally and ensure correct hydrodynamic behaviour. The main advantage of this method is that it gives access to longer time and length scales than are possible using conventional MD simulations. Simulations of polymeric fluids in volumes up to 100 nm in linear dimension for tens of microseconds are now common.

Contents

DPD was initially devised by Hoogerbrugge and Koelman [2] [3] to avoid the lattice artifacts of the so-called lattice gas automata and to tackle hydrodynamic time and space scales beyond those available with molecular dynamics (MD). It was subsequently reformulated and slightly modified by P. Español [4] to ensure the proper thermal equilibrium state. A series of new DPD algorithms with reduced computational complexity and better control of transport properties are presented. [5] The algorithms presented in this article choose randomly a pair particle for applying DPD thermostating thus reducing the computational complexity.

Equations

The total non-bonded force acting on a DPD particle i is given by a sum over all particles j that lie within a fixed cut-off distance, of three pairwise-additive forces:

where the first term in the above equation is a conservative force, the second a dissipative force and the third a random force. The conservative force acts to give beads a chemical identity, while the dissipative and random forces together form a thermostat that keeps the mean temperature of the system constant. A key property of all of the non-bonded forces is that they conserve momentum locally, so that hydrodynamic modes of the fluid emerge even for small particle numbers. Local momentum conservation requires that the random force between two interacting beads be antisymmetric. Each pair of interacting particles therefore requires only a single random force calculation. This distinguishes DPD from Brownian dynamics in which each particle experiences a random force independently of all other particles. Beads can be connected into ‘molecules’ by tying them together with soft (often Hookean) springs. The most common applications of DPD keep the particle number, volume and temperature constant, and so take place in the NVT ensemble. Alternatively, the pressure instead of the volume is held constant, so that the simulation is in the NPT ensemble.

Parallelization

In principle, simulations of very large systems, approaching a cubic micron for milliseconds, are possible using a parallel implementation of DPD running on multiple processors in a Beowulf-style cluster. Because the non-bonded forces are short-ranged in DPD, it is possible to parallelize a DPD code very efficiently using a spatial domain decomposition technique. In this scheme, the total simulation space is divided into a number of cuboidal regions each of which is assigned to a distinct processor in the cluster. Each processor is responsible for integrating the equations of motion of all beads whose centres of mass lie within its region of space. Only beads lying near the boundaries of each processor's space require communication between processors. In order to ensure that the simulation is efficient, the crucial requirement is that the number of particle-particle interactions that require inter-processor communication be much smaller than the number of particle-particle interactions within the bulk of each processor's region of space. Roughly speaking, this means that the volume of space assigned to each processor should be sufficiently large that its surface area (multiplied by a distance comparable to the force cut-off distance) is much less than its volume.

Applications

A wide variety of complex hydrodynamic phenomena have been simulated using DPD, the list here is necessarily incomplete. The goal of these simulations often is to relate the macroscopic non-Newtonian flow properties of the fluid to its microscopic structure. Such DPD applications range from modeling the rheological properties of concrete [6] to simulating liposome formation in biophysics [7] to other recent three-phase phenomena such as dynamic wetting. [8]

The DPD method has also found popularity in modeling heterogeneous multi-phase flows containing deformable objects such as blood cells [9] and polymer micelles. [10]

Further reading

The full trace of the developments of various important aspects of the DPD methodology since it was first proposed in the early 1990s can be found in "Dissipative Particle Dynamics: Introduction, Methodology and Complex Fluid Applications – A Review". [11]

The state-of-the-art in DPD was captured in a CECAM workshop in 2008. [12] Innovations to the technique presented there include DPD with energy conservation; non-central frictional forces that allow the fluid viscosity to be tuned; an algorithm for preventing bond crossing between polymers; and the automated calibration of DPD interaction parameters from atomistic molecular dynamics. Recently, examples of automated calibration and parameterization have been shown against experimental observables. Additionally, datasets for the purpose of interaction potential calibration and parameterisation have been explored. [13] [14] Swope et al, have provided a detailed analysis of literature data and an experimental dataset based on Critical micelle concentration (CMC) and micellar mean aggregation number (Nagg). [15] Examples of micellar simulations using DPD have been well documented previously. [16] [17] [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Micelle</span> Group of fatty molecules suspended in liquid by soaps and/or detergents

A micelle or micella is an aggregate of surfactant amphipathic lipid molecules dispersed in a liquid, forming a colloidal suspension. A typical micelle in water forms an aggregate with the hydrophilic "head" regions in contact with surrounding solvent, sequestering the hydrophobic single-tail regions in the micelle centre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antibubble</span> Droplet of liquid surrounded by a thin film of gas

An antibubble is a droplet of liquid surrounded by a thin film of gas, as opposed to a gas bubble, which is a sphere of gas surrounded by a liquid. Antibubbles are formed when liquid drops or flows turbulently into the same or another liquid. They can either skim across the surface of a liquid such as water, in which case they are also called water globules, or they can be completely submerged into the liquid to which they are directed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics</span> Method of hydrodynamics simulation

Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is a computational method used for simulating the mechanics of continuum media, such as solid mechanics and fluid flows. It was developed by Gingold and Monaghan and Lucy in 1977, initially for astrophysical problems. It has been used in many fields of research, including astrophysics, ballistics, volcanology, and oceanography. It is a meshfree Lagrangian method, and the resolution of the method can easily be adjusted with respect to variables such as density.

Parallel tempering, in physics and statistics, is a computer simulation method typically used to find the lowest energy state of a system of many interacting particles. It addresses the problem that at high temperatures, one may have a stable state different from low temperature, whereas simulations at low temperatures may become "stuck" in a metastable state. It does this by using the fact that the high temperature simulation may visit states typical of both stable and metastable low temperature states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Coveney</span>

Peter V. Coveney is a Professor of Physical Chemistry, Honorary Professor of Computer Science, and the Director of the Centre for Computational Science (CCS) and Associate Director of the Advanced Research Computing Centre at University College London (UCL). He is also a Professor of Applied High Performance Computing at University of Amsterdam (UvA) and Professor Adjunct at the Yale School of Medicine, Yale University. He is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering and Member of Academia Europaea. Coveney is active in a broad area of interdisciplinary research including condensed matter physics and chemistry, materials science, as well as life and medical sciences in all of which high performance computing plays a major role. The citation about Coveney on his election as a FREng says: Coveney "has made outstanding contributions across a wide range of scientific and engineering fields, including physics, chemistry, chemical engineering, materials, computer science, high performance computing and biomedicine, much of it harnessing the power of supercomputing to conduct original research at unprecedented space and time scales. He has shown outstanding leadership across these fields, manifested through running multiple initiatives and multi-partner interdisciplinary grants, in the UK, Europe and the US. His achievements at national and international level in advocacy and enablement are exceptional".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Force field (chemistry)</span> Concept on molecular modeling

In the context of chemistry and molecular modelling, a force field is a computational method that is used to estimate the forces between atoms within molecules and also between molecules. More precisely, the force field refers to the functional form and parameter sets used to calculate the potential energy of a system of atoms or coarse-grained particles in molecular mechanics, molecular dynamics, or Monte Carlo simulations. The parameters for a chosen energy function may be derived from experiments in physics and chemistry, calculations in quantum mechanics, or both. Force fields are interatomic potentials and utilize the same concept as force fields in classical physics, with the difference that the force field parameters in chemistry describe the energy landscape, from which the acting forces on every particle are derived as a gradient of the potential energy with respect to the particle coordinates.

A polymer brush is the name given to a surface coating consisting of polymers tethered to a surface. The brush may be either in a solvated state, where the tethered polymer layer consists of polymer and solvent, or in a melt state, where the tethered chains completely fill up the space available. These polymer layers can be tethered to flat substrates such as silicon wafers, or highly curved substrates such as nanoparticles. Also, polymers can be tethered in high density to another single polymer chain, although this arrangement is normally named a bottle brush. Additionally, there is a separate class of polyelectrolyte brushes, when the polymer chains themselves carry an electrostatic charge.

Multi-particle collision dynamics (MPC), also known as stochastic rotation dynamics (SRD), is a particle-based mesoscale simulation technique for complex fluids which fully incorporates thermal fluctuations and hydrodynamic interactions. Coupling of embedded particles to the coarse-grained solvent is achieved through molecular dynamics.

Philippe Blanchard has been a Professor of Mathematical Physics at Faculty of Physics, Bielefeld University since 1980. He is both director of the Research Center BiBoS and deputy managing director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research at Bielefeld University.

The term file dynamics is the motion of many particles in a narrow channel.

Force matching is a research method consisting of test subjects attempting to produce a set forces that are equal to a set of more reliable reference forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PK-3 Plus (ISS experiment)</span>

The Plasmakristall-3 Plus laboratory was a joint Russian-German laboratory for the investigation of dusty/complex plasmas on board the International Space Station (ISS), with the principal investigators at the German Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics and the Russian Institute for High Energy Densities. It was the successor to the PKE Nefedov experiment with improvements in hardware, diagnostics and software. The laboratory was launched in December 2005 and was operated for the first time in January 2006. It was used in 21 missions until it was deorbited in 2013. It is succeeded by the PK-4 Laboratory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Force chain</span>

In the study of the physics of granular materials, a force chain consists of a set of particles within a compressed granular material that are held together and jammed into place by a network of mutual compressive forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matjaž Perc</span> Professor of Physics at the University of Maribor

Matjaž Perc is Professor of Physics at the University of Maribor in Slovenia, and director of the Complex Systems Center Maribor. He is member of Academia Europaea and among top 1% most cited physicists according to Thomson Reuters Highly Cited Researchers. He is Outstanding Referee of the Physical Review and Physical Review Letters journals, and Distinguished Referee of EPL. He received the Young Scientist Award for Socio-and Econophysics in 2015. His research has been widely reported in the media and professional literature.

Richard Anthony Lewis JonesFInstP FLSW is professor of Materials Physics and Innovation Policy at the University of Manchester having been professor of physics at the University of Sheffield until 2020.

Nikolay Victorovich Prokof'ev is a Russian-American physicist known for his works on supersolidity and strongly correlated systems and pioneering numerical approaches.

In mathematical physics, the diagrammatic Monte Carlo method is based on stochastic summation of Feynman diagrams with controllable error bars. It was developed by Boris Svistunov and Nikolay Prokof'ev. It was proposed as a generic approach to overcome the numerical sign problem that precludes simulations of many-body fermionic problems. Diagrammatic Monte Carlo works in the thermodynamic limit, and its computational complexity does not scale exponentially with system or cluster volume.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elizabeth Gardner (physicist)</span> British theoretical physicist

Elizabeth Gardner was a British theoretical physicist. She is best known for her groundbreaking work on a phase transition known as the Gardner transition and on disordered networks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaniadakis Gaussian distribution</span> Continuous probability distribution

The Kaniadakis Gaussian distribution is a probability distribution which arises as a generalization of the Gaussian distribution from the maximization of the Kaniadakis entropy under appropriated constraints. It is one example of a Kaniadakis κ-distribution. The κ-Gaussian distribution has been applied successfully for describing several complex systems in economy, geophysics, astrophysics, among many others.

References

  1. Santo, Kolattukudy P.; Neimark, Alexander V. (December 2021). "Dissipative particle dynamics simulations in colloid and Interface science: a review". Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 298: 102545. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2021.102545. PMID   34757286. S2CID   243939224.
  2. Hoogerbrugge, P. J; Koelman, J. M. V. A (1992). "Simulating Microscopic Hydrodynamic Phenomena with Dissipative Particle Dynamics". Europhysics Letters (EPL). 19 (3): 155–160. Bibcode:1992EL.....19..155H. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001. ISSN   0295-5075. S2CID   250796817.
  3. Koelman, J. M. V. A; Hoogerbrugge, P. J (1993). "Dynamic Simulations of Hard-Sphere Suspensions Under Steady Shear". Europhysics Letters (EPL). 21 (3): 363–368. Bibcode:1993EL.....21..363K. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/21/3/018. ISSN   0295-5075. S2CID   250913111.
  4. Español, P; Warren, P (1995). "Statistical Mechanics of Dissipative Particle Dynamics". Europhysics Letters (EPL). 30 (4): 191–196. Bibcode:1995EL.....30..191E. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/30/4/001. ISSN   0295-5075. S2CID   14385201.
  5. Goga, N.; Rzepiela, A. J.; de Vries, A. H.; Marrink, S. J.; Berendsen, H. J. C. (2012). "Efficient Algorithms for Langevin and DPD Dynamics". Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 8 (10): 3637–3649. doi: 10.1021/ct3000876 . ISSN   1549-9618. PMID   26593009.
  6. James S. Sims and Nicos S. Martys: Modelling the Rheological Properties of Concrete
  7. Petri Nikunen, Mikko Karttunen, and Ilpo Vattulainen: Modelling Liposome formation in biophysics Archived July 22, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  8. Henrich, B.; Cupelli, C.; Moseler, M.; Santer, M. (7 November 2007). "An adhesive DPD wall model for dynamic wetting". Europhysics Letters (EPL). 80 (6): 60004. Bibcode:2007EL.....8060004H. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/80/60004. S2CID   67827072.
  9. Blumers, Ansel; Tang, Yu-Hang; Li, Zhen; Li, Xuejin; Karniadakis, George (August 2017). "GPU-accelerated red blood cells simulations with transport dissipative particle dynamics". Computer Physics Communications. 217: 171–179. arXiv: 1611.06163 . Bibcode:2017CoPhC.217..171B. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.03.016. PMC   5667691 . PMID   29104303.
  10. Tang, Yu-Hang; Li, Zhen; Li, Xuejin; Deng, Mingge; Karniadakis, George (2016). "Non-Equilibrium Dynamics of Vesicles and Micelles by Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers with Double Thermoresponsivity". Macromolecules. 49 (7): 2895–2903. Bibcode:2016MaMol..49.2895T. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00365. S2CID   102266045.
  11. Moeendarbary; et al. (2009). "Dissipative Particle Dynamics: Introduction, Methodology and Complex Fluid Applications - A Review". International Journal of Applied Mechanics. 1 (4): 737–763. Bibcode:2009IJAM....1..737M. doi:10.1142/S1758825109000381. S2CID   50363270.
  12. Dissipative Particle Dynamics: Addressing deficiencies and establishing new frontiers Archived 2010-07-15 at the Wayback Machine , CECAM workshop, July 16–18, 2008, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  13. McDonagh, James; et al. (31 May 2020). "What Can Digitization Do For Formulated Product Innovation and Development". Polymer International. 70 (3): 248–255. doi:10.1002/pi.6056. S2CID   219766018.
  14. McDonagh J. L.; et al. (2019). "Utilizing machine learning for efficient parameterization of coarse grained molecular force fields". Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 59 (10): 4278–4288. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00646. PMID   31549507. S2CID   202745539.
  15. Swope W. C.; et al. (2019). "Challenge to Reconcile Experimental Micellar Properties of the CnEm Nonionic Surfactant Family". The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 123 (7): 1696–1707. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11568. PMID   30657322. S2CID   58626650.
  16. Oviedo; et al. (2013). "Critical micelle concentration of an ammonium salt through DPD simulations using COSMO-RS--based interaction parameters". AIChE Journal. 59 (11): 4413–4423. doi:10.1002/aic.14158.
  17. Ryjkina; et al. (2013). "Molecular Dynamic Computer Simulations of Phase Behavior of Non-Ionic Surfactants". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 41 (6): 983–986. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020315)41:6<983::AID-ANIE983>3.0.CO;2-Y. PMID   12491288.
  18. Johnston; et al. (2016). "Toward a standard protocol for micelle simulation" (PDF). The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 120 (26): 6337–6351. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03075. PMID   27096611.

Available packages

Some available simulation packages that can (also) perform DPD simulations are: