Field-reversed configuration

Last updated
Field-reversed configuration: a toroidal electric current is induced inside a cylindrical plasma, making a poloidal magnetic field, reversed in respect to the direction of an externally applied magnetic field. The resultant high-beta axisymmetric compact toroid is self-confined. Field-Reversed Configuration.svg
Field-reversed configuration: a toroidal electric current is induced inside a cylindrical plasma, making a poloidal magnetic field, reversed in respect to the direction of an externally applied magnetic field. The resultant high-beta axisymmetric compact toroid is self-confined.

A field-reversed configuration (FRC) is a type of plasma device studied as a means of producing nuclear fusion. It confines a plasma on closed magnetic field lines without a central penetration. [1] [2] In an FRC, the plasma has the form of a self-stable torus, similar to a smoke ring.

Contents

FRCs are closely related to another self-stable magnetic confinement fusion device, the spheromak. Both are considered part of the compact toroid class of fusion devices. FRCs normally have a plasma that is more elongated than spheromaks, having the overall shape of a hollowed out sausage rather than the roughly spherical spheromak.

FRCs were a major area of research in the 1960s and into the 1970s, but had problems scaling up into practical fusion triple products (target combinations of density, temperature and confinement time). Interest returned in the 1990s and as of 2019, FRCs were an active research area.

History

The FRC was first observed in laboratories in the late 1950s during theta pinch experiments with a reversed background magnetic field. [3] The original idea was attributed to the Greek scientist and engineer Nicholas C. Christofilos who developed the concept of E-layers for the Astron fusion reactor. [4]

The first studies were at the United States Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in the 1960s. Considerable data were collected, with over 600 published papers. [5] Almost all research was conducted during Project Sherwood at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) from 1975 to 1990, [6] and during 18 years at the Redmond Plasma Physics Laboratory of the University of Washington, [7] with the large s experiment (LSX). [8]

Later research was at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), [9] the Fusion Technology Institute (FTI) of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, [10] Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, [11] and the University of California, Irvine. [12]

Private companies now study FRCs for electricity generation, including General Fusion, TAE Technologies, and Helion Energy. [13]

The Electrodeless Lorentz Force Thruster (ELF) developed by MSNW was an attempt to design a space propulsion device. [14] ELF was a candidate in NASA's NextSTEP advanced electric propulsion program, along with the X-3 Nested-Channel Hall Thruster and VASIMR [15] before MSNW dissolved.

Applications

The primary application is for fusion power generation.

The FRC is also considered for deep space exploration, not only as a possible nuclear energy source, but as means of accelerating a propellant to high levels of specific impulse (Isp) for electrically powered spaceships and fusion rockets, with interest expressed by NASA. [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

Comparisons

The Difference Between an FRC and a Spheromak A comparison of an FRC and A Spheromak.png
The Difference Between an FRC and a Spheromak

Producing fusion power by confining the plasma with magnetic fields is most effective if the field lines do not penetrate solid surfaces but close on themselves into circles or toroidal surfaces. The mainline confinement concepts of tokamak and stellarator do this in a toroidal chamber, which allows a great deal of control over the magnetic configuration, but requires a very complex construction. The field-reversed configuration offers an alternative in that the field lines are closed, providing good confinement, but the chamber is cylindrical, allowing simpler, easier construction and maintenance. [21]

Field-reversed configurations and spheromaks are together known as compact toroids. Spheromaks and FRC differ in that a spheromak has an extra toroidal field. This toroidal field can run along the same or opposite direction as the spinning plasma. [22] In the spheromak the strength of the toroidal magnetic field is similar to that of the poloidal field. By contrast, the FRC has little to no toroidal field component and is confined solely by a poloidal field. The lack of a toroidal field means that the FRC has no magnetic helicity and that it has a high beta. The high beta makes the FRC attractive as a fusion reactor and well-suited to aneutronic fuels because of the low required magnetic field. Spheromaks have β ≈ 0.1 whereas a typical FRC has β ≈ 1. [23] [24]

Formation

The Dimensions of an FRC, including the S-parameter. Info-graphic on the Field Reversed Configuration.png
The Dimensions of an FRC, including the S-parameter.

In modern FRC experiments, the plasma current that reverses the magnetic field can be induced in a variety of ways.

When a field-reversed configuration is formed using the theta-pinch (or inductive electric field) method, a cylindrical coil first produces an axial magnetic field. Then the gas is pre-ionized, which "freezes in" the bias field from a magnetohydrodynamic standpoint, finally the axial field is reversed, hence "field-reversed configuration." At the ends, reconnection of the bias field and the main field occurs, producing closed field lines. The main field is raised further, compressing and heating the plasma and providing a vacuum field between the plasma and the wall. [25]

Neutral beams are known to drive current in Tokamaks [26] by directly injecting charged particles. FRCs can also be formed, sustained, and heated by application of neutral beams. [24] [27] In such experiments, as above, a cylindrical coil produces a uniform axial magnetic field and gas is introduced and ionized, creating a background plasma. Neutral particles are then injected into the plasma. They ionize and the heavier, positively-charged particles form a current ring which reverses the magnetic field.

Spheromaks are FRC-like configurations with finite toroidal magnetic field. FRCs have been formed through the merging of spheromaks of opposite and canceling toroidal field. [28]

Rotating magnetic fields have also been used to drive current. [29] In such experiments, as above, gas is ionized and an axial magnetic field is produced. A rotating magnetic field is produced by external magnetic coils perpendicular to the axis of the machine, and the direction of this field is rotated about the axis. When the rotation frequency is between the ion and electron gyro-frequencies, the electrons in the plasma co-rotate with the magnetic field (are "dragged"), producing current and reversing the magnetic field. More recently, so-called odd parity rotating magnetic fields [30] [31] have been used to preserve the closed topology of the FRC. It was analytically shown that the at a very high critical threshold magnitude of 'odd parity' rotating magnetic field, the axisymmetric equilibrium magnetic field lines loses closure and fundamentally changes field topology. [31]

Single particle orbits

FRC particle trajectory in which a particle starts with cyclotron motion inside the null, transitions to betatron motion, and ends as cyclotron motion outside the null. This motion is in the midplane of the machine. Coils are above and below the figure. Particle Trajectory in an FRC.png
FRC particle trajectory in which a particle starts with cyclotron motion inside the null, transitions to betatron motion, and ends as cyclotron motion outside the null. This motion is in the midplane of the machine. Coils are above and below the figure.

FRCs contain an important and uncommon feature: a "magnetic null," or circular line on which the magnetic field is zero. This is necessarily the case, as inside the null the magnetic field points one direction and outside the null the magnetic field points the opposite direction. Particles far from the null trace closed cyclotron orbits as in other magnetic fusion geometries. Particles which cross the null, however, trace not cyclotron or circular orbits but betatron or figure-eight-like orbits, [32] as the orbit's curvature changes direction when it crosses the magnetic null.

Because the particle's orbits are not cyclotron, models of plasma behavior based on cyclotron motion like magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) are inapplicable in the region around the null. The size of this region is related to the s-parameter, [33] or the ratio of the distance between the null and separatrix, and the thermal ion gyroradius. At high-s, most particles do not cross the null and this effect is negligible. At low-s, ~2, this effect dominates and the FRC is said to be "kinetic" rather than "MHD."

Plasma stability

At low s-parameter, most ions inside an FRC follow large betatron orbits (their average gyroradius is about half the size of the plasma) which are typical in accelerator physics rather than plasma physics. These FRCs are very stable because the plasma is not dominated by usual small gyroradius particles like other thermodynamic equilibrium or nonthermal plasmas. Its behavior is not described by classical magnetohydrodynamics, hence there are no Alfvén waves and almost no MHD instabilities despite their theoretical prediction,[ citation needed ] and it avoids the typical "anomalous transport", i.e. processes in which excess loss of particles or energy occurs. [34] [35] [36]

As of 2000, several remaining instabilities are being studied:

Experiments

Selected field reverse experiments, pre-1988 [5]
YearDeviceLocationDevice length
(meter)		Device diameter
(meter)		B-field
(tesla)		Fill pressure
(pascal)		Confinement
(seconds)		Studied
1959- NRL 0.100.0610.0013.332.E-06Annihilation
1961Scylla I LANL 0.110.055.5011.333.E-06Annihilation
1962Scylla III LANL 0.190.0812.5011.334.E-06Rotation
1962Thetatron Culham 0.210.058.6013.333.E-06Contraction
1962Julich[ clarification needed ]0.100.046.0030.661.E-06Formation, tearing
1963 Culham 0.300.105.006.676.E-06Contraction
19640-PIIGarching[ clarification needed ]0.300.055.3013.331.E-06Tearing, contraction
1965Pharos NRL 1.800.173.008.003.E-05Confinement, rotation
1967Centaur Culham 0.500.192.102.672.E-05Confinement, rotation
1967JuliettaJulich1.280.112.706.672.E-05Tearing
1971E-GGarching0.700.112.806.673.E-05Tearing, rotation
1975BN Kurchatov 0.900.210.450.27 - 1.075.E-05Formation
1979TOR Kurchatov 1.500.301.000.27 - 0.671.E-04Formation
1979FRX-ALASL1.000.250.600.53 - 0.933.E-05Confinement
1981FRX-BLANL1.000.251.301.20 - 6.536.E-05Confinement
1982STP-LNagoya1.500.121.001.203.E-05Rotation
1982NUCTENihon2.000.161.006.E-05Confinement, rotation
1982PIACEOsaka1.000.151.406.E-05Rotation
1983FRX-CLANL2.000.500.800.67 - 2.673.E-04Confinement
1984TRX-1MSNW1.000.251.000.67 -2.002.E-04Formation, confinement
1984CTTXPenn S U0.500.120.4013.334.E-05Confinement
1985HBQMU Wash3.000.220.500.53 - 0.933.E-05Formation
1986OCTOsaka0.600.221.001.E-04Confinement
1986TRX-2STI1.000.241.300.40 - 2.671.E-04Formation, confinement
1987CSSU Wash1.000.450.301.33 - 8.006.E-05Slow formation
1988FRXC/LSMLANL2.000.700.600.27 - 1.335.E-04Formation, confinement
1990LSXSTI/MSNW5.000.900.800.27 - 0.67Stability, confinement
Selected field reverse configurations, 1988 - 2011 [44]
DeviceInstitutionDevice typeElectron densityMax ion or electronFRC diameterLength/diameter
1020 / Meter3Temperature [eV][Meter]
Spheromak-3Tokyo UniversityMerging spheromak5.0 – 10.020 – 1000.401.0
Spheromak-4Tokyo UniversityMerging spheromak10 – 401.20 - 1.400.5 – 0.7
Compact Torus Exp-III Nihon University Theta-pinch5.0 – 400.0200 – 3000.10 - 0.405.0 – 10.0
Field-Reversed Exp Liner Los Alamos Theta-pinch1,500.0 – 2,500.0200 – 7000.03 - 0.057.0 – 10.0
FRC Injection Exp Osaka University Translation trapping3.0 – 5.0200 – 3000.30 - 0.407.0 – 15.0
Swarthmore Spheromak ExpSwarthmoreMerging spheromak10020 – 400.401.5
Magnetic Reconnection ExpPrinceton (PPPL)Merging spheromak5.0 – 20.0301.000.3 – 0.7
Princeton field-reversed configuration experiment (PFRC)Princeton (PPPL)Rotating B-field0.05 – 0.3200 – 3000.06
Translation Confinement Sustainment University of Washington Rotating B-field0.1 – 2.525 – 500.70 - 0.74
Translation Confinement Sustainment-Upgrade University of Washington Rotating B-field0.4 – 1.550 – 2000.70 - 0.741.5 – 3.0
Plasma Liner CompressionMSNWTranslation trapping0.20
Inductive Plasma AcceleratorMSNWMerging collision23.0 – 26.03500.20
Inductive Plasma Accelerator-CMSNWMerging compression300.01200 - 20000.210.0
Colorado FRC University of Colorado Merging spheromak
Irvine Field Reverse Configuration UC Irvine Coaxial source150.0100.60
C-2 Tri Alpha Energy, Inc. Merging collision5.0 – 10.0200 – 5000.60 - 0.803.0 – 5.0
STX University of Washington Rotating B-field0.5400.46
Prairie View Rotamak Prairie View A&MRotating B-field0.110-300.42

Spacecraft propulsion

Field-reversed configuration devices have been considered for spacecraft propulsion. By angling the walls of the device outward, the plasmoid can be accelerated in the axial direction and out of the device, generating thrust.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plasma stability</span> Degree to which disturbing a plasma system at equilibrium will destabilize it

In plasma physics, plasma stability concerns the stability properties of a plasma in equilibrium and its behavior under small perturbations. The stability of the system determines if the perturbations will grow, oscillate, or be damped out. It is an important consideration in topics such as nuclear fusion and astrophysical plasma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fusion power</span> Electricity generation through nuclear fusion

Fusion power is a proposed form of power generation that would generate electricity by using heat from nuclear fusion reactions. In a fusion process, two lighter atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, while releasing energy. Devices designed to harness this energy are known as fusion reactors. Research into fusion reactors began in the 1940s, but as of 2024, no device has reached net power, although net positive reactions have been achieved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magnetic confinement fusion</span> Approach to controlled thermonuclear fusion using magnetic fields

Magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) is an approach to generate thermonuclear fusion power that uses magnetic fields to confine fusion fuel in the form of a plasma. Magnetic confinement is one of two major branches of controlled fusion research, along with inertial confinement fusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spheromak</span>

A spheromak is an arrangement of plasma formed into a toroidal shape similar to a smoke ring. The spheromak contains large internal electric currents and their associated magnetic fields arranged so the magnetohydrodynamic forces within the spheromak are nearly balanced, resulting in long-lived (microsecond) confinement times without external fields. Spheromaks belong to a type of plasma configuration referred to as the compact toroids. A spheromak can be made and sustained using magnetic flux injection, leading to a dynomak.

The Enormous Toroidal Plasma Device (ETPD) is an experimental physics device housed at the Basic Plasma Science Facility at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). It previously operated as the Electric Tokamak (ET) between 1999 and 2006 and was noted for being the world's largest tokamak before being decommissioned due to the lack of support and funding. The machine was renamed to ETPD in 2009. At present, the machine is undergoing upgrades to be re-purposed into a general laboratory for experimental plasma physics research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendelstein 7-X</span> Modern stellarator for plasma fusion experiments

The Wendelstein 7-X reactor is an experimental stellarator built in Greifswald, Germany, by the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP), and completed in October 2015. Its purpose is to advance stellarator technology: though this experimental reactor will not produce electricity, it is used to evaluate the main components of a future fusion power plant; it was developed based on the predecessor Wendelstein 7-AS experimental reactor.

Compact toroids are a class of toroidal plasma configurations that are self-stable, and whose configuration does not require magnet coils running through the center of the toroid. They are studied primarily in the field of fusion energy, where the lack of complex magnets and a simple geometry may allow the construction of dramatically simpler and less expensive fusion reactors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spherical tokamak</span> Fusion power device

A spherical tokamak is a type of fusion power device based on the tokamak principle. It is notable for its very narrow profile, or aspect ratio. A traditional tokamak has a toroidal confinement area that gives it an overall shape similar to a donut, complete with a large hole in the middle. The spherical tokamak reduces the size of the hole as much as possible, resulting in a plasma shape that is almost spherical, often compared to a cored apple. The spherical tokamak is sometimes referred to as a spherical torus and often shortened to ST.

A plasma railgun is a linear accelerator which, like a projectile railgun, uses two long parallel electrodes to accelerate a "sliding short" armature. However, in a plasma railgun, the armature and ejected projectile consists of plasma, or hot, ionized, gas-like particles, instead of a solid slug of material. Scientific plasma railguns are typically operated in vacuum and not at air pressure. They are of value because they produce muzzle velocities of up to several hundreds of kilometers per second. Because of this, these devices have applications in magnetic confinement fusion (MCF), magneto-inertial fusion (MIF), high energy density physics research (HEDP), laboratory astrophysics, and as a plasma propulsion engine for spacecraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divertor</span> Magnetic confinement fusion device component

In magnetic confinement fusion, a divertor or diverted configuration is a magnetic field configuration of a tokamak or a stellarator which separates the confined plasma from the material surface of the device. The plasma particles which diffuse across the boundary of the confined region are diverted by the open, wall-intersecting magnetic field lines to wall structures which are called the divertor targets, usually remote from the confined plasma. The magnetic divertor extracts heat and ash produced by the fusion reaction, minimizes plasma contamination, and protects the surrounding walls from thermal and neutronic loads.

TAE Technologies, formerly Tri Alpha Energy, is an American company based in Foothill Ranch, California developing aneutronic fusion power. The company's design relies on an advanced beam-driven field-reversed configuration (FRC), which combines features from accelerator physics and other fusion concepts in a unique fashion, and is optimized for hydrogen-boron fuel, also known as proton-boron or p-11B. It regularly publishes theoretical and experimental results in academic journals with hundreds of publications and posters at scientific conferences and in a research library hosting these articles on its website. TAE has developed five generations of original fusion platforms with a sixth currently in development. It aims to manufacture a prototype commercial fusion reactor by 2030.

Norman Rostoker was a Canadian plasma physicist known for being a pioneer in developing clean plasma-based fusion energy. He co-founded TAE Technologies in 1998 and held 27 U.S. Patents on plasma-based fusion accelerators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Princeton field-reversed configuration</span>

The Princeton field-reversed configuration (PFRC) is a series of experiments in plasma physics, an experimental program to evaluate a configuration for a fusion power reactor, at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL). The experiment probes the dynamics of long-pulse, collisionless, low s-parameter field-reversed configurations (FRCs) formed with odd-parity rotating magnetic fields. FRCs are the evolution of the Greek engineer's Nicholas C. Christofilos original idea of E-layers which he developed for the Astron fusion reactor. The PFRC program aims to experimentally verify the physics predictions that such configurations are globally stable and have transport levels comparable with classical magnetic diffusion. It also aims to apply this technology to the Direct Fusion Drive concept for spacecraft propulsion.

The Prairie View (PV) Rotamak is a plasma physics experiment at Prairie View A&M University. The experiment studies magnetic plasma confinement to support controlled nuclear fusion experiments. Specifically, the PV Rotamak can be used as either a spherical tokamak or a field-reversed configuration. Some time between 2015 and 2017, most personnel moved on to advanced career opportunities. In 2017, a Final Report to Department of Energy (DOE) was prepared and submitted by Dr. Saganti of PVAMU on the entire research work supported by DOE for 12 years.

The Star Thrust Experiment (STX) was a plasma physics experiment at the University of Washington's Redmond Plasma Physics Laboratory which ran from 1999 to 2001. The experiment studied magnetic plasma confinement to support controlled nuclear fusion experiments. Specifically, STX pioneered the possibility of forming a Field-reversed configuration (FRC) by using a Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendelstein 7-AS</span> Stellarator for plasma fusion experiments (1988-2002)

Wendelstein 7-AS was an experimental stellarator which was in operation from 1988 to 2002 by the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (IPP) in Garching. It was the first of a new class of advanced stellarators with modular coils, designed with the goal of developing a nuclear fusion reactor to generate electricity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tokamak Chauffage Alfvén Brésilien</span> Tokamak at the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

The Tokamak Chauffage Alfvén Brésilien (TCABR) is a tokamak situated at the University of Sao Paulo (USP), Brazil. TCABR is the largest tokamak in the southern hemisphere and one of the magnetic-confinement devices committed to advancing scientific knowledge in fusion power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omnigeneity</span> A concept in stellarator physics

Omnigeneity is a property of a magnetic field inside a magnetic confinement fusion reactor. Such a magnetic field is called omnigenous if the path a single particle takes does not drift radially inwards or outwards on average. A particle is then confined to stay on a flux surface. All tokamaks are exactly omnigenous by virtue of their axisymmetry, and conversely an unoptimized stellarator is generally not omnigenous.

Low to High Confinement Mode Transition, more commonly referred to as L-H transition, is a phenomenon in the fields of plasma physics and magnetic confinement fusion, signifying the transition from less efficient plasma confinement to highly efficient modes. The L-H transition, a milestone in the development of nuclear fusion, enables the confinement of high-temperature plasmas. The transition is dependent on many factors such as density, magnetic field strength, heating method, plasma fueling, and edge plasma control, and is made possible through mechanisms such as edge turbulence, E×B shear, edge electric field, and edge current and plasma flow. Researchers studying this field use tools such as Electron Cyclotron Emission, Thomson Scattering, magnetic diagnostics, and Langmuir probes to gauge the PLH and seek to lower this value. This confinement is a necessary condition for sustaining the fusion reactions, which involve the combination of atomic nuclei, leading to the release of vast amounts of energy.

References

  1. ↑ Freidberg, Jeffrey P. (2007). Plasma Physics and Fusion Energy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-85107-7.
  2. ↑ Freidberg, Jeffrey P. (2015). Plasma Physics and Fusion Energy (DJVU). Cambridge University Press. p. 335. Retrieved 13 May 2023– via Internet Archive.
  3. ↑ Kolb, A.C.; Dobbie, C.B.; Griem, H.R. (1 July 1959). "Field mixing and associated neutron production in a plasma". Physical Review Letters. 3 (1). The original idea was attributed to the Greek scientist and engineer Nicholas C. Christofilos.: 5–7. Bibcode:1959PhRvL...3....5K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.5.(subscription required)
  4. ↑ Reinders, L. J. (2021). The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 83. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64344-7. ISBN   978-3-030-64343-0. S2CID   241339825.
  5. 1 2 Tuszewski, M. (November 1988). "Field reversed configurations". Nuclear Fusion . 28 (11): 2033. doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/28/11/008 . S2CID   122791237.
  6. ↑ McKenna KF, Armstrong WT, Barnes DC, Bartsch RR, Chrien RE, Cochrane JC, Klingner PL, Hugrass WN, Linford RK, Rej DJ, Schwarzmeier JL, Sherwood EG, Siemon RE, Spencer RL, Tuszewski M (1985). "Field-reversed configuration research at Los Alamos". Nuclear Fusion . 25 (9): 1317. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/25/9/057. S2CID   122374822.
  7. ↑ "Web page of the Redmond Plasma Physics Laboratory". Archived from the original on 2015-02-19.
  8. ↑ Hoffman, Alan L.; Carey, Larry L.; Crawford, Edward A.; Harding, Dennis G.; DeHart, Terence E.; McDonald, Kenneth F.; McNeil, John L.; Milroy, Richard D.; Slough, John T.; Maqueda, Ricardo; Wurden, Glen A. (March 1993). "The Large-s Field-Reversed Configuration Experiment". Fusion Science and Technology. 23 (2): 185–207. Bibcode:1993FuTec..23..185H. doi:10.13182/FST93-A30147. OSTI   6514222.
  9. ↑ Kirtley, David; Brown, Daniel L.; Gallimore, Alec D.; Haas, James (June 2005). Details on an AFRL Field Reversed Configuration Plasma Device (PDF) (Technical report). Air Force Research Laboratory.
  10. ↑ "Web page of the Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison". Archived from the original on 2020-05-16. Retrieved 2014-06-08.
  11. ↑ Cohen, Samuel (2012-10-31). "First operation of the PFRC-2 device". Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 57 (12). Bibcode:2012APS..DPPPP8051C.
  12. ↑ Harris, W.S.; Trask, E.; Roche, T.; Garate, E.P.; Heidbrink, W.W.; McWilliams, R. (20 November 2009). "Ion flow measurements and plasma current analysis in the Irvine Field Reversed Configuration" (PDF). Physics of Plasmas. 16 (11). American Institute of Physics: 112509. Bibcode:2009PhPl...16k2509H. doi:10.1063/1.3265961. S2CID   103136706.
  13. ↑ Poddar, Yash (11 March 2014). "Can Startups Make Nuclear Fusion Possible?". Stanford University.
  14. ↑ Pancotti, Anthony. "Testimony before the Space Subcommittee of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology United States House of Representatives Hearing on In-Space Propulsion: Strategic Choices and Options June 29, 2017" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 November 2022. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
  15. ↑ "NASA's NextSTEP Advanced Electric Propulsion Activities" (PDF). NASA. 9 July 2018. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
  16. ↑ Wessel, F. J. (2000). "Colliding beam fusion reactor space propulsion system". AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 504. pp. 1425–1430. doi:10.1063/1.1290961. ISBN   978-1563969195.
  17. ↑ Cheung, A. (2004). "Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor Space Propulsion System". AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 699. pp. 354–361. doi:10.1063/1.1649593.
  18. ↑ Slough, John; Pancotti, Anthony; Pfaff, Michael; Pihl, Christopher; Votroubek, George (November 2012). The Fusion Driven Rocket (PDF). NIAC 2012. Hampton, VA: NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts.
  19. ↑ Slough, John; Pancotti, Anthony; Kirtley, David; Votroubek, George (6–10 October 2013). Electromagnetically Driven Fusion Propulsion (PDF). 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference (IEPC-2013). Washington, D.C.: George Washington University.
  20. ↑ "Nuclear Fusion Rocket Could Reach Mars in 30 Days". Space.com. 10 April 2013.
  21. ↑ Ryzhkov, Sergei V. (2002). "Features of Formation, Confinement and Stability of the Field Reversed Configuration" (PDF). Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. Plasma Physics. 7 (4): 73–75. ISSN   1682-9344.
  22. ↑ Dolan, Thomas. Magnetic Fusion Technology. Vol. 2. New York City: Springer, 2012. Print.
  23. ↑ Ono, Y (1999). "New relaxation of merging spheromaks to a field reversed configuration". Nuclear Fusion. 39 (11Y): 2001–2008. Bibcode:1999NucFu..39.2001O. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/39/11Y/346. S2CID   250871394.
  24. 1 2 Momita Okamoto Nomura (1987). "Advanced Fuels in a Field-Reversed Configuration". Fusion Science and Technology. 11 (2): 436–450. Bibcode:1987FuTec..11..436M. doi:10.13182/FST87-A25020 . Retrieved 2016-01-05.
  25. ↑ Slough, J (2011). "Creation of a high-temperature plasma through merging and compression of supersonic field reversed configuration plasmoids". Nuclear Fusion. 51 (5): 053008. Bibcode:2011NucFu..51e3008S. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053008. S2CID   120579314.
  26. ↑ Taguchi, M (1992-01-01). "Approximate expression for beam driven current in tokamak plasmas". Nuclear Fusion. 32 (1): 143–150. Bibcode:1992NucFu..32..143T. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/32/1/i12. S2CID   250743246.
  27. ↑ Rostoker, N.; Binderbauer, M.; Monkhorst, H. J. (1996-01-01). "Fusion reactors based on colliding beams in a field reversed configuration plasma". Fusion Technology. 30 (3): 1395–1402. Bibcode:1996FuTec..30.1395R. doi:10.13182/FST96-A11963143.
  28. ↑ Ji, H.; Belova, E.; Gerhardt, S. P.; Yamada, M. (2006-12-01). "Recent Advances in the SPIRIT (Self-organized Plasma with Induction, Reconnection, and Injection Techniques) Concept". Journal of Fusion Energy. 26 (1–2): 93–97. Bibcode:2007JFuE...26...93J. doi:10.1007/s10894-006-9043-4. ISSN   0164-0313. S2CID   59377360.
  29. ↑ Jones, Ieuan R. (1999-05-01). "A review of rotating magnetic field current drive and the operation of the rotamak as a field-reversed configuration (Rotamak-FRC) and a spherical tokamak (Rotamak-ST)". Physics of Plasmas. 6 (5): 1950–1957. Bibcode:1999PhPl....6.1950J. doi:10.1063/1.873452. ISSN   1070-664X.
  30. ↑ Glasser, A. H.; Cohen, S. A. (2002-05-01). "Ion and electron acceleration in the field-reversed configuration with an odd-parity rotating magnetic field". Physics of Plasmas. 9 (5): 2093–2102. Bibcode:2002PhPl....9.2093G. doi:10.1063/1.1459456. ISSN   1070-664X.
  31. 1 2 Ahsan, T.; Cohen, S. A. (July 2022). "An analytical approach to evaluating magnetic-field closure and topological changes in FRC devices". Physics of Plasmas. 29 (7): 072507. Bibcode:2022PhPl...29g2507A. doi: 10.1063/5.0090163 . S2CID   251140943.
  32. ↑ Wang, M. Y.; Miley, G. H. (1979-01-01). "Particle orbits in field-reversed mirrors". Nuclear Fusion. 19 (1): 39. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/19/1/005. ISSN   0029-5515. S2CID   120544136.
  33. 1 2 Slough, J. T.; Hoffman, A. L. (1988). "Observation of tilt stability of field reversed configurations at large s". Nuclear Fusion. 28 (6): 1121. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/28/6/016. S2CID   121761596.
  34. ↑ Rostoker, N.; Wessel, F.J.; Rahman, H.U.; Maglich, B.C.; Spivey, B. (22 March 1993). "Magnetic Fusion with High Energy Self-Colliding Ion Beams". Physical Review Letters. 70 (1818): 1818–1821. Bibcode:1993PhRvL..70.1818R. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1818. PMID   10053394. S2CID   32950265.
  35. ↑ Binderbauer, M.W.; Rostoker, N. (December 1996). "Turbulent Transport in Magnetic Confinement: How to Avoid it". Journal of Plasma Physics. 56 (3): 451–465. Bibcode:1996JPlPh..56..451B. doi:10.1017/S0022377800019413. S2CID   122582085.
  36. ↑ Rostoker, N.; Binderbauer, M. W.; Wessel, F. J.; Monkhorst, H. J. Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor (PDF). Invited Paper, Special Session on Advanced Fuels APS-DPP. American Physical Society. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2002-01-26.
  37. ↑ Gerhardt, S. P.; Belova, E.; Inomoto, M.; Yamada, M.; Ji, H.; Ren, Y.; Kuritsyn, A. (2006). "Equilibrium and stability studies of oblate field-reversed configurations in the Magnetic Reconnection Experiment" (PDF). Physics of Plasmas. 13 (11): 112508. Bibcode:2006PhPl...13k2508G. doi:10.1063/1.2360912.
  38. ↑ Omelchenko, Yu. A. (27–29 March 2000). Stabilization of the FRC Tilt Mode by a Self-Generated Toroidal Field (PDF). Sherwood 2000 International Fusion/Plasma Theory Conference. UCLA, Los Angeles, California: General Atomics Fusion Energy Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-12-16.
  39. ↑ Tuszewski, M. (1984). "Experimental study of the equilibrium of field-reversed configurations". Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 26 (8): 991–1005. Bibcode:1984PPCF...26..991T. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/26/8/004. S2CID   250861012.
  40. ↑ Ohi, S.; Minato, T.; Kawakami, Y.; Tanjyo, M.; Okada, S.; Ito, Y.; Kako, M.; Gotô, S.; Ishimura, T.; Itô, H. (1983). "Quadrupole Stabilization of the n=2 Rotational Instability of a Field-Reversed Theta-Pinch Plasma". Physical Review Letters. 51 (12): 1042. Bibcode:1983PhRvL..51.1042O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1042.
  41. ↑ Hoffman, A. L. (1983). "Suppression of the n=2 rotational instability in field-reversed configurations". Physics of Fluids. 26 (6): 1626–1629. Bibcode:1983PhFl...26.1626H. doi:10.1063/1.864298.
  42. ↑ Guo, H.; Hoffman, A.; Milroy, R.; Miller, K.; Votroubek, G. (2005). "Stabilization of Interchange Modes by Rotating Magnetic Fields". Physical Review Letters. 94 (18): 185001. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94r5001G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.185001. PMID   15904379.
  43. ↑ Slough, J.; Miller, K. (2000). "Enhanced Confinement and Stability of a Field-Reversed Configuration with Rotating Magnetic Field Current Drive" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 85 (7): 1444–7. Bibcode:2000PhRvL..85.1444S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1444. PMID   10970525. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-17.
  44. ↑ Steinhauer, Loren C. (July 2011). "Review of field-reversed configurations". Physics of Plasmas. 18 (7): 070501. Bibcode:2011PhPl...18g0501S. doi:10.1063/1.3613680. ISSN   1070-664X.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.