Media bias in South Asia

Last updated

Claims of media bias in South Asia attract constant attention. The question of bias in South Asian media is also of great interest to people living outside of South Asia. Some accusations of media bias are motivated by a disinterested desire for truth, some are politically motivated. Media bias occurs in television, newspapers, school books and other media.

Contents

India

Before Independence

In British India, bias in the media coverage of the Bengal famine of 1943 has been highlighted by historians. Calcutta's two leading English-language newspapers were The Statesman (at that time a British-owned newspaper) [1] and Amrita Bazar Patrika . In the early months of the famine, the government applied pressure on newspapers to "calm public fears about the food supply" [2] and follow the official stance that there was no rice shortage. This effort had some success; The Statesman published editorials asserting that the famine was due solely to speculation and hoarding, while "berating local traders and producers, and praising ministerial efforts." [2] News of the famine was also subject to strict war-time censorship – even use of the word "famine" was prohibited [3]  – leading The Statesman later to remark that the UK government "seems virtually to have withheld from the British public knowledge that there was famine in Bengal at all". [4]

After Independence

During the 1984 anti-Sikh riots where several thousand Sikh civilians were killed in pogroms directed at the community during the reportage of the 1984 riots. It is argued there was a discrepancy between the press release of data and images and the actual severity of the violence occurring in the streets of New Delhi. This use of selective information by the media resulted in the ambiguous portrayal of Sikhs throughout the nation and failed to bring their plight to light. During this time India had passed the National Security Act (1980), the Punjab Disturbed Areas Ordinance (1983), The Armed Forces Special Powers Act (1983) and the Terrorists Affected Areas (Special Courts Act of 1984). These acts provided sweeping powers to the Indian state resulting in skewed coverage of the massacre of Sikhs. [5]

Media Blackouts

Reporters Without Borders condemned the media blackouts regularly imposed in Indian-administered Kashmir during times of unrest the report also stated that journalists were being harassed by local authorities. Furthermore the organization urged Indian government to stop using security and law and order as a pretext for the media blackout. [6]

During the Radia tapes controversy there was an attempted blackout orchestrated by many prominent Indian TV channels and newspapers. However, the news gained prominence following sustained pressure on social networking sites Twitter [7] [8] and Facebook [9] [10] [11] [12] According to The Washington Post , "Twitter has played an important role in launching what has become an international conversation on the issue, with the Indian diaspora weighing in". [13] Initially, only a handful of the mainstream newspapers in India, like The Deccan Herald , [14] Indian Express [15] had openly written about the tapes. Some newspapers like HT Media, Mint (the business newspaper also owned by HT media) [16] and NDTV said "the authenticity of these transcripts cannot be ascertained". [12] [17] CNN-IBN's Sagarika Ghose discussed with a panel of experts, if the corporate lobbying is undermining democracy, on the "Face the Nation" programme on the channel. [18] The Radia tapes has made a dent in the image of the media in the country. [10] [11] [19] [20] [21] [22] "The complete blackout of the Nira Radia tapes by the entire broadcast media and most of the major English newspapers paints a truer picture of corruption in the country," wrote G Sampath, the deputy editor of the Daily News and Analysis (DNA) newspaper. [10] [23] The Deccan Chronicle commented, "The 'Radia tapes' may have torn the veil off the nexus between information hungry journalists, lobbyists and industrialists, and opened everyone’s eyes to what has long been suspected — the ability of a small but powerful group to use their connections to influence policy." [24] The largest circulated English newspaper in India and the world, The Times of India finally opened up on 25 November 2010, commenting "The people are showing who the boss is. The weapon in their hands is the internet, ... has seen frantic activism against "power brokering" by journalists in collusion with corporate groups and top government politicians..." [25] OPEN and Outlook reported that journalists Barkha Dutt (editor of NDTV) and Vir Sanghvi (editorial director of the Hindustan Times ) knew that corporate lobbyist Nira Radia influenced Raja's appointment as telecom minister, [26] publicising Radia's phone conversations with Dutt and Sanghvi [27] [28] when Radia's phone was tapped by the Income Tax Department. According to critics, Dutt and Sanghvi knew about the link between the government and the media industry but delayed reporting the corruption. [26]

Criticism

Arun Shourie and others have criticized "biased Marxist influences" in the media, as well as alleged corruption of Marxist historians, particularly during the time when they controlled the ICHR. These claims include the allegation that the history of the Islamic invasion has been whitewashed and censored in Indian school-books and in other media. [29] [30]

Reporters Without Borders said that India is at 133rd of 180 countries in the 2016 World Press Freedom Index, due to the number of journalists killed, impunity for crimes of violence committed against journalists, reprisals by corrupt officials against liberal and outspoken media, police brutality, communal hatred instigation by biased media, misprinting stories, and many more. [31] [32]


False News

Fake news in India has been spread by both the official media outlets, and in social media.[ citation needed ]

Pakistan

A prevalent culture of self- and state-censorship in the media’s coverage of sensitive issues has also been criticized, particularly in matters related to religion, blasphemy laws, and the Pakistan Army. The urban bias in Pakistani media has been criticized by Amir Rana, director of the Institute for Peace Studies: “There is little space [in our media] not only for alternative ideas or narratives but also for issues of a common citizen. The narratives that we have seen in the mainstream media in Pakistan are basically controlled by three media centers in Pakistan: Islamabad, Karachi, and Lahore. There is little space in the mainstream media for views, perspectives, and information from other parts of Pakistan.” [33]

Sri Lanka

The government of Sri Lanka has been accused of controlling the media. Measures like the Public Security Ordinance and the Sixth Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitution have been accused of limiting a reporters freedom.

The Sixth Amendment to Sri Lanka's constitution, inserted as Article 157A, has been accused of threatening civic disability and seizing of property by banning promotion of separatism. The Public Security Ordinance (PSO) law is often applied liberally when the government applies emergency regulations. This is quite often as Sri Lanka has been ruled under Emergency for a cumulative total of over 20 years since it gained independence from the British. The Saturday Review, the English paper published in Jaffna and the Aththa, the Communist Sinhala language daily were banned in the early eighties under the PSO. When the Aththa was banned its press was also sealed. In the seventies, the government sealed the printing press of the Independent Newspapers Ltd. (Davasa Group) by using the emergency regulations.

Under the Emergency Regulations (E.R), all material relating to a subject specified in a gazetted presidential proclamation, has to be submitted for censoring by a 'competent authority.' The 'competent authority' is usually politically favoured civil servant. Recently, the regime made history by appointing a military officer as the government censor. Material censored under such provisions has included comment on the high cost of living, on the dismissal of an employee of a state corporation, allegedly for an article he wrote for his trade union journal, on the marketing problems of passion fruit growers, criticism of a minister's statement in Parliament about a public corporation, and a reference to an alleged assault on two civilians.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arun Shourie</span> Indian economist, journalist and politician (born 1941)

Arun Shourie is an Indian economist, journalist, author and politician. He has worked as an economist with the World Bank, a consultant to the Planning Commission of India, editor of the Indian Express and The Times of India and a Minister of Communications and Information Technology in the Vajpayee Ministry (1998–2004). He was awarded the Ramon Magsaysay Award in 1982 and the Padma Bhushan in 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kasur</span> City in Punjab, Pakistan

Kasur is a city to the south of Lahore, in the Pakistani province of Punjab. The city serves as the headquarters of Kasur District. Kasur is the 16th largest city in Punjab and 24th largest in Pakistan, by population. It is also known for being the burial place of the 17th-century Sufi-poet Bulleh Shah. It is farther west of the border with neighboring India, and bordered to Lahore, Sheikhupura and Okara Districts of Punjab. The city is an aggregation of 26 fortified hamlets overlooking the alluvial valleys of the Beas and Sutlej rivers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radcliffe Line</span> Boundary of the Partition of India

The Radcliffe Line was the boundary demarcated between the Indian and Pakistani portions of the Punjab Province and Bengal Presidency of British India. It was named after Cyril Radcliffe, who, as the joint chairman of the two boundary commissions for the two provinces, had the ultimate responsibility to equitably divide 175,000 square miles (450,000 km2) of territory with 88 million people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bengal famine of 1943</span> Famine in British India during World War II

The Bengal famine of 1943 was an anthropogenic famine in the Bengal province of British India during World War II. An estimated 2.1–3 million people died, in the Bengal region, from starvation, malaria and other diseases aggravated by malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions and lack of health care. Millions were impoverished as the crisis overwhelmed large segments of the economy and catastrophically disrupted the social fabric. Eventually, families disintegrated; men sold their small farms and left home to look for work or to join the British Indian Army, and women and children became homeless migrants, often travelling to Calcutta or other large cities in search of organised relief.

Vir Sanghvi is an Indian print and television journalist, author, columnist and talk show host. He has been a member of many professional, academic and government bodies including the National Integration Council. Currently, he is a member of the Broadcast Content Complaint Council (BCCC), a body that regulates content on entertainment TV channels and Co-Founder/Lead Food Critic at EazyDiner. He is an opponent of the Hindutva ideology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vinod Mehta</span> Indian journalist, editor and political commentator

Vinod Mehta was an Indian journalist, editor and political commentator. He was also the founder editor-in-chief of Outlook from 1995 to 2012 and had been editor of publications such as The Pioneer, The Sunday Observer, The Independent and The Indian Post. He was also the author of several books.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Famine in India</span> Phenomenon of famines in the Indian subcontinent

Famine had been a recurrent feature of life in the South Asian subcontinent countries of India and Bangladesh, most notoriously under British rule. Famines in India resulted in millions of deaths over the course of the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries. Famines in British India were severe enough to have a substantial impact on the long-term population growth of the country in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barkha Dutt</span> Indian television journalist and author

Barkha Dutt is an Indian television journalist and author. She has been a reporter and news anchor at NDTV and Tiranga TV. She currently runs her own digital news channel called 'MoJo Story'. She is also an opinion columnist with The Hindustan Times and The Washington Post.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NDTV 24x7</span> Television channel in New Delhi, India

NDTV 24x7 is a 24-hour English-language television news channel based in New Delhi, India.

Anti-Indian sentiment, a form of racism against Asians, also known as Indophobia or anti-Indianism, includes negative feelings, like hatred and disgust towards the Republic of India and Indian culture. Indophobia, in the context of anti-Indian prejudice, is "a tendency to react negatively towards people of Indian extraction, against aspects of Indian culture and normative habits". Its opposite is Indomania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sikhism in India</span> Overview of the presence and role of Sikhism in India

Indian Sikhs number approximately 21 million people and account for 1.7% of India's population as of 2011, forming the country's fourth-largest religious group. The majority of the nation's Sikhs live in the northern state of Punjab, which is the only Sikh-majority administrative division in the world.

Public relations is a term that refers to the management of communications between an entity such as an organization or a celebrity, and stakeholders, internal or external, such as investors, employees, communities, customers or clients. It is concerned with reputation building, and is often considered to be a subset to marketing, advertising, or corporate communications.

The Radia tapes controversy relates to the telephonic conversations between Niira Radia, a political lobbyist in India, the (then) Indian telecom minister A. Raja, and senior journalists, politicians, and corporate houses, taped by the Indian Income Tax Department in 2008–09. The tapes were leaked out to the press, and were eventually published by some media outlets and shown by television channels.

Niira Radia is a former corporate lobbyist whose taped telephone conversations implicated her influence in the allocation of key ministries in the Government of India in 2009. Discussion of the tapes resulted in the "Radia tapes controversy", which was a media event that led to the uncovering of the alleged 2G spectrum scam involving former telecommunications minister A Raja. These events led to Raja's resignation and later acquittal by Special CBI court, and Radia's departure from corporate lobbying.

Online journalism in India is a growing field shared between traditional media and the growing blogging community. Large media companies, traditionally print and television focused, continue to dominate the journalism environment now online but a growing group of dedicated bloggers are providing an independent voice.

The Kashmiris in Punjab are ethnic Kashmiris who have historically migrated from the Kashmir Valley and settled in the Punjab region. Many ethnic Muslim Kashmiris from the Kashmir Valley had migrated to the Punjab region during Sikh and Dogra rule.

Swati Chaturvedi is an Indian journalist. She has worked for various Indian newspapers and channels, like The Statesman, The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, The Tribune, NDTV, DailyO, The Wire,Gulf News and Deccan Herald. She has also published two books; her first book is Daddy's Girl; her second book is titled I am a Troll: Inside the Secret World of the BJP's Digital Army. Swati Chaturvedi won the Prize for Courage, in 2018, awarded by Reporters Without Borders for journalism in a hostile environment.

Ian Melville Stephens was a British journalist who was the editor of the Indian newspaper The Statesman in Kolkata, West Bengal, from 1942 to 1951. He became known for his independent reporting during British rule in India, and in particular for his decision to publish graphic photographs, in August 1943, of the Bengal famine of 1943, which claimed between 1.5 and 3 million lives. The publication of the images, along with Stephens' editorials, helped to bring the famine to an end by persuading the British government to supply adequate relief to the victims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Media coverage of the 1943 Bengal famine</span>

The Bengal famine of 1943-44 was a major famine in the Bengal province in British India during World War II. An estimated 2.1 million, out of a population of 60.3 million, died from starvation, malaria and other diseases aggravated by malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions, and lack of health care. Millions were impoverished as the crisis overwhelmed large segments of the economy and social fabric.

References

  1. ↑ A. Sen 1977; Ó Gráda 2015, p. 42.
  2. 1 2 Ó Gráda 2015, p. 4.
  3. ↑ J. Mukherjee 2015, p. 125.
  4. ↑ Ó Gráda 2015,  p. 57, citing "Consequences of Untruth," Statesman, 12 October 1943.
  5. ↑ Ahmed, Saifuddin (22 August 2010). "The Role of the Media During Communal Riots in India: A Study of the 1984 Sikh Riots and the 2002 Gujarat Riots". SSRN   2399847.
  6. ↑ "RSF condemns Kashmir media blackout by Indian authorities | Reporters without borders". 21 July 2016.
  7. ↑ "#barkhagate: Protests in 140 characters leave no space for gray areas". DNA . 24 November 2010.
  8. ↑ "Twitter world abuzz over Radia-Barkha tapes". rediff.com . Mynews.in. Archived from the original on 21 November 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  9. ↑ "Barkhagate". Facebook. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  10. 1 2 3 G Sampath (20 November 2010). "When Radia killed the media star". Daily News and Analysis . Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  11. 1 2 "Those living in glass houses..." The Hindu Business Line. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  12. 1 2 "2G scam: Netizens bark at Barkha, Vir Sanghvi". CIOL. 22 November 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  13. ↑ Emily Wax (22 November 2010). "Indian journalists accused of secretly helping politicians, businesses". The Washington Post . Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  14. ↑ "Anchored in mire : Journalists are only expected to be witnesses.". The Deccan Herald . 23 November 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  15. ↑ Gautam Datt (20 November 2010). "Radia tapes featuring senior scribes create stir". The Indian Express . Express Buzz. Retrieved 23 November 2010.[ permanent dead link ]
  16. ↑ Sukumar Ranganathan (19 November 2010). "Editor's note: Why we are quiet on the Open magazine story". Mint . Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  17. ↑ "NDTV on defamatory remarks against Barkha Dutt". NDTV. 18 November 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  18. ↑ "FTN: Is corporate lobbying undermining democracy?". CNN-IBN . 22 November 2010. Archived from the original on 26 November 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  19. ↑ "Outrage as Nira Radia tapes dent image of 4th Estate". India Today . 20 November 2010.
  20. ↑ Lahiri, Tripti (23 November 2010). "Q&A: The State of Indian Journalism". The Wall Street Journal.
  21. ↑ "Oh what a lovely blackout". The Hoot.
  22. ↑ "Companies love to pamper senior journalists". Mail Today. India Today.
  23. ↑ Betwa Sharma (20 November 2010). "Indian Media Where Art Thou on Media Scandal". The Huffington Post . Retrieved 23 November 2010.
  24. ↑ Neena Gopal (21 November 2010). "Billions for a few, few for the billions". The Deccan Chronicle. Archived from the original on 23 November 2010. Retrieved 18 September 2018.
  25. ↑ "2G scam sideshow: Netizens lambast high-profile journalists". The Times of India . 25 November 2010. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013.
  26. 1 2 Sharma, Amol (1 December 2010). "Wait a Minute, What Exactly Is Barkha Dutt Accused of?". IndiaRealTime. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  27. ↑ "Barkha Dutt : 'What Do You Want Me To Tell Them (The Congress)? Tell Me. I'll talk To Them.'". Outlook.
  28. ↑ "Vir Singhvi : 'Who Do You Want Congress To Talk To? Karunanidhi? I'll Speak To Ahmed Patel.'". Outlook.
  29. ↑ Bryant, E. E. (2014). Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate. Cary, USA: Oxford University Press, USA.
  30. ↑ Shourie, A. (2014). Eminent historians: Their technology, their line, their fraud. HarperCollins
  31. ↑ "Classement mondial de la liberté de la presse 2020 | Reporters sans frontières".
  32. ↑ Jha, Fiza (2020-04-21). "'Pressure to toe Hindutva line' sees India drop to 142 on World Press Freedom Index". ThePrint. Retrieved 2020-05-31.
  33. ↑ Yusuf, Huma. "Mapping digital media: Pakistan." Open Society Foundations (2013).

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.