Proto-Turkic language

Last updated

Proto-Turkic
Reconstruction of Turkic languages
RegionProbably the eastern part of Central Asia, [1] possibly including regions of East Asia and western Siberia [1]
Erac.3000 – c.500 BCE [2] [3]
Lower-order reconstructions

Proto-Turkic is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Turkic languages that was spoken by the Proto-Turks before their divergence into the various Turkic peoples. Proto-Turkic separated into Oghur (western) and Common Turkic (eastern) branches. Candidates for the proto-Turkic homeland range from western Central Asia to Manchuria, [4] with most scholars agreeing that it lay in the eastern part of the Central Asian steppe, [5] while one author has postulated that Proto-Turkic originated 2,500 years ago in East Asia. [6]

Contents

The oldest records of a Turkic language, the Old Turkic Orkhon inscriptions of the 7th century Göktürk khaganate, already shows characteristics of Eastern Common Turkic. For a long time, the reconstruction of Proto-Turkic relied on comparisons of Old Turkic with early sources of the Western Common Turkic branches, such as Oghuz and Kypchak, as well as the Western Oghur proper (Bulgar, Chuvash, Khazar). Because early attestation of these non-easternmost languages is much more sparse, reconstruction of Proto-Turkic still rests fundamentally on the easternmost Old Turkic of the Göktürks, however it now also includes a more comprehensive analysis of all written and spoken forms of the language. [7]

The Proto-Turkic language shows evidence of influence from several neighboring language groups, including Eastern Iranian, Tocharian, and Old Chinese. [8]

Phonology

Consonants

The consonant system had a two-way contrast of stop consonants (fortis vs. lenis), k, p, t vs. g, b, d. There was also an affricate consonant, ç; at least one sibilant s and sonorants m, n, ń, ŋ, r, l with a full series of nasal consonants. Some scholars additionally reconstruct the palatalized sounds ĺ and ŕ for the correspondence sets Oghuric /l/ ~ Common Turkic *š and Oghuric /r/ ~ Common Turkic *z. Most scholars, however, assume that these are the regular reflexes of Proto-Turkic *l and *r. [9] Oghuric is thus sometimes referred to as Lir-Turkic and Common Turkic as Shaz-Turkic.

A glottochronological reconstruction based on analysis of isoglosses and Sinicisms points to the timing of the r/z split at around 56 BCE–48 CE. As Anna Dybo puts it, that may be associated with

the historical situation that can be seen in the history of the Huns' division onto the Northern and Southern [groups]: the first separation and withdrawal of the Northern Huns to the west has occurred, as was stated above, in 56 BC,... the second split of the (Eastern) Huns into the northern and southern groups happened in 48 AD. [10]

Dybo suggests that during that period, the Northern branch steadily migrated from Western Mongolia through Southern Xinjiang into the north's Dzungaria and then finally into Kazakhstan's Zhetysu until the 5th century. [10]

There was no fortis-lenis contrast in word-initial position: the initial stops were always *b, *t, *k, the affricate was always () and the sibilant was always *s. In addition, the nasals and the liquids did not occur in that position either. [11]

Bilabial Dental or
alveolar
Palatal Velar
Plosive and
affricate
fortis*p*t/t͡ʃ/*k
lenis*b*d*g
Sibilant *s
Nasal *m*n//
Liquid lateral *l(*ĺ //)
rhotic *r(*ŕ //)
Semivowel *j

Like in many modern Turkic languages, the velars /k/, /g/, and possibly /ŋ/ seem to have had back and front allophones ([ k ] and [ q ], [ g ] and [ ɢ ], [ ŋ ] and [ ɴ ]) according to their environments, with the velar allophones occurring in words with front vowels, and uvular allophones occurring in words with back vowels. The lenis stops /b/, /d/ and /g/~/ɢ/ may have tended towards fricatives intervocalically. [12]

Vowels

Like most of its descendants, Proto-Turkic exhibited vowel harmony, distinguishing vowel qualities a, ï, o, u vs. ä, e, i, ö, ü, as well as two vowel quantities. Here, macrons represent long vowels. Some scholars (e.g. Gerhard Doerfer) additionally reconstruct a mid back unrounded based on cognate sets with Chuvash, Tuvan and Yakut ï corresponding to a in all other Turkic languages, although these correspondences can also be explained as deriving from *a which underwent subsequent sound changes in those three languages. [13] [14] The phonemicity of the distinction between the two close unrounded vowels, i.e. front *i and back , is also rejected by some. [14]

frontback
unroundedroundedunroundedrounded
high*i, *ī /i/*ü, *ǖ /y/*ï, *ï̄ /ɯ/*u, *ū /u/
mid*e, *ē /e/*ö, *ȫ /ø/~/œ/(*ë, *ë̄ /ɤ/)*o, *ō /o/
low*ä, *ǟ /ɛ/*a, *ā /a/

Morphology

Nouns

Plural of nouns are formed by the suffix *-lAr, however, the Chuvash plural -sem <-сем> seems to be a late replacement. Reconstructable possessive suffixes in Proto-Turkic includes 1sg*-m, 2sg*-ŋ, and 3sg*-(s)i, plurals of the possessors are formed by *-z in Common Turkic languages.

Verbs

The reconstructable suffixes for the verbs include:

Proto-Turkic also involves derivation with grammatical voice suffixes, as in cooperative *körüš, middle *körün, passive *körül, and causative *körtkür.

Vocabulary

Pronouns

Proto-TurkicTurkishAzeriTurkmenKazakhChuvashKarakhanidUzbekUyghurBashkirKyrgyzSakha (Yakut)
I*bë, [15] [16] *bän- [17] [18] ben, ban-mənmenmen, ma-e-pĕ, man-men, man-menmenminmenmin
you*së, [15] [19] *sän-sen, san-sənsensen, sa-, size-sĕ, san-sen, san-sen, sizsen, sizhinsen, sizen
he/she/it*an-, *o-lon-, oon-, oolon-, o-lun-, vălan-, oluuulalkini, ol [20]
we*bïŕbizbizbizbizpir-bizbizbizbeðbizbihigi
you (plural)*sïŕsizsizsizsender, sizdersir-sizsizlarsenler, siler, sizlerheðsiler, sizderehigi
they*o-lar [21] on-laronlarolarolarvĕsem, vĕsen-olarularularularalarkiniler, ollor

Numbers

Proto-TurkicOghur TurkicCommon Turkic
Volga BulgarChuvashKarakhanidTurkishAzeriTurkmenKazakhUzbekUyghurBashkirKyrgyzSakha (Yakut)
1*bï̄rبىر (bīr)pĕrbīrbirbirbirbirbirbirberbirbiir
2*ëkïاَكِ (eki)ikĕikkīikiikiikiekiikkiikkiikeekiikki
3*üçوج (več)viśĕüčüçüçüçüşuchüçösüčüs
4*dȫrtتُوات (tüvet)tăvatătȫrtdörtdörddörttörtto'rttörtdürttörttüört
5*bë̄ĺ(k)بيال (byel)pilĕkbḗšbeşbeşbäşbesbeshbeşbişbeşbies
6*altıاَلطِ (altï)ultăaltï̄altıaltıaltyaltıoltialtealtıaltıalta
7*jëtïجىَاتِ (čyeti)śičĕyétīyediyeddiýedijetiyettiyettiyetejetisette
8*säkïŕڛَكِڔ (sekir)sakărsekizsekizsəkkizsekizsegizsakkizsekkizhigeðsegizаğıs
9*tokuŕطُخِڔ (tuxïr)tăhărtokūzdokuzdoqquzdokuztoğızto'qqiztoqquztuğıðtoguztoğus
10*ōnوان (van)vunōnonononono'nonunonuon
20*jëgïrmïجِيِرم (čiyirim)śirĕmyegirmīyirmiiyirmiýigrimijıyırmayigirmayigrimeyegermejıyırmasüürbe
30*otuŕوطر (vutur)văḍărottuzotuzotuzotuzotızo'ttizottuzutıðotuzotut
40*kırkحرح (xïrïx)hĕrĕhkïrkkırkqırxkyrkqırıqqirqqiriqqırqkırk-
50*ällïgاَلُّ (ellü)allăelligelliəlliellieliwellikellikilleelüü-
60*ältmıĺ-utmălaltmïšaltmışaltmışaltmyşalpısoltmishatmişaltmışaltımış-
70*jëtmïĺ-śitmĕlyetmišyetmişyetmişýetmişjetpisyetmishetmişyetmeşjetimiş-
80*säkïŕ ōnسكر وان (sekir van)sakărvunseksȫnseksensəksənsegsenseksensaksonseksenhikhänseksenağıs uon
90*tokuŕ ōnطوخر وان (toxïr van)tăhărvuntoksōndoksandoxsandogsantoqsanto'qsontoqsantuqhantoksontoğus uon
100*jǖŕجُور (čǖr)śĕryǖzyüzyüzýüzjüzyuzyüzyöðjüzsüüs
1000*bıŋ-pinmiŋbinminmüňmıñmingmiñmeñmiñmuñ

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Altaic languages</span> Hypothetical language family of Eurasia

Altaic is a controversial proposed language family that would include the Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic language families and possibly also the Japonic and Koreanic languages. The hypothetical language family has long been rejected by most comparative linguists, although it continues to be supported by a small but stable scholarly minority. Speakers of the constituent languages are currently scattered over most of Asia north of 35° N and in some eastern parts of Europe, extending in longitude from the Balkan Peninsula to Japan. The group is named after the Altai mountain range in the center of Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkic languages</span> Language family of Eurasia

The Turkic languages are a language family of more than 35 documented languages, spoken by the Turkic peoples of Eurasia from Eastern Europe and Southern Europe to Central Asia, East Asia, North Asia (Siberia), and West Asia. The Turkic languages originated in a region of East Asia spanning from Mongolia to Northwest China, where Proto-Turkic is thought to have been spoken, from where they expanded to Central Asia and farther west during the first millennium. They are characterized as a dialect continuum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ural-Altaic languages</span> Abandoned language family proposal

Ural-Altaic, Uralo-Altaic, Uraltaic, or Turanic is a linguistic convergence zone and abandoned language-family proposal uniting the Uralic and the Altaic languages. It is now generally agreed that even the Altaic languages do not share a common descent: the similarities between Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic are better explained by diffusion and borrowing. Just as in Altaic, the internal structure of the Uralic family has been debated since the family was first proposed. Doubts about the validity of most or all of the proposed higher-order Uralic branchings are becoming more common. The term continues to be used for the central Eurasian typological, grammatical and lexical convergence zone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongolic languages</span> Language family of Eurasia

The Mongolic languages are a language family spoken by the Mongolic peoples in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, North Asia and East Asia, mostly in Mongolia and surrounding areas and in Kalmykia and Buryatia. The best-known member of this language family, Mongolian, is the primary language of most of the residents of Mongolia and the Mongol residents of Inner Mongolia, with an estimated 5.7+ million speakers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bashkir language</span> Turkic language of the Kipchak sub-branch

Bashkir or Bashkort is a Turkic language belonging to the Kipchak branch. It is co-official with Russian in Bashkortostan. It is spoken by 1.09 million native speakers in Russia, as well as in Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Estonia and other neighboring post-Soviet states, and among the Bashkir diaspora. It has three dialect groups: Southern, Eastern and Northwestern.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Volga Bulgaria</span> 900s–1200s Bulgar state on the Volga River

Volga Bulgaria or Volga–Kama Bulgaria was a historical Bulgar state that existed between the 9th and 13th centuries around the confluence of the Volga and Kama River, in what is now European Russia. Volga Bulgaria was a multi-ethnic state with large numbers of Bulgars, Finno-Ugrians, Varangians and East Slavs. Its strategic position allowed it to create a local trade monopoly with Norse, Cumans, and Pannonian Avars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chuvash people</span> Turkic people of Eastern Europe and Central Asia

The Chuvash people, plural: чӑвашсем, çăvaşsem; Russian: чува́ши ) are a Turkic ethnic group, a branch of the Ogurs, native to an area stretching from the Idel-Ural (Volga-Ural) region to Siberia.

Bulgar is an extinct Oghuric Turkic language spoken by the Bulgars.

Chuvash is a Turkic language spoken in European Russia, primarily in the Chuvash Republic and adjacent areas. It is the only surviving member of the Oghur branch of Turkic languages, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qashqai language</span> Oghuz Turkic language of southwestern Iran

Qashqai is an Oghuz Turkic language spoken by the Qashqai people, an ethnic group living mainly in the Fars Province of Southern Iran. Encyclopædia Iranica regards Qashqai as an independent third group of dialects within the Southwestern Turkic language group. It is known to speakers as Turki. Estimates of the number of Qashqai speakers vary. Ethnologue gave a figure of 1.0 million in 2021.

The Onoghurs, Onoğurs, or Oğurs were Turkic nomadic equestrians who flourished in the Pontic–Caspian steppe and the Volga region between 5th and 7th century, and spoke the Oghuric language.

Old Siberian Turkic, generally known as East Old Turkic and often shortened to Old Turkic, was a Siberian Turkic language spoken around East Turkistan and Mongolia. It was first discovered in inscriptions originating from the Second Turkic Khaganate, and later the Uyghur Khaganate, making it the earliest attested Common Turkic language. In terms of the datability of extant written sources, the period of Old Turkic can be dated from slightly before 720 AD to the Mongol invasions of the 13th century. Old Turkic can generally be split into two dialects, the earlier Orkhon Turkic and the later Old Uyghur. There is a difference of opinion among linguists with regard to the Karakhanid language, some classify it as another dialect of East Old Turkic, while others prefer to include Karakhanid among Middle Turkic languages; nonetheless, Karakhanid is very close to Old Uyghur. East Old Turkic and West Old Turkic together comprise the Old Turkic proper, though West Old Turkic is generally unattested and is mostly reconstructed through words loaned through Hungarian. East Old Turkic is the oldest attested member of the Siberian Turkic branch of Turkic languages, and several of its now-archaic grammatical as well as lexical features are extant in the modern Yellow Uyghur, Lop Nur Uyghur and Khalaj ; Khalaj, for instance, has (surprisingly) retained a considerable number of archaic Old Turkic words despite forming a language island within Central Iran and being heavily influenced by Persian. Old Uyghur is not a direct ancestor of the modern Uyghur language, but rather the Western Yugur language; the contemporaneous ancestor of Modern Uyghur was the Chagatai literary language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elteber</span>

An elteber was a client king of an autonomous but tributary tribe or polity in the hierarchy of the Turkic khaganates including Khazar Khaganate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Khalaj language</span> Turkic language spoken in western Iran

Khalaj is a Turkic language spoken in Iran. Although it contains many old Turkic elements, it has become widely Persianized. Khalaj has about 150 words of uncertain origin.

The Oghuric, Onoguric or Oguric languages are a branch of the Turkic language family. The only extant member of the group is the Chuvash language. The first to branch off from the Turkic family, the Oghuric languages show significant divergence from other Turkic languages, which all share a later common ancestor. Languages from this family were spoken in some nomadic tribal confederations, such as those of the Onogurs or Ogurs, Bulgars and Khazars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anna Dybo</span> Russian linguist

Anna Vladimirovna Dybo is a Russian linguist, member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and co-author of the Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages (2003), which encompasses some 3,000 Proto-Altaic stems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yakut language</span> Siberian Turkic language

Yakutyə-KOOT, also known as Yakutian, Sakha, Saqa or Saxa, is a Turkic language belonging to Siberian Turkic branch and spoken by around 450,000 native speakers, primarily the ethnic Yakuts and one of the official languages of Sakha (Yakutia), a federal republic in the Russian Federation.

This article covers the phonology of the Uyghur language. Uyghur, a Turkic language spoken primarily in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region features both vowel harmony and vowel reduction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Slavic language</span> Proto-language of all the Slavic languages

Proto-Slavic is the unattested, reconstructed proto-language of all Slavic languages. It represents Slavic speech approximately from the 2nd millennium BC through the 6th century AD. As with most other proto-languages, no attested writings have been found; scholars have reconstructed the language by applying the comparative method to all the attested Slavic languages and by taking into account other Indo-European languages.

<i>Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages</i> Dictionary of the hypothetical Altaic language family

The Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages is a comparative and etymological dictionary of the hypothetical Altaic language family. It was written by linguists Sergei Starostin, Anna Dybo, and Oleg Mudrak, and was published in Leiden in 2003 by Brill Publishers. It contains 3 volumes, and is a part of the Handbook of Oriental Studies: Section 8, Uralic and Central Asian Studies; no. 8.

References

  1. 1 2 Robbeets & Savelyev 2017, p. 127.
  2. The Turkic Languages Lars Johanson, Éva Á. Csató · 2015
  3. The Turks in World History Carter V. Findley · 2005, p.17
  4. Yunusbayev, Bayazit; Metspalu, Mait; Metspalu, Ene; Valeev, Albert (21 April 2015). "The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads across Eurasia". PLOS Genetics. 11 (4): e1005068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005068 . ISSN   1553-7404. PMC   4405460 . PMID   25898006. "The origin and early dispersal history of the Turkic peoples is disputed, with candidates for their ancient homeland ranging from the Transcaspian steppe to Manchuria in Northeast Asia."
  5. Robbeets, Martine; Savelyev, Alexander (21 December 2017). Language Dispersal Beyond Farming. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 127. ISBN   978-90-272-6464-0. "It is generally agreed among historians and linguists that the starting point of the Turkic migrations was located in the eastern part of the Central Asian steppe (see, e.g., Golden 1992, Kljastornyj & Suktanov 2009; Menges 1995:55). Turkologists use various definitions for describing the Proto-Turkic homeland, but most indicate more or less the same region. While Janhunen (1996:26, 2015:293) locates the Proto-Turkic homeland fairly precisely in Eastern Mongolia, Rona-Tas (1998:88), in a rather general manner, places the last habitat of the Turkic speakers before the disintegration of the family "in west and central Siberia and in the region south of it." The latter localization overlaps in large part with that proposed by Tenisev et al. (2006), who associate the Proto-Turkic urheimat with the vast area stretching from the Ordos Desert in Inner Mongolia to the foothils of the Sayan-Altai mountains in Southern Siberia."
  6. Janhunen, Juha (2013). "Personal pronouns in Core Altaic". In Martine Irma Robbeets; Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). Shared Grammaticalization: With special focus on the Transeurasian languages. John Benjamins. p. 223. ISBN   9789027205995.
  7. Róna-Tas 1998, pp. 69.
  8. Róna-Tas 1998, pp. 78.
  9. Róna-Tas 1998, pp. 71–72.
  10. 1 2 Dybo, A. V. (2007). Chronology of Turkic languages and linguistic contacts of early Turks (PDF) (in Russian). Moscow. p. 770. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-03-11.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  11. Róna-Tas 1998, p. 71.
  12. Johanson 1998, p. 97.
  13. Róna-Tas 1998, p. 70.
  14. 1 2 Johanson 1998, pp. 90–91.
  15. 1 2 Georg, Stefan (2004-12-22). "Review of Starostin, Dybo, Mudrak, Gruntov & Glumov (2003): Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages". Diachronica. 21 (2): 445–450. doi:10.1075/dia.21.2.12geo. ISSN   0176-4225.
  16. "Turkic etymology : Query result". starling.rinet.ru. Retrieved 2021-09-23.
  17. "Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/ben", Wiktionary, 2021-08-20, retrieved 2021-09-23
  18. "Proto-Turkic/Pronouns and numbers - Wikibooks, open books for an open world". en.wikibooks.org. Retrieved 2021-09-23.
  19. "Turkic etymology : Query result". starling.rinet.ru. Retrieved 2021-09-23.
  20. In Sakha (AKA Yakut), kini(ler) is used for animate referents whereas ol(lor) is used for inanimate referents. While the latter is cognate with other third person forms given here, the former descends from Proto-Turkic *gëntü, *këntü '(him/her)self' and is thus cognate, for example, with Turkish kendi.
  21. This pronoun are constructed by adding a plural suffix to *o-l "he/she/it". However, an Oghur language Chuvash uses a completely different plural suffix that lacks vowel harmony, -sem. According to Róna-Tas (1998), -sem is a late replacement to *-lAr.

Sources

Further reading