August 2023 Second Thomas Shoal standoff

Last updated

August 2023 Second Thomas Shoal standoff
Part of South China Sea disputes
CCGV 5305 fires water cannon at BRP Malabrigo - August 2023.jpg
CCG 5305 fires a water cannon at BRP Malabrigo
Date5 August 2023
Location
Belligerents
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  China
Units involved

Flag of the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG).svg Philippine Coast Guard

Flag of the Philippine Navy.svg  Philippine Navy

China Coast Guard racing stripe.svg China Coast Guard [1]

  • CCG 3302
  • CCG 4203
  • CCG 5201
  • CCG 5304
  • CCG 5305
  • CCG 5402
Strength
2 patrol vessels
2 wooden supply boats
6 cutters
Casualties and losses
4 military injured
2 vessels damage

On August 5, 2023, a China Coast Guard ship blocked a Philippine Coast Guard ship en route to the Philippine-occupied Second Thomas Shoal in the disputed Spratly Islands.

Contents

Background

The Second Thomas Shoal (named Ren'ai Jiao by China; Ayungin Shoal by the Philippines) is part of the Spratly Islands which is disputed territory claimed in full or in part by multiple countries including China and the Philippines in the South China Sea. The sea itself is claimed by China under its nine-dash map line claim. [2]

Second Thomas Shoal is occupied by the Philippines, which intentionally grounded the Philippine Navy ship BRP Sierra Madre on the shoal in 1999. [2]

Incident

Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) video showing a China Coast Guard ship firing its water cannon towards a PCG ship

On August 5, 2023, the Philippine Coast Guard and the Philippine Navy were heading to the Second Thomas Shoal to conduct what it describes as a routine resupply mission for personnel aboard the BRP Sierra Madre marooned at the feature. The mission involved two wooden boats of the Philippine Navy; Unaizah May 1 (UM1) and Unaizah May 2 escorted by the Coast Guard's BRP Malabrigo and BRP Cabra. The Navy purposely uses civilian-type ships for the resupply to avoid sending a "wrong message" that the mission is of military nature. [3]

The China Coast Guard (CCG) has impended the Philippine ships. UM1 was able to provide provisions for Filipino personnel aboard Sierra Madre after successfully outmaneuvering a CCG ship. UM2 was deterred by another CCG ship which fired water cannons towards it. The CCG were allegedly backed by Chinese maritime militia vessels. [3]

China claims that the Philippines is sending construction materials to reinforce Sierra Madre, an activity which it considers as illegal. [4]

Reactions

China Foreign Ministry

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi urged the Philippines to work with China to resolve the South China Sea dispute in response to the Second Thomas Shoal incident. The Chinese foreign ministry has also tried to dissuade the United States from interfering in the territorial dispute. [5] [6]

International

The United States reaffirmed its commitment to its alliance with the Philippines in response to the incident. Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and the European Union also issued statements condemning China. [7]

Aftermath

Claims against Filipino diplomats

The Department of Foreign Affairs supposedly issued a memorandum ordering the recall of Jose Manuel Romualdez, Ambassador of the Philippines to the United States due to bribery and corruption allegations from an anonymous complaint. Foreign Secretary Enrique Manalo denied such order exists and Romualdez claimed that China is launching a smear campaign to damage Philippine–United States relations. [8]

Alleged Philippine promise

On August 8, 2023, China brought up an alleged explicit promise made by the Philippines to remove Sierra Madre from the Second Thomas Shoal. [4] [9]

The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) of the Philippines insists that the grounded ship shall remain a "permanent station". [9] On August 9, President Bongbong Marcos issued a statement that he is "not aware of any such arrangement or agreement" while adding that if such exist, that he rescind such agreement. [10]

In response to request to show proof of such agreement, China said that there is no point in doing so following the rescission. [11]

On August 14, 2023, [12] Manila Times columnist Rigoberto Tiglao claimed that the alleged pledge was indeed made albeit "solely verbal". Tiglao wrote that such pledge was referenced in several documents including confidential official memoranda from the DFA. [13]

Senators Jinggoy Estrada and JV Ejercito said that there was no such deal made during the administration of their father Joseph Estrada. [14] The former had prior recent correspondence with Orly Mercado who was the Defense Secretary during the Estrada presidency. [15] He also pointed out that the promise is "illogical" given that President Estrada himself instructed the Armed Forces of the Philippines to ground Sierra Madre as a move for the Philippines to assert its claim over the feature. He challenged China to name the specific Filipino official who made the supposed pledge. [16]

Former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo also categorically denied making any such promise during her administration. [17]

The National Security Council insist that China is using "political operators" to undermine the Philippines' position on the South China Sea dispute, naming the alleged promise as one of China's methods of "psychological warfare" to sway Filipino public opinion on the matter. [18]

Vietnam

Three Filipino critics on China's territorial claims were supposedly requested in July to publish material against Vietnam regarding the Southeast Asian country's alleged militarization of the South China Sea. The three are Jay Batongbacal (UP Institute of Maritime Affairs and the Law of the Sea head), Antonio Carpio (Retired Supreme Court Justice), and Renato De Castro (De La Salle University international studies professor). Batongbacal speculated that its part of China's "divide and conquer" strategy, Carpio said its meant to redirect the Filipinos' negative sentiment against China to Vietnam. The three were allegedly promised to be compensated. [18]

Other media outlets were also approached and requested to write critical material against Vietnam. [18]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippine Navy</span> Naval warfare branch of the Armed Forces of the Philippines

The Philippine Navy (PN) is the naval warfare service branch of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. It has an estimated strength of 24,500 active service personnel, including the 10,300-strong Philippine Marine Corps. It operates 82 combat vessels, 14 auxiliary vessels, 25 manned aircraft and 8 unmanned aerial vehicles. Tracing its roots from the Philippine Revolutionary Navy on May 20, 1898, while its modern foundations were created during the creation of the Offshore Patrol in February 9, 1939, the PN is currently responsible for naval warfare operations and maritime patrol missions within the Philippine Waters, as well as ensuring the protection of the Philippine's maritime interests, including the West Philippine Sea and Benham Rise.

BRP <i>Benguet</i> Phillippine Navy landing ship

BRP Benguet (LS-507) is a LST-542-class tank landing ship currently serving the Philippine Navy.

BRP <i>Sierra Madre</i> US/Philippine Navy tank landing ship

USS LST-821, renamed USS Harnett County (LST-821/AGP-281), is an LST-542-class tank landing ship built for the United States Navy during World War II. She was named for Harnett County, North Carolina and was the only U.S. Naval vessel to bear the name. She served the United States Navy in World War II and the Vietnam War. She was transferred to South Vietnam's Republic of Vietnam Navy, which named her RVNS My Tho (HQ-800).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippines and the Spratly Islands</span> Philippine policies, actions and history in the Spratly Islands

Philippines and the Spratly Islands – this article discusses the policies, activities and history of the Republic of the Philippines in the Spratly Islands from the Philippine perspective. Non-Philippine viewpoints regarding Philippine occupation of several islands are currently not included in this article.

The Scarborough Shoal standoff is a dispute between the Philippines and the People's Republic of China over the Scarborough Shoal. Tensions began on April 8, 2012, after the attempted apprehension by the Philippine Navy of eight mainland Chinese fishing vessels near the shoal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Half Moon Shoal</span>

Half Moon Shoal, also known as Bànyuè Jiāo and Hasa Hasa Shoal, is an atoll at the eastern edge of the Spratly Islands of the South China Sea. China, the Philippines, Taiwan (ROC) and Vietnam have competing claims over the atoll. It is located close to Northeast Investigator Shoal and 100 km from Palawan, Philippines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Thomas Shoal</span> Attoll in the South China Sea

Second Thomas Shoal, also known as Ayungin Shoal, Bãi Cỏ Mây (Vietnamese) and Rén'ài Jiāo, is a submerged reef in the Spratly Islands of the South China Sea, 105 nautical miles west of Palawan, Philippines. It is a disputed territory and claimed by several nations. The reef is occupied by Philippine Navy personnel aboard ship, the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57), that was intentionally grounded on the reef in 1999 and has been periodically replenished since then.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sabina Shoal</span> Atoll of Spratly Islands in South China Sea

Sabina Shoal, also known as Escoda Shoal ; Mandarin Chinese: 仙賓礁/仙宾礁; pinyin: Xiānbīn Jiāo; Vietnamese: Bãi Sa Bin, is an atoll in the NE of Dangerous Ground in the Spratly Islands. The Philippines puts it under the jurisdiction of Brgy. Pag-asa, Kalayaan, Palawan. It is also claimed by the People's Republic of China, and the Republic of China (Taiwan) and Vietnam.

BRP <i>Tarlac</i> (LD-601) Philippine Navy landing platform ship

BRP Tarlac (LD-601) is the lead ship of her class of landing platform docks in service with the Philippine Navy. She is the second ship to be named after the Philippine province of Tarlac, one of the provinces considered to have significant involvement in the Philippine Revolution of independence against Spain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of the South China Sea dispute</span>

The article covers events that are related to the South China Sea dispute. In the South China Sea, historically China, Japan and France have disputed over Spratly and Paracel Islands. Presently, the Paracel Islands are disputed among China (PRC), Taiwan (ROC), and Vietnam, while Pratas Island is contested between China and Taiwan. Additionally, the Spratly Islands are subject to intertwined claims by China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei. Because of this, numerous countries with territorial disputes have had conflicts in the South China Sea since the past.

BRP <i>Gregorio del Pilar</i> (PS-15)

BRP Gregorio del Pilar (PS-15) is the lead ship of her class of offshore patrol vessel of the Philippine Navy. She is the second ship to be named after Gregorio del Pilar, a Filipino revolutionary general known for his role at the Battle of Tirad Pass. She was originally designated as "PF-15" from 2012 to mid-2016. Then the Navy adopted a new code designation system and she was redesignated as "FF-15". In February 2019, the Navy downgraded the status of the entire class from frigate to patrol ship and redesignated her to "PS-15".

BRP <i>Tubbataha</i> (MRRV-4401)

BRP Tubbataha (MRRV-4401) is the lead ship of the Parola-class patrol vessels of the Philippine Coast Guard, and is one of the newer additions to the agency's fleet.

BRP <i>Malabrigo</i> (MRRV-4402)

BRP Malabrigo (MRRV-4402) is the second ship of the Parola-class patrol vessels of the Philippine Coast Guard.

BRP <i>Malapascua</i> (MRRV-4403)

BRP Malapascua (MRRV-4403) is the third ship of the Parola-class patrol vessels of the Philippine Coast Guard.

BRP <i>Sindangan</i> (MRRV-4407)

BRP Sindangan (MRRV-4407) is the sixth ship of the Parola-class patrol vessels of the Philippine Coast Guard.

BRP <i>Bagacay</i> (MRRV-4410)

BRP Bagacay (MRRV-4410) is the ninth ship of the Parola-class patrol vessels of the Philippine Coast Guard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 Reed Bank incident</span>

The 2019 Reed Bank incident occurred when F/B Gem-Ver, a Philippine fishing boat anchored in Reed Bank in the South China Sea, sank after it was rammed by a Chinese vessel, Yuemaobinyu 42212, during the early morning hours of 9 June 2019. The stricken vessel's crew was later rescued by a Vietnamese fishing vessel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Thomas Shoal laser incident</span>

On February 6, 2023, the China Coast Guard and Philippine Coast Guard had an encounter near the Second Thomas Shoal, one of the features of the Spratly Islands which is subject to a wider dispute in the South China Sea.

The Atin Ito Christmas convoy is a civilian-led mission to deliver donated goods to Filipino troops stationed in the Spratly Islands, a feature claimed by several countries including the Philippines and China. The Atin Ito Coalition is an organization which supports the Philippines' sovereignty claims in the South China Sea.

References

  1. "VIDEO: China Coast Guard Blast Philippine Military Resupply with Water Cannons". USNI News. August 7, 2023.
  2. 1 2 "What's behind rising China-Philippines tensions in the South China Sea?". Al Jazeera. August 9, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  3. 1 2 Mangosing, Frances (August 12, 2023). "Eyewitness to cat and (wet) mouse game in WPS". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  4. 1 2 "China urges the Philippines to tow away military vessel "grounded" at Ren'ai Jiao-Xinhua". Xinhua. August 8, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  5. "China calls on Philippines to jointly seek effective way to control situation in South China Sea-Xinhua". Xinhua. August 8, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  6. "China urges U.S. to stop utilizing South China Sea issue to sow discord-Xinhua". Xinhua. August 7, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  7. Nakamura, Ryo (August 9, 2023). "U.S. vows to defend Philippine boats in South China Sea". Nikkei Asia. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  8. Lazaro, Jacob (August 19, 2023). "Romualdez: We confirm smear job vs PH envoys". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  9. 1 2 Nepomuceno, Priam; Rocamora, Joyce Ann (August 8, 2023). "PH to China: Sierra Madre 'permanent station' in Ayungin Shoal". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  10. Ul Khaliq, Riyaz (August 9, 2023). "Philippines' Marcos says will rescind any agreement with China on rusting ship in South China Sea". Anadolu Agency. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  11. Nodalo, Tristan (August 11, 2023). "China says no point in showing proof of Ayungin Shoal deal if Marcos already rescinded it". CNN Philippines. Archived from the original on August 14, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  12. Tiglao, Rigoberto (August 14, 2023). "PH did promise to remove BRP Sierra Madre from Ayungin". The Manila Times. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  13. "Estrada camp: 'Illogical' for Erap to vow BRP Sierra Madre removal". GMA News. August 14, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  14. Torregoza, Hannah (August 14, 2023). "Jinggoy, JV: 'Erap' made no promise to remove BRP Sierra Madre". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
  15. "Sen. Estrada: No deal to remove BRP Sierra Madre during my father's presidency". CNN Philippines. August 14, 2023. Archived from the original on August 14, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  16. "Sen. Estrada dares China to reveal who made promise about leaving Ayungin". ABS-CBN News. August 14, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
  17. Cabalza, Dexter; Aurelio, Julie M. (August 20, 2023). "Arroyo: I never promised to remove BRP Sierra Madre". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  18. 1 2 3 Mangosing, Frances (August 18, 2023). "China using 'operators' to divide PH on WPS — NSC". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved August 20, 2023.