Goods and Services Tax (Singapore)

Last updated

Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Singapore is a value added tax (VAT) of 9% levied on import of goods, as well as most supplies of goods and services. Exemptions are given for the sales and leases of residential properties, importation and local supply of investment precious metals and most financial services. [1] Export of goods and international services are zero-rated. GST is also absorbed by the government for public healthcare services, such as at public hospitals and polyclinics.

Contents

Background

Prior to 1986, Singapore's corporate income tax rate and top marginal personal income tax rate both stood at 40%. Such high rates were deemed to be uncompetitive. On the recommendation of the 1986 Economic Committee, the Singapore Government decided that it needed to shift from direct to indirect taxes, to maintain its international competitiveness in attracting investments, and to sustain its economic growth to create well-paying jobs for Singaporeans. [2]

Implementation

GST was implemented at a single rate of 3% on 1 April 1994, with an assurance that it would not be raised for at least five years. To cushion the impact of GST on Singaporean households, an offset package was also introduced. Simultaneously, corporate tax rate was cut by 3% to 27%, and the top marginal personal income tax rate was cut by 3% to 30%. The initial GST rate of 3% was among the lowest in the world, as the focus was not to generate substantial revenue, but to allow people to get adjusted to the tax. [3]

In 2002, the Economic Review Committee reviewed Singapore's tax policy, and recommended that further tax reform was necessary to bring in new investments. The committee noted that other countries were aggressively cutting their direct tax rates to attract internationally mobile capital and labour, and recommended that the government rely more on GST for its tax revenues, while again cushioning the impact on Singaporean households through an offset package. [4]

The government accepted the committee's recommendations. The GST rate was increased from 3% to 4% on 1 January 2003, and to 5% on 1 January 2004. Each increase was accompanied by an offset package that was designed to make the average Singaporean household overall better off, even after accounting for the additional costs imposed by the increase in GST rates. Direct tax rates were also reduced correspondingly. [5]

GST increase to 7%

On 15 February 2007 (Budget Day), then Second Minister for Finance Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced that the GST rate would be increased to 7% with effect from 1 July 2007.

The rate increase was accompanied by an offset package to help Singaporeans with the increase in GST. The package would cost the government $4 billion over five years. [6] The government argued that the offset package would help the majority of Singaporeans offset their increased GST costs for several years. The offset package consisted of direct transfer benefits, in the form of cash payouts (GST credits, growth dividends, senior citizens' bonuses), CPF top-ups (post-secondary education account top-ups for students, Medisave top-ups for older Singaporeans), and rebates (on utilities and public housing service & conservancy charges). [7] Those who earned less or lived in smaller homes received more benefits. [8] The government also argued that the Workfare Income Supplement, a wage subsidy, would provide significant support for lower-income workers on a continuing basis even after the GST offsets have been distributed. [9]

The government also cut direct tax rates, continuing its practice of lowering direct tax rates since 1986. [10] As of 2010, the top marginal rates for corporate tax stood at 17% and personal income tax at 20%, with effective rates being much lower.

As a gesture of goodwill, and to assist lower-income groups, several supermarket chains absorbed the 2% increase in GST, ranging for a period of one month to six months. They included Cold Storage, Giant Hypermarket, NTUC FairPrice and Sheng Siong. Besides FairPrice, NTUC also absorbed the 2% increase on NTUC Foodfare, NTUC Childcare, NTUC LearningHub, NTUC Club and NTUC Healthcare, for six months.

GST on digital services

On 19 February 2018 (Budget Day), Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat announced that GST will be imposed on imported digital services, which took effect on 1 January 2020. The change ensures that local and overseas services are fairly treated in the tax system. [11]

Committee Against GST Profiteering (CAP)

The Committee Against GST Profiteering (CAP) was set up in 1994 to investigate complaints and feedback on profiteering or unjustified price increases using GST increases as an excuse. [12]

GST increase to 9%

The GST is planned to be increased from 7% to 9% sometime between 2021 and 2025. The primary justification for the rise is to accrue funds for future infrastructure projects and renovation of the existing infrastructure. Increased social spending to help cope with an increasingly ageing population has also been given as a secondary reason. [13] In view of uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the GST increase [14] will be deferred to after year 2022, with a S$6 billion Assurance Package proposed in 2020 to cushion the impact when the hike kicks in. The GST increase is later deferred again, with the increase taking place in two stages, 8% on 1 January 2023 and 9% on 1 January 2024. The government will also add S$640 million to the S$6 billion Assurance Package to help cushion the impact of the GST hike. [15] [16] Since then, the Government plans to increase the Assurance Package by $1.4 billion due to inflation, bringing the total to $8.040 billion. The GST was eventually announced by Finance Minister Lawrence Wong during Budget 2022 (18 February 2022) to be increased in 2 phases, one percentage point each time on 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2024. [17]

GST on imported low-value goods

On 16 February 2021 (Budget Day), Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat announced that GST will be imposed on imported low-value goods brought in via air and sea transport, which took effect on 1 January 2023, ensuring that local and overseas providers are treated fairly. [18]

Reception

Tax progressivity

As of 2018, 174 of the 193 countries with full UN membership employ a GST/VAT, including all OECD members except the United States. [lower-alpha 1] As with all other countries that has GST/VAT in place, critics consider the idea to be a regressive tax, meaning the poor pay more, as a percentage of their income, than the rich. However, defenders contend that GST can be considered a proportional tax if tax payments are expressed as a percentage not of income, but of lifetime consumption; savings and investments are tax-deferred, and when converted to consumption are subjected to GST. Others point out that the more important question to ask is not whether GST is regressive, but whether GST is more regressive than the alternative indirect taxes, namely, sales, excise and turnover tax (not income tax because that is a direct tax). In addition, they argue that what affects poverty and fairness is not the impact of any particular tax, but the impact of the tax structure as a whole, and how tax revenues are redistributed. When GST is combined with progressive taxes, and the revenues distributed to the poor, the total fiscal structure can be progressive. [19]

To maintain the progressive nature of total taxes and transfers on individuals, Singapore reduced income tax on lower-income earners, as well as instituted direct transfer payments to lower-income groups, resulting in an overall lower tax burden for most Singaporean households. These offsets included lower income taxes, lower property taxes, rebates on rental and service & conservancy charges for public housing, and additional subsidies for health, education and community services. As a result of the income tax cuts, additional tax reliefs and rebates in 1994, about 70% of individuals that used to pay income taxes no longer needed to do so. [20]

The Singapore government has argued that the GST [21] on its own is a flat tax, but that it is part of an overall fiscal system that is highly progressive: higher-income earners pay the highest fraction of their income in taxes, and also spend more. When all taxes were taken into account (income tax, property tax, GST and other indirect taxes), the top 10% of households accounted for 38% of the taxes paid, while the top 20% contributed 53% of all taxes. [22] In contrast, lower-income earners receive substantially more transfers than the taxes they pay. [23] Low- and middle-income households effectively pay 'negative' tax. From 2006 to 2010, the second bottom decile of Singaporean households (ranked by income from work) received transfers (net of all taxes paid) amounting to 23% of their income, the 5th decile received transfers that netted off taxes paid, while the effective tax rate for the top decile was 11%. [22] In particular, when the GST rate was raised from 5% to 7% in July 2007, a household in the bottom 20% had to pay additional GST of $370 per year, but received an offset package of $910 per year, in addition to permanent benefits of $1,000 per year. [23]

Calls to exempt basic essentials from GST

Some critics contend that basic essentials such as food and healthcare should be made exempt from GST, to help lower-income households. The government argued that having such exemptions would actually help the higher-income more than poorer Singaporeans, because well-off households usually spend much more on essentials (whether food or healthcare or other basic necessities) than a lower-income household. In addition, lower-income households would not benefit much from such an exemption, as spending on essentials constitutes a small proportion of lower-income household expenditures. For example, for the bottom 20% of households, essential food items comprised only 6% of their total household expenditures; after including all other food items, the total was only 15% of their expenditures. [23]

If essentials were to be exempted from GST, there would be a need to make up for the revenue shortfall through a higher GST rate on other goods and services, which lower-income households would also have to bear. The government argued that the experience of other countries demonstrated that granting exemptions would distort production and consumption decisions and cause a contentious and highly complex process of determining the goods and services that merit exemption. This would increase compliance and administration costs for businesses, and these costs would be passed on to consumers.

In addition, the experience of other countries have shown that exempting or reducing GST on certain items did not mean that tax savings would be passed on to consumers. For example, this idea is in place in Australia, which has a GST rate of 10%. [4] [23] Therefore, the GST should be kept broad-based to keep the GST low and the GST system simple, while help is directly provided to the lower-income through transfers and subsidies. [23] In addition, the government has been absorbing GST in full for all subsidised patients in public hospitals and polyclinics since the GST was introduced in 1994. GST has also been absorbed for all subsidised patients receiving long-term care services. [24]

Calls to reduce the GST rate

In response to the rising cost of living, politicians from opposition parties have called for the GST rate to be reduced. The Singapore government has argued that reducing the rate of GST would benefit the wealthy more than the poor, as the bulk of GST is collected from foreigners and higher-income earners. In 2010, 84.2% of all GST paid was collected from foreigners and the top 40% of Singaporean households, while the bottom 20% of households contributed only 4% of all GST paid. The government argued that as the GST was a core part of a fiscal system that provides transfers to the lower income, reducing the GST rate would be costly and inequitable, and leave the government with less resources to help the lower income. [23]

Notes

  1. ↑ While the United States does not have GST/VAT, it does require consumers to pay federal excise taxes on the purchase of oil, alcohol, tobacco and other similar products. Furthermore, U.S. states and cities collect sales taxes. The federal government also raises money primarily through the income tax system.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Singapore</span>

The economy of Singapore is a highly developed mixed market economy with dirigiste characteristics. Singapore's economy has been consistently ranked as the most open in the world, the joint 4th-least corrupt, and the most pro-business. Singapore has low tax-rates and the highest per-capita GDP in the world in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP). The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is headquartered in Singapore.

The goods and services tax is a value added tax introduced in Canada on January 1, 1991, by the government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. The GST, which is administered by Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), replaced a previous hidden 13.5% manufacturers' sales tax (MST).

The harmonized sales tax (HST) is a consumption tax in Canada. It is used in provinces where both the federal goods and services tax (GST) and the regional provincial sales tax (PST) have been combined into a single value-added tax.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taxation in the United Kingdom</span> United Kingdom tax codes

In the United Kingdom, taxation may involve payments to at least three different levels of government: central government, devolved governments and local government. Central government revenues come primarily from income tax, National Insurance contributions, value added tax, corporation tax and fuel duty. Local government revenues come primarily from grants from central government funds, business rates in England, Council Tax and increasingly from fees and charges such as those for on-street parking. In the fiscal year 2014–15, total government revenue was forecast to be £648 billion, or 37.7 per cent of GDP, with net taxes and National Insurance contributions standing at £606 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Goods and services tax (Australia)</span> Type of value added tax used in Australia

Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Australia is a value added tax of 10% on most goods and services sales, with some exemptions and concessions. GST is levied on most transactions in the production process, but is in many cases refunded to all parties in the chain of production other than the final consumer.

An ad valorem tax is a tax whose amount is based on the value of a transaction or of a property. It is typically imposed at the time of a transaction, as in the case of a sales tax or value-added tax (VAT). An ad valorem tax may also be imposed annually, as in the case of a real or personal property tax, or in connection with another significant event. In some countries, a stamp duty is imposed as an ad valorem tax.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indirect tax</span> Type of tax

An indirect tax is a tax that is levied upon goods and services before they reach the customer who ultimately pays the indirect tax as a part of market price of the good or service purchased. Alternatively, if the entity who pays taxes to the tax collecting authority does not suffer a corresponding reduction in income, i.e., impact and tax incidence are not on the same entity meaning that tax can be shifted or passed on, then the tax is indirect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tharman Shanmugaratnam</span> 9th President of Singapore

Tharman Shanmugaratnam, also known mononymously as Tharman, is a Singaporean politician and economist who has served as the ninth president of Singapore since 2023.

A novated lease is a motor vehicle lease which has been novated, that is, the obligations in the contract have been transferred from one party to another.

Income taxes are the most significant form of taxation in Australia, and collected by the federal government through the Australian Taxation Office. Australian GST revenue is collected by the Federal government, and then paid to the states under a distribution formula determined by the Commonwealth Grants Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Canadian federal budget</span>

The Canadian federal budget for the fiscal year 2006–2007, was presented to the House of Commons of Canada by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty on May 2, 2006. Among the most notable elements of the federal budget were its reduction of the Goods and Services Tax by one percentage point, income tax cuts for middle-income earners, and $1,200-per-child childcare payment for Canadian parents.

The goods and services tax (GST) was a proposed value-added tax in Hong Kong. Consultation over a period of nine months was launched on 19 July 2006 and stirred considerable controversy.

The Competitive Tax Plan is an approach to taxation, suggested in the United States, that would impose a 10–15% value added tax (VAT) and reduce personal and corporate income taxes. The plan was created by Michael J. Graetz, a tax law professor at Columbia Law School and a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy. Graetz states that the plan would generate enough revenue to exclude families earning less than $100,000 of annual income from having to pay income taxes or file tax returns. The Competitive Tax Plan would provide a new payroll tax offset to replace the Earned Income Tax Credit, protecting low and moderate income workers from any tax increase under the new system. Under the initial proposal, households with an annual income of more than $100,000 would be taxed at a flat 25% rate and the corporate income tax rate would be reduced to 25%. Graetz argues that reducing the corporate tax rate "would make the United States an extremely attractive nation for corporate investments for both U.S. citizens and foreign investors." In 2013, Graetz presented an updated version of his plan for 2015.

Consumption taxes have been levied in the Canadian province of British Columbia since the introduction of the Provincial Sales Tax (PST) on 1 July 1948, as part of the Social Service Tax Act. Sales in the province have also been subject to the federal Goods and Services Tax (GST) since its introduction on 1 January 1991.

Taxation in Afghanistan includes corporate taxes, income taxes, customs and fees.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is an abolished value-added tax in Malaysia. GST is levied on most transactions in the production process, but is refunded with exception of Blocked Input Tax, to all parties in the chain of production other than the final consumer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Value-added tax in the United Kingdom</span>

In the United Kingdom, the value added tax (VAT) was introduced in 1973, replacing Purchase Tax, and is the third-largest source of government revenue, after income tax and National Insurance. It is administered and collected by HM Revenue and Customs, primarily through the Value Added Tax Act 1994.

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a successor to VAT used in India on the supply of goods and services. Both VAT and GST have the same taxation slabs. It is a comprehensive, multistage, destination-based tax: comprehensive because it has subsumed almost all the indirect taxes except a few state taxes. Multi-staged as it is, the GST is imposed at every step in the production process, but is meant to be refunded to all parties in the various stages of production other than the final consumer and as a destination-based tax, it is collected from point of consumption and not point of origin like previous taxes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Value-added tax</span> Form of consumption tax

A value-added tax (VAT), known in some countries as a goods and services tax (GST), is a type of tax that is assessed incrementally. It is levied on the price of a product or service at each stage of production, distribution, or sale to the end consumer. If the ultimate consumer is a business that collects and pays to the government VAT on its products or services, it can reclaim the tax paid. It is similar to, and is often compared with, a sales tax. VAT is an indirect tax because the person who ultimately bears the burden of the tax is not necessarily the same person as the one who pays the tax to the tax authorities.

A destination-based cash flow tax (DBCFT) is a form of border adjustment tax (BAT) that was proposed in the United States by the Republican Party in their 2016 policy paper "A Better Way — Our Vision for a Confident America", which promoted a move to the tax. It has been described by some sources as simply a form of import tariff, while others have argued that it has different consequences than those of a simple tariff.

References

  1. ↑ "Overview of GST in Singapore". 3ecpa.com.sg. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
  2. ↑ Report of the Economic Committee, The Singapore Economy: New Direction, Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry, 1986, p. 89
  3. ↑ Jenkins, Glenn P.; Khadka, Rup (March–April 1998), "Value Added Tax Policy and Implementation in Singapore" (PDF), VAT Monitor, Amsterdam: International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, 9 (2): 35–47, ISSN   0925-0832
  4. 1 2 Economic Review Committee Sub-Committee on Policies related to Taxation, the CPF system, Wages and Land (11 April 2002). "Restructuring the Tax System for Growth and Job Creation". Archived from the original on 19 August 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ↑ Budget Highlights Financial Year 2005/2006: Creating Opportunity, Building Community (PDF), Singapore Ministry of Finance, 2005
  6. ↑ "GST rate to rise to 7% from July 1". Channel NewsAsia. 15 February 2007. Archived from the original on 17 February 2007. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  7. ↑ "Direct transfers the better way". Singapore Ministry of Finance. 6 August 2008. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 3 April 2010.
  8. ↑ "GST Offset Package – Overview".
  9. ↑ Shanmugaratnam, Tharman (15 February 2007). "Budget Statement 2007". Singapore Ministry of Finance.
  10. ↑ Economic Review Committee Sub-Committee on Policies related to Taxation, the CPF system, Wages and Land (11 April 2002). "Restructuring the Tax System for Growth and Job Creation". Archived from the original on 7 April 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ↑ Kwan, Kevin (19 February 2018). "Budget 2018: GST to be imposed on digital services from 2020". CNA. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
  12. ↑ "High prices not always due to profiteering". AsiaOne. Archived from the original on 23 May 2009.
  13. ↑ "Singapore Budget 2018: GST to be raised from 7% to 9% some time between 2021 and 2025". The Straits Times. 19 February 2018. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
  14. ↑ "GST increase rate". insightconsultancy.wixsite.com/. 11 January 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
  15. ↑ "Budget 2022: GST will go up to 8% next year, then 9% from 2024; extra S$640 million to cushion impact". CNA. 18 February 2022. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  16. ↑ "Budget 2022: Singapore to raise GST from 7% to 9% in two stages in 2023 and 2024". The Straits Times. 18 February 2022. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  17. ↑ Goh, Yan Han (18 February 2022). "Budget 2022: Singapore to raise GST from 7% to 9% in two stages in 2023 and 2024". The Straits Times. Retrieved 18 July 2023. The goods and services tax (GST) rate will increase from 7 to 9 per cent in two stages - one percentage point each time on Jan 1, 2023 and Jan 1, 2024. The GST increase will be delayed to 2023 and the hike will be staggered over two steps - first, from 7 per cent to 8 per cent on Jan 1, 2023; followed by 8 per cent to 9 per cent on Jan 1, 2024.
  18. ↑ "IRAS | GST on Imported Low-Value Goods". Default. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  19. ↑ "VAT: A regressive tax?". Rediff.com. 21 March 2005.
  20. ↑ Chia-Tern, Huey Min (October 2004). "GST in Singapore: Policy Rationale, Implementation Strategy & Technical Design". Singapore Ministry of Finance.
  21. ↑ "How to Register for GST in Singapore".
  22. 1 2 Shanmugaratnam, Tharman (18 February 2011). "Budget Statement 2011". Singapore Ministry of Finance.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Shanmugaratnam, Tharman (2 March 2011). "Budget Debate Round-up Speech 2011" (PDF). Singapore Ministry of Finance.
  24. ↑ Singapore Ministry of Health (20 February 2012). "More Affordable Intermediate And Long-term Care Services To Help Singaporeans Age-in-place". Archived from the original on 23 February 2012. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.