Lunar habitation

Thus far, human visitation to the Moon does not rise to the permanence of full habitation

Lunar habitation is any long-term activity on the Moon, establishing human habitation on the Moon. Therefore, it is more than the particular surface space habitats and more specific than the moonbases which can consist of any facility.^{[ clarification needed ]}

History

Lunar habitats have been designed for many different proposed moonbases. The only lunar habitats to have been erected thus far were the temporary Apollo Lunar Modules, such as Eagle of Tranquility Base, the very first. As of 2024, two programs, the US-led Artemis program and Chinese-led International Lunar Research Station aim to establish permanent surface settlements.

Analysis

Growth of plants in lunar regolith, in a laboratory with Apollo program regolith samples.

Setting up structures on a natural body would provide ample sources of material for their construction, particularly for purposes such as shielding from cosmic radiation. The energy required to send objects from the Moon to space is much less than from Earth to space. This could allow the Moon to serve as a source of construction materials within cis-lunar space. Rockets launched from the Moon would require less locally produced propellant than rockets launched from Earth. Some proposals include using electric acceleration devices (mass drivers) to propel objects off the Moon without building rockets. Others have proposed momentum exchange tethers (see below). Furthermore, the Moon does have some gravity, which experience to date indicates may be vital for fetal development and long-term human health. ^{[1] [2]} Whether the Moon's gravity (roughly one sixth of Earth's) is adequate for this purpose is uncertain. In addition, the Moon is the closest large body in the Solar System to Earth. While some Earth-crosser asteroids occasionally pass closer, the Moon's distance is consistently within a small range close to 384,400 km.

Advantages

• Building observatory facilities on the Moon from lunar materials allows many of the benefits of space based facilities without the need to launch these into space. ^[3] The lunar soil, although it poses a problem for any moving parts of telescopes, can be mixed with carbon nanotubes and epoxies in the construction of mirrors up to 50 meters in diameter. ^{[4] [5]} It is relatively nearby; astronomical seeing is not a concern; certain craters near the poles are permanently dark and cold, and thus especially useful for infrared telescopes; and radio telescopes on the far side would be shielded from the radio chatter of Earth. ^[6] A lunar zenith telescope can be made cheaply with ionic liquid. ^[7]
• A farm at the lunar north pole could provide eight hours of sunlight per day during the local summer by rotating crops in and out of the sunlight which is continuous for the entire summer. A beneficial temperature, radiation protection, insects for pollination, and all other plant needs could be artificially provided during the local summer for a cost. One estimate suggested a 0.5 hectare space farm could feed 100 people. ^[8]

Disadvantages

• The long lunar night would impede reliance on solar power and require that a facility exposed to the sunlit equatorial surface be designed to withstand large temperature extremes (about 95 K (−178.2 °C) to about 400 K (127 °C)). An exception to this restriction are the so-called "peaks of eternal light" located at the lunar north pole that are constantly bathed in sunlight. The rim of Shackleton Crater, towards the lunar south pole, also has a near-constant solar illumination. Other areas near the poles that get light most of the time could be linked in a power grid. The temperature 1 meter below the surface of the Moon is estimated to be near constant over the period of a month varying with latitude from near 220 K (−53 °C) at the equator to near 150 K (−123 °C) at the poles. ^[9] This could be used as a heat reservoir.
• The Moon is highly depleted in volatile elements, such as nitrogen and hydrogen. Carbon, which forms volatile oxides, is also depleted. A number of robot probes including Lunar Prospector gathered evidence of hydrogen generally in the Moon's crust consistent with what would be expected from solar wind, and higher concentrations near the poles. ^[10] There had been some disagreement whether the hydrogen must necessarily be in the form of water. The 2009 mission of the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) proved that there is water on the Moon. ^[11] This water exists in ice form perhaps mixed in small crystals in the regolith in a colder landscape than has ever been mined. Other volatiles containing carbon and nitrogen were found in the same cold trap as ice. ^[12] If no sufficient means is found for recovering these volatiles on the Moon, they would need to be imported from some other source to support life and industrial processes. Volatiles would need to be stringently recycled. This would limit any growth and keep the habitat dependent on imports. Transport costs would be reduced by a lunar space elevator if and when one can be constructed. ^[13]
• The 2006 announcement by the Keck Observatory that the binary Trojan asteroid 617 Patroclus, ^[14] and possibly large numbers of other Trojan objects in Jupiter's orbit, are likely composed of water ice, with a layer of dust, and the hypothesized large amounts of water ice on the closer, main-belt asteroid 1 Ceres, suggest that importing volatiles from this region via the Interplanetary Transport Network may be practical in the not-so-distant future. These possibilities are dependent on complicated and expensive resource utilization from the mid to outer Solar System, which is not likely to become available for a significant period of time.
• The lack of a substantial atmosphere for insulation results in temperature extremes and makes the Moon's surface conditions somewhat like a deep space vacuum with surface pressure (night) of 3 × 10⁻¹⁵ bar. ^[15] It also leaves the lunar surface exposed to half as much radiation as in interplanetary space (with the other half blocked by the Moon itself underneath the habitat), raising the issues of the health threat from cosmic rays and the risk of proton exposure from the solar wind. In 2020 scientists reported the first ever measurements, made via China's Chang'e 4 lander, of the radiation exposure dose on the lunar surface. ^{[16] [17]} Lunar rubble can protect living quarters from cosmic rays. ^[18] Shielding against solar flares during expeditions outside is more problematic.
• When the Moon passes through the magnetotail of the Earth, the plasma sheet whips across its surface. Electrons crash into the Moon and are released again by UV photons on the day side but build up voltages on the dark side. ^[19] This causes a negative charge build up from −200 V to −1000 V. See Magnetic field of the Moon.

Problems

Unlike the disadvantages, these may be solvable.^{[ citation needed ]}

• Moon dust is an extremely abrasive glassy substance formed by micrometeorites and unrounded due to the lack of weathering. It sticks to everything, can damage equipment, and it may be toxic. Since it is bombarded by charged particles in the solar wind, it is highly ionized, and is extremely harmful when breathed in. During the 1960s and 1970s Apollo missions, astronauts were subject to respiratory problems on return flights from the Moon, for this reason. ^{[20] [21]}
• Growing crops on the Moon faces many difficult challenges due to the long lunar night (354 hours), extreme variation in surface temperature, exposure to solar flares, soil with almost no nitrogen and little potassium, and lack of insects for pollination. Due to the lack of any atmosphere of substance on the Moon, plants would need to be grown in sealed chambers, though experiments have shown that plants can thrive at pressures much lower than those on Earth. ^[22] The use of electric lighting to compensate for the 354-hour night might be difficult: a single acre (0.405 hectare) of plants on Earth enjoys a peak 4 megawatts of sunlight power at noon. Experiments conducted by the Soviet space program in the 1970s suggest it is possible to grow conventional crops with the 354-hour light, 354-hour dark cycle. ^[23] A variety of concepts for lunar agriculture have been proposed, ^[24] including the use of minimal artificial light to maintain plants during the night and the use of fast-growing crops that might be started as seedlings with artificial light and be harvestable at the end of one lunar day. ^[25] An experiment in the Chinese Chang'e 4 lunar lander mission demonstrated that seeds could sprout and grow in protected conditions on the Moon (January 2019). The cotton seeds were able to handle the harsh conditions, at least initially, becoming the first plants ever to sprout on the surface of another world. But without a source of heat, the plants died in the cold lunar night. ^[26] Lampenflora which grows in caves that have fixed artificial light sources installed shows that plants exist that need very little light to survive.

Energy

Nuclear power

A nuclear fission reactor might fulfill most of a Moon base's power requirements. ^[27] With the help of fission reactors, one could overcome the difficulty of the 354 hour lunar night. According to NASA, a nuclear fission power station could generate a steady 40 kilowatts, equivalent to the demand of about eight houses on Earth. ^[27] An artist's concept of such a station published by NASA envisages the reactor being buried below the Moon's surface to shield it from its surroundings; out from a tower-like generator part reaching above the surface over the reactor, radiators would extend into space to send away any heat energy that may be left over. ^[28]

Radioisotope thermoelectric generators could be used as backup and emergency power sources for solar powered facilities. The needed radioisotopes could either be imported from earth as they are relatively energy-dense, or produced in situ by neutron irradiation of suitable materials (e.g. ²³⁷
Np - an unavoidably produced minor actinide in fission reactors operating with thermal neutrons - to produce the commonly used ²³⁸
Pu ) or separated chemically from the high level waste of the nuclear reactor (e.g. Americium-241). Such nuclear batteries have been used for decades in spacecraft by all major spacefaring nations and some have even been implanted in humans as power sources for medical devices such as pacemakers, meaning their behavior and tradeoffs are well understood. ^[29]

The Japanese spacecraft Kaguya confirmed the existence of both Uranium and Thorium near the lunar surface, ^[30] which might in the future allow for the local production of nuclear fission fuel from lunar resources. However, concentrations are relatively low and unless the thorium fuel cycle is used, uranium would likely have to be enriched to produce fuel usable in light water reactors. The isotopic composition of lunar uranium is not known, but there is little reason to assume it would differ much from that found on earth (99% ²³⁸
U, ~0.72% ²³⁵
U, 55 ppm ²³⁴
U). Nuclear reprocessing in situ would reduce the need for enrichment or imported fuel from earth. Pyroprocessing, which has been demonstrated at the Integral Fast Reactor prototype operated by Argonne National Laboratory, could be used instead of the de facto standard PUREX which requires large amounts of organic solvents.

One specific development program in the 2000s was the Fission Surface Power (FSP) project of NASA and DOE, a fission power system focused on "developing and demonstrating a nominal 40 kWe power system to support human exploration missions. The FSP system concept uses conventional low-temperature stainless steel, liquid metal-cooled reactor technology coupled with Stirling power conversion." As of 2010 ^[update] , significant component hardware testing had been successfully completed, and a non-nuclear system demonstration test was being fabricated. ^{[31] [ needs update ]}

In 2017 NASA started the Kilopower project that tested the KRUSTY reactor. Japan has the RAPID-L conceptual design.

Helium-3 mining could be used to provide a substitute for tritium for potential production of fusion power in the future.

Solar energy

Further information: Peak of eternal light

Solar energy is a possible source of power for a lunar base. Many of the raw materials needed for solar panel production can be extracted on site. The long lunar night (354 hours or 14.75 Earth days) is a drawback for solar power on the Moon's surface. This might be solved by building several power plants, so that at least one of them is always in daylight. Another possibility would be to build such a power plant where there is constant or near-constant sunlight, such as at the Malapert mountain near the lunar south pole, or on the rim of Peary crater near the north pole. Since lunar regolith contains structural metals like iron and aluminum, solar panels could be mounted high up on locally-built towers that might rotate to follow the Sun. A third possibility would be to leave the panels in orbit, and beam the power down as microwaves.

The solar energy converters need not be silicon solar panels. It may be more advantageous to use the larger temperature difference between Sun and shade to run heat engine generators. Concentrated sunlight could also be relayed via mirrors and used in Stirling engines or solar trough generators, or it could be used directly for lighting, agriculture and process heat. The focused heat might also be employed in materials processing to extract various elements from lunar surface materials.

Energy storage

Fuel cells on the Space Shuttle have operated reliably for up to 17 Earth days at a time. On the Moon, they would only be needed for 354 hours (14 3⁄4 days) – the length of the lunar night. Fuel cells produce water directly as a waste product. Current fuel cell technology is more advanced than the Shuttle's cells – PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) cells produce considerably less heat (though their waste heat would likely be useful during the lunar night) and are lighter, not to mention the reduced mass of the smaller heat-dissipating radiators. This makes PEMs more economical to launch from Earth than the shuttle's cells. PEMs have not yet been proven in space.

Combining fuel cells with electrolysis would provide a "perpetual" source of electricity – solar energy could be used to provide power during the lunar day, and fuel cells at night. During the lunar day, solar energy would also be used to electrolyze the water created in the fuel cells – although there would be small losses of gases that would have to be replaced.

Even if lunar facilities could provide themselves access to a near-continuous source of solar energy, they would still need to maintain fuel cells or an alternate energy storage system to sustain themselves during lunar eclipses and emergency situations.

Locations

Further information: Geology of the Moon

Soviet astronomer Vladislav V. Shevchenko proposed in 1988 the following three criteria that a lunar outpost should meet:^{[ citation needed ]}

• good conditions for transport operations;
• a great number of different types of natural objects and features on the Moon of scientific interest; and
• natural resources, such as oxygen. The abundance of certain minerals, such as iron oxide, varies dramatically over the lunar surface. ^[32]

While a habitat might be located anywhere, potential locations for a lunar habitat fall into three broad categories.

Polar regions

There are two reasons why the north pole and south pole of the Moon might be attractive locations for a human facility. First, there is evidence for the presence of water in some continuously shaded areas near the poles. ^[33] Second, the Moon's axis of rotation is sufficiently close to being perpendicular to the ecliptic plane that the radius of the Moon's polar circles is less than 50 km. Power collection stations could therefore be plausibly located so that at least one is exposed to sunlight at all times, thus making it possible to power polar facilities almost exclusively with solar energy. Solar power would be unavailable only during a lunar eclipse, but these events are relatively brief and absolutely predictable. Any such habitat would therefore require a reserve energy supply that could temporarily sustain a habitat during lunar eclipses or in the event of any incident or malfunction affecting solar power collection. Hydrogen fuel cells would be ideal for this purpose, since the hydrogen needed could be sourced locally using the Moon's polar water and surplus solar power. Moreover, due to the Moon's uneven surface some sites have nearly continuous sunlight. For example, Malapert mountain, located near the Shackleton crater at the lunar south pole, offers several advantages as a site:

• It is exposed to the Sun most of the time (see Peak of Eternal Light); two closely spaced arrays of solar panels would receive nearly continuous power. ^[34]
• Its proximity to Shackleton Crater (116 km, or 69.8 mi) means that it could provide power and communications to the crater. This crater is potentially valuable for astronomical observation. An infrared instrument would benefit from the very low temperatures. A radio telescope would benefit from being shielded from Earth's broad spectrum radio interference. ^[34]
• The nearby Shoemaker and other craters are in constant deep shadow, and might contain valuable concentrations of hydrogen and other volatiles. ^[34]
• At around 5,000 meters (16,000 feet) elevation, it offers line of sight communications over a large area of the Moon, as well as to Earth. ^[34]
• The South Pole-Aitken basin is located at the lunar south pole. This is the second largest known impact basin in the Solar System, as well as the oldest and biggest impact feature on the Moon, ^[35] and should provide geologists access to deeper layers of the Moon's crust. It is where the Chinese Chang'e 4 has landed, on the far side. ^[36]

NASA chose to use a south-polar site for the lunar outpost reference design in the Exploration Systems Architecture Study chapter on lunar architecture. ^[35] At the north pole, the rim of Peary Crater has been proposed as a favorable location for a base. ^[37] Examination of images from the Clementine mission in 1994 ^[38] appear to show that parts of the crater rim are permanently illuminated by sunlight (except during lunar eclipses). ^[37] As a result, the temperature conditions are expected to remain very stable at this location, averaging −50 °C (−58 °F). ^[37] This is comparable to winter conditions in Earth's Poles of Cold in Siberia and Antarctica. The interior of Peary Crater may also harbor hydrogen deposits. ^[37]

A 1994 ^[39] bistatic radar experiment performed during the Clementine mission suggested the presence of water ice around the south pole. ^{[40] [41]} The Lunar Prospector spacecraft reported in 2008 enhanced hydrogen abundances at the south pole and even more at the north pole. ^[42] On the other hand, results reported using the Arecibo radio telescope have been interpreted by some to indicate that the anomalous Clementine radar signatures are not indicative of ice, but surface roughness. ^[43] This interpretation is not universally agreed upon. ^[44]

A potential limitation of the polar regions is that the inflow of solar wind can create an electrical charge on the leeward side of crater rims. The resulting voltage difference can affect electrical equipment, change surface chemistry, erode surfaces and levitate lunar dust. ^[45]

Equatorial regions

The lunar equatorial regions are likely to have higher concentrations of helium-3 (rare on Earth but much sought after for use in nuclear fusion research) because the solar wind has a higher angle of incidence. ^[46] They also enjoy an advantage in extra-Lunar traffic: The rotation advantage for launching material is slight due to the Moon's slow rotation, but the corresponding orbit coincides with the ecliptic, nearly coincides with the lunar orbit around Earth, and nearly coincides with the equatorial plane of Earth.

Several probes have landed in the Oceanus Procellarum area. There are many areas and features that could be subject to long-term study, such as the Reiner Gamma anomaly and the dark-floored Grimaldi crater.

Far side

The lunar far side lacks direct communication with Earth, though a communication satellite at the L₂ Lagrangian point, or a network of orbiting satellites, could enable communication between the far side of the Moon and Earth. ^[47] The far side is also a good location for a large radio telescope because it is well shielded from the Earth. ^[48] Due to the lack of atmosphere, the location is also suitable for an array of optical telescopes, similar to the Very Large Telescope in Chile. ^[3]

Scientists have estimated that the highest concentrations of helium-3 can be found in the maria on the far side, as well as near side areas containing concentrations of the titanium-based mineral ilmenite. On the near side the Earth and its magnetic field partially shield the surface from the solar wind during each orbit. But the far side is fully exposed, and thus should receive a somewhat greater proportion of the ion stream. ^[49]

Lunar lava tubes

Sunlight reveals the terrain of a 100-meter-deep lunar pit crater, which may be a collapsed lava tube.

Lunar lava tubes are a potential location for constructing a lunar base. Any intact lava tube on the Moon could serve as a shelter from the severe environment of the lunar surface, with its frequent meteorite impacts, high-energy ultra-violet radiation and energetic particles, and extreme diurnal temperature variations. Lava tubes provide ideal positions for shelter because of their access to nearby resources. They also have proven themselves to be reliable structures, having withstood the test of time for billions of years.

An underground habitat would escape the extreme temperatures on the Moon's surface. The day period (about 354 hours) has an average temperature of about 107 °C (225 °F), although it can rise as high as 123 °C (253 °F). The night period (also 354 hours) has an average temperature of about −153 °C (−243 °F). ^[50] Underground, both day and night periods would be around −23 °C (−9 °F), and humans could install ordinary heaters for warmth. ^[51]

One such lava tube was discovered in early 2009. ^[52]

Habitat construction

There have been numerous proposals regarding lunar habitats. The designs have evolved throughout the years as knowledge about the Moon has grown, and as the technological possibilities have changed.

The proposed habitats range from the actual spacecraft landers or their used fuel tanks, to inflatable modules of various shapes. Some hazards of the lunar environment such as sharp temperature shifts, lack of atmosphere or magnetic field (which means higher levels of radiation and micrometeoroids) and long nights, were unknown early on. Proposals have shifted as these hazards were recognized and taken into consideration.

Underground habitat

See also: Underground city

The temperature and pressure of the Moon's interior increase with depth

Some suggest building the lunar habitats underground, which would give protection from radiation and micrometeoroids. This would also greatly reduce the risk of air leakage, as the habitat would be fully sealed from the outside except for a few exits to the surface. These underground habitats would be akin to bunkers\fallout shelter

The construction of an underground habitat would probably be more complex; one of the first machines from Earth might be a remote-controlled excavating machine. Once created, some sort of hardening would be necessary to avoid collapse, possibly a spray-on concrete-like substance made from available materials. ^[53] A more porous insulating material also made in-situ could then be applied. Rowley & Neudecker have suggested "melt-as-you-go" machines that would leave glassy internal surfaces. ^[54] Mining methods such as the room and pillar might also be used. Inflatable self-sealing fabric habitats might then be put in place to retain air.

An alternative solution is studied in Europe by students to excavate a habitat in the ice-filled craters of the Moon. ^[55]

Underground farming

Farms set up underground would need artificial sunlight. As an alternative to excavating, a lava tube could be covered and insulated, thus solving the problem of radiation exposure.

Surface habitats

Double-dome concept for habitat creation on the moon

A NASA model of a proposed inflatable module

A possibly easier solution would be to build the lunar habitat on the surface, and cover modules with lunar soil. The lunar soil is composed of a unique blend of silica and iron-containing compounds that may be fused into a glass-like solid using microwave energy. ^[56] Blacic has studied the mechanical properties of lunar glass and has shown that it is a promising material for making rigid structures, if coated with metal to keep moisture out. ^[57] This may allow for the use of "lunar bricks" in structural designs, or the vitrification of loose dirt to form a hard, ceramic crust.

A lunar habitat built on the surface would need to be protected by improved radiation and micrometeoroid shielding. Building the lunar base inside a deep crater would provide at least partial shielding against radiation and micrometeoroids. Artificial magnetic fields have been proposed ^{[58] [59]} as a means to provide radiation shielding for long range deep space crewed missions, and it might be possible to use similar technology on a lunar habitat. Some regions on the Moon possess strong local magnetic fields that might partially mitigate exposure to charged solar and galactic particles. ^[60]

In a turn from the usual engineer-designed lunar habitats, London-based Foster + Partners architectural firm proposed a building construction 3D-printer technology in January 2013 that would use lunar regolith raw materials to produce lunar building structures while using enclosed inflatable habitats for housing the human occupants inside the hard-shell lunar structures. Overall, these habitats would require only ten percent of the structure mass to be transported from Earth, while using local lunar materials for the other 90 percent of the structure mass. ^[61] "Printed" lunar soil would provide both "radiation and temperature insulation. Inside, a lightweight pressurized inflatable with the same dome shape would be the living environment for the first human Moon settlers." ^[61] The building technology would include mixing lunar material with magnesium oxide, which would turn the "moonstuff into a pulp that can be sprayed to form the block" when a binding salt is applied that "converts [this] material into a stone-like solid." ^[61] Terrestrial versions of this 3D-printing building technology are already printing 2 metres (6 ft 7 in) of building material per hour with the next-generation printers capable of 3.5 metres (11 ft) per hour, sufficient to complete a building in a week. ^[61]

3D-printed structures

1.5-metric-ton (3,300 lb) block 3D‑printed from simulated lunar dust, to demonstrate the feasibility of constructing a Moon base using local materials

On January 31, 2013, the ESA working with Foster + Partners, tested a 3D-printed structure that could be constructed of lunar regolith for use as a Moon base. ^[62]

Transportation

Earth to the Moon

Conventional rockets have been used for most lunar explorations to date. The ESA's SMART-1 mission from 2003 to 2006 used conventional chemical rockets to reach orbit and Hall effect thrusters to arrive at the Moon in 13 months. NASA would have used chemical rockets on its Ares V booster and Altair lander, that were being developed for a planned return to the Moon around 2019, but this was cancelled. The construction workers, location finders, and other astronauts vital to building, would have been taken four at a time in NASA's Orion spacecraft.

Space elevators are another proposed concept of Earth-Lunar transport. ^{[63] [64] [13]}

On the surface

Artist's concept of a lunar rover being unloaded from a cargo spaceship

Lunar habitation would need the ability to transport cargo and people to and from modules and spacecraft, and to carry out scientific study of a larger area of the lunar surface for long periods of time. Proposed concepts include a variety of vehicle designs, from small open rovers to large pressurized modules with lab equipment, such as the Toyota rover concept. ^[65]

Rovers could be useful if the terrain is not too steep or hilly. The only rovers to have operated on the surface of the Moon (as of 2008 ^[update] ) are the three Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicles (LRV), developed by Boeing, the two robotic Soviet Lunokhods and the Chinese Yutu rover in 2013. The LRV was an open rover for a crew of two, and a range of 92 kilometres (57 mi) during one lunar day. One NASA study resulted in the Mobile Lunar Laboratory concept, a crewed pressurized rover for a crew of two, with a range of 396 kilometres (246 mi). The Soviet Union developed different rover concepts in the Lunokhod series and the L5 for possible use on future crewed missions to the Moon or Mars. These rover designs were all pressurized for longer sorties. ^[66]

If multiple bases were established on the lunar surface, they could be linked together by permanent railway systems. Both conventional and magnetic levitation (Maglev) systems have been proposed for the transport lines. Mag-Lev systems are particularly attractive as there is no atmosphere on the surface to slow down the train, so the vehicles could achieve velocities comparable to - or even higher than - aircraft on Earth. In essence any maglev on the moon would behave similar to a vactrain without the need to provide an artificial vacuum. One significant difference with lunar trains is that the cars would need to be individually sealed and possess their own life support systems.^{[ citation needed ]}

For difficult areas, a flying vehicle may be more suitable. Bell Aerosystems proposed their design for the Lunar Flying Vehicle as part of a study for NASA, while Bell proposed the Manned Flying System, a similar concept.^{[ citation needed ]}

Surface to space

Launch technology

A mass driver—the long structure that goes toward the horizon—as part of a lunar base. NASA conceptual illustration.

Experience so far indicates that launching human beings into space is much more expensive than launching cargo.^{[ citation needed ]} One way to get materials and products from the Moon to an interplanetary way station might be with a mass driver, a magnetically accelerated projectile launcher. Cargo would be picked up from orbit or an Earth-Moon Lagrangian point by a shuttle craft using ion propulsion, solar sails or other means and delivered to Earth orbit or other destinations such as near-Earth asteroids, Mars or other planets, perhaps using the Interplanetary Transport Network.^{[ citation needed ]}

A lunar space elevator could transport people, raw materials and products to and from an orbital station at Lagrangian points L₁ or L₂. Chemical rockets would take a payload from Earth to the L₁ lunar Lagrange location. From there a tether would slowly lower the payload to a soft landing on the lunar surface.^{[ citation needed ]} Other possibilities include a momentum exchange tether system.^{[ citation needed ]}

Launch costs

• Estimates of the cost per unit mass of launching cargo or people from the Moon vary and the cost impacts of future technological improvements are difficult to predict. An upper bound on the cost of launching material from the Moon might be about $40,000,000 per kilogram, based on dividing the Apollo program costs by the amount of material returned. ^{[67] [68] [69]} At the other extreme, the incremental cost of launching material from the Moon using an electromagnetic accelerator could be quite low. The efficiency of launching material from the Moon with a proposed electric accelerator is suggested to be about 50%. ^[70] If the carriage of a mass driver weighs the same as the cargo, two kilograms must be accelerated to orbital velocity for each kilogram put into orbit. The overall system efficiency would then drop to 25%. So 1.4 kilowatt-hours would be needed to launch an incremental kilogram of cargo to low orbit from the Moon. ^[71] At $0.1/kilowatt-hour, a typical cost for electrical power on Earth, that amounts to $0.16 for the energy to launch a kilogram of cargo into orbit. For the actual cost of an operating system, energy loss for power conditioning, the cost of radiating waste heat, the cost of maintaining all systems, and the interest cost of the capital investment are considerations.
• Passengers cannot be divided into the parcel size suggested for the cargo of a mass driver, nor subjected to hundreds of gravities acceleration. Technical developments could also affect the cost of launching passengers to orbit from the Moon. Instead of bringing all fuel and oxidizer from Earth, liquid oxygen could be produced from lunar materials and hydrogen should be available from the lunar poles. The cost of producing these on the Moon is yet unknown, but they would be more expensive than production costs on Earth. The situation of the local hydrogen is most open to speculation. As a rocket fuel, hydrogen could be extended by combining it chemically with silicon to form silane, ^[72] which has yet to be demonstrated in an actual rocket engine. In the absence of more technical developments, the cost of transporting people from the Moon would be an impediment to growth.

Surface to and from cis-lunar space

A cislunar transport system has been proposed using tethers to achieve momentum exchange. ^[73] This system requires zero net energy input, and could not only retrieve payloads from the lunar surface and transport them to Earth, but could also soft land payloads on to the lunar surface.

See also

• Habitability of natural satellites — referring to life evolving on the satellite
• Lunar module
• Moonbase
• Surface chauvinism and surfacism
• Space habitat
• Space habitat (facility)
• Space habitation

References

1. "Outer-space sex carries complications". NBC News. July 24, 2006. Retrieved 2008-02-18.
2. "Known effects of long-term space flights on the human body". racetomars.com. Archived from the original on 2008-02-24. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
3. Takahashi, Yuki (September 1999). "Mission Design for Setting up an Optical Telescope on the Moon". California Institute of Technology. Archived from the original on 6 November 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2011.
4. Naeye, Robert (6 April 2008). "NASA Scientists Pioneer Method for Making Giant Lunar Telescopes". Goddard Space Flight Center. Retrieved 27 March 2011.
5. "Build astronomical observatories on the Moon?". physicstoday.org. Archived from the original on 7 November 2007. Retrieved 16 February 2008.
6. Chandler, David (15 February 2008). "MIT to lead development of new telescopes on moon". MIT News. Retrieved 27 March 2011.
7. Bell, Trudy (9 October 2008). "Liquid Mirror Telescopes on the Moon". Science News. NASA. Archived from the original on 29 Oct 2011. Retrieved 27 March 2011.
8. Salisbury, F. B. (1991). "Lunar farming: achieving maximum yield for the exploration of space" (PDF). HortScience. 26 (7): 827–833. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.26.7.827 . ISSN   0018-5345. PMID   11537565.
9. McGRAW-HILL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF Science & Technology, vol 11, 8th Edition, (c) 1997, p. 470
10. "Lunar2". Archived from the original on 9 December 2006. Retrieved 29 December 2012.
11. Jonas Dino: LCROSS Impact Data Indicates Water on Moon. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, November 13, 2009, retrieved June 23, 2011
12. PSRD CosmoSparks Report--An Icy Treat
13. Edwards, Bradley; Ragan, Philip (2010) [2006]. Leaving the Planet by Space Elevator. USA: Amazon. p. 183.
14. "Binary asteroid in Jupiter's orbit may be icy comet from solar system's infancy". berkeley.edu. Retrieved 16 February 2008.
15. "Moon fact sheet". NASA Moon Fact sheet. Retrieved 2019-12-30.
16. "New measurements show moon has hazardous radiation levels". phys.org. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
17. Zhang, Shenyi; Wimmer-Schweingruber, Robert F.; Yu, Jia; Wang, Chi; Fu, Qiang; Zou, Yongliao; Sun, Yueqiang; Wang, Chunqin; Hou, Donghui; Böttcher, Stephan I.; Burmeister, Sönke; Seimetz, Lars; Schuster, Björn; Knierim, Violetta; Shen, Guohong; Yuan, Bin; Lohf, Henning; Guo, Jingnan; Xu, Zigong; Forstner, Johan L. Freiherr von; Kulkarni, Shrinivasrao R.; Xu, Haitao; Xue, Changbin; Li, Jun; Zhang, Zhe; Zhang, He; Berger, Thomas; Matthiä, Daniel; Hellweg, Christine E.; Hou, Xufeng; Cao, Jinbin; Chang, Zhen; Zhang, Binquan; Chen, Yuesong; Geng, Hao; Quan, Zida (1 September 2020). "First measurements of the radiation dose on the lunar surface". Science Advances. 6 (39): eaaz1334. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.1334Z. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1334 . ISSN   2375-2548. PMC   7518862 . PMID   32978156.
18. NASA, A Tour of the Colony
19. NASA The Moon and the Magnetotail
20. "Lunar explorers face moon dust dilemma". NBC News. November 7, 2006. Retrieved 16 February 2008.
21. "Lunar dust might pose severe health risks for future human colonies on the Moon". Smithsonial Magazine. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
22. Massimino D, Andre M (1999). "Growth of wheat under one tenth of the atmospheric pressure". Adv Space Res. 24 (3): 293–6. Bibcode:1999AdSpR..24..293M. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00316-6. PMID   11542536.
23. Terskov, I. A. ; L.; Lisovskiĭ, G. M.; Ushakova, S. A.; Parshina, O. V.; Moiseenko, L. P. (May 1978). "Possibility of using higher plants in a life-support system on the Moon". Kosmicheskaia Biologiia I Aviakosmicheskaia Meditsina. 12 (3): 63–66. ISSN   0321-5040. PMID   26823.
24. "Lunar Agriculture". Artemis Project . Retrieved 16 February 2008.
25. "Farming in Space". quest.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 23 September 2008. Retrieved 16 February 2008.
26. "China Moon mission plants dead". Space.com. 2019-01-16. Retrieved 2019-12-30.
27. Stephanie Schierholz, Grey Hautaluoma, Katherine K. Martin: NASA Developing Fission Surface Power Technology. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, September 10, 2008, retrieved June 27, 2011
28. Kathleen Zona: IMAGE FOR RELEASE 08-042. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, September 10, 2008, retrieved June 27, 2011
29. "Review and Preview of Nuclear Battery Technology".
30. Yamashita, N.; Hasebe, N.; Reedy, R. C.; Kobayashi, S.; Karouji, Y.; Hareyama, M.; Shibamura, E.; Kobayashi, M.-N.; Okudaira, O.; d'Uston, C.; Gasnault, O.; Forni, O.; Kim, K. J. (2010). "Uranium on the Moon: Global distribution and U/Th ratio". Geophysical Research Letters. 37 (10). Bibcode:2010GeoRL..3710201Y. doi: 10.1029/2010GL043061 . S2CID   130221264.
31. Mason, Lee; Sterling Bailey; Ryan Bechtel; John Elliott; Jean-Pierre Fleurial; Mike Houts; Rick Kapernick; Ron Lipinski; Duncan MacPherson; Tom Moreno; Bill Nesmith; Dave Poston; Lou Qualls; Ross Radel; Abraham Weitzberg; Jim Werner (18 November 2010). "Small Fission Power System Feasibility Study — Final Report" . NASA/DOE . Retrieved 3 October 2015.
32. Composition of the Moon's Crust by Linda M. V. Martel. Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology
33. "Ice on the Moon". thespacereview.com. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
34. "The Moon's Malapert Mountain Seen As Ideal Site for Lunar Lab". space.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2006. Retrieved 2008-02-18.
35. "Lunar Architecture" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 2008-02-18.
36. "Chang'e 4 landing site". Space.com. 2019-09-26. Retrieved 2019-12-30.
37. Burnham, Robert (20 April 2005). "Eternal light at a lunar pole". Astronomy.com. Retrieved 12 November 2017.
38. "Clementine Mission overview". Lunar Science & Exploration. Retrieved 2019-12-30.
39. Clementine Bistatic Radar Experiment, NASA, April 26, 2011, retrieved June 23, 2011
40. Nozette, S.; Lichtenberg, C. L.; Spudis, P.; Bonner, R.; Ort, W.; Malaret, E.; Robinson, M.; Shoemaker, E. M. (1996). "The Clementine Bistatic Radar Experiment". Science. 274 (5292): 1495–1498. Bibcode:1996Sci...274.1495N. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5292.1495 . hdl: 2060/19970023672 . PMID   8929403.
41. "The Clementine Mission". cmf.nrl.navy.mil. Archived from the original on 2008-02-14. Retrieved 2008-02-20.
42. "EUREKA! ICE FOUND AT LUNAR POLES". lunar.arc.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 2006-12-09. Retrieved 2008-02-20.
43. "Cornell News: No ice found at lunar poles (See above)" . Retrieved December 11, 2005.
44. Spudis, Paul. "Ice on the Moon". thespacereview.com. Retrieved 2006-02-19.
45. Staff (April 17, 2010). "Lunar Polar Craters May Be Electrified, NASA Calculations Show". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2010-04-19.
46. "Developing a Site Selection Strategy for a Lunar Outpost" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Institute. Retrieved 2008-02-19.
47. Lunar Far-side Communication Satellites (PDF). NASA (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-26. Retrieved 2008-02-19.
48. Takahashi, Y. "Radio Astronomy from the Lunar Far Side: Precursor Studies of Radio Wave Propagation Around the Moon". University of Glasgow. Archived from the original on 2002-05-04. Retrieved 2008-02-18.
49. Johnson, Jeffrey R.; Swindle, Timothy D.; Lucey, Paul G. (1999). "Estimated Solar Wind-Implanted Helium-3 Distribution on the Moon". Geophysical Research Letters. 26 (3): 385. Bibcode:1999GeoRL..26..385J. doi:10.1029/1998GL900305. S2CID   128484138 . Retrieved 2008-02-18.
50. "Artremis project: Lunar Surface Temperatures". Artemis Project. Archived from the original on 2014-07-29. Retrieved 2008-02-18.
51. Burke, James D. (2005). "Energy conversion evolution at lunar polar sites" (PDF). Journal of Earth System Science. 114 (6). The Planetary Society: 633–635. Bibcode:2005JESS..114..633B. doi: 10.1007/BF02715948 . S2CID   129577579 . Retrieved 2008-02-18.
52. "Moon hole might be suitable for colony". CNN. 2010-01-01.
53. Tung Dju (T. D.) Lin, cited via James, Barry (1992-02-13). "On Moon, Concrete Digs?". International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on 2006-11-24. Retrieved 2006-12-24.
54. Rowley, John C.; Neudecker, Joseph W. (1986). "In Situ Rock Melting Applied to Lunar Base Construction and for Exploration Drilling and Coring on the Moon". Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century: 465–467. Bibcode:1985lbsa.conf..465R.
55. "Webinar - "GLUNA 2021 student projects: outcome and next steps". Space Innovation. September 23, 2021. Retrieved 2021-09-26.
56. "Lunar Dirt Factories? A look at how regolith could be the key to permanent outposts on the moon". The Space Monitor. 2007-06-18. Retrieved 2008-10-24.^{[ dead link ]}
57. Blacic, James D. (1985). "Mechanical Properties of Lunar Materials Under Anhydrous, Hard Vacuum Conditions: Applications of Lunar Glass Structural Component". Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century: 487–495. Bibcode:1985lbsa.conf..487B.
58. Buhler, Charles (April 28, 2005). "Analysis of a Lunar Base Electrostatic Radiation Shield Concept" (PDF). Retrieved February 20, 2013.
59. Westover, Shayne (November 12, 2012). "Magnet Architectures and Active Radiation Shielding Study" (PDF). Retrieved February 20, 2013.
60. Powell, David (2006-11-14). "Moon's Magnetic Umbrella Seen as Safe Haven for Explorers". SPACE.com. Retrieved 2006-12-24.
61. Diaz, Jesus (2013-01-31). "This Is What the First Lunar Base Could Really Look Like". Gizmodo. Retrieved 2013-02-01.
62. "Foster + Partners works with European Space Agency to 3D print structures on the moon". Foster + Partners. 31 January 2013. Archived from the original on 3 February 2013. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
63. Smitherman, D. V., "Space Elevators, An Advanced Earth-Space Infrastructure for the New Millennium", NASA/CP-2000-210429
64. Sarmont, E., "Affordable to the Individual Spaceflight", accessed Feb. 6, 2014
65. "Toyota JAXA Moon rover concept". caradvice.com.au. 2019-03-16. Retrieved 2019-12-30.
66. "Lunar base". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Retrieved 2006-12-24.
67. McGraw-Hill (1997). Mcgraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology. Vol. 17. McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated. p. 107. ISBN   978-0-07-144143-8. 385 kilograms of rocks were returned to Earth with the Apollo missions.
68. "Weight on Moon". Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2009. An astronaut with space suit weighs about 150 kilograms.
69. Stine, Deborah D. (4 February 2009). "The Manhattan Project, the Apollo Program, and Federal Energy Technology R&D programs: A Comparative Analysis" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Retrieved July 9, 2009. The Apollo program costs were about $98 billion.^{[ permanent dead link ]}
70. David Darling. "mass driver". The Internet Encyclopedia of Science. Retrieved July 9, 2009.
71. The circular orbital speed for any central body equals the square root of the quantity (the radius of the orbit times the gravity of the central body at that point); for the lunar surface: the square root of (1,730,000 meters times 1.63 meters per second squared) is 1680 meters per second. The energy of this motion for one kilogram is one half the square of the speed, 1,410,000 watt seconds or 0.392 kilowatt-hours. With a 25% efficient accelerator, 1.6 kilowatt-hours are needed to achieve the orbital velocity.
72. "Moon Miners' Manifesto: Editorial" . Retrieved 30 September 2014.
73. Hoyt, Robert, P.; Uphoff, Chauncey (20–24 June 1999). "Cislunar Tether Transport System" (PDF). 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Los Angeles, CA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. AIAA 99-2690. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 14 November 2021.