1904 Riverina by-election

Last updated

1904 Riverina by-election
Flag of Australia (converted).svg
  1903 18 May 1904 1906  

The Riverina seat in the House of Representatives
Registered19,031
Turnout10,995 (57.77%)
 First partySecond party
  John Chanter, Australian politician in c.1901.jpg Robert Blackwood.jpg
Candidate John Chanter Robert Blackwood
Party Protectionist Free Trade
Popular vote5,5475,184
Percentage51.7%48.3%
SwingIncrease2.svg 1.7Decrease2.svg 1.7

MP before election

Robert Blackwood
Free Trade

Elected MP

John Chanter
Protectionist

A by-election was held for the Australian House of Representatives seat of Riverina on 18 May 1904. This was triggered after the result at the 1903 election, which had seen Free Trade candidate Robert Blackwood narrowly defeat Protectionist MP John Chanter, was declared void due to allegations of electoral irregularities. [1]

At the by-election Chanter defeated Blackwood.

Results

1904 Riverina by-election [2] [3]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Protectionist John Chanter 5,54751.69+1.72
Free Trade Robert Blackwood 5,18448.31−1.72
Total formal votes10,73197.60−0.04
Informal votes2642.40+0.04
Registered electors 19,031
Turnout 10,99557.77+8.84
Protectionist gain from Free Trade Swing +1.72

Related Research Articles

Australian constitutional law

Australian constitutional law is the area of the law of Australia relating to the interpretation and application of the Constitution of Australia. Several major doctrines of Australian constitutional law have developed.

The 1913 Australian referendum was held on 31 May 1913. It contained six referendum questions and was held in conjunction with the 1913 federal election.

This is a list of the members of the Australian House of Representatives in the Second Australian Parliament, which was elected on 16 December 1903.

John Cusack (Australian politician) Australian politician

John Joseph Cusack was an Australian politician and businessman. He was a member of the Australian Labor Party (ALP) for most of his career and served in the New South Wales Legislative Assembly (1910–1917) and House of Representatives (1929–1931).

Court of Disputed Returns (Australia) Special electoral jurisdiction of the High Court of Australia

The Court of Disputed Returns in Australia is a special jurisdiction of the High Court of Australia. The High Court, sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns, hears challenges regarding the validity of federal elections. The jurisdiction is twofold: (1) on a petition to the Court by an individual with a relevant interest or by the Australian Electoral Commission, or (2) on a reference by either house of the Commonwealth Parliament. This jurisdiction was initially established by Part XVI of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1902 and is now contained in Part XXII of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. Challenges regarding the validity of State elections are heard by the Supreme Court of that State as the State's Court of Disputed Returns.

John Chanter Australian politician

John Moore Chanter was an Australian politician, farmer and commission agent. He was a member of the Protectionist Party, as well as the Australian Labor Party and the Nationalist Party of Australia.

Robert Blackwood (Australian politician) Australian politician, businessman and pastoralist (1861–1940)

Robert Officer Blackwood was an Australian politician, businessman and pastoralist. He was briefly a member of the Australian House of Representatives for the Division of Riverina.

Edwin Kerby Australian politician

Edwin Thomas John Kerby was an Australian politician.

Albert Palmer (Australian politician) Australian politician

Albert Clayton Palmer was an Australian politician. He was a member of the Australian House of Representatives from 1906 to 1907 and from 1907 until his death, representing the electorate of Echuca for the Anti-Socialist Party and its successors the Commonwealth Liberal Party and Nationalist Party.

David Storrer Australian politician

David Storrer was an Australian politician.

This article provides information on candidates who stood for the 1906 Australian federal election. The election was held on 12 December 1906.

Joseph Vardon Australian politician

Joseph Vardon was an Australian politician. Born in Adelaide, he received a primary education before becoming a farm worker and apprentice printer, running his own printing business by 1871. He sat on Hindmarsh, Unley, and Adelaide City councils, and was President of the South Australian Liberal Union. He was elected to the Australian Senate as an Anti-Socialist Senator for South Australia in the 1906 Election, but his election was declared void on 31 May 1907. The South Australian Labor Government attempted to install James O'Loghlin in the vacancy. Vardon's initial attempts to obtain a fresh election were unsuccessful. Vardon subsequently succeeded with the High Court declaring O'Loghlin's appointment was void and ordering a supplementary election. Vardon and O'Loghlin both contested the election, with Vardon winning comfortably with 54% of the vote. He was defeated in the 1913 Election, by now a member of the Commonwealth Liberal Party.

This is a list of members of the Australian Senate from 1907 to 1910. Half of its members were elected at the 16 December 1903 election and had terms starting on 1 January 1904 and finishing on 30 June 1910; the other half were elected at the 12 December 1906 election and had terms starting on 1 January 1907 and finishing on 30 June 1913. They had an extended term as a result of the 1906 referendum, which changed Senate terms to finish on 30 June, rather than 31 December.

This is a list of electoral results for the Division of Riverina in Australian federal elections from the division's creation in 1901 until its abolition in 1984, and from its creation in 1993 until the present.

1904 Melbourne by-election

A by-election was held for the Australian House of Representatives seat of Melbourne in Victoria on 30 March 1904. This was triggered by the Chief Justice of the High Court declaring invalid the election of Sir Malcolm McEacharn to the seat in the 1903 federal election. The writ for the by-election was issued by the Speaker of the Australian House of Representatives on 15 March 1904.

<i>Rowe v Electoral Commissioner</i> Australian high court case

Rowe v Electoral Commissioner is a High Court of Australia case dealing with the requirement of the Australian Constitution that members of Parliament be "directly chosen by the people". The High Court held that Commonwealth legislation that sought to restrict the time in which a person may seek to enroll in an election or alter their enrolment details after the writs for an election have been issued was invalid.

1907 Echuca by-election Australian federal by-election

A by-election was held for the Australian House of Representatives seat of Echuca on 10 July 1907. This was triggered after the result at the 1906 election, which saw Anti-Socialist candidate Albert Palmer narrowly defeat Protectionist MP Thomas Kennedy by just 32 votes. This election was declared void by the Court of Disputed Returns.

<i>Blundell v Vardon</i>

Blundell v Vardon, was the first of three decisions of the High Court of Australia concerning the 1906 election for Senators for South Australia. Sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns, Barton J held that the election of Anti-Socialist Party candidate Joseph Vardon as the third senator for South Australia was void due to irregularities in the way the returning officers marked some votes. The Parliament of South Australia appointed James O'Loghlin. Vardon sought to have the High Court compel the Governor of South Australia to hold a supplementary election, however the High Court held in R v Governor of South Australia; Ex parte Vardon that it had no power to do so. Vardon then petitioned the Senate seeking to remove O'Loghlin and rather than decide the issue, the Senate referred the matter to the High Court. The High Court held in Vardon v O'Loghlin that O'Loghlin had been invalidly appointed and ordered a supplementary election. Vardon and O'Loghlin both contested the supplementary election, with Vardon winning with 54% of the vote.

<i>Chanter v Blackwood</i>

Chanter v Blackwood and the related case of Maloney v McEacharn were a series of decisions of the High Court of Australia, sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns arising from the 1903 federal election for the seats of Riverina and Melbourne in the House of Representatives. Chanter v Blackwood , and Maloney v McEacharn , determined questions of law as to the validity of certain votes. In Chanter v Blackwood Griffith CJ held that 91 votes were invalid and because this exceeded the majority, the election was void, while Chanter v Blackwood dealt with questions of costs. In Maloney v McEacharn more than 300 votes were found to be invalid and the parties agreed it was appropriate for the election to be declared void.

References

  1. Chanter v Blackwood (No 1) [1904] HCA 2 , (1904) 1 CLR 39 and Chanter v Blackwood (No 2) [1904] HCA 48 , (1904) 1 CLR 121.
  2. Carr, Adam. "1904 Riverina by-election". Psephos: Adam Carr's Election Archive. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
  3. Commonwealth By-elections 1901–82. Canberra: Australian Electoral Office. 1983.