2003 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia

Last updated

The 2003 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 6, 2003, and concluded October 3, 2004. This was the eighteenth term of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia's tenure on the Court. Antonin Scalia, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg
Antonin Scalia 2003 term statistics
9
Majority or Plurality
10
Concurrence
1
Other
12
Dissent
2
Concurrence/dissentTotal = 34
Bench opinions = 30Opinions relating to orders = 4In-chambers opinions = 0
Unanimous opinions: 2 Most joined by: Thomas (14) Least joined by: Souter (4)
TypeCaseCitationIssuesJoined byOther opinions
101



Barnhart v. Thomas 540 U.S. 20 (2003)

Unanimous
302



McConnell v. Federal Election Commission 540 U.S. 93 (2003)

U.S. Const. amend. I   campaign finance reform
Transparent.gif
Stevens and O'Connor
203



Castro v. United States 540 U.S. 375 (2003)

Thomas
Transparent.gif
Breyer
104



Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko LLP 540 U.S. 398 (2004)

Antitrust   telecommunicationsRehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer
Scalia's 6-justice majority ruled that the allegation that an incumbent LEC had breached its duty under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to share its network with competitors failed to state a claim under § 2 of the Sherman Act.
405



General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline 540 U.S. 581 (2004)

Employment discrimination
Transparent.gif
Souter
Scalia dissented from Souter's 6-3 judgment that the EEOC had incorrectly interpreted the ADEA as prohibiting employers from favoring older over younger workers. Scalia would defer to the EEOC, whose regulation he believed was a reasonable interpretation of a statute that did not unambiguously require a different interpretation.
406



Olympic Airways v. Husain 540 U.S. 644 (2004)

Warsaw ConventionO'Connor (in part)
Transparent.gif
Thomas
Scalia dissented from Thomas' 6-2 decision, which he criticized for failing to give any serious consideration to how courts of the partners of the U.S. in the Warsaw Convention had resolved the same legal issues
407



Locke v. Davey 540 U.S. 712 (2004)

Establishment Clause   state funding of religious educationThomas
Transparent.gif
Rehnquist
Scalia dissented from Rehnquist's 7–2 decision. Scalia believed that Washington's scholarship program facially discriminated against religion by excluding only theology from the applicable subjects of study, "no less than if it had imposed a special tax." Scalia believed the plaintiff student was not asking for a "special benefit," but instead sought "only equal treatment."
408



Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver540 U.S. 1027 (2003)

Rehnquist
Scalia dissented from the denial of certiorari.
209



Raymond B. Yates, M.D., P.C. Profit Sharing Plan v. Hendon 541 U.S. 1 (2004)

Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
Scalia believed that the Court "use[d] a sledgehammer to kill a gnat...The Department [of Revenue]'s interpretive conclusion is certainly reasonable (the Court's lengthy analysis says that it is inevitable); it is therefore binding upon us. I would reverse the judgment of the Sixth Circuit on that basis. The Court's approach, which denies many agency interpretations their conclusive effect and thrusts the courts into authoritative judicial interpretation, deprives administrative agencies of two of their principal virtues: (1) the power to resolve statutory questions promptly, and with nationwide effect, and (2) the power (within the reasonable bounds of the text) to change the application of ambiguous laws as time and experience dictate. The Court's approach invites lengthy litigation in all the circuits--the product of which (when finally announced by this Court) is a rule of law that only Congress can change."
110



Crawford v. Washington 541 U.S. 36 (2004)

U.S. Const. amend. VI   Confrontation ClauseStevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
The Court ruled that the use in court of out-of-court statements made to police in an investigative capacity violated the Sixth Amendment right to confront accusing witnesses.
511



Cheney v. United States District Court 540 U.S. 913 (2004)

Recusal
Scalia declined to recuse himself from a case involving Vice-President Cheney, who had recently provided Scalia with a plane ride to a duck-hunting trip. Scalia remarked that "[i]f it is reasonable to think that a Supreme Court Justice can be bought so cheap, the Nation is in deeper trouble than I had imagined." He also did not believe his friendship with the Vice-President demanded recusal, because Cheney's "personal fortune or personal freedom were not at issue," only his official actions in a "run-of-the-mill legal dispute about an administrative decision."
312



S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians 541 U.S. 95 (2004)

Transparent.gif
O'Connor
Scalia also joined the majority's decision in part.
213



Nixon v. Missouri Municipal League 541 U.S. 125 (2004)

Thomas
Transparent.gif
Souter
114



Engine Mfrs. Ass'n v. S. Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. 541 U.S. 246 (2004)

Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
Transparent.gif
Souter
115



Vieth v. Jubelirer 541 U.S. 267 (2004)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Thomas
416



Till v. SCS Credit Corp. 541 U.S. 465 (2004)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy
Transparent.gif
Stevens
417



Tennessee v. Lane 541 U.S. 509 (2004)

Sovereign immunity   U.S. Const. amend. XI   Americans with Disabilities Act
Transparent.gif
Stevens
118



Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L.P. 541 U.S. 567 (2004)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas
219



Thornton v. United States 541 U.S. 615 (2004)

Ginsburg
Transparent.gif
Rehnquist
220



Republic of Austria v. Altmann 541 U.S. 677 (2004)

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Scalia also joined Stevens' 6-3 majority opinion.
221



City of Littleton v. Z. J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C. 541 U.S. 774 (2004)

Transparent.gif
Breyer
422



Bunting v. Mellen541 U.S. 1019 (2004)

U.S. Const. amend. I   Establishment ClauseRehnquist
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Scalia dissented from the denial of certiorari.
223



F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd v. Empagran S. A. 542 U.S. 155 (2004)

Thomas
Transparent.gif
Breyer
224



United States v. Dominguez Benitez 542 U.S. 74 (2004)

Transparent.gif
Souter
125



Norton v. S. Utah Wilderness Alliance 542 U.S. 55 (2004)

Unanimous
226



Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 542 U.S. 241 (2004)

Transparent.gif
Ginsburg
127



Blakely v. Washington 542 U.S. 296 (2004)

U.S. Const. amend. VI   right to jury trialStevens, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg
Scalia wrote for five justices invalidating criminal sentencing system in which judges were the finders of fact for aggravating factors. O'Connor, Kennedy, and Breyer filed dissents.
128



Schriro v. Summerlin 542 U.S. 348 (2004)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas
429



Tennard v. Dretke 542 U.S. 274 (2004)

Transparent.gif
O'Connor
430



Rasul v. Bush 542 U.S. 466 (2004)

Rehnquist, Thomas
Transparent.gif
Stevens
431



Hamdi v. Rumsfeld 542 U.S. 507 (2004)

U.S. Const. amend. V   habeas corpusStevens
Transparent.gif
O'Connor
Scalia wrote that if habeas corpus has not been suspended by Congress, U.S. citizens must be tried in ordinary criminal courts. He believed the plurality was misguided in attempting to fashion alternative procedures that might comply with due process, because the role of the Court was simply to declare that the procedures at issue were unconstitutional.
432



Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union 542 U.S. 656 (2004)

Transparent.gif
Kennedy
233



Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004)

Rehnquist, Thomas
Transparent.gif
Souter
Scalia concurred in part and concurred in the judgment.
434



Cox v. Larios542 U.S. 947 (2004)

Legislative redistricting
Transparent.gif
Stevens
Scalia dissented from the Court's summary affirmance.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United States</span> Highest court of jurisdiction in the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party." The court holds the power of judicial review: the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution. It is also able to strike down presidential directives for violating either the Constitution or statutory law.

This page serves as an index of lists of United States Supreme Court cases. The United States Supreme Court is the highest federal court of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William H. Pryor Jr.</span> American judge (born 1962)

William Holcombe Pryor Jr. is an American lawyer who has served as the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit since 2020. He was appointed as a United States circuit judge of the court by President George W. Bush in 2004. He is a former commissioner of the United States Sentencing Commission. Previously, he was the attorney general of Alabama, from 1997 to 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2003 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The 2003 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 6, 2003, and concluded October 3, 2004. The table illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion.

References