November 6, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
Two-Year State Budget Cycle Initiative | |||||||||||||||||||
| Results | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| No 60-70% 50-60% | |||||||||||||||||||
| [1] | |||||||||||||||||||
The 2012 California Proposition 31 was officially titled "State Budget. State and Local Government. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute." It was a California ballot measure in the November 2012 California elections. The initiative would have established a two-year state budget, allowed the governor to make budget cuts in fiscal emergencies, prevented the state state legislature from spending more than $25 million without creating spending cuts or other budget offsets, and allowed local governments the ability to transfer certain amounts of property taxes among themselves instead of the state. [2] [3] Although the law was supported by the California Republican Party, multiple conservative groups came out against proposition 31, including members of the Tea Party movement who viewed the law as a way to undermine property rights. [4] [5] [6]
If Proposition 31 had passed, it was estimated that the state government would have suffered a loss of $200 million, as these funds would have been transferred to local governments. [7]
| Newspaper | Position |
|---|---|
| Bay Area Reporter [8] | Oppose |
| Fresno Bee [9] | Support |
| Los Angeles Daily News [10] | Support |
| Los Angeles Times [11] | Oppose |
| Modesto Bee [12] | Support |
| Orange County Register [13] | Oppose |
| Sacramento Bee [14] | Oppose |
| San Diego Union-Tribune [15] | Support |
| San Francisco Bay Guardian [16] | Oppose |
| San Francisco Chronicle [17] | Support |
| San Jose Mercury News [18] | Support |
| Ventura County Star [19] | Oppose |