2012 California Proposition 34

Last updated

Proposition 34
Flag of California.svg
November 6, 2012
Repeal of Proposition 17 (Death Penalty)
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes5,974,24348.05%
Light brown x.svg No6,460,26451.95%
2012 California Proposition 34 results map by county.svg
Source: Secretary of State, California

Proposition 34 was a California ballot measure that was decided by California voters at the statewide election on November 6, 2012. It sought to repeal Proposition 17, originally passed by voters in 1972, thus abolishing the death penalty in California.

Contents

The proposition was defeated 52% against to 48% in favor, [1] despite the fact that supporters had spent 6 times more money in the campaign than opponents. [2]

Background

A coalition of law enforcement officials, murder victims’ family members, and wrongly convicted people launched the initiative campaign for the “Savings, Accountability, and Full Enforcement for California Act”, or SAFE California, Prop. 34. [3] If it had been passed by California voters on November 6, 2012, Prop. 34 would have replaced the death penalty with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, require people sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole to work in order to pay restitution to victims’ families, and allocate approximately $30 million per year for three years to police departments for the purpose of solving open murder and rape cases. [4] Prop. 34 was ahead in the most recent Los Angeles Times poll when voters heard about "the financial ramifications and details of [Prop. 34's] effect on prisoners." [5]

On March 1, 2012, the SAFE California Campaign submitted 799,589 signatures to qualify for the election on November 6, 2012. [6] On April 23, 2012, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen announced that the initiative had been approved and would be on the November ballot. [7]

Proponents

Proponents of Prop. 34 cite the cost of implementing the death penalty as a major motivating factor behind the initiative. [8] A 2011 study by former prosecutor and federal judge Arthur Alarcón indicates that California has spent approximately $4 billion to execute 13 people since the death penalty was reinstated. [9] The Legislative Analyst's Office official analysis of the proposition shows that Prop. 34 will likely save taxpayers over 100 million dollars per year. [10]

Proponents of Prop. 34 also cite the possibility of executing an innocent person as a major motivating factor behind the initiative. [11] A recently released study by the Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy at University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, shows that California's rate of wrongful convictions is the highest in the nation. [12]

Supporters of Prop. 34 include:

Opponents

Some Prop. 34 detractors do not believe the studies that indicate that the death penalty in California is more expensive than life in prison without the possibility of parole. [26] Others admit that the system is broken, but hold out hope that it can be fixed, despite the fact that "reform attempts have failed to make it past the California State Legislature." [27]

When proposition 34 was defeated, Michael Rushford, a death penalty supporter, said the election was a call for California officials to "streamline the appeals process, expand the pool of defense attorneys qualified to handle capital cases, and execute inmates with a single lethal drug instead of the three-drug mixture now used". [2]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in California</span> Legal penalty in the US state of California

In the U.S. state of California, capital punishment is a legal penalty. However it is not allowed to be carried out as of March 2019, because executions were halted by an official moratorium ordered by Governor Gavin Newsom. Prior to the moratorium, executions were frozen by a federal court order since 2006, and the litigation resulting in the court order has been on hold since the promulgation of the moratorium. Thus, there will be a court-ordered moratorium on executions after the termination of Newsom's moratorium if capital punishment remains a legal penalty in California by then.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 4</span> Failed ballot proposition on abortion

Proposition 4, or the Abortion Waiting Period and Parental Notification Initiative, also known to its supporters as Sarah's Law, was an initiative state constitutional amendment in the 2008 California general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 8</span> Ballot proposition and state constitutional amendment passed in November 2008

Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court. The proposition was created by opponents of same-sex marriage in advance of the California Supreme Court's May 2008 appeal ruling, In re Marriage Cases, which followed the short-lived 2004 same-sex weddings controversy and found the previous ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Proposition 8 was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by a federal court in 2010, although the court decision did not go into effect until June 26, 2013, following the conclusion of proponents' appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California elections</span>

The California state elections, November 2008 were held on November 4, 2008 throughout California. Among the elections taking place were those for the office of President of the United States, all the seats of California's delegation to the House of Representatives, all of the seats of the State Assembly, and all of the odd-numbered seats of the State Senate. Twelve propositions also appeared on the ballot. Numerous local elections also took place throughout the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 6</span> Rejected statutory initiative

California Proposition 6, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods Act and The Runner Initiative, is a statutory initiative that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. This proposition was rejected by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 5</span> 2008 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 5, or the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act was an initiated state statute that appeared as a ballot measure on the November 2008 ballot in California. It was disapproved by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 7</span> 2008 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 7, would have required California utilities to procure half of their power from renewable resources by 2025. In order to make that goal, levels of production of solar, wind and other renewable energy resources would more than quadruple from their current output of 10.9%. It would also require California utilities to increase their purchase of electricity generated from renewable resources by 2% annually to meet Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requirements of 40% in 2020 and 50% in 2025. Current law AB32 requires an RPS of 20% by 2010.

Marsy's Law, the California Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008, enacted by voters as Proposition 9 through the initiative process in the November 2008 general election, is a controversial amendment to the state's constitution and certain penal code sections. The act protects and expands the legal rights of victims of crime to include 17 rights in the judicial process, including the right to legal standing, protection from the defendant, notification of all court proceedings, and restitution, as well as granting parole boards far greater powers to deny inmates parole. Critics allege that the law unconstitutionally restricts defendant's rights by allowing prosecutors to withhold exculpatory evidence under certain circumstances, and harms victims by restricting their rights to discovery, depositions, and interviews. Passage of this law in California led to the passage of similar laws in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Ohio and Wisconsin, and efforts to pass similar laws in Hawaii, Iowa, Montana, Idaho, South Dakota, and Pennsylvania. In November 2017, Marsy's Law was found to be unconstitutional and void in its entirety by the Supreme Court of Montana for violating that state's procedure for amending the Montana Constitution. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reached the same conclusion as Montana under its own state constitution in 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 23</span> Ballot proposition concerned with environmental regulations

Proposition 23 was a California ballot proposition that was on the November 2, 2010 California statewide ballot. It was defeated by California voters during the statewide election by a 23% margin. If passed, it would have suspended AB 32, a law enacted in 2006, legally referred to its long name, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Sponsors of the initiative referred to their measure as the California Jobs Initiative while opponents called it the Dirty Energy Prop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 2012 California elections</span>

The California state elections was held on Election Day, November 6, 2012. On the ballot were eleven propositions, various parties' nominees for the United States presidency, the Class I Senator to the United States Senate, all of California's seats to the House of Representatives, all of the seats of the State Assembly, and all odd-numbered seats of the State Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 19</span> Failed measure to legalize marijuana

California Proposition 19 was a ballot initiative on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot. It was defeated, with 53.5% of California voters voting "No" and 46.5% voting "Yes." If passed, it would have legalized various marijuana-related activities, allowed local governments to regulate these activities, permitted local governments to impose and collect marijuana-related fees and taxes, and authorized various criminal and civil penalties. In March 2010, it qualified to be on the November statewide ballot. The proposition required a simple majority in order to pass, and would have taken effect the day after the election. Yes on 19 was the official advocacy group for the initiative and California Public Safety Institute: No On Proposition 19 was the official opposition group.

California Proposition 7, or the Death Penalty Act, is a ballot proposition approved in California by statewide ballot on November 7, 1978. Proposition 7 increased the penalties for first degree murder and second degree murder, expanded the list of special circumstances requiring a death sentence or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, and revised existing law relating to mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 California Proposition 39</span> Ballot measure in California modifying corporate tax burdens

Proposition 39 is a ballot initiative in the state of California that modifies the way out-of-state corporations calculate their income tax burdens. The proposition was approved by voters in the November 6 general election, with 61.1% voting in favor of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 64</span> 2016 California voter initiative that legalized recreational cannabis

The Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) was a 2016 voter initiative to legalize cannabis in California. The full name is the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. The initiative passed with 57% voter approval and became law on November 9, 2016, leading to recreational cannabis sales in California by January 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 62</span> 2016 California ballot proposition

Proposition 62 was a California ballot proposition on the November 8, 2016, ballot that would have repealed the death penalty and replaced it with life imprisonment and forced labor without possibility of parole. It would have applied retroactively to existing death sentences and increased the portion of life inmates' wages that may be applied to victim restitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 66</span> 2016 California ballot proposition

Proposition 66 was a California ballot proposition on the November 8, 2016, ballot to change procedures governing California state court challenges to capital punishment in California, designate superior court for initial petitions, limit successive petitions, require appointed attorneys who take noncapital appeals to accept death penalty appeals, and exempt prison officials from existing regulation process for developing execution methods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California elections</span>

The California state elections in 2020 were held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Unlike previous election cycles, the primary elections were held on Super Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 18</span> 2020 California ballot proposition

The 2020 California Proposition 18 would allow 17-year-olds to vote in primary and special elections if they will turn 18 by the subsequent general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 20</span> Rejected initiative regarding non-violent felonies

California Proposition 20 was a proposed initiated state statute on the ballot in the 2020 California elections. This initiative would have added more crimes to the list of non-violent felonies for which early parole is restricted, and would have required DNA collection for certain misdemeanors.

References

  1. ↑ "Statement of Vote – November 6, 2012, General Election" (PDF). California Secretary of State Debra Bowen. p. 13. Retrieved December 31, 2015.
  2. 1 2 [ dead link ]
  3. ↑ "Supporters". SAFE California. Archived from the original on August 26, 2014. Retrieved August 24, 2014.
  4. ↑ "SAFE California | About Prop. 34". SAFE California. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved 2012-11-04.
  5. ↑ "Support for end to California death penalty surges". Archived from the original on December 15, 2012.
  6. ↑ "Death penalty opponents move closer to November ballot initiative". Los Angeles Times. March 1, 2012. Archived from the original on November 13, 2012.
  7. ↑ "Qualified Statewide Ballot Measures". www.sos.ca.gov. Archived from the original on August 29, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  8. ↑ "Costs & Savings". SAFE California. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  9. ↑ Williams, Carol J. (June 20, 2011). "Death penalty costs California $184 million a year, study says". Los Angeles Times.
  10. ↑ "Death Penalty. Initiative Statute" (PDF). vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  11. ↑ "Innocence". SAFE California. Archived from the original on November 4, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  12. ↑ [ dead link ]
  13. 1 2 3 4 "Endorsements from Organizations and Unions (147)". SAFE California. Archived from the original on May 19, 2016. Retrieved July 23, 2017. ][ dead link ]
  14. ↑ "CA Bishops Support Prop 34 to End the Use of the Death Penalty". California Catholic Conference. Archived from the original on October 7, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  15. ↑ "California bishops release statement supporting Proposition 34". Episcopaldigitalnetwork.com. October 10, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  16. ↑ "Jeanne Woodford". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  17. ↑ "Gil Garrett". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  18. ↑ "Franky Carrillo, Jr". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  19. ↑ "Pboe Anthony". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  20. ↑ "Deldelp Medina". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  21. ↑ "Aqeela Sherrills". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  22. ↑ "Don Heller". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  23. 1 2 Nagourney, Adam (April 6, 2012). "Fighting to Repeal California Execution Law They Championed". The New York Times.
  24. ↑ "Ron Briggs". SAFE California. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  25. ↑ Briggs, Ron (February 12, 2012). "California's death penalty law: It simply does not work". Los Angeles Times.
  26. ↑ "California death penalty on November ballot - Associated Press". Politico.Com. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
  27. ↑ "A Cast Of Converts Rallies Around Death Penalty Repeal". Neon Tommy. May 8, 2012. Archived from the original on July 12, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2017.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.