2010 California Proposition 27

Last updated

Proposition 27 was an unsuccessful ballot proposition on the November 2, 2010 ballot in California, placed there by the initiative process. If approved, this measure would have repealed California Proposition 11 (2008), which authorized the creation of the California Citizens Redistricting Commission to draw the electoral boundaries for State Assembly and State Senate districts. It would also have modified the provision in California law that says that proposed congressional districts can not be subjected to a veto referendum. [1]

Contents

According to political journalist Shane Goldmacher, Democratic political strategists said that this initiative was a political tactic to defeat Proposition 20, the Congressional Redistricting Initiative, which was also on the November 2, 2010 ballot: "Democratic political strategists say the best way to ensure a 'no' vote this fall on California Proposition 20 is to confuse the public further with a second ballot measure on the already head spinning topic of political line drawing." [2] This tactic was ultimately unsuccessful, as Proposition 20 passed, extending the commission's power over redistricting to include U.S. House districts.

Proposition 27 and Proposition 20 each had a so-called "poison pill" provision. This meant that if both received a majority vote, the proposition that received the highest majority vote would be the law to go into effect. Since Proposition 20 passed but Proposition 27 did not, neither provision was triggered.

Ballot title and summary

Ballot title:

Financial Accountability in Redistricting Act of 2010"
Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute

Official summary:

Estimated fiscal impact:

Constitutional changes

If Proposition 27 was approved by California's voters, it would have amended some parts of the California Constitution.

Specifically, it will amend:

Supporters

Daniel Lowenstein, the official proponent of the measure, is a professor at UCLA and a former chairman of the California Fair Political Practices Commission. [1]

Although Lowenstein's name was on the application for the initiative, he said that the real sponsors are Democratic members of the U.S. Congress led by Howard Berman and Berman's brother Michael Berman of Berman & D'Agostino Campaigns, [3] a paid consultant for Democrats on redistricting issues. Lowenstein says, "It's Michael and Howard together." [4] Both Daniel Lowenstein and Michael Berman worked on the No on California Proposition 77 (2005) campaign where Mr. Lowenstein was Chairman and Mr. Berman was the committee's campaign consultant. [5] California Proposition 77 (2005) was a previous attempt at independent redistricting reform that failed at the ballot box. Mr. Lowenstein also wrote scholarly articles that highlight Michael Berman and his company. [6] [7]

During the 2001 California redistricting process, U.S. Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez explained how the pre-Proposition 11 Gerrymandering system worked and Michael Berman's importance in the process. "Twenty thousand is nothing to keep your seat. I spend $2 million [campaigning] every year. If my colleagues are smart, they'll pay their $20,000, and Michael [Berman] will draw the district they can win in. Those who have refused to pay? God help them." [8] [9] [10] Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez did not fund Yes on Proposition 27, but her sister [11] U.S. Congresswoman Linda Sanchez was among the members of Congress funding Yes on Proposition 27. However, both Congresswomen Loretta Sanchez and Linda Sanchez did fund [12] the campaign against a previous redistricting measure, California Proposition 77 (2005).

Arguments in favor

Reasons Lowenstein gives to support his measure include:

Arguments were submitted to the official California Voter Guide on behalf of a "yes" vote on Proposition 27, as were rebuttals to the arguments provided by Prop 27 opponents. The signers of these arguments were:

The arguments made by them for publication in the California Voter Guide on behalf of Proposition 27 focus on these themes:

Donors

Haim Saban loaned $2 million to the campaign in mid-April. [14] Saban is in the entertainment business and his personal fortune has been helped along by his association with the Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers. [15] Saban also has media holdings in Israel, Europe, Asia and the United States, including a major stake in Univision, a Spanish-language network. [16] Saban's donation to the effort to overturn Proposition 11 has raised eyebrows, because in 2008, he gave $200,000 to the campaign to pass Proposition 11.

Many of the donors were also big-money donors to the Democratic Party. Others, including Haim Saban, Fred Eychaner, George Soros, Edith Wasserman, Louise Gund, Jack C. Bendheim, Kathryn Hall, and George M. Marcus also contributed between $25,000 up to $25 million to the William J. Clinton Foundation.

Many of the donors supporting Proposition 27 were also major contributors [12] opposing California Proposition 77 (2005), seeking to defeat an earlier proposed redistricting plan. AFSCME spent more than $1,000,000 on both Proposition 77 and on Proposition 27. The largest contribution to No on Proposition 77 was $4,000,000 from Stephen Bing [17] 's Shangri-La Entertainment Company, [18] a major contributor to 527 political organizations. [19] [20] Stephen Bing is not a contributor to Yes on Proposition 27. However, Stephen Bing was the #1 top political contributor in 2002, [21] joined by Haim Saban (#2), Fred Eychaner (#3), Peter G. Angelos (#8), and Louise Gund (#18), who funded both Yes on Proposition 27 and No on Proposition 77.

Through October 20, 2010, these donors have given $20,000 or more to the "Yes on FAIR, Yes on 27--A Coalition of Entrepreneurs, Working People, Businesses, Community Leaders Such as Karen Bass, and Other Concerned Citizens" campaign committee.

(Updated October 20, 2010)

Donor (Affiliation)Amount
Haim Saban (Saban Capital Group, President)$2,000,000
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)$1,250,000
American Federation of Teachers (AFT)$1,000,000
Working 4 Working Americans (associated with the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners [22] )$500,000
Democratic State Central Committee of California$250,000
California State Council of Service Employees Political Issues Committee (SEIU)$200,000
Judy Chu TruPAC$125,000
Charles Calderon for State Assembly Committee $100,000
George Soros $100,000
Peter G. Angelos (Attorney, Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos and majority owner of the Baltimore Orioles baseball team)$100,000
Louise Gund$100,000
Edith Wasserman (Wasserman Foundation, vice-president)$100,000
Fred Eychaner (Newsweb Corporation, Owner)$100,000
Zenith Insurance (Stanley R. Zax, President/Chairman of the Board)$100,000
International Association of Fire Fighters$100,000
Steven S. Myers (Dolphin Capital Holdings, Inc., Chairman/CEO)$100,000
Jack C. Bendheim (Phibro Animal Health Corp., President)$50,000
International Brotherhood of Electric Workers (IBEW) Educational Committee$50,000
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local No. 47$50,000
California State Association of Electrical Workers$50,000
California State Pipe Trades Council of the United Association$50,000
Joseph W. Cotchett (Attorney with Cotchett, Piper & McCarthy)$25,000
Kathryn Hall (Hall Financial Group, Investor; Former Ambassador to Austria, appointed by President Clinton)$25,000
C. Paul Johnson (Astrale e Tierra Winery, CEO)$25,000
Stephen Grand (Grand-Sakwa Properties, real estate investor)$25,000
George M. Marcus (Marcus & Millichap, Chairman; University of California Regent appointed by former Governor Gray Davis)$25,000
Stewart Resnick (Roll International Corp., President and Chairman)$25,000
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 447$25,000
DRIVE Committee (The Teamsters Union)$25,000
Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians [23] $25,000
Lloyd Thomas Galloway (Attorney at Galloway & Associates)$20,000

Note: "Working 4 Working Americans" is described by Capitol Weekly as "a Washington, D.C.-based, labor-backed group." [24]

Donations from individuals

The following table lists the individuals that contributed $20,000 or more to the Yes on Prop. 27 campaign. Many of the top individual donors also are big-money donors to the Democratic Party. The table indicates

(Updated October 11, 2010)

IndividualAffiliation$ Amount to
Yes on Prop. 27
Donor Address
in California?
Donor to
No on Prop. 77
(2005)?
$ Amount to
DSCC (2010)
$ Amount to
DCCC (2010)
$ Amount to
DNC (2010)
$ Amount to
Clinton Foundation
$ Amount to
Obama Inauguration
Affiliation's Position on OpenSecrets.org Heavy Hitters ListAffiliation's % of Contributions Given to Democrats
Haim Saban [29] [30] [31] [32] Saban Capital Group (Chairman/CEO)$2,000,000YesYES$34,400 [33] $30,400-$5M to $10M [34] -#85 [35] 99% [36] [37]
Peter G. Angelos [38] Offices of Peter G. Angelos (Attorney)
Baltimore Orioles Archived 2011-02-02 at the Wayback Machine baseball team (Majority Owner) [39]
$100,000NOYES$40,400 [40] -$30,200---94% [41]
Fred Eychaner [30] [42] [43] Newsweb Corporation(Owner), Alphawood Foundation [44] (Founder and Chairman)$100,000NOYES$30,400 [45] -$15,200$10M to $25M [46] $50,000#100 [47] 100% [48]
Louise Gund [49] Philanthropist, Louise Gund Foundation$100,000NOYES$30,000 [50] $30,400-$50K to $100K [51] ---
Steven S. Myers [52] Dolphin Capital Holdings, Inc. (Chairman/CEO)
SM&A (CEO, Retired)
$100,000YesNo-$30,400$60,400 [53] -$300-52% [54]
George Soros Soros Fund Management (chairman)$100,000NONo-$20,000 [55] $15,200$500K to $1M [56] $200,000
(includes relatives)
-59% [57]
(36% other,
non-Repub.)
Edith WassermanRetired, Wasserman Foundation (Vice-President) [58] $100,000YesYES$35,400 [59] $30,400-$5M to $10M [60] --91% [61]
Stanley R. Zax Zenith Insurance Company (President/Chairman of the Board) $100,000YesNo$10,000 [62] $30,400----91% [63]
Jack C. Bendheim Phibro Animal Health Corp. (President) $50,000NOYES$15,000 [64] $21,300-$25K to $50K [65] --94% [66]
Joseph W. Cotchett Cotchett, Piper & McCarthy (Attorney)$25,000YesNo$30,400 [67] -----99% [68]
Stephen Grand Grand-Sakwa Properties (Real Estate Investor)$25,000YesYES-------
Kathryn Hall Hall Financial Group (Investor)$25,000NOYES$33,600 [69] --$100K to $250K [70] $50,000-100% [71]
C. Paul Johnson Astrale e Terra, (CEO) $25,000YesYES--$30,400 [72] -$3,000-100% [73]
George M. Marcus Marcus & Millichap (Chairman)
University of California (Regent)
$25,000YesYES-$45,600 [74] -$250K to $500K [75] $15,000-91% [76]
Stewart Resnick [77] [78] [79] Roll International Corp. (President and chairman)$25,000YesNo--$15,200 [80] ---67% [81]
Lloyd Thomas Galloway Galloway & Associates (Attorney)$20,000NONo------100% [82]

Donors Haim Saban and Fred Eychaner received prior attention for their multimillion-dollar donations to the Democratic Party. [30]

Donor Haim Saban ...

Donor Peter G. Angelos ...

Donor Fred Eychaner ...

Donor Louise Gund ...

Donor George Soros ...

Donor Kathryn Hall was named Ambassador to Austria by President Clinton. [103]

Donations from unions

Various labor unions have contributed a total $3,325,000 to the Yes on Proposition 27 campaign as of October 21, 2010. The table shows:

(Updated October 21, 2010)

Labor UnionAffiliation$ Amount to
Yes on Prop. 27
Position on
OpenSecrets.org
Top Donors List
 % Dues Given to Democrats NationallyTotal $
Congress Members
also funding
Prop. 27
Donor to
No on Prop. 77
(2005)?
$ Amount to
Clinton Foundation
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) AFL-CIO $1,250,000#2 [105] 98%$864,200YES$250K to $500K [106]
American Federation of Teachers (AFT) AFL-CIO $1,000,000#13 [107] 98%$332,400No$100K to $250K [108]
Working for Working Americans [22] [109] International Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners $500,000#12 [110] 89%$478,200No-
California State Council of Service Employees Political Issues Committee Service Employees International Union (SEIU)$200,000#11 [111] 92%$348,900YES$250K to $500 [112]
International Association of Fire Fighters AFL-CIO $100,000#47 [113] 81%$182,800YES-
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Educational Committee International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW),
AFL-CIO
$50,000#7 [114] 97%$784,500YES$100K to $250K [115]
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local No. 47 International Brotherhood of Electric Workers (IBEW),
AFL-CIO
$50,000#7 [114] 97%$784,500No$100K to $250K [115]
California State Association of Electrical Workers International Brotherhood of Electric Workers (IBEW)$50,000#7 [114] 97%$784,500No$100K to $250K [115]
California State Pipe Trades Council of the United Association [116] [117] Plumbers & Pipefitters Union, AFL-CIO $50,000#44 [118] 94%$451,100No-
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 447 [119] Plumbers & Pipefitters Union, AFL-CIO $25,000#44 [118] 94%$451,100No-
DRIVE Committee Teamsters Union $25,000#10 [120] 93%$691,000No-
Plumbers & Steamfitters Union No. 467 [121] Plumbers & Pipefitters Union, AFL-CIO $10,000#44 [118] 94%$451,100No-

Nationally, the Service Employee International Union (SEIU) ...

The California State Council of Service Employees union, part of the SEIU ...

Politicians who are donors

Members of the U.S. Congress who are donors:

Eighteen Democratic members of California's delegation to the U.S. Congress, including Nancy Pelosi, cumulatively gave $175,000 to the initiative effort in February 2010, when the campaign needed funds to pay petition circulators to collect signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot. [128] Proposition 20, the Congressional Redistricting Initiative, which is also on the November 2, 2010 ballot in California is what motivated the round of donations from congressional representatives, according to some pundits. [129]

California has 54 seats in the U.S. Congress. Heading into the November 2, 2010 election, 34 of those seats are held by Democrats. As of October 11, 2001, 18 (nearly 53%) of those incumbent Democratic members of California's delegation to the U.S. Congress had given money to the campaign to urge a "yes" vote on Proposition 27.

No members of the state's other party delegations have, as of October 21, 2010, given money to the "Yes on 27" committee.

The 18 Democratic incumbent Congress Members who either gave money directly to the campaign, whose campaign committees gave money, or whose affiliated political action committee gave money to Proposition 27 are listed below. The table indicates ...

(Updated October 21, 2010)

Congress MemberCalifornia
Congressional
District
Political
Party
$ Amount to
Yes on Prop. 27
Congressional
Progressive
Caucus
Member?
Donor to
No on
Prop. 77
(2005)?
Career Campaign $
from Unions
Supporting Prop. 27
 % Contributions from
Outside California
 % Contributions from
PACs
Howard Berman CA-28 Democrat $10,000NoYES$126,500 [130] 19% [131] 35%
Lois Capps CA-23 Democrat $10,000NoYES$387,000 [132] 11% [133] 48%
Judy Chu CA-32 Democrat $225,000+YESNo$87,800 [134] 4% [135] 31%
Anna Eshoo CA-14 Democrat $10,000NoYES$158,100 [136] 13% [137] 54%
Sam Farr CA-17 Democrat $10,000YESYES$354,200 [138] 15% [139] 66%
Mike Honda CA-15 Democrat $10,000YESYES$206,200 [138] 23% [140] 42%
Barbara Lee CA-9 Democrat $10,000YESYES$238,100 [141] 17% [142] 39%
Zoe Lofgren CA-16 Democrat $10,000NoYES$191,000 [143] 12% [144] 54%
Nancy Pelosi CA-28 Democrat $10,000YES
(Former)
YES$347,400 [145] 30% [146] 55%
Doris Matsui CA-5 Democrat $10,000NoNo$108,000 [147] 44% [148] 56%
George Miller CA-7 Democrat $10,000YESYES$427,900 [149] 52% [150] 68%
Laura Richardson CA-9 Democrat $5,000YESNo$155,800 [151] 22% [152] 81%
Lucille Roybal-Allard CA-34 Democrat $10,000YESYES$288,000 [153] 24% [154] 58%
Linda Sánchez CA-39 Democrat $25,000YESYES$184,800 [155] 27% [156] 57%
Adam Schiff CA-29 Democrat $10,000NoYES$157,000 [157] 13% [158] 41%
Jackie Speier CA-12 Democrat $10,000NoNo$64,500 [159] 4% [160] 31%
Diane Watson CA-33 Democrat $10,000YESYES$147,000 [161] 18% [162] 53%
Lynn Woolsey CA-6 Democrat $5,000YES
(Co-Chair)
YES$504,200 [163] 8% [164] 54%

Opposition

Opponents

Arguments against

Arguments were submitted to the official California Voter Guide urging a "no" vote on Proposition 27, as were rebuttals to the arguments provided by Prop 27 supporters. The signers of these arguments were:

The themes of the main arguments they make against Proposition 27 (and in favor of Proposition 20) are:

Donors against

There is no committee directly opposing Proposition 27. However, there is a committee called "Yes on 20, No on 27--Hold Politicians Accountable, A Coalition of Taxpayers, Seniors, Good Government Groups, Small Business and Community Organizers" whose aim is to pass Proposition 20, a competing ballot measure, and defeat Proposition 27. Because Proposition 27 contains "poison pill" language countering Proposition 27, any money spent to promote a "Yes" vote on Proposition 20 might be considered money spent to oppose Proposition 27, and vice versa.

Charles T. Munger Jr. and his wife Charlotte Lowell are the primary driving force behind Proposition 20 and are its primary funder. [168] Charles T. Munger Jr. is the son of Charles T. Munger Sr., a vice-president at Berkshire Hathaway.

Donors of $20,000 and over to "Yes on 20, No on 27" through October 21 are listed below. The table shows ...

(Updated October 21, 2010)

Individual/OrganizationAffiliation$ Amount to
Yes on Prop. 20
No on Prop. 27
Donor Address
in California?
Charles T. Munger Jr. [171] Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (Physicist), Self-Employed$11,177,603YES
Charolette A. LowellAttorney, Self-Employed$956,001YES
Diane B. Wisely [172] A. Wisely Properties (Executive)$100,000YES
California Business Political Action Committee (CALBUSPAC) California Chamber of Commerce $85,000YES
William BloomfieldRetired$50,000YES
Susan L. Groff Northwest Excavating (Contractor)$50,000YES
Rebecca Q. MoranRetired$50,000YES
Geoffrey C. RusackAttorney$20,000YES
Small Business Political Action Committee-$20,000YES

All major donors to "Yes on 20, No on 27" are from California, unlike the donors supporting Proposition 27.

Editorial opinion

NewspaperRecommended Vote
on Prop. 27
Bakersfield Californian NO
Contra Costa Times NO
Fresno Bee NO
L.A. Weekly NO
Lompoc Record NO
Long Beach Press-Telegram NO
Los Angeles Daily News NO
Los Angeles Times NO
Marin Independent Journal NO
Monterey Herald NO
North County Times NO
Oakland TribuneNO
Orange County Register NO
Riverside Press-Enterprise NO
Sacramento Bee NO
San Bernardino Sun NO
San Diego Union-Tribune NO
San Francisco Bay Guardian YES
San Francisco Chronicle NO
San Francisco Examiner [ permanent dead link ]NO
San Gabriel Valley Tribune NO
San José Mercury-News NO
Santa Cruz Sentinel NO
Santa Rosa Press-Democrat NO
USA TODAY Implied NO
Ventura County Star NO

Yes on Prop 27

Newspapers that have editorialized in favor of Proposition 27 include:

No on Prop 27

Newspapers that have editorialized against Proposition 27 include:

Campaign finance complaint

Supporters of the Voters FIRST Act for Congress have asked the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Federal Elections Commission to investigate whether some members of California's U.S. Congressional delegation are "hiding their controlling involvement in the initiative" in a way that obscures who is really behind it. [167]

Path to the ballot

On December 28, 2009, Daniel Lowenstein filed a request with the Office of the California Attorney General for an official ballot title.

The official ballot title was provided on February 5, 2010.

Signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot were collected by Kimball Petition Management at a cost of $2,820,124. [190]

Results

Proposition 27 [191]
ChoiceVotes %
Light brown x.svg No5,457,94059.4
Yes3,729,61240.6
Total votes9,187,552100.00

Basic information

Supporters

Opponents

Further reading

Related Research Articles

A 527 organization or 527 group is a type of U.S. tax-exempt organization organized under Section 527 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. A 527 group is created primarily to influence the selection, nomination, election, appointment or defeat of candidates to federal, state or local public office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Campaign finance in the United States</span> Contributions to American election campaign funds

The financing of electoral campaigns in the United States happens at the federal, state, and local levels by contributions from individuals, corporations, political action committees, and sometimes the government. Campaign spending has risen steadily at least since 1990. For example, a candidate who won an election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1990 spent on average $407,600, while the winner in 2022 spent on average $2.79 million; in the Senate, average spending for winning candidates went from $3.87 million to $26.53 million.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Haim Saban</span> Israeli–American media proprietor, investor

Haim Saban is an Israeli-American media proprietor, investor, musical composer and producer of records, film, and television. A businessman with interests in financial services, entertainment, and media, and an estimated net worth of $2.8 billion, he is ranked by Forbes as the 232nd richest person in America. Saban is the founder of Saban Entertainment, producer and distributor of children's television programs in the US such as Power Rangers. He headed up consortiums which purchased the broadcasters ProSiebenSat.1 Media and Univision Communications. He is a major donor to the United States Democratic Party and active in pro-Israel political efforts in the United States. In March 2017, Saban was honored with the 2,605th star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame for his achievements in television.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 California Proposition 87</span>

California Proposition 87 was a proposition on the ballot for California voters for the November 7, 2006 general election, officially titled Alternative Energy. Research, Production, Incentives. Tax on California Oil Producers. It was rejected by the voters, 54.7% opposed to 45.3% in favor. This was highest-funded campaign on any state ballot and surpassing every campaign in the country in spending except the presidential contest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 4</span> Failed ballot proposition on abortion

Proposition 4, or the Abortion Waiting Period and Parental Notification Initiative, also known to its supporters as Sarah's Law, was an initiative state constitutional amendment in the 2008 California general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 8</span> Successful referendum on banning same-sex marriage

Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court. The proposition was created by opponents of same-sex marriage in advance of the California Supreme Court's May 2008 appeal ruling, In re Marriage Cases, which followed the short-lived 2004 same-sex weddings controversy and found the previous ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Proposition 8 was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by a federal court in 2010, although the court decision did not go into effect until June 26, 2013, following the conclusion of proponents' appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 6</span>

California Proposition 6, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods Act and The Runner Initiative, is a statutory initiative that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. This proposition was rejected by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 3</span>

Proposition 3, the Children's Hospital Bond Act of 2008, is a law that was enacted by California voters by means of the initiative process. It is a bond issue that authorizes $980 million in bonds, to be repaid from state's General Fund, to fund the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping of children's hospitals. The annual payment on the debt authorized by the initiative is approximately $64 million a year. Altogether, the measure would cost about $1.9 billion over 30 years out of California's general fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 5</span>

California Proposition 5, or the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act was an initiated state statute that appeared as a ballot measure on the November 2008 ballot in California. It was disapproved by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 11</span>

Proposition 11 of 2008 was a law enacted by California voters that placed the power to draw electoral boundaries for State Assembly and State Senate districts in a Citizens Redistricting Commission, as opposed to the State Legislature. To do this the Act amended both the Constitution of California and the Government Code. The law was proposed by means of the initiative process and was put to voters as part of the November 4, 2008 state elections. In 2010, voters passed Proposition 20 which extended the Citizen Redistricting Commission's power to draw electoral boundaries to include U.S. House seats as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 7</span>

California Proposition 7, would have required California utilities to procure half of their power from renewable resources by 2025. In order to make that goal, levels of production of solar, wind and other renewable energy resources would more than quadruple from their current output of 10.9%. It would also require California utilities to increase their purchase of electricity generated from renewable resources by 2% annually to meet Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requirements of 40% in 2020 and 50% in 2025. Current law AB32 requires an RPS of 20% by 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California elections</span>

The California state elections, November 2010 were held on November 2, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 20</span> Approved Congressional Redistricting Initiative

A California Congressional Redistricting Initiative, Proposition 20 was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in California. It was approved by 61.2% of voters. Election officials announced on May 5 that the proposition had collected sufficient signatures to qualify for the ballot. The measure is known by its supporters as the VOTERS FIRST Act for Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 2012 California elections</span>

The California state elections was held on Election Day, November 6, 2012. On the ballot were eleven propositions, various parties' nominees for the United States presidency, the Class I Senator to the United States Senate, all of California's seats to the House of Representatives, all of the seats of the State Assembly, and all odd-numbered seats of the State Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 California Proposition 32</span>

Proposition 32 is a California ballot measure that was decided by California voters at the statewide election on November 6, 2012. This initiative statute would have affected political contributions via payroll deductions, and contributions to political candidates. The proposition was defeated by voters by a margin of 56 to 44 percent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redistricting in California</span> Redistricting of Californias districts for the U.S. House of Representatives

Redistricting in California has historically been highly controversial. Critics have accused legislators of attempting to protect themselves from competition by gerrymandering districts. Conflicts between the governor and the legislature during redistricting often have only been resolved by the courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 16</span> Measure to undo the states ban on affirmative action

Proposition 16 was a failed California ballot proposition that appeared on the November 3, 2020, general election ballot, asking California voters to amend the Constitution of California to repeal Proposition 209 (1996). Proposition 209 amended the state constitution to prohibit government institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public employment, public contracting, and public education. Therefore, Proposition 209 banned the use of race- and gender-based affirmative action in California's public sector and public university admissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 15</span> Initiative to provide education funding

California Proposition 15 was a failed citizen-initiated proposition on the November 3, 2020, ballot. It would have provided $6.5 billion to $11.5 billion in new funding for public schools, community colleges, and local government services by creating a "split roll" system that increased taxes on large commercial properties by assessing them at market value, without changing property taxes for small business owners or residential properties for homeowners or renters. The measure failed by a small margin of about four percentage points.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 21</span> Ballot measure on rent control

Proposition 21, an initiative statute for local rent control officially called the Expands Local Governments’ Authority to Enact Rent Control on Residential Property, was a California ballot proposition that appeared on the ballot for the general election on November 3, 2020 and was rejected. If approved, it would allow local governments to establish rent control on residential properties that have been occupied for over 15 years. It would also allow landlords who own no more than two homes to exempt themselves from such policies. This would essentially repeal some of the provisions in the 1995 Costa–Hawkins Rental Housing Act. Proposition 21 was rejected by 60% of California voters, just like Proposition 10 was before it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 California Proposition 1</span> Successful referendum on enshrining reproductive rights in the state constitution

Proposition 1, titled Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom and initially known as Senate Constitutional Amendment 10 (SCA 10), was a California ballot proposition and state constitutional amendment that was voted on in the 2022 general election on November 8. Passing with more than two-thirds of the vote, the proposition amended the Constitution of California to explicitly grant the right to an abortion and contraceptives, making California among the first states in the nation to codify the right. The decision to propose the codification of abortion rights in the state constitution was precipitated in May 2022 by Politico's publishing of a leaked draft opinion showing the United States Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The decision reversed judicial precedent that previously held that the United States Constitution protected the right to an abortion.

References

  1. 1 2 "KQED-TV, "Give Redistricting Back To Legislature?", December 29, 2009". Archived from the original on October 11, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  2. 1 2 "Political & Legal News - Politics & Law". Politics and Law.
  3. "Berman & D'Agostino Campaigns Beverly Hills CA, 90211 – Manta.com".
  4. "Sacramento Bee, "Ballot fight looms on California redistricting", January 18, 2010".[ permanent dead link ]
  5. "Election Law: "No on 77" White Paper". electionlawblog.org.
  6. "'The Journal of Law & Politics', The Stealth Campaign: Experimental Studies of Slate Mail in California, Spring 2001" (PDF).
  7. "'Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review', Election Law as a Subject, June 1999" (PDF).
  8. Mother Jones, "Gerrymandering: Why Your Vote Doesn't Count", September, 2006
  9. Christian Science Monitor, "Redistricting abuses voter trust", January 7, 2002
  10. The Orange County Register, "Editorial: Prop. 27 would strangle redistricting reform in the cradle", September 3, 2010
  11. "CNN, "Linda and Loretta Sanchez: First sisters in Congress"". Archived from the original on 2011-09-17. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 California Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance: A COALITION OF LEGAL EXPERTS, FILMMAKERS, BUSINESSMEN, AND WORKING PEOPLE. MAJOR FUNDING BY SHANGRI-LA ENTERTAINMENT, LLC & AMERICAN FAMILY VOICES - NO ON 77 "
  13. Letter to Attorney General requesting ballot title
  14. "Sacramento Bee, "Schwarzenegger fights to protect his climate-change and redistricting legacy", April 26, 2010". Archived from the original on April 29, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  15. "Sacramento Bee, "Haim Saban loans $2 million to effort to repeal Prop. 11", April 12, 2010". Archived from the original on September 3, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  16. "Sacramento Bee, "Donors give millions, hide their motives", April 18, 2010". Archived from the original on November 5, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  17. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  18. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  19. OpenSecrets.org, "Top Individual Contributors to Federally Focused 527 Organizations, 2004 Election Cycle", #3 on list.
  20. OpenSecrets.org, "Top Individual Contributors to Federally Focused 527 Organizations, 2008 Election Cycle", #4 on list.
  21. 1 2 3 "Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  22. 1 2 "Working for Working Americans: Top Contributors, 2008 Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  23. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  24. "Capitol Weekly, "Incumbent Democrats open wallets to abolish redistricting commission", September 2, 2010". Archived from the original on October 8, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  25. 1 2 3 California Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance: YES ON FAIR, YES ON 27--A COALITION OF ENTREPERNEURS, WORKING PEOPLE, BUSINESSES, COMMUNITY LEADERS SUCH AS KAREN BASS, AND OTHER CONCERNED CITIZENS DEVOTED TO ELIMINATING BUREAUCRATIC WASTE OF TAX..."
  26. 1 2 3 "Campaign Contributions to Yes On Fair, Yes On 27, No On 20--a Coalition Of Entreperneurs, Working People, Businesses, Community Leaders Such As Karen Bass, & Other Concerned Citizens Devoted To Eliminating Bureaucratic Waste." electiontrack.com.
  27. "OpenSecrets.org, "Barack Obama Inauguration Donors"". Archived from the original on 2010-08-18. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  28. 1 2 3 "Top Organization Contributors - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  29. "Saban gives $2 million to change redistricting law". 12 April 2010.
  30. 1 2 3 New York Times, "Soft Money Lives: Democrats Take In $12 Million (2 Gifts)", March, 2002
  31. DAUNT, TINA (22 April 2009). "Haim Saban, friend to Israel and Democrats" via Los Angeles Times.
  32. Portfolio Magazine, "Haim Saban, Power Ranger"
  33. "Haim Saban - $127,600 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  34. "Haim Saban and The Saban Family Foundation donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2011-09-17. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  35. "Saban Capital Group: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  36. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  37. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  38. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  39. Los Angeles Times, "Pro football: Orioles' majority owner, leading figure in Baltimore's effort to attract an NFL team, is in Los Angeles for informal meetings.", May 13, 1994
  40. "Peter Angelos - $163,860 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  41. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  42. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  43. Armstrong, David. "A Long Strange Trip". Forbes.[ dead link ]
  44. "Aidpage, "Alphawood Foundation Profile"". Archived from the original on 2011-07-07. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  45. "Fred Eychaner - $389,300 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  46. "Fred Eychaner donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2011-12-10. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  47. "Newsweb Corp: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  48. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  49. Oregon Shakespeare Festival, "Meet the Board: Louise Gund"
  50. "Louise Gund - $127,400 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  51. "Louise Gund donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  52. "Forbes, "Steven S. Myers Profile"". Archived from the original on 2009-04-14. Retrieved 2017-08-25.
  53. "Steven Myers - $127,100 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  54. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  55. "George Soros - $150,800 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  56. "Soros Foundation donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2011-12-10. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  57. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  58. "About the Foundation: History". The Wasserman Foundation. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  59. "Edith Wasserman - $99,400 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  60. "Wasserman Foundation donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  61. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  62. "Stanley Zax - $80,800 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  63. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  64. "Jack Bendheim - $83,554 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  65. "Jack C. Bendheim donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  66. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  67. "Joseph Cotchett - $97,700 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  68. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  69. "Kathryn Hall - $116,343 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  70. "Kathryn and Craig Hall donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  71. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  72. "HuffPost - Breaking News, U.S. and World News". huffingtonpost.com.
  73. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  74. "George Marcus - $396,200 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  75. "George M. Marcus donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  76. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  77. "Political Friendster, "Stewart Resnick"".
  78. "Muckety.com, "Stewart A. Resnick"". Archived from the original on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  79. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  80. "Stewart Resnick - $63,900 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  81. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  82. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  83. "Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  84. 1 2 "Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  85. "Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  86. "Rep. Nancy Pelosi - California District 08". OpenSecrets.
  87. "527 Search: By Donor Name - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  88. "Top Individual Contributors to Federally Focused 527 Organizations, 2010 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  89. "Contribution to EMILY's List Political Action Committee Raises Questions of Legality And Hints of Things to Come". OpenSecrets.
  90. "527 Search: By Donor Name - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  91. "Chicago Sun-Times, "Michelle Obama predicts her husband will be 'amazing' in debate"". Archived from the original on 2010-07-18. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  92. Washington Post, "Donors Who Gave $10,000 to Clinton Legal Defense Fund"
  93. Perks, Ashley (30 September 2010). "Appointments". The Hill.
  94. "Our Board of Trustees". Earthjustice. 7 April 2010.
  95. "527 Search: By Donor Name - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  96. "Top Individual Contributors to Federally Focused 527 Organizations, 2008 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  97. "George Soros Contributions to 527 Organizations, 2008 cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  98. "Top Individual Contributors to Federally Focused 527 Organizations, 2006 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  99. "George Soros Contributions to 527 Organizations, 2006 cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  100. "Top Individual Contributors to Federally Focused 527 Organizations, 2004 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  101. "George Soros Contributions to 527 Organizations, 2004 cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  102. "527 Search: By Donor Name - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  103. "Council of American Ambassadors, "Kathryn Walt Hall, Ambassadorial Post"". Archived from the original on 2010-10-25. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  104. 1 2 "editgrid.com". www6.editgrid.com.
  105. "American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  106. "AFSCME donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  107. "American Federation of Teachers: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  108. "AFT donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  109. "Working for Working Americans: Overview - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  110. "Carpenters & Joiners Union: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  111. "Service Employees International Union: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  112. "New York's Health & Human Service Union, 1199/SEIU donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  113. "International Assn of Fire Fighters: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  114. 1 2 3 "Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  115. 1 2 3 "International Brotherhood of Electric Workers donation to William J. Clinton Foundation". Archived from the original on 2012-10-11. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  116. "OpenSecrets.org, "HEAVY HITTERS: Plumbers & Pipefitters Union Affiliates"". Archived from the original on 2009-07-26. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  117. "California State Pipe Trades Council Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  118. 1 2 3 "Plumbers & Pipefitters Union: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  119. "Plumbers/Pipefitters Union Local 447 Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  120. "Teamsters Union: Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  121. "Plumbers/Pipefitters Union Local 467 Summary - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  122. "Top Organization Contributions to 527 Committtes, 2004 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  123. "Top Organization Contributions to 527 Committtes, 2006 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  124. "Top Organization Contributions to 527 Committtes, 2008 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  125. "Top Organization Contributions to 527 Committtes, 2010 Election Cycle - OpenSecrets". opensecrets.org.
  126. Creek, The (18 October 2010). "Creekside Chat: The Big Spenders Behind the Scenes".
  127. 1 2 California Fair Political Practices Commission, "Big Money Talks: California's Billion Dollar Club" Archived 2010-11-03 at the Wayback Machine , page 10, "The 15 That Spent $1 Billion to Influence California Voters and Public Officials"
  128. "None".
  129. "Nancy Pelosi, congressional Democrats weigh in on redistricting measure". 12 February 2010.
  130. "Rep. Howard L Berman - California". OpenSecrets.
  131. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  132. "Rep. Lois Capps - California". OpenSecrets.
  133. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  134. "Rep. Judy Chu - California District 27". OpenSecrets.
  135. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  136. "Rep. Anna Eshoo - California District 18". OpenSecrets.
  137. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  138. 1 2 "Rep. Sam Farr - California". OpenSecrets.
  139. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  140. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  141. "Rep. Barbara Lee - California District 13". OpenSecrets.
  142. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  143. "Rep. Zoe Lofgren - California District 19". OpenSecrets.
  144. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  145. "Rep. Nancy Pelosi - California District 12". OpenSecrets.
  146. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  147. "Rep. Doris O Matsui - California District 06". OpenSecrets.
  148. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  149. "Rep. George Miller - California District 11". OpenSecrets.
  150. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  151. "Rep. Laura Richardson - California". OpenSecrets.
  152. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  153. "Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard - California District 40". OpenSecrets.
  154. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  155. "Rep. Linda Sanchez - California District 38". OpenSecrets.
  156. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  157. "Rep. Adam Schiff - California District 28". OpenSecrets.
  158. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  159. "Rep. Jackie Speier - California District 14". OpenSecrets.
  160. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  161. "Rep. Diane E. Watson - California". OpenSecrets.
  162. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  163. "Rep. Lynn Woolsey - California". OpenSecrets.
  164. "influenceexplorer.com". influenceexplorer.com.
  165. Diaz, John (31 January 2010). "Legislators cling to their perks and power". SFGate.
  166. "Daily Breeze, "Reclaiming redistricting", February 22, 2010". Archived from the original on September 2, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  167. 1 2 "Fox and Hounds Daily, "Politicians' Ongoing Quest to Avoid Accountability", April 23, 2010". Archived from the original on September 24, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  168. "California Watch". californiawatch.org. Archived from the original on 2010-10-24. Retrieved 2010-10-26.
  169. 1 2 "Campaign Contributions to Yes On 40 - Hold Politicians Accountable". electiontrack.com.
  170. 1 2 California Secretary of State, "YES ON 20, NO ON 27 - HOLD POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE: Late and $5000+ Contributions Received"
  171. "Charles Munger - $23,270 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  172. "Diane Wilsey - $97,600 in Political Contributions for 2010". campaignmoney.com.
  173. San Francisco Bay Guardian, "Endorsements 2010: State ballot measures", October 5, 2010
  174. "San Bernardino Sun, "Editorial: Worth repeating: No on Prop. 27", October 25, 2010". Archived from the original on November 9, 2010. Retrieved October 26, 2010.
  175. "Contra Costa Times editorial: We recommend yes on Proposition 20, no on 27". 3 September 2010.
  176. "Props. 20, 27: The flip sides of real change". Lompoc Record.
  177. "Los Angeles Daily News, "Vote yes on Prop. 20, no on Prop. 27 for a much improved political system", September 14, 2010". Archived from the original on October 13, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  178. "Drawing the lines". 24 September 2010 via Los Angeles Times.
  179. "Long Beach Press-Telegram, "Yes on Prop. 20, no on Prop. 27", September 13, 2010". Archived from the original on October 24, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  180. "Editorial: Prop: 20: Extend redistricting reform to Congress". 17 September 2010.
  181. "Riverside Press Enterprise, "Yes on 20; no on 27", September 7, 2010".
  182. Board, The San Diego Union-Tribune Editorial. "Redistricting reforms must advance". sandiegouniontribune.com.
  183. "San Bernardino Sun, "Vote to improve our government", September 28, 2010". Archived from the original on October 13, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  184. "Sacramento Bee, "Leave redistricting reform alone - No on Propositions 20 and 27", September 17, 2010". Archived from the original on September 28, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  185. "North County". San Diego Union-Tribune.
  186. "Santa Rose Press Democrat, "Yes on Prop. 20, no on 27"". Archived from the original on 2010-12-23. Retrieved 2010-10-11.
  187. "Santa Cruz Sentinel, "As We See It: Yes on 20, No on 27", October 3, 2010". Archived from the original on October 6, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  188. "San Gabriel Valley Tribune, "No on Prop. 27: Don't let pols usurp people", October 9, 2010". Archived from the original on October 13, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
  189. "Ventura County Star, "Prop. 20: Yes Prop. 27: No way", September 2, 2010".
  190. List of "Yes on Proposition 27" campaign expenditures
  191. "For the November 2, 2010, Statewide General Election County Summary Status". California Secretary of State's office. November 3, 2010. p. 37. Archived from the original on November 5, 2014. Retrieved November 3, 2010.