2014 California Proposition 45

Last updated

Proposition 45, also known as Prop 45 and the Insurance Rate Public Justification and Accountability Act, [1] was a California ballot proposition that required any health insurance rate change to be approved by the state's Insurance Commissioner before it goes into effect. It failed in the November 2014 California elections. Insurance companies would be required to submit information to justify their rate change. The proposition also would have put in place procedures for public notice, disclosure, hearing, and subsequent judicial review for the process of the rate change being approved. [2] The proposition was similar to 1988 California Proposition 103, in that it imposed the same things on health care insurers that the 1988 proposition imposed on homeowners insurance and automobile insurance. [3] Sponsors of the proposition had originally tried to get the proposition on the November 2012 California election ballot and turned in over 800,000 signatures on May 18, 2012. [4] On June 28, 2012, it was determined that there would not be enough time to confirm the validity of the signatures in time for the November election. It was announced on August 23, 2012 that the measure would be on the November 2014 ballot. [1] The proposition was supported by Dianne Feinstein, [5] Barbara Boxer, [1] CREDO Action [6] and Dennis Quaid. [7] Opponents of the measure include the California Republican Party, [8] California Hospital Association, NAACP California, California Chamber of Commerce and California Medical Association. [1]

Results

Result [1] VotesPercentage
Yes2,917,88241.08
No4,184,41658.92

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1978 California Proposition 13</span> Ballot initiative which capped property tax at 1% and yearly increases at 2%

Proposition 13 is an amendment of the Constitution of California enacted during 1978, by means of the initiative process. The initiative was approved by California voters on June 6, 1978 by a nearly two to one margin. It was upheld as constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 (1992). Proposition 13 is embodied in Article XIII A of the Constitution of the State of California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1994 California Proposition 187</span> Ballot initiative

California Proposition 187 was a 1994 ballot initiative to establish a state-run citizenship screening system and prohibit illegal immigrants from using non-emergency health care, public education, and other services in the State of California. Voters passed the proposed law at a referendum on November 8, 1994. The law was challenged in a legal suit the day after its passage, and found unconstitutional by a federal district court on November 11. In 1999, Governor Gray Davis halted state appeals of this ruling.

The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) of 1975 was a statute enacted by the California Legislature in September 1975 (and signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown in September), which was intended to lower medical malpractice liability insurance premiums for healthcare providers in that state by decreasing their potential tort liability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 California Proposition 85</span> 2006 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 85, the Parental Notification Initiative, was a proposition on the ballot for California voters in the general election of November 7, 2006. It was similar to the previous year's Proposition 73. It failed by a vote of 46%-54%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 California Proposition 218</span> Referendum on taxation

Proposition 218 is an adopted initiative constitutional amendment which revolutionized local and regional government finance and taxation in California. Named the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," it was sponsored by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as a constitutional follow-up to the landmark property tax reduction initiative constitutional amendment, Proposition 13, approved in June 1978. Proposition 218 was approved and adopted by California voters during the November 5, 1996, statewide general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 4</span> Failed ballot proposition on abortion

Proposition 4, or the Abortion Waiting Period and Parental Notification Initiative, also known to its supporters as Sarah's Law, was an initiative state constitutional amendment in the 2008 California general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 8</span>

Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court. The proposition was created by opponents of same-sex marriage in advance of the California Supreme Court's May 2008 appeal ruling, In re Marriage Cases, which followed the short-lived 2004 same-sex weddings controversy and found the previous ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Proposition 8 was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by a federal court in 2010, although the court decision did not go into effect until June 26, 2013, following the conclusion of proponents' appeals.

Consumer Watchdog is a non-profit, progressive organization which advocates for taxpayer and consumer interests, with a focus on insurance, health care, political reform, privacy and energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California elections</span>

The California state elections, November 2010 were held on November 2, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 23</span> Referendum on environmental regulations

Proposition 23 was a California ballot proposition that was on the November 2, 2010 California statewide ballot. It was defeated by California voters during the statewide election by a 23% margin. If passed, it would have suspended AB 32, a law enacted in 2006, legally referred to its long name, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Sponsors of the initiative referred to their measure as the California Jobs Initiative while opponents called it the Dirty Energy Prop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harvey Rosenfield</span> American lawyer

Harvey Rosenfield is an American lawyer, author and consumer advocate. In 1985, he founded Consumer Watchdog, a nationally recognized, nonpartisan nonprofit public interest group. He serves as the group's counsel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 2012 California elections</span>

The California state elections was held on Election Day, November 6, 2012. On the ballot were eleven propositions, various parties' nominees for the United States presidency, the Class I Senator to the United States Senate, all of California's seats to the House of Representatives, all of the seats of the State Assembly, and all odd-numbered seats of the State Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 California Proposition 30</span> Referendum on taxes

Proposition 30, officially titled Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, is a California ballot measure that was decided by California voters at the statewide election on November 6, 2012. The initiative is a measure to increase taxes to prevent US$6 billion cuts to the education budget for California state schools. The measure was approved by California voters by a margin of 55 to 45 percent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 California elections</span>

In California state elections, 2014 was the first year in which the top statewide offices were elected under the nonpartisan blanket primary, pursuant to Proposition 14, which passed with 53% voter approval in June 2010. Under this system, which first went into effect during the 2012 election year, all candidates appear on the same ballot, regardless of party. In the primary, voters may vote for any candidate, regardless of their party affiliation. The top two finishers, regardless of party, then advance to face each other in the general election in November.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 64</span> Referendum on recreational cannabis

The Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) was a 2016 voter initiative to legalize cannabis in California. The full name is the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. The initiative passed with 57% voter approval and became law on November 9, 2016, leading to recreational cannabis sales in California by January 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 6</span>

California Proposition 6 was a measure that was submitted to California voters as part of the November 2018 election. The ballot measure proposed a repeal of the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which is also known as Senate Bill 1. The measure failed with about 57% of the voters against and 43% in favor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 15</span> Initiative to provide education funding

California Proposition 15 was a failed citizen-initiated proposition on the November 3, 2020, ballot. It would have provided $6.5 billion to $11.5 billion in new funding for public schools, community colleges, and local government services by creating a "split roll" system that increased taxes on large commercial properties by assessing them at market value, without changing property taxes for small business owners or residential properties for homeowners or renters. The measure failed by a small margin of about four percentage points.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 22</span> Gig economy workers employment status ballot initiative

Proposition 22 was a ballot initiative in California that became law after the November 2020 state election, passing with 59% of the vote and granting app-based transportation and delivery companies an exception to Assembly Bill 5 by classifying their drivers as "independent contractors", rather than "employees". The law exempts employers from providing the full suite of mandated employee benefits while instead giving drivers new protections:

Proposition 2, also known as Prop 2 or Changes to State Budget Stabilization Fund Amendment, was a 2014 California ballot proposition that would require 1.5% of general fund revenues and a number that is equal to revenues that come from capital gains-related taxes when those tax revenues exceed 8% of general fund revenues to be put into the Budget Stabilization Fund (BSA). It would also require that from the 2015-2016 fiscal year to the 2029-2030 fiscal year 50% of revenues that previously would have been deposited into the BSA to be put towards fiscal obligations that already existed. It also would create the Public School System Stabilization Account (PSSSA). It passed in the November 2014 California elections. It was supported by Kristin Olsen, Bob Huff, Jeff Gorell, Jim Nielsen, the California Democratic Party, the California Republican Party, the League of Women Voters of California, Western Growers Association and the Rural County Representatives of California. It was opposed by CREDO Action, Potrero Hill Democratic Club, the Green Party, the Libertarian Party and the Peace and Freedom Party.

Proposition 1, also known as Prop 1 and Water Bond, was a California ballot proposition intended to provide $7.12 billion in bonds for infrastructure projects relating to water supply and would allocate bond revenue. It was on the ballot as a bond issue. The proposition included some specific projects to be completed if passed, including allocating $810 million for regional water management plans and $395 million for statewide flood control related projects. It passed in the November 2014 California elections. It was supported by Governor Jerry Brown, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Barbara Boxer, the California Democratic Party, the California Republican Party, the California Farm Bureau Federation and the Fresno Irrigation District. Opponents of the proposition included Wesley Chesbro, Tim Donnelly and CREDO Action.

References

[2] [3] [1] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "California Proposition 45, Required Public Notice for Health Insurance Rate Changes Initiative (2014)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2023-05-26.
  2. 1 2 Lovett, Ian (2014-10-29). "California's Proposition 45 Would Offer Public a Say on Health Insurance Rates". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-05-26.
  3. 1 2 "Groups working to expand California's Proposition 103". 2011-12-19. Archived from the original on 2011-12-19. Retrieved 2023-05-26.
  4. 1 2 Crowe, Deborah (May 18, 2012). "Signatures Submitted for Health Insurance Rate Initiative". Los Angeles Business Journal. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  5. 1 2 Lifsher, Marc (February 1, 2012). "Sen. Feinstein backs health insurance rate controls". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
  6. 1 2 "CREDO Action urges NO vote on Prop. 1, the California Water Bond". Indybay. Retrieved 2023-05-27.
  7. 1 2 Court, Jamie (January 16, 2014). "Dennis Quaid Calls On Californians To Support Pack Patient Safety Act". Consumer Watchdog. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
  8. 1 2 "State Republicans Vote To Back Two Measures On November Ballot, Oppose Two". SM Mirror. 2014-09-22. Retrieved 2023-05-27.