2024 California Proposition 6

Last updated
Proposition 6
Flag of California.svg
November 5, 2024 (2024-11-05)

Ban Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes4,474,81645.34%
Light brown x.svg No5,394,83854.66%

2024 California Proposition 6 results map by county.svg

Proposition 6, titled Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment, was a California ballot proposition and constitutional amendment that failed in the 2024 general election on November 5. [1] [2] [3] The proposition, if passed, would have repealed the line "Involuntary servitude is prohibited except to punish crime" from the California Constitution, replacing it with language saying that involuntary servitude is prohibited absolutely.

Contents

Support

Supporters argued that "Proposition 6 ends slavery in California and upholds human rights and dignity for everyone. It replaces carceral involuntary servitude with voluntary work programs, has bipartisan support, and aligns with national efforts to reform the 13th Amendment. It will prioritize rehabilitation, lower recidivism, and improve public safety, resulting in taxpayer savings."

"Yes on Prop. 6" has raised $2.07 million as of October 30, 2024. [4]

Supporters

Opposition

No official argument against Proposition 6 was submitted to the California Secretary of State and no opponents were listed on the ballot. [5] However, public polling has shown the oppose side leading. [9]

The oppose side has not established an official campaign and raised $0 as of October 30, 2024. [4]

Opponents

Polling

Date of opinion pollConducted by Sample size In favorAgainstUndecidedMarginMargin of Error
October 7–15, 2024 [13] Public Policy Institute of California 1,137
LV
41%56%4%15% Against±3.1%
August 29 – September 11, 2024 [14] Public Policy Institute of California 1,071
LV
46%51%3%5% Against±3.7%

Results

The proposition failed with 4,474,816 (45.3 percent) "yes" votes and 5,394,838 (54.7%) "no" votes. [2] [3]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1865 Reconstruction amendment

The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. The amendment was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, by the House of Representatives on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the required 27 of the then 36 states on December 6, 1865, and proclaimed on December 18. It was the first of the three Reconstruction Amendments adopted following the American Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Involuntary servitude</span> Legal term which may constitute slavery

Involuntary servitude or involuntary slavery is a legal and constitutional term for a person laboring against that person's will to benefit another, under some form of coercion, to which it may constitute slavery. While laboring to benefit another occurs also in the condition of slavery, involuntary servitude does not necessarily connote the complete lack of freedom experienced in chattel slavery; involuntary servitude may also refer to other forms of unfree labor. Involuntary servitude is not dependent upon compensation or its amount. Prison labor is often referred to as involuntary servitude. Prisoners are forced to work for free or for very little money while they carry out their time in the system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 19</span> Failed measure to legalize marijuana

California Proposition 19 was a ballot initiative on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot. It was defeated, with 53.5% of California voters voting "No" and 46.5% voting "Yes." If passed, it would have legalized various marijuana-related activities, allowed local governments to regulate these activities, permitted local governments to impose and collect marijuana-related fees and taxes, and authorized various criminal and civil penalties. In March 2010, it qualified to be on the November statewide ballot. The proposition required a simple majority in order to pass, and would have taken effect the day after the election. Yes on 19 was the official advocacy group for the initiative and California Public Safety Institute: No On Proposition 19 was the official opposition group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 California Proposition 39</span> Referendum modifying corporate tax burdens

Proposition 39 is a ballot initiative in the state of California that modifies the way out-of-state corporations calculate their income tax burdens. The proposition was approved by voters in the November 6 general election, with 61.1% voting in favor of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 California Proposition 47</span> Reduction of some crimes to misdemeanours

Proposition 47, also known by its ballot title Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties. Initiative Statute, was a referendum passed by voters in the state of California on November 4, 2014. The measure was also referred to by its supporters as the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act. It recategorized some nonviolent offenses as misdemeanors, rather than felonies, as they had previously been categorized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 55</span>

Proposition 55 is a California ballot proposition that passed on the November 8, 2016 ballot, regarding extending by twelve years the temporary personal income tax increases enacted in 2012 on earnings over $250,000, with revenues allocated to K–12 schools, California Community Colleges, and, in certain years, healthcare. Proposition 55 will raise tax revenue by between $4 billion and $9 billion a year. Half of funds will go to schools and community colleges, up to $2 billion a year would go to Medi-Cal, and up to $1.5 billion will be saved and applied to debt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 60</span>

Proposition 60 was a California ballot proposition on the November 8, 2016, ballot which would have allowed the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) to prosecute an enforcement action anytime a condom is not visible in a pornographic film. The proposition failed to pass. Proposition 60 would have allowed any California resident to sue a pornographer and obtain their personal information. Frivolous lawsuits and actor safety were a major concern, as well as millions of taxpayer dollars it would cost to enforce. Enforcement of Proposition 60 was predicted to cost more than $1 million annually. State and local governments were predicted to lose tens of millions of dollars in tax revenue per year if the industry left the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Colorado Amendment A</span>

Colorado Amendment A was a 2018 referendum to amend Article II, Section 26 of the Constitution of Colorado to remove language permitting slavery and involuntary servitude only as punishment for crime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penal exception clause</span>

In the United States, the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime of which one has been convicted. In the latter 2010s, a movement has emerged to repeal the exception clause from both the federal and state constitutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 68</span>

California Proposition 68 was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that appeared on ballots in California in the June primary election in 2018. It was a $4.1bn bond measure to fund parks, environmental projects, water infrastructure projects and flood protection measures throughout California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 17</span> Restores right-to-vote after completion of prison term

The 2020 California Proposition 17 is a ballot measure that appeared on the ballot in the 2020 California elections on November 3. Prop 17 amended the Constitution of California to allow people who are on parole to vote. Due to the passage of this proposition, more than 50,000 people in California who are currently on parole and have completed their prison sentence are now eligible to vote and to run for public office. This proposition also provides that all those on parole in the future will be allowed to vote and run for public office as well. The work of Proposition 17 comes out of a history of addressing felony disenfranchisement in the United States. California voters approved this measured by a margin of roughly 18 percentage points.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 18</span> 2020 California ballot proposition

The 2020 California Proposition 18 would allow 17-year-olds to vote in primary and special elections if they will turn 18 by the subsequent general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 19</span> Successful property tax ballot initiative

California Proposition 19 (2020), also referred to as Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 11, is an amendment of the Constitution of California that was narrowly approved by voters in the general election on November 3, 2020, with just over 51% of the vote. The legislation increases the property tax burden on owners of inherited property to provide expanded property tax benefits to homeowners ages 55 years and older, disabled homeowners, and victims of natural disasters, and fund wildfire response. According to the California Legislative Analyst, Proposition 19 is a large net tax increase "of hundreds of millions of dollars per year."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 California elections</span>

The 2024 California elections took place on November 5, 2024. The statewide direct primary election was held on March 5, 2024.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 California Proposition 1</span> Successful referendum on enshrining reproductive rights in the state constitution

Proposition 1, titled Constitutional Right to Reproductive Freedom and initially known as Senate Constitutional Amendment 10 (SCA 10), was a California ballot proposition and state constitutional amendment that was voted on in the 2022 general election on November 8. Passing with more than two-thirds of the vote, the proposition amended the Constitution of California to explicitly grant the right to an abortion and contraceptives, making California among the first states in the nation to codify the right. The decision to propose the codification of abortion rights in the state constitution was precipitated in May 2022 by Politico's publishing of a leaked draft opinion showing the United States Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The decision reversed judicial precedent that previously held that the United States Constitution protected the right to an abortion.

The Tennessee Constitutional Amendment: 3, commonly known as Amendment 3 or the Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment, is an approved legislatively referred constitutional amendment to the Constitution of Tennessee that appeared on November 8, 2022. The proposed amendment modifies Article I, Section 33 of the Tennessee Constitution, removing the existing provision that allows slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for convicted individuals. Instead, the amendment explicitly states that slavery and involuntary servitude are prohibited while allowing inmates to work if they are duly convicted of a crime. The change seeks to clarify and restrict the use of involuntary labor within the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 California Proposition 1</span>

Proposition 1, titled Bonds for Mental Health Treatment Facilities, was a California ballot proposition and state bond measure that was voted on in the 2024 primary election on March 5. Passing with just 50.18 percent of the vote, the proposition will provide additional behavioral health services and issue up to $6.38 billion in bonds to fund housing for veterans and homeless individuals. It will also move about $140 million of annual existing tax revenue for mental health care and addiction care to the state from the counties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 California Proposition 2</span>

Proposition 2, titled Authorizing Bonds for Public Schools and Community College Facilities, was a California ballot proposition and legislative statutes that passed in the 2024 general election on November 5, 2024. The proposition authorized the issuance of $10 billion in state general obligation bonds for repair, upgrade, and construction of facilities at K–12 public schools and community colleges; this also includes charter schools throughout the state of California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 California Proposition 36</span>

Proposition 36, titled Allows Felony Charges and Increases Sentences for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes, was an initiated California ballot proposition and legislative statute that was approved in the 2024 general election. The proposition repealed parts of Proposition 47, passed during the 2014 general election, and amend the state constitution to increase penalties and allow felony charges for certain crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 California Proposition 32</span>

Proposition 32 is a California ballot proposition that was voted on as part of the 2024 California elections on November 5. It failed, with around 51.5% of voters voting "no". If it had passed, the proposition would have enacted the Living Wage Act of 2022 which would have increased the state's minimum wage to $18 per hour by 2025 and adjusted it every year to reduce the impact of inflation.

References

  1. "California Proposition 6, Remove Involuntary Servitude as Punishment for Crime Amendment (2024)". Ballotpedia . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  2. 1 2 Nanguneri, Shaanth (2024-08-14). "California Proposition 6: Limit forced labor". CalMatters. Retrieved 2024-11-08.
  3. 1 2 "State Ballot Measures - Statewide Results". California Secretary of State -- Unofficial results. 2024-11-08. Retrieved 2024-11-08.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Nanguneri, Shaanth. "Prop 6: Limit forced labor in state prisons". CalMatters. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 Zavala, Ashley (October 24, 2024). "Prop 6 explained: Prohibits California state prisons from forcing incarcerated people to work". KCRA . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  6. The Times Editorial Board (September 27, 2024). "Endorsement: Yes on Proposition 6. Forced labor undermines prisoner rehabilitation". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  7. The California McClatchy Editorial Board (September 23, 2024). "Bee endorsement: California voters could abolish the vestiges of slavery with Prop. 6". The Sacramento Bee . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  8. Chronicle Editorial Board (October 12, 2024). "Endorsement: Yes on Prop 6 to end a historic wrong and fight crime recidivism". San Francisco Chronicle . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  9. Garcia, Joe (October 17, 2024). "No one is fighting a proposition to ban forced labor in California prisons. Why it could still fail". CalMatters. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  10. Editorial Board (September 23, 2024). "Endorsement: No on Proposition 6. There's nothing wrong with requiring prisoners to work". The Orange County Register . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  11. U T Editorial Board (September 6, 2024). "Endorsement: No on flawed, poorly crafted Prop. 6". The San Diego Union-Tribune . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  12. Mercury News & East Bay Times Editorial Board (October 31, 2024). "Editorial: No, California inmates should not be entitled to refuse to do chores in prison". The Mercury News . Retrieved November 3, 2024.
  13. https://www.ppic.org/?show-pdf=true&docraptor=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ppic.org%2Fpublication%2Fppic-statewide-survey-californians-and-their-government-october-2024%2F
  14. https://www.ppic.org/?show-pdf=true&docraptor=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ppic.org%2Fpublication%2Fppic-statewide-survey-californians-and-their-government-september-2024%2F