2024 Colorado Proposition 131

Last updated
Proposition 131
Flag of Colorado.svg
November 5, 2024
Establishing All‑Candidate Primary and Ranked Choice Voting General Elections
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes1,385,06046.47%
Light brown x.svg No1,595,25653.53%
Total votes2,980,316100.00%
2024 Colorado Amendment 131 results map by county.svg

2024 Colorado Proposition 131 was a proposed ballot measure that appeared before voters in Colorado during the 2024 general election. The citizen initiated proposition would have replaced Colorado's partisan primaries with non-partisan blanket primaries and would have implemented ranked-choice (instant-runoff) voting for most statewide and state legislative general elections in which the top four candidates in the primary would have qualified for the general election ballot. [1]

Contents

Background

Currently, Colorado uses partisan primaries to select who appears on general election ballots and a first past the post voting system like most US states. Had Proposition 131 passed, Colorado would have switched to a system of blanket primaries and ranked choice general elections. Similar systems were adopted by Maine in 2016 and Alaska in 2020. The proposition was initiated by citizen petition, largely funded by health care executive Kent Thiry. Similar proposals were on the ballot in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon, funded by a network of donors of which Thiry is a part. [1]

In 2024, Governor Jared Polis signed into law Senate Bill 210 which heightened requirements for the adoption of ranked choice voting in Colorado. Specifically, the law requires that at least 12 communities of various required sizes adopt ranked choice voting at a local level before it can be implemented statewide. This made it unclear how quickly ranked choice voting would have been implemented in Colorado had Proposition 131 passed. However, Polis had committed to ensuring ranked choice voting was put into effect by the 2028 election if voters approved the proposition. In addition, Polis endorsed the measure. [2]

Contents

The proposition will appeared on the ballot as follows: [3]

Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes creating new election processes for certain federal and state offices, and, in connection therewith, creating a new all-candidate primary election for U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, governor, attorney general, secretary of state, treasurer, CU board of regents, state board of education, and the Colorado state legislature; allowing voters to vote for any one candidate per office, regardless of the voter’s or candidate’s political party affiliation; providing that the four candidates for each office who receive the most votes advance to the general election; and in the general election, allowing voters to rank candidates for each office on their ballot, adopting a process for how the ranked votes are tallied, and determining the winner to be the candidate with the highest number of votes in the final tally?

Campaigns

Support

The campaign in support of Proposition 131 was led by Colorado Voters First. Additionally, Colorado's official voter guide offered the arguments in support of Proposition 131 that a blanket primary system would create an equal opportunity for everyone to participate in primary elections, increase voter turnout in primaries, and make general elections more competitive. It also offered that ranking candidates in order of preference in general elections gives voters more choices, minimizes the spoiler effect, and results in outcomes that better reflect the will of the voters.

'Yes' [4]
Federal officials
State officials
State senators
State representatives
Local politicians
Newspapers
Organizations

Opposition

There were two main groups leading opposition against Proposition 131: Voters Rights Colorado and First Choice Counts. [5] Colorado's official voter guide also offered the arguments against Proposition 131 that the measure will make elections more expensive, confuse voters, and weaken faith in the outcomes of Colorado elections. Additionally, it offered that political parties should have separate primaries, with unaffiliated voters already being able to participate in Colorado's primary system, and a blanket primary system would result in more expensive primary campaigns. [6]

'No'
Federal officials
State senators
State representatives
Local officials
Organizations

Polling

Poll sourceDate(s)
administered		Sample
size [a] 		Margin
of error		ForAgainstUndecided
Keating Research August 28 – September 1, 2024400 (LV)± 3.5%56%21%23%

Results

Proposition 131 required a simple majority to pass. It failed, only receiving 46% of the vote. [12]

Proposition 131
ChoiceVotes %
Light brown x.svg No1,595,25653.53
Yes1,385,06046.47
Total votes2,980,316100.00

Results by county

CountyForAgainstMarginTotal votes cast
# %# %# %
Adams 107,63750.28%106,45449.72%1,1830.55%214,091
Alamosa 3,13044.67%3,87755.33%-747-10.66%7,007
Arapahoe 144,97447.83%158,10052.17%-13,126-4.33%303,074
Archuleta 3,80943.76%4,89556.24%-1,086-12.48%8,704
Baca 52627.93%1,35772.07%-831-44.13%1,883
Bent 83740.03%1,25459.97%-417-19.94%2,091
Boulder 87,42548.02%94,62651.98%-7,201-3.96%182,051
Broomfield 20,98548.21%22,54151.79%-1,556-3.57%43,526
Chaffee 6,30846.46%7,26853.54%-960-7.07%13,576
Cheyenne 25124.80%76175.20%-510-50.40%1,012
Clear Creek 2,77349.19%2,86450.81%-91-1.61%5,637
Conejos 1,42336.64%2,46163.36%-1,038-26.73%3,884
Costilla 90847.74%99452.26%-86-4.52%1,902
Crowley 60936.95%1,03963.05%-430-26.09%1,648
Custer 1,30435.39%2,38164.61%-1,077-29.23%3,685
Delta 7,12838.19%11,53661.81%-4,408-23.62%18,664
Denver 180,06053.81%154,57846.19%25,4827.61%334,638
Dolores 44633.74%87666.26%-430-32.53%1,322
Douglas 92,66940.57%135,72159.43%-43,052-18.85%228,390
Eagle 12,54449.19%12,95850.81%-414-1.62%25,502
El Paso 163,03245.35%196,48454.65%-33,452-9.30%359,516
Elbert 6,70834.50%12,73865.50%-6,030-31.01%19,446
Fremont 10,10542.01%13,94957.99%-3,844-15.98%24,054
Garfield 12,38543.47%16,10356.53%-3,718-13.05%28,488
Gilpin 1,83146.67%2,09253.33%-261-6.65%3,923
Grand 4,19844.88%5,15555.12%-957-10.23%9,353
Gunnison 4,93948.82%5,17751.18%-238-2.35%10,116
Hinsdale 23440.84%33959.16%-105-18.32%573
Huerfano 1,83543.66%2,36856.34%-533-12.68%4,203
Jackson 28035.76%50364.24%-223-28.48%783
Jefferson 160,90747.17%180,18152.83%-19,274-5.65%341,088
Kiowa 20425.19%60674.81%-402-49.63%810
Kit Carson 1,05430.21%2,43569.79%-1,381-39.58%3,489
La Plata 15,39646.86%17,45753.14%-2,061-6.27%32,853
Lake 1,89952.49%1,71947.51%1804.98%3,618
Larimer 101,72448.40%108,43051.60%-6,706-3.19%210,154
Las Animas 3,25944.32%4,09455.68%-835-11.36%7,353
Lincoln 79231.95%1,68768.05%-895-36.10%2,479
Logan 3,27534.10%6,33065.90%-3,055-31.81%9,605
Mesa 35,79041.77%49,88658.23%-14,096-16.45%85,676
Mineral 31143.50%40456.50%-93-13.01%715
Moffat 2,14534.73%4,03165.27%-1,886-30.54%6,176
Montezuma 5,46338.67%8,66661.33%-3,203-22.67%14,129
Montrose 8,31034.57%15,72565.43%-7,415-30.85%24,035
Morgan 4,81937.71%7,95962.29%-3,140-24.57%12,778
Otero 3,34239.06%5,21460.94%-1,872-21.88%8,556
Ouray 1,71444.24%2,16055.76%-446-11.51%3,874
Park 4,85942.15%6,66857.85%-1,809-15.69%11,527
Phillips 66930.83%1,50169.17%-832-38.34%2,170
Pitkin 4,47544.87%5,49955.13%-1,024-10.27%9,974
Prowers 1,63033.52%3,23366.48%-1,603-32.96%4,863
Pueblo 35,96744.38%45,07455.62%-9,107-11.24%81,041
Rio Blanco 1,08731.16%2,40168.84%-1,314-37.67%3,488
Rio Grande 2,48341.80%3,45758.20%-974-16.40%5,940
Routt 7,45649.24%7,68750.76%-231-1.53%15,143
Saguache 1,48746.98%1,67853.02%-191-6.03%3,165
San Juan 27051.43%25548.57%152.86%525
San Miguel 2,20151.40%2,08148.60%1202.80%4,282
Sedgwick 41933.57%82966.43%-410-32.85%1,248
Summit 8,27551.70%7,73248.30%5433.39%16,007
Teller 5,86337.85%9,62862.15%-3,765-24.30%15,491
Washington 75228.03%1,93171.97%-1,179-43.94%2,683
Weld 74,11944.07%94,08455.93%-19,965-11.87%168,203
Yuma 1,35130.46%3,08569.54%-1,734-39.09%4,436
Total1,385,06046.47%1,595,25653.53%-210,196-7.05%2,980,316

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear

References

  1. 1 2 Kenney, Andrew (August 29, 2024). "Colorado to vote on ranked-choice voting, eliminating partisan primaries". Colorado Public Radio . Retrieved September 19, 2024.
  2. ↑ Paul, Jesse (September 20, 2024). "Colorado's all-candidate primary and ranked choice general election ballot measure is poised to pass, poll shows". Colorado Sun . Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  3. ↑ "2024 State Ballot Information Booklet" (PDF). Colorado General Assembly . September 11, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024.
  4. ↑ "Endorsements". Yes On Prop 131. Retrieved October 3, 2024.
  5. ↑ Jena Griswold. "Amendments and Propositions on the 2024 Ballot". Colorado Secretary of State . Retrieved September 18, 2024.
  6. ↑ Zelinger, Marshall (September 24, 2024). "What does Proposition 131 mean for Colorado?". KUSA . Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  7. ↑ Klamann, Seth (October 14, 2024). "Proposition 131 would change Colorado's election system in races for governor, Congress, other offices". The Denver Post . Retrieved October 15, 2024.
  8. ↑ Venegas, Natalie (20 November 2023). "Lauren Boebert Rages Against Plan That Could Keep Republicans Off Ballots". Newsweek . Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Paul, Jesse; Eason, Brian (4 October 2024). "An Alaska lawmaker's experience with an all-candidate primary, ranked choice general election" . The Colorado Sun. Archived from the original on 7 October 2024. Retrieved 7 October 2024.
  10. ↑ "November 2024 Ballot Initiatives and Referred Measures". Colorado Democratic Party . Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  11. ↑ "2024 COLORADO BALLOT QUESTIONS". Colorado Republican Party . Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  12. ↑ "Results". Colorado Secretary of State . Retrieved December 3, 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.