Ranked-choice voting in the United States

Last updated

Ranked-choice voting in the US by state .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Some state-wide elections Local option for municipalities to opt-in Local elections in some jurisdictions RCV banned state-wide Ranked choice voting by US state 20240623.svg
Ranked-choice voting in the US by state
  Some state-wide elections
  Local option for municipalities to opt-in
  Local elections in some jurisdictions
  RCV banned state-wide

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) can refer to one of several ranked voting methods used in some cities and states in the United States. The term is not strictly defined, but most often refers to instant-runoff voting (IRV) or single transferable vote (STV), the main difference being whether only one winner or multiple winners are elected.

Contents

At the federal and state level, instant runoff voting is used for congressional and presidential elections in Maine; state, congressional, and presidential general elections in Alaska; and special congressional elections in Hawaii. Starting in 2025, it will also be used for all elections in the District of Columbia.

As of February 2024, RCV is used for local elections in 45 US cities including Salt Lake City and Seattle. [2] It has also been used by some state political parties in party-run primaries and nominating conventions. [3] [4] [5] As a contingency in the case of a runoff election, ranked ballots are used by overseas voters in six states. [2]

Since 2020, voters in seven states have rejected ballot initiatives that would have implemented, or allowed legislatures to implement, ranked choice voting. Ranked choice voting has also been banned in eleven states.

History

Most elections in the United States use the first past the post system, often with primary elections. RCV is not the only other family of systems used though, Nanson's method and Bucklin voting have also been used.

Between 1912 and 1930, supplementary voting, typically with only two rankings and only two rounds of voting, were implemented but later repealed. [6] Proportional representation by means of the single-transferable vote (PR-STV) was used in about 40 U.S. and Canadian cities prior to 1930. PR-STV was first used in North America in Ashtabula, Ohio, in 1915. PR-STV was also used for the election of the nine-member city council of Cincinnati, Ohio, from 1924 to 1957, and was also used in Cleveland, Ohio and Sacramento, California. New York City adopted STV in 1936 as a method for breaking the corrupt political machine of Tammany Hall dominating the city and used it for five elections from 1937 to 1945. [7] Cambridge, MA started using proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote in 1941 for its city council and school committee elections.

Starting in the early 2000s, instant-runoff voting spread in the San Francisco Bay Area and throughout Minnesota. [8] The city of Minneapolis, MN also adopted the usage of PR-STV for its Board of Estimate and Taxation and a combination of instant run off voting for district elections and PR-STV for at-large elections of its Park and Recreation Board. [9]

Instant runoff voting was also adopted in the cities of Aspen and Burlington during the early 2000s, though they were later repealed within a decade of their adoption. [10] [11] Burlington would later re-adopt instant runoff voting in 2021.

Both Portland, Maine and Portland, Oregon adopted STV around 2022, though Portland, Oregon's implementation only applied to its new city council system, whereas Portland, Maine's implementation applies to all of the city's multi-seat bodies.

The proposed Fair Representation Act would require multi-member districts for elections to the US House of Representatives which would then be elected by STV. States with only one representative would instead have elections by instant runoff voting. [12] [13]

Use at state and federal levels

Maine, 2018–present

State and congressional elections

In 2018, Maine began using instant runoff voting for primary and general elections for the U.S. Senate and House, and for primary elections for governor and the state legislature. Maine was the first state to use instant runoff voting for all these elections.

In 2016, Maine voters approved Maine Question 5 with 52% of the vote, approving instant runoff voting for primary and general elections for governor, U.S. Senate, U.S. House and the state legislature, starting in 2018. [14] However, in May 2017, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court stated that instant runoff voting can be used only for federal offices and primary elections for state offices because the state constitution specifies that a plurality suffices to win general elections for state offices. [15]

In October 2017, the state legislature voted to delay implementation of Question 5 until 2021, at which time the entire Question would be considered repealed unless a constitutional amendment had been passed permitting instant runoff voting for general elections for state offices. [16] Maine voters then collected enough signatures to put a Question on the June 2018 ballot to veto the October 2017 law. The people's veto, Question 1, passed in the June 2018 election. This election also initiated the use of instant runoff voting for state and federal primaries because the presence of Question 1 on the ballot suspended the October 2017 law. [17]

In the 2018 United States House of Representatives elections in Maine, though Republican incumbent Bruce Poliquin led by 2,171 votes in the first round of vote tabulation in the 2nd Congressional District, he did not have a majority of the votes, initiating the instant runoff tabulation process. Poliquin filed a lawsuit in federal court on November 13, seeking an order to halt the second-round tabulation of ballots and declare RCV unconstitutional, but his request for an injunction to halt the counting was denied. [18] [19] On November 15, the Maine Secretary of State announced Democratic candidate Jared Golden as the winner by 3,509 votes, after votes for independent candidates Tiffany Bond and Will Hoar were eliminated and ballots with these votes had their second- or third-choice votes counted. [20]

Poliquin requested a recount of the ballots just before the deadline of November 26. [21] On December 14, with almost half of the votes recounted and with the result not being significantly changed, Poliquin ended the recount after incurring $15,000 in fees. [22] [23]

Poliquin also continued his lawsuit [24] and asked the judge, Lance Walker, to order a new election be held should he decline to hold instant runoff unconstitutional. [25] Judge Walker ruled against Poliquin on December 13, rejecting all of his arguments. [26] Poliquin appealed to the Court of Appeals in Boston and requested an order to prevent Golden from being certified as the winner, but that request was also rejected. [23] On December 24, Poliquin dropped his lawsuit, allowing Golden to take the seat. [27] [28] [29] [30]

Instant runoff voting was retained for the 2020 U.S. Senate and U.S. House elections.

Presidential elections

On August 26, 2019, the Maine Legislature passed a bill adopting instant runoff voting for both presidential primaries and the general election. [31] [32] On September 6, 2019, Governor Janet Mills allowed the bill to become law without her signature, which delayed it from taking effect until after the 2020 presidential primaries in March. It was used in the general election, making Maine the first state to use instant runoff for a presidential general election. [33]

In June 2020, the Maine Republican Party filed signatures for a veto referendum to ask voters if they want the law repealed and preclude the use of instant runoff for the 2020 election. Matthew Dunlap, Maine's secretary of state, rejected a number of signatures that had not been collected by a registered voter as required under the state constitution, resulting in there being insufficient signatures for the veto referendum to qualify for the ballot. A challenge to Dunlap's decision in Maine Superior Court was successful for the Maine Republican Party, but the case was appealed to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. [34] [35] [36] On September 8, the court issued a stay of the Superior Court ruling pending appeal on the merits, causing confusion and uncertainty regarding the 2020 election. [37] Nevertheless, ballots began being printed later that day without the veto referendum and including instant runoff for the presidential election. [38] [39] The court ruled in favor of the secretary of state on September 22, allowing instant runoff to be used. [40] An emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court claiming a First Amendment violation was denied by Justice Stephen Breyer (the circuit justice for the First Circuit) on October 6. [41]

It was predicted that implementation of instant runoff could potentially delay the projection of the winner(s) of Maine's electoral votes for days after election day, [42] and could also complicate interpretation of the national popular vote. [43] However, the 2020 United States presidential election in Maine was won statewide and in the 1st congressional district by Joe Biden and in the 2nd congressional district by Donald Trump with majorities, so instant runoff vote transfers did not need to be conducted, and did not impact the determination of the winners or the national popular vote tally.

Alaska, 2022–present

In the 2020 Alaska elections, voters approved Measure 2, which replaced party primaries with a single nonpartisan blanket primary, in which the top 4 candidates advance to a general election that uses instant runoff voting. This system is now used for all state, federal, and presidential elections (except presidential primaries, which continue to be partisan). [44] The first election using the system was held on August 16, 2022, and elected Democrat Mary Peltola to Congress over Republican former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin [45] and Republican Nick Begich.

In 2024, Alaskans voted on a measure to repeal the system and return to partisan primaries. [46]

Hawaii, 2023–present

On June 17th, 2022, Hawaii Governor David Ige signed Senate Bill 2162 into law allowing for the use of instant runoff voting for the special elections of federal and county council offices. [47] [48] Special elections in Hawaii have candidates of all parties appear on the same ballot. Before the change to instant runoff voting, the winner was whoever received a plurality of votes, unique among states. [49] The bill's author, State Senator Karl Rhoads, expressed support for the usage of instant runoff voting in special elections stating: "You often get a long list of people who are running and what it results in if it’s just the plurality winner, you can get a winner with 10% of the vote, and that doesn’t really truly reflect the will of the people [in] that district". [50]

District of Columbia, 2026–present

In November 2024, the District of Columbia voted for Initiative 83 or the Make All Votes Count Act of 2024, which will allow registered independents to participate in party primaries and implement ranked choice voting in all presidential, federal, and district elections. [51] [52]

Use at local levels

According to Deb Otis, director of research and policy at FairVote, the use of instant runoff voting by one or two cities can lead to other cities in the region adopting the system. Examples of this include the San Francisco Bay Area and Minnesota. [8]

California

California
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Berkeley [53] Mayor, auditor, and city councilMarch 2, 200472%November 2, 2010 [54] [55]
Oakland [56] Mayor, city council, city attorney, city auditor, and school directors [57] November 7, 200667%November 2, 2010 [54] [55]
Ojai [58] City council [59] November 8, 202256% [60] November 5, 2024 (Planned)
San Francisco [61] All city officialsMarch 5. 200255%October 2004 [62]
San Leandro Mayor and city councilNovember 7, 2000
January 19, 2010		63% [63]
5-2 [64] 		November 2, 2010
Palm Desert [65] City councilMay 14, 2020 [66] 5-0November 8, 2022 [67]
Eureka [68] Mayor and city councilNovember 3, 202063%November 5, 2024 (Planned) [69]

Colorado

Colorado
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Basalt Mayor2002 [70] —2004 [71]
Boulder [72] MayorNovember 3, 202078%November 7, 2023 [73]
Broomfield [74] Mayor and city councilNovember 2, 202152%November 7 2023
Carbondale [75] —April 29, 200380%Yet to implement [76]
Fort Collins [77] All city officialsNovember 8, 202258%2025 [78]

Illinois

Illinois
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Evanston Mayor, city council and city clerkNovember 8, 2022 [79] 82%April 1, 2025 (Planned)

Maine

Maine
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Portland MayorNovember 2, 2010 [80] 52%November 8, 2011 [81]
All other city officials [82] March 3, 2020—
Westbrook [83] All city electionsNovember 2, 202163%—

Maryland

Maryland
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Takoma Park [84] Mayor and city councilNovember 8, 200584%January 30, 2007

Massachusetts

Massachusetts
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Easthampton [85] Mayor and city councilNovember 5, 201955%November 2, 2021 [86] [ better source needed ]
Amherst Town Council, school committee, library trustees (using multi-member districts) [87] [88] 2018tbd* [89]

*Requires state approval


Michigan

Michigan
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Ann Arbor [90] All city officials2021tbd*
East Lansing [91] Mayor, City Commissioners [92] 202352.5%tbd*
Ferndale 200468% [93] tbd*
Kalamazoo [94] Mayor, City Commissioners [95] 202371%tbd*
Royal Oak [96] Mayor, City Commissioners [97] 202350.5%tbd*

*Would require state approval to be implemented


Minnesota

Minnesota
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Minneapolis All city officialsNovember 7, 200665% [98] November 3, 2009 [99]
St. Louis Park [100] Mayor and city councilApril 2018—November 5 2019
Saint Paul [101] Mayor and city councilNovember 4, 200952%November 2011 [102]
Minnetonka [103] Mayor and city councilNovember 3, 202055%November 2021
Bloomington, Minnesota [68] Mayor and city councilNovember 3, 202051% [104] November 2, 2021 [105]

New Mexico

New Mexico
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Santa Fe [106] Mayor and city councilMarch 4, 200865%March 6, 2018 [107]
Las Cruces [108] Mayor and city councilJune 20186-0November 5, 2019

New York

New York
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
New York City [109] [110] Mayor, public advocate, comptroller, borough president, and city councilNovember 5, 201973%February 2, 2021 [111]
A ranked choice ballot for Portland, Oregon's 2024 election PortlandBallot.2024.Council.jpg
A ranked choice ballot for Portland, Oregon's 2024 election

Oregon

Oregon
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Benton County [112] All county officialsNovember 8, 201654%November 3, 2020 [113]
Corvallis All city officials [114] January 19, 20229-0 [115] November 8, 2022 [116]
Multnomah County [117] All county officialsNovember 8, 202267%2026
Portland [118] [119] Mayor and auditorNovember 8, 2022—November 5, 2024

Utah

In 2018, Utah passed a law allowing municipalities to opt in to a temporary instant runoff trial, the Municipal Alternative Voting Methods Pilot Project, starting with the 2019 municipal elections and ending with the 2025 elections. [120] [121]

Utah
MunicipalityOffice(s)Participation Years
Vineyard [122] [123] —2019-2023
Payson [122] [123] —2019-2023
Salt Lake City [122] [123] —2021-2023
Springville [124] —2021
Draper [122] —2021
Lehi [122] [123] —2021-2023
Riverton [122] —2021
Goshen [122] —2021
Newton [122] Town council [125] 2021
Woodland Hills [122] [123] —2021-2023
Heber City [122] [123] Mayor and city council [126] 2021-2023
Moab [127] Mayor and city council [128] 2021
Genola [123] [124] —2021-2023
Sandy [124] —2021
South Salt Lake [123] —2021-2023
Magna [123] —2021-2023
Bluffdale —2021
Nibley Mayor and city council [129] [130] 2021
Millcreek [123] —2021-2023
River Heights City council [131] 2021
Cottonwood Heights —2021
Midvale [123] —2021-2023
Kearns [123] —2023

Vermont

Vermont
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Burlington City Council [132] [133] March 2, 202164%2022 [134]
Mayor, city councilors, school commissioners, ward Clerks, and inspectors of election [135] March 202364%2024 [136]

Virginia

The Virginia legislature passed a bill in 2020 providing a local option for municipalities to use the single transferable vote through 2031. [137]

Virginia
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Arlington County [138] County BoardDecember 2022—June 20, 2023

Washington

Seattle's adoption of RCV is notable in two distinct ways. The voters were first asked if they wanted to change the voting system at all, and then were asked to choose between RCV and approval voting. [139] Additionally, RCV will be used for the primary, while use in the general is more typical. [140]

Washington
MunicipalityOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Seattle [140] All city primariesNovember 7, 202251%August 3, 2027 (Planned)

Use in party-run primaries, caucuses, and conventions

Democratic presidential primaries, 2020

Five states used RCV in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, some in response to COVID-19 making an in-person caucus too risky. [141] [142] Alaska, Hawaii, Kansas, and Wyoming used it for all voters and Nevada used it for absentee caucus voters. [143] Rather than eliminating candidates until a single winner is chosen, voters' choices were reallocated until all remaining candidates had at least 15%, the threshold to receive delegates to the convention. [144] While all candidates but one had dropped out by the time of the four primaries, use of RCV ensured that voters who selected non-competing candidates as their first choice would not have their votes wasted, but rather used toward determining delegate allocation among the remaining candidates. [145] [146]

Utah Republican Party

After voting to authorize its use, the Utah Republican Party used RCV in 2002, 2003 and 2004 at its statewide convention, [147] including in a contested race to nominate a governor in 2004. [148] In 2005, Republicans used repeated balloting for its statewide convention and has done so in subsequent years. Some county Republican parties like Cache County continue to use instant runoff voting at their conventions. [149]

Democratic Party of Virginia

RCV was used in 2014 by leaders of the Henrico County Democrats in a three-candidate special election nomination contest for the House of Delegates in December 2014. [150]

Republican Party of Virginia

In 2021, the Republican Party of Virginia nominated candidates for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general in a party convention that used ranked-choice voting. [3]

Indiana Republican Party

In 2020, the Indiana Republican Party used ranked choice voting to nominate its candidate for attorney general. [151]

Absentee use

Several states jurisdictions that hold runoff elections allow certain categories of absentee voters to submit ranked-choice ballots, because the interval between votes is too short for a second round of absentee voting. Ranked-choice ballots enable long-distance absentee votes to count in the runoff election if their first choice does not make the runoff. Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana, [152] Georgia, and South Carolina all use ranked-choice ballots for overseas and military voters in federal elections that might go to a runoff. [153] [154] Springfield, Illinois follows the same practice for city elections after voters approved it with 91% support. [155]

Single transferable vote

Some jurisdictions have adopted the single transferable vote, which is a proportional for multi-winner elections, but is identical to instant runoff in single-winner elections.

Local Governments using single transferable vote
Local GovernmentOffice(s)Date PassedMargin PassedFirst Use Date
Arden, Delaware Board of Assessors [156] 1912 [157] ——
Cambridge, Massachusetts [120] City council and school committee——1941
Minneapolis, Minnesota Park Board [99] November 7th, 200665% [98] November 3, 2009
Eastpointe, Michigan [158] [159] City CouncilJune 5, 2019—2019
Albany, California City Council and School Board [57] November 3rd, 202073% [160] November 8th, 2022 [67]
Portland, Maine [161] All multi-seat offices [162] November 8th, 202263%—
Portland, Oregon [118] [119] City commissionerNovember 8, 202258%November 4th, 2024
Arlington County [138] County BoardDecember 2022—June 20, 2023
Easthampton, Massachusetts [163] [164] City council and school committeeNovember 7th, 202362%2025

Virginia

The Virginia legislature passed a bill in 2020 allowing for local governing bodies to adopt the single transferable vote through 2031. [137]

Michigan

Eastpointe

Entered a consent decree with the US Department of Justice to implement RCV for city council elections for at least four years starting in 2019 to address claims of racial discrimination. Multi-winner RCV in the form of the single transferable vote would have been used, with two city council members elected at each staggered election. [165] [166]

Stalled implementations

Texas

Austin

In 2021, Austin voters approved a ballot measure 59–41% to adopt ranked-choice voting for city elections, replacing the two-round system. [167] However, it is not clear if the reference to "majority" in state law allows its use. [168] [169]

Michigan

The implementation of all ranked choice voting methods in the state of Michigan has yet to actually happen as local governments still require the approval of Michigan's state legislature in order to do so. As a result, those cities that have already passed measures adopting ranked choice voting still continue to use their previous method for elections. [170] [ needs update ]

Massachusetts

Amherst

Despite passing ranked choice voting in 2018, Amherst has not yet received approval from Massachusetts' state legislature, and therefore were unable to implement the reform. [89]

Bans on use

As of November 2024, ranked choice voting is banned in eleven states. [171]

On February 28th, 2022, Tennessee became the first state to ban ranked choice voting state-wide. The sponsor of the bill, then Republican State Senator Brian Kelsey, said the ban was "a win for protecting election integrity and ensuring voter clarity at the ballot box." [172] Florida quickly followed with a similar ban, when governor Ron DeSantis signed senate bill 524 into law on April 25th. [173] In spring of the following year, there was another string of bans in red states, with Idaho passing a ban on March 23rd, [174] South Dakota on March 21st, [175] and Montana on April 26th, 2023. [176] Between April and June of 2024, the use of RCV was banned statewide in Kentucky, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. [177] In 2024, Missouri voters approved a ballot initiative that banned ranked choice voting. [178]

Repeals

Between 1912 and 1930, limited forms of ranked-choice voting were implemented and subsequently repealed in Florida, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.[ citation needed ] In the 1970s, it was implemented in Ann Arbor, Michigan, but quickly repealed after only a single election. [179] More recently, it was adopted and repealed in Pierce County, Washington (2006–2009); [180] Burlington, Vermont (2005–2010); [11] and Aspen, Colorado (2007–2010). [10] It has since been reinstated in Burlington, [181] and Ann Arbor residents voted to reinstate it as well, with that use likely needing approval from Michigan’s state legislature. [182]

Aspen (2007–2010)

Aspen, Colorado [70] passed ranked-choice voting in November 2007 [183] for the mayoral race and for at-large council races with two winners. In March 2009, the Aspen council adopted a unique variation of RCV for the council races. [184] A block voting tally based on the first and second rank choices was used to determine first round support. Any candidate with initial majority support was elected. If there were not two first-round winners, there was a batch elimination of low-placing candidates to reduce the number of continuing candidates before the instant runoff. In the latter case, separate rounds of ranked-choice counting would be conducted for each council seat, with the winner of the first seat eliminated from the race for the second seat.

Aspen's first elections with RCV and the new city council system were on May 5, 2009. The number of voters was the highest in the history of Aspen elections. [185] Mick Ireland was re-elected as mayor in the fourth round of a four-candidate race. Both city council incumbents were defeated in the two-seat RCV election in which nine candidates participated. The winners were selected after RCV tallies. 168 spoiled ballots were recast by voters alerted to errors by their optical scanning machine. [186] The city reported 0% invalid ballots in the mayor's race and 0.9% invalid ballots in the two-seat city council elections. [187]

The elections were close, and some Aspen observers argued that a traditional runoff system would have given more time to consider their top choices. There also was debate over how to implement audit procedures. [188] In 2009, voters rejected an advisory measure to maintain IRV [189] and in 2010, approved a binding amendment to return to a traditional runoff system. [190] [191]

Telluride (2011-2019)

On November 4, 2008, voters in the town of Telluride, Colorado, passed an ordinance with 67% of the vote to adopt RCV for the next three mayoral elections, starting in November 2011 [70] if three candidates file for the office. [192] The system was used for the city's 2011 mayoral election. The incumbent mayor Stu Fraser was re-elected by securing a majority of first choices. [193] In the 2015 mayoral election, Sean Murphy handily won an open seat election for mayor after trailing in first choices. [194]

Per the initial ballot measure, RCV could have continued after three elections with approval from the Town Council. That action was not taken so in 2023, the city returned to first-past-the-post voting. [195]

Ann Arbor (1974–1976)

Ranked-choice voting (then called preferential voting) was adopted for mayoral races in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 1974 after a successful ballot initiative sponsored by the local Human Rights Party. RCV was used in the 1975 mayoral election. Democratic Party nominee Albert H. Wheeler, the city's first African-American mayor, won after trailing the Republican incumbent 49% to 40% in the first round of counting, with remaining votes cast for the Human Rights Party nominee. [196] The ousted incumbent Stephenson alleged in a lawsuit that RCV violated the equal protection clause, but the county circuit court upheld the voting system. [197]

In April 1976, 62% of voters voted to repeal RCV. [179]

North Carolina

A 2006 law established that ranked-choice voting would be used when judicial vacancies were created between a primary election and sixty days before a general election. The law also established a pilot program for RCV for up to 10 cities in 2007 and up to 10 counties for 2008; to be monitored and reported to the 2007–2008 General Assembly. [198] In November 2010, North Carolina had three RCV elections for local-level superior court judges, each with three candidates, and a statewide IRV election for a North Carolina Court of Appeals seat (with 13 candidates). The Court of Appeals race is believed to be the first time RCV has been used in any statewide general election in the United States. [199] [200]

Several municipalities considered participating in the RCV pilot in 2007. Cary, Hendersonville and Kinston voted to participate; Kinston dropped out because there were not enough candidates running to use RCV. Other cities declined to participate in the pilot. No North Carolina counties volunteered to participate in RCV in the 2008 elections held in conjunction with state and federal races. [201] In August 2008 the governor signed legislation extending the pilot program for local elections to be held in 2009–2011. [202]

There was much debate whether RCV was successful when it was used. [203] [204] [205] This debate continued in the North Carolina legislature when it debated legislation to extend the pilot program. [206] Some "verified voting" advocates contended that the RCV tabulation procedures used were not legal. [207] [208] [209] Both advocates and opponents of the provision supported amendments to the pilot program to ensure that the local governing body of any jurisdiction participating in the pilot must approve their participation; the jurisdiction must develop and implement voter education plans; and the University of North Carolina School of Government must approve procedures for conducting RCV elections by January 2009. After these amendments were adopted, the state House of Representatives, by a majority of 65-47, rejected an amendment designed to remove the pilot program from the legislation, and the legislation ultimately won approval by both houses. [210]

In 2009, Hendersonville again used RCV. [211] Three candidates ran for mayor in Hendersonville in November 2009; five candidates ran for two seats on the city council using a multi-seat version of RCV. [212] All seats were filled based on first choices without the need for further counting. [213]

In 2011, Hendersonville's city council unanimously voted to use RCV a third time, although ultimately not enough candidates filed for office to trigger the need for the system. [214]

The RCV pilot program was repealed by the General Assembly in 2013, meaning special judicial elections with more than two candidates would once again be decided by simple plurality. [215] [216]

Cary (2007)

In October 2007, the city of Cary, North Carolina used RCV for municipal election for three council seats and for mayor. [217] The mayor's race (with two candidates) and two of the council seats (with four and three candidates on the ballot) were won with a majority in the first round. The remaining council seat, with three candidates, went to a second round of counting; the plurality winner in the first round went on to win with 50.9% of the final round vote, amounting to 46.4% of first-round ballots cast, with 8.9% of the ballots offering no preference between the top two candidates. [218]

COUNCIL MEMBER C-B 1
CARY MUNICIPAL DISTRICT B:
CandidateRound 1Round 2
Don Frantz1151(38.1%)1401(46.4%)
Vickie Maxwell1075(35.6%)1353(44.8%)
Nels Roseland793(26.2%)--
Other3(0.0%)--
Exhausted ballots--268(8.9%)
Total3022(100%)3022(100%)

Cary used hand or machine-marked paper ballots that are read on optical scanners manufactured by ES&S. First column choices were tallied at the precinct. The second and third column choices were counted at a central location. In 2009, the Cary Town Council voted to use a traditional runoff method. [219]

Ohio

Ashtabula

After home rule was adopted, Ashtabula was the first American adoption of single transferable vote in 1915. [220] It was repealed in 1929. [220]

Cincinnati

Cincinnati adopted a single transferable vote charter in 1925 until it was repealed in 1957. [220]

Cleveland

In 1921, Cleveland amended its charter adopting proportional representation to elect city council. [220] :116 Single transferable vote with large multi member districts was used in 5 elections until repealed in 1931. [220]

Hamilton

Hamilton changed its charter to adopt single transferable vote in 1926 until its repeal in 1960. [220]

Toledo

Toledo adopted a single transferable vote charter in 1935 until its repeal in 1949. [220]

Burlington, VT

The city of Burlington, Vermont approved ranked-choice voting for use in mayoral elections with a 64% vote in 2005. [221] The 2006 Burlington mayoral race was decided after two rounds of tallying, and the mayoral race in 2009 was decided in three rounds. Unlike Burlington's first RCV mayoral election in 2006, the RCV winner in 2009 (VT Progressive candidate Bob Kiss) was neither the same as the plurality winner (Republican Kurt Wright) nor the majority-preferred candidate (Democrat Andy Montroll). [222]

The results caused a post-election controversy regarding the RCV method. [223] In late 2009, a group of several Democrats (who supported Republican Kurt Wright) led a signature drive to force a referendum on RCV. [224] RCV was repealed in March 2010 by a vote of 52% to 48%. [225] [226] [227]

Washington

Pierce County (2006–2009)

Pierce County, Washington, passed (53%) ranked-choice voting in November 2006 for most of its county offices. [228] Voters upheld the 2008 implementation timing with a vote of 67% in 2007 and made minor adjustments to the charter language involving ballot access and numbers of rankings. [229] Seven RCV elections took place on November 4, 2008 and one on November 3, 2009. [230] The introduction of RCV was marked by controversies about costs and voter confusion. On November 3, 2009, voters repealed RCV. [231]

Rejected implementations

The city of Vancouver, Washington voted in 1999 to adopt RCV and the state legislature enacted enabling legislation in 2004, but the city in 2006 chose not to exercise its option. In Washington, an initiative seeking to adopt RCV in 2005 failed to garner enough signatures. In 2008, Vermont governor Jim Douglas vetoed legislation which would have established RCV for that state's congressional elections starting that year. [232]

San Juan County, Washington put RCV to a vote in November 2022 and rejected the proposal, with 57% voting against. [233] Voters in Clark County, Washington rejected RCV that same day, with 58% electing to keep their system unchanged. [234]

State ballot initiatives

Massachusetts (2020)

Massachusetts rejected Ballot Question 2 in the 2020 general election, which would have authorized ranked-choice voting for "primary and general elections for all Massachusetts statewide offices, state legislative offices, federal congressional offices, and certain other offices beginning in 2022," but not "for President of the United States, county commissioner, or regional district school committee members." [235]

Arizona (2024)

Arizona Proposition 140 was rejected by voters in 2024. [236] It would have implemented a nonpartisan blanket primary, with the Arizona Legislature deciding how many candidates advance to the general election. Depending on how many candidates advanced, the Legislature would have been authorized to implement ranked choice voting. [237]

Colorado (2024)

Colorado voters rejected Proposition 131 in 2024, which if passed would have implemented a nonpartisan blanket primary where the top four candidates advance to a ranked-choice voting general election. [238] [239]

Idaho (2024)

Idaho voters broadly rejected a top-four nonpartisan jungle primary ballot measure in November 2024 by nearly 70% voting "No" (opposed). If it had passed it would have implemented a nonpartisan jungle primary where the top four candidates advance to a ranked-choice voting general election. [240] [241]

Nevada (2022/2024)

In the 2022 Nevada elections, voters narrowly approved Question 3, which proposed replacing party primaries with a single nonpartisan blanket primary where the top 5 candidates would advance to a general election that uses ranked-choice voting. [242] [243] [244] [245] Because the proposal would have modified the Nevada constitution, it had to be reapproved by Nevada voters in 2024 before it could take effect. In 2024, voters rejected the initiative by double digits. [246] If reapproved, the system would have taken effect for the 2026 election cycle and been used for all state and federal elections in Nevada except President and Vice President. [247] [248] [249]

Montana (2024)

Two rejected initiatives on the 2024 ballot in Montana, CI-126 and CI-127, may potentially have caused ranked choice voting to be implemented. CI-126 would have created a nonpartisan blanket primary where the top four candidates advance to the general election. CI-127 would have mandated that the winning candidate receive 50% of the vote, but the Montana Legislature would have decided whether this is accomplished by ranked choice voting or a runoff election. [250] [251]

Oregon (2024)

Oregon rejected a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment in 2024 which, if passed, would have adopted ranked-choice voting for subsequent elections for both federal offices (U.S. president, senator and representative) and state constitutional officers (governor, secretary of state, attorney general, state treasurer, and commissioner of labor and industries), as well as allowed local government bodies to adopt ranked-choice voting unless prohibited by local charter. [252] [253] [254]

Proposed laws

The proposed Fair Representation Act would amend several laws including the Help America Vote Act and the Reapportionment Act of 1929 to mandate the conversion of all congressional districts from single- to multi-member districts elected by RCV as well as the creation of state-level nonpartisan redistricting commissions for congressional redistricting. [255] [256] [257] [258] Originally introduced in 2017 during the 115th Congress by Don Beyer (D–VA), it was reintroduced by Beyer in 2019, 2021, and 2024. [259] [260] For Beyer the goal of the bill is to reduce polarization and partisanship by incentivizing elected representatives to appeal to a broader range of voters. According to proponents, ranked choice voting and multi-seat districts would reduce the number of safe-seat districts and encourage more political competition. [261]

Other uses

The Academy Awards used ranked-choice voting, as do many student government elections. [262]

Discussion

Ranked-choice voting has been advocated for as expanding choice by encouraging more candidates to run. [263] Proponents have argued that ranked choice voting can reduce the spoiler effect from minor and third-party candidates. [264] [265] Ranked-choice advocates often emphasize that it can sometimes produce clear majority winners where plurality rules would not. [266]

Opponents have argued that ranked choice voting is confusing and causes more ballot errors, and that it could disenfranchise poorer, minority and less educated voters. [267] [268] [269] Survey research has shown that voters are less comfortable with ranked choice voting than the simpler runoff or plurality methods. [263] Opponents have also noted that ranked-choice voting does not fully prevent vote splitting. [270] [271] [272] [273] In a nonpartisan primary followed by ranked choice voting, as used in Alaska, vote splitting can occur between multiple candidates of the same party. [274] [275] [276]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-round system</span> Voting system

The two-round system, also called ballotage, top-two runoff, or two-round plurality, is a single winner voting method. It is sometimes called plurality-runoff, although this term can also be used for other, closely-related systems such as instant-runoff voting or the exhaustive ballot. It falls under the class of plurality-based voting rules, together with instant-runoff and first-past-the-post (FPP). In a two-round system, if no candidate receives a majority of the vote in the first round, the two candidates with the most votes in the first round proceed to a second round where all other candidates are excluded. Both rounds are held under choose-one voting, where the voter marks a single favored candidate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FairVote</span> U.S. electoral reform organization

FairVote is a 501(c)(3) organization and lobbying group in the United States. It was founded in 1992 as Citizens for Proportional Representation to support the implementation of proportional representation in American elections. Its focus changed over time to emphasize instant-runoff voting (IRV), a national popular vote, and universal voter registration. It changed its name to the Center for Voting and Democracy in 1993 and to FairVote in 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optional preferential voting</span> Type of preferential voting system

One of the ways in which ranked voting systems vary is whether an individual vote must express a minimum number of preferences to avoid being considered invalid.

Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is a ranked voting method used in single-winner elections. IRV is also known outside the US as the alternative vote (AV). Today it is in use at a national level to elect the Australian House of Representatives, the National Parliament of Papua New Guinea, the President of Ireland and President of India. In Australia it is also used for elections to the legislative assemblies of all states and territories except Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory, and for the Tasmanian Legislative Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in Colorado</span>

Electoral reform in Colorado refers to efforts to change the voting laws in the Centennial State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instant-runoff voting</span> Single-winner ranked-choice electoral system

Instant-runoff voting (IRV), is a single-winner, multi-round elimination rule that uses ranked voting to simulate a series of runoff elections. In each round, the last-place finisher according to a plurality vote is eliminated, and the votes supporting the eliminated choice are transferred to their next available preference until one of the options reaches a majority of the remaining votes. Instant runoff falls under the plurality-with-elimination family of voting methods, and is thus closely related to rules like the exhaustive ballot and two-round runoff system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Burlington mayoral election</span> American municipal election in Vermont

The 2009 Burlington mayoral election was the second mayoral election since the city's 2005 change to instant-runoff voting (IRV), also known as ranked-choice voting (RCV), after the 2006 mayoral election. In the 2009 election, incumbent Burlington mayor won reelection as a member of the Vermont Progressive Party, defeating Kurt Wright in the final round with 48% of the vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranked voting</span> Voting systems that use ranked ballots

Ranked voting is any voting system that uses voters' rankings of candidates to choose a single winner or multiple winners. More formally, a ranked system is one that depends only on which of two candidates is preferred by a voter, and as such does not incorporate any information about intensity of preferences. Ranked voting systems vary dramatically in how preferences are tabulated and counted, which gives them very different properties. In instant-runoff voting (IRV) and the single transferable vote system (STV), lower preferences are used as contingencies and are only applied when all higher-ranked preferences on a ballot have been eliminated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unified primary</span> Single-winner electoral system

A unified primary is an electoral system for narrowing the field of candidates for a single-winner election, similar to a nonpartisan blanket primary, but using approval voting for the first round, advancing the top-two candidates, allowing voters to confirm the majority-supported candidate in the general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">June 2018 Maine Question 1</span>

Maine Question 1 was a people's veto referendum that appeared on the June 12, 2018 statewide ballot. It sought to reject a law passed by the Maine Legislature that suspended the implementation of ranked-choice voting, authorized by Maine voters in a previous referendum, for use in Maine elections until and if an amendment to the Maine Constitution is passed to expressly permit it; failing that, the law would be automatically repealed in 2021. It qualified because supporters of the original referendum collected the necessary number of signatures from registered Maine voters. This vote coincided with primary elections in which party nominees for governor, U.S. Senate, U.S. House, and the Maine Legislature were chosen through RCV to run in general elections on November 6.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Maine Question 5</span> Referendum on instant-runoff voting

Maine Question 5, formally An Act to Establish Ranked-Choice Voting, is a citizen-initiated referendum question that qualified for the Maine November 8, 2016 statewide ballot. It was approved by a vote of 52% in favor, 48% opposed. It sought to change how most Maine elections will be conducted from plurality voting to instant-runoff voting. It appeared on the ballot along with elections for President of the United States, Maine's two U.S. House seats, the legislature, five other ballot questions, and various local elections. The referendum was successful, making Maine the first state to use ranked choice voting for its federal elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">STAR voting</span> Single-winner electoral system

STAR voting is an electoral system for single-seat elections. The name stands for "Score Then Automatic Runoff", referring to the fact that this system is a combination of score voting, to pick two finalists with the highest total scores, followed by an "automatic runoff" in which the finalist who is preferred on more ballots wins. It is a type of cardinal voting electoral system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 Oakland mayoral election</span>

The 2014 Oakland mayoral election was held on November 4, 2014 to elect the mayor of Oakland, California. It saw the election of Libby Schaaf, who unseated incumbent mayor Jean Quan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 Oakland mayoral election</span>

The 2010 Oakland mayoral election was held on November 2, 2010, to elect the mayor of Oakland, California, electing Jean Quan to be their mayor. In early August 2010, incumbent mayor Ron Dellums announced that he would not be seeking reelection to a second term. In November 2010, Oakland also instant-runoff voting to elect its mayor, three city council races and four other local offices, with the elections for the mayor and Oakland council district four requiring multiple rounds of counting. Oakland used instant-runoff voting in the city's remaining elected offices in 2012. IRV was again used in 2014 and 2016, including in the 2014 mayoral election in which incumbent Jean Quan was defeated by Libby Schaaf.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Massachusetts Question 2</span>

Massachusetts Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative, also known as Question 2, was an initiative at the 2020 Massachusetts general election that would have changed primaries and elections in Massachusetts from plurality voting to ranked-choice voting (RCV) for all Massachusetts statewide offices, state legislative offices, federal congressional offices, and certain other offices beginning in 2022. RCV would not be extended to elections for president, county commissioner, or regional district school committee member. The initiative failed, with 54.8% of voters voting 'No' and 45.2% 'Yes'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Top-four primary</span> Nonpartisan blanket primary

A final-four or final-five primary is an electoral system using a nonpartisan primary by multi-winner plurality in the first step.

In the alternative vote, ballot exhaustion occurs when a voter's ballot can no longer be counted, because all candidates on that ballot have been eliminated from an election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center squeeze</span> Type of independence of irrelevant alternatives violation

Center squeeze is a kind of independence of irrelevant alternatives violation seen in a number of election rules, such as two-round and instant runoff, for example. In a center squeeze, the Condorcet winner is eliminated before they have the chance to face any of the other candidates in a one-on-one race. The term can also refer to tendency of such rules to encourage polarization among elected officials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 Colorado Proposition 131</span> Ballot measure in Colorado regarding ranked-choice voting

2024 Colorado Proposition 131 is a proposed ballot measure that will appear before voters in Colorado during the 2024 general election. The citizen initiated proposition would replace Colorado's current partisan primaries with non-partisan blanket primaries and would implement ranked-choice (instant-runoff) voting for most statewide and state legislative general elections in which the top four candidates in the primary would qualify for the general election ballot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oregon Ballot Measure 117</span>

Oregon Ballot Measure 117, the Ranked-Choice Voting for Federal and State Elections Measure, is a proposed Oregon state initiative that will be decided by voters as part of the 2024 Oregon elections on November 5, 2024. If approved, primary and general elections for statewide and federal offices would be done through ranked-choice (instant-runoff) voting as opposed to the current plurality voting system, starting in 2028. It would also make the office of the secretary of state provide voter education on how to use the system.

References

  1. ↑ "WHERE IS RCV USED?". RCV Resources. Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
  2. 1 2 "Where is Ranked Choice Voting Used?". FairVote. Retrieved July 8, 2023.
  3. 1 2 "Perspective | How ranked-choice voting saved the Virginia GOP from itself". Washington Post. November 5, 2021. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  4. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting in Utah". Utah Ranked Choice Voting. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  5. ↑ "2020 State Convention". The Indiana Republican Party. May 20, 2020. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  6. ↑ Hoag, Clarence Gilbert (1914). Effective Voting: An Article on Preferential Voting and Proportional Representation. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  7. ↑ "New York's proportional representation experiment demonstrates potential of fair representation". December 18, 2017.
  8. 1 2 Parks, Miles (December 13, 2023). "Ranked choice is 'the hot reform' in democracy. Here's what you should know about it". NPR.
  9. ↑ "Ranked choice voting history". City of Minneapolis. Retrieved July 3, 2016.
  10. 1 2 Wackerle, Curtis (November 3, 2010). "City voters repeal IRV". Aspen Daily News. Retrieved January 2, 2018.
  11. 1 2 McCrea, Lynne (March 3, 2010). "Burlington Voters Repeal Instant Runoff Voting". Vermont Public Radio. Retrieved January 2, 2018.
  12. ↑ "All Info - H.R.4000 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Fair Representation Act". U.S. Congress. August 28, 2019. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
  13. ↑ "A Congress for Every American: One way to improve the "People's House": elect multiple members per district". The New York Times. November 10, 2018. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  14. ↑ "Maine became the first state in the country Tuesday to pass ranked choice voting". November 10, 2016. Retrieved November 10, 2016.
  15. ↑ "Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court". May 23, 2017.
  16. ↑ Thistle, Scott (October 24, 2017). "Legislature delays and potentially repeals ranked-choice voting". Portland Press Herald. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  17. ↑ Russell, Eric (June 12, 2018). "Mainers vote to keep ranked-choice voting, with supporters holding commanding lead". Portland Press Herald. Retrieved June 13, 2018.
  18. ↑ Mistler, Steve (November 13, 2018). "In Tight Race, Maine Republican Sues To Block State's Ranked-Choice Voting Law". NPR.
  19. ↑ Harrison, Judy (November 15, 2018). "Poliquin vows to push forward with his legal challenge to ranked-choice voting after loss". Bangor Daily News. Bangor Publishing Company. Retrieved September 13, 2020.
  20. ↑ "Ranked-Choice Voting Delivers Democrats A House Seat". NPR. November 15, 2018. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
  21. ↑ "Poliquin campaign asks for CD2 recount". WCSH. November 26, 2018. Retrieved November 26, 2018.
  22. ↑ Mistler, Steve; Leary, Mal (December 17, 2018). "Poliquin Decides To End Recount In Maine's 2nd District Race". Maine Public. Retrieved September 13, 2020.
  23. 1 2 Mistler, Steve (December 21, 2018). "Poliquin's Request To Block Certification Of 2nd District Election". mainepublic.org. Retrieved December 21, 2018.
  24. ↑ "Judge denies Polquin's request to stop rank-choice voting process". WGME. November 15, 2018.
  25. ↑ "RCV Fight: Poliquin calls for 'new election' if judge does not rule against ranked-choice". newscentermaine.com. November 28, 2018.
  26. ↑ Collins, Steve; Journal, Sun (December 13, 2018). "Federal court rules against Bruce Poliquin's challenge of ranked-choice voting". Lewiston Sun Journal. Retrieved December 19, 2018.
  27. ↑ Murphy, Edward (December 24, 2018). "Poliquin drops challenge to ranked-choice voting, clearing way for Golden to take seat in Congress". The Portland Press Herald . Retrieved December 25, 2018.
  28. ↑ "Poliquin ends ranked-choice voting lawsuit". WMTW News 8. December 24, 2018. Retrieved December 25, 2018.
  29. ↑ Chaitin, Daniel (December 24, 2018). "GOP lawmaker drops challenge to Maine's ranked-choice voting". The Washington Examiner . Retrieved December 25, 2018.
  30. ↑ Burke, Michael (December 24, 2018). "GOP lawmaker to drop challenge to Maine's new voting system". The Hill . Retrieved December 25, 2018.
  31. ↑ Miller, Kevin (August 26, 2019). "Maine Senate passes ranked-choice voting for March presidential primaries". Portland Press Herald . Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  32. ↑ Shepherd, Michael (August 28, 2019). "Maine might switch to a ranked-choice presidential election. Here's how it would look". CBS 13. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  33. ↑ Shepherd, Michael (September 6, 2019). "Maine will use ranked-choice voting in next year's presidential election — but not the 2020 primaries". Bangor Daily News . Retrieved September 6, 2019.
  34. ↑ Piper, Jessica (August 28, 2020). "Maine secretary of state appeals decision putting ranked-choice voting challenge on ballot". Bangor Daily News. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
  35. ↑ Leary, Mal (August 28, 2020). "Maine Secretary Of State Will Appeal Ruling On Ranked-Choice Voting Citizen Initiative". www.mainepublic.org. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
  36. ↑ "Judge: Ranked-Choice Voting Repeal Qualifies For Maine November Ballot". www.wbur.org. August 26, 2020. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
  37. ↑ Mannino, Gabrielle (September 8, 2020). "Ranked choice voting for president still uncertain following court ruling". newscentermaine.com. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  38. ↑ "Maine ballots sent to printer with ranked-choice voting for president, no people's veto". WGME. September 9, 2020. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  39. ↑ Reimann, Nicholas (September 8, 2020). "Maine Will Be The First-Ever State To Use Ranked-Choice Voting For A Presidential Election". Forbes. Retrieved September 11, 2020.
  40. ↑ Mannino, Gabrielle (September 22, 2020). "Court rules in favor of Sec. of State clearing way for RCV in presidential election". newscentermaine.com. Retrieved September 22, 2020.
  41. ↑ Howe, Amy (October 6, 2020). "Breyer rejects Republicans' plea to stop ranked-choice voting in Maine". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved October 7, 2020.
  42. ↑ Berman, Russell (September 20, 2019). "A Step Toward Blowing Up the Presidential-Voting System". The Atlantic. Retrieved January 14, 2020.
  43. ↑ Muller, Derek T. (July 10, 2019). "Maine, ranked choice voting, and the National Popular Vote Compact". Excess of Democracy. Retrieved January 14, 2020.
  44. ↑ "Alaska Ballot Measure 2, Top-Four Ranked-Choice Voting and Campaign Finance Laws Initiative (2020)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  45. ↑ "Sarah Palin loses comeback bid in Alaska vote to Democrat". BBC News. September 1, 2022. Retrieved September 1, 2022.
  46. ↑ Brooks, James (August 23, 2024). "Alaska Supreme Court upholds ranked choice repeal initiative, now bound for November vote • Alaska Beacon". Alaska Beacon. Retrieved August 23, 2024.
  47. ↑ Jungworth, Haly (July 21, 2022). "HAWAII PASSES RANKED CHOICE VOTING LEGISLATION". Fair Vote . Retrieved August 8, 2024.
  48. ↑ Blair, Chad (May 1, 2022). "Here Are Some Good Ideas That Are Poised To Make It Through The Legislature". Honolulu Civil Beat . Retrieved August 8, 2024.
  49. ↑ Kraushaar, Josh (December 21, 2009). "GOP sets sights on blue Hawaii". POLITICO. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
  50. ↑ Spangler, Sam (October 24, 2022). "Ranked choice elections coming to Hawaii". KHON2 . Retrieved August 8, 2024.
  51. ↑ Flynn, Megan (July 21, 2023). "D.C. ranked-choice voting ballot initiative clears first hurdle". Washington Post. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  52. ↑ Robertson, Thomas (November 6, 2024). "DC voters pass Initiative 83, vote to keep indicted Council member White in office". WTOP News. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  53. ↑ "Measure I: Election Consolidation Charter Amendment - Alameda County, CA". www.smartvoter.org.
  54. 1 2 "California Local Government News". PublicCEO. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  55. 1 2 Ranked Choice Voting Results Table (PDF). Acvote.org (Report). Alameda County Registrar of Voters. November 2, 2010. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  56. ↑ Knight, Heather (November 8, 2006). "Offbeat and practical issues taken up around Bay Area". San Francisco Chronicle. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  57. 1 2 "Ranked-Choice Voting". AC Vote. Registrar of Voters. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  58. ↑ "Ojai City Council election results finalized for 3 seats, 2 measures". Ventura County Star . December 9, 2022. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  59. ↑ "Ojai City Council election results finalized for 3 seats, 2 measures". VC Star. Camarillo, CA. December 9, 2022. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  60. ↑ "OFFICIAL FINAL RESULTS". Clarity Elections. Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters. December 7, 2022. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  61. ↑ "San Francisco Ballot Propositions Database". sfpl.org. San Francisco Public Library. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  62. ↑ "And It's 1, 2, 3: That's What We're Fighting For | Scoop News". Scoop.co.nz. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  63. ↑ "Center for Voting and Democracy". Archive.fairvote.org. November 7, 2000. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  64. ↑ Holmes, Tim (January 20, 2010). "City Council Approves Ranked Choice Voting - Election is Nov. 2, 2010". San Leandro Bytes. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  65. ↑ "Palm Desert finalizes voting district map, delays ranked-choice voting for two years". Desert Sun. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  66. ↑ "PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETINGS - Virtual Meeting". Palm Desert: E Scribe Meetings. May 14, 2020. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  67. 1 2 Steven, Hill (November 4, 2022). "Ranked choice voting's Big Adventure on November 8". Substack. Demorcay SOS. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  68. 1 2 "2020's Elections Show Mixed Results for Democracy Reform". Sightline Institute. November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  69. ↑ Guilfoil, Jackson (June 19, 2024). "Eureka council roundup | Ballot initiative, ranked-choice voting, city budget discussed". The Times Standard. Eureka, California. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  70. 1 2 3 Hatfield, Sonia (December 21, 2021). "Ranked Choice Voting" (PDF). leg.colorado.gov/lcs. Legislative Council Staff. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
  71. ↑ "It's six (and one) for Basalt town election". AspenTimes.com. Archived from the original on February 8, 2012. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  72. ↑ "2020 General Election November 3, 2020". Boulder County Elections. Boulder County. November 24, 2020. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
  73. ↑ "2023 Coordinated Election November 7, 2023". Boulder County Elections. Boulder County. December 6, 2023. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
  74. ↑ "November 2, 2021 Coordinated Election". Clarity Elections. Clerk and Recorder City and County of Broomfield. November 21, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
  75. ↑ "Town of Carbondale Abstract of Votes Cast at a Special Municipal Election Held in Carbondale, CO 81623" (PDF). Ballotpedia. Carbondale. April 30, 2003. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
  76. ↑ Vo, Thy (March 12, 2021). "Just four Colorado cities use ranked-choice voting. Democratic lawmakers want to make it easier for others to adopt". The Colorado Sun . Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  77. ↑ Zialcita, Paolo (November 16, 2022). "Fort Collins appears on track to approve ranked choice voting starting in 2025". Colorado Public Radio . Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  78. ↑ Staff, CBSColorado com (December 5, 2023). "Election-related measures being considered in Colorado - CBS Colorado". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
  79. ↑ Agnew, Duncan (November 8, 2022). "Evanston endorses ranked choice voting in a landslide". evanstonroundtable.com. Retrieved November 10, 2022.
  80. ↑ "Portland returns to electing its mayor - The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram". Pressherald.com. November 3, 2010. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  81. ↑ Koenig, Seth (November 9, 2011). "Brennan to become Portland's first popularly elected mayor in 88 years — Portland — Bangor Daily News — BDN Maine". Bangordailynews.com. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  82. ↑ "Portland voters to decide expansion of ranked-choice voting". wmtw.com. November 19, 2019. Retrieved January 1, 2020.
  83. ↑ "Westbrook, Maine, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (November 2021)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  84. ↑ "Assessing Instant Runoff Voting in Takoma Park (MD)". FairVote.org. March 28, 2007. Retrieved November 12, 2016.
  85. ↑ "Easthampton residents vote "yes" for ranked-choice voting for mayor, council". WWLP. November 6, 2019. Retrieved November 6, 2019.
  86. ↑ Historic:Easthampton, MA used #RankedChoiceVoting for the first time (Video) (Facebook Reel). Easthampton, Massachusetts: Voter Choice Massachusetts. Retrieved June 29, 2024.
  87. ↑ "Ranked-Choice Voting Commission". Town of Amherst. Retrieved December 30, 2019.
  88. ↑ "Amherst Home Rule Charter". Town of Amherst. Retrieved December 30, 2019.
  89. 1 2 Russell, Jim (July 27, 2021). "No ranked choice voting in Amherst this year". masslive. Retrieved August 12, 2024.
  90. ↑ "Ann Arbor voters say yes to significantly reforming city elections". mlive. November 3, 2021. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  91. ↑ "Ranked-choice voting passed in three cities, but Michigan law prohibits it". bridgemi. November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  92. ↑ "East Lansing, Michigan, Ballot Question 3, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative". bridgemi. November 7, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  93. ↑ "Results at a glance". Daily Tribune. November 3, 2004. Archived from the original on January 20, 2008. Retrieved August 26, 2009.
  94. ↑ "Ranked-choice voting passed in three cities, but Michigan law prohibits it". bridgemi. November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  95. ↑ "Kalamazoo approves Ranked Choice Voting for mayor, city commissioner elections". bridgemi. August 7, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  96. ↑ "Ranked-choice voting passed in three cities, but Michigan law prohibits it". bridgemi. November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  97. ↑ "Royal Oak, Michigan, Proposal B, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative". bridgemi. November 7, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2024.
  98. 1 2 Collins, Terry (November 8, 2006). "Measure to overhaul municipal races passes". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on November 2, 2007. Retrieved November 2, 2007.
  99. 1 2 Brandt, Steve (July 22, 2009). "List of filers for Minneapolis city offices now complete". StarTribune.com. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  100. ↑ "Saint Louis Park Becomes Latest U.S. City to Adopt Ranked Choice Voting". Fair Vote Minnesota. April 16, 2018. Retrieved January 10, 2019.
  101. ↑ "Saint Paul Adopts Instant Runoff Voting | St. Paul Better Ballot Campaign". Archived from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved January 20, 2010.
  102. ↑ "St. Paul shapes new voting system | StarTribune.com". Star Tribune . Archived from the original on February 12, 2011. Retrieved February 12, 2011.
  103. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting History". Minnetonka MN. City of Minnetonka. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
  104. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting". Bloomington MN. City of Bloomington. May 8, 2020. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
  105. ↑ Declaration of the Results of the City General Election Held November 2, 2021 (PDF) (Report). City of Bloomington. November 10, 2021. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
  106. ↑ "Regular Municipal Election – March 4, 2008", City of Santa Fe.
  107. ↑ Last, T.S.; Oswald, Mark (January 9, 2018). "Supreme Court clears way for ranked-choice voting in Santa Fe". Albuquerque Journal. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  108. ↑ Stelnicki, Tripp (June 4, 2018). "Second city in New Mexico opts for ranked-choice". The Santa Fe New Mexican. Retrieved July 11, 2018.
  109. ↑ "New York City Ballot Question 1, Elections Charter Amendment: Ranked-Choice Voting, Vacancies, and City Council Redistricting Timeline (November 2019)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved November 6, 2019.
  110. ↑ "Final Report". 2019 New York City Charter Revision Commission. August 2, 2019.
  111. ↑ "Ranked-Choice Voting: What It Is And What We Need To Do As A Community". Queens Jewish Link. January 6, 2021.
  112. ↑ "Benton County Elections, Oregon - General Election November 8, 2016" (PDF). November 22, 2016. Retrieved January 29, 2023.
  113. ↑ "Better Ballots for Benton". Archived from the original on November 14, 2016. Retrieved November 13, 2016.
  114. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting". Corvallis Oregon. City of Corvallis. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  115. ↑ CITY OF CORVALLIS COUNCIL ACTION MINUTES (Report). City of Corvallis. January 18, 2022. p. 1. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  116. ↑ Mann, Cody (January 22, 2023). "A closer look at ranked choice voting in Corvallis". Corvallis Gazette-Times . Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  117. ↑ Hayden, Nicole (November 9, 2022). "Ranked choice voting on the way for Multnomah County elections". The Oregonian/OregonLive . Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  118. 1 2 Rush, Claire (November 15, 2022). "Portland, Ore., voters OK drastic overhaul of city government". Los Angeles Times . Associated Press . Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  119. 1 2 Diop, Nakeshia; Lee, Jay (October 12, 2022). "A Guide to Portland's Charter Change". Sightline Institute. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  120. 1 2 Jessie Scanlon (October 17, 2018). "Could Maine's new ranked-choice voting change American elections?". Boston Globe Magazine.
  121. ↑ Stenquist, Jeffrey (February 23, 2021). "Municipal Alternative Voting Methods Pilot Project Amendments" (PDF). Utah Legislature. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  122. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "SLC to move to ranked choice voting". KSTU. April 21, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
  123. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 "Ranked Choice Voting". Better Utah Institute. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  124. 1 2 3 "7 Utah County cities plan to use ranked-choice voting". AP NEWS. April 22, 2021. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
  125. ↑ "Newton Town Council". RCVis. November 2, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  126. ↑ Election Report for the City of Heber (Report). Heber City. November 16, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  127. ↑ Hufham, Anastasia (April 29, 2021). "Ranked-choice voting heads to Moab". Moab Sun News. Retrieved January 29, 2023.
  128. ↑ Official Tabulation of Election Returns (Report). Moab City Council. November 16, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  129. ↑ "Nibley Mayor". RCVis. November 2, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  130. ↑ "Nibley city council". RCVis. November 2, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  131. ↑ "River Heights City Council". RCVis. November 2, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  132. ↑ Lamdin, Courtney. "Can Once-Maligned Ranked-Choice Voting Make a Comeback in Burlington?". Seven Days.
  133. ↑ "Voters approve all Burlington ballot issues". March 3, 2021.
  134. ↑ "Burlington, Vermont, Question 4, Ranked-Choice Voting Amendment (March 2021)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
  135. ↑ "Ranked Choice voting". City of Burlington. Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  136. ↑ "Emma Mulvaney-Stanak elected mayor of Burlington, 1st woman to lead the city | News From The States" . Retrieved October 30, 2024.
  137. 1 2 "HB 1103". Virginia General Assembly.
  138. 1 2 "Ranked Choice Voting". Arlington County Voting and Elections. Arlington County. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  139. ↑ Blankship, Donna Gordon (November 23, 2022). "Seattle narrowly approves ranked-choice voting". Crosscut . Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  140. 1 2 "Ranked Choice Voting in Seattle". King County.
  141. ↑ Carpenter, Tim (March 20, 2023). "Proposal for 2024 presidential primary in Kansas draws bipartisan support in Senate". Kansas Reflector. Retrieved August 2, 2023.
  142. ↑ "Wyoming Democratic Caucus moves to only mail-in voting". Wyoming News. Wyoming Tribune Eagle. March 23, 2020 [2020-03-22]. Retrieved August 2, 2023.
  143. ↑ Daley, David (July 9, 2019). "Ranked Choice Voting Is On a Roll: 6 States Have Opted In for the 2020 Democratic Primary". In These Times. ISSN   0160-5992 . Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  144. ↑ "How ranked choice voting will affect Democratic presidential primary". FairVote.org. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  145. ↑ "Biden awarded 10 national delegates in Wyoming primary". The Sheridan Press. April 20, 2020. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
  146. ↑ "Wisconsin's primary is in chaos — but Wyoming's isn't: A lesson in democracy". Salon. April 4, 2020. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
  147. ↑ "Center for Voting and Democracy". FairVote.org. Archived from the original on July 24, 2008. Retrieved May 13, 2009.
  148. ↑ "May 8". FairVote.org. Archived from the original on December 5, 2008. Retrieved May 13, 2009.
  149. ↑ "Cache County Republican Party By-Laws" (PDF). March 20, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 6, 2009. Retrieved May 13, 2009.
  150. ↑ Schmidt, Markus (December 24, 2014). "Kevin Sullivan defends firehouse primary for Morrissey's seat - Roanoke Times: Politics". Roanoke.com. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  151. ↑ "Indiana GOP to Use Ranked Choice Voting in Virtual Convention". FairVote. May 14, 2020. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
  152. ↑ IRV for Louisiana's [sic] Overseas Voters (web page), FairVote IRV America, retrieved June 16, 2013
  153. ↑ Penrose, Drew Spencer. "Proven Innovations to Uphold Voting Rights for Overseas Voters". FairVote.org. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  154. ↑ "Where is Ranked Choice Voting Used". FairVote.org. Retrieved April 18, 2021.
  155. ↑ "Initiatives – Pew Center on the States" (PDF). Electionline.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 16, 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2010.
  156. ↑ Proportional Representation League (1915). "Adoption of P. R. by Ashtabula, Ohio". Proportional Representation Review. 26: 3–11. Retrieved June 28, 2024.
  157. ↑ Santucci, Jack (June 15, 2021). "Variants of Ranked-Choice Voting from a Strategic Perspective". Politics and Governance. 9 (2): 344–353. doi: 10.17645/pag.v9i2.3955 . Retrieved June 28, 2024.
  158. ↑ FairVote.org (June 6, 2019). "Eastpointe, Michigan to become first in state to implement ranked choice voting". FairVote. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  159. ↑ "Justice Department Reaches Agreement with City of Eastpointe, Michigan, Under the Voting Rights Act". www.justice.gov. June 5, 2019. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  160. ↑ "General Election - 11/03/2020". Official Election Site of Alameda County. Alameda Registrar of Voters. December 1, 2020. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  161. ↑ City Clerk (November 10, 2022). City of Portland, Maine General Municipal Election on 11/8/2022 (Report). Charter Commission. p. 1. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  162. ↑ Portland Charter Commission – Final Report (Report). Portland Charter Commission. p. 1. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  163. ↑ Hackett, Dennis (November 13, 2023). "New School Committee, city councilors elected in Easthampton". Reminder Publishing. Retrieved December 20, 2023.
  164. ↑ Fabian, Maddie (November 8, 2023). "Easthampton voters back multi-winner ranked choice voting". Daily Hampshire Gazette. Northampton, Massachusetts. Retrieved June 29, 2024.
  165. ↑ FairVote.org (June 6, 2019). "Eastpointe, Michigan to become first in state to implement ranked choice voting". FairVote. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  166. ↑ "Justice Department Reaches Agreement with City of Eastpointe, Michigan, Under the Voting Rights Act". www.justice.gov. June 5, 2019. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
  167. ↑ "Austin, Texas, Proposition E, Ranked Choice Voting Initiative (May 2021)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
  168. ↑ Neely, Christopher (January 15, 2021). "Legality of ranked-choice voting prompts disagreement between supporters, Austin city attorneys". impact. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
  169. ↑ McGlinchy, Audrey (May 3, 2021). "Austin Voters Approved Ranked-Choice Voting. But Whether They'll Get To Use It Is Another Matter". KUT . Retrieved May 4, 2021.
  170. ↑ Kim, Dave (November 6, 2023). "Michigan General Election 2023 Results: Eastpointe". WDET. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  171. ↑ Merchant, Josh (November 6, 2024). "Missouri voters approve ban on ranked choice voting". Missouri Independent. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  172. ↑ McCue, Dan (March 2, 2022). "Tennessee Bans Ranked-Choice Voting in State, Local Elections". The Well News. United States. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  173. ↑ "CS/CS/SB 524: Election Administration". The Florida Senate. Florida State Government. April 26, 2022. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  174. ↑ "HOUSE BILL 179". The Official Website of the Idaho Legislature. The State of Idaho. March 28, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  175. ↑ "prohibit ranked-choice voting". South Dakota Legislature Legislative Research Council. SD Legislative Research Council. March 27, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  176. ↑ "Prohibit use of ranked-choice voting methods". Montana Legislature. The State of Montana. April 27, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  177. ↑ Rosenbaum, Jason (June 5, 2024). "Missouri joins other red states in trying to stamp out ranked choice voting". STLPR. St. louis, Missouri. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  178. ↑ Mueller, Julia (November 7, 2024). "Missouri approves measure to ban ranked-choice voting". The Hill. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  179. 1 2 "Ann Arbor, Michigan, Proposal B, Repeal of Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (April 1976)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved August 12, 2024.
  180. ↑ "Pierce voters nix 'ranked-choice voting' – From Our Corner". blogs.sos.wa.gov. November 10, 2009. Retrieved January 2, 2018.
  181. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting | City of Burlington, Vermont". www.burlingtonvt.gov. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  182. ↑ Stanton, Ryan (November 3, 2021). "Ann Arbor voters say yes to significantly reforming city elections". mlive. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  183. ↑ "Voters approve instant runoff voting". AspenTimes.com. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  184. ↑ "Aspen council adopts instant runoff voting method". AspenTimes.com. Archived from the original on September 8, 2011. Retrieved August 18, 2009.
  185. ↑ "Aspen voter turnout breaks record". AspenTimes.com. Retrieved August 18, 2009.
  186. ↑ "IRV passes first test". AspenTimes.com. Retrieved May 26, 2010.
  187. ↑ [ dead link ]
  188. ↑ "Aspen's May election under review". AspenTimes.com. Retrieved August 18, 2009.
  189. ↑ "Aspen voters to vote on how they vote — again". AspenTimes.com. Retrieved August 18, 2009.
  190. ↑ "Instant runoff voting loses by razor-thin margin | Aspen Daily News Online". Aspendailynews.com. November 4, 2009. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  191. ↑ "City voters repeal IRV | Aspen Daily News Online". Aspendailynews.com. November 3, 2010. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  192. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 25, 2009. Retrieved November 6, 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  193. ↑ Klingsporn, Katie (November 9, 2011). "Stu Fraser wins mayoral race - Telluride Daily Planet: News". Telluridenews.com. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  194. ↑ "Sean Murphy elected new mayor of Telluride - Telluride Daily Planet: News". Telluridenews.com. November 4, 2015. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  195. ↑ "Mayoral Race Too Close to Call, Ashley Story and Elena Levin to serve on Telluride Town Council" (Press release). Telluride, Colorado: Town of Telluride. Election Commission. November 8, 2023.
  196. ↑ Jonathan Marwil, A History of Ann Arbor (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 164–165.
  197. ↑ "Dudum v. Arntz, 640 F. 3d 1098 (2011)". United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  198. ↑ House Bill 1024, General Assembly of North Carolina, Session 2005.
  199. ↑ "Tuesday, August 10, 2010 « Democracy North Carolina Blog". Democracy-nc.org. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  200. ↑ "North Carolina Bar Association News & Events | NCBA News". Ncbar.org. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  201. ↑ "CITIZEN-TIMES: Capital Letters - Post details: No instant-runoff this year". Blogs.citizen-times.com. Archived from the original on July 8, 2012. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  202. ↑ [ dead link ]
  203. ↑ Arnold, Adam (January 22, 2008). "Opinion mixed on Cary's instant-runoff trial". Archived from the original on February 3, 2008. Retrieved August 26, 2009.
  204. ↑ "Critics Take Runoff Concerns To Elections Board - Search - NBC 17". May 18, 2008. Archived from the original on May 18, 2008. Retrieved January 8, 2020.
  205. ↑ "Instant Runoff Voting in the United States: Don Frantz, the only person elected by instant runoff voting in NC speaks out". Instant Runoff Voting in the United States. July 17, 2010. Retrieved January 8, 2020.
  206. ↑ Senate Bill 1263, General Assembly of North Carolina, Session 2007-8
  207. ↑ "Instant Runoff Voting". NC Coalition for Verified Voting. April 30, 2016. Archived from the original on April 30, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2020.
  208. ↑ "Instant Runoff Voting Regrets in NC". NC Voter. August 29, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2020.
  209. ↑ Mccloy, Joyce (August 17, 2008). "Instant Runoff: Messing Up North Carolina Elections and Efforts to Reduce the Damage ~ Protect North Carolina Elections - Stop Instant Runoff Voting". Instant Runoff. Retrieved January 8, 2020.
  210. ↑ "North Carolina General Assembly - Senate Bill 1263 Information/History (2007-2008 Session)". Ncga.state.nc.us. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  211. ↑ Niolet, Benjamin; Beckwith, Ryan Teague (May 8, 2009). "'Patient's bill' also boon to chiropractors, therapists". The News & Observer. Archived from the original on May 11, 2009. Retrieved August 26, 2009.
  212. ↑ [ dead link ]
  213. ↑ "Article 404 - Hendersonville Times-News - Hendersonville, NC". Hendersonville Times-News.
  214. ↑ Harbin, John (April 8, 2011). "Hendersonville votes to keep instant runoff ballots". BlueRidgeNow.com. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  215. ↑ Binker, Mark (August 12, 2013). "Q&A: Changes to NC election laws". WRAL.com. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  216. ↑ "GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA : SESSION 2013 : SESSION LAW 2013-381 : HOUSE BILL 589" (PDF). Ncleg.net. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  217. ↑ WRAL (October 9, 2007). "Polls Close; Turnout Light in Local Elections". WRAL.com. Retrieved February 3, 2019.
  218. ↑ "WakeGOV.com - Election Results". Archived from the original on January 11, 2008. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
  219. ↑ "Cary votes to keep current election method". WRAL.com. April 30, 2009. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  220. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Barber, Kathleen L. (1995). Proportional Representation and Election Reform in Ohio.
  221. ↑ 4. How did this change to IRV come about? Over 64% of Burlington voters voted in favor of the IRV Charter amendment in March, 2005, and it went into effect on May 12, 2005, when the governor signed the ratification bill, H.505, which had been passed by both the House and Senate.
  222. ↑ "Vermont Daily Briefing » Point/Counterpoint: Terry Bouricious Attempts to Rip Professor Gierzynski a New One over Instant Runoff Voting Controversy (Now with All New Gierzynski Update!)". Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved December 30, 2010.
  223. ↑ Baruth, Philip (March 12, 2009). "Voting Paradoxes and Perverse Outcomes: Political Scientist Tony Gierzynski Lays Out A Case Against Instant Runoff Voting". Vermont Daily Briefing. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011.
  224. ↑ "One Person, One Vote Press Conference". CCTV Center for Media and Democracy. December 29, 2009. Retrieved April 10, 2018.
  225. ↑ "Burlington voters repeal IRV". Wcax.com. March 2, 2010. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved March 28, 2016.
  226. ↑ "Instant run-off voting experiment ends in Burlington : Rutland Herald Online". Rutlandherald.com. April 27, 2010. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved April 1, 2016.
  227. ↑ Briggs, John (March 3, 2010). "Instant runoff rejected". The Burlington Free Press. Archived from the original on November 2, 2012.
  228. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting". Archived from the original on January 9, 2008. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
  229. ↑ "November 6, 2007 General Election - Official Results". Archived from the original on February 8, 2008. Retrieved January 27, 2008.
  230. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting Results". Archived from the original on November 8, 2008. Retrieved November 6, 2008.
  231. ↑ Wickert, David W. (November 9, 2009). "Voters Changing their Minds on Ranked-Choice". Tacoma News Tribune.[ dead link ]
  232. ↑ Kinzel, Bob (April 4, 2008). "Douglas vetoes two election bills". Vermont Public Radio. Vermont. Retrieved November 12, 2016.
  233. ↑ Devaux, Nancy (November 10, 2022). "San Juan County voters reject ranked choice voting, spending measures". Salish Current. Washington. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
  234. ↑ Wolf, Sarah (November 8, 2022). "3 of 6 Clark County charter amendments leading". The Columbian. Vancouver, WA. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
  235. ↑ "Massachusetts Information for Voters - 2020 Ballot Questions - State Election, November 3, 2020" (PDF). Commonwealth of Massachusetts. pp. 7–11. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  236. ↑ Sievers, Caitlin (November 6, 2024). "Arizonans reject measure that would open primary elections". Arizona Mirror. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  237. ↑ MacDonald-Evoy, Jerod (August 28, 2024). "Supreme Court lets legislature's description of 'open primaries' measure stand". Arizona Mirror. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
  238. ↑ "Colorado to vote on ranked-choice voting, eliminating partisan primaries". Colorado Public Radio. August 29, 2024. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
  239. ↑ Paul, Jesse (November 6, 2024). "Colorado voters reject Proposition 131, the all-candidate primary and ranked choice election ballot measure". The Colorado Sun. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  240. ↑ "Idaho open primaries supporters say they are on the brink of qualifying ballot initiative". East Idaho News. March 19, 2024. Retrieved March 24, 2024.
  241. ↑ Corbin, Clark (November 6, 2024). "Idaho voters reject Prop 1, the open primaries and ranked-choice voting ballot initiative". Idaho Capital Sun. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  242. ↑ Golonka, Sean (October 25, 2022). "Question 3 backers promote ranked-choice voting with major out-of-state money". Nevadan Independent. p. 1. Retrieved November 12, 2022.
  243. ↑ Richardson, Katelynn (November 10, 2022). "All three Nevada ballot questions seem to have majority support as vote count continues". The Center Square . p. 1. Retrieved November 12, 2022.
  244. ↑ Meyers, David (November 9, 2022). "Ballot measures will change how democracy is practiced in many states". The Fulcrum.
  245. ↑ "Nevada Question 3, Top-Five Ranked Choice Voting Initiative (2022)". Ballotpedia . Retrieved November 12, 2022.
  246. ↑ Mueller, Tabitha (November 6, 2024). "Nevadans reject open primary, ranked-choice voting ballot measure". The Nevada Independent. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  247. ↑ Girnus, April (November 11, 2022). "Question 3: Election reform proposal ekes out victory, will return in 2024". Nevada Current . p. 1. Retrieved November 12, 2022.
  248. ↑ "Nevadans appear to vote in favor of all three ballot measures". KTNV-TV . November 9, 2022. p. 1. Retrieved November 12, 2022.
  249. ↑ "Nevada Top-Five Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2024)". p. 1. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  250. ↑ Ambarian, Jonathon (August 23, 2024). "Montana election reform measures qualify for November ballot as Secretary of State completes certification". KTVH. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
  251. ↑ Sakariassen, Alex (November 6, 2024). "Montana rejects constitutional initiatives to reshape primary and general elections". Montana Free Press. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  252. ↑ "Oregon lawmakers send ranked choice voting proposal to November 2024 ballot". KTVZ. June 25, 2023. Retrieved September 17, 2023.
  253. ↑ "HB2004 2023 Regular Session - Oregon Legislative Information System". olis.oregonlegislature.gov. Retrieved September 17, 2023.
  254. ↑ Fuentes, Carlos; Bach, Jonathan (November 6, 2024). "Voters reject statewide ranked choice voting, Measure 117, by wide margin". oregonlive. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  255. ↑ Board, The Editorial (November 10, 2018). "Opinion | A Congress for Every American". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  256. ↑ Drutman, Lee (April 26, 2017). "This voting reform solves 2 of America's biggest political problems". Vox. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  257. ↑ Berman, Russell (July 6, 2023). "A Radical Idea for Fixing Polarization". The Atlantic. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  258. ↑ "Many voters say Congress is broken. Could proportional representation fix it?". NPR. November 18, 2023.
  259. ↑ Winger, Richard (June 18, 2021). "Congressional Bill for Multi-Member U.S. House Districts". Ballot Access News.
  260. ↑ Ingraham, Christopher (March 2, 2021). "Analysis | How to fix democracy: Move beyond the two-party system, experts say". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  261. ↑ Daley, David (June 27, 2017). "Make democracy great again: Rep. Don Beyer's revolutionary bill could transform how we elect Congress". Salon. Retrieved June 24, 2024.
  262. ↑ Kambhampaty, Anna Purna (November 6, 2019). "New York City Voters Just Adopted Ranked-Choice Voting in Elections". TIME. Retrieved August 29, 2024.
  263. 1 2 Eggers, Andrew; Bouton, Laurent (April 30, 2024). "Primer: Ranked-Choice Voting". Center for Effective Government at The University of Chicago . Retrieved August 28, 2024.
  264. ↑ "Ranked Choice Voting". NCSL. Retrieved October 15, 2022.
  265. ↑ "Explainer: Instant runoff voting". electionlab.mit.edu. April 25, 2023. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
  266. ↑ Sides, John; Shaw, Daron R.; Grossmann, Matthew; Lipsitz, Keena (2023). Campaigns and elections: rules, reality, strategy, choice (Fourth edition, election update ed.). New York London: W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN   978-1-324-04691-2.
  267. ↑ Rubinstein, Dana; Mays, Jeffery C.; Fitzsimmons, Emma G. (December 9, 2020). "Why Some N.Y.C. Lawmakers Want to Rethink Ranked-Choice Voting". The New York Times. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
  268. ↑ Anuta, Joe (September 8, 2021). "Lower-income communities showed less engagement with ranked-choice voting in NYC primary". POLITICO. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
  269. ↑ Cormack, Lindsey (2024). "More Choices, More Problems? Ranked Choice Voting Errors in New York City". American Politics Research . 52 (3): 306–319. doi:10.1177/1532673X231220640 . Retrieved June 19, 2024.
  270. ↑ Graham-Squire, Adam; McCune, David (September 11, 2022). "A Mathematical Analysis of the 2022 Alaska Special Election for US House". p. 2. arXiv: 2209.04764v3 [econ.GN]. Since Begich wins both … he is the Condorcet winner of the election … AK election also contains a Condorcet loser: Sarah Palin. … she is also a spoiler candidate
  271. ↑ Holliday, Wesley H.; Pacuit, Eric (October 1, 2023). "Split Cycle: a new Condorcet-consistent voting method independent of clones and immune to spoilers". Public Choice. 197 (1): 1–62. arXiv: 2004.02350 . doi:10.1007/s11127-023-01042-3. ISSN   1573-7101. and yet with Palin included, Instant Runoff elected the Democrat in the race, making Palin a spoiler
  272. ↑ Holliday, Wesley H. (March 13, 2024). "A simple Condorcet voting method for Final Four elections" . Retrieved March 23, 2024. Hence Begich was the Condorcet winner. … spoiler and Condorcet loser, Palin
  273. ↑ Clelland, Jeanne N. (February 28, 2023), Ranked Choice Voting And the Center Squeeze in the Alaska 2022 Special Election: How Might Other Voting Methods Compare?, arXiv: 2303.00108
  274. ↑ Samuels, Iris (October 11, 2022). "Republican U.S. House candidates in Alaska continue to attack each other while urging voters to 'rank the red'". Anchorage Daily News. Retrieved October 15, 2022. Begich and Palin … split the Republican share of the vote in an August special election, allowing Peltola to come away with the victory
  275. ↑ Mutnick, Ally (August 6, 2024). "Dem-linked super PAC elevates Republicans ahead of Alaska primary". POLITICO. Retrieved August 13, 2024. And if three Republicans are splitting the GOP vote it is easier for Peltola to nab first place — especially if some Republican voters decline to rank their second or third choices as some did in 2022.
  276. ↑ Mueller, Julia (August 25, 2024). "Alaska Republicans unite to defeat Peltola". The Hill. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.