Electoral fraud in the United States

This article is about fraud by voters and fraud within the counting process. For policies or tactics that prevent or dissuade voting, see Voter suppression in the United States.

In the United States, electoral fraud, or voter fraud, ^[1] involves illegal voting in or manipulation of United States elections. Types of fraud include voter impersonation or in-person voter fraud, mail-in or absentee ballot fraud, illegal voting by noncitizens, and double voting. ^{[2] [3] [4]} The United States government defines voter or ballot fraud as one of three broad categories of federal election crimes, the other two being campaign finance crimes and civil rights violations. ^{[1] [5]}

Electoral fraud is extremely rare in the United States, with experts saying mail-in voter fraud occurs more often than in-person voter fraud. ^{[6] [7]} In the last half-century, there have been only scattered examples of electoral fraud affecting the outcomes of United States elections, mostly on the local level. ^[8] Electoral fraud was significantly more prevalent in earlier United States history, particularly in the 19th and early 20th centuries, ^[9] and has long been a significant topic in American politics. ^{[10] [11]} False accusations of electoral fraud also have a long history, and since the 2016 and 2020 elections have often been associated with Donald Trump and the election denial movement in the United States. ^{[12] [13]}

Frequency

Electoral fraud is extremely rare in the United States, ^[21] and it is often accidental when it occurs. ^{[22] [23]} Fraud is more likely to occur in and affect the outcome of local elections, where the potential impact of a small number of votes can be greater. ^{[8] [24] [25] [26]} Some experts have said voter fraud can be difficult to prove, ^[31] depending on the circumstances, ^{[32] [33]} although they consider widespread cheating easy to detect. ^{[34] [35]}

Nationwide databases

In 2012, News21, an Arizona State University journalism project, published a database of 2,068 alleged electoral fraud cases reported between 2000 and 2012. ^[36] This represented about 0.000003 cases for every vote cast. 46 percent of cases also resulted in acquittals, dropped charges or decisions not to bring charges. ^[37] News21 gathered the information by sending public records requests to elections officials and prosecutors and reviewing court records and media reports and created the most comprehensive database to-date of electoral fraud despite not being able to obtain data from all jurisdictions. ^[36] The database also includes instances of voter intimidation. ^[38]

The conservative Heritage Foundation publishes an incomplete database of electoral fraud cases brought by prosecutors since 1979. ^{[39] [40] [41]} As of November 2023, there were 1,465 proven cases of election fraud listed in 44 years, an average of 33 cases per year. This represents a tiny fraction of total votes. In Texas, for example, Heritage found 103 cases of confirmed election fraud between 2005 and 2022, in a period where 107 million ballots were cast, or 0.000096% of all ballots cast. ^[42] Heritage has stated that the database is only a "sampling" and not comprehensive. ^[43]

Voter impersonation

Voter impersonation, or in-person voter fraud, is extremely rare. ^[53] Between 1978 and 2018, no elections were overturned by courts due to voter impersonation fraud. ^[54] Cases of voter impersonation are often difficult to prove. ^{[55] [56]} Rutgers professor Lorraine Minnite has maintained that voter impersonation is illogical from the perspective of the perpetrator due to the high risk and limited upside of casting one vote. ^[57] If caught, perpetrators of voter impersonation can face up to 5 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000 for citizens and deportation for immigrants. ^[57] Proponents of voter identification laws have argued that it can be difficult to detect voter impersonation if voter ID is not required. ^{[58] [59] [60]} University of Virginia law professor Michael D. Gilbert agreed with Minnite in 2014 that theory and evidence suggest voter impersonation "rarely occurs", though agreed with voter ID proponents that "the failure to observe fraud does not mean that no fraud takes place". Gilbert noted that it is difficult for someone to coordinate widespread voter impersonation to steal an election, as even if they paid people to vote in-person for their preferred candidate, the secret ballot ensures they could not confirm whether these people voted the way they were paid to. ^[61]

ABC News reported in 2012 that only four cases of voter impersonation had led to convictions in Texas over the previous decade. ^[57] News21 identified a total of 10 cases of alleged voter impersonation in the United States between 2000 and 2012. ^{[62] [63]} Another 2012 study found no evidence that voter impersonation (in the form of people voting under the auspices of a dead voter) occurred in the 2006 Georgia general elections. ^[64] In a 2013 study, the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI) sent investigators to vote under the names of 63 ineligible voters, who were either deceased, felons or had moved outside New York City. 61 of those investigators were allowed to illegally vote under their assumed identities. One of the two who was not allowed to vote was recognized by the mother of the felon they were impersonating, who worked at the polling place. In five instances, investigators in their 20s or 30s successfully posed as voters age 82 to 94. The DOI report stated that this result, while not large enough to be statistically significant, "indicates vulnerability in the system". ^{[65] [66] [ needs update ]}

In April 2014, Federal District Court Judge Lynn Adelman ruled in Frank v. Walker that Wisconsin's voter ID law was unconstitutional because "virtually no voter impersonation occurs in Wisconsin". ^[67] A 2014 Election Law Journal study of the 2012 election found no evidence of widespread voter impersonation. ^{[68] [69]} In August 2014, Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt reported in The Washington Post 's Wonkblog that he had identified only 31 credible cases of voter impersonation since 2000. ^{[70] [71]} The most serious incident identified involved as many as 24 people trying to vote under assumed names in Brooklyn, which would still not have made a significant difference in most American elections. ^[70] News21 reviewed cases of possible voter impersonation between 2012 and 2016 in five states where politicians had expressed concerns about it, and found no successful state prosecutions for voter impersonation (out of 38 for voter fraud). ^[72]

Mail-in ballot fraud

See also: Postal voting in the United States § Reliability of postal ballots

While quite rare, experts say fraud occurs more often with mailed-in votes than with in-person voting. ^[85] Between 1978 and 2018, at least fourteen elections were invalidated or overturned by courts due to absentee ballot fraud, twelve of which were at the local level (for such offices as county clerk, sheriff, judge, and mayor). ^[54] Postal ballots have been the source of "most significant vote-counting disputes in recent decades" according to Edward Foley, director of the Election Law program at Ohio State University. ^[86] In 2012, The New York Times wrote that according to election administrators, fraud in voting by mail was "far less common than innocent errors" but "vastly more prevalent" than in-person voting fraud. ^[87] University of Chicago political scientist Anthony Fowler said in 2020 that fraudulently voting on behalf of someone else, tampering with ballots, coercion or vote buying could all be easier with mail-in ballots, but that in practice "the risk of widespread fraud is probably very minimal, even with all-mail elections". ^[88]

Loyola Marymount professor Justin Levitt stated in 2020 that misconduct in mail voting is "meaningfully more prevalent" than with voting in person, but that misconduct "still amounts to only a tiny fraction" of mail ballots. ^[84] Lonna Atkeson, an expert in election administration, said about mail-in voting fraud, "It's really hard to find ... The fact is, we really don't know how much fraud there is ... There aren't millions of fraudulent votes, but there are some." ^[84] Lorraine Minnite said "my sense is that it is not much more frequent than in-person voter fraud, which rarely occurs." ^[84] Richard Hasen, a professor at University of California, Irvine School of Law, said that "problems are extremely rare in the five states that rely primarily on vote-by-mail." ^[84]

An analysis by News21 found 491 known cases of absentee ballot fraud between 2000 and 2012. ^{[84] [89] [90] [91]} In April 2020, a voter fraud study covering 20 years by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of mail-in ballot fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 percent" of individual votes nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent – about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning in the United States." ^[92] A 2020 Washington Post analysis of data from three vote-by-mail states (Colorado, Oregon and Washington), with help from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), found that out of about 14.6 million mail votes cast in 2016 and 2018 officials had flagged just 372 possible^{[ needs update ]} cases of double voting or voting on behalf of deceased people. ^[93]

Ballot harvesting, or third parties collecting and delivering absentee ballots for voters, is legal in some states but illegal or restricted in others. ^{[94] [95]} Other types of absentee ballot fraud have included ballot stuffing in absentee drop boxes; ^[96] coercion of voters, since the ballot is not always cast in secret; ^{[97] [98] [99]} requesting absentee ballots on behalf of other voters; ^{[100] [101]} ballots being stolen from the mail and submitted; ^[102] and collection of ballots by dishonest collectors who mark votes or fail to deliver ballots. ^[103] In many cases, ballot drop boxes are placed in locations where they can be monitored by security cameras or election staff. ^[104]

Noncitizen voting

See also: Non-citizen suffrage in the United States § 21st century

Illegal voting by noncitizens is extremely rare. ^[122] This is due in part to the more severe penalties associated with the practice including deportation, up to five years of incarceration or fines, as well as the jeopardizing of naturalization efforts. ^{[123] [124] [125]} The federal form to register a voter requires a unique identification number such as a Social Security or driver's license number. New voters must check a box attesting that they are a citizen, though are not required to provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering. ^{[126] [115]} States typically have safeguards to prevent noncitizen voting, with voter registration and casting a ballot creating a paper trail. ^{[127] [128]} The extent to which states verify citizenship of voters differs. ^{[126] [129]} When noncitizens are added to voter rolls, it is usually by mistake, as the result of a federal law that requires states to offer people voter registration when they visit a motor vehicle office. ^[130] Sometimes it also appears that more noncitizens are on voter rolls than there are because they became naturalized citizens but have not yet been back to the DMV to update their citizenship status in the DMV database. ^[131]

All the research into voter rolls have found very few noncitizen voters. ^{[132] [133]} As of July 2024, The Heritage Foundation database includes only 24 noncitizen voting cases from between 2003 and 2023. ^{[134] [135] [136] [40]} In an audit of the 2016 elections, the North Carolina State Board of Elections found that 41 out of 4.8 million total votes were by noncitizens, ^[137] and between 2017 and 2024, only three cases were referred for prosecution. ^[138] In 2018, CNN reported that in the past three years, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach had convicted three noncitizens of voting out of 1.8 million voters. ^[139] A Brennan Center for Justice study of 2016 data from 42 jurisdictions found an estimated 30 incidents of suspected noncitizen voting out of 23.5 million votes cast (or .0001% of votes). ^{[124] [140]} A review in Georgia found that no potential noncitizens had been allowed to register to vote between 1997 and 2022. ^[109] In September 2024, an audit in Oregon found that more than 1,200 possible noncitizens had been added to the state's voter rolls by mistake; the issue was quickly fixed and no more than 5 noncitizens had cast ballots. ^{[141] [116] [142]}

Some prominent Republicans such as House Speaker Mike Johnson have argued that widespread noncitizen voting is a threat, though such claims have been entirely unsupported by evidence. ^{[106] [143] [144]} At a May 8, 2024, press conference in which Johnson demanded that Congress pass an "election integrity" bill to stop noncitizens from voting, reporters pressed him on the lack of evidence. Johnson replied, "We all know intuitively that a lot of illegals are voting in federal elections, but it's not been something that is easily provable." ^[145] Several Republican-led states have flagged and removed purported noncitizens from voter rolls ranging in the hundreds or thousands. ^[117] These figures have been criticized by voting rights organizations as partisan and erroneously including legal voters, particularly naturalized citizens. ^{[146] [147] [148]} Before the 2014 midterm elections in Florida, then-governor Rick Scott announced a purge of 180,000 suspected foreign nationals from voter rolls, though only 85 names were removed and only one person was prosecuted. ^{[149] [150]} A widely discredited 2014 estimate of noncitizen voting by Jesse Richman and David Earnest was misused by Donald Trump and others to justify false claims it was widespread. ^{[151] [152] [153] [154]} 200 political scientists signed an open letter saying the study should not be cited or used in any debate on voter fraud. ^[155] In 2020 and 2024, the libertarian Cato Institute said that there was no detectable amount of noncitizen voting. ^{[156] [157] [158] [159] [160]} Noncitizens who can vote in the few local elections where it is legal rarely cast ballots. ^[161]

Legal scholar Richard Hasen, who had previously viewed noncitizen voting as a small problem, ^{[166] [ relevant? ]} said in 2020 that claims of noncitizen voting "evaporated in the sunlight of public inspection and legal examination." He also said "spurious claims more likely serve as a pretext for passing laws aimed at making it harder for people likely to vote for Democrats to register and vote." ^[167] San Francisco State University professor and noncitizen voting expert Ron Hayduk referred to noncitizen voting as a "problem that doesn't exist". ^{[115] [168]} Glenn Kessler in The Washington Post stated there was "scattered evidence" of noncitizen voting and little to support the idea that it ever affected the outcome of a major election, but that the scarcity of evidence "does not necessarily prove that the phenomenon does not happen".^{[ vague ][ speculation? ]} He wrote that "if a noncitizen casts a ballot, there is no obvious victim to make a complaint and little public documentation to prove that a voter is not a citizen". ^{[40] [ undue weight? – discuss ][ speculation? ]}

Double voting

Double voting is considered extremely rare. ^[171] When someone votes twice within the same state, it is often inadvertent, for example if a voter thinks their absentee ballot will not be delivered in time. ^[172] As of 2023, the only system that can detect double voting across states is the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), which close to half of states participate in. ^[173] A 2008 Election Law Journal article found that a number of claims from the early 2000s purporting to have found double voters were due largely to the 'Birthday problem', or the statistical probability of people sharing the same name and birthday across multiple states. ^[174] It noted that substantiated instances of double voting are 'notable mostly for their rarity.' ^[174] In 2007, the Secretary of State of Washington checked voter signatures to verify whether or not double-voting occurred among people with the same name and birthday, and the check exonerated all but one person. ^[174]

An American Political Science Review study of voter data from the 2012 United States presidential election estimated that at most 1 in 4,000 voters illegally cast two ballots, though it noted accounting errors could account for most if not all of those numbers. ^[32] The study found that many apparent double-voters were the result of incorrectly marking someone as having voted. ^[169] It also concluded that when two voter records share the same name and birthdate, removing the earlier registration could impede approximately 300 legitimate votes for each double vote prevented. ^[32] Being registered to vote in multiple states without voting in more than one is allowed. ^[175] The legal definition of double voting varies between states, but voting more than once in a given election is illegal under the Voting Rights Act and comes with a fine of up to $10,000 and up to five years in prison. ^[176]

Felony voting

See also: Felony disenfranchisement in the United States

In the United States, depending on the state, a person may have their voting rights suspended or withdrawn due to the conviction of a criminal offense, usually a felony. Felons who cast a ballot in those states often do not know that they were ineligible to vote. ^[177] A North Carolina State Board of Elections audit of the 2016 elections found that 441 felons had voted before their right to vote had been restored. ^[178] Out of 12 people on probation for a felony who were charged with illegal voting in Alamance County, North Carolina in 2016, five stated in separate interviews with The New York Times that they had thought they were allowed to vote. ^[179] At least seven pled down to misdemeanors. ^{[180] [181]} The Guardian reported in 2024 that prosecuting voters who were ineligible due to a felony was the main type of prosecution pursued in Florida. ^[182] In 2022, Florida governor Ron DeSantis arrested more than 20 people who were ineligible to vote related to a felony conviction, nearly all of whom were confused about their eligibility after having received voter registration cards from the state. ^[182]

Voter registration

Outdated voter registration

Outdated voter registration has not been linked to voter fraud despite allegations connecting the two. ^[183] A 2012 report by the Pew Center on the States based on data collected in 2008, found that over 1.8 million dead people were registered to vote nationwide and over 3 million voters were registered in multiple states. ^{[184] [183]} According to PolitiFact, the study investigated "outdated voter rolls, not fraudulent votes". ^[183] In an October 2016 Associated Press fact-check, the author noted these voter registration irregularities left some people concerned that the electoral system was vulnerable to the impersonation of dead voters; however, voter rolls with dead voters are usually due to the states being slow to eliminate dead voters. By 2016, most states had addressed concerns raised by the Pew 2012 report. ^[185] As of October 2024, Michigan had one of the most bloated voter rolls in the nation, with 500,000 more registered voters than citizens of voting age. This has not been connected to fraud, and is caused in part by federal laws restricting the removal of inactive voters. ^[186] In 2020, the Arizona Attorney General investigated 282 claims of dead people voting and found one which was substantiated. The same year, Republican legislators in Michigan found two dead voters in Wayne County out of a list of 200 supposed cases. ^[187]

Registering fake names

Between 2000 and 2012, News21 found 393 cases of alleged voter registration fraud across 34 states, many of which were linked to third-party voter registration groups such as ACORN. This fraud can include registering fake names, often motivated by quotas for third-party canvassers, and have also not been linked to increased voter fraud. ^{[2] [188]}

Vote buying

Vote buying is illegal in the United States at the federal level if money is promised to certain individuals to vote or register to vote, though at the state level, most states only criminalize paying people to vote. ^[189] Promising cash payments to a large number of voters is legal. ^[190] Courts have also historically considered providing free transport to voters legally permissible. ^[191] While illegal vote buying has occurred relatively more often in certain areas such as Appalachia, experts say it is rarely an issue in national-level races. ^[192] Vote buying schemes affected at least six local elections between 2009 and 2012, four of which were in Appalachia. ^[26] Elon Musk has been accused by some election experts of vote buying in the 2024 United States presidential election, with a lottery to give away $1 million daily to a registered voter who signs a petition he created. ^{[193] [194] [195] [196]} Some experts have debated whether Musk paying people $47 for referring a registered voter to the petition, or a program by Cards Against Humanity that would pay up to $100 to 2020 nonvoters who make a plan to vote in 2024, are legal. ^{[197] [198]} A 2020 study in Acta Politica found that around 25% of Americans would be willing to sell their vote for a minimum payment of $418. Democrats and liberal voters were more likely to sell, and the likelihood was not impacted by education or income levels. ^[199]

Other types

A type of fraud that sometimes occurs is falsification of signatures on nominating petitions or ballot initiatives. ^{[200] [201]} Experts say that as the cost of gathering paid signatures goes up, there is a greater incentive for this type of fraud. ^[202] There is a variety of other types of election fraud, with varying prevalence, including:

• Election workers changing or destroying ballots after they arrive. ^{[203] [204] [ improper synthesis? ]}
• Election workers marking ballots as void, so they appear as 'undercounts'. ^{[205] [ better source needed ]}
• Ballot stuffing, where the perpetrator will insert ballots pre-filled to a given candidate. ^{[206] [ additional citation(s) needed ]}
• Helping people to fill out provisional ballots, then discarding those ballots. ^[207]

Notable cases

According to University of Kentucky professor Tracy Campbell, author of the 2005 book Deliver the Vote: A History of Election Fraud, an American Political Tradition – 1742-2004, electoral fraud has historically been "deeply embedded" in American political culture. ^{[10] [11] [208]} In the 1996 book Dirty Little Secrets: The Persistence of Corruption in American Politics, Larry Sabato and Glenn R. Simpson observed that Democrats "feature prominently in almost all of the instances" of fraud in the 19th and 20th century, although Republicans were also fully capable of fraud "when circumstances permit". Sabato and Simpson posited that Democrats have had more opportunities to commit fraud due to more often having control of both local and legislative offices and a greater percentage of their voter base appearing "to be available or more vulnerable to participation". ^[209]

19th century

A glass ballot box was patented in 1858 to prevent electoral fraud.

Electoral fraud was prevalent in the United States during the 19th century, when safeguards against fraud and electioneering were considerably weaker, and political machines wielded significantly more power. Political parties would produce their own ballots, and as of the mid-19th century, seven states still conducted elections by voice voting. States only began to adopt the secret ballot in the 1880s and 1890s. ^[9] Voter fraud was so common that it developed its own vocabulary. "Colonizers" were groups of bought voters who moved en masse between wards. "Floaters" cast ballots for multiple parties, and "repeaters" voted multiple times, sometimes in disguise. ^{[211] [212]} Cooping was a form of fraud where people were kidnapped, drugged and forced to repeatedly vote, and is thought to have contributed to the 1849 death of Edgar Allan Poe. ^{[213] [214]}

Cheating occurred in all parts of the country. Cities such as New York City, Chicago, San Francisco, and Pittsburgh had elections influenced by political machines. ^[215] The Tammany Hall machine in New York City, for example, encouraged residents to vote multiple times by shaving their beards, registered voters under fake names, physically intimidated voters and granted citizenship to newly arrived immigrants. ^[9] Cheating also regularly occurred in suburban and rural areas. Voter fraud and suppression against African-Americans was common in the Jim Crow South. ^[9]

1872 depiction of electoral fraud in Philadelphia

In the 1850s Kansas Territory elections, pro-slavery forces seeking to ratify the Lecompton Constitution carried out voter fraud on multiple occasions by importing pro-slavery people from Missouri to cast ballots. ^{[216] [217]} In the 1876 United States presidential election between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel J. Tilden, voter fraud was widespread, with South Carolina reporting an impossible 101 percent turnout. Violence and intimidation against Black Republican voters also occurred. In four contested states, Republicans and Democrats filed separate tallies favoring their respective candidates. The election was ultimately decided by the Congress-appointed Electoral Commission in favor of Hayes. ^[218]

In the 1888 United States presidential election, there was evidence of voter fraud in some states that favored Republican Benjamin Harrison, particularly in his home state of Indiana. ^[219] Public backlash contributed to the nationwide implementation of secret ballots. ^[211] Two races in the 1888 United States House of Representatives elections were also overturned due to fraud. In Arkansas, John M. Clayton lost to Clifton R. Breckinridge after a ballot box with a large majority of Clayton votes was stolen. Clayton was assassinated the following year while challenging the election, but was posthumously declared the winner. ^[220] In Maryland, Barnes Compton was initially elected, but his opponent Sydney E. Mudd successfully contested the election the following year. ^[221]

Evidence suggests that the 1892 Alabama gubernatorial election, where Reuben Kolb lost to incumbent Thomas Goode Jones, was decided by fraud. This included ballot boxes being stolen, votes being swayed by bribery or threats, and counties in the Black Belt announcing results before later changing them. Kolb was not allowed by law to contest the results, and lost the gubernatorial race in 1894 under similar circumstances. ^[222]

20th century

Electoral fraud caused some notable United States elections in the 20th century to be affected or annulled. Since 1913, four United States Senate races were overturned by the Senate after the losing candidate challenged the outcome. ^[223] In the early 20th century, electoral fraud was similar in nature to the 19th century. ^[9] Alabama ratified its 1901 constitution, which remained in effect until 2022, due to widespread electoral fraud in the referendum. ^{[224] [225]} In the 1905 New York City mayoral election, there was fraud against William Randolph Hearst linked to the Tammany Hall machine. Hearst lost to George McClellan by 3,472 votes. ^[226] In the 1918 United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, Patrick McLane was declared the winner in the 10th district; a congressional committee determined in 1921 that "wholesale fraud" had cheated John R. Farr out of the election, and McLane was unseated. ^[227] In the 1930s, Huey Long ran a political machine throughout Louisiana with significant voter fraud. ^[228] Indications of electoral fraud in the 1930 United States Senate election in Louisiana, which Long won, were ubiquitous. According to Long biographer Richard White, "the official record indicated that voters marched to the polls in alphabetical order". ^[229] In the 1932 United States Senate election in Louisiana, Long's lieutenants allegedly promised the families of inmates that their loved ones would be freed if they voted for Long's endorsed candidate. ^[228]

1948 Texas U.S. Senate Democratic primary runoff results, with Johnson counties in blue, and Stevenson counties in green.

In the 1948 United States Senate election in Texas, according to a 1990 book by historian Robert A. Caro, Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson won his primary against Coke R. Stevenson due to electoral fraud, which included county officials casting ballots for absent voters and changing vote tally numbers. Johnson won the primary by 87 votes, and the Texas Democratic Party executive committee upheld his victory by a vote of 29 to 28. The event became known as the Box 13 scandal, as six days after polls had closed, 202 additional votes were added to the totals for Precinct 13 of Jim Wells County: 200 for Johnson and two for Stevenson. ^{[40] [231] [232]}

Some historians believe the 1960 United States presidential election in Illinois, which John F. Kennedy won over Richard Nixon, was decided by fraud. Multiple judges and one independent prosecutor determined that the election was fair, although historian Robert Dallek, who wrote biographies on both candidates, concluded the Chicago machine run by mayor Richard J. Daley "probably stole Illinois from Nixon". According to Politico in 2016, "over a half century after the fact, it's impossible to judge what really happened." Nixon lost the Electoral College and conceded the election the following morning, although he encouraged recount efforts in Illinois and other states, which were shut down after setbacks in several key court hearings. ^{[233] [234]} Between 1968 and 1984, eight Democratic primary elections in Brooklyn, New York, were marked by repeated fraud according to the findings of a grand jury. The fraud included multiple voting by teams of political workers with fake voter registration cards. ^{[235] [236]}

U.S. Attorney Dan K. Webb prosecuted voter fraud in the 1982 Illinois elections.

In the 1982 Illinois elections, there were 62 indictments and 58 convictions for election fraud, many involving precinct captains and election officials. A grand jury concluded that 100,000 fraudulent votes had been cast in Chicago. Authorities found fraud involving vote buying and ballots cast by others in the names of registered voters. ^[237] The case was prosecuted in November 1982 by U.S. Attorney Dan K. Webb. ^{[238] [239]} In the 1987 Chicago mayoral election, two reviews conducted by the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners and an election watchdog group headed by Webb found that tens of thousands of ballots were fraudulently cast in the Democratic primary. ^{[240] [241] [242]} In the 1994 Pennsylvania State Senate election, a federal judge invalidated a race in Philadelphia after finding that the Democratic candidate William G. Stinson had stolen the election through absentee ballot fraud. Republicans took control of the State Senate as a result of the ruling. ^[243]

In the 1996 United States House of Representatives elections in California, the Republican majority on the House Oversight Committee claimed to have found 748 illegal votes cast in the 46th district race between Republican Bob Dornan and Democrat Loretta Sanchez, including 624 by noncitizens. Sanchez won by 979 votes, so it would not have affected the outcome, ^{[244] [245] [162]} and the House voted to dismiss Dornan's challenge in February 1998. ^[246] The findings were highly contested ^[247] and disputed by the Democratic minority on the committee, who pointed out that about half of those who registered as noncitizens were citizens by the time they cast their ballots. ^[246] No indictments were brought by a grand jury after a yearslong criminal investigation into Hermandad, an immigrant rights group at the center of fraud allegations. ^[246] The California Secretary of State did not press charges, concluding in April 1998 that the noncitizens identified had registered in error and not from criminal intent. ^[246]

The 1997 Miami mayoral election is known for being one of the worst examples of electoral fraud in recent history, with a judge invalidating the result for "a pattern of fraudulent, intentional and criminal conduct" in the casting of absentee ballots. ^{[248] [249]} The neighboring city of Hialeah, Florida had its own mayoral contest overturned in 1993, when a judge ruled that so many ballots had been cast from a retirement home housing schizophrenics and drug addicts that the election had to be re-run. ^[250]

21st century

A vacant name plate in the U.S. House of Representatives during the 2018 North Carolina's 9th congressional district election fraud investigation.

In the 21st century, there have been scattered examples of electoral fraud affecting the outcome of elections, and attempts at widespread electoral fraud are notable when they occur at all. ^{[40] [251]} In 2002, 2004 and 2006, eight prominent Clay County, Kentucky politicians were involved in a scheme to gain control of the local board of elections and fix election outcomes. The group notably included a former U.S. circuit judge and former county school superintendent. ^{[192] [252]} In the 2003 East Chicago, Indiana mayoral election, the Indiana Supreme Court invalidated the Democratic primary citing "a widespread and pervasive pattern" of absentee ballot fraud. Forty-six people, mainly city workers, were found guilty in a wide-ranging conspiracy to purchase votes through the use of absentee ballots, which included the coercion of sick people and people with limited English skills. ^{[8] [253] [254]}

In 2009 and 2010, Massachusetts state representative Stephen Stat Smith illegally cast absentee ballots for voters who were ineligible or unaware of ballots being cast in their names. Smith pled guilty in 2012 and resigned his seat in 2013. ^{[255] [256]} In 2012, Indiana Secretary of State Charles P. White was convicted of multiple voter fraud-related charges, causing him to lose his position. ^{[257] [258]} In the 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in Florida, Jeffrey Garcia, chief of staff to 26th district incumbent Joe Garcia, was charged with orchestrating a scheme to illegally request nearly 2,000 absentee ballots. Garcia pled guilty to a misdemeanor. ^[250] In the 2012 Massachusetts House of Representatives elections, Republican candidate Enrico "Jack" Villamaino and his wife forged more than 280 voters' names on absentee ballot requests. ^[100] Also in 2012, Cincinnati, Ohio poll worker Melowese Richardson made national headlines for using her position to vote twice. ^{[259] [260]} In the 2014 and 2016 Philadelphia elections, former congressman Michael "Ozzie" Myers was found to have bribed election workers to stuff ballot boxes in local races. Myers pled guilty in 2022 and was sentenced to 2+1⁄2 years in prison. ^[261]

Bridgeport, Connecticut mayor Joe Ganim won re-election in 2024 after a primary invalidated for ballot stuffing.

One of the most notable recent cases of fraud occurred in the 2018 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina. The fraud involved a ballot harvesting scheme undertaken by McCrae Dowless, a campaign operative working for Republican congressional candidate Mark Harris in North Carolina's 9th congressional district. Mark Harris initially won the election by 905 votes, but multiple inconsistencies – only 19 percent of ballot requesters were registered Republicans, for example, but 61 percent of absentee voters selected Harris – and credible reports from workers hired by Dowless led to an investigation, refusal by the North Carolina State Board of Elections to certify Harris, a new election (in which Harris did not participate), and the arrest of Dowless and several other Republican party operatives for ballot harvesting and ballot tampering. ^{[262] [263] [264]}

In 2022, Southfield, Michigan poll worker Sherikia Hawkins pled no contest to misconduct after she was accused of covering up a failure to count 193 absentee ballots in 2018. ^{[265] [266]} In 2024, Kim Phuong Taylor, wife of Republican Iowa congressional candidate Jeremy Taylor, was convicted of 52 counts of voter fraud for illegally filling out or submitting voter registrations and absentee ballots in 2020. ^{[267] [268]} In the 2023–24 Bridgeport, Connecticut mayoral election, a judge ordered the Democratic primary to be re-run after ruling that there was enough evidence of ballot stuffing to throw the results into doubt. According to The New York Times, illegal ballot manipulation is not uncommon in Bridgeport elections, and has included apartment residents being pressured to apply for absentee ballots they were not entitled to. ^[22] Incumbent mayor Joseph Ganim, who had won the initial primary, also won the do-over primary and the general election. ^[269]

In October 2024, a Vigilantes Inc. documentary premiered on YouTube. ^[270] Renowned investigative journalist Greg Palast and his investigation team bring focus to voter suppression by “Vigilante” challenges by self-appointed vote-fraud hunters, not government officials, who are targeting well over one million people to challenge and block the counting of their ballots. Most suspiciously, the vast majority of vigilante targets are young voters and minorities. Currently, the Trump-sponsored group True the Vote has gone from 88 vigilantes to over 40,000 “volunteers” in 43 states. ^[271]

Public perception

A 2021 study found that Republicans and Democrats often define voter fraud differently, with Republicans more likely to define voter fraud as stemming from individual actions whereas Democrats are more likely to point to voter suppression from unfair policies. ^[272] A 2016 nationwide poll published in The Washington Post found that 84% of Republicans, 75% of independents and 52% of Democrats believed that a "meaningful amount" of fraud occurred in United States elections. ^[273] A June 2021 Texas Tribune /University of Texas poll found that 19% of Texas voters thought ineligible people "frequently" cast ballots. ^[274] A series of Monmouth polls conducted between 2020 and 2023 found that 29%–32% of Americans believed the 2020 United States presidential election was fraudulent. ^[275] A 2024 nationwide NPR/PBS News/Marist poll found 58% of Americans were concerned about voter fraud in the 2024 United States presidential election, including 88% of Donald Trump supporters and 29% of Kamala Harris supporters. ^[276] A July 2021 poll published by NPR found that more Americans were concerned about ensuring everyone who wanted to could vote (56%) than ensuring that nobody who is ineligible votes (41%). ^[277] 90% of Democrats said voting access was more important, and 75% of Republicans said stopping ineligible voting was more important. ^[277]

Research has shown that voters tend to be highly confident in how elections are conducted in their own communities, though are far less confident in the election processes of other states. A Colorado Secretary of State survey after the 2020 election found that 36% of Colorado voters lacked confidence in the national election results, while only 14% lacked confidence in the Colorado election results. ^[278] A January 2021 study by the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review found that a majority of Donald Trump supporters, particularly those who were more politically knowledgeable and more closely following election news, believed that electoral fraud was widespread. ^[279] A 2016 study published in State Politics & Policy Quarterly found that Republicans living in states with voter identification laws were on average more confident in their state's elections than Republicans who did not. However Democrats in states with voter identification laws were less confident in their elections than other Democrats. The study found that this dynamic "was polarized and conditioned by party identification". ^[280] October 2020 polling by University of Miami professor Joseph Uscinski found that 70% of Republicans believed the 2020 presidential election would be rigged with mail-in ballots, but nearly the same number of Democrats believed the election would be rigged by their mail-in ballots not being delivered. ^[281]

According to Politico, many figures in the 2004 vote-fraud conspiracy movement, which claimed that the 2004 United States presidential election had been stolen from Democrat John Kerry, later believed the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump, despite the two being ideological opposites. ^[281] Flawed research is one factor that can widen a gap in perception that significant voter fraud has occurred between supporters of the candidate that lost an election and the supporters of a candidate that won. ^[282] Politicians are able to significantly influence citizens who support them on election policy issues, ^[283] as Donald Trump did in weakening trust in the American electoral system. ^[284] Matthew D. Taylor points to a study that shows 82% of Republican prophecy believers thought the election was stolen, compared to 40% of Republican non-prophecy believers as evidence that the New Apostolic Reformation and similar groups led by self-described Prophets have been especially influential in convincing their followers that the election was stolen. ^[285] He argues that many prophets in the movement preached that Trump was anointed by God and won the election before the votes had been counted helps to explain why members of charismatic Christian groups were also overrepresented at the Capitol on January 6. ^[285]

False and unproven claims

Main articles: Voter suppression in the United States and Election denial movement in the United States

History

False claims of electoral fraud have occurred numerous times in United States history, often with the intention of voter suppression. Exaggerated claims of noncitizen voter fraud date back to the 1800s and usually spike after periods of higher nonwhite immigration. ^[142] According to Harvard professor Alexander Keyssar, voter fraud allegations in the 19th century were usually made by conservative Protestants against newly arrived immigrants; and while there was more to justify fraud claims back then, they were often exaggerated and used to justify restrictive voting laws. ^[12] In 1807, New Jersey ended the rights of women to vote with the excuse that men were supposedly dressing as women and voting twice. In 1959, Washington Parish, Louisiana purged 85% of the parish's African American voters despite claiming they were only removing illegal names. ^[286]

Prominent Republicans such as presidential nominee Bob Dole in 1996, or Republican National Committee chair Ed Gillespie and George W. Bush campaign manager Marc Racicot in 2004, made unsubstantiated claims that voter fraud was occurring in favor of their opponents. ^[12] Fraud was notably alleged by losing candidates in the closely decided 2004 Washington gubernatorial election and 2008 United States Senate election in Minnesota but nothing that would account for either margin of victory was proven in court. ^{[287] [288] [289]} According to columnist Cathy Young, politicians of both parties have made "ill-advised, and sometimes entirely spurious" statements questioning the legitimacy of United States elections – notable Democratic examples include multiple prominent figures after the 2000 United States presidential election and Stacey Abrams in 2018 ^{[ undue weight? – discuss ]} – though she noted that Republican election denialism after 2020 was "in a vastly different league". ^[290]

2004 presidential election

Main article: 2004 United States election voting controversies

After the 2004 presidential election, many blogs published false rumors claiming to show evidence that voter fraud had prevented Democrat John Kerry from winning. ^{[291] [281]} Unfounded conspiracy theories about the election were circulated and promoted. ^[281] Proponents argued the election was stolen, arguing that votes were switched from Democratic to Republican, that "phantom voters" voted in Ohio, that exit polls that favored Kerry were "more accurate" than the actual result, ^[292] and that voting machines were rigged to favor Republican George W. Bush. ^[293] As a result of this, some Democratic members of Congress asked for investigations into the vote count. ^[292] A 2005 report by Democratic House Judiciary Committee ranking member John Conyers titled What Went Wrong in Ohio claimed that "numerous serious election irregularities" and voter suppression by Republicans had caused Bush to win the state. ^{[206] [294]} While some courts before the election found that certain restrictive voting policies of Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell were illegal, ^[295] claims of voter and machine fraud swaying the election have not achieved mainstream acceptance, ^[281] and several have been refuted. ^[296]

Claims by Donald Trump

See also: False or misleading statements by Donald Trump and Big lie § Donald Trump's lies of a stolen election

2016 presidential election

Main article: Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign § Uncertainty over accepting the election results

President Donald Trump continued to claim without evidence that between 3 and 5 million people cost him the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by voting illegally. ^{[297] [298] [299] [300] [301]}

Voter fraud commission (2017)

Main article: Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

President Trump signing the Executive Order establishing the Voter Fraud Commission

On May 11, 2017, Trump signed an executive order to establish a commission to conduct an investigation into voter fraud, chaired by Vice President Mike Pence with Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach as vice chair. ^[302] Kobach and the commission failed to provide evidence for claims of voter fraud by Trump and others on the commission. ^[303] Trump's creation of the commission was criticized by voting rights advocates, scholars and experts, and newspaper editorial boards as a pretext for, and prelude to, voter suppression. ^{[304] [305] [306] [307] [303]} Matt Dunlap, a Democrat on the commission, called it a sham designed to gin up anti-immigrant sentiment. ^[14] In January 2018, Trump abruptly disbanded the commission, ^[308] which met only twice. ^[309] The commission found no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the United States. ^{[308] [309]} Richard Hasen said the commission was supposed to give Trump cover to pass a national documentary proof of citizenship law. ^[167]

2020 presidential election

See also: Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election, Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election, and Republican efforts to restrict voting following the 2020 presidential election

During the 2020 presidential campaign, Trump indicated in Twitter posts, interviews and speeches that he might refuse to recognize the outcome of the election if he were defeated; Trump falsely suggested that the election would be rigged against him. ^{[310] [311] [312]} Trump repeatedly claimed that "the only way" he could lose would be if the election was "rigged" and repeatedly refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power after the election. ^{[313] [314]} Trump also attacked mail-in voting throughout the campaign, falsely claiming that the practice contained high rates of fraud. ^{[315] [316] [317]} In September 2020, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, a Trump appointee, testified under oath that the FBI has "not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it's by mail or otherwise." ^[318]

In the lead-up to the election, citing fraud concerns, Republicans filed lawsuits in several states seeking to limit the use of mail-in voting, ^[319] and prepared to challenge individual mail-in ballots. ^[320] Republican election lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg criticized his party for this in a November 1, 2020, Washington Post op-ed, writing that over the last four decades, "Republicans found only isolated instances of fraud", and that "Proof of systematic fraud has become the Loch Ness Monster of the Republican Party. People have spent a lot of time looking for it, but it doesn't exist". ^[20]

Trump claims of electoral fraud in the run-up to elections.

After most of the major news organizations declared Biden the President-elect on November 7, ^{[322] [323] [324] [325]} Trump refused to accept his loss, declaring "this election is far from over" and alleging election fraud without providing evidence. ^[326] Multiple lawsuits alleging electoral fraud were filed by the Trump campaign, all of which were dismissed as having no merit. ^{[327] [328]} Trump's claims of fraud during the 2020 election were also debunked by his own officials. ^[329] Republican officials questioned the legitimacy of the election and aired conspiracy theories regarding various types of alleged fraud. ^{[330] [331]} In early 2021 along with other elections laws though to give Republicans an advantage, Trump loyalists in a number of states initiated a push to make voting laws more restrictive. ^[332]

In December 2021, the Associated Press released a detailed fact-check which found fewer than 475 instances of voter fraud out of an estimated 25 million votes cast in the six battleground states. ^[333] They involved both Democrats and Republicans and were almost always caught before the votes were counted. ^{[334] [335] [336] [337]} While some seemed intentional, others involved clerical error or voter confusion. ^[334] In October 2024, prosecutors in Trump's DOJ election subversion case argued that they would prove at trial that Trump invented statistics "from whole cloth". ^[338]

2024 presidential election

See also: Republican Party efforts to disrupt the 2024 United States presidential election

Trump's claims of fraud have continued into the 2024 presidential campaign, with experts and election officials have voiced concern about rising threats and violence inspired by Trump's election denialism since 2020. ^{[329] [339]} Richard Hasen wrote that in January 2024 that, "Trump has been able to manufacture doubt out of absolutely nothing; fraud claims untethered to reality still captivate millions of people looking for an excuse as to why their adored candidate may have lost." ^[340] Walter Olson of the Cato Institute said that Trump's agitations about election security and noncitizen voting are due to "his need to keep up the illusion that he somehow won". ^[341]

In the 2024 New Hampshire Republican presidential primary, Trump repeated false claims that from other states voted in the primary. ^[342] According to The New York Times, Trump escalated use of "rigged election" and "election interference" statements in advance of the 2024 election compared to the previous two elections. The statements were described as part of a "heads I win; tails you cheated" rhetorical strategy. ^[321] The escalating rhetoric worries experts concerned about another attempt to overturn the results of the election, as well as threats and violence. ^{[134] [343]} An August 2024 poll found that 17% of Americans are not prepared to accept the outcome of the 2024 election and that two-thirds of Americans do not believe Trump is prepared to accept the outcome. ^[344] 34% of survey respondents lack confidence that votes will be tallied correctly. ^[344] Matt Gertz of Media Matters argues that this level of support is due to the bifurcated media environment, which makes his plans to overturn an election possible. ^[134] The Economist wrote that if he were to lose, Trump was "all but certain" to challenge the outcome again. ^[345] Chris LaCivita, an adviser to Trump, said in July, "It's not over on Election Day, it's over on Inauguration Day." ^[345]

In 2024, the Republican National Committee (RNC) launched a swing state initiative to mobilize thousands of poll watchers, poll workers and attorneys to observe the election process. The RNC also created hotlines for poll watchers to report perceived problems and escalate issues through legal action. ^[346] Critics have argued that these efforts could undermine trust in elections and are targeted on polling places where more Democrats cast their ballots. ^[347] The 2024 election also saw an increase in volunteers recruited by nonpartisan voter advocacy groups to assist poll workers and voters. ^[347] The Democracy Defense Project launched a bipartisan effort to counter narratives of voter fraud in swing states and Ohio. ^[348] Misinformation and false claims about noncitizen voting have become the main focus of election denialism ahead of the 2024 election, which some experts say have been used to intimidate and suppress voters while laying the groundwork to try and overturn the election again should Trump lose. ^[349]

Vote flipping on touch screens

Claims of vote flipping or vote switching by voting touch screens have consistently been refuted by election experts. They have resurfaced in every national election since 2004, reaching a peak in the 2020 election, after which the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a statement, "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised." ^[350] With the widespread adoption of direct recording electronic (DRE) touch screen voting technology in the early 2000s, largely funded by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, claims began to surface that votes for one candidate were being "flipped" to the opposing candidate. As the 2004 general election was the first national election since HAVA, it was the first to see this allegation as some Democratic voters in Florida claimed the touch screen changed their vote for John Kerry to a vote for George W. Bush. ^[351]

CBS News election law contributor David Becker stated that voter error is the cause of every incident he has encountered of an allegedly "flipped" vote. ^[352] As of November 5, 2024, incidents in the 2024 election have tended to support this assertion. In Georgia, a single voter in Whitfield County selected the wrong candidate during early voting, spotted the error on the paper ballot and corrected her mistake—a human error that quickly became a conspiracy theory after an anonymous Facebook post was shared by Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. ^{[352] [353]} After one voter in Tarrant County, Texas claimed his vote for president had been switched by the machine, county commissioner Alisa Simmons said, "There is zero evidence that that has occurred," suggesting voter error was responsible. ^[354] On the last day of early voting in Texas, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick tweeted that "There have been less than ten allegations of vote flipping out of nearly 7 million votes cast across the state. There has not been a single confirmation that it actually happened." ^[355]

Misinformation and disinformation

See also: Election denial movement in the United States § Analysis

Sciences Po academic Jérôme Viala-Gaudefroy suggests that right-wing politicians and organizations promote the narrative of electoral fraud out of political or financial self-interest that taps into political paranoia that he traces to McCarthyism, the Great Replacement, and the deep state. ^{[356] [357]} Jon Schwarz of The Intercept lists examples of false voter fraud claims from Republicans going back decades. ^[358] Mindy Romero of the University of South Carolina said the concern of noncitizens voting is fueled by misinformation, fear and demonization of immigrants. ^[359] Voter fraud expert Lorraine Minnite has described Republicans as seizing on misunderstandings of complicated processes around voter roll maintenance to suggest that noncitizens were voting. ^[116] Some claims of voter fraud are described as a dog whistle. ^{[360] [361] [362] [363] [364]}

By 2023, Meta, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter) rolled back efforts to label or remove lies about election fraud. ^{[365] [366]} As of September 2024, the Heritage Foundation, among other groups, were spreading election misinformation about noncitizen voting, with one debunked video getting over 56 million views on X. ^[367] Since the 2020 election, over $590 million from mostly anonymous donors went to groups in the Only Citizens Vote Coalition which promotes election misinformation. The groups involved also support other projects like Project 2025 and many are overseen by major players who tried to overturn the 2020 election. ^[368]

By foreign actors

See also: Foreign interference in the 2024 United States elections, Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections, and Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections

Russian operatives have promoted false claims of voter fraud hoping to "further sow doubt in election integrity" ^[369] in the United States and democracies around the world. ^[370] According to a U.S. intelligence report in September 2020, Russian intelligence operatives were trying to amplify concerns of United States election integrity such as the reliability of mail-in voting. ^[371] According to The New York Times, disinformation efforts by autocratic countries led by Russia and China "push narratives undermining democratic governance" designed to "accelerate the recent rise in authoritarian-minded leaders". ^[365] Russia's Internet Research Agency focused voter fraud memes at right-wing groups, with its most-shared Facebook post of the 2016 United States elections reading "Like if you think only US citizens should be allowed vote" while showing a photo of Latinos waiting in line. ^[372]

Relationship to other election issues

See also: Democratic backsliding in the United States

Attempts to overturn election results

See also: Independent state legislature theory

In some cases, the spreading of fraud claims is done to lay the groundwork for overturning election results. ^{[373] [374] [375]} The 2020 presidential election saw a number of failed attempts to overturn the results based on unfounded claims of voter fraud. ^{[376] [377]} The 2024 presidential election has seen similar claims, which some experts have warned could be seeds planted in case Trump loses and tries to overturn the result. ^{[378] [379] [134]} The New York Times observed that Georgia was the most likely state for this to occur due to recent changes in election laws. ^{[379] [345]}

Confidence in elections

False claims of fraud have lowered overall levels of trust in elections. ^[380] According to The New York Times, "baseless claims of electoral fraud have battered trust in democracy". ^[365] For the 2024 elections, Rick Hasen was most worried about election denialism which can lead to violence and erode trust in democracy. ^[381] A nationwide study conducted after the 2018 United States elections and published in the Journal of Experimental Political Science found that exposure to claims of voter fraud reduces confidence in electoral integrity, though does not reduce support for democracy itself. Corrective messages from mainstream sources did not measurably reduce this distrust. ^[382]

Political violence and threats

See also: Stochastic terrorism and Brooks Brothers riot

The combination of false claims about electoral fraud and violent, warlike rhetoric has been noted to raise the likelihood of election workers receiving threats, as well as political violence such as the unprecedented January 6 attacks. ^{[383] [342] [376] [384]} Some election experts worry that Trump's voters would resort to violence again in 2024 if he lost the election. ^{[385] [121]} In September, Trump threatened to jail people "involved in unscrupulous behavior" in the 2024 election, prompting widespread condemnation from election officials that it could provoke violence, including against election workers. ^{[386] [339]}

A 2024 Brennan Center survey found 4 in 10 election workers had experienced threats, harassment or abuse. ^[373] In some cases where poll workers were intimidated by poll watchers in 2020, ^[347] they were given additional protections for subsequent elections, including the electronic screening of poll watchers and a greater distance from them, ^[347] panic buttons, ^[345] bulletproof glass and now get extensive training on de-escalation and active shooter scenarios. ^[387] Election offices between September 2023 and 2024 have also received white powder in envelopes and one in Ohio had its window shot. ^[387] The mailroom in Durham, North Carolina has been retrofitted with a separate exhaust to protect against hazardous substances sent in the mail. ^[387] Election officials in Georgia, Maine, Michigan and Missouri have also been swatted at their homes with bogus 911 calls. ^[387] Jena Griswold said she had received more than 1,000 serious threats in the past year, which she credits to the rhetoric of former president Trump. ^[388] The Department of Homeland Security issued warnings between July and September about right-wing election deniers possibly trying to bomb ballot drop boxes and commit other acts of terrorism, citing baseless 'perceptions of voter fraud' as the primary trigger they worry about with regard to motivations to commit violence by a lone wolf. ^[389]

Voter intimidation

See also: Electoral fraud § Intimidation

While voter intimidation has been relatively rare, it has increased since 2020 with the false claims of fraud and concerted efforts to recruit poll watchers. ^[390] In 2020, Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to go to the polls and "watch very carefully". ^[18] CNBC cited voter intimidation as a bigger concern for analysts than voter fraud ahead of the 2020 elections. ^[18] According to The Washington Post, voting rights advocates worry that the rhetoric about noncitizen voting could have a 'chilling effect' on Latino citizens and naturalized immigrants exercising their right to vote. ^[391] In Arizona in 2022, there were instances of people surveilling drop boxes and taking photos of people's license plates. ^[390] Some bills passed in Republican states also increase the likelihood of voter intimidation and election interference at polling stations. ^[392]

Voter suppression and turnout

Concerns about voter fraud, despite the fact that it is essentially nonexistent, are used as a main justification for voter suppression bills in the 21st century. ^[392] The bills passed by Republicans in state legislatures restrict voting access more for minorities, young people, and other Democratic-leaning constituencies. For example, sponsors of the bills often cite the false claim that Democrats had stolen the 2020 election through voter fraud. ^[392] Democrats and voting rights advocates argue that the Republican rhetoric around illegal voting is not a sincere effort to address voter fraud, but is designed to increase turnout of the Republican base (and suppress the turnout of Latino voters). ^[391] Rick Hasen believes that fraud messaging is aimed at the Republican base, noting how the rhetoric in court is more circumspect due to court rules. ^[393]

Prevention

States each have different laws and methods to address electoral fraud. Some methods of preventing voter fraud have caused controversy due to their potential to disproportionately impact legal voters and/or certain demographic groups. ^[394] A 2018 report released by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recommended that states undergo regular election audits, cross-check voter registrations nationwide for duplicates, and adopt systems for voters to verify receipt and delivery of mail ballots. The report called for investments to improve election technology and administration; including technology to prevent coercion or vote buying with mail ballots, and identity verification technology at the polls such as biometric markers. It also recommended the use of paper ballots and a ban on internet voting. ^[395]

Voter ID laws

Main article: Voter identification laws in the United States

In the United States, voter ID laws (laws requiring identification to vote) have been enacted in 36 states as of 2024 with the stated aim of preventing voter impersonation. ^[396] They have mostly been introduced by Republican legislators since 2011. ^{[397] [57] [61]} Specific forms of ID required vary between states, with some requiring photo identification. ^[398] Some laws have been struck down in court as an undue burden. ^[396] Voter ID requirements are generally popular among Americans, though they are also a divisive issue. ^{[399] [400]} Critics of voter ID laws have argued that they depress turnout by lawful voters under the pretense of addressing voter impersonation, which is quite rare. ^{[396] [61]} Americans who have lower incomes, are younger or transgender are less likely to have an updated ID. ^{[396] [401]}

Citizenship verification

See also: Voter identification laws in the United States § Existing processes to prevent noncitizen voting

Citizenship verification process in North Carolina as of 2017

The process of verifying the citizenship of voters varies by state. ^{[126] [129]} It is best practice for states to check registrations against DMV or Social Security files to check for noncitizens. ^[107] Some methods states have tried have been discontinued due to errors or legal fights. As of 2020, some states like Kansas do not independently verify proof of citizenship. ^{[126] [ needs update ]}

According to the North Carolina State Board of Elections in 2017, DMV data indicating noncitizenship is just the first step in determining someone's citizenship status because, "voters who appear to be non-citizens based on DMV data were confirmed to be U.S. citizens in the SAVE database 97.6 percent of the time." ^[402] If the status was then also listed as noncitizen in the Systematic Alien Verifications for Entitlements database, the Board asked for more proof in mailings and interviews since 3/4 of those who had been able to provide proof of citizenship, remained listed in the SAVE database as noncitizens. ^[402]

Georgia compares voter rolls to Social Security Administration and its Department of Driver Services, while Colorado uses the SAVE database as-needed. ^[403] In Georgia, if someone's citizenship cannot be verified who registers to vote, they are put into a 'pending citizenship' status and prevented from registering. ^[107] Texas requires court clerks to notify the secretary of state of those disqualified from jury duty for being noncitizens. ^[129]

In Nevada, the state DMV does not pass along citizenship information to counties when they make voter registration checks, meaning that noncitizen registration is technically possible if applicants lie on their registration form. ^[404] According to the Bipartisan Policy Center as of July 2024, access to federal citizenship data is "difficult, costly, and burdensome", and state election officials have "long struggled" to obtain it. Between January 2023 and July 2024, nine states instituted laws to solidify citizenship verification for voting and voter registration; mostly by improving data collaboration with state resources and federal databases. ^[405]

Proof of citizenship laws

Main article: Voter identification laws in the United States § Proof of citizenship laws

Lack of citizenship documentation by political party (2024)

Proof of citizenship laws require people who vote or register to vote to present documentary proof of citizenship. Proponents have argued that they are necessary to prevent illegal noncitizen voting, while critics have said that noncitizen voting essentially does not occur and that the laws would disenfranchise large percentages of eligible voters who lack easy access to such documents, such as college students, tribal voters, or low-income voters. ^{[408] [409] [406]} A June 2024 Brennan Center study estimates that 21.3 million citizens (9% of voters) do not have easy access to documentary proof of citizenship, and that 3.8 million citizens lack access to any form, often because documents were lost, damaged or stolen. ^{[410] [411] [412] [413] [406] [407]}

The legality of proof of citizenship laws has been disputed. In the 2013 Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. , the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Arizona's proof of citizenship law violated the 1993 National Voter Registration Act for federal elections. ^[414] In August 2024, in Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota the Supreme Court allowed Arizona to enforce a law requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote using the state's registration forms (federal forms do not require documentation), pending appeal. ^{[415] [416]} In July 2024, the United States House of Representatives passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would mandate that Americans show documentary proof of citizenship when registering to vote and make it easier to sue election workers who register a noncitizen. ^{[417] [418]} The bill died after not being considered by the Senate. ^[419] The Bipartisan Policy Center argued there are better ways to ensure noncitizens do not vote, such as better data sharing between state departments, such as data provided to a DMV when attaining a REAL ID. ^[405]

In the 2018 Fish v. Kobach case, U.S. District Court Judge Julie Robinson ruled that Kansas' proof of citizenship law was unconstitutional, in part because the state did not demonstrate that any meaningful illegal noncitizen voting occurred and that 31,089 citizens without the right documentation had their voter registration cancelled or suspended. ^{[420] [421] [422] [423]} In a 2023 case in Arizona, U.S. District Judge Susan R. Bolton struck down the documentary proof of citizenship requirement along similar lines but upheld some provisions, citing as credible estimates of 2022 noncitizen voting rates by Jesse Richman, which other scholars have disputed. ^{[40] [424]}

Signature verification

Signature rejection thresholds by state (2023).

Further information: Postal voting in the United States § Signature verification process

Signature verification is carried out by a majority of states in order to prevent forged paper ballots. According to the Election Administration and Voting Survey, 27.5% of rejected absentee ballots in 2016, ^[425] and 15.8%, of rejected mail-in ballots in 2018, ^[426] were due to signature mismatches. Tossing ballots due to signature mismatches can depend on the method of signature verification used. ^[427]

As of 2024, 31 states conduct signature verification on returned absentee or mail-in ballots. Nine states do not conduct signature verification, but require the signature of either a witness, two witnesses, or a notary. Ten states and Washington, D.C., neither conduct signature verification nor require a witness signature. ^[428] Mississippi is the only state to both conduct signature verification and require a witness signature (in this case, a notary). ^[428] Four states (Arkansas, Georgia, Minnesota, and Ohio) additionally require either a copy of the voter's ID or a voter identification number. ^[428]

In 2024, in Mesa County, Colorado, signature verification successfully detected around a dozen mail ballots that were stolen and fraudulently submitted on behalf of other voters. Three of the ballots had been wrongly accepted and counted after they were flagged by the automated system, but subsequently reviewed and approved by an election judge. ^[102]

Experts have stated that disenfranchisement caused by mail-in ballots being discarded on technicalities, including non-matching or missing signatures, is a more pervasive problem than mail-in ballot fraud. ^{[429] [430]} Researchers at Protect Democracy found that "an explosion of misinformation" about how much cheating occurs among voters using mail-in ballots caused a spike in rejected signatures during the 2021 Georgia Senate runoffs compared to the 2020 presidential election. ^[374]

Marking ballots

Because it is standard procedure for ballots cast in-person to not contain identifying information about the voter, if an illegal in-person ballot is cast, it can be impossible to isolate it and prevent it from counting. ^[431] Some states mark ballots with identifying numbers in certain circumstances. For example, an election worker in Maine will write a number on a ballot only if it is challenged, ^[432] and election workers in North Carolina write identifying numbers on early in-person and mail-in ballots, which allows ballots to be retrieved and not counted if necessary. ^[433]

Election audits

Further information: Election audit § Current practices in election results auditing in the United States

As of 2024, 48 states conduct some type of post-election audit, which check if the equipment and procedures used to count votes worked properly, and detect discrepancies using a hand count of paper records. The two exceptions are Alabama and New Hampshire, both of which nonetheless piloted different audit types in 2022. The type and scope of audit significantly varies between states. ^[434]

Voter roll management

Voter roll management seeks to balance sometimes competing interests of ensuring accurate voter rolls, protecting voter privacy and not disenfranchising or creating undue burdens on voters. ^[119]

Voter roll purges

See also: Voter suppression in the United States § Purging of eligible voters from the rolls

Voter caging is the process of challenging the voter registration status of someone who is registered to vote. It often involves sending that person a postcard to the address on file and removing the voter if they do not respond within a certain time period. ^[435] The practice can be controversial with some civil rights groups successfully suing some states that target voters of a particular political party or race in such a way as to make it meaningfully impact election outcomes and voter's rights. ^[436]

Interstate databases

The Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck Program was a database established in 2005 and run by Kansas that compared voting records across multiple states to prevent double voting. At least 28 states opted into the program, but academics and several states found that it returned high rates of false positives that would disenfranchise legal voters. Some states left as a result. ^[437] In 2017, the program was put on hold after the Department of Homeland Security discovered security vulnerabilities. In 2019, the program was indefinitely suspended as part of a settlement of a class-action lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union. ^[438] Earlier in 2012, the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) was established with a goal of improving the accuracy of voter rolls through comparisons between states. ^[439] At its peak, 33 states and the District of Columbia were members. ^[440] Beginning in 2022, nine Republican-led states left ERIC. States cited complaints about governance issues, including that ERIC mailed newly eligible voters who had not yet registered ahead of federal elections, and that it had become subject to alleged partisan influence. ^{[441] [442]} ERIC was the subject of repeated false claims from allies of Donald Trump that it was a voter registration vehicle for Democrats. Several states that left ERIC subsequently created their own partnerships. ^{[439] [441] [442]}

Prosecution

In most states, a prosecutor must prove that an individual committed voter fraud intentionally or knowingly. In some states, however, any mistake on the part of a voter that leads to voting illegally can be grounds for prosecution. ^[443] An election crime becomes a federal crime if the ballot includes one or more federal candidates, an election official is involved, election workers are threatened, or the crime relates to fraudulent voter registration or noncitizen voting. The Federal Bureau of Investigation defines voter or ballot fraud as one of three broad categories of federal election crimes; the other two being campaign finance violations and civil rights violations, such as voter intimidation or suppression. ^[5]

According to TheNew York Times, prosecutions of voter fraud can lead to significantly varied outcomes depending on socioeconomic status and the state in which someone is being tried. Most violations "draw wrist-slaps", while some high-profile prosecutions have produced multiple-year jail terms. ^[177] Often, prosecutions net people who did not realize they were breaking the law. ^[177] Lorraine Minnite has argued that almost all cases of illegal voting are due to misunderstandings or administrative error, ^[23] which does not constitute fraud in states where intent is required. ^[444] Prosecutions are exceedingly rare; as of 2022, an average of one and a half people per state per year were charged with voter fraud. ^[177] Cases of voter fraud can be difficult to prove or prosecute, ^{[445] [446] [447]} depending on the type of fraud alleged. ^{[55] [56] [448]} According to Bob Hall, former director of Democracy North Carolina, political will is especially required to investigate more complicated electoral fraud schemes, and prosecutors are more inclined to pursue easier cases such as when someone illegally votes while on probation. ^[449]

Between 1970 and 2005, fewer than 40 people were convicted for illegal voting in Florida, and only two were sent to prison. The Tampa Bay Times attributed this to fraud largely being ignored by prosecutors "unless an election is questioned, someone complains or a voter is investigated on other charges". ^[450] Wisconsin Watch evaluated voter fraud cases from 2012-2022 and found about 0.0006% of votes cast were challenged by a district attorney, with a voter's probation status as the most common reason. ^[451] A 2022 investigation by KING-TV found that the likelihood of being charged for voter fraud in Washington state varied depending on the county; King County, with a voting population of 1.3 million, had charged 9 cases of voter fraud since 2007, while the much smaller Lewis County had charged 8 (at least 3 of which were dismissed). ^[452] King County tended to write warning letters for isolated cases, such as a partner who cast the ballot of a recently deceased spouse, and focus prosecutions on cases where a repeat offense was more likely, such as canvassing fraud. ^[452] The United States Department of Justice publishes Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses, a handbook for district election officers. The 2017 edition warns against launching public investigations, without approval granted for extraordinary cases, into alleged fraud before an election is over so as not to tip the election with the publicity generated by an unfinished investigation. ^{[453] [454]}

Standing in lawsuits

In the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, many courts ruled against plaintiffs in voter fraud lawsuits on the basis that they, as voters, lacked standing. According to University of Memphis law professor Steven Mulroy, who was critical of some court dismissals based on standing, election cases raise unique standing challenges as the asserted harms are often split between many people. ^[455] A novel type of vote dilution claim based on fraud has been employed by Republicans since 2020, and is based on the idea that election rules that make it too easy to cast fraudulent votes can dilute the strength of valid ones. ^[456] Claims of this nature were not successful in 2020 though have since received some success in federal district courts. ^[457]

References

1. "Voter fraud, voter suppression, and other election crimes". USAGov. March 19, 2024. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
2. "Comprehensive Database of U.S. Voter Fraud Uncovers No Evidence That Photo ID Is Needed". News21. August 12, 2012. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
3. Farivar, Masood (September 13, 2020). "How Widespread Is Voter Fraud in the US?". Voice of America. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
4. Simson, Gary J. (July 1, 2021). "Election Laws Disproportionately Disadvantaging Racial Minorities, and the Futility of Trying to Solve Today's Problems with Yesterday's Never Very Good Tools". Emory Law Journal. 7 (5): 1166. Retrieved October 18, 2024. ...they typically claim to be targeting voter fraud of one or another of four kinds: "in-person voter fraud, noncitizen voting, double voting, and voter registration rolls that are 'bloated' and contain ineligible voters who should be removed.
5. "Election Crimes". Federal Bureau of Investigation. September 17, 2024. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
6. "Voting by mail and absentee voting". MIT Election Lab. February 28, 2024. Retrieved October 16, 2024. As with all forms of voter fraud, documented instances of fraud related to VBM are rare. However, even many scholars who argue that fraud is generally rare agree that fraud with VBM voting seems to be more frequent than with in-person voting.
7. Groppe, Maureen (April 22, 2024). "Supreme Court declines challenge to vote-by-mail rules". USA TODAY. Retrieved October 15, 2024. Documented cases of voter fraud, including those related to voting by mail, are rare. But while uncommon, fraud seems to occur more often with mailed-in votes than with in-person voting, according to the MIT Election Data & Science Lab.
8. Kessler, Glenn (November 1, 2022). "Opinion: The truth about election fraud: It's rare". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2024. In the last half-century, there are only scattered examples of where election fraud appeared to have made a difference in the outcome. They often take place in races that attract relatively few voters and thus the impact of fraud could be greater.
9. Blakemore, Erin (November 11, 2020). "Voter fraud used to be rampant. Now it's an anomaly". National Geographic . Archived from the original on November 26, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
10. Shafer, Jack (October 21, 2008). "Relax, John McCain, stolen elections are as American as apple pie". Slate Magazine. Archived from the original on September 17, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024.
11. Mead, Walter Russell (January 1, 2006). "Deliver the Vote: A History of Election Fraud, an American Political Tradition – 1742-2004". Foreign Affairs. 85 (1). Archived from the original on May 22, 2023. Retrieved September 17, 2024.
12. Roth, Zachary (August 3, 2016). "Analysis: Trump Not the First to Claim Voter Fraud Will Rig Elections". NBC News. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
13. Edlin, Ruby; Norden, Lawrence; Garber, Andrew; Hasan, Shanze; Clapman, Alice; Panditharatne, Mekela (May 3, 2023). "The Election Deniers' Playbook for 2024". Brennan Center for Justice . Archived from the original on July 19, 2024. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
14. Sullivan, Andy; Ax, Joseph (September 9, 2020). "Despite Trump claims, voter fraud is extremely rare. Here is how U.S. states keep it that way". Reuters . Experts say election fraud is vanishingly rare in the United States...Like other forms of voter fraud, double voting appears to be exceptionally rare, according to multiple studies.
15. Gardner, Amy; Itkowitz, Colby; Alfaro, Mariana (September 9, 2024). "Trump pledges to jail opponents, baselessly suggests election will be stolen from him". The Washington Post . ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 9, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
16. "Re-examining how and why voter fraud is exceedingly rare in the U.S. ahead of the 2022 midterms". Reuters . June 2, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2024. This article aims to provide information and context on how voter fraud in the U.S. is not a 'widespread' issue, as some online commentators claim, but made exceedingly rare by existing safeguards.
17. "G.O.P. Concocts Fake Threat: Voter Fraud by Undocumented Immigrants". The New York Times . April 28, 2022. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. Voter fraud is exceptionally rare, and allegations that widespread numbers of undocumented immigrants are voting have been repeatedly discredited.
18. Baldwin, Shawn (October 28, 2020). "Half of registered voters expect to have some difficulty voting, according to the Pew Research Center". CNBC . Retrieved September 4, 2024. While most experts agree voter fraud on a national scale is unlikely, a bigger concern for the 2020 elections, according to analysts, is voter intimidation.
19. Walsh, Joe (September 30, 2020). "Trump Bizarrely Claimed West Virginia Mailmen Are 'Selling' Ballots. They're Not". Forbes . Archived from the original on September 18, 2024. Retrieved September 4, 2024. Most experts say there is almost no evidence of systemic voter fraud in the United States, even in states where most people vote by mail.
20. Ginsberg, Benjamin L. "Opinion | My party is destroying itself on the altar of Trump". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 28, 2020. Retrieved November 2, 2020. Proof of systematic fraud has become the Loch Ness Monster of the Republican Party. People have spent a lot of time looking for it, but it doesn't exist
21. An anomaly ^[9] Vanishingly rare ^[14] Exceedingly rare ^{[15] [16]} Exceptionally rare ^[17] Unlikely, bigger concern voter intimidation ^[18] almost no evidence of systemic fraud, even by mail ^[19] doesn't exist ^[20]
22. "Election Fraud Is Rare. Except, Maybe, in Bridgeport, Conn". The New York Times . January 21, 2024. Archived from the original on July 20, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2024. ...though experts say election fraud is rare in the United States and often accidental when it occurs.
23. Huseman, Jessica (June 19, 2018). "How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested – and Utterly Failed". ProPublica . Retrieved September 8, 2024. Late in the trial, the ACLU presented Lorraine Minnite, a professor at Rutgers who has written extensively about voter fraud, as a rebuttal witness. Her book, 'The Myth of Voter Fraud,' concluded that almost all instances of illegal votes can be chalked up to misunderstandings and administrative error.
24. Fessler, Pam (May 15, 2020). "'It's Partly On Me': GOP Official Says Fraud Warnings Hamper Vote-By-Mail Push". NPR . Archived from the original on August 23, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2024. As many experts have said for years, Adams said instances of voter fraud are rare and more likely to be found in small, local races than in a statewide or national election.
25. "The Nonexistent Link Between Mailed Ballots and Voter Fraud". Governing. April 25, 2024. Archived from the original on September 18, 2024. Retrieved September 4, 2024. What the researchers did find, however, was that illegal voting was most prevalent in local races, where a small number of votes could alter the outcome. In other words, in the few instances where illegal voting happened, it was not in a presidential election – the contest that has been the focus of the attacks on mail voting by Trump's base.
26. Fahrenthold, David A. (October 2, 2012). "Selling votes is common type of election fraud". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on November 14, 2020. Retrieved September 4, 2024. In the past three years, six legal cases have laid out, step by step, ways that elections can be stolen. All involved local races, for positions such as magistrate, county clerk, mayor and state representative.
27. Udani, Adriano; Kimball, David C.; Fogarty, Brian (2018). "How Local Media Coverage of Voter Fraud Influences Partisan Perceptions in the United States" (PDF). State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 18 (2): 193–210. doi:10.1177/1532440018766907. ISSN   1532-4400. Extant findings show that voter fraud is extremely rare and difficult to prove in the United States.
28. Walentik, Steve (February 5, 2017). "UMSL political scientists share results of research into belief in voter fraud in Washington Post analysis". UMSL Daily. Retrieved October 25, 2024. They cite peer-reviewed studies that have shown that "voter fraud is extremely rare and difficult to prove," yet a portion of the public still holds fast to the notion Trump is pushing that voter fraud is rampant in American elections.
29. Lockhart, P.R. (April 26, 2019). "GOP-led states move the war on voting to a new front: voter registration". Vox. Retrieved October 25, 2024. However, voter fraud is difficult to prove and, according to the available evidence and academic studies, exceedingly rare.
30. Pradelli, Chad; Mettendorf, Cheryl (November 10, 2020). "Experts say voter fraud is extremely rare, here's why". ABC7 Los Angeles. Retrieved October 25, 2024. Stretton also said voter fraud is extremely rare, and difficult to prove. "Because oftentimes there is no paper trail, and there really isn't that much election fraud," he said.
31. ^{[27] [28] [29] [30]}
32. Goel, Sharad; Meredith, Marc; Morse, Michael; Rothschild, David; Shirani-Mehr, Houshmand (2020). "One Person, One Vote: Estimating the Prevalence of Double Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections" (PDF). American Political Science Review. 114 (2): 456–469. doi:10.1017/S000305541900087X. ISSN   0003-0554. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024. Voter fraud may be difficult to detect when it is done well (Ahlquist, Mayer, and Jackman 2014; Christensen and Schultz 2013) ... Removing the registration with an earlier registration date when two share the same name and birthdate – could impede approximately 300 legitimate votes for each double vote prevented...We estimate that at most only 1 in 4,000 votes cast in 2012 were double votes, with measurement error in turnout records possibly explaining a significant portion, if not all, of this.
33. "Dead people don't vote: Study points to an 'extremely rare' fraud". Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR). October 28, 2020. Retrieved September 7, 2024. While election chicanery can be hard to prove, instances of impersonating a dead person are easier to catch, Hall says.
34. Gabriel, Trip (September 2, 2020). "This Is Democrats' Doomsday Scenario for Election Night". The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2024. Elections experts say that absentee or mail voting is potentially more subject to instances of fraud than in-person voting, but that states with a history of all-mail voting have a minuscule number of cases. Wide-scale cheating that could swing a close race would be easy to detect.
35. Ng, Alfred (November 4, 2020). "Mail-in voting fraud is nearly impossible to commit". CNET. Retrieved October 25, 2024. Across the board, election security experts have pointed out just how difficult it would be to carry out election fraud on a scale large enough to actually affect the outcome.
36. "News21 election fraud analysis: About the investigation". The Washington Post . August 12, 2012. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
37. Lopez, German (November 12, 2018). "The Florida voter fraud allegations, explained". Vox. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
38. Carson, Corbin (August 12, 2012). "Election Fraud in America". votingrights.news21.com. Archived from the original on June 5, 2020. Retrieved September 18, 2024.
39. Beall, Pat (October 20, 2020). "We analyzed a conservative foundation's catalog of absentee ballot fraud: It's not a 2020 election threat". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on September 16, 2024. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
40. Kessler, Glenn (March 6, 2024). "Analysis: The truth about noncitizen voting in federal elections". Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 13, 2024. Retrieved April 21, 2024. There is scattered evidence of noncitizens voting in federal elections – sometime by mistake (such as erroneously thinking they were eligible while getting a driver's license) but also with nefarious intent ... Given the paucity of evidence of noncitizen voting, many election researchers have long said that there was little to support the idea that noncitizen voting had ever affected the outcome of a major election. But that does not necessarily prove that the phenomenon does not happen.
41. "Voter Fraud Map: Election Fraud Database". The Heritage Foundation. December 12, 2023. Archived from the original on October 5, 2020. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
42. "Widespread election fraud claims by Republicans don't match the evidence". Brookings Institution . November 22, 2023. Archived from the original on September 16, 2024. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
43. Joffe-Block, Jude (October 12, 2024). "6 facts about false noncitizen voting claims and the election". NPR. Retrieved October 16, 2024. Heritage has said the database is just a sampling of fraud cases and is not comprehensive.
44. Specht, Paul. "Is voter ID necessary? Impersonation is rare". @politifact. Archived from the original on April 7, 2021. Retrieved September 10, 2024. However, those cases make up such a small fraction of the ballots cast that experts consider the problem to be 'virtually nonexistent.'
45. Millhiser, Ian (April 15, 2020). "Kentucky just made it harder to vote during a pandemic". Vox. Archived from the original on July 10, 2024. Retrieved September 10, 2024. Although voter ID's policy proponents often argue that the measure is necessary to combat voter fraud at the polls, such fraud is so rare that it is virtually nonexistent.
46. Tomsic, Michael (September 7, 2016). "Despite Court Ruling, Voting Rights Fight Continues In North Carolina". NPR. Archived from the original on April 20, 2018. Retrieved May 14, 2017. Nationwide, voter fraud is also very rare. A law professor at the Loyola Law School in Los Angeles tracks claims of voter fraud. Of the more than 1 billion votes studied, he found only 31 credible cases of fraud. Despite the minimal risk, several other states have adopted stricter voting laws in recent years. A federal appeals court also struck down a voter ID requirement in Texas last month.
47. Liptak, Adam (March 23, 2015). "Wisconsin Decides Not to Enforce Voter ID Law". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 29, 2017. Retrieved May 14, 2017. The state said the law was needed to combat voter fraud. But cases of impersonation at the polls are very rare.
48. Selby, W. Gardner (March 17, 2016). ""The fact is voter fraud is rampant.": Light a match to Greg Abbott's ridiculous claim about 'rampant voter fraud'". PolitiFact. Retrieved August 3, 2016. Best we can tell, in-person voter fraud--the kind targeted by the ID law--remains extremely rare, which makes this claim incorrect and ridiculous.
49. Farley, Robert (October 19, 2016). "Trump's Bogus Voter Fraud Claims". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on October 27, 2021. Retrieved May 14, 2017. But is there? Many election experts say the kind of voter fraud Trump is talking about – voter impersonation – is extremely rare, and not enough to tip even a close presidential election. And there is plenty of research to back that up.
50. Ali Vitali; Peter Alexander; Kelly O'Donnell (May 11, 2017). "Trump establishes vote fraud commission". CNBC. Archived from the original on August 2, 2017. Retrieved May 14, 2017. The evidence that does exist, however, shows that voter fraud is extremely rare and that three million undocumented immigrants didn't vote in the 2016 election.
51. Jill Colvin (October 18, 2016). "Trump wrongly insists voter fraud is 'very, very common'; Donald Trump is insisting voter fraud does, indeed, pose a significant threat to the integrity of the U.S. electoral system". U.S. News & World Report. Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 20, 2016. Retrieved April 6, 2020. Most experts say voter fraud is extremely rare in the U.S., with one study by a Loyola Law School professor finding just 31 known cases of impersonation fraud out of 1 billion votes cast in U.S. elections between 2000 and 2014.
52. "Debunking the Voter Fraud Myth" (PDF). Brennan Center. Retrieved June 22, 2021. But putting rhetoric aside to look at the facts makes clear that fraud by voters at the polls is vanishingly rare, and does not happen on a scale even close to that necessary to "rig" an election.
53. Virtually non-existant ^{[44] [45]} Very rare ^{[46] [47]} Extremely rare ^{[48] [49] [50] [51]} Vanishingly rare ^[52]
54. Spencer, Douglas M. (2023). "Response: Electoral Maintenance" (PDF). Boston University Law Review. 103 (7): 2209. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 20, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024. Perhaps more damning, at least fourteen elections have been invalidated or overturned by a court between 1978-2018 due to absentee ballot fraud while not a single election has been overturned due to voter impersonation fraud.
55. Kertscher, Tom (April 7, 2016). "Which happens more: People struck by lightning or people committing voter fraud by impersonation?". Politifact. Retrieved September 7, 2024. It's fair to say, however, that impersonation cases can be hard to count in that they are hard to prove – particularly when no photo ID requirement is in place and a voter can cast a ballot simply by stating the name of a registered voter.
56. Winton, Richard (August 18, 2020). "L.A. County man accused of voting in three elections as his dead mother". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on September 8, 2024. Retrieved September 8, 2024. Such voter fraud charges are rarely filed in L.A. County and often are hard to prove, but officials said Abutin's repeated pattern of voting using a long-deceased relative's ID raised alarm bells.
57. Bingham, Amy (September 12, 2012). "Voter Fraud: Non-Existent Problem or Election-Threatening Epidemic?". ABC News. Retrieved December 9, 2015.
58. Ahlquist, John S.; Mayer, Kenneth R.; Jackman, Simon (December 1, 2014). "Alien Abduction and Voter Impersonation in the 2012 U.S. General Election: Evidence from a Survey List Experiment". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 13 (4): 460–475. doi:10.1089/elj.2013.0231. Existing studies, relying mainly on documented criminal prosecutions and investigations of apparent irregularities, turn up very little evidence of fraud. Critics argue that this is unsurprising because casting fraudulent votes is easy and largely undetectable without strict photo ID requirements.
59. Chatelain, Ryan (July 15, 2021). "Debate over photo voter ID laws is enduring – and complex". Spectrum News NY1. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
60. Rousu, Matthew (September 3, 2014). "Opinion: Voter ID Would Protect Voter's Rights, Not Inhibit Them". Forbes. Archived from the original on September 7, 2014. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
61. Gilbert, Michael D. (September 5, 2014). "The Problem of Voter Fraud". Columbia Law Review. 115 (3): 739–75.Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-56; Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2014-15.
62. "Report: Voter impersonation a rarity". UPI. August 12, 2012. Archived from the original on February 7, 2016. Retrieved December 9, 2015.
63. Davis, Janel (September 19, 2012). "In-person voter fraud 'a very rare phenomenon'". Politifact. Retrieved December 9, 2015.
64. Hood, M. V.; Gillespie, William (March 2012). "They Just Do Not Vote Like They Used To: A Methodology to Empirically Assess Election Fraud". Social Science Quarterly . 93 (1): 76–94. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00837.x. After examining approximately 2.1 million votes cast during the 2006 general election in Georgia, we find no evidence that election fraud was committed under the auspices of deceased registrants.
65. Hearn, Rose Gill (December 2013). "New York City Department of Investigation Report on the New York City Board of Elections' Employment Practices, Operations, and Election Administration" (PDF). p. iii. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 18, 2024. Retrieved August 13, 2024.
66. Gould, Jessica (December 30, 2013). "Dead Man Voting: Report Finds Fraud Potential at NYC Board of Election". WNYC. Archived from the original on August 13, 2024. Retrieved August 13, 2024.
67. Reilly, Ryan (April 29, 2014). "In-Person Voter Fraud Is Virtually Nonexistent, Federal Judge Rules". The Huffington Post. Retrieved March 1, 2016.
68. Ahlquist, John S.; Mayer, Kenneth R.; Jackman, Simon (December 1, 2014). "Alien Abduction and Voter Impersonation in the 2012 U.S. General Election: Evidence from a Survey List Experiment". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 13 (4): 460–475. doi:10.1089/elj.2013.0231. We find no evidence of widespread voter impersonation, even in the states most contested in the presidential or statewide campaigns.
69. Farrell, Henry (May 11, 2017). "Trump's commission should investigate alien abductions, not voter fraud. There's as much survey evidence for both". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved September 6, 2024. Ahlquist, Mayer and Jackman's findings are unequivocal – "the notion that voter impersonation is a widespread behavior is totally contradicted by these data."
70. Bump, Philip (October 13, 2014). "The disconnect between voter ID laws and voter fraud". The Washington Post The Fix blog. Retrieved July 26, 2016.
71. Levitt, Justin (August 6, 2014). "Opinion: A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast". The Washington Post (Wonkblog). Archived from the original on January 14, 2016. Retrieved December 9, 2015.
72. Edge, Sami (August 21, 2016). "A review of key states with Voter ID laws found no voter impersonation fraud". Center for Public Integrity. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved November 28, 2016. Attorneys general in those states successfully prosecuted 38 cases, though other cases may have been litigated at the county level ... None of the cases prosecuted was for voter impersonation.
73. "US election 2024 updates: My presidency will not be a continuation of Biden's, Harris tells Fox". BBC News. Retrieved October 16, 2024. Republicans in the last election heavily criticised mail-in voting as being ripe with fraud. Numerous national and state-level studies have shown that although there have been isolated cases, electoral fraud is very rare.
74. Robertson, Lori; Kiely, Eugene; Farley, Robert (February 21, 2024). "Trump Repeats Many Claims in Fox News Town Hall". FactCheck.org. Retrieved October 16, 2024. While the instances of voter fraud via mail-in ballots are more common than in-person voting fraud, experts have told us the number of known cases is relatively small.
75. Hills, Sophie; Grier, Peter (May 17, 2024). "Many Americans don't trust mail-in voting. What can be done?". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved October 16, 2024. Overall, election-related fraud is 'very, very rare,' says Professor Morley. Yet experts generally agree that fraud related to mail-in voting is more frequent than in-person voting abuses.
76. Silver, Maayan (March 20, 2024). "The GOP is pushing early voting. How are Wisconsin voters responding?". WUWM 89.7 FM - Milwaukee's NPR. Retrieved October 16, 2024. While election experts say fraud in mail balloting is slightly more common than in in-person voting, NPR reports that it's still such a minuscule amount it's not statistically meaningful.
77. Swenson, Ali (October 14, 2022). "How are mail-in and absentee ballots verified?". AP News. Retrieved October 15, 2024. Despite widespread claims of mail-in and absentee ballot fraud, the reality is it's exceedingly rare.
78. Willis, Derek (May 2, 2020). "A Conservative Legal Group Significantly Miscalculated Data in a Report on Mail-In Voting". ProPublica. Retrieved October 15, 2024. Numerous academic studies have shown that cases of voter fraud are extremely rare, although they do occur, and that fraud in mail voting seems to occur more often than with in-person voting.
79. Steffen, Sarah (July 7, 2024). "How big is the risk of voter fraud in US elections?". DW. Retrieved October 15, 2024. Voter fraud related to ballots sent by mail or placed in drop boxes is extremely rare, writes the Brennan Center for Justice – 'so rare that multiple analyses have shown that is more likely that someone will be struck by lightning that than commit mail ballot fraud.'
    'Mail-in ballots have been around for a long time and are a safe and secure way to vote "used by voters of all political parties,' says the Bipartisan Policy Center.
80. Banner, Alexandra (September 20, 2024). "5 things to know for Sept. 20: Middle East, Stock market, Political scandal, Mail-in voting, Covid-19 origins". CNN. Retrieved October 15, 2024. His comments came after a bipartisan group of election officials raised concerns about the delivery of mail-in ballots and as Trump resurrects debunked false claims about supposed fraud with mail-in voting. Voter fraud is extremely rare in US elections, according to studies from liberal and conservative groups.
81. Mulder, Brandon (August 6, 2021). "Among the rare cases of voter fraud in Texas, mail-in ballot fraud is most common". @politifact. Retrieved October 15, 2024. About 58% of voter fraud cases since 2005 [in Texas] involve mail-in ballot fraud. But the total number of prosecutions are minuscule compared to the tens of millions of votes cast in the last 15 years.
82. Viebeck, Elise (June 8, 2020). "Minuscule number of potentially fraudulent ballots in states with universal mail voting undercuts Trump claims about election risks". Washington Post.
83. Swan, Betsy Woodruff (March 18, 2022). "Under Trump, DHS directed to probe bogus claims about voter fraud". Politico. 'What makes this inappropriate is that the underlying activity is a fantasy,' said Ben Wittes, a senior fellow in Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution
84. Farley, Robert (April 10, 2020). "Trump's Latest Voter Fraud Misinformation". FactCheck.org . Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
85. Isolated cases, very rare ^[73]
    More common than in-person, # cases relatively small ^[74]

    'Very, very rare' + more frequent than in-person ^[75]

    While slighly more common than in-person, it's a minuscule amount ^[76]

    Rare + seems to occur more often than in-person ^[7]

    Exceedingly rare ^[77]

    Extremely rare, seems to occur more often than in-person ^[78]

    Extremely rare ^{[79] [80]} 58% of Texas prosecutions but still minuscule ^[81]

    Minuscule ^[82]

    Widespread voter fraud described as a 'fantasy' ^[83]

    Experts say more common, but still rare ^[84]
86. Foley, Edward B. "Why Vote-by-Mail Could be a Legal Nightmare in November". Archived from the original on August 5, 2021. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
87. Liptak, Adam (October 7, 2012). "As More Vote by Mail, Faulty Ballots Could Impact Elections". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
88. Morgan, Billy (July 6, 2020). "Why fears about voting by mail are unfounded". University of Chicago News. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
89. Carson, Corbin (August 12, 2012). "Who Can Vote? – A News21 2012 National Project". News21 . Archived from the original on June 5, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
90. Kahn, Natasha and Corbin Carson. "Investigation: election day fraud "virtually nonexistent"". Philadelphia Inquirer . Archived from the original on June 15, 2020. Retrieved June 15, 2020.
91. Young, Ashley (September 23, 2016). "A Complete Guide To Early And Absentee Voting". NPR. Archived from the original on December 1, 2020. Retrieved June 15, 2020.
92. Charles Stewart III; Amber McReynolds (April 28, 2020). "Let's put the vote-by-mail 'fraud' myth to rest". The Hill. Archived from the original on July 15, 2020. Retrieved September 3, 2024– via MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences.
93. Viebeck, Elise (June 8, 2020). "Minuscule number of potentially fraudulent ballots in states with universal mail voting undercuts Trump claims about election risks". Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 27, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
94. Huey-Burns, Caitlyn; Bidar, Musadiq (September 1, 2020). "What is ballot harvesting, where is it allowed and should you hand your ballot to a stranger?". CBS News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
95. Christie, Bob (June 1, 2022). "Records show coordinated Arizona ballot collection scheme". AP News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
96. Wendling, Mike (January 21, 2024). "Trump helped a vote scandal go viral. What really happened?". BBC Home. Archived from the original on September 10, 2024. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
97. Journal, Glenn R. Simpson and Evan Perez (December 19, 2000). "'Brokers' Exploit Absentee Voters; Elderly Are Top Targets for Fraud". The Wall Street Journal . ISSN   0099-9660. Archived from the original on June 12, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
98. Bender, William. "Nursing home resident's son: 'That's voter fraud'". Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on June 13, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
99. Olson, Walter (May 12, 2022). "The Trouble With Ballot Harvesting". Cato Institute. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2024. That last point highlights one of the first problems with the practice: the person standing there asking you to hand over your ballot may be someone you have a hard time saying no to, owing to dependence, economic or otherwise.
100. "Ex-selectman pleads guilty to 2012 election fraud". AP News. August 6, 2013. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
101. Mazzei, Patricia (October 20, 2013). "Ex-aide to Miami Rep. Joe Garcia to head to jail in absentee-ballot case". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
102. "What we know about the voter fraud scheme in Mesa County". Colorado Public Radio. October 24, 2024. Retrieved October 25, 2024.
103. Robertson, Gary D. (April 22, 2020). "North Carolina ballot probe defendant now faces federal charges". Burlington Times-News . AP. Archived from the original on July 18, 2020. Retrieved June 27, 2020.
104. "Drop boxes have become key to election conspiracy theories. Two Democrats just fueled those claims". AP News. October 7, 2023. Archived from the original on September 9, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
105. Kessler, Glenn (June 9, 2021). "Brooks's claim that counting the votes of 'eligible American citizens' would have reelected Trump". Washington Post. Most reputable studies have found that in virtually all cases, any vote fraud by noncitizens is infinitesimal.
106. Swenson, Ali (May 18, 2024). "Noncitizen voting, already illegal in federal elections, becomes a centerpiece of 2024 GOP messaging". AP News. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved September 6, 2024. Republicans who have been vocal about voting by those who are not citizens have demurred when asked for evidence that it's a problem. Last week, during a news conference on his federal legislation to require proof of citizenship during voter registration, House Speaker Mike Johnson couldn't provide examples of the crime happening.
     'The answer is that it's unanswerable,' the Louisiana Republican said in response to a question about whether such people were illegally voting. 'We all know, intuitively, that a lot of illegals are voting in federal elections, but it's not been something that is easily provable.'

     Election administration experts say it's not only provable, but it's been demonstrated that the number of noncitizens voting in federal elections is infinitesimal.
107. Wolf, Zachary B. (September 12, 2024). "Analysis: What the data actually shows about whether undocumented immigrants vote in US elections | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
108. "Fact checking Trump and Johnson's election integrity announcement". CNN. April 12, 2024. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. Despite Johnson's focus on this topic, it is extremely rare, according to decades of voting data and nonpartisan experts. It's so uncommon that voting experts don't see it as a problem plaguing US elections.
109. Lieb, David (September 2, 2024). "Noncitizen voting is extremely rare, yet Republicans are making it a major election concern". PBS News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. In Georgia, Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger found that 1,634 potential noncitizens tried to register to vote between 1997 and 2022, though election officials flagged them and none was registered. Georgia registered millions of other voters during that time.
110. "Rigging An Election? It's Not So Easy, Voting Law Expert Says". WVTF. October 25, 2016. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024. 'And what we know about non-citizen voting is that it's also extremely rare. It does happen occasionally. Sometimes it happens because non-citizens are registered to vote and don't know they're not allowed to vote. There are very few cases of this.'
111. Morse, Clara Ence (May 9, 2024). "Noncitizen voting is extremely rare. Republicans are focusing on it anyway". Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 6, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. But experts say the Republican spotlight on the issue glosses over two crucial facts: Noncitizen voting is exceedingly rare, and it is already banned in almost all places, including the ones with ballot measures in November. That hasn't stopped Republicans from making the issue a frequent talking point. The unfounded threat brings together two issues Republicans believe will drive turnout with their base: illegal immigration and election fraud claims. Critics warn that attempts to crack down on noncitizen voting could suppress the votes of Latino voters who fear being wrongly accused of illegally casting ballots. They say they could also lead to database mismatches that push legitimate voters off the rolls.
112. "Here's Why Republicans Are Focusing on Voting by Noncitizens". New York Times. May 21, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. House Republicans are pushing legislation to crack down on voting by noncitizens, which is allowed in some local elections but illegal – and exceedingly rare – at the federal level...
113. "House passes bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote, fanning a GOP election-year talking point". AP News. July 10, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024– via PBS News. The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration, a proposal Republicans have prioritized as an election-year talking point even as research shows noncitizens illegally registering and casting ballots in federal elections is exceptionally rare.
114. Mathur-Ashton, Aneeta (May 24, 2024). "Sorting the Fiction From the Facts About Noncitizen Voting". US News & World Report. While the bills echo a favorite claim from Republicans regarding election fraud, several years of research and data suggest that the problem they attempt to solve up to now has been so rare as to be insignificant.
115. Parks, Miles (April 12, 2024). "Republicans aim to stop noncitizen voting in federal elections. It's already illegal". NPR. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved April 21, 2024. Numerous studies have also confirmed that it almost never happens, but as more conservative voters say immigration is a key issue for them, it's become clearer that election misinformation in 2024 will center on the topic as well.
116. Leingang, Rachel; Levine, Sam (October 3, 2024). "Republicans' non-citizen voting myth sets stage to claim stolen election". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved October 4, 2024.
117. Lieb, David A. (September 1, 2024). "Illegal voting by noncitizens is rare, yet Republicans are making it a major issue this election". AP News. Archived from the original on September 1, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024. Voting by noncitizens is rare.
118. Parks, Miles (October 3, 2024). "Driven by Republicans, most Americans are concerned about fraud in the 2024 election". NPR. There has never been evidence to support the idea that noncitizens register and vote in anything but microscopic numbers.
119. Parks, Miles (November 3, 2024). "A simple truth is at the root of many false election claims: Voter rolls are imperfect". NPR. To be clear, every bit of research finds that noncitizens don't vote in anything but microscopic numbers.
120. Sherman, Amy. "Do states verify citizenship of voters in federal elections?". PolitiFact . Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024. Cases of noncitizens voting are statistically rare. Some noncitizens accidentally end up on voter rolls when applying for drivers' licenses.
121. Rogers, Kaleigh (May 29, 2024). "Republicans are ramping up election fraud claims ahead of November". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. ...election denialism continues to be the Republican tack as long as Trump remains the captain, and it could once again have very serious repercussions if he isn't victorious in November.
122. infinitesimal ^{[105] [106] [107]} Extremely rare ^{[108] [109] [110]} Exceedingly rare ^{[111] [112]} Exceptionally rare ^[113] So rare as to be insignificant ^[114] Almost never happens ^[115] Nonexistent problem ^[116] Rare ^[117] Microscopic numbers ^{[118] [119]} Statistically rare ^[120] Very rare ^[121]
123. Beitsch, Rebecca; Bernal, Rafael (May 12, 2024). "Speaker Johnson's 'intuition' on illegal voting clashes with data". The Hill. Retrieved September 9, 2024. 'The consequences are so severe that really this is not something that anybody would risk,' Sweren-Becker said. 'And that intuition actually bears out in the numbers.'
124. Waldman, Michael; Karson, Kendall; Singh, Jasleen (April 12, 2024). "Noncitizens Are Not Voting in Federal or State Elections – Here's Why". Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved April 21, 2024. The answer is: just about no one. Every legitimate study ever done on the question shows that voting by noncitizens in state and federal elections is vanishingly rare.
125. "Fact checking Trump and Johnson's election integrity announcement | CNN Politics". CNN. April 12, 2024. Archived from the original on April 22, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024. 'The penalties are high, and the payoff is low,' said Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the UCLA School of Law. 'If you aren't a citizen and you vote, and you're caught, you can face deportation and criminal penalties. And your chances of affecting an election outcome are small. It's very unlikely someone would purposely choose to vote as a noncitizen.'
126. Sherman, Amy (December 7, 2020). "Do states verify U.S. citizenship as a condition for voting?". Austin American-Statesman . Archived from the original on August 2, 2024. Retrieved April 21, 2024.
127. Millhiser, Ian (September 9, 2024). "Republicans threaten a government shutdown unless Congress makes it harder to vote". Vox. Retrieved September 10, 2024. There is no evidence that noncitizens vote in US federal elections in any meaningful numbers, and states typically have safeguards in place to prevent them from doing so.
128. Beitsch, Rebecca; Bernal, Rafael (May 12, 2024). "Speaker Johnson's 'intuition' on illegal voting clashes with data". The Hill. Retrieved September 9, 2024. Unlike other crimes where it can be difficult to sort out the culprit, voter registration and casting a ballot creates the paper trail that is itself the crime.
     Noncitizens who even register to vote or take another action to falsely claim they are a citizen could face up to five years in prison, and those who cast a ballot could be incarcerated for up to one year.
129. Hills, Sophie (September 11, 2024). "Are noncitizens really voting in US elections?". CSMonitor.com. Retrieved September 21, 2024. Many voters demonstrate citizenship status when obtaining certain forms of identification, but state rules vary. Among those with stricter rules: ... Texas: Requires state court clerks to notify the secretary of state of those excused or disqualified from jury duty for not being a U.S. citizen. If those people don't provide proof of citizenship within 30 days of being notified, their voter registration can be canceled. Georgia: May cross-check voters' Social Security numbers against state databases.
130. Fessler, Pam (February 26, 2019). "Some Noncitizens Do Wind Up Registered To Vote, But Usually Not On Purpose". NPR. While claims of massive illegal voting by noncitizens have routinely been disproved, some noncitizens have ended up on the rolls, usually by accident.
131. Evans, Nick (July 12, 2024). "U.S. House Speaker cites unproven Ohio evidence in support of new proof-of-citizenship voting bill • Ohio Capital Journal". Ohio Capital Journal. Archived from the original on September 4, 2024. Retrieved September 11, 2024.
132. Parks, Miles (November 3, 2024). "A simple truth is at the root of many false election claims: Voter rolls are imperfect". NPR. This is the leading conspiracy theory of 2024, and a big part of why it sustains is because non-U.S. citizens do end up on voter rolls sometimes.
     To be clear, every bit of research finds that noncitizens don't vote in anything but microscopic numbers.
133. "Noncitizen voting isn't an issue in federal elections, regardless of conspiracy theories. Here's why". AP News. April 12, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024. The theory involves two complicated subjects, immigration and voting, but it's actually very simple. There isn't any indication that noncitizens vote in significant numbers in federal elections or that they will in the future. It's already a crime for them to do so. And we know it's not a danger because various states have examined their rolls and found very few noncitizen voters.
134. Kestler-D'Amours, Jillian (September 12, 2024). "Trump's false voter fraud claims set stage for turmoil – again". Al Jazeera. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
135. Reichlin-Melnick, Aaron (August 1, 2024). "Unpacking Myths About Noncitizen Voting – How Heritage Foundation's Own Data Proves It's Not a Problem". Immigration Impact. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
136. Steffen, Sarah (July 7, 2024). "How big is the risk of voter fraud in US elections?". dw.com. Retrieved September 9, 2024. The conservative Heritage Foundation think tank put together an election fraud database and found 24 cases involving noncitizens voting between 2003 and 2023.
137. Doran, Will (November 21, 2019). "Fact check: Are immigrants voting illegally in North Carolina?". Raleigh News & Observer. Archived from the original on January 10, 2021. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
138. Specht, Paul. "Are noncitizens straining North Carolina services? Here are the facts". @politifact. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
139. Lah, Kyung; Gajilan, A. Chris (November 1, 2018). "The war on voting rights: Will your ballot count? | CNN Politics". CNN. Archived from the original on September 10, 2024. Retrieved September 10, 2024. In the three years Kobach has had the authority, 15 people have been charged with voter fraud. Of the 14 convicted, three have been non-citizens, including one in the process of becoming a naturalized citizen who had not been sworn in. That's three non-citizens over the course of several elections in a state with 1.8 million registered voters.
140. Mansfield, Erin (April 12, 2024). "Speaker Mike Johnson said noncitizen voting is a 'threat.' The facts say otherwise". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on August 31, 2024. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
141. Mangold, Barry (September 23, 2024). "Oregon DMV error mistakenly registered 1,200+ noncitizen". KPIC. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
142. Joffe-Block, Jude; Parks, Miles (October 18, 2024). "How Republicans mainstreamed the baseless idea of noncitizen voting in 2024". NPR. Exaggerated claims about noncitizens committing voter fraud actually go back to the 1800s. And experts say they usually spike during periods of nonwhite immigration due to fears about how the influx of people will change the country.
143. Ventura, Jorge (August 25, 2024). "Fact check: GOP claims on noncitizen voting lack evidence". NewsNation. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
144. Herman, Alice (July 10, 2024). "The man who cries voter fraud: how Hans von Spakovsky has built a career peddling election security fears". the Guardian. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
145. "Speaker Mike Johnson and Trump allies who tried to overturn the 2020 election roll out voting 'integrity' bill". NBC News. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on September 20, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024.
146. "GOP crackdowns on noncitizen voting ensnare newly naturalized Americans". NBC News. August 29, 2024. Archived from the original on September 1, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024. With Republican officials around the country like Allen putting a fresh focus on preventing noncitizens from voting – which is already illegal and rare – it's naturalized Americans like Esternita Watkins who will be most affected by such voter roll purges, voting rights advocates and attorneys say.
147. Joffe-Block, Jude (August 30, 2024). "The GOP is making false claims about noncitizens voting. It's affecting real voters". NPR. Most commonly, naturalized citizens are erroneously flagged as noncitizens due to election officials cross checking voter rolls with old data.
148. "A Virginia voter roll purge sparks renewed rhetoric over 'non-citizens' casting ballots". NBC News. August 23, 2024. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024. The use of immigrant records under the SAVE system to verify voter rolls has been criticized by voting rights and immigration advocates because it's not foolproof.
149. Rebecca Beitsch, Rafael Bernal (May 12, 2024). "Speaker Johnson's 'intuition' on illegal voting clashes with data". The Hill. Retrieved September 19, 2024.
150. Evon, Dan (November 16, 2018). "Were 53,000 Dead People Found on Florida's Voter Rolls?". Snopes. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 19, 2024. The initial list of 180,000 names was whittled to 2,625, according to the Florida Department of State. The state then checked a federal database and stated it found 207 noncitizens on the rolls (not necessarily voting but on the rolls). That list was sent to county election supervisors to check and it also turned out to contain errors. An Aug. 1, 2012, state elections document showed only 85 noncitizens were ultimately removed from the rolls out of a total of about 12 million voters at that time.
151. Kasprak, Alex (May 31, 2024). "'New Study' Found 10 to 27% of Noncitizens in US Are Registered to Vote?". Snopes. Retrieved September 8, 2024. One independent researcher, James Agresti, published a re-interpretation of a widely discredited 2014 paper to make untenable conclusions about non-citizen voting behavior in 2024. No "new study" concluded that 10 to 27% of noncitizens in the U.S. are registered to vote.
152. Weiser, Wendy; Keith, Douglas (February 13, 2017). "The Actually True and Provable Facts About Non-Citizen Voting". TIME. Archived from the original on September 8, 2024. Retrieved September 8, 2024. First, the president – and his Senior Advisor Stephen Miller – cited a study by Jesse Richman and David Earnest, two professors at Old Dominion University, which claimed 14 percent of non-citizens are registered to vote. That study has been thoroughly debunked by prominent experts for relying on a sample so small that the findings could be explained by response error. The report's own author said it does not support the president's claim.
153. "Illegal Voting Claims, and Why They Don't Hold Up". New York Times. January 26, 2017. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 8, 2024. Mr. Richman still maintains that some small percentage of noncitizens vote in American elections. But the debate over this study has moved on. It's no longer about whether millions of illegal votes were cast, but whether there's any evidence for noncitizen voting at all. The study's bold claims fell apart because of something called response error: the possibility that people taking a survey don't answer a question correctly – in this case, a question about being American citizens. There is always a tiny amount of response error in surveys. Respondents might not understand the question. Or they might understand it, but mark the wrong answer by mistake, if the survey is self-administered. An interviewer, if there is one, could accidentally record the wrong answer. Such errors usually aren't a problem large enough to change the results of a survey.
154. Lapowsky, Issie. "Author of Trump's Favorite Voter Fraud Study Says Everyone's Wrong". Wired. ISSN   1059-1028. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
155. Huseman, Jessica (June 19, 2018). "How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested – and Utterly Failed". ProPublica. Retrieved September 8, 2024. Academics pilloried Richman's conclusions. Two hundred political scientists signed an open letter criticizing the study, saying it should 'not be cited or used in any debate over fraudulent voting.' Harvard's Stephen Ansolabehere, who administered the CCES, published his own peer-reviewed paper lambasting Richman's work. Indeed, by the time Trump read Richman's article onstage in 2016, The Washington Post had already appended a note to the op-ed linking to three rebuttals and a peer-reviewed study debunking the research.
156. Olson, Walter (April 11, 2024). "Commentary: The Right's Bogus Claims about Noncitizen Voting Fraud". Cato Institute. Retrieved October 4, 2024. Aside from larger databases, administrators may (for example) obtain from court authorities a list of persons who ask to be excused from jury duty on the grounds that they are not citizens. Not infrequently these people turn out to have been fibbing to the court clerk to get out of jury service and are in fact native-born citizens – thus generating a false positive. Other false positive matches can arise because someone omits to check the 'citizen' box on a driver's license application even though they are in fact a citizen, or because databases take a while to catch up after someone becomes a U.S. citizen through naturalization.
     The more people believe elections are rigged, the more they are likely to turn their discontents in a direction other than electoral politics. Some will go the passive route of resignation, withdrawing from civic involvements, making themselves the perfect subjects for strongman rule. Others will turn to militia activity or outright violence.
157. Rebecca Beitsch, Rafael Bernal (May 12, 2024). "Speaker Johnson's 'intuition' on illegal voting clashes with data". The Hill. Archived from the original on September 9, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024. That's a conclusion that's also been reached by the libertarian Cato Institute, with one of its experts calling the claims one of the 'most frequent and less serious criticisms' relating to migration.
158. Rogers, Kaleigh (May 29, 2024). "Republicans are ramping up election fraud claims ahead of November". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024. Even the libertarian think tank the Cato Institute has debunked the idea that noncitizens vote in significant numbers.
159. Bensinger, Ken; Fausset, Richard (September 7, 2024). "Heritage Foundation Spreads Deceptive Videos About Noncitizen Voters". New York Times. Archived from the original on September 7, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024. The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, has said that 'noncitizens don't illegally vote in detectable numbers.'
160. Elbein, Saul (September 4, 2024). "Texas AG Paxton sues Democratic county that defied him on voter registration plan". The Hill. Archived from the original on September 17, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024. The rate of noncitizen voting is effectively zero, a May report by the libertarian Cato Institute found.
161. Olson, Walter (May 22, 2024). "Shedding Light on the Incidence of Illegal Noncitizen Voting". www.cato.org. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024.
162. Hasen, Richard L. (August 6, 2012). "Opinion: A Détente Before the Election". New York Times (Campaign Stops). Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024. Noncitizen voting is a real, if small, problem: a Congressional investigation found that some noncitizens voted in the close 1996 House race in California between Robert K. Dornan, a Republican, and Loretta Sanchez, a Democrat, but not enough to affect the outcome. Unlike impersonation fraud, noncitizen voting cannot be dismissed as a Republican fantasy.
163. Hasen, Rick (October 26, 2014). "About That Monkey Cage Item on Non-Citizen Voting, Calm Down #ELB". Election Law Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2024. Retrieved September 21, 2024. As I indicated in my book, The Voting Wars, non-citizen voting is a real, if relatively small, problem.
164. Mock, Brentin (August 17, 2012). "What's Ahead in the 'Voting Wars'? Certainly Not Peace". The Nation. Archived from the original on September 9, 2024. Retrieved September 21, 2024. In the book, you say there is a small problem in the nation with non-citizen voting. Explain. There is some evidence of non-citizens who are registered to vote. There's much less evidence that these non-citizens are actually voting, but there are occasional cases where it happens.
165. Carcamo, Cindy (August 26, 2014). "Court hears arguments on voters having to prove citizenship". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on August 26, 2014. Retrieved September 21, 2024. But Richard Hasen, a professor of law and political science at UC Irvine, calls noncitizen voting "not a phantom problem," as Democrats often describe it. "But the number of noncitizens registered and voting is small....
166. ^{[162] [163] [164] [165]}
167. Hasen, Richard L. (2020). "Chapter 1". Election meltdown: dirty tricks, distrust, and the threat to American democracy. Yale University Press. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, [2020]. ISBN   978-0-300-24819-7.
168. "Can noncitizens vote in US elections?". AP News. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
169. Willis, Derek (November 7, 2016). "Double Voting is Extremely Rare, and One Solution Might Be Worse". ProPublica. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
170. Kinsey, Troy (September 5, 2020). "Q&A: How Common is Double-Voting?". News 13. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
171. Extremely rare ^{[169] [170]} Exceptionally rare ^[14]
172. Niesse, Mark (February 8, 2022). "Investigation undercuts claim that 1,000 people voted twice in Georgia". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on October 18, 2022. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
173. Parks, Miles (June 4, 2023). "How the far right tore apart one of the best tools to fight voter fraud". NPR. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. ERIC is currently the only system that can catch if someone votes in more than one state, which is illegal.
174. McDonald, Michael P.; Levitt, Justin (June 2008). "Seeing Double Voting: An Extension of the Birthday Problem". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 7 (2): 111–122. doi:10.1089/elj.2008.7202. ISSN   1533-1296. SSRN   997888. We show that these allegations are inflated by not appropriately accounting for the Birthdate Problem, and discuss the implications of the Birthdate Problem for the debate over double voting and the means to address this perceived fraud...Among these are a handful of substantiated instances of persons who have voted twice in the same election, though these are notable mostly for their rarity.
175. Koslof, Evan (October 19, 2020). "VERIFY: Yes, it's legal to be registered to vote in multiple states. Here's one way officials track moves". wusa9.com. Archived from the original on September 26, 2023. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
176. "Double Voting". NCSL. July 4, 2024. Archived from the original on August 28, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
177. Wines, Michael (September 7, 2022). "In Voter Fraud, Penalties Often Depend on Who's Voting". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 8, 2022. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
178. "Voting felonies dropped for 5 from North Carolina under plea". AP News. August 13, 2018. Archived from the original on September 18, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
179. Healy, Jack (August 2, 2018). "Arrested, Jailed and Charged With a Felony. For Voting". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 14, 2021. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
180. Boughton, Melissa (August 14, 2018). "Five of 12 Alamance residents charged with voter fraud take plea deals to lesser crimes • NC Newsline". NC Newsline. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
181. Groves, Isaac (September 3, 2024). "More Alamance 12 plead out in illegal voting cases". Winston-Salem Journal. Archived from the original on September 9, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
182. Levine, Sam (June 10, 2024). "She was sentenced to prison for voting. Her story is part of a Republican effort to intimidate others". the Guardian. Retrieved September 25, 2024.
183. Lauren Carroll (January 25, 2017). "Sean Spicer wrongly uses Pew study to bolster claim that non-citizens vote in large numbers". PolitiFact.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2019. Retrieved February 12, 2017.
184. Pam Fessler (February 14, 2012). "Study: 1.8 Million Dead People Still Registered to Vote". NPR. Archived from the original on January 31, 2016. Retrieved January 18, 2016.
185. Cassidy, Christina A. (October 25, 2016). "AP FACT CHECK: Voter roll problems do not equate to fraud". AP News. Archived from the original on September 1, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
186. "Michigan voter rolls inflated by 500K. State says it's no issue. GOP disagrees". Bridge Michigan. October 16, 2024. Retrieved October 20, 2024. While critics say the inflated rolls are not ideal, no one is suggesting they have contributed to fraud.
187. Swenson, Ali (October 21, 2022). "How do states ensure dead people's ballots aren't counted?". AP News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 18, 2024.
188. Barr, Barbara (November 1, 2024). "Voter registration fraud case widens in Pennsylvania". WGAL. Retrieved November 23, 2024.
189. Cohen, Marshall (October 20, 2024). "Elon Musk's daily $1 million giveaway to registered voters could be illegal, experts say". CNN. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
190. Carter, Stephen L. (December 4, 2021). "Yes, Vote-Buying Is Illegal. But Why?". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on November 18, 2022. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
191. Sønderholm, Jørn; Mainz, Jakob Thrane (January 24, 2023). "Why Busing Voters to the Polling Station is Paying People to Vote". Law and Philosophy. 42 (5). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 437–459. doi: 10.1007/s10982-022-09469-3 . ISSN   0167-5249.
192. Kenning, Chris (November 20, 2022). "How a legacy of vote-buying haunts elections in this Kentucky county". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on October 21, 2024. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
193. Herchenroeder, Katie (October 20, 2024). "Elon Musk Promises To Give $1 Million To Someone Everyday Until Election But There's a Catch". Vanity Fair. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
194. Tomazin, Farrah (October 20, 2024). "Musk accused of illegally paying for votes with $US1 million election giveaway". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
195. "Elon Musk criticised for offering $1mn prizes to voters who sign petition". Financial Times. October 20, 2024. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
196. Renshaw, Jarrett (October 20, 2024). "Elon Musk's election promise of $1 million daily giveaway sparks call for probe". Reuters. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
197. Chidi, George (October 15, 2024). "'There are certain things that we don't allow to be sold': why vote buying in the US is illegal". the Guardian. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
198. Harris, Geoff (October 15, 2024). "Vote buying illegal in the US, but Musk and card game company not breaking law". KDBC. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
199. Bahamonde, Héctor (July 22, 2020). "Still for sale: the micro-dynamics of vote selling in the United States, evidence from a list experiment". Acta Politica . 57 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 73–95. doi:10.1057/s41269-020-00174-4. ISSN   0001-6810.
200. Vasilogambros, Matt (May 3, 2018). "What Stops Political Campaigns From Forging Signatures? Not Much. • Stateline". Stateline. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
201. Benson, Jocelyn Friedrichs (2007). "Election Fraud and the Initiative Process: A Study of the 2006 Michigan Civil Rights Initiative". Fordham Urban Law Journal. 34 (3): 889–934. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 21, 2024. The Ninth Circuit also noted Oregon's "important regulatory interest in preventing fraud and its appearances in the electoral processes,"206 and cited testimony detailing "reports of interviews of various signature gatherers (paid per signature) who had forged signatures on their petitions; purchased signature sheets filled with signatures . . . ; or participated in 'signature parties' in which multiple petition circulators would gather and sign each others' petitions."
202. Lopez, Ashley (April 6, 2023). "The price of a ballot signature is way up, and experts worry it's encouraging fraud". NPR. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
203. Mazzei, Patricia (October 28, 2016). "Two women busted for election fraud in Miami-Dade in 2016". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on June 2, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
204. Dimick, Kayla (December 4, 2019). "Judge hears testimony in Hawkins case". C & G Newspapers. Archived from the original on June 13, 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
205. "Uncounted votes in Summit County". freepress.org. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
206. Miller, A. (2005). "Executive Summary. In What Went Wrong in Ohio: The Conyers Report on the 2004 Presidential Election" (PDF). Retrieved October 16, 2024.
207. Shah, Khushbu (December 12, 2018). "Absentee-ballot fraud scandal speaks to wider issue of racism in North Carolina". The Guardian. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
208. Estep, Bill (November 30, 2013). "Decades of poverty and vote-buying led to widespread corruption in Clay County". Lexington Herald Leader. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 18, 2024.
209. Sabato, Larry; Simpson, Glenn R. (1996). "Chapter 10: "Everybody's Doin' It": Bipartisan Corruption". Dirty Little Secrets: The Persistence of Corruption in American Politics. Times Books. pp. 297–300. ISBN   978-0-8129-2499-2 . Retrieved September 17, 2024. In contrast to the absence of the press, the alert reader has probably already noticed that Democrats feature prominently in almost all of the instances of voter fraud featured in this chapter. ... the GOP is fully capable of voting hijinks when circumstances permit. ... In many states, particularly in the South and some border states, the GOP has rarely if ever controlled the local and legislative offices necessary to set the rules and manipulate the election process. ... the pool of people who appear to be available and more vulnerable to an invitation to participate in vote fraud tend to lean Democratic in their partisan predisposition, such as low-income minorities.
210. Nalewicki, Jennifer (November 2, 2020). "A Glass Ballot Box Was the Answer to Voter Fraud in the 19th Century". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on April 18, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
211. Ackerman, S.J. (November 1998). "The Vote That Failed". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
212. Gumbel, Andrew (2008). "Election Fraud and the Myths of American Democracy". Social Research: An International Quarterly. 75 (4): 1109–1134. doi:10.1353/sor.2008.0004. ISSN   1944-768X.
213. Dotinga, Randy (March 26, 2023). "Did voter fraud kill Edgar Allan Poe?". Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 26, 2023. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
214. Zarrelli, Natalie (September 7, 2016). "Election Fraud in the 1800s Involved Kidnapping and Forced Drinking". Atlas Obscura. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
215. "Fraud! Fraud!; Gone are the days (aren't they?) when dead men and dogs could 'vote' and The Boss held sway". The New York Times. September 27, 1964. Archived from the original on October 18, 2022. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
216. Smith, Ron (May 8, 2022). "Want to find real election fraud? Look at the history of Kansas, United States in 1800s". Kansas Reflector. Archived from the original on July 18, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
217. Garrison, Zach. "Lecompton Constitution". Civil War on the Western Border: The Missouri-Kansas Conflict, 1854-1865. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
218. Shafer, Ronald (November 24, 2020). "The ugliest presidential election in history: Fraud, voter intimidation and a backroom deal". Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 24, 2020. Retrieved August 25, 2024. Vote fraud was widespread on both sides.
219. Shafer, Ronald (December 28, 2020). "Trump 2024? Only one president has returned to power after losing reelection". Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 24, 2020. Retrieved August 25, 2024. Like Trump, Stephen Grover Cleveland lost reelection amid charges of voter fraud. Unlike the 2020 election, there actually was clear evidence of fraud in some states, especially Indiana.
220. "John Middleton Clayton (1840–1889)". Encyclopedia of Arkansas. November 15, 2023. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
221. "Barnes Compton (1830–1898) Extended Biography". Annapolis, Maryland: Archives of Maryland (Biographical Series). 2008. MSA SC 3520-1545. Archived from the original on July 16, 2020. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
222. "Governor's Election of 1892". Encyclopedia of Alabama. March 27, 2023. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
223. Harden, Blaine (December 20, 1996). "DISPUTED ELECTION STIRS MEMORIES OF LOUISIANA'S SHADY POLITICAL PAST". Washington Post. Retrieved September 14, 2024. Since direct election of senators began after the 1913 ratification of the 17th Amendment, only four challengers have persuaded the Senate to overrule the outcome of an election.
224. "Alabama Constitution of 1901". Encyclopedia of Alabama. April 16, 2024. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved September 11, 2024.
225. Ivey, Bill (November 1, 2020). "How a scandalous voter fraud scheme dooms Alabama". al. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
226. "Hearst's Flamboyant Run For City Hall in 1905". CUNY Matters. 2001. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
227. Campbell, T. (2005). Deliver the Vote: A History of Election Fraud, an American Political Tradition, 1742-2004. Carroll & Graf. p. 154. ISBN   978-0-7867-1591-6. Archived from the original on September 7, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2024. Even when fraud was proven, the remedy could be hollow. In the Tenth Congressional District of Pennsylvania in 1918, the Democrat, Patrick McLane, was at first declared the winner, while the Republican, John R. Farr, contested the election. Over nearly two years, a Congressional committee examined the case; they determined in February 1921 that "wholesale fraud" had indeed cheated Farr out of his seat, and, by a 161 to 121 vote on the House floor, McLane was unseated and Farr sworn in to serve out the remainder of his term – six days.
228. Rubin, Alissa J. (November 9, 2000). "Vote Fraud a Tradition in Political Yesteryear". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
229. Leavitt, Dylan Hayley (February 24, 2014). "Huey Long's Life and Legacy". PBS (Antiques Roadshow). Retrieved September 14, 2024.
230. Texas State Historical Association (1949). "Texas Almanac, 1949-1950". The Portal to Texas History. The Dallas Morning News. p. 474. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved March 24, 2022.
231. Tolchin, Martin (February 11, 1990). "How Johnson Won Election He'd Lost". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 18, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
232. Balz, Dan (March 4, 1990). "THE MYSTERY OF BALLOT BOX 13". Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 2, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
233. "City's primary election tabulated in record time". Chicago Tribune. March 7, 2003. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 6, 2024. Some historians have attributed John Kennedy's win in Illinois in the 1960 presidential election to vote tampering in the fraud-riddled wards.
234. Zeitz, Josh (January 27, 2021). "Worried About a Rigged Election? Here's One Way to Handle It". POLITICO Magazine. Archived from the original on June 26, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
235. "BROOKLYN GRAND JURY FINDS FRAUD IN 8 PRIMARIES". The New York Times. September 5, 1984. Archived from the original on July 20, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
236. Mayer, Jane (October 29, 2012). "The Voter-Fraud Myth". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved March 11, 2016.
237. Pearson, Rick (October 19, 2016). "Despite Trump claim, officials say technology means vote fraud thing of past". Chicago Tribune . Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 14, 2024.
238. "Election fraud Chicago style: Illinois' decades-old notoriety for election corruption is legendary". Salon. February 14, 2016. Archived from the original on July 23, 2024. Retrieved March 27, 2020.
239. "Report of the Special January 1982 Grand Jury" (PDF). United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. December 14, 1984. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
240. "2 REVIEWS BARE UP TO 100,000 IRREGULARITIES". Chicago Tribune. March 8, 1987. Archived from the original on April 22, 2024. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
241. "'MASSIVE' FRAUD REPORTED DURING CHICAGO PRIMARY". Washington Post. March 9, 1987. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
242. "WEBB ASKS PRIMARY VOTE FRAUD PROBE". Chicago Tribune. March 11, 1987. Archived from the original on August 28, 2024. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
243. "Vote-Fraud Ruling Shifts Pennsylvania Senate". The New York Times. February 19, 1994. Archived from the original on October 13, 2021. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
244. "Proof Of Illegal Voters Falls Short, Keeping Sanchez In House". CNN. February 13, 1998. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
245. Gugliotta, Guy (February 5, 1998). "Dornan Challenge to Sanchez Rejected Record". Washington Post. Archived from the original on March 31, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
246. Minnite, Lorraine C.; Minnite, Lorraine Carol (2010). "Chapter 3". The myth of voter fraud (1. publ ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN   978-0-8014-4848-5. But in December 1997, with the district attorney's case involving evidence gleaned from over 300 interviews conducted by 40 investigators and a review of 33,000 documents before it, a grand jury declined to bring a single indictment. This closed the criminal investigation of Hermandad and severely undermined the veracity of Dornan's allegations that hundreds of noncitizens had fraudulently voted in Orange County...
     the House Committee investigation took a full year and produced, in the end, a disputed finding of fraud that was too insubstantial to convince the Republican-dominated House to reverse Sanchez's victory. On February 12, 1998, the House voted 378-33 to dismiss Dornan's contest.
247. Hasen, Richard L. (2020). Election meltdown: dirty tricks, distrust, and the threat to American democracy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-24819-7. The last prominent investigation into potential noncitizen voting involved a 1996 Orange County, California, congressional race between Bob Dornan and Loretta Sanchez. The evidence was highly contested.
248. Navarro, Mireya (March 5, 1998). "Fraud Ruling Invalidates Miami Mayoral Election". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 8, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
249. Lee, Kurtis (January 25, 2017). "Here's how voter fraud once tipped an election". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on September 7, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2024.
250. Chapman, Tim (October 28, 2016). "You can't keep up with South Florida voter fraud without a scorecard". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on April 10, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
251. "How Could Voting by Mail Affect the Election? Look at Michigan". The New York Times. October 11, 2020. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved September 6, 2024. A 2018 absentee ballot tampering scandal in North Carolina was notable for being one of the few widespread attempts at election fraud.
252. "How Kentucky Does Election Fraud: Vote Buying". Louisville Public Media. November 3, 2016. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
253. Khan, Natasha; Carson, Corbin (August 13, 2012). "Election-fraud not as common as recent voter ID laws suggest". Center for Public Integrity . Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
254. "Court orders new election in E. Chicago". Chicago Tribune. August 7, 2004. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
255. Norton, Michael; Andy Metzger (December 20, 2012). "Everett Rep. To Plead Guilty To Voter Fraud, Resign". WBUR . Retrieved January 25, 2013.
256. Andersen, Travis (December 20, 2012). "Mass. lawmaker will plead guilty to voter fraud". Boston.com. Retrieved November 2, 2024.
257. Wilson, Charles (February 4, 2012). "Indiana election chief found guilty of voter fraud". Foster's Daily Democrat/AP. Retrieved November 2, 2024.
258. "Ex-Indiana Sec'y of State White Loses Law License". Illinois Public Media. April 26, 2012. Retrieved November 2, 2024.
259. Perry, Kimball (July 17, 2013). "Ohioan gets 5-year prison term for illegal voting". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on August 28, 2024. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
260. Coolidge, Sharon (March 21, 2014). "Both parties jeer embrace of fraudulent voter". Cincinnati Enquirer. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
261. Roebuck, Jeremy (September 27, 2022). "Former Abscam Congressman 'Ozzie' Myers is headed back to federal prison". Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
262. "New election ordered in North Carolina House district after possible illegal activities". NBC News. February 21, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
263. Fausset, Richard; Blinder, Alan; Ember, Sydney; Williams, Timothy; Kovaleski, Serge (December 8, 2018). "North Carolina's 'Guru of Elections': Can-Do Operator Who May Have Done Too Much". New York Times. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
264. "State of North Carolina vs. Leslie McCrae Dowless, et al" (PDF). New York Times. July 30, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
265. "Southfield clerk pleads no contest in 2018 election case". CBS Detroit. October 20, 2022. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
266. Wingblad, Aileen (December 9, 2022). "Former city clerk sentenced for election-related crime". The Oakland Press. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
267. Brummer, Sheila (April 2, 2024). "The wife of a Woodbury County supervisor convicted of voter fraud is sentenced to four months in prison". Iowa Public Radio. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved July 19, 2024.
268. "Woman Arrested for Voter Fraud Scheme". www.justice.gov. January 12, 2023. Archived from the original on January 12, 2023. Retrieved January 12, 2023.
269. "Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim wins do-over election, Associated Press projects". CBS New York. February 27, 2024. Archived from the original on September 10, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
270. Palast, Greg. "Vigilantes Inc" . Retrieved October 18, 2024.
271. Palast, Greg. "Investigative Journalist". Greg Palast. Retrieved November 23, 2024.
272. Sheagley, Geoffrey; Udani, Adriano (February 2021). "Multiple meanings? The link between partisanship and definitions of voter fraud". Electoral Studies. 69: 102244. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102244.
273. Corbett-Davies, Sam; Konitzer, Tobias; Rothschild, David (October 24, 2016). "Poll: 60% of Republicans believe illegal immigrants vote; 43% believe people vote using dead people's names". Washington Post. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
274. Ura, Alexa (June 25, 2021). "Few Texans believe voting fraud is common, UT/TT poll shows, undercutting GOP rationale for tightening voting rules". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
275. Kamisar, Ben (June 20, 2023). "Almost a third of Americans still believe the 2020 election result was fraudulent". NBC News. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved August 8, 2024.
276. Parks, Miles (October 3, 2024). "Driven by Republicans, most Americans are concerned about fraud in the 2024 election". NPR. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
277. Montanaro, Domenico (July 2, 2021). "Poll: More Americans Are Concerned About Voting Access Than Fraud Prevention". NPR. Archived from the original on September 2, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
278. Cain, Bruce; Ginsberg, Benjamin (June 26, 2024). "Restoring Confidence In American Elections". Hoover Institution. pp. 19–20. Retrieved October 16, 2024. Surveys to date reveal that most voters report a good experience at the polls and have a high level of confidence in the way that elections are conducted in their communities. However, they have far less confidence in the processes in other states and nationally.
279. Pennycook, Gordon; Rand, David G. (January 18, 2021). "Research note: Examining false beliefs about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 Presidential Election". Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. Shorenstein Center for Media, Politics, and Public Policy. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-51. hdl: 1721.1/144267 . We find that a majority of Trump voters in our sample – particularly those who were more politically knowledgeable and more closely following election news – falsely believed that election fraud was widespread, and that Trump won the election.
280. Bowler, Shaun; Donovan, Todd (2016). "A Partisan Model of Electoral Reform: Voter Identification Laws and Confidence in State Elections". State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 16 (3). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 340–361. doi:10.1177/1532440015624102. ISSN   1532-4400. We find that the relationship between photo identification laws and confidence in state elections was polarized and conditioned by party identification in 2014. Democrats in states with strict photo identification laws were less confident in their state's elections. Republicans in states with strict identification laws were more confident than others.
281. Weiss, Joanna (December 19, 2020). "What Happened to the Democrats Who Never Accepted Bush's Election". Politico. Archived from the original on December 5, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2024. Rather than recede with age, in many cases these 2004 skeptics' concerns only deepened. And today, many of these 2004 figures have found a new cause in the 2020 election, embracing Trump's claims about the results even if they are on the opposite end of the ideological spectrum ... Before long, the mainstream apparatus had moved on.
282. Lee, Don S.; Rhee, Inbok; Kuk, John (July 30, 2024). "Flawed research into election fraud can undermine democracy and intensify polarization". The Conversation. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
283. McCarthy, Devin (March 4, 2023). "Do Partisans Follow Their Leaders on Election Manipulation?". Political Communication. 40 (2): 173–200. doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2150728. ISSN   1058-4609.
284. Fried, Amy; Harris, Douglas B. (October 2020). "In Suspense: Donald Trump's Efforts to Undermine Public Trust in Democracy". Society. 57 (5): 527–533. doi:10.1007/s12115-020-00526-y. ISSN   0147-2011. PMC   7595043 . PMID   33144745.
285. Taylor, Matthew D. (October 1, 2024). "Chapter 6". The Violent Take it by Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy. Broadleaf Books.
286. Litt, David (December 4, 2020). "Claims of 'voter fraud' have a long history in America. And they are false". the Guardian. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
287. Oldham, Kit (June 6, 2005). "Judge upholds election of Christine Gregoire in contested governor's race on June 6, 2005". HistoryLink.org. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
288. Fund, John (July 13, 2010). "Felons for Franken". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
289. "Reality Check: Is The Election Rigged?". CBS Minnesota. October 18, 2016. Archived from the original on July 20, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
290. Young, Cathy (November 8, 2022). "Yes, Democrats Have Called Some Elections Illegitimate. GOP Election Denialism Is Far Worse". Cato Institute. Retrieved October 18, 2024.
291. Zeller, Tom Jr. (November 12, 2004). "Vote Fraud Theories, Spread by Blogs, Are Quickly Buried". The New York Times. Retrieved April 11, 2024.
292. "Conspiracy Theories Abound After Bush Victory". ABC News . November 9, 2004. Retrieved August 13, 2024.
293. Gumbel, Andrew (October 25, 2016). "The history of 'rigged' US elections: from Bush v Gore to Trump v Clinton". The Guardian . Retrieved August 13, 2024.
294. Dunham, Will (October 27, 2019). "Long-serving former Democratic U.S. congressman John Conyers dies at age 90". Reuters. Retrieved October 22, 2024.
295. Rubin, Robert (April 1, 2005). "Electoral Machinations in Ohio, 2004". American Bar Association. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
296. Hertsgaard, Mark (November 1, 2005). "Recounting Ohio". Mother Jones. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
297. "Trump plans 'major investigation into voter fraud' amid groundless claims". The Guardian. January 25, 2017. Archived from the original on February 12, 2017. Retrieved February 12, 2017.
298. Lopez, German (January 25, 2017). "It's official: Trump is taking his voter fraud myth to the White House – with real consequences". Vox. Archived from the original on January 25, 2017. Retrieved January 25, 2017.
299. Ryan, Josiah (January 27, 2017). "Trump-cited study author (still) refuses to show proof of voter fraud". CNN. Archived from the original on January 27, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2017.
300. Eli Watkins (February 10, 2017). "FEC commissioner asks Trump for voter fraud evidence". Washington: CNN. Archived from the original on January 19, 2019. Retrieved February 12, 2017.
301. Farley, Robert (February 14, 2017). "No Evidence of Busing Voters to N.H." FactCheck.org. Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on July 17, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
302. Nelson, Louis (May 11, 2017). "Trump signs executive order creating voter fraud commission". Politico . Archived from the original on June 26, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2017.
303. Greenwood, Max (July 4, 2017). "Newspapers rip Trump voter fraud panel in July Fourth editorials". The Hill. Archived from the original on September 18, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
304. "Trump's voter-fraud commission itself is a fraud" Archived November 18, 2020, at the Wayback Machine . The Washington Post . July 18, 2017. Retrieved July 19, 2017, "...In fact, the real fraud is the commission itself...."
305. Miles Rapoport on the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity Archived October 26, 2021, at the Wayback Machine , Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (May 30, 2017): "President Trump's decision to establish a panel to study voter fraud and suppression, the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, has been roundly criticized by voter rights advocates and Democrats." ... [Miles Rapoport, Senior Democracy Practice Fellow Ash Center]: "There are a number of really serious problems with the Commission as it has been announced and conceptualized, which have led many people to say that its conclusions are pre-determined and that it will be used as an excuse for new efforts to restrict access to voting."
306. Michael Waldman, Donald Trump Tells His Voter Fraud Panel: Find Me 'Something' Archived September 11, 2019, at the Wayback Machine , Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law (July 20, 2017) (also republished at The Daily Beast Archived October 24, 2021, at the Wayback Machine ): "The panel was created to justify one of the more outlandish presidential fibs ... After Trump was roundly mocked for his claim of 3 to 5 million illegal voters, the panel was launched in an effort to try to rustle up some evidence – any evidence – for the charge.... The purpose of the panel is not just to try to justify his laughable claims of millions of invisible illegal voters. It aims to stir fears, to lay the ground for new efforts to restrict voting. Trump's claims, after all, are just a cartoon version of the groundless arguments already used to justify restrictive voting laws."
307. Mark Berman & David Weigel, Trump's voting commission asked states to hand over election data. Some are pushing back. Archived November 9, 2020, at the Wayback Machine , Washington Post (June 30, 2017): "Experts described the request as ... a recipe for potential voter suppression.... 'This is an attempt on a grand scale to purport to match voter rolls with other information in an apparent effort to try and show that the voter rolls are inaccurate and use that as a pretext to pass legislation that will make it harder for people to register to vote,' said Rick Hasen, an election-law expert at the University of California, Irvine. Hasen said he has "no confidence" in whatever results the committee produces. He said the commission and its request create a number of concerns, including that it is an election group created by one candidate for office – Trump, who already is campaigning for reelection – and headed by Pence, another political candidate. 'It's just a recipe for a biased and unfair report,' Hasen said. "And it's completely different from the way that every other post-election commission has been done."
308. Tackett, Michael; Wines, Michael (January 4, 2018). "Trump Disbands Commission on Voter Fraud". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on January 4, 2018. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
309. "Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud". AP News. August 3, 2018. Archived from the original on August 18, 2024. Retrieved August 31, 2024.
310. Bertrand, Natasha; Samuelsohn, Darren. "What if Trump won't accept 2020 defeat?". Politico. Archived from the original on July 26, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
311. Gessen, Masha. "What Could Happen If Donald Trump Rejects Electoral Defeat?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on July 31, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
312. "Trump's false claims of rigged voting are 'a perilous thing,' says top Republican expert". Yahoo news. Archived from the original on November 1, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
313. "US election: Trump won't commit to peaceful transfer of power". BBC News. September 24, 2020. Archived from the original on September 27, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
314. Choi, Matthew. "Trump declines to commit to a peaceful transition of power after election". Politico. Archived from the original on September 29, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
315. Kiely, Eugene; Rieder, Rem (September 25, 2020). "Trump's Repeated False Attacks on Mail-In Ballots". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
316. "Here's the reality behind Trump's claims about mail voting". Associated Press. September 30, 2020. Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
317. "Ignoring FBI And Fellow Republicans, Trump Continues Assault On Mail-In Voting". NPR. Archived from the original on May 16, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
318. Chris Cillizza. "Analysis: The FBI director just totally shut down Donald Trump's vote-fraud conspiracy". CNN. Archived from the original on September 25, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
319. Viebeck, Elise (September 28, 2020). "Courts view GOP fraud claims skeptically as Democrats score key legal victories over mail voting". Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 29, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
320. Helderman, Rosalind S.; Brown, Emma; Reinhard, Beth (October 30, 2020). "Republicans shift from challenging rules to preparing to challenge individual ballots". Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 5, 2023. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
321. Yourish, Karen; Smart, Charlie (May 24, 2024). "Trump's Pattern of Sowing Election Doubt Intensifies in 2024". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 24, 2024.
322. Steinhauser, Paul (November 7, 2020). "Biden wins presidency, Trump denied second term in White House, Fox News projects". Fox News. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
323. Stephen Collinson; Maeve Reston. "Biden defeats Trump in an election he made about character of the nation and the President". CNN. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
324. Baragona, Justin (December 14, 2020). "Newsmax Finally Admits Joe Biden Won the Election". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
325. "Biden defeats Trump for White House, says 'time to heal'". Associated Press. November 7, 2020. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
326. King, Ledyard; Fritze, John (November 7, 2020). "Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani says Trump won't concede, revives baseless claims of voter fraud". USA Today. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
327. Davis, Tina (November 7, 2020). "Trump's Election Lawsuits: Where the Fights Are Playing Out". Bloomberg Law. Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
328. "Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign". Reuters. February 15, 2021. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
329. Kestler-D'Amours, Jillian (September 12, 2024). "Trump's false voter fraud claims set stage for turmoil – again". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
330. Rubin, Jennifer. "Opinion | Republicans are still pretending there was election fraud". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 4, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
331. Saletan, William (December 18, 2020). "Republicans Are Manufacturing a Legitimacy Crisis". Slate. Archived from the original on April 10, 2021. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
332. Wines, Michael (February 27, 2021). "In Statehouses, Stolen-Election Myth Fuels a G.O.P. Drive to Rewrite Rules". The New York Times . Archived from the original on March 4, 2021. Retrieved March 17, 2021.
333. "Exhaustive fact check finds little evidence of voter fraud, but 2020's 'Big Lie' lives on". PBS News. December 17, 2021. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
334. Yoon, Robert (August 27, 2023). "Trump's drumbeat of lies about the 2020 election keeps getting louder. Here are the facts". AP News. Archived from the original on March 12, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
335. Hannah Knowles; Paulina Villegas (May 15, 2021). "Man charged with wife's murder illegally cast her ballot for Trump, officials say: 'I just thought, give him another vote'". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
336. Vinny Vella (April 30, 2021). "A Delaware County man admitted he cast an illegal ballot for ex-President Trump and gets sentenced to probation". The Philadelphia Inquirer . Retrieved May 16, 2021.
337. Amy B Wang (October 22, 2021). "Nevada Republican who claimed someone stole dead wife's ballot is charged with voter fraud". The Washington Post.
338. Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (October 2, 2024). "11 damning details in Jack Smith's new brief in the Trump election case". Politico. For example, Trump and allies alleged that 36,000 noncitizens had cast ballots in Arizona, changing the figure to 'a few hundred thousand' five days later, eventually revising it back to 'bare minimum … 40 or 50,000,' then to 32,000 and back up to the original number of 36,000.
339. Hutzler, Alexandra (September 12, 2024). "'Dangerous': Trump's escalating 2024 election rhetoric criticized by officials, experts". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
340. Hasen, Richard L. (January 25, 2024). "Opinion | I'm an Election Law Expert. Here's What I Fear Most in 2024". Politico.
341. Morgan, David; Layne, Nathan (May 9, 2024). "US Republicans target noncitizen voting, as Trump keeps up false voter fraud claims". Reuters.
342. Riccardi, Nicholas; Swenson, Ali (January 24, 2024). "Trump leans into voter fraud playbook, preparing to cry foul if he loses expected Biden rematch". AP News. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
343. Kestler-D'Amours, Jillian (September 12, 2024). "Trump's false voter fraud claims set stage for turmoil – again". Al Jazeera. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
344. Sparks, Steven (August 30, 2024). "Two-thirds of Americans say Trump unprepared to accept the election outcome: POLL". ABC News. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
345. "What will happen if America's election result is contested?" . The Economist . September 12, 2024. ISSN   0013-0613. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
346. Cappelletti, Joey; Swenson, Ali (June 14, 2024). "The RNC is launching a massive effort to monitor voting. Critics say it threatens to undermine trust". AP News. Retrieved September 4, 2024.
347. Harte, Julia; Reid, Tim (December 7, 2023). "Voter advocates, conservative activists brace for 2024 election showdowns". Reuters.
348. "Michigan leaders join national bipartisan effort to push back against attacks on the election system". AP News. September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
349. "'Big lie' 2.0: How Trump's false claims about noncitizens voting lay the groundwork to undermine the election". NBC News . October 25, 2024. Retrieved October 25, 2024.
350. "Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees | CISA". www.cisa.gov. November 12, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
351. "Conspiracy Theories Abound After Bush Victory". ABC News. November 9, 2004. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
352. Ferris, Layla (October 24, 2024). "False claims about machines "switching" votes are going viral. Here's what to know". CBS News. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
353. Thompson, Stuart (October 23, 2024). "No, a Voting Machine Did Not 'Flip' a Vote in Georgia". New York Times. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
354. Rahman, Tahera; Willard • •, Keenan (October 22, 2024). "Tarrant County officials clear up ballot controversy". NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
355. "Texas Lt. Gov. responds after Trump campaign shares false claims of Tarrant County voting issues". NBC Los Angeles. November 2, 2024. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
356. Viala-Gaudefroy, Jérôme (March 3, 2024). "Why do millions of Americans believe the 2020 presidential election was 'stolen' from Donald Trump?". The Conversation. Archived from the original on September 2, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
357. Berzon, Alexandra (September 5, 2024). "Republicans Seize on False Theories About Immigrant Voting". New York Times. Archived from the original on September 7, 2024. Retrieved September 13, 2024. More recently, claims about noncitizens' voting have connected to a broader conspiracy theory, started by white supremacist groups, about immigrants arriving to 'replace' U.S. citizens.
358. Schwarz, Jon (October 19, 2016). "Donald Trump's "Voter Fraud" Lies Are Part of the GOP's DNA". The Intercept. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
359. Castillo, Andrea (September 12, 2024). "GOP targets 'noncitizen voting.' Experts agree it's not a problem". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 13, 2024. In California, the racist myth of immigrant voter fraud goes back at least to 1988, when Republicans in a battle over a state legislative seat hired security guards to police Latino neighborhoods, holding up large placards that said 'Non-citizens Can't Vote!'
360. Ross, Janell (November 25, 2021). "How Donald Trump, defender of political incorrectness, is blowing a loud racial dog whistle on voter ID". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved September 15, 2024.
361. II, Vann R. Newkirk (January 27, 2017). "The Dog-Whistle Secret Code of 'Voter Fraud'". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 18, 2021. Retrieved September 15, 2024.
362. Gardner, Amy (October 13, 2018). "GOP claims of voter fraud threat fuel worries about ballot access in November". Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved September 15, 2024. Matt Dunlap, the Democratic secretary of state of Maine who served on Trump's commission, said in an interview that he now views the effort as a sham. He accused Republicans of trying to gin up anti-immigration sentiment by falsely claiming that voting by undocumented immigrants is rampant.
     'It's a dog whistle, no question about it,' Dunlap said. 'Whenever we talk about illegal immigration, voter fraud, others taking something away from us – of course it's a dog whistle.'
363. Murphy, Paul P.; Holmes, Kristen; Herb, Jeremy (October 8, 2020). "Trump campaign's training tapes for poll watchers don't always align with Trump's rhetoric". CNN. Retrieved September 15, 2024. Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford said poll watching is completely legal in Nevada but poll watchers must sign an affidavit that they agree not to talk to voters. Poll watchers are not supposed to intimidate voters in any way, he said.
     Ford called Trump's comments at the debate a 'dog whistle to voters for voter intimidation.'
364. Shephard, Alex (October 17, 2016). "Donald Trump is going to blame losing the election on voter fraud, which isn't real". The New Republic. ISSN   0028-6583. Archived from the original on September 15, 2024. Retrieved September 15, 2024.
365. Hsu, Tiffany; Thompson, Stuart A.; Myers, Steven Lee (January 9, 2024). "Elections and Disinformation Are Colliding Like Never Before in 2024". New York Times. Archived from the original on September 2, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. Among the biggest sources of disinformation in elections campaigns are autocratic governments seeking to discredit democracy as a global model of governance...
     Calls to pre-emptively stop voter fraud – which historically is statistically insignificant – recently trended on such platforms, according to Pyrra, a company that monitors threats and misinformation.

     The 'prevalence and acceptance of these narratives is only gaining traction,' even directly influencing electoral policy and legislation, Pyrra found in a case study.

     'These conspiracies are taking root amongst the political elite, who are using these narratives to win public favor while degrading the transparency, checks and balances of the very system they are meant to uphold,' the company's researchers wrote.
366. Bond, Shannon; Park, Miles (November 10, 2023). "Why the fight to counter false election claims may be harder in 2024". NPR.
367. Bensinger, Ken; Fausset, Richard (September 7, 2024). "Heritage Foundation Spreads Deceptive Videos About Noncitizen Voters". New York Times. The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, has said that 'noncitizens don't illegally vote in detectable numbers.'
368. Levy, Pema (October 24, 2024). "The dark money behind the plot to overturn the election". Mother Jones. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
369. "FBI: China, Russia Amplifying Election Misinformation". GovTech. October 4, 2022. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
370. Latschan, Thomas. "Is Russia trying to influence the US election? – DW – 09/10/2024". dw.com. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024. The Russian tool kit for interference is believed to be extensive, according to CeMAS.
     In an unspecified European election in 2020, campaigners were allegedly intimidated. And in 2020 and 2021, Russian state media is said to have massively disseminated false allegations of electoral fraud in democratic elections around the world...

     According to the US intelligence report from October 2023, Russia is ultimately pursuing two goals: to portray democratic elections as untrustworthy, and delegitimize the elected governments that run them.
371. Margolin, Josh; Bruggeman, Lucien (September 3, 2020). "Russia is 'amplifying' claims of mail-in voter fraud, intel bulletin warns". ABC News. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
372. Hasen, Richard L. (2020). "Chapter 3". Election meltdown: dirty tricks, distrust, and the threat to American democracy. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-24819-7.
373. Montlake, Simon (August 28, 2024). "Will the 2024 election results be accepted by all? Wisconsin is a key test". Christian Science Monitor. ISSN   0882-7729. Archived from the original on September 7, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
374. Gardner, Amy; Arnsdorf, Isaac (July 11, 2024). "GOP jump-starts 2024 election challenges with Trump-inspired lawsuits". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved September 4, 2024.
375. "Trump says he'll accept 2024 results if they're 'fair and legal' while airing false 2020 fraud claims". NBC News. June 28, 2024. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved September 4, 2024.
376. "Democrats grow concerned Republicans are planting seeds with legal suits to overturn a Trump defeat". NBC News. September 1, 2024. Archived from the original on September 5, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
377. Cohen, Marshall (April 12, 2024). "How Speaker Johnson helped Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election | CNN Politics". CNN. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
378. Stone, Peter (September 3, 2024). "Trump and allies plant seeds for 'chaos and discord' if he loses, experts warn". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
379. "The Coming Election Battles". New York Times. September 5, 2024. Archived from the original on September 5, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024. But the likeliest source of trouble at the moment is Georgia, which embodies Republicans' two-pronged approach: They've set up new hurdles to voting and a process to stall – or even outright avoid – certifying the results if Trump loses.
380. "How false fraud claims are eroding integrity of American election system". PBS News. October 7, 2021. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
381. Hasen, Richard L. (January 25, 2024). "Opinion | I'm an Election Law Expert. Here's What I Fear Most in 2024". Politico.
382. Berlinski, Nicolas; Doyle, Margaret; Guess, Andrew M.; Levy, Gabrielle; Lyons, Benjamin; Montgomery, Jacob M.; Nyhan, Brendan; Reifler, Jason (2023). "The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections". Journal of Experimental Political Science. 10 (1): 34–49. doi:10.1017/XPS.2021.18. hdl: 10871/126301 . ISSN   2052-2630. Using a nationwide survey experiment conducted after the 2018 midterm elections – a time when many prominent Republicans also made unsubstantiated fraud claims – we show that exposure to claims of voter fraud reduces confidence in electoral integrity, though not support for democracy itself. The effects are concentrated among Republicans and Trump approvers. Worryingly, corrective messages from mainstream sources do not measurably reduce the damage these accusations inflict.
383. Swenson, Ali; Smith, Michelle R. (December 6, 2023). "Trump tells supporters, 'Guard the vote.' Here's the phrase's backstory and why it's raising concern". AP News. Archived from the original on September 10, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
384. "Judges punishing Jan. 6 rioters say they fear more political violence as Election Day nears". AP News. October 19, 2024. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
385. "Democrats grow concerned Republicans are planting seeds with legal suits to overturn a Trump defeat". NBC News. September 1, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
386. Gardner, Amy; Itkowitz, Colby; Alfaro, Mariana (September 9, 2024). "Trump pledges to jail opponents, baselessly suggests election will be stolen from him". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved September 9, 2024.
387. Cassidy, Christina A. (September 17, 2024). "From panic buttons to bulletproof glass, U.S. election officials are preparing for threats". Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 18, 2024. Retrieved September 18, 2024– via PBS News.
388. Corasaniti, Nick; Berzon, Alexandra (September 18, 2024). "Trump's Talk of Prosecution Rattles Election Officials". New York Times. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 19, 2024.
389. Cameron, Dell (October 17, 2024). "DHS Warns Law Enforcement Election Deniers May Attempt to Bomb Drop Boxes". Wired. ISSN   1059-1028 . Retrieved October 18, 2024.
390. Davis, Wynne (November 4, 2022). "What is voter intimidation and how concerned should you be?". NPR. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024. While voter intimidation is always illegal and a concern during election season, there are some differences in 2022 from the presidential election in 2020. A lot of the differences stem from the disinformation and false claims that the 2020 election was stolen, Morales-Doyle said.
391. Morse, Clara Ence (May 9, 2024). "Noncitizen voting is extremely rare. Republicans are focusing on it anyway". Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 6, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024. But experts say the Republican spotlight on the issue glosses over two crucial facts: Noncitizen voting is exceedingly rare, and it is already banned in almost all places, including the ones with ballot measures in November. That hasn't stopped Republicans from making the issue a frequent talking point. The unfounded threat brings together two issues Republicans believe will drive turnout with their base: illegal immigration and election fraud claims. Critics warn that attempts to crack down on noncitizen voting could suppress the votes of Latino voters who fear being wrongly accused of illegally casting ballots. They say they could also lead to database mismatches that push legitimate voters off the rolls.
392. Duignan, Brian (October 12, 2024). "Voter suppression | Definition, History, Examples, Bills, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved October 19, 2024.
393. Morgan, David; Goudsward, Andrew (September 19, 2024). "Even before election, Trump, allies sue over claims that non-citizens might vote". Reuters. 'It's not happening,' said Chuck Coughlin, a Phoenix-based political strategist who ended his lifelong Republican registration in 2017 and is now an independent. 'It's a MAGA narrative intended to gaslight Republicans about election integrity.'
394. "What methods do states use to prevent election fraud? (2020)". Ballotpedia. 2020. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
395. Wines, Michael (September 6, 2018). "6 Ways to Fight Election Hacking and Voter Fraud, According to an Expert Panel". The New York Times. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
396. "Map: 29 million Americans live under new voter ID laws put in place since 2020". NBC News. March 12, 2024. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
397. "7 voices sound off on NC's controversial voter ID law". PBS News. October 4, 2015. Retrieved September 4, 2024. Since 2011, 15 states – mostly Republican-controlled – have passed laws requiring voters to present a government-issued photo ID at the polls in order to be able to vote.
398. "Voter ID". National Conference of State Legislatures . Retrieved September 15, 2016.
399. Cillizza, Chris (June 25, 2021). "Analysis: Voter ID requirements are really popular. So why are they so divisive?". CNN. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
400. Rakich, Nathaniel (April 2, 2021). "Americans Oppose Many Voting Restrictions – But Not Voter ID Laws". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved September 1, 2024. Indeed, voter ID laws – which Republicans have pushed for years – are quite popular in general.
401. Schouten, Fredreka; Shelton, Shania (May 2, 2023). "Republican-controlled states target college students' voting power ahead of high-stakes 2024 elections". CNN. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
402. "Post-Election Audit Report: General Election 2016" (PDF). North Carolina State Board of Elections. April 21, 2017. p. Appendix Pages 1–2. Also, due to timing issues and the fact that DMV data is generally updated only when licenses are issued, DMV data alone is not reliable for this purpose either...
     If SAVE indicates a voter is a non-citizen, NCSBE opens a case file and attempts to contact the voter to determine citizenship status through mailings and interviews. Because of the unreliability of citizenship data, voters who appear to be non-citizens – where both data sources indicate non-citizenship status – are not removed from the rolls, absent independent confirmation that they are not citizens. In fact, approximately three-quarters of those who subsequently provide proof of U.S. citizenship continued to appear as non-citizens in the SAVE database.
403. Sherman, Amy. "Do states verify citizenship of voters in federal elections?". PolitiFact . Retrieved September 1, 2024. Cases of noncitizens voting are statistically rare. Some noncitizens accidentally end up on voter rolls when applying for drivers' licenses.
404. Robison, Mark (December 15, 2022). "Voter applications by noncitizens unlikely to be detected". Reno Gazette-Journal. Retrieved October 15, 2024.
405. Lempert, Julianne; Orey, Rachel; Weil, Matthew (July 10, 2024). "Blog: Five Things to Know About the SAVE Act". Bipartisan Policy Center. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
406. Levine, Sam (June 12, 2024). "Millions of US voters lack access to documents to prove citizenship". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved September 10, 2024.
407. Who Lacks ID in America Today? An Exploration of Voter ID Access, Barriers, and Knowledge (June 2024)
408. "House passes bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote, fanning a GOP election-year talking point". AP News. July 10, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024– via PBS News. The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration, a proposal Republicans have prioritized as an election-year talking point even as research shows noncitizens illegally registering and casting ballots in federal elections is exceptionally rare.
409. Sievers, Caitlin (August 22, 2024). "SCOTUS: Arizona may require proof of citizenship on state voter forms, at least for now". Arizona Mirror. Retrieved September 9, 2024. "Unlike voter ID laws, that often have not been shown to have a big effect on turnout, these documentary proof of citizenship laws matter a lot," Hasen wrote. "They stand to literally disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters for no good reason."
410. Morris, Kevin; Henry, Cora (June 11, 2024). "Millions of Americans Don't Have Documents Proving Their Citizenship Readily Available". Brennan Center For Justice. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
411. Who Lacks ID in America Today? An Exploration of Voter ID Access, Barriers, and Knowledge (June 2024)
412. Wang, Hansi Lo (June 11, 2024). "1 in 10 eligible U.S. voters say they can't easily show proof of their citizenship". NPR.
413. Leingang, Rachel (July 10, 2024). "US House to vote on bill to require proof of citizenship to vote despite no evidence of non-citizen ballots". The Guardian. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
414. Totenberg, Nina (June 17, 2013). "Supreme Court Strikes Down Arizona Voting Law". NPR.
415. Wang, Hansi Lo (August 22, 2024). "Supreme Court grants GOP bid to require citizenship proof for some Arizona voters". NPR. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
416. Millhiser, Ian (August 22, 2024). "The Supreme Court decides not to disenfranchise thousands of swing state voters". Vox. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
417. Seariac, Hanna (August 28, 2024). "The SAVE Act explained". Deseret News. Retrieved September 11, 2024.
418. Morin, Rebecca (July 11, 2024). "House pass bill to block noncitizens from voting". USA TODAY. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
419. McCarthy, Mia (October 13, 2024). "Johnson doesn't expect another Jan. 6. But he still has doubts about election integrity". Politico.
420. Parton, Jon (July 13, 2024). "Judge Strikes Down Kansas Voter ID Law, Sanctions Kris Kobach". Courthouse News Service. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
421. Robinson, Julie A. (June 18, 2018). "Findings of fact and conclusions of law in Fish v. Kobach, Case No. 16-2105-JAR-JPO, and Bednasek and Kobach, Case No. 15-9300-JAR-JPO (published 2018-06-18 with corrections 2018-06-19)" (PDF). US District Court for the District of Kansas. Retrieved June 28, 2018.
422. Huseman, Jessica (June 19, 2018). "How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested – and Utterly Failed". ProPublica. Retrieved September 8, 2024. Dismissing the testimony by Kobach's witnesses as unpersuasive, Robinson drew what she called 'the more obvious conclusion that there is no iceberg; only an icicle largely created by confusion and administrative error.'...But the judge's opinion and expert interviews reveal that Kobach effectively put the concept of mass voter fraud to the test – and the evidence crumbled.
423. "Court: Kansas can't require voters to show citizenship proof". AP News. April 29, 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
424. Kasprak, Alex (May 26, 2024). "'10 to 27%' of Noncitizens in US Are Illegally Registered to Vote?". Snopes. Retrieved September 13, 2024. '[The CES] is not designed to be a sample of noncitizen adults and therefore it is not fit for the purpose of studying that subset of respondents...'There are much better ways to analyze whether noncitizens register to vote,' Schaffner told Snopes. These methods, some of which Richman used in his recent expert reports, involve looking voter rolls and other state records to identify any individuals who appear to be noncitizens. Studies like these, including the Richman expert reports, 'overwhelmingly resulted in finding very few noncitizens registered to vote,' Schaffner told Snopes.
425. "The Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS) 2016 Comprehensive Report" (PDF). Election Assistance Commission. June 28, 2017. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
426. "Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS) 2018 Comprehensive report" (PDF). Election Assistance Commission. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
427. Buchanan, Larry; Parlapiano, Alicia (October 7, 2020). "Two of These Mail Ballot Signatures Are by the Same Person. Which Ones?". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved August 31, 2024.
428. "Table 14: How States Verify Voted Absentee/Mail Ballots". National Conference of State Legislatures. January 22, 2024. Archived from the original on July 16, 2024. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
429. Taddonio, Patrice (October 20, 2020). "How Associating Mail-in Ballots with Voter Fraud Became a Political Tool". FRONTLINE. Archived from the original on September 25, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2024. A more pervasive problem, experts say, is disenfranchisement caused by the proportion of mail-in ballots that are discarded on technicalities
430. Beall, Pat (October 29, 2020). "2020 Election Could Hinge on Whose Votes Don't Count". FRONTLINE. Retrieved September 26, 2024.
431. Cohen, Marshall; Brown, Pamela; Cohen, Zachary; Abou-Ghazala, Yahya (October 30, 2024). "Chinese citizen charged with illegally voting in Michigan, authorities say". CNN. Retrieved October 31, 2024. Experts said this is a standard election procedure to maintain secrecy. "An in-person ballot is placed in a tabulator or ballot box, intermingled with other ballots. This is to preserve secrecy, so you can't go into the ballot later and confirm who a particular parson voted for," said David Becker, a former Justice Department voting rights official and founder of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research.
432. Loe, Megan (October 24, 2024). "In many states, poll workers can write on ballots without disqualifying them". kgw.com. Retrieved October 31, 2024.
433. Blackmon, Chyna (October 30, 2024). "Yes, your ballot will still count if an election worker writes on it. Here's why". Charlotte Observer. Retrieved October 31, 2024. Election workers write an identifying number on the ballots of voters who vote by mail or during the in-person early voting period. This is a special number assigned to each ballot and voter. "This number allows the ballot to be retrieved and not counted if necessary due to a voter challenge, such as if the voter dies before Election Day or votes more than once," the State Board of Elections said in a recent press release.
434. "Post-Election Audits". National Conference of State Legislatures. March 26, 2024. Archived from the original on July 18, 2024. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
435. "States removed 17 million voters from rolls in two years, government agency says". NBC News. June 27, 2019. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
436. Roth, Zachary (March 30, 2020). "The Caged Ballot". The New Republic. ISSN   0028-6583 . Retrieved September 3, 2024.
437. Ingraham, Christopher (July 20, 2017). "This anti-voter-fraud program gets it wrong over 99 percent of the time. The GOP wants to take it nationwide". Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
438. Hegeman, Roxana (December 10, 2019). "Multistate voter database suspended in lawsuit settlement". Associated Press. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
439. Moomaw, Graham (September 20, 2023). "After ERIC withdrawal, Virginia strikes deals with 6 states to share voter data". Virginia Mercury . Retrieved August 28, 2024.
440. Underhill, Wendy (June 20, 2023). "More Withdrawals From Voter Data Group ERIC Likely". NCSL. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
441. Vigdor, Neil (March 7, 2023). "G.O.P. States Abandon Group That Helps Fight Voter Fraud". The New York Times. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
442. Parks, Miles (October 20, 2023). "Republican states swore off a voting tool. Now they're scrambling to recreate it". NPR. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
443. Pirius, Rebecca (September 11, 2020). "Voter Fraud and Election Fraud Explained". CriminalDefenseLawyer (NOLO). Retrieved September 8, 2024.
444. Huseman, Jessica (June 19, 2018). "How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested – and Utterly Failed". ProPublica. Retrieved September 8, 2024. Minnite stopped him. 'The word 'fraud' has meaning, and that meaning is that there's intent behind it. And that's actually what Kansas laws are with respect to illegal voting,'
445. Bousquet, Steve (October 19, 2016). "The bogeyman at the ballot box: Voter fraud in Florida is largely a myth". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved October 25, 2024. The Furqan case illustrates that cases of voter fraud are not only rare but hard to prove.
446. Fessler, Pam (March 15, 2007). "Voter Fraud: A Tough Crime to Prove". NPR . Retrieved September 7, 2024. Allegations of voter fraud are not only difficult to prove, they're likely to prompt bipartisan debate.
447. "Election Crimes: An Initial Review and Recommendations for Future Study" (PDF). U.S. Election Assistance Commission. December 2006. Retrieved October 25, 2024. In some states, enforcement is left to the county or district attorney, and in others enforcement is managed by the state's attorney general. Regardless, voting fraud and voter intimidation are difficult to prove and require resources and time that many local law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies do not have.
448. Siegelbaum, Max (September 23, 2016). "Colorado investigating potential fraud after news report of "dead voters"". The Denver Post. Retrieved September 8, 2024. The El Paso County District Attorney is currently investigating the Sosa cases, but these kinds of cases are difficult to prosecute.
449. Killian, Joe (December 21, 2018). "Documents: Federal prosecutors knew of Bladen County voting allegations, but took no action • NC Newsline". NC Newsline. Retrieved November 2, 2024. But the political will has to be there, Hall said – especially in complicated cases like the one in the 9th District, where there are many moving pieces, multiple potential offenders and a long history of apparent violations. "Sometimes it's hard to get that smoking gun in some cases," Hall said. "So I think they look at the easier thing – somebody who was on probation and they didn't realize they couldn't vote and they tried to. They pursue that, they prosecute that, they make a big deal out of that."
450. Liberto, Jennifer (August 28, 2005). "Vote illegally, get caught: What happens? Very little". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved November 2, 2024.
451. Watch, Matt Mencarini / Wisconsin (March 9, 2023). "Election fraud in Wisconsin: The most common reason for charges". Wisconsin Watch. Retrieved September 10, 2024.
452. Ingalls, Chris (November 22, 2022). "Criminal charges for vote fraud? That depends on where you live in Washington state". king5.com. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
453. Elliott, Justin; Faturechi, Robert (October 7, 2020). "DOJ Frees Federal Prosecutors to Take Steps That Could Interfere With Elections, Weakening Long-standing Policy". ProPublica . Retrieved September 12, 2024.
454. Pilger, Richard C. (December 2017). "Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses Eighth Edition". United States Department of Justice . Retrieved September 12, 2024. [A public investigation] runs the obvious risk of chilling legitimate voting and campaign activities. It also runs the significant risk of interjecting the investigation itself as an issue, both in the campaign and in the adjudication of any ensuing election contest.
455. Mulroy, Steven J. (October 1, 2021). "Baby & Bathwater: Standing in Election Cases After 2020". Dickinson Law Review . 126 (1): 9–68. Retrieved October 18, 2024. ... Many courts were too quick to rule that plaintiffs lacked standing ... election cases raise unique standing challenges, because the asserted harms are often diffused ... With the exception of candidate plaintiffs ... it is harder in election cases to identify parties that are uniquely and concretely harmed by violations of fair election principles than it is in the normal way we think of standing harms.
456. Stephanopoulos, Nicholas O. (October 29, 2021). "The New Vote Dilution" (PDF). NYU Law Review. 96: 1179–1213. Retrieved October 18, 2024. In a barrage of lawsuits about the 2020 election, conservative plaintiffs argued that electoral policies that make it easier to vote are unconstitutionally dilutive. Their logic was that (1) these policies enable fraud through their lack of proper safeguards and (2) the resulting fraudulent votes dilute the ballots cast by law-abiding citizens.
457. Marisam, Jason (March 26, 2024). "Fraudulent Vote Dilution". Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum. 2 (2). Retrieved October 18, 2024. In 2020, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign brought a series of lawsuits that advanced a novel type of voting claim, which this Article calls fraudulent vote dilution. This claim asserts that an election rule is unconstitutional because it makes it too easy to cast fraudulent ballots that, when tabulated, will dilute the strength of valid and honest ballots. While these claims were not successful in 2020, in the years since, fraudulent vote dilution theories have gained some traction in federal district courts.

External links

• Electoral fraud on Ballotpedia
• Votebeat, nonpartisan news site covering election-related issues