True the Vote

Last updated

True the Vote
True the Vote logo (1).png
FormationNovember 30, 2009;12 years ago (2009-11-30) [1]
FounderCatherine Engelbrecht
PurposePreventing voter fraud
Headquarters Houston, Texas, U.S.
Official language

True the Vote (TTV) is a conservative [2] [3] vote-monitoring organization based in Houston, Texas whose stated objective is stopping voter fraud. The organization supports voter ID laws [4] and trains volunteers to be election monitors and to spot and bring attention to suspicious voter registrations that its volunteers believe delegitimize voter eligibility. True the Vote's current president is Catherine Engelbrecht.


Americans for Prosperity and other Republican-leaning independent groups have sponsored meetings featuring speakers from the group, including Engelbrecht. [5]


Founder Catherine Engelbrecht Catherine Engelbrecht 01.png
Founder Catherine Engelbrecht

True the Vote is an offshoot of the King Street Patriots, a nonprofit Tea Party organization founded by Engelbrecht [5] and active mostly in Texas. Several members of the King Street Patriots, including Engelbrecht, its president, were dissatisfied with the voting process in Harris County, Texas, during the 2008 election, especially the shortage of poll workers, which they believed "invited fraud and other problems at the polls," [6] and they founded the second group in mid-2009. [7]

2010 election cycle

In August 2010, Harris County Voter Registrar Leo Vasquez told ABC news (Houston affiliate KTRK), "We have evidence indicating violations of the Texas election code, falsified documents being submitted to this governmental office and possibly violations of federal election laws." His office's investigation found 1,597 instances of multiple applications for the same voter, 1,014 applications for folks already registered to vote, 325 for teenagers who are too young to register and 25 from folks who admitted on the application they are not even US citizens. Vasquez said all the applications were gathered by paid deputies with the group Houston Votes.[ clarification needed ] Of the 25,000 applications the group filed in the months of June, July, and August 2010, only 7,193 were actually for new voters. [8]

True the Vote's activities during the 2010 election cycle were largely confined to Harris County, Texas.[ citation needed ] True the Vote asserted that it uncovered numerous examples of voter fraud, stating, for example: "Vacant lots had several voters registered on them. An eight-bed halfway house had more than 40 voters registered at its address. During the election, the Texas Democratic Party accused True the Vote of voter intimidation in largely Hispanic and African-American polling areas." [9]

2011–12 Wisconsin recall effort

In 2012, True the Vote joined several other Tea Party groups in "Verify the Recall", an effort that opposed the attempted recall of Wisconsin governor Scott Walker in the Wisconsin gubernatorial recall election. True the Vote provided software that it had previously applied to check signatures in petitions in Texas. [10] In order to electronically check over 1 million petition signatures, which had previously been posted online by the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, [11] True the Vote recruited 17,000 volunteers [7] (mostly out of state) to manually enter signatures into True the Vote's electronic database. True the Vote says it recruited over 13,000 volunteers. [12] True the Vote's website has run at least two stories suggesting that fraud is "rampant" in the recall effort, and frame the effort as decidedly political, saying that "we should not believe the claims of union-supporters and anti-Walker operatives who say that they collected more than one million signatures on petitions to recall Governor Scott Walker.". [13]

On February 28, Walker called for the data gathered by the "Verify the Recall" effort to be used as an official challenge of the recall. [14] This information was gathered and compiled entirely by True the Vote. True the Vote's executive summary contended that only 534,865 signatures gathered during the recall effort were valid. [15] Ultimately the Government Accountability Board ruled that about 900,000 signatures were valid. [16] The New York Times and PR Watch reported apparent systematic errors in True the Vote's signature verification methods. [16] [17]

In the days before the June 5, 2012 recall election, True the Vote announced that it would be training volunteers to monitor polling places throughout Wisconsin, both online [18] and at a small number of locations throughout the state [19] True the Vote stated that hundreds of people showed up for training and later monitored the polls in Wisconsin, [20] and that these monitors were necessary because of "discrepancies" in the recall petition process as well as "Wisconsin’s long history of election fraud." True the Vote pledged to man every polling place in Wisconsin on the day of the recall election, which drew sharp criticism from the Barret campaign. [21]

Throughout the Wisconsin recall, True the Vote worked in concert with a group of local Tea Party groups including the "Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty" and "We the People of the Republic", which helped True the Vote launch its recall signature verification efforts. [22]

Congressional investigation, 2012

In October 2012, Rep. Elijah Cummings, a Maryland Democrat, initiated an investigation into alleged voter suppression by True the Vote. Cummings wrote a letter to Engelbrecht, raising questions about voter challenges in Ohio, North Carolina, Wisconsin and Maryland. He indicated that if the efforts to challenge voter registrations were "intentional, politically motivated and widespread across multiple states, they could amount to a criminal conspiracy to deny legitimate voters their constitutional rights." [23] In February 2014, True The Vote filed complaints against Cummings including charges of ethics violations after Internal Revenue Service (IRS) emails released by the House Oversight Committee showed staff working for Democratic Ranking Member Elijah Cummings communicated with the IRS multiple times between 2012 and 2013 about True the Vote. Prior to this revelation, Cummings had maintained that at no time was he nor his staff in communication with IRS officials regarding True the Vote. Information contained within the emails show that the IRS and Cummings' staff asked for nearly identical information from True the Vote President Catherine Engelbrecht about her organization, implying coordination and improper sharing between the two groups of confidential taxpayer information.

Alleged forgery of signatures in Ohio

In 2012, True the Vote applied to the Franklin County Board of Elections (FCBOE) in Ohio to place polling observers in Columbus area districts with large African-American populations. A November 6, 2012, news report in the Cleveland Leader stated that the FCBOE had determined that five of the six signatures on the application were likely forged. [24] Because this type of fraud is a fifth degree felony, the FCBOE declared that an investigation would be conducted after the election. [24]

Catherine Engelbrecht responded to the allegations by saying that the signatures on the initial form were genuine, and, following Franklin County instructions, were copied onto subsequent forms. She said that prior to the placement of observers, the candidates rescinded their approval following threats of lawsuits. Engelbrecht said that the allegation of forgery was "blatant slander", and that William Anthony, the director of the FCBOE, was formerly the chairman of the county Democratic Party. She requested that Anthony release the timeline of events surrounding the allegations and clarify whether there was any coordination with the Democratic Party. [25]

Other activity, 2011–12

On December 13, 2011, it held a rally in Austin, Texas to support a stricter ID law passed earlier that year. [26] The organization held a national summit in Houston largely centered on charges of voter fraud. Speakers included ACORN whistle-blower Anita Moncrief, Hans Von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation, who insisted that "United States has a long history of voter fraud that has been documented by historians and journalists," and President Jimmy Carter's pollster and Fox News contributor Pat Caddell, who called opposition to voter ID Laws "the demise of our democracy" and "Slow motion suicide." [27]


In February 2013, True the Vote filed a federal lawsuit against St. Lucie County elections supervisor Gertrude Walker in Florida, claiming that she had failed to turn over public records related to the US House of Representatives election race between Allen West (R) and Patrick Murphy (D): The latter had won by a margin of 2,429 votes. [28] They stated that withholding the documents violated the 1993 Motor Voter Law, which grants them permission to "publicly inspect and examine all voter registration and election records" in question. [29]

In May 2013, it was revealed that True the Vote was one of the groups allegedly subjected to additional scrutiny by the IRS in applying for tax-exempt status. [30] [31]

According to the National Review, since founding True the Vote, Engelbrecht and her husband say they and their business, Engelbrecht Manufacturing, have also been investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Englebrecht has stated that she "absolutely" thinks she was targeted because she "worked against voter fraud." [32]

On May 21, 2013, the organization filed a lawsuit in the District of Columbia against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over claims that the agency delayed the determination process for its application for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, publicly claiming, "We’ve been waiting for three years to receive a decision from the IRS about our tax exempt status. After answering hundreds of questions and producing thousands of documents, we’re done waiting. The IRS does not have the power to pocket veto our application. Federal law empowers groups like True the Vote to force a decision in court – which is precisely what we aim to do." [33]

In July 2013, Mother Jones said that the magazine had obtained documents indicating that Engelbrecht was a member of the Groundswell Group, a conservative group of journalists and activists that meet secretly to stay consistent on messaging. The group includes Virginia Thomas, wife of US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, along with journalists from the National Review, Breitbart News, and the Washington Examiner. [34]


On February 6, 2014, Engelbrecht testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee at a hearing about the IRS's targetings. [35] She alleged that ranking member Elijah Cummings had acted to "demonize and intimidate" her organization by sending it letters that duplicated IRS requests and by appearing on cable news to "publicly defame" her and True the Vote. [36] Based on those allegations, Engelbrecht filed a formal ethics complaint against Cummings.[ citation needed ]

In September 2014, TTV celebrated U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder's intention to resign his position stating, "It is our hope that Mr. Holder's announcement marks an end to the radical, racialist assault on voters' rights across America." [37]

In October 2014, True the Vote's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service in response to the IRS targeting scandal was dismissed in the Washington D.C. District Court. [38] The organization announced on December 18 that it had filed a notice of appeal for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [39]

In November 2014, the organization denounced President Barack Obama's executive order for deferred action on deportations, claiming the move would cause an "intentional overwhelm" of state agencies and would potentially compromise voter rolls. [40] True the Vote attacked a presidential nominee for the U.S. Election Assistance Commission in a fundraising letter dated December 19, 2014, labeling Matthew S. Butler a "book burner" for having recently served as the CEO of Media Matters for America. [41]


In January 2015, True the Vote Founder Catherine Engelbrecht was called before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary during the confirmation hearing for Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch, where she questioned whether the proposed change in leadership would affect the larger Justice Department: "Attorney General Eric Holder has created a radical, racialist agency that metes out social justice on an as-needed basis to promote the advancement of a progressive agenda. Will Ms. Lynch follow in his footsteps or, will she turn in a new direction?" [42]


On November 25, 2020, less than a month after having provided them with a $2.5 million donation, North Carolina money manager Fred Eshelman sued True The Vote for failing to provide him with information about the progress of their Validate the Vote 2020 initiative and failing to achieve the aims of this initiative. [43] [44] [45] The suit was first filed in federal court, then later withdrawn and re-filed in Texas state court. In April 2021 the suit was dismissed for lack of standing. [46] [47]

Validate the Vote is a True the Vote initiative launched shortly after the 2020 U.S. presidential election and led by Engelbrecht, described in a press release as intended to provide that the 2020 election reflected the principle of "one vote for one voter," and aimed to protect the integrity of the US electoral system and ensure public confidence and acceptance of election outcomes critical to American democracy. [48] Validate the Vote pursued several strategies, among them finding whistleblower witnesses to election wrongdoing, data analysis to find irregularities, and lawsuits to obtain access to voter rolls. After failing to persuade Trump's legal team to join its legal strategy, True the Vote withdrew its lawsuits on November 16. None of its strategies produced evidence of significant problems with the election. [46] Engelbrecht has stated that, as of February 2021, the group's investigations were "ongoing" . [46]


In May 2022, Dinesh D'Souza released 2000 Mules , a film alleging Democrat-aligned individuals were paid to illegally collect and deposit ballots into drop boxes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during the 2020 presidential election. The film was based on research by True the Vote. Former president Donald Trump repeated his false claim of a stolen election when he praised the film as exposing "great election fraud". [49]

National Public Radio (NPR) stated: "A conservative 'election integrity' group called True The Vote has made multiple misleading or false claims about its work, NPR has found, including the suggestion that they helped solve the murder of an eight-year-old girl in Atlanta. The claims appear in a new pro-Trump film called "2,000 Mules..." NPR stated that True the Vote's claim they "solved a murder of a young little girl in Atlanta" was false. [50] Analysis conducted by the Associated Press (AP) found the film was "based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data". [49] [51] The AP explained that in various swing counties across the five states, True the Vote used phone pings to cellphone towers to identify individuals who had passed near ballot drop boxes and various unnamed nonprofit organizations multiple times per day, concluding that such people were paid mules for ballot collection and deposits. Experts said such mobile phone tracking was not accurate enough to distinguish alleged mules from many other people who might walk or drive by a ballot box or nonprofit during the course of a day, such as delivery drivers, postal workers and cab drivers. True the Vote asserted it had conducted "pattern of life" filtering of such people prior to the election season, though the AP noted limitations of that approach.

The film also asserted that some of the geolocated alleged mules were also present at what it called "antifa riots" in Atlanta during the George Floyd protests in summer 2020, though AP explained that the geolocation data also could not reliably determine why people were present at that event; they could have been peaceful protesters, police or firefighters responding to the protests, or business owners in the area. D'Souza and Gregg Phillips, a True the Vote board member, asserted they had matched their geolocation data with data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED). In the film, Phillips claimed "dozens and dozens and dozens of our mules show up on the ACLED databases" as what were characterized as "antifa rioters". ACLED said the claims were categorically false, noting it does not track cellphone data. True the Vote's leader Catherine Engelbrecht asserted Phillips was actually referring to a different organization, then he mentioned ACLED, but she declined to name the different organization, saying Phillips relied on "multiple databases". [50]

To illustrate the use of phone geolocation technology, in the film D'Souza speaks with Phillips, who alleged he used it to identify two suspects in an Atlanta homicide cold case, providing his analysis to the FBI, which he and D'Souza suggest resulted in arrests of the suspects. The homicide was not a cold case, and both suspects were arrested by state rather than federal officials, with no indication phone geolocation played a role. True the Vote stated days after 2000 Mules was released that it had notified the FBI of its analysis more than two months after the suspects had been indicted. Promoting the film on his podcast, D'Souza said the FBI had forwarded the information to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) and the arrests resulted shortly thereafter, though the GBI denied receiving such information. NPR was unable to confirm that True the Vote had provided analysis to the FBI; Engelbrecht told NPR she would not provide names of any FBI agents she claimed to have contacted "as I do not want them harassed". Phillips had previously claimed without evidence that as many as five million ballots had been illegally cast by non-citizens in the 2016 elections. [50]

Phillips narrates a surveillance video in which a man on a bicycle rides up to a drop box and deposits his ballot. Phillips characterizes the man as "sort of frustrated as he starts to leave," though there was no obvious evidence of frustration, supposedly because the man had forgotten to photograph himself depositing the ballot. Phillips speculated, "they had started requiring the mules, apparently, to take pictures of the stuffing of the ballots. It appears that that's how they get paid." The man later took a photo of his bicycle next to the drop box, leading Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote to ask, "If you're just casting your own ballot, what reason in the world would you have to come back and take a picture of the box?" Elections officials had encouraged voters to share their experiences on social media to boost turnout; images posted on social media included people depositing ballots at that particular drop box. [52]

2000 Mules does not inform viewers that, even if the events it depicts occurred, every absentee ballot deposited in a drop box must be inside an envelope sent to each registered voter that includes the voter's registration information, signature, and a barcode for verification. Ballots lacking the envelope are rejected. True the Vote did not assert any of the ballots involved in the alleged mule scheme were illegal. [53] [54]

The AP reported that the film's assertion that True the Vote identified 1,155 paid mules in Philadelphia alone was false. The film presented a single anonymous witness who said she saw people picking up what she "assumed" to be payments for ballot collection in Arizona; no evidence of payments was presented in any of the other four states. [49] The film presents no evidence that ballots were collected from a nonprofit to be deposited in drop boxes. [52] None of the surveillance videos in the film show any individual dropping off ballots more than once. [55] True the Vote claims about video of multiple drops by an individual, "Some of that footage was shown in the first trailer. It was taken out because the video is extremely poor quality." [56]

True the Vote did not cooperate with investigations by Georgia election officials, refusing to disclose the names of people who allegedly collected ballots. The State Election Board issued subpoenas to the organization in April 2022, seeking documents, recordings and names of individuals involved. [53] The GBI examined the True the Vote allegations in fall 2021 but did not find sufficient evidence to open an investigation. [57]


In October 2010, Ryan J. Reilly, writing for the political news and opinion website Talking Points Memo, criticized True the Vote for engaging in what Reilly said was voter suppression "caging", voter intimidation, and advancing statements about the pervasiveness of voter fraud that he said were unfounded. [58]

In 2012, Democratic Congressman Elijah Cummings opened an investigation into the organization amid its efforts to remove hundreds of students and other voters from registration rolls across the United States in advance of that year's presidential election. Cummings stated, "At some point, an effort to challenge voter registrations by the thousands without any legitimate basis may be evidence of illegal voter suppression. If these efforts are intentional, politically motivated and widespread across multiple states, they could amount to a criminal conspiracy to deny legitimate voters their constitutional rights." [59]

In May 2013, following the IRS targeting controversy, Engelbrecht stated True the Vote was subject to additional scrutiny in applying for tax-exempt status. Engelbrecht said the IRS requested additional information from True the Vote five times, which required thousands of pages of documentation. She said that she spent more than $100,000 in attorney and accountant fees to process the IRS requests. Because of the delay in obtaining tax-exempt status, which lasted for three years, she said True the Vote had to return a $35,000 grant and could not effectively fundraise. In addition to scrutiny by the IRS, the organization was subject to inquiries from the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. "I just kept thinking this can't be happening." Engelbrecht said, "it never ends." [60]

Related Research Articles

2003 California gubernatorial recall election Special election for the governorship of the U.S. state of California

The 2003 California gubernatorial recall election was a special election permitted under California state law. It resulted in voters replacing incumbent Democratic Governor Gray Davis with Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger. The recall effort spanned the latter half of 2003. Seven of the nine previous governors, including Davis, had faced unsuccessful recall attempts.

2004 Washington gubernatorial election Summary of the election and its results

The 2004 Washington gubernatorial election was held on November 2, 2004. The race gained national attention for its legal twists and extremely close finish, among the closest political races in United States election history. Republican Dino Rossi was declared the winner in the initial automated count and again in a subsequent automated recount, but after a second recount done by hand, Democrat Christine Gregoire took the lead by a margin of 129 votes.

2004 Arizona Proposition 200 Ballot measure regarding election procedures

Proposition 200, the "Arizona Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act", was an Arizona state initiative passed in 2004 that basically requires: (a) persons to provide proof of citizenship to register to vote; (b) voters to present a photo identification before receiving a ballot at the polling place; and (c) state and local agencies to verify the identity and eligibility, based on immigration status, of applicants for non-federally mandated public benefits. The proposition also makes it a misdemeanor for public officials to fail to report violations of U.S. immigration law by applicants for those public benefits and permits private lawsuits by any resident to enforce its provisions related to public benefits. The requirement to provide proof of citizenship to register to vote was later ruled invalid in federal court.

2011 Wisconsin Senate recall elections Recall electionsin Wisconsin

Recall elections for nine Wisconsin state senators were held during the summer of 2011; one was held on July 19, and six on August 9, with two more held on August 16. Voters attempted to put 16 state senators up for recall, eight Democrats and eight Republicans, because of the budget bill proposed by Governor Scott Walker and circumstances surrounding it. Republicans targeted Democrats for leaving the state for three weeks to prevent the bill from receiving a vote, while Democrats targeted Republicans for voting to significantly limit public employee collective bargaining. Scholars could cite only three times in American history when more than one state legislator has been recalled at roughly the same time over the same issue.

2012 Wisconsin Senate recall elections Recall elections in Wisconsin

Recall elections for four Wisconsin state senators were held during the spring of 2012. Voters put four state senators up for recall, all Republicans, because of the budget repair bill proposed by Governor Scott Walker and circumstances surrounding it. Democrats targeted Republicans for voting to significantly limit public employee collective bargaining. Scholars could cite only four times in American history when more than one state legislator has been recalled at roughly the same time over the same issue. The recall elections occurred on June 5, with May 8 being the date of the primary election.

IRS targeting controversy Questions of scrutiny based on political themes

In 2013, the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), under the Obama administration, revealed that it had selected political groups applying for tax-exempt status for intensive scrutiny based on their names or political themes. This led to wide condemnation of the agency and triggered several investigations, including a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal probe ordered by United States Attorney General Eric Holder. Conservatives claimed that they were specifically targeted by the IRS, but an exhaustive report released by the Treasury Department's Inspector General in 2017 found that from 2004 to 2013, the IRS used both conservative and liberal keywords to choose targets for further scrutiny.

2013 Colorado recall election

The Colorado recall election of 2013 was a successful effort to recall two Democratic members of the Colorado Senate following their support of new gun control legislation. Initially four politicians were targeted, but sufficient signatures could only be obtained for State Senate President John Morse and State Senator Angela Giron.

Voter suppression in the United States is various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible voters from exercising their right to vote. Where found, such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, gender, age and disability discrimination. Before and during the American Civil War, African-Americans had not been able to vote. After the Civil War, all African-Americans were granted voting rights, causing some Southern Democrats and former Confederate states to institute actions such as poll taxes or language tests that were ostensibly not in contradiction to the U.S. Constitution at the time, but were used to limit and suppress voting access. African Americans' access to registration and voting was often difficult until the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and continues to be a subject of debate. American women did not have a constitutionally protected right to vote until the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, while Native Americans' right to vote was not enacted fully until 1924 with the Indian Citizenship Act. Until 1971, with the passage of the Twenty-sixth Amendment, the minimum voting age in the United states was 21, not 18. A constitutional amendment improving voting accessibility for the elderly and handicapped was passed in 1984. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, as of March 24, 2021, more than 361 bills that would restrict voting access have been introduced in 47 states.

2020 United States presidential election 59th quadrennial U.S. presidential election

The 2020 United States presidential election was the 59th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. The Democratic ticket of former vice president Joe Biden and the junior U.S. senator from California Kamala Harris defeated the incumbent Republican president Donald Trump and incumbent vice president Mike Pence. The election took place against the backdrop of the global COVID-19 pandemic and related recession. It was the first election since 1992, the first in the 21st century, and the fifth in the past 100 years, in which the incumbent president failed to win a second term. The election saw the highest voter turnout by percentage since 1900, with each of the two main tickets receiving more than 74 million votes, surpassing Barack Obama's record of 69.5 million votes from 2008. Biden received more than 81 million votes, the most votes ever cast for a candidate in a U.S. presidential election.

Voter impersonation, also sometimes called in-person voter fraud, is a form of electoral fraud in which a person who is eligible to vote in an election votes more than once, or a person who is not eligible to vote does so by voting under the name of an eligible voter. In the United States, voter ID laws have been enacted in a number of states by Republican legislatures and governors since 2010 with the purported aim of preventing voter impersonation. Existing research and evidence shows that voter impersonation is extremely rare. Between 2000 and 2014, there were only 31 documented instances of voter impersonation. There is no evidence that it has changed the result of any election. In April 2020, a voter fraud study covering 20 years by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of mail-in ballot fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 percent" of instances nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent — about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning in the United States."

2016 United States presidential election recounts

Following Republican nominee Donald Trump's presumed electoral college victory in the United States presidential election of 2016, a group of computer scientists, cyber security experts, and election monitors raised concerns about the integrity of the election results. They urged the campaign staff of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who had conceded the campaign on November 9, to petition for a recount in three key states: Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. When the Clinton campaign declined to file for recounts, Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein agreed to spearhead the recount effort on November 23, on the grounds that unspecified "anomalies" may have affected the election's outcome. The Clinton team subsequently pledged to support the recount efforts "in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides." President-elect Trump and his supporters filed legal motions in all three states to prevent the recounts. Two other states were the subject of recount bids that were separate from Stein's efforts in the Rust Belt states: American Delta Party/Reform Party presidential candidate Rocky De La Fuente filed for a partial recount in Nevada on November 30, and three Florida citizens filed for a complete hand recount in their state on December 6.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is an American conservative legal group based in Indianapolis, Indiana, which is known for suing states and local governments to purge voters from election rolls. The nonprofit was constituted in 2012.

Ashley Moody American politician and lawyer

Ashley Brooke Moody is an American attorney and politician serving as the Florida attorney general since January 2019.

Postal voting in the United States Overview of postal voting in the United States of America

Postal voting in the United States, also referred to as mail-in voting or vote by mail, is a form of absentee ballot in the United States, in which a ballot is mailed to the home of a registered voter, who fills it out and returns it by postal mail or drops it off in-person at a secure drop box or voting center. Postal voting reduces staff requirements at polling centers during an election. All-mail elections can save money, while a mix of voting options can cost more. In some states, ballots may be sent by the Postal Service without prepayment of postage.

After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost at least 63 lawsuits contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Among the judges who dismissed the lawsuits were some appointed by Trump himself.

The following is a timeline of major events before, during, and after the 2020 United States presidential election, the 59th quadrennial United States presidential election, from November 2020 to January 2021. For prior events, see Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election (2017–2019) and Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election.

The Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the election processes of Nevada. Many of the processes contested were created due to the COVID-19 pandemic. All of these have either been dismissed or dropped.

2021 California gubernatorial recall election Special election for the governorship of the U.S. state of California

The 2021 California gubernatorial recall election was a special recall election that began in August 2021 and concluded on September 14, 2021, in which California voters chose not to recall incumbent Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, elected for the term January 2019 to January 2023.

Republican efforts to restrict voting following the 2020 presidential election Ongoing effort by the Republican Party to pass laws that make it harder to vote

Following the 2020 United States presidential election and the unsuccessful attempts by Donald Trump and various other Republican officials to overturn it, Republican lawmakers initiated a sweeping effort to make voting laws more restrictive within several states across the country. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, as of October 4, 2021, more than 425 bills that would restrict voting access have been introduced in 49 states—with 33 of these bills enacted across 19 states so far. The bills are largely centered around limiting mail-in voting, strengthening voter ID laws, shortening early voting, eliminating automatic and same-day voter registration, curbing the use of ballot drop boxes, and allowing for increased purging of voter rolls. Republicans in at least eight states have also introduced bills that would give lawmakers greater power over election administration after they were unsuccessful in their attempts to overturn election results in swing states won by Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the 2020 election.

<i>2000 Mules</i> 2022 American film

2000 Mules is a 2022 American political film by Dinesh D'Souza that falsely alleges Democrat-aligned individuals, or "mules," were paid by unnamed nonprofit organizations to illegally collect and deposit ballots into drop boxes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin during the 2020 presidential election.


  1. " WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info – DomainTools". WHOIS . Retrieved 2016-10-20.
  2. Tom Cohen. May 22, 2013. IRS official in charge of targeting unit takes the 5th. CNN. Retrieved: 22 May 2013.
  3. Juliet Eilperin. May 21, 2013. Conservative group True the Vote sues IRS over being subject to heightened scrutiny. The Washington Post. Retrieved: 22 May 2013.
  4. Marcos, Cristina (2014-10-25). "Squadrons form for voter ID fight". The Hill. Retrieved 26 October 2014.
  5. 1 2 Stephanie Saul. September 16, 2012. Looking, Very Closely, for Voter Fraud. The New York Times. Retrieved: 24 May 2013.
  6. True the Vote: history Archived 2012-07-31 at the Wayback Machine Accessed February 22, 2012
  7. 1 2 Blake, Mariah (October 2012). "The Ballot Cops". The Atlantic .
  8. Kevin Quinn. "Allegations of Voter Fraud in Harris County" accessed May 18, 2013
  9. Slajda, Rachel (October 5, 2010). "In Texas' Biggest County, a Minority Registration Drive is Crippled by Fraud Allegations". Talking Points Memo . Archived from the original on October 7, 2010. Retrieved May 18, 2022.
  10. Carl Engleking: Tea Party Ready to do Battle in Court over Recall Signatures Menomonee Falls: Patch Accessed February 22, 2012
  11. Clay Barbour: GAB Posts Walker Recall Petitions Online Despite Privacy Concerns Wisconsin State Journal, Accessed February 22, 2012
  12. True the Vote: Volunteer Archived 2013-02-04 at Accessed February 22, 2012
  13. True the Vote: Wisc voter's name fraudulently signed four times Archived 2012-12-27 at the Wayback Machine Accessed February 22, 2012
  14. Walker Challenge Sworn Written Challenge of Governor Scott K. Walker
  15. True the Vote: Walker Recall Executive Summary Archived 2012-06-09 at the Wayback Machine
  16. 1 2 Saul, Stephanie (2012-09-16). "Looking, Very Closely, for Voter Fraud". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2021-02-16.
  17. Fischer, Brendan; Dooling, William (2012-03-02). "True the Vote? Or Skew the Vote?". PR Watch. Retrieved 2021-02-16.
  18. PRNewswire: True the Vote Provides Online Training For Wisconsin for Wisconsin. Published May 26, 2012. Accessed June 6, 2012
  19. PR Newswire: True the Vote & Wisconsin Coalition to Provide election overseer training published May 16, 2012. Accessed June 6, 2012.
  20., front page announcement, accessed June 6, 2012.
  21. Allison Bauter: Barrett campaign criticizes recall election observers backed by Texas group. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Published June 4, 2012. Accessed June 6, 2012.
  22. Press Release: Verify the Recall Undaunted by the GAB, Accessed June 6, 2012.
  23. Finnegan, Michael (October 5, 2012). "Congressman opens voting rights probe of tea party group". Los Angeles Times .
  24. 1 2 Kent, Julie. "True the Vote Accused of Forging Signatures to Get Poll Monitors in Ohio". Cleveland Plain Dealer. Archived from the original on 9 November 2012. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  25. Engelbrecht, Catherine. "True the Vote Statement on Franklin County Denial to Place Poll Watchers". True the Vote. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  26. Your News Now: AG Holder In Austin vows to enforce civil rights protections Accessed February 22, 2012
  27. Katie Pavlich: Restoring Integrity in America's Elections, the 2012 True the Vote Summit., posted April 27, 2012. Accessed June 6, 2012.
  28. "Allen West concedes to Patrick Murphy". Politico. November 20, 2012. Retrieved November 20, 2012.
  29. Nick Wing (4 February 2013). "True The Vote Sues For 'Comprehensive, Outside Audit' Of Allen West Recount". The Huffington Post .
  30. Eilperin, Juliet (May 21, 2013). "Conservative group True the Vote sues IRS over being subject to heightened scrutiny". The Washington Post . Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  31. John D. McKinnon, Siobhan Hughes (12 May 2013). "Wider Problems Found at IRS". Wall Street Journal .
  32. Melchior, Jillian Kay (May 20, 2013). "True Scandal: A tea-party group targeted by Democrats gets attention from the IRS—and the FBI, OSHA, and the ATF". National Review.
  33. "TRUE THE VOTE FILES SUIT AGAINST THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE". True the Vote. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  34. "PHOTOS: Meet Groundswell's Major Players".
  35. " "The IRS Targeting Investigation: What is the Administration Doing?". 6 Feb 2014.
  36. "True the Vote Founder to Congress: "I Will Not Retreat. I Will Not Surrender. I Refuse To Be Intimidated"". Real Clear Politics. 6 February 2014.
  37. "TRUE THE VOTE STATEMENT ON ERIC HOLDER'S PENDING RESIGNATION". True the Vote. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  38. "TRUE THE VOTE STATEMENT FOLLOWING IRS LAWSUIT DECISION". True the Vote. October 23, 2014. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  39. "TRUE THE VOTE FILES NOTICE OF APPEAL IN IRS TARGETING LAWSUIT". True the Vote. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  40. "TRUE THE VOTE COMMENT ON EXECUTIVE AMNESTY ACTION". True the Vote. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  41. Hasen, Rick (December 21, 2014). "True the Vote Calls EAC Nominee Matthew Butler a "Book Burner"". Rick Hasen. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  42. "Attorney General Confirmation Hearing, Day 2". C-SPAN. C-SPAN. Retrieved 2 February 2015.
  43. Roche, Darragh (2020-11-26). "Donor Sues Pro-Trump Group for $2.5 Million for Failing to Prove Voter Fraud". Newsweek. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
  44. Fredrick N. Eshelman v. True the Vote, Inc., 4:20-cv-04034 (S.D. TexNovember 25, 2020).
  45. Luscombe, Richard (November 28, 2020). "Trump Supporter Who Gave $2.5m to Fight Voter Fraud Wants Money Back". The Guardian.
  46. 1 2 3 Boburg, Shawn; Swaine, Jon (February 15, 2021). "A GOP donor gave $2.5 million for a voter fraud investigation. Now he wants his money back". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2021-02-16.
  47. "Victory! Lawsuit Against True the Vote Dismissed" (Press release). The Bopp Law Firm. April 14, 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-23.
  48. "True the Vote Launches "Validate the Vote" Initiative and Whistleblower Compensation Fund to Ensure Election Validity, Process Integrity" (Press release). True The Vote. 2020-11-06. Archived from the original on 2021-04-24. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
  49. 1 2 3 Swenson, Ali (May 3, 2022). "FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot 'mules". Associated Press. Praised by former President Donald Trump as exposing "great election fraud", the movie, called “2000 Mules,” paints an ominous picture suggesting Democrat-aligned ballot “mules” were supposedly paid to illegally collect and drop off ballots in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. But that's based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data, which is not precise enough to confirm that somebody deposited a ballot into a drop box, according to experts.
  50. 1 2 3 Dreisbach, Tom (May 17, 2022). "A pro-Trump film suggests its data are so accurate, it solved a murder. That's false". National Public Radio.
  51. Bump, Philip (April 29, 2022). "Analysis | The dishonest pivot at the heart of the new voter-fraud conspiracy". The Washington Post . Retrieved 2022-04-30.
  52. 1 2 Bump, Philip (May 11, 2022). "'2000 Mules' offers the least convincing election-fraud theory yet". The Washington Post .
  53. 1 2 Niesse, Mark (May 10, 2022). "What '2000 Mules' leaves out of ballot harvesting claims". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution .
  54. McCarthy, Bill; Sherman, Amy (May 4, 2022). "The faulty premise of the '2,000 mules' trailer about voting by mail in the 2020 election". PolitiFact.
  55. Funke, Daniel (May 12, 2022). "US documentary revives Trump's unproven election fraud claims". Agence France-Presse.
  56. "TTV and 2000 Mules: Frequently Asked Questions". True the Vote . 2022-05-12. Retrieved 2022-05-16.
  57. Niesse, Mark; Bluestein, Greg (October 21, 2021). "GBI chief: Not enough evidence to pursue GOP's ballot fraud claim". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution . ISSN   1539-7459 . Retrieved 2022-05-12.
  58. Reilly, Ryan J (October 20, 2010). "True The Vote: Voter Intimidation Claims Come From 'Partisan Operatives'". Talking Points Memo. Archived from the original on October 23, 2010. Retrieved February 22, 2012.
  59. Michael Finnegan. October 5, 2012. Congressman opens voting rights probe of tea party group. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved: 24 May 2013.
  60. Attkisson, Sharyl (2013-05-29). "What's going on between the IRS and True the Vote?". CBS News. Retrieved 3 August 2014.