Election law

Last updated

Election law is a branch of public law that relates to the democratic processes, election of representatives and office holders, and referendums, through the regulation of the electoral system, voting rights, ballot access, election management bodies, election campaign, the division of the territory into electoral zones, the procedures for the registration of voters and candidacies, its financing and propaganda, voting, counting of votes, scrutiny, electoral disputes, electoral observation and all contentious matters derived from them. It is a discipline falling at the juncture of constitutional law and political science, and involves "the politics of law and the law of politics". [1]

Contents

History and the field

After the legally-contested 2000 United States presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore, the importance of election law has grown in the United States. According to the National Law Journal, election law "grew from a niche to multi million-dollar draw." [2] The UCLA election law professor Richard Hasen showed that in the United States, litigation rates have been soaring for two decades and hit record high during the 2020 election. [3] [4]

Since the early 2000s, election law has been taught at most of the law schools throughout the United States. [5] American election law experts and academics are connected in the academic network founded by Daniel H. Lowenstein, professor at UCLA Law School, and Richard L. Hasen. Lowenstein is considered the "pioneer" and the one who "invented" the election law. [6] [7] [8] In 2000s, Lowenstein and Hasen edited the Election Law Journal and the election law mailinglist. [6] As of 2022, Hasen manages the Election Law Blog and the mailing list. [9] [10] The Election Law Journal is an academic publication devoted to election law, currently edited by David Canon of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. [11] Most of its articles deal with election law in the United States. [12]

According to the Routledge Handbook of Election Law, election law is a growing area globally. [13] [14] [15] Voters around the world are increasingly challenging election results. Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, Iceland, Kenya, and Malawi are some countries where courts have recently invalidated national elections or referendums. [16] Electoral disputes are good for democracy, according to the book's editors. [13] They can "remove voters' doubts, remedy violations, increase trust, and, when needed, invalidate flawed elections and defend the integrity of the electoral process. Letting all participants know violations will not be tolerated benefits future elections." [16]

Issues

Some of the questions that are addressed by election law are:

Sources of election law

Regimes in comparative law

France

The French electoral code addresses most of the elections. However, other texts frame this material for special elections. Thus the Constitution but fixed some general basic provisions concerning the presidential election, the legislative and senatorial elections.

For litigation election, the court depends on the concerned election. The Constitutional Council is responsible for the most important elections: presidential elections and senatorial elections or referendums. In contrast, to the municipal or district elections the administrative tribunal has jurisdiction, then the appeal is to the State Council. Finally, for the regional and European elections, the Council of State which has jurisdiction at first and last resort.

In decisions on electoral matters, the law takes into account the results: if an essential principle is violated, the election is canceled but if fraud is "classic" (ballot stuffing, failure to register as voters, vote the dead ...) but the election was won (after counting of ballots invalidated) with a large or very large lead, the judge then cancels rarely the result. [17]

Italy

The Italian Constitution fixes some general basic provisions concerning the legislative elections. Electoral disputes in Italy are complex because they are divided between several court orders. For example, with regard to the dispute concerning registration of candidates for ballots or litigation election, the administrative court has jurisdiction. For eligibility and disfranchisement, the judge is the ordinary tribunal. [18]

If a fraud is proven by the judge, it does not cancel necessarily the elections, [19] unless they think that the result of election without the fraud would not have been identical. The survival of the acts already performed by the elected organs would seem solved by abundant case law that protects innocent trust of third parties. [20]

Mexico

Elections in Mexico are held every 6 years to elect a president and every 3 years to elect a legislature. These elections determine who, on the national level, takes the position of the head of state – the president – as well as the legislature. At the local level, each of Mexico's 31 constituent states elects a governor to serve a six-year term; they also elect legislative deputies who sit in state congresses, and municipal presidents (presidentes municipales, or mayors). Mexico City, the national capital, elects a head of government in lieu of a mayor, city assemblymen in lieu of state congressional deputies, and borough mayors in lieu of municipal mayors.

Philippines

The president, vice-president, and the senators are elected for a six-year term, while the members of the House of Representatives, governors, vice-governors, members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan (provincial board members), mayors, vice-mayors, members of the Sangguniang Panlungsod/members of the Sangguniang Bayan (city/municipal councilors), barangay officials, and the members of the Sangguniang Kabataan (youth councilors) are elected to serve for a three-year term.

Synchronized with the national elections are the local elections. The voter may vote for any of the following:

If the city the voter is residing in a highly urbanized city, or independent component city. or in Pateros, the voter can not vote for any of the provincial-level positions.

Republic of the Congo

United States

Elections in the United States are held for government officials at the federal, state, and local levels. At the federal level, the nation's head of state, the president, is elected indirectly by the people of each state, through an Electoral College. Today, these electors almost always vote with the popular vote of their state. All members of the federal legislature, the Congress, are directly elected by the people of each state. There are many elected offices at state level, each state having at least an elective governor and legislature. There are also elected offices at the local level, in counties, cities, towns, townships, boroughs, and villages; as well as for special districts and school districts which may transcend county and municipal boundaries.

The legal case Pitts v. Black in 1984 established the definition of “residence” under the Election Law was excessively strict to the point of disenfranchising homeless voters. The Court concluded a specific location where the people returns regularly and a place designated to receive mail should satisfy the “residence” requirements. As a result, homeless people were allowed to cast their ballots. [21]

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, election law is legislated for by The Houses of Parliament. The statutory governance of UK Election law comes from acts of parliament such as the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011. The Electoral Commission's mandate and establishment was set out in the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA), and ranges from the regulation of political donations and expenditure by political and third parties through to promoting greater participation in the electoral process.

The Electoral Administration Act 2006 made a number of improvements to electoral registration, improving the security arrangements for absent voting, allowing observers to attend elections and a major change in reducing the minimum age for candidates at UK parliamentary elections. It also introduced the performance standards regime for electoral services.

Notable authors

According to University of Chicago Law Professor Brian Leiter, the most cited American election law scholars between 2016 and 2020 included Samuel Issacharoff, Richard Pildes, Richard Hasen, Heather Gerken, Richard Briffault, Nathaniel Persily, and Nicholas Stephanopoulos, respectively. [22] Other notable election law experts and professors include David Schultz, [23] [24] Joshua Douglas, [25] [26] [27] Ed Foley, [28] [29] Guy-Uriel Charles, [30] [31] Jessica Levinson, [32] [33] [34] Rebecca Green, [35] Eugene Mazo, [36] Justin Levitt, [34] [37] in the U.S, Graeme Orr [38] in Australia and Jurij Toplak in Europe. [39] [40] [41]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-round system</span> Voting system

The two-round system, also called ballotage, top-two runoff, or two-round plurality, is a single winner voting method. It is sometimes called plurality-runoff, although this term can also be used for other, closely-related systems such as ranked-choice voting or the exhaustive ballot. It falls under the class of plurality-based voting rules, together with instant-runoff and first-past-the-post (FPP). In a two-round system, both rounds are held under choose-one voting, where the voter marks a single favorite candidate. The two candidates with the most votes in the first round proceed to a second round, where all other candidates are excluded.

Disfranchisement, also disenfranchisement or voter disqualification, is the restriction of suffrage of a person or group of people, or a practice that has the effect of preventing someone from exercising the right to vote. Disfranchisement can also refer to the revocation of power or control of a particular individual, community, or being to the natural amenity they have; that is to deprive of a franchise, of a legal right, of some privilege or inherent immunity. Disfranchisement may be accomplished explicitly by law or implicitly through requirements applied in a discriminatory fashion, through intimidation, or by placing unreasonable requirements on voters for registration or voting. High barriers to entry to the political competition can disenfranchise political movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Chile</span>

Elections in Chile are held nationwide, including the presidency, parliament, regional offices, and municipal positions. Chilean citizens and foreign residents with legal residency of at least five years, who are 18 years or older on election day, are eligible to vote. Previously, voting was voluntary, but since 2023, it has become compulsory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in the United States</span>

In the politics of the United States, elections are held for government officials at the federal, state, and local levels. At the federal level, the nation's head of state, the president, is elected indirectly by the people of each state, through an Electoral College. Today, these electors almost always vote with the popular vote of their state. All members of the federal legislature, the Congress, are directly elected by the people of each state. There are many elected offices at state level, each state having at least an elective governor and legislature. There are also elected offices at the local level, in counties, cities, towns, townships, boroughs, and villages; as well as for special districts and school districts which may transcend county and municipal boundaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter suppression</span> Strategy designed to restrict specific groups of people from voting

Voter suppression is a strategy used to influence the outcome of an election by discouraging or preventing specific groups of people from voting. It is distinguished from political campaigning in that campaigning attempts to change likely voting behavior by changing the opinions of potential voters through persuasion and organization, activating otherwise inactive voters, or registering new supporters. Voter suppression, instead, attempts to gain an advantage by reducing the turnout of certain voters. Suppression is an anti-democratic tactic associated with authoritarianism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Referendums in Italy</span>

A referendum, in the Italian legal system is a request directed to the whole electorate to express their view on a determined question. It is the main instrument of direct democracy in Italy.

Elections in the Philippines are of several types. The president, vice-president, and the senators are elected for a six-year term, while the members of the House of Representatives, governors, vice-governors, members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, mayors, vice-mayors, members of the Sangguniang Panlungsod/members of the Sangguniang Bayan, barangay officials, and the members of the Sangguniang Kabataan are elected to serve for a three-year term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2001 Italian general election</span>

The 2001 Italian general election was held in Italy on 13 May 2001 to elect members of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate of the Republic. The election was won by the centre-right coalition House of Freedoms led by Silvio Berlusconi, defeating Francesco Rutelli, former mayor of Rome, and leader of the centre-left coalition The Olive Tree, and rising back to power after Berlusconi's first victory in the 1994 Italian general election.

Electoral reform in the United States refers to the efforts of change for American elections and the electoral system used in the US.

In Catholic canon law, Right of Option is a way of obtaining a benefice or a title, by the choice of the new titulary himself.

Ex tunc is a legal term derived from Latin, and means "from the outset". It can be contrasted with ex nunc, which means "from now on". An example of usage of the term can be found in contract law, where voidance of a contract can lead to it either being void ex nunc, i.e. from then on, or ex tunc, in which case it is treated as though it had never come into existence.

Nomination rules in elections regulate the conditions under which a candidate or political party is entitled to stand for election. The right to stand for election, right to be a candidate or passive suffrage is one part of free and fair elections. Passive suffrage is distinct from active suffrage, the right to vote. The criteria to stand as a candidate depends on the individual legal system. They may include the age of a candidate, citizenship, endorsement by a political party and profession. Laws restrictions, such as competence or moral aptitude, can be used in a discriminatory manner. Restrictive and discriminatory nomination rules can impact the civil rights of candidates, political parties, and voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Connecticut</span>

Various kinds of elections in Connecticut occurs annually in each of the state's cities and towns, the exact type of which is dependent on the year. Elections for federal and statewide offices occur in even-numbered years, while municipal elections occur in odd-numbered ones. The office of the Connecticut Secretary of State oversees the election process, including voting and vote counting. In a 2020 study, Connecticut was ranked as the 20th easiest state for citizens to vote in.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 14</span>

Proposition 14 is a California ballot proposition that appeared on the ballot during the June 2010 state elections. It was a constitutional amendment that effectively transformed California's non-presidential elections from first-past-the-post to a nonpartisan blanket primary. The proposition was legislatively referred to voters by the State Legislature and approved by 54% of the voters. It consolidated all primary elections for a particular office into an election with one ballot that would be identical to all voters, regardless of their party preferences. The two candidates with the most votes in the primary election would then be the only candidates who would run in the general election, regardless of their party affiliation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 Italian local elections</span>

The 2010 Italian local elections were held on different dates; most on 29–30 March concurrently with the Regional elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Idaho</span>

Some type of election in Idaho occurs annually in each of the state's cities and towns, the exact type of which is dependent on the year. Elections for federal and statewide offices occur in even-numbered years, while municipal elections occur in odd-numbered years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Philippine general election</span> Election in the Philippines on 2016

A general election in the Philippines took place on May 9, 2016, for executive and legislative branches for all levels of government – national, provincial, and local, except for the barangay officials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in North Dakota</span>

Statewide elections in the U.S. state of North Dakota take place every two years. Most executive offices and all legislators are elected to four-year terms, with half the terms expiring on U.S. Presidential election years, and the other half expiring on mid-term election years.

Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections (BSKE) in the Philippines were held on October 30, 2023. The elected barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan officials already and legally began their terms earlier at noon on January 1, 2023, and thus took office as soon as they were proclaimed to have won their respective positions. The barangay is the smallest administrative division in the country.

References

  1. ↑ Oshisanya, O. (2020). "13. Election Law". An Almanac of Contemporary Judicial Restatements (Civil Law) vol. ii: Almanac vol. ii. Almanac Basebooks. Almanac Foundation. p.  265. ISBN   978-978-51200-2-8.
  2. ↑ "How Election Law Grew From a Niche Practice to a Multimillion-Dollar Draw". National Law Journal. Archived from the original on 2023-06-01. Retrieved 2022-08-26.
  3. ↑ "Election Litigation Rates Are Soaring". Liebert Pub.
  4. ↑ Hasen, Richard L. (2022). "Research Note: Record Election Litigation Rates in the 2020 Election: An Aberration or a Sign of Things to Come?". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 21 (2): 150–154. doi:10.1089/elj.2021.0050. S2CID   246930833.
  5. ↑ Yuh, Grace. "Training a new generation of election law lawyers". Harvard Law School. Retrieved 2022-08-26.
  6. 1 2 Winkler, Adam (2010-12-01). "Introduction to Lowenstein Festschrift". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 9 (4): 261–262. doi:10.1089/elj.2010.9402. ISSN   1533-1296.
  7. ↑ Cain, Bruce (2010). "Foundational wisdom: the scholarship of Daniel Lowenstein". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 9 (4): 263–272. doi:10.1089/elj.2010.9415. ISSN   1533-1296.
  8. ↑ Tokaji, Daniel P. (2010-12-01). "Lowenstein Contra Lowenstein: Conflicts of Interest in Election Administration". Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy. 9 (4): 421–441. doi:10.1089/elj.2010.9407. ISSN   1533-1296.
  9. ↑ "Can Donald Trump run for president if charged and convicted of removing official records?". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved 2022-08-26.
  10. ↑ Journal, A. B. A. "Could Trump be banned from office if he's convicted of taking government documents?". ABA Journal. Retrieved 2022-08-26.
  11. ↑ "Election Law Journal | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers". home.liebertpub.com. Retrieved 2022-08-26.
  12. ↑ "Election Law Journal | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers". home.liebertpub.com. Retrieved 2022-08-26.
  13. 1 2 "Election law a growing area – and good for democracy, say experts". Legal Futures. August 18, 2022.
  14. ↑ "Den nye norm er, at domstolenegodkender et valgslegitimitet". K News. August 16, 2022.
  15. ↑ "How Kenya Election Petition Will Strengthen Future Polls". Capital FM News. August 21, 2022.
  16. 1 2 "Letter: Court rulings on elections bolster trust in democracy". Financial Times.
  17. ↑ On the other side, opposite judgement comes when the participation of the lists has resulted in an imbalance, also because the deviation of the votes between the two clusters is less than one thousand ballotts: Buonomo, Giampiero (2001). "La partecipazione (viziata) delle liste produce uno squilibrio nel voto". Diritto&Giustizia Edizione Online. Archived from the original on 2012-08-01. Retrieved 2016-03-19.
  18. ↑ "A principle of separation of powers ( ... ) is the rationale of the law ( ... ) which ousts the administrative courts from ineligibility dispute": Buonomo, Giampiero (2000). "Il giudicato civile in materia elettorale preclude l'azione popolare davanti al Tar". Diritto&Giustizia Edizione Online. Archived from the original on 2012-08-01. Retrieved 2016-03-19.
  19. ↑ The faults, as null and void, cannot justify a reversal "by forfeit" of the electoral outcome: Buonomo, Giampiero (2000). "Elezioni Molise: gestione incerta fino all'annullamento definitivo". Diritto&Giustizia Edizione Online. Archived from the original on 2012-08-01. Retrieved 2016-03-19.
  20. ↑ Buonomo, Giampiero (2002). "L'incandidabilità di un eletto travolge il consiglio regionale abruzzese (e ripropone gli interrogativi molisani)". Diritto&Giustizia Edizione Online. Archived from the original on 2012-08-01. Retrieved 2016-03-19.
  21. ↑ "Pitts v. Black, 608 F. Supp. 696". Justia.
  22. ↑ "Brian Leiter's Law School Reports". leiterlawschool.typepad.com. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  23. ↑ Fung, Katherine (2022-07-19). "Trump's early 2024 announcement could help fund legal battles". Newsweek. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  24. ↑ "If a lawmaker violates residency rule, what happens to the ballot?". MinnPost. 2022-08-16. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  25. ↑ Roldan, Roberto (2022-05-24). "Louisville elections officials will tally votes again in close Metro Council, U.S. House primaries". 89.3 WFPL News Louisville. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  26. ↑ Douglas, Joshua. "Opinion | What I Learned Talking to Fourth-Graders About How to Design Elections". POLITICO. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  27. ↑ "Election Law Experts Sound the Alarm About 'Extremely Dangerous' Voting Rights Case the Supreme Court Just Agreed to Hear". Law & Crime. 2022-06-30. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  28. ↑ Washington, District of Columbia 1800 I. Street NW; Dc 20006. "PolitiFact - Much has changed since Jimmy Carter's report on fraud in mail voting". @politifact. Retrieved 2022-08-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  29. ↑ Boucher, Dave. "Sidney Powell, Kraken legal team face sanctions, court costs and potential disbarment over election lawsuit". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  30. ↑ Tierney Sneed (11 August 2021). "John Roberts and the Supreme Court might block anything Democrats do on voting rights". CNN. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  31. ↑ Johnson, Carrie (2022-02-25). "U.S. judges are narrowing voting protections. Some fear lasting damage". NPR. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  32. ↑ "'I don't agree with her on anything,' California Democrats say of Liz Cheney — as they donate to her race". Los Angeles Times. 2022-07-29. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  33. ↑ "Progressive DA recalled in California elections with high stakes – and low turnout". the Guardian. 2022-06-09. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  34. 1 2 Vaziri, Aidin; Cabanatuan, Michael (2022-06-07). "California Election: See the neighborhoods that drove the recall against Chesa Boudin". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  35. ↑ "Tuesday's safe harbor deadline is boost for Biden". AP NEWS. 2021-04-20. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  36. ↑ Fox, Joey (2022-04-11). "After anointing Menendez, Hudson Dems are trying to eliminate his opponents". New Jersey Globe. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  37. ↑ "In recorded call, Trump pressures Georgia official to 'find' votes to overturn election". Reuters. 2021-01-03. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  38. ↑ "Election writs claim fails to gain seal of approval". Australian Associated Press. 2022-06-10. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  39. ↑ "Letter: Court rulings on elections bolster trust in democracy". Financial Times. 2022-08-17. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  40. ↑ Rose, Neil (2022-08-17). "Election law a growing area - and good for democracy, say experts". Legal Futures. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  41. ↑ REPORTER, CAPITAL (2022-08-20). "How Kenya election petition will strengthen future polls » Capital News". Capital News. Retrieved 2022-08-29.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.