Jesse Richman (academic)

Last updated

Jesse Richman
Education University of Pittsburgh (BPhil)
Carnegie Mellon University (MA, PhD)
Employer Old Dominion University

Jesse Richman is an associate professor of political science and geography at Old Dominion University. His research has focused on legislative politics, public opinion, electoral politics, and intellectual property. [1] He is known for his 2014 study with David Earnest about illegal non-citizen voting, which was widely rejected by the broader academic community [2] and was notably misused by Donald Trump and the election denial movement in the United States to justify false claims of widespread fraud. [3] [4] Richman's testimony in Fish v. Kobach was widely criticized while his testimony in Arizona received mixed reviews.

Contents

Education

Richman received a Bachelor of Philosophy from the University of Pittsburgh in 1999, a Master of Arts from Carnegie Mellon University in 2001, and a Doctor of Philosophy from Carnegie Mellon in 2005. [1]

He received a Fulbright grant at the National University of Public Service in Budapest, Hungary in 2019. [5]

2014 study with David Earnest

Before the 2014 study (and after) there was a virtual consensus in academia that noncitizen citizen did not exist on any functional level. [4]

In 2014, Richman published a widely discredited study in the Electoral Studies journal with his colleague David Earnest and Gulshan A. Chatta, which extrapolated from Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) survey response data to estimate how many non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2010. The study claimed that 6.4% of noncitizens had voted in 2008 and 2.2% in 2010. [6] [7] Richman stood by his report, [8] though in 2017 he admitted his high-end estimates were unrealistic. [2]

Criticism

A 2015 study of the same data by CCES coordinators Stephen Ansolabehere, Brian Schaffner and Samantha Luks, published in the same journal, found no evidence of noncitizen voting. [9] [10] [11] Researchers found that at most, one survey respondent was a non-citizen voter, though even that could be due to a false match to a voter record. [9] [12] Brian Schaffner wrote about Richman’s study, "I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections." [10]

200 political scientists signed an open letter saying Richman's study should "not be cited or used in any debate over fraudulent voting." [13] Richard Hasen in 2020 said, "one wonders how Richman's paper got published." [14] Snopes described the paper as "wildly discredited." [15] Wendy Weiser and Douglas Keith described the study as "thoroughly debunked." [16] Spenser Mestel commented on how unusual it was for Richman to make such broad claims and express so much certainty about his results at the time, which is not typical in studies on voting behavior that are heavily qualified and narrow. [4] In 2017, The New York Times said that the debate has moved on from Richman's study (whose claims it described as having fallen apart) to whether or not any evidence for noncitizen voting exists. [2]

Methodological critiques

ABC News said the study's methodology was widely criticized. [17] The CCES sent out a newsletter encouraging researchers not to use their data the way that Richman and Earnest did. [18] The main issue with the study is the sample size and the unreliable database of Internet respondents. [18] When the survey was rerun by different researchers and the people who answered the citizenship question differently were removed as presumably having misclicked the survey result in the earlier survey, the researchers found 0 non-citizens who voted. [18] The Intercept argued that five clicks is way too small of a sample size, especially for an online survey, to extrapolate from. [3]

Use by others

The study was cited, often improperly, by conservative news and conspiracy theory websites, [15] by writers at Breitbart and by Donald Trump, claiming that the study showed noncitizen voting to be a real issue and one that could be changing election outcomes all over the United States. [3] [4] In 2017, Richman rebuked Trump's false claims that millions of non-citizens had voted saying "Trump and others have been misreading our research and exaggerating our results to make claims we don't think our research supports." [19] A self-described political moderate, Richman sometimes regrets publishing the study given how it has been a cornerstone of Trump's claims of voter fraud and hopes that decisions on what to do about voter fraud are made on the totality of research and not just one cherry-picked study, even if it's the one he published. [19]

Court testimony

Fish v. Kobach (2018)

In 2017, NBC News described Richman's claim of 18,000 noncitizen voters in Kansas as having been debunked. [20] Richman had extrapolated from "having discovered six noncitizens on a list of Kansans with temporary drivers' licenses who 'either registered to vote or attempted to register to vote." [20] Tomas Lopez of the Brennan Center criticized Richman as putting out big estimates but not checking to see if they are accurate. [20]

Kris Kobach paid Jesse Richman $40,663.35 as an expert witness in 2018 for Fish v. Kobach. [4] ProPublica summarized Judge Julie Robinson's assessment of Richman's conclusions as "'confusing, inconsistent and methodologically flawed,' and adding that they were 'credibly dismantled' by Ansolabehere. She labeled elements of Richman’s testimony 'disingenuous' and 'misleading,' and stated that she gave his research 'no weight' in her decision." [21] Richard Hasen called parts of Richman's testimony "social science at its worst". [22]

Arizona citizenship law case (2023)

In 2023, Richman examined Arizona state voter and DMV files as an expert witness for a court case on Arizona's proof of citizenship law. Richman said that he found 1,934 registered voters out of more than 4 million whose records indicated they were non-citizens at the time of registration or afterward. He also examined nationwide data from the 2022 Cooperative Election Study (CES), and found that just under one percent of non-citizens were registered to vote. Richman estimated that half a percent of non-citizens had voted in 2022. [8] [23]

U.S. District Judge Susan R. Bolton wrote in her ruling on the case that "the Court found Dr. Richman’s testimony credible and affords his opinions considerable weight." [8] Justin Levitt, who had been skeptical of Richman's earlier research on the topic, said "while the CES data here does look to me to be more reliable than Prof. Richman's prior forays, I'd need some more information before I believed it were reliable" and posited that non-citizen turnout could be lower than Richman estimated. [24] Brian Schaffner "rejects the use of the CES to study noncitizens entirely," one of the techniques used by Richman to claim significant noncitizen voting in Arizona. [25]

Writing

Richman has written opinion pieces for The Monkey Cage blog at the Washington Post . [5] [26] [27] [28]

Books

Richman has co-authored two books on international trade:

Related Research Articles

An opinion poll, often simply referred to as a survey or a poll, is a human research survey of public opinion from a particular sample. Opinion polls are usually designed to represent the opinions of a population by conducting a series of questions and then extrapolating generalities in ratio or within confidence intervals. A person who conducts polls is referred to as a pollster.

Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election manipulation, voter fraud, or vote rigging, involves illegal interference with the process of an election, either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both. It differs from but often goes hand-in-hand with voter suppression. What exactly constitutes electoral fraud varies from country to country, though the goal is often election subversion.

Election law is a branch of public law that relates to the democratic processes, election of representatives and office holders, and referendums, through the regulation of the electoral system, voting rights, ballot access, election management bodies, election campaign, the division of the territory into electoral zones, the procedures for the registration of voters and candidacies, its financing and propaganda, voting, counting of votes, scrutiny, electoral disputes, electoral observation and all contentious matters derived from them. It is a discipline falling at the juncture of constitutional law and political science, and involves "the politics of law and the law of politics".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter suppression</span> Strategy designed to restrict specific groups of people from voting

Voter suppression is a strategy used to influence the outcome of an election by discouraging or preventing specific groups of people from voting. It is distinguished from political campaigning in that campaigning attempts to change likely voting behavior by changing the opinions of potential voters through persuasion and organization, activating otherwise inactive voters, or registering new supporters. Voter suppression, instead, attempts to gain an advantage by reducing the turnout of certain voters. Suppression is an anti-democratic tactic associated with authoritarianism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kris Kobach</span> American lawyer and politician (born 1966)

Kris William Kobach is an American lawyer and politician who has served as the attorney general of Kansas since 2023. He previously served as the 31st secretary of state of Kansas from 2011 to 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans von Spakovsky</span> American lawyer

Hans Anatol von Spakovsky is an American attorney and a former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC). He is the manager of The Heritage Foundation's Election Law Reform Initiative and a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. He is an advocate for stricter voting laws. He has been described as playing an influential role in making concern about voter fraud mainstream in the Republican Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter identification laws in the United States</span>

Voter ID laws in the United States are laws that require a person to provide some form of official identification before they are permitted to register to vote, receive a ballot for an election, or to actually vote in elections in the United States.

Voter suppression in the United States consists of various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote. Such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, economic, gender, age and disability discrimination. After the American Civil War, all African-American men were granted voting rights, but poll taxes or language tests were used to limit and suppress the ability to register or cast a ballot. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 improved voting access. Since the beginning of voter suppression efforts, proponents of these laws have cited concerns over electoral integrity as a justification for various restrictions and requirements, while opponents argue that these constitute bad faith given the lack of voter fraud evidence in the United States.

Electoral fraud in the United States, also known as voter fraud, involves illegal voting in or manipulation of United States elections. Some types of fraud include voter impersonation or in-person voter fraud, mail-in or absentee ballot fraud, illegal voting by noncitizens and double voting.

Voter segments in political polling in the United States consist of all adults, registered voters, and likely voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity</span> Presidential commission created by President Donald Trump in 2017

The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, also called the Voter Fraud Commission, was a Presidential Commission established by Donald Trump that ran from May 11, 2017, to January 3, 2018. The Trump administration said the commission would review claims of voter fraud, improper registration, and voter suppression. The establishment of the commission followed Trump's false claim that millions of illegal immigrants had voted in the 2016 presidential election, costing him the popular vote. Vice President Mike Pence was chosen as chair of the commission and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was its vice chair and day-to-day administrator.

Brian Frederick Schaffner is an American political scientist. He is the Newhouse Professor of Civic studies at Tufts University and a faculty associate at Harvard University's Institute for Quantitative Social Science. He is also the founding director of the UMass Poll and a co-principal investigator for the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), a survey of about 50,000 U.S. voters. He has criticized President Donald Trump for citing a 2014 study based on data from the CCES as proof that voter fraud is widespread in the United States. Of this study, Schaffner told CNN that "Of the people who we were sure were non-citizens, we could not find any who actually cast a vote." He has also said that the authors of the study Trump cited, Jesse Richman and David Earnest, used inaccurate methodology to conclude that millions of non-citizens voted in U.S. elections. He told MassLive.com in January 2017 that "I have been very vocal in speaking out about the study, especially because I feel a sense of responsibility".

The Cooperative Election Study is a national online survey conducted before and after United States presidential and midterm elections. Originally designed by Stephen Ansolabehere of Harvard University, it was originally fielded in 2006 by the Palo Alto, California-based company Polimetrix, Inc., with help from 39 different American universities. Its original goal was to survey voters in the 2006 midterm elections. When it was begun, it was the largest survey of Congressional elections ever, with over 36,500 participants in its first wave alone.

Michael A. Roman is an American Republican political operative and opposition researcher. He was director of election day operations for Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign, and was subsequently involved in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. He previously worked on Trump's 2016 campaign and served in Trump's White House in 2017 and 2018. Prior to joining the Trump campaign, he ran an in-house intelligence unit for the Koch brothers.

<i>Fish v. Kobach</i> 2018 Kansas District Court case

Fish v. Kobach was a 2018 bench trial in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in which five Kansas residents and the League of Women Voters contested the legality of the Documentary Proof of Citizenship (DPOC) requirement of the Kansas Secure and Fair Elections (SAFE) Act, which was enacted in 2011 and took effect in 2013.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is an American conservative legal group based in Alexandria, Virginia, which is known for suing states and local governments to purge voters from election rolls. The nonprofit was constituted in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sanders–Trump voters</span> American voter group

In the United States, Sanders–Trump voters, also known as Bernie–Trump voters, are Americans who voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 or 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, but who subsequently voted for Republican Party nominee Donald Trump in the general election. In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, these voters composed an estimated 12% of Sanders supporters. At least another 12% of Sanders supporters did not vote for Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton, but also did not vote for Trump.

Election subversion can involve a range of measures to change the outcome of a vote, including voter suppression, election denial, disinformation, intimidation and other legal or illegal attempts to not count or disqualify certain votes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Election denial movement in the United States</span> Conspiracy theory

The election denial movement in the United States is a widespread false belief among many Republicans that elections in the United States are rigged and stolen through election fraud by Democrats. Adherents of the movement are referred to as election deniers. Election fraud conspiracy theories have spread online and through conservative conferences, community events, and door-to-door canvassing. Since the 2020 United States presidential election, many Republican politicians have sought elective office or taken legislative steps to address what they assert is weak election integrity leading to widespread fraudulent elections, though no evidence of systemic election fraud has come to light and many studies have found that it is extremely rare.

The United States Republican Party has undertaken a broad range of efforts to disrupt the 2024 United States presidential election so that its candidate, Donald Trump, has a greater chance of winning. The efforts come amidst a larger election denial movement among Republicans in the United States since the 2020 election.

References

  1. 1 2 "Jesse Richman". Old Dominion University. August 21, 2022. Archived from the original on September 8, 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 "Illegal Voting Claims, and Why They Don't Hold Up". New York Times. January 26, 2017. Mr. Richman still maintains that some small percentage of noncitizens vote in American elections. But the debate over this study has moved on. It's no longer about whether millions of illegal votes were cast, but whether there's any evidence for noncitizen voting at all. The study's bold claims fell apart because of something called response error: the possibility that people taking a survey don't answer a question correctly — in this case, a question about being American citizens. There is always a tiny amount of response error in surveys. Respondents might not understand the question. Or they might understand it, but mark the wrong answer by mistake, if the survey is self-administered. An interviewer, if there is one, could accidentally record the wrong answer. Such errors usually aren't a problem large enough to change the results of a survey.
  3. 1 2 3 Mackey, Robert (January 26, 2017). "Just 5 Clicks on an Internet Survey Inspired Trump's Claim Millions Voted Illegally". The Intercept. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Mestel, Spenser (November 1, 2020). "How claims of voter fraud were supercharged by bad science". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
  5. 1 2 Richman, Jesse (January 13, 2020). "Opinion: Has Hungary's opposition learned to coordinate against Fidesz, the right-wing governing party?". Washington Post (Monkey Cage blog). ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved September 11, 2024.
  6. ↑ Richman, Jesse (October 24, 2014). "Blog: Could non-citizens decide the November election?". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 18, 2015.
  7. ↑ Richman, Jesse T.; Chattha, Gulshan A.; Earnest, David C. (December 1, 2014). "Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections?". Electoral Studies . 36: 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.001.
  8. 1 2 3 Kessler, Glenn (March 6, 2024). "Opinion: The truth about noncitizen voting in federal elections". Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 13, 2024. Retrieved April 21, 2024. There is scattered evidence of noncitizens voting in federal elections — sometime by mistake (such as erroneously thinking they were eligible while getting a driver's license) but also with nefarious intent ... Given the paucity of evidence of noncitizen voting, many election researchers have long said that there was little to support the idea that noncitizen voting had ever affected the outcome of a major election. But that does not necessarily prove that the phenomenon does not happen.
  9. 1 2 Ansolabehere, Stephen; Luks, Samantha; Schaffner, Brian F. (December 2015). "The perils of cherry picking low frequency events in large sample surveys". Electoral Studies. 40: 409–10. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.07.002.
  10. 1 2 Schaffner, Brian. "Trump's Claims About Illegal Votes Are Nonsense. I Debunked the Study He Cites as 'Evidence.'". Politico Magazine. Retrieved January 27, 2017. I can say unequivocally that this research is not only wrong, it is irresponsible social science and should never have been published in the first place. There is no evidence that non-citizens have voted in recent U.S. elections.
  11. ↑ Mestel, Spenser (November 1, 2020). "How claims of voter fraud were supercharged by bad science". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
  12. ↑ Tesler, Michael (October 27, 2014). "Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens' voting". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved September 8, 2024. A number of academics and commentators have already expressed skepticism about the paper's assumptions and conclusions, though...the assumption that non-citizens, who volunteered to take online surveys administered in English about American politics, would somehow be representative of the entire non-citizen population seems tenuous at best...any response error in self-reported citizenship status could have substantially altered the authors' conclusions because they were only able to validate the votes of five respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters in the 2008 CCES. It turns out that such response error was common for self-reported non-citizens in the 2010-2012 CCES Panel Study — a survey that re-interviewed 19,533 respondents in 2012...Even more problematic, misreported citizenship status was most common among respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters...CCES is probably not an appropriate data source for testing such claims.
  13. ↑ Huseman, Jessica (June 19, 2018). "How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed". ProPublica. Retrieved September 8, 2024. Academics pilloried Richman's conclusions. Two hundred political scientists signed an open letter criticizing the study, saying it should 'not be cited or used in any debate over fraudulent voting.' Harvard's Stephen Ansolabehere, who administered the CCES, published his own peer-reviewed paper lambasting Richman's work. Indeed, by the time Trump read Richman's article onstage in 2016, The Washington Post had already appended a note to the op-ed linking to three rebuttals and a peer-reviewed study debunking the research.
  14. ↑ Hasen, Richard L. (2020). "Chapter 1". Election meltdown: dirty tricks, distrust, and the threat to American democracy. Yale University Press. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, [2020]. ISBN   978-0-300-24819-7.
  15. 1 2 Kasprak, Alex (May 31, 2024). "'New Study' Found 10 to 27% of Noncitizens in US Are Registered to Vote?". Snopes. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
  16. ↑ Weiser, Wendy; Keith, Douglas (February 13, 2017). "The Actually True and Provable Facts About Non-Citizen Voting". TIME. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
  17. ↑ "Fact-Checking Trump's Claims About 'Serious Voter Fraud'". ABC News. November 28, 2016. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
  18. 1 2 3 Graves, Allison. "Trump wrong on percentage of noncitizen voters". @politifact. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
  19. 1 2 Lapowsky, Issie. "Author of Trump's Favorite Voter Fraud Study Says Everyone's Wrong". Wired. ISSN   1059-1028 . Retrieved September 8, 2024.
  20. 1 2 3 Timm, Jane C.; Edelman, Adam (July 19, 2017). "Illegal voting? Not much in Kobach's home state". NBC News. Retrieved September 11, 2024.
  21. ↑ Huseman, Jessica (June 19, 2018). "How the Case for Voter Fraud Was Tested — and Utterly Failed". ProPublica. Retrieved September 9, 2024.
  22. ↑ Hasen, Richard L. (2020). "Chapter 1". Election meltdown: dirty tricks, distrust, and the threat to American democracy. Yale University Press. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, [2020]. ISBN   978-0-300-24819-7.
  23. ↑ Joffe-Block, Jude (October 12, 2024). "6 facts about false noncitizen voting claims and the election". NPR. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
  24. ↑ Kessler, Glenn (March 6, 2024). "Opinion: The truth about noncitizen voting in federal elections". Washington Post. Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University who was skeptical of Richman's earlier research, said in an email that "while the CES data here does look to me to be more reliable than Prof. Richman's prior forays, I'd need some more information before I believed it were reliable." He also said he would be curious to know how many of the noncitizens who registered in Arizona cast ballots, as turnout could be lower than average.
  25. ↑ Kasprak, Alex (May 26, 2024). "'10 to 27%' of Noncitizens in US Are Illegally Registered to Vote?". Snopes. Retrieved September 13, 2024. '[The CES] is not designed to be a sample of noncitizen adults and therefore it is not fit for the purpose of studying that subset of respondents...'There are much better ways to analyze whether noncitizens register to vote,' Schaffner told Snopes. These methods, some of which Richman used in his recent expert reports, involve looking voter rolls and other state records to identify any individuals who appear to be noncitizens. Studies like these, including the Richman expert reports, 'overwhelmingly resulted in finding very few noncitizens registered to vote,' Schaffner told Snopes.
  26. ↑ Richman, Jesse (December 7, 2021). "Opinion: By insisting on the 'Hastert Rule,' the House Freedom Caucus is endangering the GOP". Washington Post (Monkey Cage blog). ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved September 11, 2024.
  27. ↑ Richman, Jesse (September 15, 2016). "Opinion: Trump is right. Let's get moderators out of the debates". Washington Post (Monkey Cage Blog).
  28. ↑ Richman, Jesse (December 7, 2021). "Opinion: How to improve our presidential debates in one easy step: Make the clock a moderator". Washington Post (Monkey Cage Blog). ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved September 11, 2024.
  29. ↑ Richman, Raymond L.; Richman, Howard B.; Richman, Jesse T. (2008). Trading Away Our Future: How to Fix Our Government-Driven Trade Deficits and Faulty Tax System Before it's Too Late. Pittsburgh, Penn: Ideal Taxes Association. ISBN   978-0-929446-05-9. OCLC   229449993.
  30. ↑ Richman, Jesse T.; Richman, Howard B.; Richman, Raymond Leonard (2014). Balanced Trade: Ending the Unbearable Costs of America's Trade Deficits. ISBN   978-0-7391-8880-4.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.