June 2018 Maine Question 1

Last updated

Question 1: People's veto
Do you want to reject the parts of a new law that would delay the use of ranked-choice voting in the election of candidates for any state or federal office until 2022, and then retain the method only if the constitution is amended by December 1, 2021, to allow ranked-choice voting for candidates in state elections?
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes149,90053.88%
Light brown x.svgNo128,29146.12%
Valid votes278,19198.82%
Invalid or blank votes3,3301.18%
Total votes281,521100.00%
June 2018 Maine Question 1 Map by County.svg
Results by counties
Office of the Secretary of State of Maine, Tabulation of Votes

Maine Question 1 was a people's veto referendum that appeared on the June 12, 2018 statewide ballot. It sought to reject a law passed by the Maine Legislature that suspended the implementation of ranked-choice voting, authorized by Maine voters in a previous referendum, for use in Maine elections until and if an amendment to the Maine Constitution is passed to expressly permit it; failing that, the law would be automatically repealed in 2021. It qualified because supporters of the original referendum collected the necessary number of signatures from registered Maine voters. This vote coincided with primary elections in which party nominees for governor, U.S. Senate, U.S. House, and the Maine Legislature were chosen through RCV to run in general elections on November 6.

Contents

The people's veto was passed, with 53.88% of Maine voters voting Yes. This restored ranked choice voting for primary and federal elections.

Background

On November 8, 2016, Maine voters passed Question 5, a citizen referendum to implement ranked-choice voting (RCV). Supporters expected RCV to be in place for 2018's elections, but on May 23, 2017, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court issued an advisory opinion at the request of the Maine Senate [1] stating that RCV in general elections for state offices would be held unconstitutional if it came before the court. [2] The opinion did not affect elections for federal offices or primary elections for state offices. RCV opponents subsequently called for the law establishing RCV to be repealed, while supporters called for a vote on a constitutional amendment to permit the law. On October 23, 2017, the legislature voted to delay implementation of the RCV law for all races until 2021. If a constitutional amendment was not passed by that point, the law would be repealed. [3]

Unhappy with the delay, RCV supporters launched a people's veto signature-gathering effort to prevent it, pointing to RCV's successful use in mixed-race ballots in Portland. On November 6, 2017, the petition forms were approved after Governor Paul LePage waited the full 10 days he is permitted by law to allow the delay to take effect without his signature. [4] [5] On November 12, the effort's leaders said they had collected half the signatures needed and set a goal of finishing by December 15, though by law they had 90 days from when they started. [6]

On February 2, 2018, RCV Maine turned in over 80,000 signatures to Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap for verification. The signatures were gathered despite the coldest weather in years occurring during the gathering period. This suspended the Legislature's delay of RCV pending the outcome of the vote, meaning it would be used in the June primary elections. Dunlap said his office was exploring strategies for implementation of RCV but that it was challenging since the legislature had not given him additional resources. [7]

On March 5, Dunlap announced that approximately 66,000 signatures had been verified, more than the 61,000 needed to place a question on the ballot. [8]

The question that appeared on the ballot was "Do you want to reject the parts of a new law that would delay the use of ranked-choice voting in the election of candidates for any state or federal office until 2022, and then retain the method only if the constitution is amended by December 1, 2021, to allow ranked-choice voting for candidates in state elections?" [9]

RCV status

A people's veto effort suspends the law under dispute until the result of the vote is determined. Supporters asserted this means that the law voters passed in 2016 establishing RCV should be implemented in a manner consistent with the Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruling. On March 29, 2018, Dunlap told a Maine Legislature committee hearing that in this case that means the original law is in effect, requiring the original first-past-the-post system for the upcoming primaries, unless the legislature passes an emergency change to the law or a court tells him otherwise. Dunlap said he needed clarity on the issue by April 2 so overseas ballots could be printed and sent as federal law requires. Passage of a new law seemed unlikely, as it would need a 2/3 vote to pass the legislature as an emergency measure. Maine Attorney General Janet T. Mills urged the legislature to pass a new law, saying that the signers of the people's veto petition should not be thwarted by a technicality. RCV supporters said they would seek a court injunction to order the use of RCV. [10] On April 4, Judge Michaela Murphy ruled that Dunlap should proceed with efforts to implement RCV for the June primaries while the issues with the law are heard by the courts. [11]

In a separate case, the Maine Senate voted 21-13 to direct Senate President Michael Thibodeau to seek intervenor status with the court in the RCV case. Majority Senate Republicans claim that Thibodeau would have standing to intervene as the Senate has a duty to defend the Maine Constitution. They additionally argued that the legislature has not approved funding specifically for RCV, and that chaos could result if losing candidates in elections began to file lawsuits over the use of RCV. Democrats rejected those arguments, stating that Republicans were cherry-picking parts of the Constitution and ignoring the parts that permit citizens to pass laws at the ballot box, and pointed out that Dunlap has the authority and funding to hold elections in general. They added that the Senate is only part of the legislative branch and that more would be needed for standing. [12]

On April 18, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court removed the last legal roadblocks to using RCV in primary elections, upholding the lower court ruling. It also declined to hear Thibodeau's appeal, saying it would not hear a political dispute from one half of one body of the legislature. [13]

On May 4, the Maine Republican Party filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Bangor seeking to bar the use of RCV in its own primary, on the grounds that the party has a First Amendment right to choose its nominee as it sees fit. [14] U.S. District Court Judge Jon Levy rejected the suit on May 29. [15]

Endorsements

Supporters

Opponents

Results

The Bangor Daily News called the vote for the Yes side just after midnight on election night. [26] RCV was subsequently implemented for the November general elections for Maine's two congressional districts.

Breakdown of voting by county
CountyYesVotesNoVotes
Androscoggin 46.88%8,30053.12%9,408
Aroostook 47.25%4,87052.74%5,436
Cumberland 60.39%43,74139.23%28,240
Franklin 48.08%3,10450.63%3,184
Hancock 58.83%8,08441.16%5,657
Kennebec 51.49%13,32148.50%12,548
Knox 59.52%6,06640.47%4,124
Lincoln 54.99%5,32245.00%4,356
Oxford 48.33%5,72951.66%6,124
Penobscot 46.55%11,82053.44%13,567
Piscataquis 42.32%1,37557.67%1,874
Sagadahoc 55.62%4,99644.37%3,985
Somerset 43.38%3,70156.61%4,830
Waldo 56.33%5,23843.66%4,060
Washington 46.19%2,45953.80%2,864
York 54.58%21,63545.41%18,000
UOCAVA 80.34%13919.65%34
Total53.88%149,90046.12%128,291

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in Colorado</span>

Electoral reform in Colorado refers to efforts to change the voting laws in the Centennial State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranked-choice voting in the United States</span> Electoral system used in some cities and states

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) can refer to one of several ranked voting methods used in some cities and states in the United States. The term is not strictly defined, but most often refers to instant-runoff voting (IRV) or single transferable vote (STV), the main difference being whether only one winner or multiple winners are elected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matthew Dunlap</span> American politician from Maine

Matthew Dunlap is an American politician from Maine who has served as the Maine State Auditor since November, 2022, and previously from January to October, 2021. A Democrat, Dunlap served as Secretary of State of Maine from January 7, 2013, to January 4, 2021, and previously served in that same post from 2005 to 2011. In 2012, he sought to become his party's nominee to replace retiring Olympia Snowe, but lost in the primary to State Senator Cynthia Dill. Prior to his first election as secretary of state in 2005, he represented Old Town in the Maine House of Representatives for four terms beginning in 1996. On December 2, 2020, Dunlap was elected Maine State Auditor by the Maine Legislature and took office on January 4, 2021. Dunlap had to vacate the position after failing the exams needed to meet the requirements of the position the following October, and was replaced by Jacob Norton. He did later meet the requirements and was selected for the position again on November 14, 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on same-sex marriage

Maine Question 1 was a voter referendum conducted in Maine in the United States in 2009 that rejected a law legalizing same-sex marriage in the state. The measure passed 53–47% on November 3, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 Maine Question 1</span>

Maine Question 1 (MQ1), "An Act To Prohibit the Use of Dogs, Bait or Traps When Hunting Bears Except under Certain Circumstances", was a citizen-initiated referendum measure in Maine, which was voted on in the general election of November 4, 2014. As the Maine Legislature declined to act on the proposed statute, it was automatically placed on the ballot. The proposal was defeated by 320,873 "No" votes to 279,617 "Yes".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Maine gubernatorial election</span>

The 2018 Maine gubernatorial election took place on November 6, 2018, to elect the governor of Maine. It occurred along with elections for the U.S. Senate, U.S. House, and other state and local elections. Incumbent Republican governor Paul LePage was term-limited and could not seek re-election to a third consecutive term; he later unsuccessfully sought a third term in 2022. This was one of eight Republican-held governorships up for election in a state carried by Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2015 Maine Question 1</span>

Maine Question 1, "An Act To Strengthen the Maine Clean Election Act, Improve Disclosure and Make Other Changes to the Campaign Finance Laws", was a citizen-initiated referendum measure in Maine, which appeared on the November 3, 2015 statewide ballot. As the Maine Legislature did not exercise its ability to pass the bill on its own, it was placed on the ballot and approved by Maine voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Maine Question 5</span> Referendum on instant-runoff voting

Maine Question 5, formally An Act to Establish Ranked-Choice Voting, is a citizen-initiated referendum question that qualified for the Maine November 8, 2016 statewide ballot. It was approved by a vote of 52% in favor, 48% opposed. It sought to change how most Maine elections will be conducted from plurality voting to instant-runoff voting. It appeared on the ballot along with elections for President of the United States, Maine's two U.S. House seats, the legislature, five other ballot questions, and various local elections. The referendum was successful, making Maine the first state to use ranked choice voting for its federal elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum

Maine Question 1, "Do you want to reject the section of Chapter 399 of the Public Laws of 2011 that requires new voters to register to vote at least two business days prior to an election?", was a 2011 people's veto referendum that rejected a bill repealing Election Day voter registration in Maine. The vote was held on November 8, 2011 after being placed on the ballot due to supporters collecting the necessary number of signatures. The veto effort was successful, with 237,024 votes in favor of repeal to 155,156 against repeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Maine Question 4</span>

Maine Question 4, formally An Act to Raise the Minimum Wage, is a citizen-initiated referendum question that appeared on the Maine November 8, 2016 statewide ballot. It sought to increase Maine's minimum wage from $7.50 per hour to $12 an hour by 2020, as well as increasing the minimum wage for tipped employees gradually to the same level by 2024. It would also index increases after 2024 to inflation. As the Maine Legislature and Governor Paul LePage declined to enact the proposal as written, it appeared on the ballot along with elections for President of the United States, Maine's two U.S. House seats, the Legislature, other statewide ballot questions, and various local elections. Efforts to place a competing, more moderate proposal alongside the citizen-initiated bill were unsuccessful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Maine Question 3</span> Citizen-initiated referendum on gun background checks

Maine Question 3, formally An Act to Require Background Checks for Gun Sales, was a citizen-initiated referendum question that appeared on the Maine November 8, 2016 statewide ballot. It sought to require a background check for virtually all gun transfers in Maine, with some exceptions. As the Maine Legislature and Governor Paul LePage declined to enact the proposal as written, it appeared on the ballot along with elections for President of the United States, Maine's two United States House seats, the Maine Legislature, other statewide ballot questions, and various local elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Maine Question 2</span>

Maine Question 2, formally An Act to Establish The Fund to Advance Public Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education, was a citizen-initiated referendum question that appeared on the Maine November 8, 2016 statewide ballot. It sought to increase state aid to public schools by instituting a surcharge of 3% on Maine income taxes for those with income above $200,000 a year. As the Maine Legislature declined to enact the proposal as written, it appeared on the ballot along with elections for President of the United States, Maine's two U.S. House seats, the Legislature, and various local elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Maine Question 1</span> Citizen-initiated referendum to legalize marijuana

Maine Question 1, formally An Act to Legalize Marijuana, is a citizen-initiated referendum question that qualified for the Maine November 8, 2016 statewide ballot. It was qualified for the ballot after a Maine Superior Court judge ordered that petitions rejected by the Maine Secretary of State be reconsidered. The proposal sought to legalize the recreational use of marijuana in Maine for those over the age of 21, and institute a 10 percent tax on its sale. As the Maine Legislature and Governor Paul LePage declined to enact the proposal as written, it appeared on the ballot along with elections for President of the United States, Maine's two U.S. House seats, the Legislature, other statewide ballot questions, and various local elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Maine</span>

Election results in Maine comprise voting for local, gubernatorial and federal public offices, members of the state legislature, as well as ballot measures. Congressional elections are held every even year, and gubernatorial ones every off-presidential even year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 Maine Question 2</span>

Maine Question 2, formally entitled "An Act To Enhance Access to Affordable Health Care", was a citizen-initiated ballot measure that appeared on the November 7, 2017 statewide ballot in the State of Maine. Maine Question 2 sought to expand Medicaid eligibility under the terms of the Affordable Care Act. The measure passed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on allowing casinos in York County

Maine Question 1, formally An Act To Allow Slot Machines or a Casino in York County, was a citizen-initiated referendum question that appeared on the November 7, 2017, statewide ballot in Maine. It sought to award a license for the construction and operation of a casino in York County, Maine by a qualified entity as spelled out in the proposed law, with tax revenue generated by the casino to go to specific programs. The wording of the proposed law effectively permitted only one company, Capital 7, to be awarded the license. The ballot measure was defeated, with 83% of voters opposing it.

Two referendums were placed on the statewide ballot in Maine in 2018. Both were citizen initiated proposals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 2018 Maine Question 1</span>

Maine Question 1 is a citizen-initiated referendum that appeared on the November 6, 2018 statewide ballot. It sought to implement a tax on higher incomes in Maine to fund in-home health care services for elderly and disabled Mainers, as well as to create a government board to administer the funds. The vote coincided with general elections for governor, U.S. Senate, U.S. House, the Maine Legislature, and other local elections. It qualified for the ballot due to supporters collecting signatures from registered Maine voters. It was defeated 62.86% to 37.14%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on religious and philosophical vaccination exemptions

2020 Maine Question 1 was a people's veto referendum that sought to reject a new law which eliminated religious and philosophical exemptions from school vaccination requirements and for employees of nursery schools and health care facilities. The question appeared on the statewide ballot on March 3, 2020, coinciding with the Democratic and Republican presidential primaries for the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Massachusetts Question 2</span>

Massachusetts Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative, also known as Question 2, was an initiative at the 2020 Massachusetts general election that would have changed primaries and elections in Massachusetts from plurality voting to ranked-choice voting (RCV) for all Massachusetts statewide offices, state legislative offices, federal congressional offices, and certain other offices beginning in 2022. RCV would not be extended to elections for president, county commissioner, or regional district school committee member. The initiative failed, with 54.8% of voters voting 'No' and 45.2% 'Yes'.

References

  1. ↑ "Maine Senate Asks High Court for Opinion on Voter-Approved Ranked-Choice Initiative". MPBN. 3 February 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  2. ↑ "Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court". 23 May 2017.
  3. ↑ "Ranked choice voting delayed until 2021". WCSH6.com. 2017-10-23. Retrieved 2017-12-20.[ permanent dead link ]
  4. ↑ "Backers of ranked-choice voting say they'll fight the lawmakers' delay". 23 May 2017.
  5. ↑ "Ranked-choice voting supporters to begin 'people's veto' campaign today". 6 November 2017.
  6. ↑ "Campaign to restore Maine ranked-choice voting collects over half the signatures needed for a people's veto". 12 November 2017.
  7. ↑ "Ranked-choice voters submit signatures for 'people's veto' ballot initiative". 2 February 2018.
  8. ↑ "Mainers To Test Ranked-Choice Voting While Deciding Whether To Keep It". 3 March 2018.
  9. ↑ Department of the Secretary of State, Bureau of Corporations, Elections, and Commissions
  10. ↑ "Dunlap: Ranked-Choice Voting Can't Be Used In June Primaries Unless Lawmakers Or Courts Act". 29 March 2018.
  11. ↑ "Judge orders state to use ranked-choice voting for June primaries, but disputes continue". 4 April 2018.
  12. ↑ "Maine Senate takes unusual step of asking court to hear its concerns about ranked-choice voting". 2 April 2018.
  13. ↑ "Ranked-Choice Voting To Be Implemented For June Primaries, But Political Struggles Continue". 18 April 2018.
  14. 1 2 Leary, Mal (May 4, 2018). "GOP Files Suit To Block Ranked-Choice Voting". MPBN . Retrieved May 7, 2018.
  15. ↑ Leary, Mal (May 29, 2018). "Judge: Maine GOP Must Use Ranked-Choice Voting In Primary". MPBN . Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  16. ↑ "Area representative urges yes vote on Question 1 for Ranked Choice Voting". Piscatiquis Observer. May 24, 2018. Retrieved May 28, 2018.
  17. ↑ "King Says He's Supporting Ranked-Choice Voting Referendum". MPBN . June 5, 2018. Retrieved June 6, 2018.
  18. ↑ "The politicians say no but Jennifer Lawrence says YES ON QUESTION 1. Vote today or on June 12 to protect ranked choice voting". Twitter. May 31, 2018. Retrieved June 1, 2018.
  19. ↑ "Former Republican State Senator Peter Mills supports Ranked Choice Voting". Facebook. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
  20. ↑ "Jill Stein Joins Push to Save Ranked-Choice Voting in Maine". U.S. News & World Report. November 17, 2017. Retrieved May 28, 2018.
  21. ↑ "Our View: There's no trick to ranked-choice voting, so vote 'yes' on Question 1". 2018-06-07.
  22. ↑ "Vote For Me! For Second Place, at Least?". MPBN . June 9, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
  23. ↑ "No on Question 1: Constitutional questions still plague ranked-choice voting". Bangor Daily News . May 25, 2018. Retrieved May 26, 2018.
  24. ↑ "Sen. Ron Collins: Vote no on Question 1 to protect the integrity of Maine elections". Kennebec Journal . June 4, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
  25. ↑ "Governor denounces 'horrific' ranked-choice voting, says he may not certify election results". WCSH 6. June 12, 2018. Retrieved June 12, 2018.
  26. ↑ "Maine again backs ranked-choice voting". Bangor Daily News. June 12, 2018. Retrieved June 13, 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.