2020 California Proposition 14

Last updated
Proposition 14
Flag of California.svg
November 3, 2020 (2020-11-03)

Authorizes Bonds Continuing Stem Cell Research
Location California, United States
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes8,588,15651.09%
Light brown x.svgNo8,221,69248.91%

2020 California Proposition 14 results map by county.svg

California Proposition 14 is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that appeared on the ballot in the 2020 California elections, for November 3, 2020. It authorizes state bonds to be issued worth $5.5 billion, which will fund the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), which serves as the state's center for stem cell research, and enable it to continue its operations. [1] [2] [3] This measure passed with 51% of the vote. [2]

Contents

Background

Human embryonic stem cell colony phase.jpg

Robert N. Klein II, motivated by the suffering of family members from autoimmune diseases, launched a citizen initiative known as Proposition 71 in 2004, which created a state-funded center for stem cell research - the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). [4] Based in San Francisco, the CIRM is responsible for with making grants and loans to stem cell research initiatives focused on developing treatment methods and completing research for clinical trials. [5] Proposition 71 was approved by 59% of California voters and authorized $3 billion in bonds to fund the CIRM in addition to creating a Governing Board of 29 members as an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee (ICOC). [6] By 2020, $2.75 billion of the original $3 billion has been used or earmarked for funding of basic research, infrastructure, education, and clinical translational studies. [7] For this reason, Klein spearheaded this initiative to authorize an additional $5.5 billion in bonds for the CIRM to support additional grants and operations under Proposition 14. [8] Research areas of focus at CIRM include stem cell based research to mitigate or cure serious illness and chronic diseases such as cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, respiratory illnesses including COVID-19, diabetes, cancer, HIV/AIDs, paralysis, blindness, and more. A dedicated $1.5 billion under funding from Proposition 14 will be dedicated to research of diseases specific to the central nervous system and brain, including cancer, autism, dementia, Parkinson's and Alzheimers' disease. [9]

Changes to the CIRM program and governance proposed in Proposition 14 include increased focus in improving patient access to stem cell treatments by expanding sites and facilities for human trials, the requirement for income earned from CIRM agreements to reduce the cost of stem cell treatments for patients, increase the ICOC from 29 members to 35 members, and to hire 15 full-time employees whose roles are dedicated to improving patient access to stem cell-derived therapeutics and treatments. [10] Further, proposition 14 stipulates $1.5 billion to be spent researching brain and nervous system diseases, including dementia and Parkinson's disease. [11] Estimated fiscal impact of Proposition 14 would include the initial $5.5 billion in bonds and $2.5 billion in interest, for an overall annual debt payment of $310 million over 25 years. [10] Proposition 14 appropriates money from the general fund in order to fully pay the bond debt service. [11]

Support

In addition to Klein, this measure is supported by the Regents of the University of California. [2] It was also endorsed by governor Gavin Newsom and The Modesto Bee . [12]

Proponents argue that biomedical research is crucial, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. [13] Proponents of Proposition 14 have raised more than $13.4 million in campaign funds. [14]

Opposition

As with Proposition 71, opposition to Proposition 14 [15] includes many across the political spectrum including the Bakersfield Californian, California Nurses Association, California Catholic Conference, [16] California Republican Party, Center for Genetics and Society, [8] Friends Committee on Legislation of California, Green Party of California, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Libertarian Party of California, Los Angeles Times , Orange County Register, Peace and Freedom Party, Right to Life of Central California, [17] San Bernardino Sun, San Francisco Chronicle, San Jose Mercury News, Scholl Institute of Bioethics, and CIRM board member Jeff Sheehy.

However, there was no significant organized opposition to Proposition 14, and the "No on Proposition 14" committee raised only $250. [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 California Proposition 61</span> 2004 California ballot proposition

Proposition 61 was a California ballot proposition on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 6,629,095 (58.3%) votes in favor and 4,750,309 (41.7%) against. The proposition was the result of an initiative and authorized the sale of $750 million in bonds to provide funding for children's hospitals. It was officially known as the Children's Hospital Bond Act of 2004.

The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) was created in 2004 after 59% of California voters approved California Proposition 71: the Research and Cures Initiative, which allocated $3 billion to fund stem cell research in California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 California Proposition 71</span> California law

Proposition 71 of 2004 is a law enacted by California voters to support stem cell research in the state. It was proposed by means of the initiative process and approved in the 2004 state elections on November 2. The Act amended both the Constitution of California and the Health and Safety Code.

Robert Nicholas "Bob" Klein II is a stem cell advocate. He initiated California Proposition 71, which succeeded in establishing the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, of which Klein was the chairman of the governing board.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 6</span> Rejected statutory initiative

California Proposition 6, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods Act and The Runner Initiative, is a statutory initiative that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. This proposition was rejected by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 3</span> Californian law

Proposition 3 is a law that was enacted by California voters by means of the initiative process. It is a bond issue that authorizes $980 million in bonds, to be repaid from state's General Fund, to fund the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping of children's hospitals. The annual payment on the debt authorized by the initiative is approximately $64 million a year. Altogether, the measure would cost about $1.9 billion over 30 years out of California's general fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 5</span> 2008 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 5, or the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act was an initiated state statute that appeared as a ballot measure on the November 2008 ballot in California. It was disapproved by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 10</span> Ballot measure in California

California Proposition 10, also known as the California Alternative Fuels Initiative, was an unsuccessful initiated state statute that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. Proposition 10 was funded by Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a corporation owned by T. Boone Pickens. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is the nation's leading operator of natural gas vehicle fueling stations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 12</span>

Proposition 12 appeared on the November 4, 2008 ballot in California. It is also known as the Veterans' Bond Act of 2008. The measure was legislatively referred to the ballot in Senate Bill 1572. The primary sponsor of SB 1572 was Senator Mark Wyland, R-Carlsbad. The vote to place the measure on the ballot was passed unanimously in both the California state senate (39-0) and assembly (75-0).

Consumer Watchdog is a non-profit, progressive organization which advocates for taxpayer and consumer interests, with a focus on insurance, health care, political reform, privacy and energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 California Proposition 39</span> Ballot measure in California modifying corporate tax burdens

Proposition 39 is a ballot initiative in the state of California that modifies the way out-of-state corporations calculate their income tax burdens. The proposition was approved by voters in the November 6 general election, with 61.1% voting in favor of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 51</span> 2016 California ballot proposition

Proposition 51 is a California ballot proposition that passed on the November 8, 2016 ballot, regarding $9 billion in bonds to fund construction and improvement of K-12 and community college facilities. The measure designates $7 billion for K-12 projects falling under four types of projects, and $2 billion for any facility project for community colleges. No other bond measures related to education have been on the California ballot since 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California elections</span>

The California state elections in 2020 were held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Unlike previous election cycles, the primary elections were held on Super Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California elections</span>

California state elections in 2018 were held on Tuesday, November 6, 2018, with the primary elections being held on June 5, 2018. Voters elected one member to the United States Senate, 53 members to the United States House of Representatives, all eight state constitutional offices, all four members to the Board of Equalization, 20 members to the California State Senate, and all 80 members to the California State Assembly, among other elected offices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 6</span> Failed amendment to the Constitution of California

California Proposition 6 was a measure that was submitted to California voters as part of the November 2018 election. The ballot measure proposed a repeal of the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which is also known as Senate Bill 1. The measure failed with about 57% of the voters against and 43% in favor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 12</span> Ballot measure in California requiring certain space requirements for farm animals

Proposition 12 was a California ballot proposition in that state's general election on November 6, 2018. The measure was self-titled the Prevention of Cruelty to Farm Animals Act. The measure passed, by a vote of about 63% Yes to 37% No.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 13</span> $15 billion bond initiative for educational facility maintenance

Proposition 13 was a failed California proposition on the March 3, 2020, ballot that would have authorized the issuance of $15 billion in bonds to finance capital improvements for public and charter schools statewide. The proposition would have also raised the borrowing limit for some school districts and eliminated school impact fees for multifamily housing near transit stations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 California Proposition 68</span>

California Proposition 68 was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that appeared on ballots in California in the June primary election in 2018. It was a $4.1bn bond measure to fund parks, environmental projects, water infrastructure projects and flood protection measures throughout California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 California Proposition 30</span>

Proposition 30 is a California ballot proposition that appeared in the general election on November 8, 2022. The measure was defeated. The initiative would have raised taxes on the wealthy to fund wildfire management and electric vehicle incentives and infrastructure.

References

  1. "California gears up for blockbuster year of ballot measures". politico.com. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
  2. 1 2 3 "California Proposition 14, Stem Cell Research Institute Bond Initiative (2020)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
  3. Colliver, Victoria. "California stem cell initiative qualifies for the November ballot". Politico PRO. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
  4. "2020 Proposition 14: Will California Continue Stem Cell Research?". Words & Deeds. 2020-07-13. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
  5. Ballotpedia, "California Proposition 14, Stem Cell Research Institute Bond Initiative (2020)," https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_14,_Stem_Cell_Research_Institute_Bond_Initiative_(2020).
  6. aholden (2015-02-27). "History". California's Stem Cell Agency. Retrieved 2020-09-04.
  7. "California's stem cell bet: Lofty promises, limited results". The San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2020-09-04.
  8. 1 2 Trefny, Ben (21 July 2020). "California Proposition 14: Stem Cell Research Bond". www.kalw.org. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
  9. The California Stem Cell Research, Treatments, and Cures Initiative of 2020 (PDF) (Report). November 2019.
  10. 1 2 "Stem cell research. [Ballot]". lao.ca.gov. Retrieved 2020-09-04.
  11. 1 2 "Proposition 14: Stem Cell Research Bond | The Rose Institute of State and Local Government". roseinstitute.org. Retrieved 2020-11-08.
  12. "Newsom endorses California's $5.5 billion stem cell measure". Capitol Weekly. 2020-09-12. Retrieved 2020-09-22.
  13. "Accelerating COVID-19 Vaccine Development - Yes on Prop 14". Californians for Stem Cell Research, Treatments & Cures. Retrieved 2020-07-26.
  14. 1 2 Cowan, Jill (2020-10-15). "What Proposition 14 Tells Us About California". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2020-10-17.
  15. "November 3, 2020 California Ballot Proposition Endorsements".[ permanent dead link ]
  16. Holman, Jim (2020-08-24). "Calif. bishops say no to Prop. 14 on November ballot". California Catholic Daily. Retrieved 2020-10-20.
  17. Gerardi, John (13 July 2020). "Prop 14: Vote No". righttolifeca.org. Retrieved 2020-07-26.