Earthjustice

Last updated
Earthjustice
Founded1971;53 years ago (1971)
Founder
  • Phil Berry
  • Fred Fisher
  • Don Harris
Type 501(c)(3) non-profit
Focus Environmentalism, Public health
Headquarters San Francisco, California, United States
Area served
Within the United States and internationally
MethodLitigation
President
Abigail Dillen [1]
Employees
Approx. 300 [2]
Website earthjustice.org
Formerly called
Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund; Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund

Earthjustice (originally Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund) is a nonprofit public interest organization based in the United States dedicated to litigating environmental issues. Headquartered in San Francisco, they have an international program, a communications team, and a policy and legislation team in Washington, D.C., [3] along with 14 regional offices across the United States.

Contents

The organization was founded in 1971 as the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, though it was fully independent from the Sierra Club. The name was changed to Earthjustice in 1997. This was thought to better reflect its role as a legal advocate which represents hundreds of regional, national and international organizations. As of September 2018, the group has provided free legal representation to more than 1,000 clients ranging from the Sierra Club, World Wildlife Fund, American Lung Association, as well as smaller state and community groups, such as the Maine Lobstermen's Association and the Friends of the Everglades. [4]

Earthjustice is a nonprofit organization, meaning the legal service they provide is free for their clients. Funding for the organization comes from donations. It does not receive any funding from corporations or governments. In 2021, Earthjustice made $154 million in total revenue and $100 million in total expenditures. [5] As of 2021, Earthjustice has full-time staff of about 170 attorneys [6] in 14 offices across the United States, and 14 public-interest lobbyists [7] based in Washington, D.C. They are involved in 630 active legal proceedings. [8] The current president of Earthjustice is Abigail Dillen, [9] an environmental attorney who first joined Earthjustice in 2000 and was previously Vice President of Litigation for Climate and Energy. [10] [11]

Programs

Earthjustice's work is divided into three key goal areas: [8]

Earthjustice also partners with organizations from other regions, including Latin America, Russia, Japan, and China to promote the development of environmental law in their respective countries. Every year, Earthjustice submits a country-by-country report on Human Rights and the Environment to the United Nations. [15]

Impact on U.S. environmental law

Earthjustice has been a critical player in a number of important, precedent-setting cases regarding environmental protection in the United States.

In the 1972 Supreme Court case Sierra Club v. Morton , Earthjustice (then known as the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund) helped establish the right of citizens to sue for environmental damages. The case ultimately forced the Walt Disney Company to drop its plans to develop an enormous ski resort in the Mineral King valley in California's Sierra Nevada Range. The lawsuit blocked any further development or private use of the land which has since been incorporated into the Sequoia National Park. [16]

In 1993, the organization (still then known as the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund) filed a lawsuit to block the development of the New World gold-silver-copper mine that was planned to be sited about four miles from the northeast entrance to Yellowstone National Park. The lawsuit was a victory in that the district judge ruled that not only could the subsidiary mining company (in this case Crown Butte Mines, Inc., a Montana company) who holds the mining claims and is developing the mine plan, but even the parent corporation (in this case Noranda Corporation, a Canadian company), could be held liable for violations of the Federal Clean Water Act (Ekey, 1997). [17]

In 1998, Earthjustice helped local community groups convince the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to withdraw an approval to construct a uranium enrichment plant between two low-income, predominantly African-American communities near Homer, Louisiana. It was the first time a government agency had formally embraced the principle of 'environmental justice" in its decision-making. [18]

In the 2006 Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency , Earthjustice attorneys helped a coalition of state governments and conservation groups force the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to fight global warming by limiting greenhouse gas emissions. It was the first Supreme Court case to ever address the issue of climate change. [19]

Other suits have been less successful:

In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the US Navy in a suit brought in part by Earthjustice, which ordered Navy personnel to stop the use of certain types of sonar if a marine mammal such as a dolphin or whale was sighted within 2,200 yards. Among other details, the court noted that in 40 years of such sonar training there had not been a documented case of injury or death to a marine mammal that could be directly attributed to the sonar. [20]

In 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a suit against the EPA with the goal of banning the pesticide Chlorpyrifos. The court ruled that an environmental coalition, including Earthjustice, failed to follow procedure by filing the suit with the court before filing their appeal of a 2007 EPA ruling allowing the pesticide. [21] [22] However, on August 9, 2018, the court ruled that chlorpyrifos must be banned within 60 days from that date [23]

Legislative positions

Marketing

In 2010, Earthjustice launched a fundraising campaign using the location-based social networking app Foursquare. The ad campaign, which ran in billboards in San Francisco's BART system, gained national recognition as one of the first successful nonprofit uses of Foursquare. This success was featured in media outlets such as The New York Times , Mashable, and MacLife magazine, as well as books such as Carmine Gallo's The Power of Foursquare. [26] [27] [28] [29]

Recognition

In 2001, Worth magazine, aimed at high-income Americans, named Earthjustice as one of America's 100 best charities. [30]

Since April 1, 2009, Charity Navigator has given Earthjustice 4 stars, the oversight group's highest rating. [31]

In December 2014, the organization was recognized for its tagline "Because the earth needs a good lawyer", [32] which was chosen in a 2009 online contest as one of the best nonprofit taglines out of 1,702 entries.[ citation needed ]

Earthjustice has come under criticism for actions that are described as radical or counterproductive. Kevin Mooney of the right-leaning Capital Research Center writes that Earthjustice has represented a wide range of clients and causes, ranging from those well within the political and scientific mainstream to "radical fringe groups with a reputation for outrageous claims and uncompromising positions." [33]

Similarly, Fargo, North Dakota, columnist Rob Port has described Earthjustice as fundamentally "obstructionist" in their strategy against the Dakota Access Pipeline during 2016. [34]

See also

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chlorpyrifos</span> Chemical compound

In organic chemistry, chlorpyrifos (CPS), also known as chlorpyrifos ethyl, is an organophosphate pesticide that has been used on crops, animals, and buildings, and in other settings, to kill several pests, including insects and worms. It acts on the nervous systems of insects by inhibiting the acetylcholinesterase enzyme. Chlorpyrifos was patented in 1966 by Dow Chemical Company.

Environmental Defense Fund or EDF is a United States-based nonprofit environmental advocacy group. The group is known for its work on issues including global warming, ecosystem restoration, oceans, and human health, and advocates using sound science, economics and law to find environmental solutions that work. It is nonpartisan, and its work often advocates market-based solutions to environmental problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States environmental law</span> US environmental policy

United States environmental law concerns legal standards to protect human health and improve the natural environment of the United States. While subject to criticism at home and abroad on issues of protection, enforcement, and over-regulation, the country remains an important source of environmental legal expertise and experience.

Jed Saul Rakoff is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy (CREA) was a Republican environmental organization founded in 1998 by Gale Norton, who in 2001 became George W. Bush's U.S. Secretary of the Interior. CREA "evolved from a group" Italia Federici and Norton founded in 1997 "with tax activist Grover Norquist to push for Republican environmental goals." The organization's steering committee included lobbyists for the petroleum, mining, and auto manufacturing industries. The organization's president, Italia Federici, pleaded guilty in 2007 to obstructing the U.S. Senate investigation into the Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal and for siphoning CREA funds for personal use. Abramoff donated more than $400,000 to her charity, after which time she began using her connections with J. Steven Griles, to influence him to make decisions beneficial to Abramoff's tribal benefactors. Later in 2007, CREA's vice president, Jared Carpenter, pleaded guilty of tax evasion for also diverting CREA funds for personal use.

<i>Massachusetts v. EPA</i> 2007 United States Supreme Court case

Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), is a 5–4 U.S. Supreme Court case in which Massachusetts, along with eleven other states and several cities of the United States, represented by James Milkey, brought suit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) represented by Gregory G. Garre to force the federal agency to regulate the emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) that pollute the environment and contribute to climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scott Pruitt</span> American lawyer and politician (born 1968)

Edward Scott Pruitt is an American attorney, lobbyist and Republican politician from the state of Oklahoma. He served as the 14th Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from February 17, 2017, to July 9, 2018, during the Donald Trump presidency, resigning while under at least 14 federal investigations. Pruitt denies the scientific consensus on climate change.

In the United States, a legal defense fund is an account set up to pay for legal expenses, which can include attorneys' fees, court filings, litigation costs, legal advice, or other legal fees. The fund can be public or private and is set up for individuals, organizations, or for a particular purpose. These funds are often used by government public officials, civil rights organizations, and public interest organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Appalachian Voices</span>

Appalachian Voices is an American environmental organization. Their stated environmental concerns include eliminating air pollution, ending mountaintop removal, cleaning up coal ash pollution and promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency.

A New Source Review (NSR) is a permitting process created by the US Congress in 1977 as part of a series of amendments to the Clean Air Act. The NSR process requires industry to undergo an Environmental Protection Agency pre-construction review for environmental controls if they propose either building new facilities or any modifications to existing facilities that would create a "significant increase" of a regulated pollutant. The legislation allowed "routine scheduled maintenance" to not be covered in the NSR process. Since the terms "significant increase" and "routine scheduled maintenance" were never precisely defined in legislation, they have become a source of contention in many lawsuits filed by the EPA, public interest groups, and utilities.

The Interamerican Association for Environmental Defense (AIDA) is a non-profit international environmental law organization founded in 1996 by a collaboration of five environmental organizations in the Americas including Earthjustice.

Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) is an Australian NGO that encourages, funds, and provides lawyers and legal support for litigation, law reform, and community engagement on climate change and environmental issues. EDO formed in late 2019 with the merger of eight separate state and territory organisations into one national organisation. Topics of interest to EDO include: climate change, biodiversity, water, and healthy communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environment America</span> U.S. federation of state-based environmental advocacy groups

Environment America is a federation of state-based environmental advocacy organizations in the United States. The organization researches and advocates for environmental policies through lobbying, litigation, and the mobilization of public support. Environment America advocates new laws and policies to address climate change, air pollution and water pollution, and is a proponent of clean energy, while opposing offshore drilling.

Peter Lehner is an American lawyer and environmentalist. He leads a sustainable food and farming program at Earthjustice, developing strategies to reduce harmful effects of food production on climate, human health and the environment, and to promote a more ecologically sound agricultural system. He coauthored the book In Deep Water, about the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, with Bob Deans.

<i>Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp.</i> 2007 United States Supreme Court case

Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation, 549 U.S. 561 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that while a term may be used more than once in a statute, an agency has the discretion to interpret each use of the term in a different way based on the context. In a unanimous decision, the court held in favor of the plaintiff's argument.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental policy of the Donald Trump administration</span> Environmental policy as enforced by the Donald Trump administration

The environmental policy of the Donald Trump administration represented a shift from the policy priorities and goals of the preceding Barack Obama administration. Where President Obama's environmental agenda prioritized the reduction of carbon emissions through the use of renewable energy with the goal of conserving the environment for future generations, the Trump administration policy was for the US to attain energy independence based on fossil fuel use and to rescind many environmental regulations. By the end of Trump's term, his administration had rolled back 98 environmental rules and regulations, leaving an additional 14 rollbacks still in progress. As of early 2021, the Biden administration was making a public accounting of regulatory decisions under the Trump administration that had been influenced by politics rather than science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change litigation</span> Use of legal practice to further climate change mitigation

Climate change litigation, also known as climate litigation, is an emerging body of environmental law using legal practice to set case law precedent to further climate change mitigation efforts from public institutions, such as governments and companies. In the face of slow politics of climate change delaying climate change mitigation, activists and lawyers have increased efforts to use national and international judiciary systems to advance the effort. Climate litigation typically engages in one of five types of legal claims: Constitutional law, administrative law, private law (challenging corporations or other organizations for negligence, nuisance, etc., fraud or consumer protection, or human rights.

Abigail Dillen is an environmental lawyer and executive at the environmental justice organization Earthjustice. Her work has been called "precedent setting" by multiple climate organizations. This includes, for example, defending the roadless rule. She was profiled as a 2020 changemaker by Marie Claire.

West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court relating to the Clean Air Act, and the extent to which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can regulate carbon dioxide emissions related to climate change.

References

  1. "New Earthjustice Prez's Game Plan". Law360. 2 July 2018. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
  2. Our Team
  3. "Offices". 25 October 2019.
  4. Earthjustice Clients and Coalitions
  5. Earthjustice Financial Statements
  6. Earthjustice litigation staff
  7. Earthjustice Policy & Legislation staff
  8. 1 2 Earthjustice: Our Work
  9. Earthjustice Names Abigail Dillen as New President
  10. "Abigail Dillen". Earthjustice. 2010-04-08. Retrieved 2021-05-17.
  11. "People: Dillen named new president of Earthjustice." InsideEPA. 28 June 2018. Retrieved 30 September 2018.
  12. "The Wild [node:field-marquee-collection:field_marquee_header_second]". 2 December 2013.
  13. "Healthy Communities". 9 December 2013.
  14. Earthjustice: Right To Zero
  15. Earthjustice International Program
  16. Finally -- The Valley of Mineral King Becomes Wilderness Archived 2010-08-15 at the Wayback Machine , EarthJustice
  17. Ekey, Bob (1997). "The New World Agreement: A Call for Reform of the 1872 Mining Law". Public Land and Resources Law Review, Volume 18. Archived from the original on 2020-03-18. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  18. Earthjustice: Uranium Enrichment Plant Stopped Archived 2008-12-12 at the Wayback Machine
  19. Earthjustice: Massachusetts v. EPA
  20. Winter vs. National Resources Defense Council No. 07–1239., October term, 2008
  21. Timothy Cama (2017) Court rejects greens’ appeal of EPA decision not to ban pesticide, TheHill.com; accessed 08 December 2017
  22. Jessica Domel Judge denies petition to ban chlorpyrifos pesticide, Texas Farm Bureau, 19 July 2017; accessed 08 December 2017
  23. "What Is the Insecticide Chlorpyrifos?". Environment. 2018-08-10. Archived from the original on August 11, 2018. Retrieved 2020-07-06.
  24. "CBO - H.R. 2279". Congressional Budget Office. 26 June 2013. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
  25. "House Subcommittee Votes Increase Coal Ash Exposure, Threaten Public Health". Earthjustice. 6 June 2013. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
  26. Woody, Todd (19 October 2010). "With Foursquare, Ads Let You Check In at Your Favorite Billboard". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  27. Van, Jennifer (27 May 2010). "Non-Profit Uses Foursquare to Raise Environmental Awareness". Mashable.com. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  28. Delio, Michelle (January 2011). "iGIVE". MacLife. p. 16. Available via SlideShare [ permanent dead link ]. Retrieved 18 March 2018.
  29. "The Power of foursquare". Gallo Communications. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  30. "WORTH Magazine Names America's 100 Best Charities - and Highlights 12 Worth Avoidng". Business Wire. 29 November 2001. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
  31. "Charity Navigator - Historical Ratings for Earthjustice". Charity Navigator. Retrieved 2019-12-18.
  32. Fritz, Joanne (6 December 2014). "Nonprofit Taglines and Mission Statements". Nonprofit.about.com. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
  33. Kevin Mooney (2009). EarthJustice Legal Defense Fund: How Environmentalism Weakens U.S. National Security; accessed 08 December 2017
  34. "Earthjustice isn't out to promote safe, responsible oil and gas development, goals all reasonable people share. They don't want a safe pipeline, per se. Rather, they're out to choke oil and gas development to death by obstructing energy infrastructure with legal maneuvering." Port, Rob (2016). Standing Rock Tribe Should Ditch Earthjustice if They Want Pipeline Lawsuit Taken Seriously, accessed 08 December 2017