AFSCME Local 77, Duke University

Last updated
AFSCME Local 77
AFSCME Local 77, Duke University
PredecessorDuke Employees Benevolent Society
FoundedAugust 1965 (1965-08)
Headquarters Duke University
Location
  • USA
Affiliations American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Website www.local-77.org

The Local 77 chapter of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is a Duke University labour union established in August 1965. It initially began as the Duke Employees Benevolent Society in February 1965, led by Oliver Harvey. The formation of Local 77 was directed towards improving work conditions for the working-class employees, most of whom were African-American. Members fought for minimum wage increases, improvements in working conditions, and medical benefits for employees. The union members of Local 77 demanded a systematic way of dealing with workplace complaints that was impartial to the Duke University administration. Because the majority of the union's members were African-American, several of the goals overlapped with the ideas of the Civil Rights Movement.

Contents

Historical context

The first steps towards inclusion of black Durham residents in the work force occurred during World War II, when the federal government reluctantly allowed black workers to fill up open job positions in Durham, left by those who went to fight in the war. What seemed like a promising step towards civil rights efforts faded as soldiers returned at the end of the war to reclaim their positions in society. Both black men and women lost their factory jobs at the shutdown of several major wartime plants that were no longer needed post-war. [1] The demand for black employees during the war had an impact on Oliver Harvey, who later led Local 77's organizational effortes.

Oliver Harvey

Born in Franklinton, North Carolina, a small textile and tobacco town, Harvey grew up alongside his father, who owned his own land, which was very uncommon for black farmers in the 1930s. When his tenants stole from his property, Harvey's father lost his land. Refusing to join the sharecropping business, Harvey looked for work in Durham. In 1936, Harvey found a job at the American Tobacco Company, where the segregated unions troubled him. In a journal article about his father, the younger Harvey wrote, “I got my hatred for segregation from my father. He was raised in the house of a white couple, two liberal lawyers. He learned to always speak up for himself.” In 1943, Harvey worked at the Krueger Bottling Company in Durham where he successfully led efforts to integrate the segregated black and white unions. During the black union protest against the segregated pay scales, forty-four out of the forty-five whites in the plant joined the black union in their strike. [2] Eight years later, Harvey began work as a night time janitor at Duke University where he encountered a discouraging atmosphere for social change. Duke was a segregated school at the time, as all Southern institutions were, and was not integrated until 1963. Even following integration, racial inequality still existed during the Civil Rights Movement. Black workers were to address students by “Mister” and “Miss,” though the reverse was not required of the students. Harvey's confrontation with a student who objected to this rule led to the end of this practice. [3] His insistence for more respect towards university workers suggested that the goals of the labour union extended beyond the need for fair wages, but also for independence, credibility, and authority, matching the goals of the Civil Rights Movement at the time.

Conflicts leading up to unionization

While Duke University's reputation grew as a national educational institution, its attitudes towards black workers remained unchanged. The same year the Duke Employees Benevolent Society was established in 1965, Duke revealed a new $200 million plan to promote Duke's status as a top national university. The funds were used to advance the renovation of new libraries, science research labs, and more modern facilities. [4] Despite Duke University's reputation as an institution for higher education and its growing expertise in preparing its students for the professional society, the working environments and attitudes towards black, blue-collar workers had not changed. Workers were not given health insurance, received little pay, had inconsistent and demanding schedules, often working ten to twelve days without a day off, and were treated unprofessionally. One nurse's maid, Helen Johnstone, recalled being treated like a servant: “When I was a nurse’s maid, our second head nurse, Joan Ashley, she used to run me everywhere—uptown to get the immunizations and to put them in my refrigerator. She had me run to the library to return her books for her on time.” [5] It was not unusual for black workers to be treated this way, especially as a result of unclear job descriptions that gave those with higher power control over the tasks assigned to black workers.

The administration initially denied the union recognition. While the university discouraged the formation of labour unions, arguing that “it can do more ‘for’ the employee than a union,” Local 77 denounced this idea as “deepening the basic problem,” suggesting that “employees need to have a voice in their own future; and that voice can only come through collective bargaining...Only then may employees negotiate and sign a contract as mutual, equal participants rather than dependents of a paternal employer with unilateral decision-making power. Only then will the psychology of dependence be overcome.” [6] The black work force had little power in the grievance procedures.

Union conflicts and its societal effects

Hattie Williams, Viola Watson, and the opposition toward labour unions

The cases of Hattie Williams and Viola Watson highlighted the difficulties of labour organizing on Duke's campus. Initially, unionization efforts had little effect on working conditions because of a historically unwelcoming environment for labour unions, and the resulting lack of recognition by the university's entire population. At first, employees attained only minor improvements in pay, and a new grievance procedure easily manipulated by management and administrators. [7] In the case of Hattie Williams and Viola Watson, members involved with Local 77 and African-American housekeepers who had worked for at least four years, were fired without warning in the winter of 1966. Both workers received no complaints about the quality of their work. However, both previously involved themselves in the Local 77 movement; Williams was a Union Steward and Watson had picketed for higher wages with the union. [8] They used the grievance procedure to reclaim their positions in the university. However, only Hattie Williams was returned to her job while Watson was denied permission to her previous position. [9] The Local 77 Statement of Policy pointed out the inconsistency of the present Duke policies ruling out previous segregationist practices, as discrimination still existed, and believed it was too easy “for lower Management to work in clear violation of the University’s avowed policy.” [10] The last step of the grievance procedure, a meeting between three members of the Personnel Policy Committee closely tied to the university, claimed to be “perfectly objective in rendering a final decision” for the Williams and Watson case. However, in his letter to university president Douglas Knight, Harvey proposed that “if Duke truly wishes to be fair in its dealings with employees, a disinterested third party should constitute the final appeal on grievances.” [11] The primary goal of Local 77 was to gain impartial arbitration as a way to settle disputes objectively, allowing the participation of a third party to discern final judgments.

Shirley Ramsey: garnering student and faculty support

Despite initial failures and the slow progress of Local 77's new campaign, Local 77 gained momentum as they received more support from students and faculty. In the spring of 1966, Shirley Ramsey, one of the first black food service workers to be promoted to cashier, was requested by a supervisor to perform pie-cutting duties in the dining hall, a task outside the range of her job description. When Ramsey refused the supervisor's request, she was fired from her job. Consequently, Ramsey filed a claim through the grievance procedure, believing that race was a determining factor for the reason that she was singled out by her employer to perform a task outside of her job description. [12] In the midst of the Civil Rights Movement, the issue of race as a factor in Ramsey's case attracted the support of students and faculty, along with media coverage. The union submitted a letter to the editor for The Chronicle, explaining details surrounding the controversy of Ramsey's firing. Many Duke students who were also involved in the work setting as part-time workers wore buttons to show their support. Despite the overwhelming support, the judges of Ramsey's case rejected her complaint at the last stage and denied the association of race with her firing, stating that “successful operation of the dining halls depended upon the willingness of the employees to respond to rapidly changing situations caused by the very nature of the business.” [13] Cleverly avoiding the matter from the standpoint of race relations, the administration solely regarded the relocation of Ramsey as a matter of employee compliance to their supervisors. Nevertheless, the collective effort of the entire Duke community behind Ramsey's case encouraged workers to continue challenging the work conditions based on race.

Iola Woods: union representation in grievance procedures

Motivated by the widespread community support, Local 77 continued to fight against an apathetic and blatantly racist administration. In response to a faculty supporter's letter urging him to comply with the black workers' demands, university president Douglas Knight denied any support stating, "It is far more important both for the University and the region to make certain that salaries continue to rise for more skilled people than those who receive minimum compensation" and continues to propose an offensive solution to the problem by "eliminating employees who can work only at a minimum level of effectiveness." [14] Knight responded as if their low-class jobs were a privilege, implying the incompetency of black workers for minimum wage working conditions.

Not soon afterwards, the university hired the Alexander Proudfoot Corporation, an efficiency firm, whose goal was to reduce university operating costs especially in the service and clerical sectors, including the jobs held by black workers. [15] When workloads increased by an average of 81 percent, complaints from workers resulted. Among those complaints was Iola Woods, a dormitory maid who was assigned to clean 12 rooms, empty the trash of 24 rooms, and clean two dorm bathrooms in one hour and twenty minutes. This led 42 maids to file grievances with the administration for modifications in their workload. In support of the maids’ protests, student and faculty supporters established a committee, the Students, Faculty, and Friends of Local 77 (SFFL), which assisted the labour union in its fight for fair work conditions. [16] During an investigation of work conditions, three students unsuccessfully tried to complete the work assigned to maids. [17] Furthermore, the SFFL examined the maids’ work schedules for inconsistencies, and found that they had significantly more tasks at different times of the day. [18] The SFFL continued to raise awareness for the need of impartial arbitration. When the administration offered no response to the SFFL proposals for impartial arbitration, union members began picketing in spring of 1967 outside the administrative building and Duke Medical Centre. After a week of protests, the university finally agreed to negotiations with Local 77 in establishing a new grievance panel that included the participation of a third party. The union had the ability to choose one out of the three members on the panel. [19] While this process was still biased towards administration, this was the first step towards future improvement.

Silent Vigil and worker demands

After the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, the Duke community gathered together during the Silent Vigil to raise awareness for racial equality on campus, presenting an opportunity for Local 77 to accentuate both their workplace and racial equality concerns. Duke students, faculty, and administration immersed in social equality reflections and negotiations over university policies protecting these rights. Local 77's participation in the Silent Vigil contributed to the issue of race relations as a whole. As Rees Shearer eloquently described the role of Local 77's presence at the Vigil, “In reflection, I think we needed Local #77 more than they needed us. We needed a way to express regret, to dissociate ourselves from the assassination and to try to do something right about the dominant issue of our nation: race.” [20] This had been an issue long avoided by the Duke community and the divided nation.

Motivated by the struggle for social equality, more than a thousand students and faculty demonstrated on the campus quad, boycotting the dining halls. [21] Workers picketed for a $1.60 minimum wage, collective bargaining rights, and an impartial grievance procedure. [22] After a strike that lasted for thirteen days, attracting national media attention, the administration complied with requests to raise the minimum wage. However, the administration continued to refuse collective bargaining rights. Instead, they implemented the Duke University Employees Advisory Committee, a faculty committee that negotiated with non-academic workers. This included the participation of “twelve technical and clerical worker representatives along with twelve service and maintenance worker representatives.” [23]

Recognition by the University

In fall of 1970, the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) gave workers the right to form unions in private universities. However, the NLRB ruling only granted collective bargaining rights to non-hospital workers. At the time, Local 77 was composed of both hospital and campus service workers, and hospital workers strongly supported Local 77. Several hospital workers in Local 77 held manual tasks that did not involve patient care, and in the end, the ruling permitted these workers for union representation. By 1971, Duke voluntarily agreed to the unionization of both housekeeping and laundry workers in the medical centre and campus workers. Harvey perceived this as Duke's strategy for preventing future unionizing pressure from other food and service workers in the medical centre. After the long enduring fight for fair working conditions, Local 77 finally received union recognition in January, 1972. [24]

Following the Civil Rights Movement, most students held liberal views on social equality issues. However, student support decreased by a change in the general student body's “embrace of a liberal individualist theology.” [25] This followed the idea that the younger generation found more meaning in one-to-one environments rather than working through a matter systematically and questioning institutional policies. This was seemingly demonstrated when the university discussed the privatization of dining services in 1998. The introduction of fast-food chains on campus oftentimes refused hiring employees affiliated with labour unions, reducing the demand for unionized labour that Local 77 represented. More than 80 percent of the student body favored the administration's proposal, despite the fact that the primarily black work force would be earning less than Durham's living wage. [26]

While the Local 77 movement in the 1960s succeeded in extending racial equality towards the predominantly black labor unions, the lack of student support in the following years hindered further improvements for a demographic group with much less power than Duke's administration. Nowhere was this more apparent than in the unsuccessful unionization drives at Duke University's hospital.

Although public support had decreased, Local 77 built a strong foundation for itself in its campaign during the 1960s. The labor union reached its goals of attaining higher pay, fair treatment in the workplace, and showing that they were “a force within the very institution that had marginalized them.” [27]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strike action</span> Work stoppage by employees

Strike action, also called labor strike, labour strike and industrial action in British English, or simply strike, is a work stoppage caused by the mass refusal of employees to work. A strike usually takes place in response to employee grievances. Strikes became common during the Industrial Revolution, when mass labor became important in factories and mines. As striking became a more common practice, governments were often pushed to act. When government intervention occurred, it was rarely neutral or amicable. Early strikes were often deemed unlawful conspiracies or anti-competitive cartel action and many were subject to massive legal repression by state police, federal military power, and federal courts. Many Western nations legalized striking under certain conditions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Collective bargaining is a process of negotiation between employers and a group of employees aimed at agreements to regulate working salaries, working conditions, benefits, and other aspects of workers' compensation and rights for workers. The interests of the employees are commonly presented by representatives of a trade union to which the employees belong. A collective agreement reached by these negotiations functions as a labour contract between an employer and one or more unions, and typically establishes terms regarding wage scales, working hours, training, health and safety, overtime, grievance mechanisms, and rights to participate in workplace or company affairs. Such agreements can also include 'productivity bargaining' in which workers agree to changes to working practices in return for higher pay or greater job security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters</span> American labor organisation

Founded in 1925, The Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters and Maids, commonly referred to as the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters (BSCP), was the first labor organization led by African Americans to receive a charter in the American Federation of Labor (AFL). The BSCP gathered a membership of 18,000 passenger railway workers across Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

Justice for Janitors (JfJ) is a social movement organization that fights for the rights of janitors across the US and Canada. It was started on June 15, 1990, in response to the low wages and minimal health-care coverage that janitors received. Justice for Janitors includes more than 225,000 janitors in at least 29 cities in the United States and at least four cities in Canada. Members fight for better wages, better conditions, improved healthcare, and full-time opportunities.

The Graduate Student Organizing Committee (GSOC) is a labor union representing graduate teaching and research assistants at New York University (NYU).

The Temple University Graduate Students Association (TUGSA) is a graduate employee union that is located at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the United States.

Community unionism, also known as reciprocal unionism, refers to the formation of alliances between unions and non-labour groups in order to achieve common goals. These unions seek to organize the employed, unemployed, and underemployed. They press for change in the workplace and beyond, organizing around issues such as welfare reform, health care, jobs, housing, and immigration. Individual issues at work are seen as being a part of broader societal problems which they seek to address. Unlike trade unions, community union membership is not based on the workplace- it is based on common identities and issues. Alliances forged between unions and other groups may have a primary identity based on affiliations of religion, ethnic group, gender, disability, environmentalism, neighborhood residence, or sexuality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Graduate student employee unionization</span> Labor unions representing university-employed students

Graduate student employee unionization, or academic student employee unionization, refers to labor unions that represent students who are employed by their college or university to teach classes, conduct research and perform clerical duties. As of 2014, there were at least 33 US graduate employee unions, 18 unrecognized unions in the United States, and 23 graduate employee unions in Canada. By 2019, it is estimated that there were 83,050 unionized student employees in certified bargaining units in the United States. As of 2023, there were at least 156 US graduate student employee unions and 23 graduate student employee unions in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Labor relations</span> Study of work and workers

Labor relations or labor studies is a field of study that can have different meanings depending on the context in which it is used. In an international context, it is a subfield of labor history that studies the human relations with regard to work in its broadest sense and how this connects to questions of social inequality. It explicitly encompasses unregulated, historical, and non-Western forms of labor. Here, labor relations define "for or with whom one works and under what rules. These rules determine the type of work, type and amount of remuneration, working hours, degrees of physical and psychological strain, as well as the degree of freedom and autonomy associated with the work." More specifically in a North American and strictly modern context, labor relations is the study and practice of managing unionized employment situations. In academia, labor relations is frequently a sub-area within industrial relations, though scholars from many disciplines including economics, sociology, history, law, and political science also study labor unions and labor movements. In practice, labor relations is frequently a subarea within human resource management. Courses in labor relations typically cover labor history, labor law, union organizing, bargaining, contract administration, and important contemporary topics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Memphis sanitation strike</span> 1968 American strike

The Memphis sanitation strike began on February 12, 1968, in response to the deaths of sanitation workers Echol Cole and Robert Walker. The deaths served as a breaking point for more than 1,300 African American men from the Memphis Department of Public Works as they demanded higher wages, time and a half overtime, dues check-off, safety measures, and pay for the rainy days when they were told to go home.

A wildcat strike is a strike action undertaken by unionised workers without union leadership's authorization, support, or approval; this is sometimes termed an unofficial industrial action. The legality of wildcat strikes varies between countries and over time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees</span> American labor union of public employees

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) is the largest trade union of public employees in the United States. It represents 1.3 million public sector employees and retirees, including health care workers, corrections officers, sanitation workers, police officers, firefighters, and childcare providers. Founded in Madison, Wisconsin, in 1932, AFSCME is part of the AFL–CIO, one of the two main labor federations in the United States. AFSCME has had four presidents since its founding.

The Graduate Employees' Organization at UIUC (GEO) is a labor union created to defend and extend the bargaining and employment rights of Graduate Employees at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC).

Theresa El-Amin is an African-American civil rights activist, union organizer and former member of the Green Party of the United States Steering Committee.

Oliver Harvey was an African American janitor at Duke University and founding president of the Local 77 chapter of American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO. He spearheaded the movement to unionize Duke University employees during the 1960s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teaching Assistants Association</span> Wisconsin graduate student employee union

The Teaching Assistants Association (TAA) is a graduate student employee union formed at the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1966. It is credited as the first graduate student labor union. Following voluntary recognition by the university as the teaching assistants' bargaining agent in 1969, negotiations resulted in a 1970 strike, which secured "bread-and-butter" gains such as job security alongside grievance procedures. Their major unmet demand from their strike—the inclusion of teaching assistants and students in the course planning process—went unfulfilled. The TAA struck again in 1980 and lost its union recognition until 1986. The union's protest at the Wisconsin State Capitol building began the 2011 Wisconsin protests.

Immediately following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., the Silent Vigil was a social protest at Duke University that not only demanded collective bargaining rights for AFSCME Local 77, the labor union for nonacademic employees, but also advocated against racial discrimination on campus and in the surrounding community of Durham, North Carolina. Occurring from April 4, 1968, to April 12, 1968, members of the University Christian Movement began planning a campus-wide vigil in memoriam of Dr. King. Another group of undergraduate students called for a protest march to address prevalent issues concerning the primarily African-American nonacademic employees at Duke in Local 77. Together, both student groups, along with the support of Local 77, most of the teaching faculty, and civilians not affiliated with the university, sparked a non-violent demonstration that involved over 2,000 participants, making it the largest in Duke's history. The Silent Vigil stands out from other contemporary college movements due to the collaboration between primarily white students and faculty, and mainly African-American workers. Furthermore, unlike rowdier protests at the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University, Duke's Silent Vigil received considerable praise for its peaceful approach, especially considering its surrounding Southern backdrop. Inspired by the Civil Rights Movement, the Silent Vigil not only aimed to externally change Duke's white, privileged, and apathetic image in the eyes of the Durham community, but also internally set a powerful precedent on Duke's campus for student activism in the future.

The Duke University Hospital unionization drives of the 1970s involved two distinct organizing efforts aimed at uniting the service workers of Duke Hospital. The drives were defined by their fusion of the fight for worker’s rights with the battle for racial equality. The first drive in 1974 was characterized by unity amongst the workers involved, including members of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 77, and a strong spirit of activism, but failed due to political infighting and resistance by the University. The second drive, organized by a representative of the national American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) in 1978, was formed on the ideals of inclusion and keeping the union free of politics. The 1978 drive failed as well, in part due to the management company that Duke hired to instill fear in its workers, and partly due to the overall lack of spirit for organizing. Despite the failure of these drives, they offer a revealing example of the convergence of civil rights and workers rights, highlighting both the status of the civil rights movement in Durham and the difficulty of instigating grassroots-level change in a corporation the size of Duke Hospital, not to mention the larger Duke University community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regina Polk</span> American labor leader (1950–1983)

Regina Victoria Polk was an American labor leader and an activist for women workers in Chicago during the 1970s and 1980s. She was first an organizer and then a business agent for Local 743, the largest local in the International Brotherhood of Teamsters at that time. Throughout her career, she campaigned to organize and then represent clerical workers in predominantly female workplaces.

Shelton Tappes was an American labor organizer and civil rights activist, known for his role in drafting and negotiating the anti-discrimination clause included in the first contract between Ford Motor Company and the United Auto Workers (UAW.)

References

  1. ↑ Karen Brodkin, Caring by the Hour: Women, Work, and Organizing at Duke Medical Center(Urbana: University of Illinois, 1988), 39.
  2. ↑ "Oliver Harvey: Got to Take Some Risks." Southern Exposure 6 (1978): n. pag. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.
  3. ↑ "Oliver Harvey: Got to Take Some Risks."
  4. ↑ Erik Ludwig, "Closing in on the Plantation: Coalition Building and the Role of Black Women's Grievances in Duke University Labor Disputes, 1965-1968," Feminist Studies 25.1 (1999): 79-94, accessed March 18, 2014.
  5. ↑ Brodkin, Caring by the Hour, 44.
  6. ↑ Why Local 77, Box 1, Labor Unions Reference Collection, 1958-2001, Rubenstein Library, Duke University.
  7. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 81.
  8. ↑ Statement of Policy, Box 1, Labor Unions Reference Collection, 1958-2001, Rubenstein Library, Duke University.
  9. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 81.
  10. ↑ Statement of Policy, Labor Unions Reference Collection.
  11. ↑ A Newsletter from Duke Employees Local 77, Box 1, Labor Unions Reference Collection, 1958-2001, Rubenstein Library, Duke University.
  12. ↑ Christina Greene, Our Separate Ways: Women and the Black Freedom Movement in Durham, North Carolina (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2005), 107.
  13. ↑ Letter from John M. Dozier to Shirley Ramsey, Box 1, Labor Unions Reference Collection, 1958-2001, Rubenstein Library, Duke University.
  14. ↑ “Knight to Strange letter, March 11, 1965,” Duke University Archives, Sect.25, John Strange folder, as quoted in Brodkin, Caring by the Hour, 48.
  15. ↑ Brodkin, Caring by the Hour, 49.
  16. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 85.
  17. ↑ The Need for Impartial Arbitration of Labor Disputes at Duke University, Box 1, Labor Unions Reference Collection, 1958-2001, Rubenstein Library, Duke University.
  18. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 85.
  19. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 86.
  20. ↑ Bridget Booher, “Remembering the Silent Vigil,” Duke Magazine, March–April 1998.
  21. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 89.
  22. ↑ Brodkin, Caring by the Hour, 52.
  23. ↑ Brodkin, Caring by the Hour, 53.
  24. ↑ Brodkin, Caring by the Hour, 55-56.
  25. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 82.
  26. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 91.
  27. ↑ Ludwig, “Closing in on the Plantation,” 92.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.