ATAC-seq

Last updated

ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing) is a technique used in molecular biology to assess genome-wide chromatin accessibility. [1] In 2013, the technique was first described as an alternative advanced method for MNase-seq, FAIRE-Seq and DNase-Seq. [1] ATAC-seq is a faster analysis of the epigenome than DNase-seq or MNase-seq. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Description

ATAC-seq identifies accessible DNA regions by probing open chromatin with hyperactive mutant Tn5 Transposase that inserts sequencing adapters into open regions of the genome. [2] [5] While naturally occurring transposases have a low level of activity, ATAC-seq employs the mutated hyperactive transposase. [6] In a process called "tagmentation", Tn5 transposase cleaves and tags double-stranded DNA with sequencing adaptors. [7] [8] The tagged DNA fragments are then purified, PCR-amplified, and sequenced using next-generation sequencing. [8] Sequencing reads can then be used to infer regions of increased accessibility as well as to map regions of transcription factor binding sites and nucleosome positions. [2] The number of reads for a region correlate with how open that chromatin is, at single nucleotide resolution. [2] ATAC-seq requires no sonication or phenol-chloroform extraction like FAIRE-seq; [9] no antibodies like ChIP-seq; [10] and no sensitive enzymatic digestion like MNase-seq or DNase-seq. [11] ATAC-seq preparation can be completed in under three hours. [12]

Applications

Applications of ATAC-Seq ATAC-Seq application v2.pdf
Applications of ATAC-Seq

ATAC-Seq analysis is used to investigate a number of chromatin-accessibility signatures. The most common use is nucleosome mapping experiments, [3] but it can be applied to mapping transcription factor binding sites, [13] adapted to map DNA methylation sites, [14] or combined with sequencing techniques. [15]

The utility of high-resolution enhancer mapping ranges from studying the evolutionary divergence of enhancer usage (e.g. between chimps and humans) during development [16] and uncovering a lineage-specific enhancer map used during blood cell differentiation. [17]

ATAC-Seq has also been applied to defining the genome-wide chromatin accessibility landscape in human cancers, [18] and revealing an overall decrease in chromatin accessibility in macular degeneration. [19] Computational footprinting methods can be performed on ATAC-seq to find cell specific binding sites and transcription factors with cell specific activity. [13]

Single-cell ATAC-seq

Modifications to the ATAC-seq protocol have been made to accommodate single-cell analysis. Microfluidics can be used to separate single nuclei and perform ATAC-seq reactions individually. [12] With this approach, single cells are captured by either a microfluidic device or a liquid deposition system before tagmentation. [12] [20] An alternative technique that does not require single cell isolation is combinatorial cellular indexing. [21] This technique uses barcoding to measure chromatin accessibility in thousands of individual cells; it can generate epigenomic profiles from 10,000-100,000 cells per experiment. [22] But combinatorial cellular indexing requires additional, custom-engineered equipment or a large quantity of custom, modified Tn5. [23] Recently, a pooled barcode method called sci-CAR was developed, allowing joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression of single cells. [24]

Computational analysis of scATAC-seq is based on construction of a count matrix with number of reads per open chromatin regions. Open chromatin regions can be defined, for example, by standard peak calling of pseudo bulk ATAC-seq data. Further steps include data reduction with PCA and clustering of cells. [20] scATAC-seq matrices can be extremely large (hundreds of thousands of regions) and is extremely sparse, i.e. less than 3% of entries are non-zero. [25] Therefore, imputation of count matrix is another crucial step performed by using various methods such as non-negative matrix factorization. As with bulk ATAC-seq, scATAC-seq allows finding regulators like transcription factors controlling gene expression of cells. This can be achieved by looking at the number of reads around TF motifs [26] or footprinting analysis. [25]

Related Research Articles

Epigenomics is the study of the complete set of epigenetic modifications on the genetic material of a cell, known as the epigenome. The field is analogous to genomics and proteomics, which are the study of the genome and proteome of a cell. Epigenetic modifications are reversible modifications on a cell's DNA or histones that affect gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. Epigenomic maintenance is a continuous process and plays an important role in stability of eukaryotic genomes by taking part in crucial biological mechanisms like DNA repair. Plant flavones are said to be inhibiting epigenomic marks that cause cancers. Two of the most characterized epigenetic modifications are DNA methylation and histone modification. Epigenetic modifications play an important role in gene expression and regulation, and are involved in numerous cellular processes such as in differentiation/development and tumorigenesis. The study of epigenetics on a global level has been made possible only recently through the adaptation of genomic high-throughput assays.

H3K27ac is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H3. It is a mark that indicates acetylation of the lysine residue at N-terminal position 27 of the histone H3 protein.

H3K9me3 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the tri-methylation at the 9th lysine residue of the histone H3 protein and is often associated with heterochromatin.

H3K4me1 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the mono-methylation at the 4th lysine residue of the histone H3 protein and often associated with gene enhancers.

H3K36me3 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the tri-methylation at the 36th lysine residue of the histone H3 protein and often associated with gene bodies.

H3K79me2 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the di-methylation at the 79th lysine residue of the histone H3 protein. H3K79me2 is detected in the transcribed regions of active genes.

H4K20me is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H4. It is a mark that indicates the mono-methylation at the 20th lysine residue of the histone H4 protein. This mark can be di- and tri-methylated. It is critical for genome integrity including DNA damage repair, DNA replication and chromatin compaction.

H4K5ac is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H4. It is a mark that indicates the acetylation at the 5th lysine residue of the histone H4 protein. H4K5 is the closest lysine residue to the N-terminal tail of histone H4. It is enriched at the transcription start site (TSS) and along gene bodies. Acetylation of histone H4K5 and H4K12ac is enriched at centromeres.

H4K8ac, representing an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H4, is a mark indicating the acetylation at the 8th lysine residue of the histone H4 protein. It has been implicated in the prevalence of malaria.

H4K91ac is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H4. It is a mark that indicates the acetylation at the 91st lysine residue of the histone H4 protein. No known diseases are attributed to this mark but it might be implicated in melanoma.

H3K23ac is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the acetylation at the 23rd lysine residue of the histone H3 protein.

H3K36me2 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the di-methylation at the 36th lysine residue of the histone H3 protein.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MNase-seq</span> Sk kasid Youtuber

MNase-seq, short for micrococcal nuclease digestion with deep sequencing, is a molecular biological technique that was first pioneered in 2006 to measure nucleosome occupancy in the C. elegans genome, and was subsequently applied to the human genome in 2008. Though, the term ‘MNase-seq’ had not been coined until a year later, in 2009. Briefly, this technique relies on the use of the non-specific endo-exonuclease micrococcal nuclease, an enzyme derived from the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, to bind and cleave protein-unbound regions of DNA on chromatin. DNA bound to histones or other chromatin-bound proteins may remain undigested. The uncut DNA is then purified from the proteins and sequenced through one or more of the various Next-Generation sequencing methods.

H3K36me is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein Histone H3, specifically, the mono-methylation at the 36th lysine residue of the histone H3 protein.

H3R42me is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the mono-methylation at the 42nd arginine residue of the histone H3 protein. In epigenetics, arginine methylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with a more accessible chromatin structure and thus higher levels of transcription. The existence of arginine demethylases that could reverse arginine methylation is controversial.

H3R17me2 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the di-methylation at the 17th arginine residue of the histone H3 protein. In epigenetics, arginine methylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with a more accessible chromatin structure and thus higher levels of transcription. The existence of arginine demethylases that could reverse arginine methylation is controversial.

H3R26me2 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the di-methylation at the 26th arginine residue of the histone H3 protein. In epigenetics, arginine methylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with a more accessible chromatin structure and thus higher levels of transcription. The existence of arginine demethylases that could reverse arginine methylation is controversial.

H3R8me2 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the di-methylation at the 8th arginine residue of the histone H3 protein. In epigenetics, arginine methylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with a more accessible chromatin structure and thus higher levels of transcription. The existence of arginine demethylases that could reverse arginine methylation is controversial.

H3R2me2 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H3. It is a mark that indicates the di-methylation at the 2nd arginine residue of the histone H3 protein. In epigenetics, arginine methylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with a more accessible chromatin structure and thus higher levels of transcription. The existence of arginine demethylases that could reverse arginine methylation is controversial.

H4R3me2 is an epigenetic modification to the DNA packaging protein histone H4. It is a mark that indicates the di-methylation at the 3rd arginine residue of the histone H4 protein. In epigenetics, arginine methylation of histones H3 and H4 is associated with a more accessible chromatin structure and thus higher levels of transcription. The existence of arginine demethylases that could reverse arginine methylation is controversial.

References

  1. 1 2 Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (December 2013). "Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position". Nature Methods. 10 (12): 1213–8. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2688. PMC   3959825 . PMID   24097267.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (January 2015). "ATAC-seq: A Method for Assaying Chromatin Accessibility Genome-Wide". Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 109: 21.29.1–21.29.9. doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb2129s109. PMC   4374986 . PMID   25559105.
  3. 1 2 Schep AN, Buenrostro JD, Denny SK, Schwartz K, Sherlock G, Greenleaf WJ (November 2015). "Structured nucleosome fingerprints enable high-resolution mapping of chromatin architecture within regulatory regions". Genome Research. 25 (11): 1757–70. doi:10.1101/gr.192294.115. PMC   4617971 . PMID   26314830.
  4. ↑ Song L, Crawford GE (February 2010). "DNase-seq: a high-resolution technique for mapping active gene regulatory elements across the genome from mammalian cells". Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2010 (2): pdb.prot5384. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5384. PMC   3627383 . PMID   20150147.
  5. ↑ Bajic M, Maher KA, Deal RB (2018). "Identification of Open Chromatin Regions in Plant Genomes Using ATAC-Seq". Plant Chromatin Dynamics. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1675. pp. 183–201. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7318-7_12. ISBN   978-1-4939-7317-0. ISSN   1064-3745. PMC   5693289 . PMID   29052193.
  6. ↑ Reznikoff WS (2008). "Transposon Tn5". Annual Review of Genetics. 42 (1): 269–86. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091656. PMID   18680433.
  7. ↑ Adey, Andrew (December 2010). "Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition". Genome Biology. 11 (12): R119. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r119 . PMC   3046479 . PMID   21143862.
  8. 1 2 Picelli S, Björklund AK, Reinius B, Sagasser S, Winberg G, Sandberg R (December 2014). "Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects". Genome Research. 24 (12): 2033–40. doi:10.1101/gr.177881.114. PMC   4248319 . PMID   25079858.
  9. ↑ Simon JM, Giresi PG, Davis IJ, Lieb JD (January 2012). "Using formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements (FAIRE) to isolate active regulatory DNA". Nature Protocols. 7 (2): 256–67. doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.444. PMC   3784247 . PMID   22262007.
  10. ↑ Savic D, Partridge EC, Newberry KM, Smith SB, Meadows SK, Roberts BS, et al. (October 2015). "CETCh-seq: CRISPR epitope tagging ChIP-seq of DNA-binding proteins". Genome Research. 25 (10): 1581–9. doi:10.1101/gr.193540.115. PMC   4579343 . PMID   26355004.
  11. ↑ Hoeijmakers WA, Bártfai R (2018). "Characterization of the Nucleosome Landscape by Micrococcal Nuclease-Sequencing (MNase-seq)". Chromatin Immunoprecipitation. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1689. pp. 83–101. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7380-4_8. ISBN   978-1-4939-7379-8. ISSN   1064-3745. PMID   29027167.
  12. 1 2 3 Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Litzenburger UM, Ruff D, Gonzales ML, Snyder MP, et al. (July 2015). "Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation". Nature. 523 (7561): 486–90. Bibcode:2015Natur.523..486B. doi:10.1038/nature14590. PMC   4685948 . PMID   26083756.
  13. 1 2 Li, Zhijian; Schulz, Marcel H.; Look, Thomas; Begemann, Matthias; Zenke, Martin; Costa, Ivan G. (26 February 2019). "Identification of transcription factor binding sites using ATAC-seq". Genome Biology. 20 (1): 45. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1642-2 . PMC   6391789 . PMID   30808370.
  14. ↑ Spektor R, Tippens ND, Mimoso CA, Soloway PD (June 2019). "methyl-ATAC-seq measures DNA methylation at accessible chromatin". Genome Research. 29 (6): 969–977. doi:10.1101/gr.245399.118. PMC   6581052 . PMID   31160376.
  15. ↑ Hendrickson DG, Soifer I, Wranik BJ, Botstein D, Scott McIsaac R (2018), "Simultaneous Profiling of DNA Accessibility and Gene Expression Dynamics with ATAC-Seq and RNA-Seq", Computational Cell Biology, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1819, Springer New York, pp. 317–333, doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8618-7_15, ISBN   9781493986170, PMID   30421411
  16. ↑ Prescott SL, Srinivasan R, Marchetto MC, Grishina I, Narvaiza I, Selleri L, et al. (September 2015). "Enhancer divergence and cis-regulatory evolution in the human and chimp neural crest". Cell. 163 (1): 68–83. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.036. PMC   4848043 . PMID   26365491.
  17. ↑ Lara-Astiaso D, Weiner A, Lorenzo-Vivas E, Zaretsky I, Jaitin DA, David E, et al. (August 2014). "Immunogenetics. Chromatin state dynamics during blood formation". Science. 345 (6199): 943–9. doi:10.1126/science.1256271. PMC   4412442 . PMID   25103404.
  18. ↑ Corces MR, Granja JM, Shams S, Louie BH, Seoane JA, Zhou W, et al. (October 2018). "The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers". Science. 362 (6413): eaav1898. Bibcode:2018Sci...362.1898C. doi:10.1126/science.aav1898. PMC   6408149 . PMID   30361341.
  19. ↑ Wang J, Zibetti C, Shang P, Sripathi SR, Zhang P, Cano M, et al. (April 2018). "ATAC-Seq analysis reveals a widespread decrease of chromatin accessibility in age-related macular degeneration". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 1364. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.1364W. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03856-y. PMC   5893535 . PMID   29636475.
  20. 1 2 Mezger A, Klemm S, Mann I, Brower K, Mir A, Bostick M, et al. (September 2018). "High-throughput chromatin accessibility profiling at single-cell resolution". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 3647. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.3647M. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05887-x. PMC   6128862 . PMID   30194434.
  21. ↑ Cusanovich, Darren (May 2015). "Multiplex single cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing". Science. 348 (6237): 910–914. Bibcode:2015Sci...348..910C. doi:10.1126/science.aab1601. PMC   4836442 . PMID   25953818.
  22. ↑ Lareau CA, Duarte FM, Chew JG, Kartha VK, Burkett ZD, Kohlway AS, Pokholok D, Aryee MJ, et al. (2019). "Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive scale single-cell epigenomics". bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/612713 .
  23. ↑ Chen X, Miragaia RJ, Natarajan KN, Teichmann SA (December 2018). "A rapid and robust method for single cell chromatin accessibility profiling". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 5345. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.5345C. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07771-0. PMC   6297232 . PMID   30559361.
  24. ↑ Cao, Junyue; Cusanovich, Darren A.; Ramani, Vijay; Aghamirzaie, Delasa; Pliner, Hannah A.; Hill, Andrew J.; Daza, Riza M.; McFaline-Figueroa, Jose L.; Packer, Jonathan S.; Christiansen, Lena; Steemers, Frank J. (2018-09-28). "Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in thousands of single cells". Science. 361 (6409): 1380–1385. Bibcode:2018Sci...361.1380C. doi: 10.1126/science.aau0730 . ISSN   0036-8075. PMC   6571013 . PMID   30166440.
  25. 1 2 Li Z, Kuppe C, Cheng M, Menzel S, Zenke M, Kramann R, et al. (2021). "Chromatin-accessibility estimation from single-cell ATAC-seq data with scOpen". Nature Communications. 12 (1): 865931. Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.6386L. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26530-2 . PMC   8568974 . PMID   34737275.
  26. ↑ Schep AN, Wu B, Buenrostro JD, Greenleaf WJ (October 2017). "chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data". Nature Methods. 14 (10): 975–978. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4401. PMC   5623146 . PMID   28825706.

External source

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.