Administrative Review Tribunal

Last updated
Administrative Review Tribunal
Administrative Review Tribunal.png
Agency overview
Formed14 October 2024 (14 October 2024)
Preceding agency
JurisdictionFlag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia
Minister responsible
Agency executive
Parent department Attorney-General's Department
Key document
Website art.gov.au

The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) is an Australian tribunal that conducts independent merits review of administrative decisions made under Commonwealth laws of the Australian Government. The ART reviews decisions made by Australian Government ministers, departments and agencies, and in limited circumstances, decisions made by state government and non-government bodies. They also review decisions made under Norfolk Island laws. It is not a court and not part of the Australian court hierarchy; however, its decisions are subject to review by the Federal Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. [1] The ART was established by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 [2] and started operation on 14 October 2024. The ART replaces the now abolished Administrative Appeal Tribunal.

Contents

Origins

Abolition of the AAT

Public support in the AAT declined in the years before its abolition, [3] with self-represented participants rating the independence of the AAT in a user survey at 3.5 out of a maximum of 5. This was much lower than the ratings given by legal practitioners (4.4/5) and government agencies (4.8/5). Former President, Justice Gary Downes, suggested that the results indicated "individual applicants see the Tribunal as a continuum in the decision making process and not necessarily as an independent body". [4]

Prior to its abolition on 14 October 2024, 70 of the 320 (22%) AAT members had a direct political connection to the government that appointed them, and were, on average, appointed for longer terms than members without political affiliations. [5] In comparison, across all other Australian Government public appointees, only 7% had direct political connections to the government that appointed them. [5]

In March 2022, the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee reported on the performance and integrity of the administrative review system in Australia. The report found that the AAT: [6]

On 16 December 2022, Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus announced that the Australian Government would abolish the AAT, and that "the AAT's public standing has been irreversibly damaged as a result of the actions of the former government over the last nine years." [7] Claims made by Mark Dreyfus in support of abolishing the AAT included that former Liberal MPs, candidates, staffers and associates had been appointed to the AAT without any merit-based selection process. [7]

Formation

The ART was established by the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 and commenced operations on 14 October 2024. The intention of creating the ART was to do so in response to recommendations by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee report on the performance and integrity of the administrative review system, published in March 2022. [8] The report recommended the abolition of the AAT and the establishment of a new body, with a transparent, merit-based appointment process. [6]

Organisation

The ART manages their workload by reference to jurisdictional areas, currently being: [9]

Jurisdictional AreaJurisdictional Area LeaderList
General Gina Lazanas Child Support
Information and Other
Intelligence and SecurityJustice Emilios KyrouIntelligence and Security
Migration Kate Millar Study, Visitor and Other Visas
Family and Partner Visas
Working, Skilled and Investment Visas
Character, Citizenship and Bridging Visas
National Disability Insurance Scheme Kruna Dordevic Plans
Access
Protection Simone Burford China
India
Malaysia
Vietnam
Africa, Americas, Middle East and South Asia Countries
Social SecurityKruna Dordevic Centrelink
Paid Parental Leave
Taxation and BusinessGina LazanasTaxation
Regulation and Discipline
Veterans' and Workers' CompensationGina LazanasVeretans
Workers' Compensation

Jurisdiction

The ART has jurisdiction to review a decision if the individual statute empowering the Australian Government agency allows for an application to be referred to a review tribunal, [10] of which the ART estimates there to be more than 400 statutes that do so. [11]

The Tribunal is not a court. The High Court has long held that the Australian Constitution, mandates a separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. [12] [13] Judicial review of administrative decisions takes place in courts, such as the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit Court. The ART remains part of the executive branch of government.

In addition to new powers, the ART also retains the same powers and procedures that the AAT held. [8]

Structure

The ART consists of the President and the other members who may be appointed as:

The President is responsible for the overall management of the Tribunal with the assistance of Division Heads and the Registrar. Staff are employed under the Public Service Act 1999 (Cth) to assist the ART to carry out its functions.

A Chief Executive Officer and Principal Registrar is a statutory officer appointed by the governor-general. The current chief executive officer and Principle Registrar is Michael Hawkins. The Chief Executive Officer and Principle Registrar is the accountable authority under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth) and agency head for the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999 (Cth). [9]

The President of the ART must be a judge of the Federal Court of Australia. The ART's other members may be:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duncan Kerr</span> Australian politician

Duncan James Colquhoun Kerr, SC is a barrister. He is a former justice of the Federal Court of Australia. He also served as President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal from 2012 to 2017.

The Australian Government, also known as the Commonwealth Government or simply as the Federal government, is the national executive government of Australia, a federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The executive consists of the prime minister and other cabinet ministers that currently have the support of a majority of the members of the House of Representatives and also includes the departments and other executive bodies that ministers oversee. The current executive government consists of Anthony Albanese and other ministers of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), in office since the 2022 federal election.

<i>R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers Society of Australia</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia, known as the Boilermakers' Case, was a 1956 decision of the High Court of Australia which considered the powers of the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration to punish the Boilermakers' Society of Australia, a union which had disobeyed the orders of that court in relation to an industrial dispute between boilermakers and their employer body, the Metal Trades Employers' Association.

The judiciary of Australia comprises judges who sit in federal courts and courts of the States and Territories of Australia. The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the Australian court hierarchy as the ultimate court of appeal on matters of both federal and State law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory</span> Superior court of the Australian Capital Territory, Australia

The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory is the highest court of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). It has unlimited jurisdiction within the territory in civil matters and hears the most serious criminal matters.

The separation of powers in Australia is the division of the institutions of the Australian government into legislative, executive and judicial branches. This concept is where legislature makes the laws, the executive put the laws into operation, and the judiciary interprets the laws; all independently of each other. The term, and its occurrence in Australia, is due to the text and structure of the Australian Constitution, which derives its influences from democratic concepts embedded in the Westminster system, the doctrine of "responsible government" and the United States version of the separation of powers. However, due to the conventions of the Westminster system, a strict separation of powers is not always evident in the Australian political system, with little separation between the executive and the legislature, with the executive required to be drawn from, and maintain the confidence of, the legislature; a fusion.

Australian administrative law defines the extent of the powers and responsibilities held by administrative agencies of Australian governments. It is basically a common law system, with an increasing statutory overlay that has shifted its focus toward codified judicial review and to tribunals with extensive jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Administrative Appeals Tribunal</span> Australian tribunal

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) was an Australian tribunal that conducted independent merits review of administrative decisions made under Commonwealth laws of the Australian Government. The AAT reviewed decisions made by Australian Government ministers, departments and agencies, and in limited circumstances, decisions made by state government and non-government bodies. They also reviewed decisions made under Norfolk Island laws. It is not a court and not part of the Australian court hierarchy; however, its decisions were subject to review by the Federal Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The AAT was established by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 and started operation in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Dreyfus</span> Australian politician

Mark Alfred Dreyfus is an Australian politician and lawyer who has been attorney-general of Australia and cabinet secretary since June 2022, having held both roles previously in 2013 and from 2010 to 2013 respectively. Dreyfus is a member of the Australian Labor Party (ALP), and has been the MP for Isaacs since the 2007 election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal, and court of final appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are binding on all other courts in a nation and are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts. A supreme court can also, in certain circumstances, act as a court of original jurisdiction.

The National Native Title Tribunal (NNTT) is an independent body established under the Native Title Act 1993 in Australia as a special measure for the advancement and protection of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It manages applications for and administration of native title in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribunals in the United Kingdom</span> Specialist courts in the United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, a tribunal is a specialist court with jurisdiction over a certain area of civil law. They are generally designed to be more informal and accessible than 'traditional' courts.

<i>Drake v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs</i>

Drake v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs, was a 1979 decision of the Federal Court of Australia dealing with drugs, deportation and judicial roles.

Ombudsmen in Australia are independent agencies who assist when a dispute arises between individuals and industry bodies or government agencies. Government ombudsman services are free to the public, like many other ombudsman and dispute resolution services, and are a means of resolving disputes outside of the court systems. Australia has an ombudsman assigned for each state; as well as an ombudsman for the Commonwealth of Australia. As laws differ between states just one process, or policy, cannot be used across the Commonwealth. All government bodies are within the jurisdiction of the ombudsman.

Susan Coralie Kenny AM is a reserve judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria, a former Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, and before that was a Judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria, where she was the first woman to serve on the Court of Appeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977</span>

Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which created the ability to appeal the decision at the Federal Court of Australia for a person or other parties affected by most administrative decisions by an Australian federal department or agency. Review of administrative decisions under the Act is limited to matters of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commonwealth Industrial Court</span> Former Court of Australia, replaced by the Federal Court of Australia

The Commonwealth Industrial Court, known as the Australian Industrial Court from 1973, was a specialist court to deal with industrial matters, principally the enforcement of awards and orders of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission. Over time it took on more matters and its judges were allocated a wide range of judicial tasks until it was replaced in 1977 by the Federal Court of Australia which had a more general jurisdiction covering matters arising under Australian federal law.

The Federal Court of Bankruptcy was an Australian court that was established in 1930, pursuant to Chapter III of the Constitution. The jurisdiction in bankruptcy was shared with state courts. On 1 February 1977 the bankruptcy jurisdiction was transferred to the newly established Federal Court of Australia. No new cases could commence in the Federal Court of Bankruptcy after 1 February 1977, however the Court was not formally abolished until 1995, after the last judge, Charles Sweeney retired.

Judicial independence is regarded as one of the foundation values of the Australian legal system, such that the High Court held in 2004 that a court capable of exercising federal judicial power must be, and must appear to be, an independent and impartial tribunal. Former Chief Justice Gerard Brennan described judicial independence as existing "to serve and protect not the governors but the governed", albeit one that "rests on the calibre and the character of the judges themselves". Despite general agreement as to its importance and common acceptance of some elements, there is no agreement as to each of the elements of judicial independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alan Robertson (judge)</span> Australian judge

Alan Robertson is a former judge of the Federal Court of Australia. He served as a deputy president of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, and retired from the Court in May 2020 having reached the mandatory retirement age for federal judicial appointments.

References

  1. Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth) s 172
  2. Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth)
  3. Bedford, Narelle (10 April 2019). "AAT: Importance, Independence and Appointments". Australian Public Law Blog.
  4. O'Connor, Pamela (2013), Tribunal Independence (PDF), Melbourne, Victoria: Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration, p. 14, ISBN   9780959002935 .
  5. 1 2 Wood, Danielle; Griffiths, Kate; Stobart, Anika (17 July 2022). "New politics: A better process for public appointments" (PDF). Grattan Institute. Retrieved 30 October 2024.
  6. 1 2 Karr, Kim (March 2022), The performance and integrity of Australia's administrative review system, Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Commitee
  7. 1 2 Dreyfus, Mark (16 December 2022). "Albanese Government to abolish Administrative Appeals Tribunal". Mark Dreyfus MP. Retrieved 30 October 2024.
  8. 1 2 Revised Explanatory Memorandum, Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth), Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, 2024.
  9. 1 2 "Structure". Administrative Review Tribunal. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  10. Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 (Cth) s 12
  11. "Our Role". Administrative Review Tribunal. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  12. New South Wales v Commonwealth (Inter-state Commission case) [1915] HCA 17 , (1915) 20 CLR 54 (23 March 1915), High Court.
  13. R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia [1956] HCA 10 , (1956) 94 CLR 254(2 March 1956), High Court.