Federal Circuit Court of Australia | |
---|---|
Established | 1999 |
Dissolved | 1 September 2021 |
Jurisdiction | Australia |
Location |
|
Appeals to | |
Appeals from | Certain federal tribunals and other federal bodies, including:
|
Website | www.federalcircuitcourt.gov.au |
Chief Judge | |
Currently | Will Alstergren QC |
Since | 2017 |
The Federal Circuit Court of Australia, formerly known as the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia or the Federal Magistrates Service, was an Australian court with jurisdiction over matters broadly relating to family law and child support, administrative law, admiralty law, bankruptcy, copyright, human rights, industrial law, migration, privacy and trade practices.
The Court was created to deal with the increasing workload of the Federal Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia, by hearing less complex cases for them and freeing those Courts to deal only with more complex cases. The Federal Circuit Court dealt with approximately 95% of migration and bankruptcy applications filed in the federal courts. Approximately 90% of the Court's workload was in the area of family law. The Court also deals with nearly 80% of all family law matters filed in the federal courts. [1] It is also intended to replace (in part) the federal jurisdiction with which state courts have been invested under the Judiciary Act 1903 .
In 2021, the Morrison Government introduced legislation merging the Federal Circuit with the Family Court of Australia to form the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, effective from 1 September 2021. [2]
The court was established on 23 December 1999 by the Australian Government as the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, as a result of royal assent of the Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth). [3] The court is now known as the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Act as the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999. [3] [4] Its first judicial officers were appointed in 2000; it first applications were filed on 23 June 2000 and the Court's first sittings were conducted on 3 July 2000 in Adelaide, Brisbane, Canberra, Melbourne, Newcastle, Parramatta and Townsville.
On 12 April 2013, in recognition of its increased jurisdiction and its role as an intermediate court servicing regional centres as well as capital cities throughout Australia, it was renamed the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and its judicial officers received the title "Judge" instead of "Federal Magistrate". [5]
There are now over 60 judges of the Court. The first Chief Federal Magistrate, Diana Bryant left the court in 2004 when she was appointed Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia, the third person to be appointed that position since the establishment of the Family Court. The current Chief Judge is Will Alstergren, appointed to the role in 2017. The current judges of the Court come from a wide variety of backgrounds, including barristers, solicitors, academic lawyers, as well as legal aid and public service lawyers.
In 2006 the Court was embroiled in controversy when it was revealed that Magistrate Jennifer Rimmer had plagiarised the work of her colleagues when writing decisions. [6]
Bankruptcy, migration and family law comprise the largest components of the Court's work. [7]
There has been a progressive shift over the past 10 years in the balance of workload between the Federal Circuit Court and the Family Court of Australia, with the majority of all family law matters and most divorces now heard in the Federal Circuit Court. This has resulted in the Family Court of Australia becoming a smaller court which manages all appeals and deals with the most lengthy and complex family law cases.
The Federal Circuit Court's family law jurisdiction covers:
The Federal Circuit Court shares jurisdiction with the Federal Court of Australia. The largest volume of the court's general federal law work is in bankruptcy applications and migration. The Federal Circuit Court deals with 95 per cent of all migration applications that are filed in the federal courts. In addition, the Court deals with a significant number of industrial law and human rights matters.
The Federal Circuit Court's general federal law jurisdiction covers the following:
The Court has original jurisdiction under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth). The Court, on remittal from the Federal Court, hears appeals from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
All civil claims and matters under the Bankruptcy Act 1966, except those requiring jury trials. The vast majority of bankruptcy court cases in Australia are heard by The Federal Circuit Court (92% in 2004–5). [7]
The Court has civil jurisdiction with respect to claims under the following provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (formerly known as the Trade Practices Act 1974):
The Court can provide injunctive relief and award damages of up to $750 000. The Court also has civil jurisdiction with respect to claims under the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009. There is provision in certain proceedings for a litigant to elect that an application for compensation be dealt with as a small claims proceeding.
This jurisdiction includes hearing matters relating to (but not limited to) unfair trade practices, product safety and information matters, consumer protection matters, pyramid selling, and importation and manufacture of defective goods.
Federal unlawful discrimination matters under the Australian Human Rights Commissions Act 1986 relating to complaints under the:
The Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Court of Australia to hear and determine complaints of unlawful discrimination based on sex, age, race and disability. Its power to grant relief is wide – it may, for example, grant unlimited damages.
The court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Court for matters under the:
The Court also has jurisdiction in relation to certain matters under the Independent Contractors Act 2006. This jurisdiction is exercised by the Court's Fair Work Division.
Reform in 2005 limited first instance jurisdiction to the Federal Circuit Court and the High Court to review administrative decisions made by the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, the Refugee Review Tribunal and the Migration Review Tribunal. [8] The Court does not have jurisdiction to undertake a merits review of these types of decisions.[ citation needed ]
Enforcing determinations of the Privacy Commissioner and private sector adjudicators under the Privacy Act 1988.
The Court has a Chief Judge (previously known as the Chief Federal Magistrate when the Court was called the Federal Magistrates Court).
Only three people have served as Chief Judge or Chief Federal Magistrate. All three have subsequently (or concurrently) held the office of Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia. They are:
As of October 2020 [update] , the judges of the Court were: [10]
Name | Location | Appointed |
---|---|---|
Rolf Driver | Sydney | 31 July 2000 |
Stewart Brown | Adelaide | 5 November 2001 |
Michael Jarrett | Brisbane | 2 February 2004 |
Sylvia Emmett AM | Sydney | 5 July 2004 |
Grant Riethmuller | Melbourne | 19 July 2004 |
Kevin Lapthorn | Brisbane | 29 August 2005 |
Kate Hughes | Canberra (formerly Melbourne) | 30 January 2006 |
Heather Riley | Melbourne | 3 July 2006 |
Philip Burchardt | Melbourne | 10 July 2006 |
John O'Sullivan | Melbourne | 10 July 2006 |
Antoni Lucev | Perth | 14 August 2006 |
Robert Cameron | Sydney | 3 October 2006 |
Stephen Coates | Brisbane | 24 November 2006 |
Leanne Spelleken | Brisbane | 11 December 2006 |
Charlotte Kelly | Adelaide | 12 March 2007 |
Janet Terry | Newcastle | 10 April 2007 |
Warwick Neville | Canberra | 2 July 2007 |
Dale Kemp | Sydney | 4 July 2007 |
Paul Howard | Brisbane | 9 July 2007 |
Susan Purdon-Sully | Brisbane | 15 October 2007 |
Margaret Cassidy | Brisbane | 5 November 2007 |
Evelyn Bender | Melbourne | 15 September 2008 |
Anne Demack | Brisbane | 22 September 2008 |
Terry McGuire | Hobart/Launceston | 6 October 2008 |
David Dunkley | Parramatta | 13 October 2008 |
Geoffrey Monahan | Sydney | 3 November 2008 |
Peter Cole OAM | Adelaide | 24 November 2008 |
Josephine Willis AM | Cairns | 27 January 2009 |
Leanne Turner | Brisbane | 7 June 2010 |
Joe Harman | Parramatta | 7 June 2010 |
Matthew Myers AM | Parramatta | 23 January 2012 |
Alexandra Harland | Melbourne (formerly Darwin) | 15 March 2013 |
Nicholas Manousaridis | Sydney | 1 July 2013 |
Joanne Stewart | Melbourne | 2 September 2013 |
Salvatore Vasta | Brisbane | 1 January 2015 |
Sandy Street | Sydney | 1 January 2015 |
Ian Newbrun | Parramatta | 4 February 2015 |
Tony Young | Darwin | 31 July 2015 |
Steven Middleton | Brisbane | 9 November 2015 |
Timothy Heffernan | Adelaide | 23 November 2015 |
Elizabeth Boyle | Sydney | 29 February 2016 |
Alister McNab | Melbourne | 18 May 2016 |
Brana Obradovic | Parramatta | 30 May 2016 |
Amanda Tonkin | Canberra | 1 January 2017 |
Anthony Kelly | Melbourne | 6 February 2017 |
Patrizia Mercuri | Melbourne | 18 September 2017 |
Jane Costigan | Newcastle | 9 October 2017 |
Will Alstergren (Chief Judge) | Melbourne | 13 October 2017 |
Gregory Egan | Brisbane | 18 December 2017 |
Christopher Kendall | Perth | 29 January 2018 |
Caroline Kirton | Melbourne | 29 January 2018 |
Julia Baird | Sydney | 20 February 2018 |
Terry Betts | Newcastle | 30 May 2018 |
Bruce Smith | Sydney | 12 June 2018 |
Karl Blake | Melbourne | 30 January 2019 |
Douglas Humphreys OAM | Parramatta | 11 March 2019 |
Monica Neville | Sydney | 11 March 2019 |
Alice Carter | Melbourne | 14 March 2019 |
Anna Boymal | Melbourne | 18 March 2019 |
Dillon Morley | Sydney | 19 March 2019 |
Penelop Kari | Adelaide | 25 March 2019 |
Patrick O'Shannessy | Melbourne | 18 September 2020 |
Kylie Beckhouse | Sydney | 10 December 2020 |
Christopher Bowrey | Townsville | 22 March 2021 |
Colin Campbell | Sydney | 6 April 2021 |
Jonathan Davis | Melbourne | 6 April 2021 |
Jennifer Howe | Melbourne | 6 April 2021 |
Former judges include folk singer turned lawyer and judge, Judy Small, who served on the Court between 2014 and 2020, [11] and Barbara Baker, now Governor of Tasmania, who served on the Court from 2008 to 2021. [12]
Federal Circuit Court judges are assisted by Associates and Deputy Associates, many of whom are qualified lawyers.
The Court sits permanently in each state capital, although in Perth it only hears general federal law matters as the Family Court of Western Australia has sole jurisdiction over family law in that state. The Court also sits permanently in the major regional centres of Launceston, Cairns, Townsville, Parramatta and Newcastle and regularly circuits to a large number of regional cities to hear family law cases. The Court hears some applications and evidence by telephone or video evidence when parties or witnesses live a long way from the Court.
In keeping with the Court's requirement to act as informally as possible, section 3 of the Federal Circuit Court Act, barristers are not required to robe for interim or interlocutory applications and wigs are not worn for any occasion. Barristers are only required to robe for final hearings before the Federal Circuit Court for all judgments, trials and contested hearings in which oral evidence is to be adduce practice direction number 1 of 2010
The Family Court of Australia was a superior Australian federal court of record which deals with family law matters, such as divorce applications, parenting disputes, and the division of property when a couple separate. Together with the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, it covered family law matters in all states and territories of Australia except for Western Australia, which has a separate Family Court. Its core function was to determine cases with the most complex law, facts and parties, to cover specialised areas in family law, and to provide national coverage as the national appellate court for family law matters.
The courts of England and Wales, supported administratively by Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service, are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in England and Wales.
The term magistrate is used in a variety of systems of governments and laws to refer to a civilian officer who administers the law. In ancient Rome, a magistratus was one of the highest ranking government officers, and possessed both judicial and executive powers. In other parts of the world, such as China, a magistrate was responsible for administration over a particular geographic area. Today, in some jurisdictions, a magistrate is a judicial officer who hears cases in a lower court, and typically deals with more minor or preliminary matters. In other jurisdictions, magistrates are typically trained volunteers appointed to deal with criminal and civil matters in their local areas.
The federal judiciary of the United States is one of the three branches of the federal government of the United States organized under the United States Constitution and laws of the federal government. Article III of the Constitution requires the establishment of a Supreme Court and permits the Congress to create other federal courts and place limitations on their jurisdiction. Article III states that federal judges are appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate to serve until they resign, are impeached and convicted, or die.
The judiciary of Australia comprises judges who sit in federal courts and courts of the States and Territories of Australia. The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the Australian court hierarchy as the ultimate court of appeal on matters of both federal and State law.
The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory is the highest court of the Australian Capital Territory. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the territory in civil matters and hears the most serious criminal matters.
The Local Court of New South Wales is the lowest court in the judicial hierarchy of the Australian state of New South Wales. Formerly known as the Court of Petty Sessions and the Magistrates Court, there are more than 160 branches across New South Wales where the Local Court has jurisdiction to deal with the majority of minor civil and criminal matters.
Australian administrative law defines the extent of the powers and responsibilities held by administrative agencies of Australian governments. It is basically a common law system, with an increasing statutory overlay that has shifted its focus toward codified judicial review and to tribunals with extensive jurisdiction.
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) is an Australian tribunal that conducts independent merits review of administrative decisions made under Commonwealth laws of the Australian Government. The AAT review decisions made by Australian Government ministers, departments and agencies, and in limited circumstances, decisions made by state government and non-government bodies. They also review decisions made under Norfolk Island laws. It is not a court and not part of the Australian court hierarchy; however, its decisions are subject to review by the Federal Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The AAT was established by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 and started operation in 1976.
The High Court of New Zealand is the superior court of New Zealand. It has general jurisdiction and responsibility, under the Senior Courts Act 2016, as well as the High Court Rules 2016, for the administration of justice throughout New Zealand. There are 18 High Court locations throughout New Zealand, plus one stand-alone registry.
The Supreme Court of Norfolk Island is the superior court for the Australian territory of Norfolk Island. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the territory in civil matters and hears the most serious criminal matters. It also has jurisdiction over the Coral Sea Islands Territory. All matters are heard before a single judge, including appeals from the Court of Petty Sessions. In the Australian court hierarchy, it is one of eight state and territory Supreme Courts having unlimited jurisdiction in their respective parts of Australia. Appeal lies to the Federal Court of Australia, from which an appeal by special leave can be made to the High Court of Australia.
Northern Pipeline Construction Company v. Marathon Pipe Line Company, 458 U.S. 50 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Article III jurisdiction could not be conferred on non-Article III courts.
The Federal Court of Australia is an Australian superior court of record which has jurisdiction to deal with most civil disputes governed by federal law, along with some summary and indictable criminal matters. Cases are heard at first instance by single judges. The court includes an appeal division referred to as the Full Court comprising three judges, the only avenue of appeal from which lies to the High Court of Australia. In the Australian court hierarchy, the Federal Court occupies a position equivalent to the supreme courts of each of the states and territories. In relation to the other courts in the federal stream, it is equal to the Family Court of Australia, and superior to the Federal Circuit Court. It was established in 1976 by the Federal Court of Australia Act.
The Family Court of Western Australia is a state court that deals with family law. It was established by the passing of the Family Court Act and commenced operation in 1976. It is a state family curt under section 41 of the Commonwealth Family Law Act 1975, and deals with the same issues as the Commonwealth Family Court, including divorce, marital property settlements, and child custody, and also adoption and surrogacy. Although funded by the Commonwealth Government, it is the only state-based family court in Australia. The reason for the creation of the court as a state court was to bestow additional jurisdiction related to family law on the court, which were beyond the scope of federal power, such as de facto arrangements and adoptions.
The Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory is a court of summary jurisdiction that deals with the majority of criminal law matters and the majority of small civil law matters in the Australian Capital Territory, the Jervis Bay Territory and the Australian Antarctic Territory.
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS, is a landmark Australian judgment of the High Court. The matter related to immigration law, jurisdictional error and illogicality as a ground of judicial review.
The Commonwealth Industrial Court, known as the Australian Industrial Court from 1973, was a specialist court to deal with industrial matters, principally the enforcement of awards and orders of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission. Over time it took on more matters and its judges were allocated a wide range of judicial tasks until it was replaced in 1977 by the Federal Court of Australia which had a more general jurisdiction covering matters arising under Australian federal law.
The rules of civil procedure in Australia govern procedure in the various courts and tribunals in Australia. Civil procedure in Australia was historically derived from, and continues to resemble, civil procedure in England and Wales. The rules vary between the different courts and tribunals.
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is an Australian Court formed in September 2021 from the merger of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia. It has jurisdiction over family law matters, such as divorce applications, parenting disputes, and the division of property when a couple separate. It also has jurisdiction over matters broadly relating to family law and child support, administrative law, admiralty law, bankruptcy, copyright, human rights, industrial law, migration, privacy and trade practices.
Michael Jarrett is a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. He was previously a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia until its merger with the Family Court of Australia. Before then, he was a Federal Magistrate of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, before it was named the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. Jarrett has presided over a variety of cases, including family law, administrative law, bankruptcy, copyright, human rights, industrial law, and trade practices. Prior to being a judge, Jarrett was a barrister.