Family Court of Australia

Last updated

Family Court of Australia
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Melbourne Federal Court.JPG
The Family Court of Australia, Melbourne is housed in the Commonwealth Law Courts Building on the corner of La Trobe and William Streets
Established1976
Dissolved1 September 2021
JurisdictionAustralia
Authorized by Australian Constitution
Appeals to High Court of Australia (on special leave)
Website familycourt.gov.au
Chief Justice
Currently Will Alstergren
Since10 December 2018
Deputy Chief Justice
Currently Robert McClelland
Since10 December 2018

The Family Court of Australia was a superior Australian federal court of record which deals with family law matters, such as divorce applications, parenting disputes, and the division of property when a couple separate. Together with the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, it covered family law matters in all states and territories of Australia except for Western Australia, which has a separate Family Court. Its core function was to determine cases with the most complex law, facts and parties, to cover specialised areas in family law, and to provide national coverage as the national appellate court for family law matters. [1]

Contents

In 2021, the Morrison government introduced legislation merging the Family Court with the Federal Circuit Court of Australia to form the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, effective from 1 September 2021. [2] Since the merger, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is the only court which has jurisdiction to deal with purely family law related issues.

Establishment

The Family Court of Australia was established under Chapter 3 of the Australian Constitution, by the Family Law Act 1975 , [3] and commenced operations on 5 January 1976. It currently comprises a Chief Justice, Deputy Chief Justice, Appeal Division judges and other judges. In July 2008, there were 44 judges (5 of whom were also Judges of the Family Court of Western Australia), 2 judicial registrars and 1 senior registrar. [3] In December 2017 the number of judges was down to 36, including 8 Judges of the Appeals Division. [4] [5] The Court maintains registries in all Australian states and territories except Western Australia. [6]

The Court has had five Chief Justices to date, Elizabeth Evatt AC (1976–1988), Alastair Nicholson AO, RFD, QC (1988–2004), Diana Bryant QC (2004–2017), John Pascoe AC CVO (2017–2018) [7] and Will Alstergren QC , the current Chief Justice who was appointed on 10 December 2018 (having served as Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia since September 2017 and continuing to hold that position). [8] The position of Deputy Chief Justice was previously held by John Faulks until 30 October 2016, [9] but has been filled by former Attorney-General Robert McClelland since 10 December 2018. [8]

The 2008–09 federal budget provided for Family Court expenditure of $137m (including services provided free to the Federal Magistrates' Court). [1]

Jurisdiction

Commonwealth family law is dealt with by the Family Law Act 1975 , the Family Law Regulations 1984 and the Marriage Act 1961 . [10]

In 1986–87, the states agreed that children should be dealt with under the same legislation. The Family Law Act 1975 was amended in 1988 to reflect this agreement (although this did not happen in relation to Queensland until 1990). Western Australia, however, did not enter into the agreement and has maintained its own separate Family Court which deals with federal legislation (such as the Family Law Act) as well as state legislation such as the Family Court Act (WA). [11]

The Court has jurisdiction over all marriage-related cases in all states and territories of Australia, [10] except Western Australia [12] which has its own family court. An avenue of appeal to the Family Court of Australia does however exist in relation to judgments in the Western Australian court.

Its jurisdiction covers applications for declarations of the validity or nullity of marriages, divorces, residence, contact, maintenance, child support and property issues. This jurisdiction, granted under the Family Law Act 1975, is a Commonwealth responsibility under the "matrimonial causes" head of power in Section 51(xxii) of the Australian Constitution. Prior to 1975, jurisdiction over family law matters was held and exercised largely by state Supreme Courts under the Matrimonial Causes Act.

Difference between relationships

The Commonwealth power to legislate for marriage and "matrimonial causes" is supported by sections 51(xxi) and (xxii) of the Constitution, whereas the power to legislate for de facto financial matters largely relies on referrals by States to the Commonwealth in accordance with section 51(xxxvii) of the Australian Constitution. A special cause was created called a "de facto financial cause"; see the Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Bill 2008 [13] explanatory Memorandum. [14]

However, the definitions of "matrimonial cause" and "de facto financial cause" differ in some respects, due to the different sources of Commonwealth power to legislate for these matters. Paragraphs (a) to (d) of the definition of "de facto financial cause", in the Family Law Act 1975 therefore, limit the proceedings within each of those sections to proceedings taken once the relevant de facto relationship has broken down.

Limited jurisdiction over de facto relationships

Hence, from 1 March 2009 a new section in the Family Law Act 1975 has limited jurisdiction over de facto relationships that have a geographical connection with a participating State or Territory, sections 90RG,90SD and 90SK of the Family Law Act. Participating states and territories are: New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, the Northern Territory, Norfolk Island, Christmas Island or the Cocos (Keeling) Islands. The states referred de facto matters under Section 51(xxxvii) of the Australian Constitution.

Children of de facto relationships

The Family Court also has jurisdiction over the children of de facto couples and those that have never lived together. [10] This jurisdiction was acquired by the Commonwealth through a referral of powers agreed between the Commonwealth and all states except Western Australia). The initial referral referred to custody and access in the breakdown of de facto relationships.

Appeals from first-instance decisions

Appeals from first-instance decisions of the Court are to Appeals Division, which includes the Full Court of the Family Court. [15] From the Full Court, the only avenue of appeal is to the High Court of Australia, an action which requires the grant of special leave by the High Court. [16]

Relationship with Federal Circuit Court

With the establishment of the Federal Magistrates' Court in 1999 (now the Federal Circuit Court of Australia), the Family Court has concurrent jurisdiction in most areas, with the FCC. The FMC was initially given jurisdiction to hear applications for nullity and dissolution of marriage, family law property disputes (where the property in dispute was worth less than $0.3m, or property disputes worth more than this if the parties consented), parenting orders providing for matters such as contact, maintenance and specific issues, and where the parties consented, parenting orders providing for the residence of a child. In December 2000, its jurisdiction was extended to encompass "residence". [3] The majority of proceedings under the Family Law Act are now filed in the FMC. [17] In general practice, only the more complex and intractable family law cases are transferred from the Federal Circuit Court to the Family Court. [3]

Proposed changes

In 2008, the federal Attorney-General announced a review [18] of the delivery of family law services by the Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court. A November 2008 report [19] set out a possible framework of governance options to achieve a more integrated system of case management practices across the family law jurisdiction, with changes in judicial structures and reporting relationships. The report concluded that "there exists a significant level of duplication of administrative structures and corporate services across the Family Court and the FMC and that the existing and proposed duplication is not financially sustainable".

According to the report, all review submissions, with the exception of that provided by the Federal Magistrates' Court, "considered that the most effective model for the delivery by the Courts of family law services would be a single family court, with two separate judicial divisions serviced by a single administration." [19] The proposed model is similar to that of the Family Court of Western Australia, which the Law Council of Australia, in its submission, had noted as providing a useful model of the structure and functioning of an integrated Family Court. The Law Council stated that "Chapter III courts exercising largely identical jurisdictions, with separate administrations and competing for funds and resources, is wholly unacceptable and that rationalisation and integration of the two federal courts exercising family law jurisdiction is urgently required." [20]

In her written submission to the Attorney-General, the current Chief Justice, Diana Bryant, noted "the budgetary pressures facing both existing Courts", and that as far as litigants and the public were concerned, there appeared to be significant duplication of resources and functions. She noted that "there are at present two courts with concurrent jurisdiction doing first instance family law work with no legislative differentiation." Her submission favoured combining the current family law functions of the Federal Magistrates Court with the Family Court of Australia under a new Court, with a new name. [21]

Less adversarial trials

In July 2006, under Division 12A of Part VII of the Family Law Act, the Court implemented its model for "less adversarial trials" – to be applied to all new child related proceedings in the Family Court, without the need for consent of the parties. [3] According to the Court, the change from a traditional common law approach to a less adversarial trial "has significant implications, not only for the conduct of family law litigation, but also for the conduct of litigation as a whole." [1]

According to the Family Court, [1] "in a less adversarial trial:

Miscellaneous

When the Family Court was established, an attempt was made to make the court less formal and more "family friendly", with a proposal that wigs should not be worn, although gowns would be retained. In 1987, the requirement to wear wigs were reinstated. Judges and judicial registrars of the Family Court of Australia wore a black silk gown, a bar jacket with either bands or a jabot and a bench wig. Now judges wear a black gown (with a red stripe on appeals and formal sittings).

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magistrate</span> Officer of the state, usually judge

The term magistrate is used in a variety of systems of governments and laws to refer to a civilian officer who administers the law. In ancient Rome, a magistratus was one of the highest ranking government officers, and possessed both judicial and executive powers. In other parts of the world, such as China, magistrate is a word applied to a person responsible for administration over a particular geographic area. Today, in some jurisdictions, a magistrate is a judicial officer who hears cases in a lower court, and typically deals with more minor or preliminary matters. In other jurisdictions, magistrates are typically trained volunteers appointed to deal with criminal and civil matters in their local areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Australia</span> Highest court in Australia

The High Court of Australia is Australia's apex court. It exercises original and appellate jurisdiction on matters specified in the Constitution of Australia and supplementary legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court dress</span> Style of clothes prescribed for courts of law

Court dress comprises the style of clothes and other attire prescribed for members of courts of law. Depending on the country and jurisdiction's traditions, members of the court may wear formal robes, gowns, collars, or wigs. Within a certain country and court setting, there may be many times when the full formal dress is not used. Examples in the UK include many courts and tribunals including the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, and sometimes trials involving children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Malaysia</span> Largely centralized system

Judiciary of Malaysia is largely centralised despite Malaysia's federal constitution, heavily influenced by the English common law, as well as Islamic jurisprudence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District court</span> Category of courts

District courts are a category of courts which exists in several nations, some call them "small case court" usually as the lowest level of the hierarchy. These include:

The judiciary of Australia comprises judges who sit in federal courts and courts of the States and Territories of Australia. The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the Australian court hierarchy as the ultimate court of appeal on matters of both federal and State law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of New South Wales</span> Superior court of New South Wales, Australia

The Supreme Court of New South Wales is the highest state court of the Australian State of New South Wales. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in civil matters, and hears the most serious criminal matters. Whilst the Supreme Court is the highest New South Wales court in the Australian court hierarchy, an appeal by special leave can be made to the High Court of Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory</span> Superior court of the Australian Capital Territory, Australia

The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory is the highest court of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). It has unlimited jurisdiction within the territory in civil matters and hears the most serious criminal matters.

Section 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution of Australia is a provision in the Australian Constitution which empowers the Australian Parliament to legislate on matters referred to it by any state. As Australia is a federation, both states and the Commonwealth have legislative power, and the Australian Constitution limits Commonwealth power. Section 51(xxxvii) allows for a degree of flexibility in the allocation of legislative powers.

Australian family law is principally found in the federal Family Law Act 1975 and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Rules 2021 as well as in other laws and the common law and laws of equity, which affect the family and the relationship between those people, including when those relationships end. Most family law is practised in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia and the Family Court of Western Australia. Australia recognises marriages entered into overseas as well as divorces obtained overseas if they were effected in accordance with the laws of that country. Australian marriage and "matrimonial causes" are recognised by sections 51(xxi) and (xxii) of the Constitution of Australia and internationally by marriage law and conventions, such as the Hague Convention on Marriages (1978).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Court of Australia</span> Australian superior federal court

The Federal Court of Australia is an Australian superior court which has jurisdiction to deal with most civil disputes governed by federal law, along with some summary and indictable criminal matters. Cases are heard at first instance mostly by single judges. In cases of importance, a Full Court comprising three judges can be convened upon determination by the Chief Justice. The Court also has appellate jurisdiction, which is mostly exercised by a Full Court comprising three judges, the only avenue of appeal from which lies to the High Court of Australia. In the Australian court hierarchy, the Federal Court occupies a position equivalent to the supreme courts of each of the states and territories. In relation to the other courts in the federal stream, it is superior to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for all jurisdictions except family law. It was established in 1976 by the Federal Court of Australia Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family Law Act 1975</span>

The Family Law Act 1975(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia. It has 15 parts and is the primary piece of legislation dealing with divorce, parenting arrangements between separated parents (whether married or not), property separation, and financial maintenance involving children or divorced or separated de facto partners: in Australia. It also covers family violence. It came into effect on 5 January 1976, repealing the Matrimonial Causes Act 1961, which had been largely based on fault. On the first day of its enactment, 200 applications for divorce were filed in the Melbourne registry office of the Family Court of Australia, and 80 were filed in Adelaide, while only 32 were filed in Sydney.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Circuit Court of Australia</span> Australian justice court

The Federal Circuit Court of Australia, formerly known as the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia or the Federal Magistrates Service, was an Australian court with jurisdiction over matters broadly relating to family law and child support, administrative law, admiralty law, bankruptcy, copyright, human rights, industrial law, migration, privacy and trade practices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family Court of Western Australia</span>

The Family Court of Western Australia is a state court that deals with family law. It was established by the passing of the Family Court Act and commenced operation in 1976. It is a state family court under section 41 of the Commonwealth Family Law Act 1975, and deals with the same issues as the Commonwealth Family Court, including divorce, marital property settlements, and child custody, and also adoption and surrogacy. Although funded by the Commonwealth Government, it is the only state-based family court in Australia. The reason for the creation of the court as a state court was to bestow additional jurisdiction related to family law on the court, which were beyond the scope of federal power, such as de facto arrangements and adoptions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory</span>

The Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory is a court of summary jurisdiction that deals with the majority of criminal law matters and the majority of small civil law matters in the Australian Capital Territory, the Jervis Bay Territory and the Australian Antarctic Territory.

The Government of Guam (GovGuam) is a presidential representative democratic system, whereby the president is the head of state and the governor is head of government, and of a multi-party system. Guam is an organized, unincorporated territory of the United States with policy relations between Guam and the US under the jurisdiction of the Office of Insular Affairs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Jamaica</span>

The judiciary of Jamaica is based on the judiciary of the United Kingdom. The courts are organized at four levels, with additional provision for appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. The Court of Appeal is the highest appellate court. The Supreme Court has unlimited jurisdiction in all cases, and sits as the Circuit Court to try criminal cases. The Parish Court in each parish hears both criminal and civil cases, excluding grave offences. The Petty Sessions are held under Justices of the Peace, with power to hear minor crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of The Bahamas</span>

The basis of the Bahamian Law and legal system lies within the English Common Law tradition. Justices of the Supreme Court, Registrars and Magistrates are all appointed by The Governor-General acting on the advice of the Judicial and Legal Service Commission, which is composed of five individuals who are headed by the Chief Justice as their chairman. The Chief Justice and the Justices of the Court of Appeal, including the President, are appointed by the Governor-General on the recommendation of the Prime Minister after consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. Once appointed, the salaries and other terms of appointment of the Chief Justice, Justices of Appeal and Justices of the Supreme Court cannot be altered to their disadvantage. Justices of the Supreme Court can serve until the age of 65 years and, where agreed among the judge, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition, may serve until the age of 67. Justices of Appeal can serve until the age of 68 years and, where agreed among the judge, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition, may serve until the age of 70 years. The law of The Bahamas makes provisions for the appointment of 12 Justices to the Bench of the Supreme Court, inclusive of the Chief Justice, and for five Justices of the Court of Appeal, inclusive of the President. The Chief Justice, as Head of the Judiciary, is an ex officio member of the Court of Appeal, but only sits at the invitation of the President.

The Judiciary of Virginia is defined under the Constitution and law of Virginia and is composed of the Supreme Court of Virginia and subordinate courts, including the Court of Appeals, the Circuit Courts, and the General District Courts. Its administration is headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Council, the Committee on District Courts, the Judicial Conferences, the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission, and various other offices and officers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia</span> Australian federal court handling family law matters

The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is an Australian court formed in September 2021 from the merger of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia. It has jurisdiction over family law in Australia, apart from in Western Australia, as well as various other areas of law such as bankruptcy, copyright, human rights, and industrial law.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Budget Statements 2008–09" (PDF). Attorney-General's Department. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  2. ↑ "Media Release - The Courts to receive $100 million in Government funding announced in the 2021-22 Budget". Family Court of Australia. 12 May 2021. Archived from the original on 29 July 2021. Retrieved 29 July 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Annual Report 2007-08" (PDF). Family Court of Australia. 21 October 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  4. ↑ "Judges of the Appeals Division". Family Court of Australia. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  5. ↑ "Judges of the Family Court". Family Court of Australia. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  6. ↑ "Organisational Structure of the Family Court of Australia". Family Court of Australia. Archived from the original on 18 June 2015.
  7. ↑ "Chief Justice". Family Court of Australia. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  8. 1 2 Porter, Christian (27 September 2018). "Appointments of Chief Justice and Deputy Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia". Attorney-General of Australia; Minister for Industrial Relations. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
  9. ↑ "Former judges of the Family Court". Family Court of Australia. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  10. 1 2 3 "Family Law Act 1975" (PDF). Commonwealth of Australia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 May 2011. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  11. ↑ "Legislation". Family Court of WA. Archived from the original on 29 December 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  12. ↑ "About the Family Court of Western Australia". Family Court of Western Australia. 18 January 2009. Archived from the original on 24 December 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  13. ↑ Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Bill 2008 Explanatory memorandum
  14. ↑ http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2008B00184/Explanatory%20Memorandum/Text
  15. ↑ Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 28
  16. ↑ Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 95
  17. ↑ "Family Law jurisdiction of the Federal Magistrates Court". Federal Magistrates Court. Archived from the original on 27 January 2009. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  18. ↑ "A Better Framework for Federal Courts – Consultation". Attorney-General's Department. 20 November 2008. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  19. 1 2 "Report on future governance of federal family courts in Australia November2008" (PDF). Attorney-General's Department. 16 January 2009. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  20. ↑ "Law Council submission to Attorney-General's Department" (PDF). Law Council of Australia. 16 May 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
  21. ↑ "Chief Justice Bryant's submission to Attorney-General's Department" (PDF). Attorney-General's Department. 6 June 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.