IP Australia

Last updated

IP Australia
IP Australia logo.svg
Agency overview
Formed25 February 1998;25 years ago (1998-02-25) [1]
Jurisdiction Australian Government
Employees1,053 (FY21–22) [2]
Minister responsible
Agency executives
  • Michael Schwager, Director-General [4]
  • Paula Adamson, Deputy Director-General [4]
  • Margaret Tregurtha, Deputy Director-General [4]
Website ipaustralia.gov.au
Discovery House, the headquarters of IP Australia in Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Discovery House in Woden.jpg
Discovery House, the headquarters of IP Australia in Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

IP Australia is an Australian Government agency, responsible for administering intellectual property law in Australia. The agency manages the registration of patents, trade marks, registered designs and plant breeder's rights in Australia. The agency sits under the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science. From 1904 until 1998, the responsible government agency was called the Australian Patent Office (APO), which is now a division within IP Australia. The headquarters are located at Discovery House in Canberra, Australia, with offices in some capital cities. IP Australia has been an International Searching Authority (ISA) and International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) for patent applications filed in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty since 31 March 1980. [5] Australia is also a member of the Madrid system for trade marks, the Paris Convention for designs and the UPOV for plant breeder's rights.

Contents

Statutory basis

IP Australia exercises its authority under a number of Commonwealth laws:

Patent examiners

Patent examiners are generally scientists and engineers who do not necessarily hold law degrees but have received legal training in patent law. "A patent examiner is hired based on their technical expertise, their professional qualifications and possibly their industry experience. They then undergo training within the office, and we use competency based training. An examiner will take somewhere between 12 to possibly 18 months to become what is called an acceptance delegate. That means they are assessed to be competent to assess a patent application and make a decision about it qualifying or satisfying all of the legislative provisions." [14] [June 2009].

"If you have not attained the Commissioner of Patents Acceptance Delegation within two years of the date on which you commence duties, you may have failed to meet a condition of your engagement, failed to complete your entry-level training courses and you may lack an essential qualification for the performance of your duties. Consequently, it is likely that immediate action will be taken to terminate your employment." [15] [October 2010]

"APO is pursuing a medium-term strategy of continuing to engage patent examiners so that we can reduce that backlog during a time when our work is a little bit quieter, so that when economic activity picks up again we will be well placed. That is adding to our costs for patent examiners, in particular where we have continued to recruit." [16] [June 2009]

In order to be an ISA, APO must have "at least 100 full-time employees with sufficient technical qualifications to carry out searches." [PCT Reg. 36.1 (i)] [17]

Notable Australian patents

Operational issues

Innovation patents

In 2001, the Australian Patent Office within IP Australia introduced a system that immediately granted "innovation patents" for applications which pass a formalities test. Innovation patents are aimed at providing protection for short market life products. To demonstrate the absurdity of the system, an innovation patent application was filed for the wheel and granted automatically by IP Australia. [33] [35] The applicant, lawyer John Keogh, was awarded an Ig Nobel Prize (a satirical award within the fields of STEM for things that are unusual, imaginative or goofy) for his patent of the wheel. [35]

See also

References and notes

  1. CA 8551: Intellectual Property Australia, Central Office, National Archives of Australia, retrieved 9 December 2013
  2. "IP Australia Annual Report 2022" (PDF). IP Australia. 14 October 2022. p. 75.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. "Organisational chart" (PDF). IP Australia. 1 April 2023. Retrieved 10 April 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. 1 2 3 "Our Senior Executive". IP Australia. Retrieved 10 April 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  5. "Joint Standing Committee On Treaties, 2007-06-22, page TR43, Deputy Director General Beattie" (PDF). Australian Government. Retrieved 22 June 2007.
  6. "Patents Act 1990". Federal Register of Legislation . Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  7. "Patents Regulations 1991". Federal Register of Legislation. Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  8. "Trade Marks Act 1995". Federal Register of Legislation. Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  9. "Trade Marks Regulations 1995". Federal Register of Legislation. Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  10. "Designs Act 2003". Federal Register of Legislation. Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  11. "Designs Regulations 2004". Federal Register of Legislation. Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  12. "Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994". Federal Register of Legislation. Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  13. "Plant Breeder's Rights Regulations 1994". Federal Register of Legislation. Australian Government. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
  14. "Senate Economics Legislation Committee Estimates, 2009-06-01, page E80, Deputy Director General Beattie" (PDF). Australian Government. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  15. "Examiner of Patents Employment Advertisement". IP Australia. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
  16. "Senate Economics Legislation Committee Estimates, 2009-06-01, page E90, Director General Noonan" (PDF). Australian Government. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  17. "Regulations under the PCT, page 80" (PDF). WIPO. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  18. "Refrigeration" (jpe). IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  19. "Sunshine Stripper Harvester" (jpe). IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  20. "Automatic Totalizator" (jpe). IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  21. "Furniture Castors" (jpe). IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  22. "Lawn Mower" (jpe). IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  23. "Rotary Clothes Hoist" (jpe). IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  24. "An Improved Rotary Motor". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  25. "A Prothesis to Simulate Neural Endings". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  26. "Rack and Pinion Steering Gear". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  27. "Yacht Keel With Fins Near Tip". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  28. "Pelletted Poultry Manure Fertilizer". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  29. "Papilloma Virus Vaccine". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  30. "A Wireless LAN". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  31. "In vivo mutations and polymorphisms in the 17q-linked breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene". IP Australia. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  32. "The Gene Patents Case". Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies . Retrieved 13 April 2010.
  33. 1 2 John Michael Keogh (2 August 2001). "Circular transportation facilitation device" (Patent). IP Australia. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  34. "Register of Patents". IP Australia. Retrieved 21 September 2014.
  35. 1 2 Scott, Iain (8 October 2001). "Honouring the IgNobel". ABC News in Science . Australian Broadcasting Corporation . Retrieved 13 April 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Related Research Articles

Australian trade mark law is based on common-law use-based rights as well as the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), which is administered by IP Australia, an Australian government agency within the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Patent and Trademark Office</span> Agency in the United States Department of Commerce

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is an agency in the U.S. Department of Commerce that serves as the national patent office and trademark registration authority for the United States. The USPTO's headquarters are in Alexandria, Virginia, after a 2005 move from the Crystal City area of neighboring Arlington, Virginia.

A patent attorney is an attorney who has the specialized qualifications necessary for representing clients in obtaining patents and acting in all matters and procedures relating to patent law and practice, such as filing patent applications and oppositions to granted patents.

A trademark attorney or trade mark attorney or agent is a person who is qualified to act in matters involving trademark law and practice and provide legal advice on trade mark and design matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intellectual Property Office (United Kingdom)</span> Patent Office of the United Kingdom

The Intellectual Property Office of the United Kingdom is, since 2 April 2007, the operating name of The Patent Office. It is the official government body responsible for intellectual property rights in the UK and is an executive agency of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patent pending</span> As yet ungranted patent application

"Patent pending" or "patent applied for" are legal designations or expressions that can be used in relation to a product or process once a patent application for the product or process has been filed, but prior to the patent being issued or the application abandoned. The marking serves to notify the public, business, or potential infringers who would copy the invention that they may be liable for damages, seizure, and injunction once a patent is issued.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Intellectual Property Office</span> Canadian government agency

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office is responsible for the administration and processing of the greater part of intellectual property (IP) in Canada. CIPO's areas of activity include patents, trademarks, copyright, industrial designs and integrated circuit topographies. Structurally, CIPO functions as a special operating agency (SOA) under Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. CIPO is based in Gatineau, Quebec, part of the National Capital Region. CIPO’s current interim Chief Executive Officer is Konstantinos Georgaras.

Intellectual property rights (IPRs) have been acknowledged and protected in China since the 1980s. China has acceded to the major international conventions on protection of rights to intellectual property. Domestically, protection of intellectual property law has also been established by government legislation, administrative regulations, and decrees in the areas of trademark, copyright, and patent. This has led to the creation of a comprehensive legal framework to protect both local and foreign intellectual property. Despite this, copyright violations are extremely common in the PRC. The American Chamber of Commerce in China surveyed over 500 of its members doing business in China regarding IPR for its 2016 China Business Climate Survey Report, and found that IPR enforcement is improving, but significant challenges still remain. The results show that the laws in place exceed their actual enforcement, with patent protection receiving the highest approval rate, while protection of trade secrets lags far behind. Many US companies have claimed that the Chinese government has stolen their intellectual property sometime in 2009–2019.

Patent prosecution describes the interaction between applicants and their representatives, and a patent office with regard to a patent, or an application for a patent. Broadly, patent prosecution can be split into pre-grant prosecution, which involves arguing before, and sometimes negotiation with, a patent office for the grant of a patent, and post-grant prosecution, which involves issues such as post-grant amendment and opposition.

Japanese patent law is based on the first-to-file principle and is mainly given force by the Patent Act of Japan. Article 2 defines an invention as "the highly advanced creation of technical ideas utilizing the law of nature".

The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks(CGPDTM) generally known as the Indian Patent Office, is an agency under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade which administers the Indian law of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks.

Evergreening is any of various legal, business, and technological strategies by which producers extend the lifetime of their patents that are about to expire in order to retain revenues from them. Often the practice includes taking out new patents, or by buying out or frustrating competitors, for longer periods of time than would normally be permissible under the law. Robin Feldman, a law professor at UC Law SF and a leading researcher in intellectual property and patents, defines evergreening as "artificially extending the life of a patent or other exclusivity by obtaining additional protections to extend the monopoly period."

A tax patent is a patent that discloses and claims a system or method for reducing or deferring taxes. Tax patents have been granted predominantly in the United States but can be granted in other countries as well. They are considered to be a form of business method patent. They are also called "tax planning patents", "tax strategy patents", and "tax shelter patents". In September 2011, President Barack Obama signed legislation passed by the U.S. Congress that effectively prohibits the granting of tax patents in general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property</span> Facility in Bern, Switzerland

The Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IPI), based in Bern, is an agency of the federal administration of Switzerland responsible for patents, trademarks, geographical indications, industrial designs and copyright.

Australian patent law is law governing the granting of a temporary monopoly on the use of an invention, in exchange for the publication and free use of the invention after a certain time. The primary piece of legislation is the Patents Act 1990. Patents are administered by the Commonwealth Government agency IP Australia. Australia is a member state of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and compliant with Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). This makes Australian patent law broadly comparable with patent law in other major countries.

Iran is a member of the WIPO since 2001 and has acceded to several WIPO intellectual property treaties. Iran joined the Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property in 1959. In December 2003 Iran became a party to the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Marks. In 2005 Iran joined the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, which ensures the protection of geographical names associated with products. As at February 2008 Iran had yet to accede to The Hague Agreement for the Protection of Industrial Designs.

On 29 March 2010, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York found several of the patent claims on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer genes held by Myriad Genetics to be invalid. The patents were initially issued on the basis that the genes were isolated and purified to a non-naturally occurring state, however the court found, amongst other things, that the purification was not markedly different from a product of nature and thus was not patentable. The ruling may have implications for holders of other gene patents and the patentability of other naturally occurring substances. It has the potential to directly affect the operation of the healthcare and medical research industries, particularly with regards to cancer treatment and prevention, and may alter the accessibility of such therapies to patients.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leahy–Smith America Invents Act</span>

The Leahy–Smith America Invents Act (AIA) is a United States federal statute that was passed by Congress and was signed into law by President Barack Obama on September 16, 2011. The law represents the most significant legislative change to the U.S. patent system since the Patent Act of 1952 and closely resembles previously proposed legislation in the Senate in its previous session.

A biological patent is a patent on an invention in the field of biology that by law allows the patent holder to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the protected invention for a limited period of time. The scope and reach of biological patents vary among jurisdictions, and may include biological technology and products, genetically modified organisms and genetic material. The applicability of patents to substances and processes wholly or partially natural in origin is a subject of debate.

DABUS is an artificial intelligence (AI) system created by Stephen Thaler. It reportedly conceived two inventions. The filing of patent applications designating DABUS as inventor has led to decisions by patent offices and courts on whether a patent can be granted for an invention reportedly made by an AI system.