African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms

Last updated

The African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms (AfDec) [1] has been created in order to promote an Internet environment that conforms to established human rights standards and meets Africa's social and economic development needs. The Declaration was agreed on at the 2013 African Internet Governance Forum (AfIGF) in Nairobi, Kenya and launched in 2014 at the global Internet Governance Forum in Istanbul, Turkey. [2] It provides a normative framework on which basis recommendations for policy and legislative processes on internet rights, freedoms and governance in Africa are made. They can be applied at national, sub-regional and regional levels.

Contents

Background

The AfDec has been developed in response to the increasing access of Africans to the internet. With millions of people engaging online on issues such as political, social, economic and governance matters, many African countries try to control the internet in some kind of way. For example, in 2022, the number of internet users in Africa rose to 565 million, which is six times more than the number of users in 2010. [3] However, many African countries adopted problematic regulations from other countries, which often fail to protect human rights but rather violate them. As an example, China is trying to export its Internet technology to Africa, which is based on an authoritarian cyberspace governance model, in attempt to extend their influence as a 'cyberspace superpower'. [4] As a result, many African countries transformed from low to highly regulated internet environments, not only preventing crime but also restricting critical voices such as criticism of governments. Hence, the AfDec tries "to elaborate on the principles which are necessary to uphold human and people’s rights on the Internet, and to cultivate an Internet environment that can best meet Africa’s social and economic development needs and goals". [2] The AfDec emerged from different issues and trends in Internet regulation and Internet rights that are described in a background paper. [5]

Drafting and design

The African Declaration of Internet Rights and Freedom is built on well-established African human rights documents including the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (1981), the Windhoek Declaration on Promoting an Independent and Pluralistic African Press (1991), the African Charter on Broadcasting (2001), the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa (2002) and the African Platform on Access to Information Declaration (2011). The AfDec was envisioned at the 2013 African Internet Governance Forum meeting in Nairobi, Kenya. Subsequently, the drafting process began at a following meeting in 2014. The drafters’ group was led by Edetaen Ojo (executive director of Media Rights Agenda) and developed the contents, purpose and text for the Declaration. They received feedback from an online public consultation and African and international stakeholders. [6]

At the beginning of the drafting process, it became clear that there already have been successful regional projects in the past which defined regional standards for Internet freedom. Those initiatives had an enormous impact in building movements and raising awareness on the highest political levels. The following challenge was to bring these ideas, improvements and goals together into one document for which a meeting in February 2014 was scheduled. This meeting was used to start and build a shared civil society campaign and develop purposes and strategies for the design of an African Declaration of Internet Rights and Freedom.

The drafting started with evaluating the existing principles and Charters, figuring out their main goals and analyzing their strengths and weaknesses. The participants were then divided into groups based on their regional origin and determined their top priorities for a Declaration. “Based on the priorities identified above, participants broke into issue-based groups. Each group picked a priority issue from the lists developed and explored the challenges associated with that right which could be addressed in a Declaration; existing standards in relation to that issue; and what demands should be included in any Declaration with regards to that issue.” Consequently, a list of possible allies was developed, which should be used to gain support and expand the reach of the Declaration. This list included African networks, intergovernmental organizations, funders and donors as well as international supporters. [7]

At the end of this drafting meeting in February 2014 the title of the Declaration was agreed on and a work schedule for the following 7–12 months was designed. The final draft was available for the public by spring and the launch of the then revised AfDec took place in September 2014. The goal was set to promote the Declaration further, especially “in different institutions involved in the dispersed internet governance field, including the African Union and UNESCO”. [8]

Content

The African Declaration of Internet Rights and Freedoms declares 13 key principles regarding Human Rights on the Internet. The declaration applies to all governments, “regional and sub-regional bodies, national governments, civil society organisations, media institutions and relevant Internet companies”. [1] It states that national governments must take measures to “respect, protect and guarantee the rights outlined in this declaration”. [1] These include providing legal frameworks and effective remedies against violations as well as ensuring transparent, well-resourced, independent regulators on the Internet. In practice, the declaration announces that states should implement actions or intensify them and adopt best practices from other African states.

Key principles

The key principles include:

  1. An open infrastructure on the Internet, which allows for the distribution of ideas and a public discourse without discrimination. The restriction of Internet access or speed shall not be permitted.
  2. Access to the Internet for all people in Africa without discrimination based on “race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status [1] ”
  3. Freedom of expression. Any restrictions must be “provided by law, pursue a legitimate aim as expressly listed under international human rights law (namely the rights or reputations of others, the protection of national security, or of public order, public health or morals) and are necessary and proportionate in pursuance of a legitimate aim”. [1] With reference to the Manila Principle of Intermediary Liability it holds that only the author themselves can be held liable for the content and not the platform on which it is published.
  4. The right to information. Those information that are produced on public funds have to be made accessible to the people according to minimum standards.
  5. The freedom to use the Internet for assembly and association. Any restrictions must be “provided by law, pursue a legitimate aim as expressly listed under international human rights law (namely the rights or reputations of others, the protection of national security, or of public order, public health or morals) and are necessary and proportionate in pursuance of a legitimate aim”. [1]
  6. The right to freely choose any language when sharing information on the Internet.
  7. The opportunity to use the Internet to make use of one's right to sustainable development.
  8. The right to privacy and data protection, specifically the right to anonymity. Any restrictions must be “provided by law, pursue a legitimate aim as expressly listed under international human rights law (namely the rights or reputations of others, the protection of national security, or of public order, public health or morals) and are necessary and proportionate in pursuance of a legitimate aim”. [1]
  9. The aim of a trustworthy, stable Internet that is based on cooperation of its stakeholders. Any unlawful surveillance shall not be permitted.
  10. The rejection of discrimination and of violations of human rights. States are required to provide a safe environment for free speech. This includes the environment on the Internet and laws for protecting those who engage in public discourse such as journalists and women's and human rights defenders.
  11. The right to a fair process for every individual concerning legal claims with regards to the use of the Internet. States must provide equal protection under the law and arbitrary detention or punishment thus shall not be allowed.
  12. The right for everyone to participate in an open governance of the Internet. The declaration may not be used to justify the prevention of equality.
  13. The recognition of existing gender inequalities in knowledge about and accessing the Internet. This recognition is the premise to be able to tackle them and achieve equal access.

Reactions and supporters

Since the establishment of the Declaration of Internet Rights and Freedoms the group has been active on social media under the Twitter account @AfricaNetRights, promoting their publications from the website updates as well as projects from similar organizations and projects concerning the Internet freedom of Africa. As of mid-June 2022, the declaration has been endorsed by 45 African countries, 9 non-African countries, 151 organizations, and 186 Individuals (totalling 369 supporters).

List of coalition members

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights</span> Fundamental rights belonging to all humans

Human rights are moral principles or norms for certain standards of human behaviour and are regularly protected in municipal and international law. They are commonly understood as inalienable, fundamental rights "to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being" and which are "inherent in all human beings", regardless of their age, ethnic origin, location, language, religion, ethnicity, or any other status. They are applicable everywhere and at every time in the sense of being universal, and they are egalitarian in the sense of being the same for everyone. They are regarded as requiring empathy and the rule of law and imposing an obligation on persons to respect the human rights of others, and it is generally considered that they should not be taken away except as a result of due process based on specific circumstances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Universal Declaration of Human Rights</span> Declaration adopted in 1948 by the United Nations General Assembly

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is an international document adopted by the United Nations General Assembly that enshrines the rights and freedoms of all human beings. Drafted by a UN committee chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt, it was accepted by the General Assembly as Resolution 217 during its third session on 10 December 1948 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris, France. Of the 58 members of the United Nations at the time, 48 voted in favour, none against, eight abstained, and two did not vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Summit on the Information Society</span>

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was a two-phase United Nations-sponsored summit on information, communication and, in broad terms, the information society that took place in 2003 in Geneva and in 2005 in Tunis. WSIS Forums have taken place periodically since then. One of the Summit's chief aims is to bridge the global digital divide separating rich countries from poor countries by increasing internet accessibility in the developing world. The conferences established 17 May as World Information Society Day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of information</span> Freedom of a person or people to publish and consume information

Freedom of information is freedom of a person or people to publish and consume information. Access to information is the ability for an individual to seek, receive and impart information effectively. This sometimes includes "scientific, indigenous, and traditional knowledge; freedom of information, building of open knowledge resources, including open Internet and open standards, and open access and availability of data; preservation of digital heritage; respect for cultural and linguistic diversity, such as fostering access to local content in accessible languages; quality education for all, including lifelong and e-learning; diffusion of new media and information literacy and skills, and social inclusion online, including addressing inequalities based on skills, education, gender, age, race, ethnicity, and accessibility by those with disabilities; and the development of connectivity and affordable ICTs, including mobile, the Internet, and broadband infrastructures".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Commission of Jurists</span> Non-governmental human rights organization based in Geneva, Switzerland

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) is an international human rights non-governmental organization. It is a standing group of 60 eminent jurists—including senior judges, attorneys and academics—who work to develop national and international human rights standards through the law. Commissioners are known for their experience, knowledge and fundamental commitment to human rights. The composition of the Commission aims to reflect the geographical diversity of the world and its many legal systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital rights</span> Type of human and legal rights

Digital rights are those human rights and legal rights that allow individuals to access, use, create, and publish digital media or to access and use computers, other electronic devices, and telecommunications networks. The concept is particularly related to the protection and realization of existing rights, such as the right to privacy and freedom of expression, in the context of digital technologies, especially the Internet. The laws of several countries recognize a right to Internet access.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet governance</span> System of laws, norms, rules, policies and practices

Internet governance consists of a system of laws, rules, policies and practices that dictate how its board members manage and oversee the affairs of any internet related-regulatory body. This article describes how the Internet was and is currently governed, some inherent controversies, and ongoing debates regarding how and why the Internet should or should not be governed in future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Governance Forum</span>

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a multistakeholder governance group for policy dialogue on issues of Internet governance. It brings together all stakeholders in the Internet governance debate, whether they represent governments, the private sector or civil society, including the technical and academic community, on an equal basis and through an open and inclusive process. The establishment of the IGF was formally announced by the United Nations Secretary-General in July 2006. It was first convened in October–November 2006 and has held an annual meeting since then.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WOUGNET</span> Non-governmental organization in Uganda

Women of Uganda Network (WOUGNET) also known as Women of Uganda Network Development Limited is Ugandan non-governmental organization that aids women and women's organisations in the use and access of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to share information and address issues their concerns such as gender norms, advocating for their rights and building communities and businesses through education.

Source protection, sometimes also referred to as source confidentiality or in the U.S. as the reporter's privilege, is a right accorded to journalists under the laws of many countries, as well as under international law. It prohibits authorities, including the courts, from compelling a journalist to reveal the identity of an anonymous source for a story. The right is based on a recognition that without a strong guarantee of anonymity, many would be deterred from coming forward and sharing information of public interests with journalists.

The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, otherwise known as the European Convention on Bioethics or the European Bioethics Convention, is an international instrument aiming to prohibit the misuse of innovations in biomedicine and to protect human dignity. The Convention was opened for signature on 4 April 1997 in Oviedo, Spain and is thus otherwise known as the Oviedo Convention. The International treaty is a manifestation of the effort on the part of the Council of Europe to keep pace with developments in the field of biomedicine; it is notably the first multilateral binding instrument entirely devoted to biolaw. The Convention entered into force on 1 December 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of speech</span> Right to communicate ones opinions and ideas

Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The right to freedom of expression has been recognised as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights law by the United Nations. Many countries have constitutional law that protects free speech. Terms like free speech, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression are used interchangeably in political discourse. However, in a legal sense, the freedom of expression includes any activity of seeking, receiving, and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.

The general principles of European Union law are general principles of law which are applied by the European Court of Justice and the national courts of the member states when determining the lawfulness of legislative and administrative measures within the European Union. General principles of European Union law may be derived from common legal principles in the various EU member states, or general principles found in international law or European Union law. General principles of law should be distinguished from rules of law as principles are more general and open-ended in the sense that they need to be honed to be applied to specific cases with correct results.

The Declaration of Principles on Equality reflects a moral and professional consensus among human rights and equality experts done in December 2008. It contains 27 principles that establish a new paradigm on equality, drawing on established and emerging principles of international law. It has been described by the High Court of Delhi as reflecting the ‘current international understanding of Principles on Equality.’

The International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance is a document which attempts to "clarify how international human rights law applies in the current digital environment". Communications surveillance conflicts with a number of international human rights, mainly that of privacy. As a result, communications surveillance may only occur when prescribed by law necessary to achieve legitimate aim, and proportionate to the aim used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Access to public information in Europe</span> Public access to information maintained by government agencies in Europe

Access to public information and freedom of information (FOI) refer to the right to access information held by public bodies also known as "right to know". Access to public information is considered of fundamental importance for the effective functioning of democratic systems, as it enhances governments' and public officials' accountability, boosting people's participation and allowing their informed participation into public life. The fundamental premise of the right to access public information is that the information held by governmental institutions is in principle public and may be concealed only on the basis of legitimate reasons which should be detailed in the law. Access to public information builds on the principle that in a democratic system people should be in the condition of accessing a wide range of information in order to effectively participate in public life as well as on matters affecting them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights and encryption</span> Use of encryption technology to ensure human rights are maintained

Human rights applied to encryption are a concept of freedom of expression, where encryption is a technical resource in the implementation of basic human rights.

Multistakeholder participation is a specific governance approach whereby relevant stakeholders participate in the collective shaping of evolutions and uses of the Internet.

The African Internet Governance Forum (AfIGF) is a multistakeholder forum that facilitates dialogue on Internet governance issues. It is one of the 19 regional IGF initiatives and aims to address and discuss the issues of all 54 nations in Africa.

Digital constitutionalism is a concept used in the context of research investigating the impact of digital technology on constitutional values and principles. As for the notion of constitutionalism, this concept has not received a univocal definition, having been referred to a movement, a set of instruments and an ideology. The notion of digital constitutionalism emerged in the context of the digital revolution that characterised the first decades of the Twenty First century. Current research is conducted by scholars from various disciplines, including law, communication studies, philosophy and political science. It focuses on the instruments and actors involved in promoting constitutional values and principles which are fit for the digital age.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "African Declaration of Internet Rights and Freedoms". African Internet Rights. 22 June 2022.
  2. 1 2 "African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms launches at IGF, Highway Africa". IFEX. 2014-09-04. Retrieved 2022-06-23.
  3. ↑ "Africa: internet penetration 2021". Statista. Retrieved 2022-06-23.
  4. ↑ Gravett, Willem (2020). "Digital neo-colonialism: The Chinese model of internet sovereignty in Africa". African Human Rights Law Journal. 20 (1): 125–146. doi: 10.17159/1996-2096/2020/v20n1a5 . ISSN   1996-2096.
  5. ↑ Mazango, Eric (2014). "African Declaration on Internet Freedom/Rights APC Background Paper" (PDF).
  6. ↑ "About the initiative | African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms". africaninternetrights.org. Retrieved 2022-06-24.
  7. ↑ "Meeting Report. Regional Meeting towards an African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms" (PDF). 2014.
  8. ↑ "No. 91 Launch of an African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms" (PDF). 2014.
  9. ↑ "Evaluation du respect des droits et libertés de l'internet en Afrique : Cas du Burundi, du Cameroun, du Congo, de la Côte d'Ivoire, du Sénégal et du Tchad – PROTEGE QV" (in French). Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  10. ↑ "About the initiative | African Declaration on Internet Rights and Freedoms". africaninternetrights.org. Retrieved 2022-06-21.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.