Americans United for Life

Last updated

Americans United for Life
AbbreviationAUL
Formation1971
Type Nonprofit
PurposeTo advance the human right to life in culture, law, and policy. [1]
HeadquartersWashington, DC
Region served
United States
Interim President
Kevin Tordoff [2]
Budget
$2.7 million
Website Americans United for Life

Americans United for Life (AUL) is an American anti-abortion law firm and advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1971, the group opposes abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, embryonic stem cell research, and certain contraceptive methods. [3] [4] The organization has led campaigns and been involved in judicial actions to prevent the passage and implementation of legislation that permits abortion, or may increase prevalence of abortion, including successfully defending the Hyde Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Contents

The group has been influential in the spread of so-called "Heartbeat" legislation across a number of American states. [5]

Early history and mission

AUL was founded in Washington, D.C. in 1971, two years prior to the nationwide legalization of abortion following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade . [6] The organization's first chairman of the board was Unitarian minister and then-Hollis Professor of Divinity at Harvard Divinity School, George Huntston Williams. [6] Initially the group was involved in the intellectual debate surrounding abortion, but in 1975 the founders reorganized it into a legal organization. One of the group's early areas of focus was on building a case to persuade the Supreme Court to overturn its 1973 ruling. In 1987 the group outlined their plan to overturn Roe v. Wade in a book titled Abortion and the Constitution: Reversing Roe v. Wade Through the Courts. [7] AUL was inspired by efforts of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in its strategy to impact legislation. [8] The organization is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit, educational organization and public-interest law firm, with a specific interest in anti-abortion legislation. AUL's areas of legal interest include abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, stem cell research, and human cloning. [9]

During the first half of the 1970s, Eugene Diamond of AUL argued that abortion was dangerous to women's health. [10] Charles Rice, a professor at Fordham Law School, who was active in the AUL argued that "birth control fever" had infected American society. [10] Early on, the organization did not oppose all forms of abortion. [10] Some within the organization also supported a legal right to contraceptives. [10] When the organization did not decide to condemn all forms of abortion, a number of member left and formed the United States Coalition for Life (USCL). [10]

Lobbying and litigation

AUL has supported bills to reduce the prevalence of abortion in the United States, including the Pregnant Women Support Act by United States Representative Lincoln Davis, which was introduced in 2006. [11] In 1980, AUL played a key role in the Harris v. McRae decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld the Hyde Amendment restricting federal funding of Medicaid abortions only to cases of life endangerment (and, since 1994, rape or incest) and determined that states participating in Medicaid were not required to fund medically necessary abortions for which federal reimbursement was unavailable as a result of the Hyde Amendment. Professor Victor Rosenblum, a board member of AUL, argued the case before the Supreme Court [12] and the AUL Legal Defense Fund represented the amendment's chief sponsor Rep. Henry Hyde and others. [13]

The group has also been involved in legislative and judicial actions to prevent late-term abortions. Between 1997 and 2000, AUL worked with state attorneys general across the U.S. on partial birth abortion legislation. [6] The group supported the passage of legislation in Virginia, banning a late-term abortion procedure. [7] In 2006, the organization supported legislation that was proposed in 21 states, which aimed to require that doctors who perform late-term abortions inform their patients that the fetus might feel pain during the procedure. AUL vice president Daniel McConchie stated that the aim of the proposals was "humanizing the unborn". [14] In 2007, the organization was involved in a Supreme Court case in which it helped to uphold the 2003 federal ban on partial-birth abortions. [15]

Model legislation

AUL writes model legislation every year and makes it available on the web for state legislators and others involved in the policy process. The model legislation is also included in the organization's annual guidebook, Defending Life, which is provided to state legislators. [16] The organization developed model legislation for state laws requiring that either a parent or doctor be informed before a minor's pregnancy is terminated. [7] [9] In addition, the organization developed language for state laws requiring doctors to advise patients about the health risks from abortions. [7] AUL has also drafted model legislation for states to ban assisted suicide, human cloning and specific kinds of stem cell research, [7] and an opt-out provision for states objecting to the "abortion mandate" in the 2009 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. [17]

In 2008, AUL produced the Pregnant Woman's Protection Act, a piece of model legislation aimed at providing greater rights to pregnant women to defend themselves from physical attack, especially in regard to domestic violence. [18] In 2011, Mother Jones , a politically liberal magazine, published a report on Nebraska's Legislative Bill 232, a bill based on the Pregnant Women's Protection Act, that was critical of both the bill's wording and AUL's campaign to introduce the legislation. The report claimed that the bill's wording strongly advocates 'justifiable force', including homicide, against anyone that would be performing or seeking to perform legal abortion services. [19] Mother Jones was also critical of similar bills, also based in part on the AUL model legislation for the Pregnant Woman's Protection Act, that were introduced in South Dakota [20] and Iowa. [21]

Other issues

Abortion in cases of rape

On July 14, 2022, Catherine Glenn Foster, the organization's president, stated during U.S. House Judiciary Committee testimony: "If a 10-year-old became pregnant as the result of rape and it was threatening her life, that’s not an abortion," [22] apparently referring to the case of a 27 year-old Ohio man charged with raping a 10-year-old girl who then traveled to Indiana to obtain an abortion after the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade. [23] Sarah Warbelow, legal director for the Human Rights Campaign, responded that Foster's remarks were "very significant disinformation," and further added, “An abortion is a procedure. It’s a medical procedure that individuals undergo for a wide range of circumstances, including because if they have been sexually assaulted, or raped in the case of the 10 year old." [24]

Opposition to RU-486, Ella and gender testing

AUL has argued against the use of certain drugs including contraceptives that can be used to induce abortion, and also early-pregnancy gender detection tests. In 1995 the group filed a petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that demanded the agency apply the strictest possible standards when reviewing a drug used to induce abortions, RU-486. [25] Later, in 2009 and 2010, the organization opposed the FDA approval of the contraceptive drug Ulipristal acetate (also known under the brand name ella). It argued that the pill caused abortions and campaigned for the FDA to not approve the drug for use in the U.S. [26] The group has also voiced opposition towards an early-pregnancy gender detection kit called the Baby Gender Mentor. It stated that learning the gender at such an early point may lead some parents to terminate the pregnancy if they were hoping for a baby of the opposite sex to that indicated by the test. AUL claims that some women disappointed by the result of their test would find it easier to have an abortion if they get the results early. [27]

Obamacare

AUL opposes the contraceptive mandate in Obamacare. [28] [29] [30] During the 2009 debate over President Barack Obama's health care proposals, the organization's president at the time, Charmaine Yoest, met with representatives of the Obama administration to discuss "conscience protection" and the absence of "explicit language banning abortion funding and coverage" in the bill. AUL later came out in opposition to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, [31] and its affiliated legislative action group launched a targeted campaign in congressional districts of House members who supported the bill. [32] In the two op-eds for the Wall Street Journal, Yoest argued that the health care bill would allow for federal funding of abortions and does not protect the rights of health care providers to not provide abortion services. [33] [34]

Supreme Court appointments

The organization has voiced opposition against Supreme Court justice appointments for judges who support abortion rights, including Ruth Bader Ginsburg [35] and Stephen Breyer. [36] In 2009, the organization was vocal in opposition of the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor, [6] arguing that she had a record of pro-abortion activism. [37] AUL provided testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee at the Congressional hearings to decide whether Sotomayor should be confirmed, as well as for then-Solicitor General Elena Kagan. [38] [39] [40]

Online campaigns

AUL has produced online campaigns to engage Americans in the anti-abortion movement. In 2008, the organization created a website and online petition as part of a campaign against the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA). As of September 2011, the petition had been signed by over 700,000 people. [41] [42] [43] Other campaigns have included a "Virtual March for Life" of around 85,000 people, [6] which it organized for members of the anti-abortion community unable to travel to Washington on the 37th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. The virtual march aimed to provide individuals with a way to be involved in anti-abortion protests without traveling to Washington D.C., where the annual "March for Life" was taking place. [44] The organization also created a Facebook page named "Support Tebow's Super Bowl Ad", to raise support for Tim Tebow's anti-abortion Super Bowl television commercial. [45]

Actions against Planned Parenthood

In 2011, AUL's 501(c)(4) organization, AUL Action, formed a partnership with other organizations, Expose Planned Parenthood, to campaign for the United States Congress to end federal funding of Planned Parenthood. [46] In an article in The Washington Times, the organization's counsel, Anna Franzonello, argued that the federal funding of Planned Parenthood effectively means that U.S. taxpayers are funding abortion procedures. She also voiced criticism of Planned Parenthood's advisory role to the government, particularly with regard to health care reform. [47] The organization released a 174-page report on Planned Parenthood in July 2011, based on a study of 20 years detailing alleged abuses including misuse of federal funds and poor patient care. The report contributed to the House Energy and Commerce Committee's decision to begin investigating Planned Parenthood under Representative Cliff Stearns. [48]

Funding

In 2010, AUL received $45,000 [49] from the Center to Protect Patient Rights (CPPR). AUL Action received $599,000 [49] from CPPR in 2010, which was 39% of their budget.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States abortion-rights movement</span> Support for womens right to elective abortion

The United States abortion-rights movement is a sociopolitical movement in the United States supporting the view that a woman should have the legal right to an elective abortion, meaning the right to terminate her pregnancy, and is part of a broader global abortion-rights movement. The movement consists of a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span>

In the United States, abortion is a divisive issue in politics and culture wars, though a majority of Americans support access to abortion. Abortion laws vary widely from state to state.

The Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. (PPFA), or simply Planned Parenthood, is an American nonprofit organization that provides reproductive and sexual healthcare and sexual education in the United States and globally. It is a member of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States anti-abortion movement</span> Movement in the United States opposing abortion

The United Statesanti-abortion movement is a movement in the United States that opposes induced abortion and advocates for the protection of fetal life. Advocates support legal prohibition or restriction on ethical, moral, or religious grounds, arguing that human life begins at conception and that the human zygote, embryo or fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. The anti-abortion movement includes a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body. There are diverse arguments and rationales for the anti-abortion stance. Some allow for some permissible abortions, including therapeutic abortions, in exceptional circumstances such as incest, rape, severe fetal defects, or when the woman's health is at risk.

Abortion in the Philippines is constitutionally prohibited. The constitutional provision that "[The State] shall equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception" was crafted by the Constitutional Commission which drafted the charter with the intention of providing for constitutional protection of the abortion ban, although the enactment of a more definitive provision sanctioning the ban was not successful. The provision is enumerated among several state policies, which are generally regarded in law as unenforceable in the absence of implementing legislation. The 1987 Constitution also contains several other provisions enumerating various state policies. Whether these provisions may, by themselves, be the source of enforceable rights without implementing legislation has been the subject of considerable debate in the legal sphere and within the Supreme Court.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

In United States politics, the Freedom of Choice Act was a bill which sought to codify into law for women a "fundamental right to choose to bear a child; terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability; or terminate a pregnancy after viability when necessary to protect her life or her health". It sought to prohibit a federal, state, or local governmental entity from denying or interfering with a woman's right to exercise such choices; or discriminating against the exercise of those rights in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information. Provides that such prohibition shall apply retroactively. It also authorizes an individual aggrieved by a violation of this Act to obtain appropriate relief, including relief against a governmental entity, in a civil action".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charmaine Yoest</span> American writer & activist (born 1964)

Charmaine Yoest is an American writer and political commentator. She was formerly the president and CEO of the Americans United for Life, an anti-abortion group. On April 28, 2017, it was announced that Yoest has been selected by President Donald Trump to serve in the United States Department of Health and Human Services, as the Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for Public Affairs.

Executive Order 13535 is an executive order announced by President Barack Obama on March 21, 2010, and signed on March 24, 2010. It reinforces a commitment to preservation of the Hyde Amendment's policy restricting federal funds for abortion within the context of recent health care legislation. The order was signed after an agreement with anti-abortion Democratic Congressman Bart Stupak, who had said he and several other anti-abortion Democrats in the House of Representatives would not support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act unless the Bill's language prohibiting federal funding of abortions was strengthened.

"War on women" is a slogan in United States politics used to describe certain Republican Party policies and legislation as a wide-scale effort to restrict women's rights, especially reproductive rights, including abortion. Prominent Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer, as well as feminists, have used the phrase to criticize proponents of these laws as trying to force their social views on women through legislation. The slogan has been used to describe Republican policies in areas such as access to reproductive health services, particularly birth control and abortion services; the definition of rape for the purpose of the public funding of abortion; the prosecution of criminal violence against women; and workplace discrimination against women.

Abortion in Texas is illegal in most cases. There are nominally exceptions to save the mother's life, or prevent "substantial impairment of major bodily function", but the law on abortion in Texas is written in such an ambiguous way that life-threatening or harmful pregnancies do not explicitly constitute an exception. Attempts to clarify and codify these exceptions into law have been rejected by Republican lawmakers in Texas.

Abortion in Alabama is illegal. Historically, Alabama's abortion laws have evolved from strict regulations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to a period of liberalization following the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide. However, Alabama has consistently enacted legislation aimed at restricting access to abortion.

As of 2024, the legal status of abortion in Missouri is unclear. From 2022 to 2024, abortions were only legal in cases of medical emergency, with several additional laws designed to make accessing abortion services difficult. In 2014, a poll by the Pew Research Center found that 45% of Missouri adults said that abortion should be legal vs. 50% that believe it should be illegal in all or most cases and 5% that do not know. The 2023 American Values Atlas reported that, in their most recent survey, 55% of Missourians said that abortion should be legal in all or most cases. According to a 2014 Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) study, 51% of white women in the state believed that abortion is legal in all or most cases.

Abortion in Michigan is legal throughout pregnancy. A state constitutional amendment to explicitly guarantee abortion rights was placed on the ballot in 2022 as Michigan Proposal 22–3; it passed with 57 percent of the vote, adding the right to abortion and contraceptive use to the Michigan Constitution. The amendment largely prevents the regulation of abortion before fetal viability, unless said regulations are to protect the individual seeking an abortion, and it also makes it unconstitutional to make laws restricting abortions which would protect the life and health, physical and/or mental, of the pregnant individual seeking abortion.

Abortion in Tennessee is illegal from fertilization and provides no exceptions for rape, incest or the health of the pregnant individual. Tennessee's abortion legislation provides no explicit exceptions for the pregnant patient’s health. It makes an exception for an “affirmative defense” for emergencies, but the vagueness of what constitutes an emergency means that physicians hesitate to provide abortions even when the pregnant individual's life is in jeopardy. Attempts to codify the exceptions into law have been rejected by Republican politicians in Tennesse. Tennessee is among the four states which forbid abortion access through their state constitution; alongside Alabama, Louisiana, and West Virginia.

Abortion in California is legal up to the point of fetal viability. An abortion ban was in place by 1900, and by 1950, it was a criminal offense for a woman to have an abortion. In 1962, the American Law Institute published their model penal code, as it applied to abortions, with three circumstances where they believed a physician could justifiably perform an abortion, and California adopted a version of this code. In 2002, the California State Legislature passed a law guaranteeing women the right to have an abortion "prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman". In 2022, 67% of California voters approved Proposition 1, which amended the Constitution of California to explicitly protect the right to abortion and contraception.

Abortion in Maryland is legal at all stages of pregnancy. The first laws regulating abortion in the state were passed in 1867 and 1868, banning abortion except by a physician to "secure the safety of the mother." Abortion providers continued to operate both within and outside of the law. Legal enforcement became more strict from the 1940s through 60s, with numerous police raids on abortion providers. In 1968, Maryland passed a liberalized abortion law that clarified the wording of the previous law, allowing abortion in hospital settings in cases of rape, severe fetal deformity, or when life and health were endangered.

Abortion in Florida is generally illegal after six weeks from the woman's last menstrual period, This law came into effect in May 2024, being approved by Republican Governor Ron DeSantis following its passage in the Florida House of Representatives and the Florida Senate, with only Republican state legislators supporting and only Democratic state legislators opposing. Additionally, pregnant women are generally required to make two visits to a medical facility 24 hours apart to be able to obtain an abortion, in a law approved by Republican Governor Rick Scott in 2015.

Abortion in Puerto Rico is technically prohibited on request, although it is de facto allowed without a clear limit. On June 22, 2022, the Senate passed a bill limiting abortion to 22 weeks, with exceptions for danger to the mother's life, fetal defects, and if the fetus would not be viable. The bill will need to be considered by the House.

Abortion in Iowa is illegal after detection of embryonic cardiac-cell activity. Embryonic cardiac-cell activity can be detected from around six weeks after the pregnant individual's last menstrual period, when many people are not yet aware that they are pregnant. Exceptions for the abortion ban after detected embryonic cardiac-cell activity include some instances of rape, incest, fetal abnormalities and threats to the pregnant individual's life.

References

  1. ↑ "Americans United for Life Mission" . Retrieved March 16, 2023.
  2. ↑ "Americans United for Life Board of Directors Announce Leadership Transition". March 10, 2023. Retrieved March 16, 2023.
  3. ↑ "IUD use attracts new opposition from anti-abortion groups". Reuters. December 1, 2015. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  4. ↑ Wenner, David (March 22, 2019). "Assisted dying: Aging of baby boomers coincides with increased support for enabling people to legally end their life". pennlive.com. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  5. ↑ "Surprised by all these abortion bans? Meet Americans United for Life — the most significant antiabortion group you've never heard of". The Washington Post. 2019.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 "History". Americans United for Life.org. April 23, 2010. Retrieved August 21, 2011.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Cummings, Jeanne (November 30, 2005). "Targeting Roe". The Wall Street Journal.
  8. ↑ Shipp, E.R. (April 2, 1984). "Foes of Abortion Examine Strategies of N.A.A.C.P.". The New York Times.
  9. 1 2 "Americans United for Life's Model California Parental Notification Language Protects Parental Rights". PR Newswire. November 18, 2004.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Ziegler, Mary. After Roe: The Lost History of the Abortion Debate. Harvard University Press. pp. 34–36, 170. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  11. ↑ Democrats for Life of America. (September 20, 2006). "Pro life Democrats endorse Lincoln Davis abortion reduction bill at press conference today." Retrieved January 19, 2007.
  12. ↑ Long, Wendy (March 14, 2006). "Victor G. Rosenblum and the Path to Victory Over Roe". The National Review. Retrieved August 26, 2011.
  13. ↑ George Weigel (August 11, 2010). "An Anniversary of Consequence". First Things. Retrieved August 22, 2011.
  14. ↑ Biskupic, Joan (February 7, 2006). "Abortion opponents going for 'fresh angle'". USA Today.
  15. ↑ New York Times. Justices Back Ban on Abortion Method. Linda Greenhouse. April 19, 2007. Retrieved November 24, 2008.
  16. ↑ Skalka, Jennifer (August 13, 2011). "Abortion opponents have a new voice". Christian Science Monitor.
  17. ↑ "States Opt Out". aul.org. Americans United for Life. Archived from the original on July 25, 2011. Retrieved September 8, 2011.
  18. ↑ "Pregnant Woman's Protection Act for the 2011 Legislative Year" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 12, 2011.
  19. ↑ "Revealed: The Group Behind the Bills that Could Legalize Killing Abortion Providers".
  20. ↑ Mother Jones. (February 15, 2011). "South Dakota Moves To Legalize Killing Abortion Providers." Retrieved March 1, 2011.
  21. ↑ Mother Jones. (February 24, 2011). "Iowa Bills Could Also Allow for "Justifiable Homicide" Defense Against Abortion Docs." Retrieved March 1, 2011.
  22. ↑ Kupas, Paige (July 14, 2022). "Swalwell presses anti-abortion activist on whether 10-year-olds should carry babies". The Hill. Retrieved July 15, 2022.
  23. ↑ Johnson, Chuck (July 14, 2022). "A man was charged in the rape of a 10-year-old who traveled to Indiana for an abortion". CNN. Retrieved July 15, 2022.
  24. ↑ Woodward, Alex (July 14, 2022). "Anti-abortion activist claims 10-year-old's abortion was not an abortion in bizarre House committee testimony". The Independent. Retrieved July 15, 2022.
  25. ↑ New York Times. Phillip J. Hilts.March 1, 1995 Abortion Pill Issue Creates a Clash for Some Republicans. Retrieved November 24, 2008.
  26. ↑ Pecquet, Julian (August 14, 2010). "Anti-abortion group blasts FDA approval of new emergency contraceptive". The Hill. Retrieved August 21, 2011.
  27. ↑ Langton, James. (October 7, 2005). "Revolutionary foetus sex test raises eugenics fears." London Telegraph. Retrieved January 19, 2006.
  28. ↑ "Anti-Abortion Groups Are Still Fighting Birth Control Coverage In Court". Huffington Post. July 10, 2014.
  29. ↑ Smith, Mailee R. (February 19, 2013). "Amicus Curiae Brief of Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Christian Medical Association, Catholic Medical Association, National Catholic Bioethics Center, Physicians for Life, and National Association of Pro Life Nurses" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Americans United for Life. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 2, 2014. Retrieved January 2, 2014.
  30. ↑ "Americans United for Life files brief against HHS contraceptive mandate". Catholic News Service/Catholic Philly. November 16, 2012.
  31. ↑ Robin Abcarian (September 11, 2009). "Abortion foes set against overhaul". Los Angeles Times.
  32. ↑ David M. Herszenhorn (March 15, 2010). "Anti-Abortion Group Targets House Democrats". The New York Times. Retrieved August 22, 2011.
  33. ↑ Yoest, Charmaine (March 4, 2010). "Abortion and the Health Bill". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 31, 2011.
  34. ↑ Yoest, Charmaine (October 15, 2009). "Tax Dollars Shouldn't Fund Abortion". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 31, 2011.
  35. ↑ Anderson, David E. (June 19, 1993). "Sizing up the new nominee". St. Petersburg Times.
  36. ↑ Elsasser, Glen (July 16, 1994). "On the final day, praise mixed with criticism for Brayer". Chicago Tribune.
  37. ↑ Dunham, Richard S. (August 6, 2008). "What to watch for at Sotomayor hearing". The Houston Chronicle. Retrieved August 15, 2011.
  38. ↑ "Diverse Witness List for Upcoming Sotomayor Hearing". Fox News. July 10, 2009. Retrieved August 18, 2011.
  39. ↑ "Hatch Stunned by Kagan Abortion Record". HumanEvents.com. July 1, 2010. Archived from the original on July 3, 2010. Retrieved August 22, 2011.
  40. ↑ Charmaine Yoest (July 2, 2010). "Kagan Displays 'A Real Hostility to Commonsense Abortion Regulations'". National Review Online. Retrieved August 22, 2011.
  41. ↑ "Fight FOCA". fightfoca.com. AUL Action. Retrieved September 8, 2011.
  42. ↑ Bedard, Paul (November 14, 2008). "Abortion Foes Mobilize Against Obama". US News. Retrieved August 26, 2011.
  43. ↑ Foust, Michael (December 12, 2008). "Obama could set pro-life movement back decades". Baptist Press. Archived from the original on May 11, 2011. Retrieved August 26, 2011.
  44. ↑ Bazar, Emily (January 22, 2010). "Health care the hot topic in abortion debate". USA Today. Retrieved August 18, 2011.
  45. ↑ Ehrlich, Brenna (January 28, 2010). "Tim Tebow Super Bowl Facebook page". Mashable. Retrieved August 20, 2011.
  46. ↑ Russell, Nicole (February 17, 2011). "Social Conservatives in the Age of Red Ink". The American Spectator. Archived from the original on November 8, 2011. Retrieved August 21, 2011.
  47. ↑ Franzonello, Anna (January 28, 2011). "Obama and Planned Parenthood make everyone pay for abortion". The Washington Times. Retrieved August 18, 2011.
  48. ↑ Sheppard, Kate (August 2012). "Wham, Bam, Sonogram! Meet the Ladies Setting the New Pro-Life Agenda". Mother Jones.
  49. 1 2 Novak, Viveca & Maguire, Robert. (May 18, 2012). "Mystery Health Care Group Funneled Millions to Conservative Nonprofits" OpenSecretsblog. Retrieved March 26, 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.