Angadi

Last updated

Angadi
Village
India Karnataka location map.svg
Red pog.svg
Angadi
Location in Karnataka
Coordinates: 13°13′23″N75°28′12″E / 13.223°N 75.470°E / 13.223; 75.470
CountryFlag of India.svg India
State Karnataka
District Chikkamagaluru district
Taluk Mudigere taluk
Languages
  Official Kannada
Time zone UTC+5:30 (IST)
PIN
577132
Vehicle registration KA-18

Angadi is a village in Mudigere taluk of Chikkamagaluru district, Karnataka, India. It is traditionally regarded as the original home of the Hoysala dynasty, and its considered the historical heart of Jainism where most Jain present at the time. [1] [2] The village is notable for its ruined Hoysala temples, Jain basadis, and the legendary site where the Hoysala founder Sala (Hoysala Dynasty) is believed to have slain a tiger. [3] [4]

Contents

History

According to legend, Angadi—then known as Sosevur or Sasakapura—was the first capital of the Hoysalas. The dynasty’s founder, Sala, is said to have killed a tiger here at the call of his Jain preceptor Sudatta Muni. The act gave rise to the royal emblem and the name "Hoy-sala" ("Strike, Sala"). [5]

Though later rulers shifted their capitals to Belur and Halebidu, inscriptions and local traditions indicate that Angadi retained significance as a spiritual and ancestral site. [6]

Religious significance

Angadi was a prominent Jain religious centre Before 12th Century. The region remained free of animal sacrifice due to its Jain affiliation. Jain basadis dedicated to Neminatha and Chandraprabha still survive in ruined form in and around the village. [7]

The area was Historically recorded as the centre of Jain education and ritual, with religious patronage from early Hoysala chiefs. [8]

Temples

Several Hoysala-style temples are located in Angadi, including:

These temples represent an earlier and simpler phase of Hoysala architecture, predating the ornate style seen in Belur and Halebidu. [10]

Legacy

Angadi Historically remains an important site for those interested in the Hoysala dynasty, Jain history, and medieval Karnataka. Though now a small village, its archaeological and cultural legacy is substantial, drawing occasional historians and travellers. [11]

See also

References

  1. Nagarajaiah 1999, p. 40-44
  2. Deccan Herald 2008, pp. 23-25.
  3. Deccan Herald 2008, pp. 20-22.
  4. Nagarajaiah 1999, p. 42-45
  5. Kamath 2001, pp. 125–126.
  6. Foekema 1996, p. 13.
  7. Deccan Herald 2008.
  8. Nagarajaiah 1999, p. 43-45
  9. Nagarajaiah 1999, p. 48-50
  10. Sastri 1955, pp. 357–361.
  11. Kamath 2001, pp. 126–128.

Bibliography