Anglo-Saxon runic rings

Last updated

Drawing of the Bramham Moor Ring inscription as published in 1736 in Drake's Eboracum Bramham Moor Ring inscription.png
Drawing of the Bramham Moor Ring inscription as published in 1736 in Drake's Eboracum

There are seven known rings of the Anglo-Saxon period (9th or 10th century) bearing futhorc inscriptions. Futhorc are Anglo-Saxon runes which were used to write Old English.

Contents

The most notable of the rings are the Bramham Moor Ring, found in the 18th century, and the Kingmoor Ring, found 1817, inscribed with a nearly identical magical runic formula read as

ærkriufltkriuriþonglæstæpontol

A third ring, found before 1824 (perhaps identical to a ring found in 1773 at Linstock castle in Carlisle), has a magical inscription of a similar type,

ery.ri.uf.dol.yri.þol.ƿles.te.pote.nol.

The remaining five rings have much shorter inscriptions.

Bramham Moor Ring

The Bramham Moor ring Bramham Moor ring.jpg
The Bramham Moor ring

The Bramham Moor Ring, dated to the ninth century, was found in Bramham cum Oglethorpe, West Yorkshire in or before 1732 (now in the Danish National Museum, no. 8545). It is made from electrum (gold with niello), with a diameter of c. 29 mm. and weighs 40.22 g.

The inscription reads: [1]

 

ᚫᚱᛦᚱᛁᚢᚠᛚᛏ

ærkriuflt

 

ᛦᚱᛁᚢᚱᛁᚦᚩᚾ

kriuriþon

 

ᚷᛚᚫᛋᛏᚫᛈᚩᚾ͡ᛏᚩᚿ

glæstæpon͡tol

᛭ ᚫᚱᛦᚱᛁᚢᚠᛚᛏ ᛭ ᛦᚱᛁᚢᚱᛁᚦᚩᚾ ᛭ ᚷᛚᚫᛋᛏᚫᛈᚩᚾ͡ᛏᚩᚿ

{} ærkriuflt {} kriuriþon {} glæstæpon͡tol

Where k is the late futhorc calc rune of the same shape as Younger Futhark Yr and the n͡t is written as a bindrune.

Kingmoor Ring

Kingmoor gold runic ring Kingmoor runic ring.jpg
Kingmoor gold runic ring

The Kingmoor Ring (also Greymoor Hill Ring) dates to the 9th or 10th century. It is of gold, with a diameter ca. 27 mm.

It was discovered in June 1817 at Greymoor Hill, Kingmoor, near Carlisle ( 54°55′0″N2°58′30″W / 54.91667°N 2.97500°W / 54.91667; -2.97500 ). By 1859, the ring was in the possession of the British Museum (ring catalogue no. 184) who has received it from the Earl of Aberdeen. A replica is on exhibit in the Tullie House Museum and Art Gallery in Carlisle.

The inscription reads: [1]

 

ᚨᚱᛦᚱᛁᚢᚠᛚᛏᛦᚱᛁᚢᚱᛁᚦᚩᚾᚷᛚᚨᚴᛏᚨᛈᚩᚾ

ærkriufltkriuriþonglæstæpon

/

/

ᛏᚨᚿ

tol

᛭ ᚨᚱᛦᚱᛁᚢᚠᛚᛏᛦᚱᛁᚢᚱᛁᚦᚩᚾᚷᛚᚨᚴᛏᚨᛈᚩᚾ / ᛏᚨᚿ

{} ærkriufltkriuriþonglæstæpon / tol

The final ᛏᚨᚿtol is written on the inside of the ring. The inscription amounts to a total of 30 signs.

Where k is the late Futhorc calc rune of the same shape as Younger Futhark Yr , and the s is the so-called "bookhand s" looking similar to a Younger Futhark k, .

Linstock Castle Ring

A ring made of agate, perhaps dating to the 9th century, found before 1824. Now British Museum ring catalogue no. 186.

The inscription reads:

ᛖᚱᚣ

ery

.

ᚱᛁ

ri

.

ᚢᚠ

uf

.

ᛞᚩᛚ

dol

.

ᚣᚱᛁ

yri

.

ᚦᚩᛚ

þol

.

?ᛚᛖᛋ

?les

.

ᛏᛖ

te

.

ᛈᚩᛏᛖ

pote

.

ᚾᚩᛚ??

nol

.

ᛖᚱᚣ ᛫ ᚱᛁ ᛫ ᚢᚠ ᛫ ᛞᚩᛚ ᛫ ᚣᚱᛁ ᛫ ᚦᚩᛚ ᛫ ?ᛚᛖᛋ ᛫ ᛏᛖ ᛫ ᛈᚩᛏᛖ ᛫ ᚾᚩᛚ?? ᛫

ery . ri . uf . dol . yri . þol . ?les . te . pote . nol .

Page (1999) takes this to be a corrupt version of the inscription of the Kingmoor and Bramham Moor rings.

The location where this ring was found is unrecorded, but Page (1999) suggests that it is identical to a ring found at Linstock Castle in 1773. A note found among Thorkelin's archive documenting his travels to England between 1785 and 1791. The paper records an obscure inscription, "ERY.RI.VF.MOL / YRI.VRI.NOL / GLES.TE.SOTE.THOL", identified as "found in 1773 at Lynstock Castle near Carlisle, & not far from the Picts Wall in Cumberland". Page adduces a note from a sale catalogue of 1778 which lists "An ancient Runic ring, found near the Picts Well, 1773". [2]

The ring bears a unique variant of ȳr which more closely resembles that rune's appearance in manuscripts than to the rune's other epigraphical attestations.

Wheatley Hill Finger-Ring

A gilded silver ring, dating to the 8th century, found in 1993 in Wheatley Hill, County Durham and now in the British Museum. [3]

The inscription reads:

[ᚻ]ᚱᛁᚾᚷᛁᚳᚻᚪᛏᛏ[ᚫ]

[h]ringichatt[æ]

[ᚻ]ᚱᛁᚾᚷᛁᚳᚻᚪᛏᛏ[ᚫ]

[h]ringichatt[æ]

I am called ring

The first and last runes are covered up by two of the three gem bosses that were later applied to the ring.

Whilst runic inscriptions often refer to the object on which they are written, usually this is "me" or another suitable pronoun. The Wheatley Hill Finger-Ring is unique amongst runic inscribed objects as identifying what type of object it is - a "ring". [4]

Interpretation of the ærkriu charm

The sequence ærkriu found on both the Kingmoor and Bramham Moor Rings is interpreted as a spell for staunching blood, based on comparison with a charm containing the sequence ærcrio found in Bald's Leechbook (i.vii, fol. 20v). For this reason, the entire inscription is likely a protective or healing charm or spell with the ring serving as an amulet. [1] [5]

The charm in Leechbook is also found in Bodley MS:

Leechbook i.vii [6] Bodley MS [7]

æȝryn. thon. struth. fola
arȝrenn. tart. struth. on. tria
enn. piath. hathu. morfana. on hæl
+ara. carn. leou. ȝroth. ƿeorn .lll.
ffil. crondi. ƿ.

ær grim struht fola.
ær grenn tart strut onntria
enn piathu Morfona onnhel.
ara carn leoƿ gruth ueron .lll.
fil cron diƿ .X. inro cron
aer crio ær mio aær leno.

The Leech book has the instruction: "to stop blood, poke into the ear with a whole ear of barley, in such a way that he [the patient] be unaware of it. Some write this:", followed by "either for horse or men, a blood-stauncher".

While the charm is "magical gibberish", there are a number of elements that can clearly be identified as Irish: struth fola corresponds to Old Irish sruth fola "stream of blood". Arȝrenn, ær grim, etc. may be for ær greann "for irritation". Other parts sound clearly Anglo-Saxon such as onnhel, on hæl for unhæl "unhealthy". The .lll. has been taken as a corruption of the ogham letter (w) "alder", the ffil. crondi. ƿ. following it as the gloss fil crand .i. ƿ[eorn] "it is a tree, i.e. 'alder'" In the interpretation of Meroney (1945), the original text gave a list of ingredients for staunching blood, alder (ƿeorn), curds (ȝroth), etc., with a gloss explaining one of them having slipped into the text. Cron aer crio is taken as Irish for "prohibition against bleeding", ær leno as "against afflictions" (Old Irish ar léunu). [8]

Fake rings

A number of fake rings, dating from the 18th century exist. They are generally bronze, do not have niello letters but rather some kind of lacquer, and show signs of machining.

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Page (1999), 112-114.
  2. Page (1999), 291f.
  3. "finger-ring". British Museum. Retrieved 19 August 2020.
  4. "The Wheatley Hill Finger-Ring". Artefactology. 28 May 2015. Retrieved 19 August 2020.
  5. Bruce Dickins, Runic Rings and Old English Charms ASNSL 167 (1935), 252.
  6. ed. Thomas Oswald Cockayne (1865, reprint 1965), II:54; Felix Grendon, The Anglo-Saxon Charms The Journal of American Folklore, Vol. 22, No. 84 (1909), 105-237 (201f.).
  7. ed. Arthur Napier, Herrig's Archiv 74 (1890), 323.
  8. Howard Meroney, Irish in the Old English Charms Speculum, Vol. 20, No. 2 (1945), 172-182

See also

Related Research Articles

Othala, also known as ēðel and odal, is a rune that represents the o and œ phonemes in the Elder Futhark and the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc writing systems respectively. Its name is derived from the reconstructed Proto-Germanic *ōþala- "heritage; inheritance, inherited estate". As it does not occur in Younger Futhark, it disappears from the Scandinavian record around the 8th century, however its usage continued in England into the 11th century, where it was sometimes further used in manuscripts as a shorthand for the word ēðel ("homeland"), similar to how other runes were sometimes used at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Runes</span> Ancient Germanic letter

A rune is a letter in a set of related alphabets known as runic alphabets native to the Germanic peoples. Runes were used to write Germanic languages before they adopted the Latin alphabet, and for specialised purposes thereafter. In addition to representing a sound value, runes can be used to represent the concepts after which they are named (ideographs). Scholars refer to instances of the latter as Begriffsrunen. The Scandinavian variants are also known as fuþark, or futhark, these names derived from the first six letters of the script, ⟨ᚠ⟩, ⟨ᚢ⟩, ⟨ᚦ⟩, ⟨ᚨ⟩/⟨ᚬ⟩, ⟨ᚱ⟩, and ⟨ᚲ⟩/⟨ᚴ⟩, corresponding to the Latin letters ⟨f⟩, ⟨u⟩, ⟨þ⟩/⟨th⟩, ⟨a⟩, ⟨r⟩, and ⟨k⟩. The Anglo-Saxon variant is futhorc, or fuþorc, due to changes in Old English of the sounds represented by the fourth letter, ⟨ᚨ⟩/⟨ᚩ⟩.

is the rune denoting the sound p in the Elder Futhark runic alphabet. It does not appear in the Younger Futhark. It is named peorð in the Anglo-Saxon rune-poem and glossed enigmatically as follows:

The Younger Futhark, also called Scandinavian runes, is a runic alphabet and a reduced form of the Elder Futhark, with only 16 characters, in use from about the 9th century, after a "transitional period" during the 7th and 8th centuries. The reduction, somewhat paradoxically, happened at the same time as phonetic changes that led to a greater number of different phonemes in the spoken language, when Proto-Norse evolved into Old Norse. Also, the writing custom avoided carving the same rune consecutively for the same sound, so the spoken distinction between long and short vowels was lost in writing. Thus, the language included distinct sounds and minimal pairs that were written the same.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elder Futhark</span> System of runes for Proto-Germanic

The Elder Futhark, also known as the Older Futhark, Old Futhark, or Germanic Futhark, is the oldest form of the runic alphabets. It was a writing system used by Germanic peoples for Northwest Germanic dialects in the Migration Period. Inscriptions are found on artifacts including jewelry, amulets, plateware, tools, and weapons, as well as runestones in Scandinavia, from the 2nd to the 10th centuries.

Algiz is the name conventionally given to the "z-rune" of the Elder Futhark runic alphabet. Its transliteration is z, understood as a phoneme of the Proto-Germanic language, the terminal *z continuing Proto-Indo-European terminal *s via Verner's law.

Jera is the conventional name of the j-rune of the Elder Futhark, from a reconstructed Common Germanic stem *jēra- meaning "harvest, (good) year".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Haglaz</span> Rune

*Haglaz or *Hagalaz is the reconstructed Proto-Germanic name of the h-rune , meaning "hail".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anglo-Saxon runes</span> Symbols used in the writing system of early Frisians and Anglo-Saxon peoples

Anglo-Saxon runes or Anglo-Frisian runes are runes that were used by the Anglo-Saxons and Medieval Frisians as an alphabet in their native writing system, recording both Old English and Old Frisian. Today, the characters are known collectively as the futhorc from the sound values of the first six runes. The futhorc was a development from the older co-Germanic 24-character runic alphabet, known today as Elder Futhark, expanding to 28-characters in its older form and up to 34-characters in its younger form. In contemporary Scandinavia, the Older Futhark developed into a shorter 16-character alphabet, today simply called Younger Futhark.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Franks Casket</span> Anglo-Saxon carved chest

The Franks Casket is a small Anglo-Saxon whale's bone chest from the early 8th century, now in the British Museum. The casket is densely decorated with knife-cut narrative scenes in flat two-dimensional low-relief and with inscriptions mostly in Anglo-Saxon runes. Generally thought to be of Northumbrian origin, it is of unique importance for the insight it gives into early Anglo-Saxon art and culture. Both identifying the images and interpreting the runic inscriptions has generated a considerable amount of scholarship.

A runic inscription is an inscription made in one of the various runic alphabets. They generally contained practical information or memorials instead of magic or mythic stories. The body of runic inscriptions falls into the three categories of Elder Futhark, Anglo-Frisian Futhorc and Younger Futhark.

The t-rune is named after Týr, and was identified with this god. The reconstructed Proto-Germanic name is *Tîwaz or *Teiwaz. Tiwaz rune was an ideographic symbol for a spear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alu (runic)</span> Runic inscription with uncertain meaning

The sequence alu is found in numerous Elder Futhark runic inscriptions of Germanic Iron Age Scandinavia between the 3rd and the 8th century. The word usually appears either alone or as part of an apparent formula. The symbols represent the runes Ansuz, Laguz, and Uruz. The origin and meaning of the word are matters of dispute, though a general agreement exists among scholars that the word represents an instance of historical runic magic or is a metaphor for it. It is the most common of the early runic charm words.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bind rune</span> Ligature of two or more runes

A bind rune or bindrune is a Migration Period Germanic ligature of two or more runes. They are extremely rare in Viking Age inscriptions, but are common in earlier (Proto-Norse) and later (medieval) inscriptions.

The Caistor-by-Norwich astragalus is a roe deer astragalus found in an urn at Caistor St. Edmund, Norfolk, England in 1937. The astragalus is inscribed with a 5th-century Elder Futhark inscription, reading ᚱᚨᛇᚺᚨᚾraïhan "roe deer". The inscription is the earliest found in England, and predates the evolution of the specifically Anglo-Frisian Futhorc. As the urn was found in a cemetery that indicated some Scandinavian influence, it has been suggested that the astragalus may be an import, perhaps brought from Denmark in the earliest phase of the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain. The inscription is an important testimony for the Eihwaz rune and the treatment of Proto-Germanic *ai. The h rune has the Nordic single-bar shape , not the Continental double-bar which was later adopted in the Anglo-Frisian runes.

The Undley bracteate is a 5th-century bracteate found in Undley Common, near Lakenheath, Suffolk. It bears the earliest known inscription that can be argued to be in Anglo-Frisian Futhorc.

Sowilo (*sōwilō), meaning "sun", is the reconstructed Proto-Germanic language name of the s-rune.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seax of Beagnoth</span> 10th century Anglo-Saxon seax

The Seax of Beagnoth is a 10th-century Anglo-Saxon seax. It was found in the inland estuary of the Thames in 1857, and is now at the British Museum in London. It is a prestige weapon, decorated with elaborate patterns of inlaid copper, brass and silver wire. On one side of the blade is the only known complete inscription of the twenty-eight letter Anglo-Saxon runic alphabet, as well as the name "Beagnoth" in runic letters. It is thought that the runic alphabet had a magical function, and that the name Beagnoth is that of either the owner of the weapon or the smith who forged it. Although many Anglo-Saxon and Viking swords and knives have inscriptions in the Latin alphabet on their blades, or have runic inscriptions on the hilt or scabbard, the Seax of Beagnoth is one of only a handful of finds with a runic inscription on its blade.

Runic is a Unicode block containing runic characters. It was introduced in Unicode 3.0 (1999), with eight additional characters introduced in Unicode 7.0 (2014). The original encoding of runes in UCS was based on the recommendations of the "ISO Runes Project" submitted in 1997.

Runic alphabets have seen numerous uses since the 18th-century Viking revival, in Scandinavian Romantic nationalism (Gothicismus) and Germanic occultism in the 19th century, and in the context of the Fantasy genre and of Germanic Neopaganism in the 20th century.

References