Animal testing at the University of Washington

Last updated

The University of Washington practices animal testing for a variety of purposes, including biomedical testing and paramedic training. Testing is performed by faculty from various departments across the university, and is conducted on animals including dogs, rabbits, primates, pigs, sheep, gerbils, bobcats, ferrets, and coyotes. [1] Testing on primates is done through the Washington National Primate Research Center, which is located on campus. Animal testing at UW is overseen by the university's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). [2]

Contents

Primate testing

Use of live pigs

Paramedic training

UW uses live pigs to train paramedics to perform a surgical airway procedure, in which a person's neck is cut into to create an emergency airway. This practice has received criticism from various individuals and organizations, including the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), members of the Washington House of Representatives, UW students, and paramedic Cindy Coker. [3] [4] [5] The PCRM reported that each year UW uses 20-40 pigs for this training, after which the pigs are euthanized. In January 2017, eight members of the Washington House of Representatives sent a letter to UW asking them to consider replacing the procedures on pigs with other methods.

Surgical training

In 2019, UW's medical school resumed using live pigs for surgical training after a five-year hiatus. This decision was criticized by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine as well as UW professor Lisa Jones-Engel. [6]

In November of 2021 The University of Washington confirmed that it has ended the use of live animals including pigs for the training of paramedics. [7]

Incidents and controversies

Lab incidents

From 2011 to 2012, a member of a research team neglected to administer proper pain medication to thirty rabbits. On February 5, 2013, the same individual violated protocol by administering anesthesia to another rabbit improperly during surgery. [8]

In 2013, a fractured pelvis was discovered in a rabbit, resulting in paralysis and euthanasia. Even though the laboratory claimed to have no explanation, it was discovered that a technician had handled the animal the day before, and a necropsy suggested that the injury occurred on that day. [8]

In February 2014, the USDA discovered that a guinea pig had died, after receiving inadequate pain relief following an operation three days earlier. [8]

IACUC membership confidentiality lawsuit

In 2022, due to pressure from the animal rights group PETA, the University of Washington agreed to publicly release the names of the members of UW's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). In response, the IACUC members, led by IACUC chair Jane Sullivan, sued UW claiming that public release of their names would threaten their safety. [9] Former UW IACUC member Lisa Jones-Engel criticized the attempt to keep the names private. Jones-Engel claimed that hiding the names allows UW to hide the fact that the IACUC has an unbalanced composition and has a strong bias towards the promotion of animal experimentation. In April 2022, a US district judge issued a preliminary injunction which prevented the release of the IACUC members' names. [10]

Animal Research and Care Facility (ARCF)

A significant amount of animal testing at UW takes place at the Animal Research and Care Facility (ARCF), which is located at the south end of UW Seattle's campus on NE Pacific St. [11]

Development

On November 14, 2013, UW's Board of Regents unanimously approved plans for a new animal testing lab. [12] The facility was initially budgeted at $123.5 million. In January 2017, the Board of Regents approved an additional $18.5 million to finish construction. [13]

Development of the lab was protested by animal rights activists. Several protests occurred during construction of the lab, with a large protest of about 500 people occurring on April 25, 2015. [14] [15]

In 2015, it was revealed by a King County Superior Court case that UW's governing board, the Board of Regents, violated Washington's Open Public Meetings Act law by discussing the new animal lab at the UW president's home. The judge determined that the Board of Regents violated the law on 24 occasions from 2012 to 2014, by discussing the animal lab and other business over dinner. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal testing</span> Use of nonhuman animals in experiments

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. This approach can be contrasted with field studies in which animals are observed in their natural environments or habitats. Experimental research with animals is usually conducted in universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to the industry. The focus of animal testing varies on a continuum from pure research, focusing on developing fundamental knowledge of an organism, to applied research, which may focus on answering some questions of great practical importance, such as finding a cure for a disease. Examples of applied research include testing disease treatments, breeding, defense research, and toxicology, including cosmetics testing. In education, animal testing is sometimes a component of biology or psychology courses. The practice is regulated to varying degrees in different countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alex Pacheco (activist)</span> American animal rights activist

Alexander Fernando Pacheco is an American animal rights activist. He is the founder of 600 Million Dogs, co-founder and former chairman of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and a member of the advisory board of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Labcorp Drug Development</span> Contract research organization

Labcorp Drug Development is a contract research organization (CRO) headquartered in Burlington, North Carolina, providing nonclinical, preclinical, clinical and commercialization services to pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Formerly called Covance, the company is part of Labcorp, which employs more than 70,000 people worldwide. Labcorp Drug Development claims to provide the world's largest central laboratory network. Labcorp Drug Development has been met by fierce activism from animal rights leaders including Jane Goodall for its animal testing procedures.

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) is a non-profit research and advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C., which promotes a plant-based diet, preventive medicine, and alternatives to animal research, and encourages what it describes as "higher standards of ethics and effectiveness in research." Its tax filing shows its activities as "prevention of cruelty to animals."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal Welfare Act of 1966</span> U.S. federal law

The Animal Welfare Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on August 24, 1966. It is the main federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research and exhibition. Other laws, policies, and guidelines may include additional species coverage or specifications for animal care and use, but all refer to the Animal Welfare Act as the minimally acceptable standard for animal treatment and care. The USDA and APHIS oversee the AWA and the House and Senate Agriculture Committees have primary legislative jurisdiction over the Act. Animals covered under this Act include any live or dead cat, dog, hamster, rabbit, nonhuman primate, guinea pig, and any other warm-blooded animal determined by the Secretary of Agriculture for research, pet use or exhibition. Excluded from the Act are birds, rats of the genus Rattus, mice of the genus Mus, farm animals, and all cold-blooded animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oregon National Primate Research Center</span>

The Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC) is one of seven federally funded National Primate Research Centers in the United States and has been affiliated with Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) since 1998. The center is located on 200 acres (0.81 km2) of land in Hillsboro, Oregon. Originally known as the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center (ORPRC), it was the first of the original seven primate centers established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The research center is administered and funded by the National Center for Research Resources, receiving $11 million in federal grants annually.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee</span>

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) are centrally important in applying laws about animal research in the United States. Similar systems operate in other countries, but generally under different titles; for example, in Canada a typical title would be the University Animal Care Committee (UACC), while in the United Kingdom it would be the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Silver Spring monkeys</span> Macaques used in neuroplasticity research; subjects of an animal-cruelty court case

The Silver Spring monkeys were 17 wild-born macaque monkeys from the Philippines who were kept in the Institute for Behavioral Research in Silver Spring, Maryland. From 1981 until 1991, they became what one writer called the most famous lab animals in history, as a result of a battle between animal researchers, animal advocates, politicians, and the courts over whether to use them in research or release them to a sanctuary. Within the scientific community, the monkeys became known for their use in experiments into neuroplasticity—the ability of the adult primate brain to reorganize itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laboratory animal suppliers in the United Kingdom</span>

Laboratory animal suppliers in the United Kingdom breed animals such as rodents, rabbits, dogs, cats and primates which they sell to licensed establishments for scientific experimentation. Many have found themselves at the centre of animal rights protests against animal testing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pro-Test</span>

Pro-Test was a British group that promoted and supported animal testing in medical research. It was founded on 29 January 2006 to counter SPEAK, an animal-rights campaign opposing the construction by Oxford University of a biomedical and animal-research facility, which SPEAK believes may include a primate-testing centre. Pro-Test held its first rally on 25 February 2006, attracting hundreds in support of the research facility and opposed by a smaller number of anti-lab demonstrators.

The National Primate Research Exhibition Hall (NPRX) is a proposed animal rights museum spearheaded by the Primate Freedom Project located in Madison, Wisconsin, United States. The museum is not yet open and is currently the subject of pending litigation over a property dispute. If opened, the Exhibition Hall intends to display exhibits, art, and educational displays regarding the controversial issue of non-human primate experimentation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foundation for Biomedical Research</span> American animal welfare organization

The Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR) is an American nonprofit organization, 501(c)(3), located in Washington, DC. Established in 1981, the organization is dedicated to informing the news media, teachers, and other groups about the need for lab animals in medical and scientific research. The organization, together with its partner, the National Association for Biomedical Research (NABR), argues that promoting animal research leads to improved health for both humans and animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">In Defense of Animals</span> American nonprofit organization

In Defense of Animals (IDA) is an animal protection organization founded in 1983 in San Rafael, California, US. The group's slogan is "working to protect the rights, welfare, and habitats of animals".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal testing regulations</span> Guidelines with regard to animal testing

Animal testing regulations are guidelines that permit and control the use of non-human animals for scientific experimentation. They vary greatly around the world, but most governments aim to control the number of times individual animals may be used; the overall numbers used; and the degree of pain that may be inflicted without anesthetic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harlan (company)</span> Laboratory supplier

Harlan Sprague Dawley Inc. was a supplier of animals and other services to laboratories for the purpose of animal testing. It provided pre-clinical research tools and services for the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agrochemicals, industrial chemical, and food industries.

The campaign against Highgate Rabbit Farm, also known as the Close Highgate Farm campaign, is a series of direct actions by anti-vivisection activists. Highgate Rabbit Farm in Market Rasen, Lincolnshire in England is licensed by the Home Office to breed rabbits and ferrets for animal-testing facilities, including Huntingdon Life Sciences. Actions have included a raid by the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and an arson claimed by the Militant Forces Against HLS. The ALF raid in 2008 saw 129 rabbits removed and £100,000-worth of damage to property. The campaign has been linked to activists involved in Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC).

A Designated Member Review (DMR) or Designated Subcommittee Review (DSR), also known as Designated Review, is a review of a protocol where a committee designates one or more members of the committee to review a decisionmaking process or a protocol or procedure, a review which would ordinarily require the full committee's review. Typically this pertains to IACUCs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">More Hall Annex</span> Former nuclear laboratory in historic building, Seattle, Washington, U.S.

The More Hall Annex, formerly the Nuclear Reactor Building, was a building on the campus of the University of Washington (UW) in Seattle, Washington, United States, that once housed a functional nuclear research reactor. It was inaugurated in 1961 and shut down in 1988, operating at a peak of 100 kilowatts thermal (kWt), and was officially decommissioned in 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clean Energy Institute</span> Research institute at the University of Washington

The Clean Energy Institute (CEI) is a research institute at the University of Washington. Founded in 2013, the institute maintains several facilities across the university's Seattle campus and supports renewable energy technology research, education, entrepreneurship, and outreach. The institute is under the direction of Daniel T. Schwartz, PhD.

The Washington National Primate Research Center (WaNPRC) is a federally-funded biomedical research facility located on the University of Washington's Seattle campus. The WaNPRC is part of a network of seven National Primate Research Centers which conduct biomedical research on primates. The center opened in 1961, and as of 2020, houses over 500 primates.

References

  1. ↑ "USDA Annual Report of Research Facility No. 0180-DOA-AN". USDA. April 2, 2020.
  2. ↑ "IACUC | Office of Animal Welfare". University of Washington . Retrieved 16 May 2020.
  3. ↑ Katey Rusch (October 21, 2016). "UW, Harborview: Stop using pigs to train paramedics, say critics". KING 5 News . Retrieved 11 May 2020.
  4. ↑ Matthew Nash (February 14, 2018). "Sequim grad seeks UW to stop using pigs for paramedic training". Sequim Gazette.
  5. ↑ Melissa Santos (April 28, 2017). ""Lawmakers to University of Washington: Stop training paramedics on pigs | Tacoma News Tribune"". The News Tribune . Retrieved 11 May 2020.
  6. ↑ Deborah Horne (May 31, 2019). "UW resumes controversial use of live animals in surgical training". KIRO-TV .
  7. ↑ https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/uw-replaces-animals-deadly-training-lab-following-years-pressure-physicians
  8. 1 2 3 Diane Forbes (February 28, 2014). "USDA Inspection Report 59141644580261". USDA.
  9. ↑ Grimm, David (15 March 2022). "Animal care panel sues own university, fearing harassment from animal rights activists". Science . Archived from the original on 27 March 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
  10. ↑ Moody, Josh (1 June 2022). "PETA vs. UW's Primate Center". Inside Higher Ed . Retrieved 7 September 2022.
  11. ↑ "Animal Research and Care Facility (ARCF) | Health Sciences Administration". University of Washington . Retrieved 16 May 2020.
  12. ↑ Sandi Doughton (November 15, 2013). "UW approves new animal-research facility". The Seattle Times .
  13. ↑ Katherine Long (January 13, 2017). "UW plugs $18.5 million gap to finish animal lab". The Seattle Times .
  14. ↑ Jack Broom (April 25, 2015). "Hundreds of activists protest against new UW animal lab". The Seattle Times .
  15. ↑ Katherine Long (October 1, 2015). "Animal-rights activists plan march to protest construction of UW Lab". The Seattle Times .
  16. ↑ Katherine Long (April 24, 2015). "UW broke state open-meetings law 24 times, judge rules". The Seattle Times .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.